This document discusses the concepts of social stratification and the theories behind it. It defines social stratification as the hierarchical arrangement of people in society based on factors such as wealth, power, and prestige. The document outlines functionalist and Marxist theories of social stratification, comparing how they view the roles and relationships between social classes. It also distinguishes between social classes and castes, noting that classes are more open and allow for social mobility while castes are strictly hereditary.
my short report in sociology about social stratification.. :D x x x
My slides includes:
Meaning of stratification
Basic concepts of inequality
Social stratification system
Dimensions of social stratification
Methods of determining class divisions
The theories of social stratification
Four ways in which wealth can be distributed
Three types of social stratification
Classes in some countries
Basics of social stratification including history, concepts and social mobility. How social stratification affects oral health with evidence from literature.
my short report in sociology about social stratification.. :D x x x
My slides includes:
Meaning of stratification
Basic concepts of inequality
Social stratification system
Dimensions of social stratification
Methods of determining class divisions
The theories of social stratification
Four ways in which wealth can be distributed
Three types of social stratification
Classes in some countries
Basics of social stratification including history, concepts and social mobility. How social stratification affects oral health with evidence from literature.
41Topic 9 Stratification—Functionalist and Conflict Theorie.docxgilbertkpeters11344
4
1
Topic 9: Stratification—Functionalist and Conflict Theories
The word stratification is used a lot in the world of social scientists. It is a concept that rivals socialization in terms of importance; in fact, some consider it a major factor in how we learn to relate to the world.
So what does it mean? It is an intimidating word, but if you break it down to it’s root you find the word ‘strata’, and strata means one in a series of layers. If you look at where this root appears in other words related to the physical world, substratum meaning the underlying layers of the earth; stratosphere meaning the layers of the atmosphere, you can see the concept of layering quite clearly.
But what could this word mean in the social world? Think about it. How do we layer people within the social world?
The sociological explanation of stratification refers to a system or institutional patterns which society uses to rank groups of people. A person is typically placed within the different layers or groups in accordance to their access to valued and scarce resources.
Now that we have the sociological definition, lets move back to the question I asked a before—How do we layer or group or rank people in the social world? See how many ways you can list. The top four ways people are ranked in society are as follows; economic, religious, race/ethnicity and gender.
Which do you think is the most important way we categorize people? Which controls most areas of your life? Typically in American society we see economic class as the most significant, but this is open for discussion. The importance of these rankings varies depending on the type of society you are born into. We for the most part have been born or live in a capitalistic class based society—So it makes sense that economic class would be the most important determinate of strata placement.
Look again to the four main means of dividing or ranking people (religion, race/ethnicity, economic, gender). How many of these things can we change in our society? For the most part only two; religion and economic class. (I know with enough money the medical world can alter genders and skin tone, but no matter what procedures you have done legally your gender and race/ethnicity will remain the same.)
The categories that we have no control over and things we cannot change are part of what sociologists call an ascribed status. An ascribed status is one’s position in society is determined by something an individual has no control over and cannot change; like race and gender.
Whereas the categories that we have control over and can in some way change are part of what sociologists call an achieved status. An achieved status means that there are elements within a persons control that an individual can alter to alter their social ranking within the stratification system.
These two types of status’s are related directly to the two types of societies(open and closed societies), and the type of soci.
Disclaimer:
All of the pictures and pieces of information on this site are the property of their respective owners. I do not hold any copyright in regards to these pictures and information. These pictures have been collected from different public sources including various websites, considered to be in the public domain. If anyone has any objection to display of any picture, image or information, it may be brought to my notice by sending an email (contact me) & the disputed media will be removed immediately, after verification of the claim.
1 S o c i a l T h e o r i e s Social Theories .docxjeremylockett77
1 | S o c i a l T h e o r i e s
Social Theories
Learning Outcomes
At the end of this chapter you will be able to do the following.
x Explain the major assumptions of each of the three major theoretical perspectives.
x Compare and contrast the three major theoretical perspectives.
x Apply the three major theoretical perspectives to everyday life.
MAKING SENSE OF ABSTRACT THEORIES
Sociological theories are the core and underlying strength of the discipline. They guide
researchers in their studies; they also guide practitioners in their intervention strategies.
