The document discusses the student satisfaction survey conducted by the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) as part of the accreditation process for higher education institutions in India. It provides details about the context and purpose of the survey, the questionnaire structure and questions, the process of data collection and analysis, and how the results will affect the accreditation scoring. The survey uses a Likert scale and includes both objective and open-ended questions to assess various aspects of teaching and learning from the students' perspectives.
An all-inclusive procedure of Assessment & Accreditation of Higher Education Institutions, including Universities, Autonomous, Affiliated and Constituent Colleges (all Government institutions, Grant-in-aid colleges or Self-financed institutes) in India.
It explains step wise process of Registration, Online submission of IIQA (Institutional Information for Quality Assessment); SSR (Self-Study Report); DVV (Data Validation and Verification); SSS (Student Satisfaction Survey); PTV (Peer Team Visit); and Institutional Grading.
An all-inclusive procedure of Assessment & Accreditation of Higher Education Institutions, including Universities, Autonomous, Affiliated and Constituent Colleges (all Government institutions, Grant-in-aid colleges or Self-financed institutes) in India.
It explains step wise process of Registration, Online submission of IIQA (Institutional Information for Quality Assessment); SSR (Self-Study Report); DVV (Data Validation and Verification); SSS (Student Satisfaction Survey); PTV (Peer Team Visit); and Institutional Grading.
Proposed by NAAC, IQAC or Internal Quality Assurance Cell is a structure that helps educational institutions to improve their work processes and achieve learning outcomes & objectives.
The role of the coordinator of the IQAC is crucial in ensuring the effective functioning of all the members. The coordinator of the IQAC may be a senior person with expertise in quality aspects. She/he may be a full-time functionary or, to start with, she/he may be a senior academic /administrator entrusted with the IQAC as an additional responsibility. Secretarial assistance may be facilitated by the administration. It is preferable that the coordinator may have sound knowledge about the computer, its various functions and usage for effective communication.
It is about NAAC criterion3 Research, Innovations and Extension. It describes all key indicators in details with explanation. It is useful for the colleges to improve NAAC grade.
National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC)
Criteria 3 Research, Innovations and Extension
Key Indicators (KIs)
Quantitative Metrics - QnM
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Data Validation
Course Outcome and Program Outcome Calculation(new method)Ravikumar Tiwari
This presentation explains the new method (based on attainment level) of Course Outcome and Program Outcome Calculation. (with reference to National Board of Accreditation new SAR)
The importance of career assessment tools to assist with declaring and retaining a declared major.
Career assessment tools, Undeclared students, Higher education, Graduation rates, Graduation rates, Community colleges,
Proposed by NAAC, IQAC or Internal Quality Assurance Cell is a structure that helps educational institutions to improve their work processes and achieve learning outcomes & objectives.
The role of the coordinator of the IQAC is crucial in ensuring the effective functioning of all the members. The coordinator of the IQAC may be a senior person with expertise in quality aspects. She/he may be a full-time functionary or, to start with, she/he may be a senior academic /administrator entrusted with the IQAC as an additional responsibility. Secretarial assistance may be facilitated by the administration. It is preferable that the coordinator may have sound knowledge about the computer, its various functions and usage for effective communication.
It is about NAAC criterion3 Research, Innovations and Extension. It describes all key indicators in details with explanation. It is useful for the colleges to improve NAAC grade.
National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC)
Criteria 3 Research, Innovations and Extension
Key Indicators (KIs)
Quantitative Metrics - QnM
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Data Validation
Course Outcome and Program Outcome Calculation(new method)Ravikumar Tiwari
This presentation explains the new method (based on attainment level) of Course Outcome and Program Outcome Calculation. (with reference to National Board of Accreditation new SAR)
The importance of career assessment tools to assist with declaring and retaining a declared major.
Career assessment tools, Undeclared students, Higher education, Graduation rates, Graduation rates, Community colleges,
A Presentation giving details of the Govt. Merit Scholarship Examination for students of std.5th & 8th studying in the recognized schools of Maharashtra State - India
For your initial post, review Applying the Master Narrative FramewShainaBoling829
For your initial post, review Applying the Master Narrative Framework to Gender Identity Development in Emerging Adulthood and answer the following questions:
· How does the article help us to understand gender identity development beyond the research in the textbook?