And they will provide you with a basic understanding of how to see the larger social picture
in your own personal life. A sociological theory is a set of interrelated concepts used to
describe, explain, and predict how society and its parts are related to each other. Let’s use
binoculars as a metaphor to illustrate the usefulness of a theory. Binoculars serve to
magnify, enlarge, clarify, and expand our view of the thing we are looking at. Unlike
binoculars, you can’t see or touch a theory, but it is a framework to help you “see” the
world sociologically. Some things you want to look at need 20x80 strength binoculars
while you might see other things better with 8x40 or 10x30 lenses. It’s the same with
society. Some things need the lens of Conflict Theory, while others need a Structural
Functionalist or Symbolic Interactionist lenses. Some social phenomena can be viewed
using each of the three frameworks, although each will give you a slightly different view of
the topic under investigation.
Theories are sets of interrelated concepts and ideas that have been scientifically tested and
combined to magnify, enlarge, clarify, and expand our understanding of people, their
behaviors, and their societies. Without theories, science would be a futile exercise in
statistics. In the diagram below, you can see the process by which a theory leads
sociologists to perform a certain type of study with certain types of questions that can test
the assumptions of the theory. Once the study is administered, the findings and
generalizations can be considered to see if they support the theory. If they do, similar
studies will be performed to repeat and fine-tune the process. If the findings and
generalizations do not support the theory, the sociologist rethinks and revisits the
assumptions they made.
Here’s a real-life scientific example: In the 1960s, two researchers named Cumming and
Henry studied the processes of aging. They devised a theory on aging that had assumptions
built into it. These were, simply put, that all elderly people realize the inevitability of death
and begin to systematically disengage from their previous youthful roles while at the same
time society prepares to disengage from them.1 Cumming and Henry tested their theory on
a large number of elderly persons. Findings and generalization consistently yielded a “no”
in terms of sup ...
1 S o c i a l T h e o r i e s Social Theories .docxcroftsshanon
1 | S o c i a l T h e o r i e s
Social Theories
Learning Outcomes
At the end of this chapter you will be able to do the following.
x Explain the major assumptions of each of the three major theoretical perspectives.
x Compare and contrast the three major theoretical perspectives.
x Apply the three major theoretical perspectives to everyday life.
MAKING SENSE OF ABSTRACT THEORIES
Sociological theories are the core and underlying strength of the discipline. They guide
researchers in their studies; they also guide practitioners in their intervention strategies.
And they will provide you with a basic understanding of how to see the larger social picture
in your own personal life. A sociological theory is a set of interrelated concepts used to
describe, explain, and predict how society and its parts are related to each other. Let’s use
binoculars as a metaphor to illustrate the usefulness of a theory. Binoculars serve to
magnify, enlarge, clarify, and expand our view of the thing we are looking at. Unlike
binoculars, you can’t see or touch a theory, but it is a framework to help you “see” the
world sociologically. Some things you want to look at need 20x80 strength binoculars
while you might see other things better with 8x40 or 10x30 lenses. It’s the same with
society. Some things need the lens of Conflict Theory, while others need a Structural
Functionalist or Symbolic Interactionist lenses. Some social phenomena can be viewed
using each of the three frameworks, although each will give you a slightly different view of
the topic under investigation.
Theories are sets of interrelated concepts and ideas that have been scientifically tested and
combined to magnify, enlarge, clarify, and expand our understanding of people, their
behaviors, and their societies. Without theories, science would be a futile exercise in
statistics. In the diagram below, you can see the process by which a theory leads
sociologists to perform a certain type of study with certain types of questions that can test
the assumptions of the theory. Once the study is administered, the findings and
generalizations can be considered to see if they support the theory. If they do, similar
studies will be performed to repeat and fine-tune the process. If the findings and
generalizations do not support the theory, the sociologist rethinks and revisits the
assumptions they made.
Here’s a real-life scientific example: In the 1960s, two researchers named Cumming and
Henry studied the processes of aging. They devised a theory on aging that had assumptions
built into it. These were, simply put, that all elderly people realize the inevitability of death
and begin to systematically disengage from their previous youthful roles while at the same
time society prepares to disengage from them.1 Cumming and Henry tested their theory on
a large number of elderly persons. Findings and generalization consistently yielded a “no”
in terms of sup.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
1. 11
Socio Economic StratificationSocio Economic Stratification
FS 101 – Advanced Foundation of Education
Ruel A. PunzalanRuel A. Punzalan
ReporterReporter
2. 22
Today’s ObjectivesToday’s Objectives
To Clarify the Concept of Social Stratification andTo Clarify the Concept of Social Stratification and
Discus its other relevant aspects.Discus its other relevant aspects.
To Discus Related Theories and Consequences ofTo Discus Related Theories and Consequences of
Social Stratification.Social Stratification.
3. 33
Definitions of Social StratificationDefinitions of Social Stratification
What is Social Stratification?What is Social Stratification?
1.1. ““Social Stratification is the division of society in permanentSocial Stratification is the division of society in permanent
groups or categories linked with each other by thegroups or categories linked with each other by the
relationship of superior and subordination.” (Gisbert)relationship of superior and subordination.” (Gisbert)
2.2. ““Stratification is a Horizontal division of society into higherStratification is a Horizontal division of society into higher
and lower social units.” (Raymond W.Murray)and lower social units.” (Raymond W.Murray)
●
Social Stratification refers to the hierarchical arrangement ofSocial Stratification refers to the hierarchical arrangement of
people in a society.people in a society.
4. 44
Conclusion of definitionConclusion of definition
1)1) SSocial stratification is “ the division of society levels, stepsocial stratification is “ the division of society levels, steps
or positions.”or positions.”
2)2) SStratification is, in essence, the structured inequality oftratification is, in essence, the structured inequality of
entire categories of People.”entire categories of People.”
3)3) SStratification is different than mere inequality, which refertratification is different than mere inequality, which refer
to the uneven distribution of opportunities and rewards toto the uneven distribution of opportunities and rewards to
individuals and groups.”individuals and groups.”
4)4) WWhen these inequalities becomes structured into society andhen these inequalities becomes structured into society and
passed on from generation to generation, we have socialpassed on from generation to generation, we have social
Stratification.”Stratification.”
5. Four basic principlesFour basic principles
Social stratification is based on four basicSocial stratification is based on four basic
principles:principles:
1.1. Social stratification is a trait of society, notSocial stratification is a trait of society, not
simply a reflection of individual differences;simply a reflection of individual differences;
2.2. Social stratification carries over fromSocial stratification carries over from
generation to generation;generation to generation;
3.3. Social stratification is universal but variable;Social stratification is universal but variable;
4.4. Social stratification involves not justSocial stratification involves not just
inequality but beliefs as well.inequality but beliefs as well.
6. 66
Dimensions of Social StratificationDimensions of Social Stratification
1.1. Wealth:-Wealth:- TThe economic assets of an individual, includinghe economic assets of an individual, including
income, monetary assets and other holdings.income, monetary assets and other holdings.
2.2. Power:-Power:- The ability to attain goals and maintain influenceThe ability to attain goals and maintain influence
over others, even in the absence of their consent.over others, even in the absence of their consent.
3.3. Prestige:-Prestige:- The approval and respect received from otherThe approval and respect received from other
members of society.members of society.
7. 77
Consequences of Social StratificationConsequences of Social Stratification
a)a) LLongevityongevity
b)b) HHealth and illnessealth and illness
c)c) CChildbearing and Rearinghildbearing and Rearing
d)d) CCrime and Criminal Justice Contactsrime and Criminal Justice Contacts
8. 88
Theories of Social StratificationTheories of Social Stratification
Functionalist TheoryFunctionalist Theory
1.1. functionalist theory understands society as a “System” orfunctionalist theory understands society as a “System” or
“Organism”“Organism”
2.2. AAs functionalists, Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moores functionalists, Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore
contended that stratification was a necessity for societycontended that stratification was a necessity for society
because:because:
3.3. SSociety has numerous positions that must be fulfilled if it isociety has numerous positions that must be fulfilled if it is
to function properly.to function properly.
9. 99
( Continue)( Continue) Functionalist TheoryFunctionalist Theory
4.4. SSome positions, however are more important for theome positions, however are more important for the
maintenance of society ( e.g., physicians )maintenance of society ( e.g., physicians )
5.5. FFinally, some positions require special talents that are notinally, some positions require special talents that are not
generally prevalent in the population.generally prevalent in the population.