· How can a theorist that you have explored help us understand gender identity development? Describe three ways that you can support a friend, colleague, or family member who identifies as nonbinary.
· How does gender identity development apply to any of the following programmatic themes? You may want to review the Programmatic Themes document.
· Self-care
· Social justice
· Emotional intelligence
· Career connections
· Ethics
HA 705 - Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care
Wendy Brizer-Maciol
Instructor’s Contact Information:
Office Hours: Will be posted weekly and by appointment
Email: [email protected]
Best way to communicate with the professor is via e-mail
Course Information:
On-lineCourse Description
This course provides the student with the tools they need to improve the quality of health care across the spectrum of institutions, by applying systematic measures to identify opportunities for improvement, implement change, and assess outcomes. This course provides the theoretical framework and the practical skills to understand the processes under the auspices of quality improvement and real-world examples.
Prerequisites
NONE
Learning Objectives
By the end of the course, students should be able to:
1. Design strategies to identify, evaluate, and resolve performance issues.
2. Assemble data in formats consistent with industry standards.
3. Summarize preparedness strategies for Joint Commission compliance.
4. Evaluate systematic methods of problem identification, resolution, and ongoing monitoring.
5. Apply performance improvement strategies to medical and administrative indicators and events.
6. Describe the relationship of leadership and quality improvement.
Course Materials
No Textbook – resources will be provided by professor
Monroe College Attendance Policy
The value of a college education depends upon full participation in academic classes. Students are expected not only to receive information and to pass examinations, but also to participate actively in class. For that reason, regular attendance is important.
The college experience also is meant to prepare students to undertake meaningful careers and to develop the kind of professional behavior appropriate to obtaining gainful employment. Because excellent classroom attendance and participation are the foundation for the attainment of these goals, Monroe College has instituted the following policy.
King Graduate School Attendance Policy
Students are expected to come to class on time and to attend all classes. More than two absences in this course will result in the reduction of the student’s final grade by a full letter (for example from A to B). Students who are absent more than four (4 ...
Karthik Muralidharan on research on achieving universal quality primary educa...Twaweza
A presentation by Prof. Karthik Muralidharan on research on achieving universal quality primary education in India. This was presented at the Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, on June 19, 2014, to an audience of researchers.
From Throwing Stones to Creating Ripples Ramapo’s Approach to Student SuccessHobsons
Joseph Connell, Director of Student Success, and Tracey Bender, Student Success Coordinator at Ramapo College discussed implementation and execution of Starfish and how intentionality, collaboration, and closing the loop have increased student success. Learn specific examples of how student success metrics have improved as a result of Starfish implementation and examples of how student-focused offices have leveraged the technology to create ripple effects that extend campus-wide.
Local school board members are a key link between school districts and communities. They represent public concerns around testing and can hold district officials accountable. Given the critical role that local school boards play, Achieve and the National School Boards Association have developed “Assessment 101” resources for school board members. This professional development module is designed to:
· outline the critical role school boards play in supporting high quality assessment systems;
· introduce school board members to key assessment concepts and issues;
· provide an introduction to the Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts as a process to streamline testing and support limited, high-quality assessments for all students.
Assessing the Impact of Mentoring: Lessons Learned from a Research Study in W...ICF
Samantha Spinney, Ph.D., Manager, Child Welfare & Education, ICF
Understand the impact mentoring has on students' behavioral engagement, academic achievement, and non-cognitive skill outcomes and learn best practices for designing and implementing a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in a school setting.
Learn more: https://www.icf.com/
Staying Ahead of the Curve: Best Practices for Collecting Career Outcomes Da...Gil Rogers
This 30-minute webinar provides an overview of The Outcomes Survey® - a comprehensive survey research solution currently being used by more than 128 colleges and universities in 38 states to collect and report career outcomes data on their new graduates. It also presents six “best practice” strategies for staying ahead of the data collection curve using The Outcomes Survey® and illustrated using examples drawn from client institution experience.
Schools wishing to offer current and prospective students with more thorough, thoughtful, representative and defensible answers to the question “what can I do when I graduate?” will benefit from learning more about The Outcomes Survey® and the six best practices strategies presented in this webinar.
To learn more about The Outcomes Survey®, you can also go to http://TheOutcomesSurvey.com.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
2. Context:
◦ From 2017 onwards the NAAC (National Assessment and Accreditation Council) has
endeavoured to conduct a Student Experience Survey the results of which will go into the
accreditation process.
◦ The Survey will capture student responses through the list of students provided by the Higher
education institutes (HEIs).
◦ The students will remain anonymous throughout the process. The institution is supposed to
send a list of total student strength, with details of their student ID number, Aadhaar ID number
(Any other Valid ID No. in the absence of Aadhaar), degree programme, email id and mobile
number.
◦ NAAC will send online link to the survey to the email address/mobile no of the student, and the
student will have to fill the survey before a stipulated date.
3. About questionnaire:
◦ The questionnaire will be based on the Likert type scale.
◦ survey is part of the second criterion on Teaching—Learning and Evaluation, out of the seven
NAAC criteria.
◦ The questionnaire consists of several facets of the teaching learning process.
◦ Questions vary from specific teaching skills of the teacher, to his overall approach to the
educational process.
◦ Specific skills of the teacher like, subject knowledge, communication skills, class preparation,
and use of ICT tools are part of the questionnaire.
4. ◦ The overall approach of the teacher and institution with respect to providing the right
environment, motivation, interpersonal relationships, feedback etc. forms the second major
component of the questionnaire.
◦ Twenty of the twenty one questions are objective in nature, while one question is open ended to
elicit observations and suggestions for improvements providing an opportunity to the student
to give suggestions and criticisms in their own words.
◦ Analysis of the survey would be done using software which will aggregate the responses and
generate the score.
◦ The score will range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 4 on a five point scale and would
affect the overall score of second criteria on Teaching-Learning and evaluation.
◦ Responses to the open ended question would also be aggregated to find out the most common
suggestion and criticisms emerging out of the survey.
5. Process:
◦ The survey analysis score will be used as a key component of accreditation.
◦ A predetermined weightage is also assigned to this key indicator in this accreditation
framework. A stratified random sample of students will be chosen for the survey.
◦ Response rate below 10% will not be considered. In sample, students would be spread evenly
across different classes, year of enrolment and gender as far as possible.
◦ The HEIs are required to submit data of all students. (Class wise with name, e-mail & mobile
number and Aadhaar number) The institution, teachers; should not by any way try to influence
the students with respect to the survey.
◦ This will ensure genuine feedback for the institute to improve further.
6. Analysis of questionnaire:
◦ There are twenty objective questions in the questionnaire and one open ended question.
7. Analysis of objective questions:
◦ There are twenty objective questions and students will respond on a scale of 4 to 0, with the
most positive response rated as 4 and most negative response rated as 0.
◦ The mean score for each question will be calculated and the overall mean will be arrived at.
◦ This figure will range from 4 to 0 and will give the mean satisfaction level of the students for the
particular institute.
◦ This figure in the range of 4 to 0 will be the score of key indicator ‘Student Satisfaction Survey’
(2.7.1) which is part of criterion II on Teaching – Learning and Evaluation
8. Analysis of the open-ended question:
◦ The students are asked to give three observations/suggestions to improve the overall teaching--
learning experience in the institution.
◦ Analysis would be carried out by aggregating the most occurring suggestions in the student
responses.
◦ This would provide an idea of the most general expectations, observations and suggestions
from the students.
◦ This Information can be provided to peer team conducting onsite visit, to be used for validation
as well as peer team report preparation.
9. A) Please confirm this is the first and only time you answer this survey.
a) Yes b) No
B) Age:
C) College Name:
D) Gender:
a) Female b) Male c) Transgender
E) What degree program are you pursuing now?
a) Bachelor’s b) Master’s c) M. Phil d) Doctorate e) Other ( )
F) What subject area are you currently pursuing?
a) Arts b) Commerce c) Science d) Professional e) Other: ( )
10. Instructions to fill the questionnaire
◦ All questions should be compulsorily attempted.
◦ Each question has five responses, choose the most appropriate one.
◦ The response to the qualitative question no. 21 is student’s opportunity to give
◦ suggestions or improvements; she/he can also mention weaknesses of the
institutehere. (Kindly restrict your response to teaching learning process only)