6.6. HHence, functionally important positions and/or positionsence, functionally important positions and/or positions
requiring rare talent are rewarded most highly.requiring rare talent are rewarded most highly.
10. 1010
Criticisms of Functional TheoryCriticisms of Functional Theory
Ex Post Facto Judgment of Functional Importance of PositionsEx Post Facto Judgment of Functional Importance of Positions
• Critics question the functional importance of certain highlyCritics question the functional importance of certain highly
rewarded positions such as actors and sports figures, in contrastrewarded positions such as actors and sports figures, in contrast
to positions such as school teachers or social workers.to positions such as school teachers or social workers.
The stratification system itself Inhibits Talent and AbilitiesThe stratification system itself Inhibits Talent and Abilities
• Many barriers are placed in the way of individuals from lowerMany barriers are placed in the way of individuals from lower
classes to keep them from competing effectively.classes to keep them from competing effectively.
11. 1111
Marxist Conflict TheoryMarxist Conflict Theory
1.1. SSuggest that social stratification is determined by theuggest that social stratification is determined by the
Relations of Production.Relations of Production.
2.2. BBourgeoisie- capitalists who own the means of production.ourgeoisie- capitalists who own the means of production.
3.3. PProletariat- wage laborers who sell their labor toroletariat- wage laborers who sell their labor to
bourgeoisie.bourgeoisie.
4.4. IInterests of these two classes are intrinsically opposed.nterests of these two classes are intrinsically opposed.
5.5. PPower of the capitalists allows them to impose their will andower of the capitalists allows them to impose their will and
realize their interests.realize their interests.
6.6. AAccording to Marx, the proletariat will eventually develop according to Marx, the proletariat will eventually develop a
class consciousness, and ultimately overthrow theclass consciousness, and ultimately overthrow the
capitalists.capitalists.
12. 1212
Comparing Functional and Conflict TheoriesComparing Functional and Conflict Theories
What is Caste?What is Caste?
• Definition of CasteDefinition of Caste
““When a class is somewhat strictly hereditary, we may call it aWhen a class is somewhat strictly hereditary, we may call it a
Caste.” (Cooly, C.H)Caste.” (Cooly, C.H)
““When status is wholly predetermined, so that men are born toWhen status is wholly predetermined, so that men are born to
their lot in life without any hope of changing it, then Classtheir lot in life without any hope of changing it, then Class
takes the form of Class.” (Maclver)takes the form of Class.” (Maclver)
““A Caste is an aggregate of persons whose share of obligationsA Caste is an aggregate of persons whose share of obligations
and privileges is fixed by birth, sanctioned and supported byand privileges is fixed by birth, sanctioned and supported by
magic and religion. “( Martindale and Monachesi) .magic and religion. “( Martindale and Monachesi) .
13. 1313
( Continue )( Continue ) Comparing Functional and Conflict TheoriesComparing Functional and Conflict Theories
What is Class?What is Class?
Definition of ClassDefinition of Class
““A Social Class is any portion of community marked off from theA Social Class is any portion of community marked off from the
rest by Social Status.” ( Maclver )rest by Social Status.” ( Maclver )
It is the sense of status, sustained by the Economic, Political orIt is the sense of status, sustained by the Economic, Political or
ecclesiastical Power and by the distinctive modes of life andecclesiastical Power and by the distinctive modes of life and
cultural Expressions Corresponding to them, that draws Classcultural Expressions Corresponding to them, that draws Class
apart. From class, gives Cohesion to Each class and Stratifies aapart. From class, gives Cohesion to Each class and Stratifies a
whole society.” ( Ibid ).whole society.” ( Ibid ).
A Social Class is the aggregate of persons having essentially theA Social Class is the aggregate of persons having essentially the
same social status in a given Society.” ( Ogburn and Nimkoff ).same social status in a given Society.” ( Ogburn and Nimkoff ).
15. The stratification of society is also basedThe stratification of society is also based
upon either anupon either an openopen, or, or closedclosed systemsystem..
OPENOPEN
Status isStatus is achievedachieved throughthrough
merit, and effortmerit, and effort . This is. This is
sometimes known as asometimes known as a
meritocracymeritocracy. The UK is a. The UK is a
relatively open society,relatively open society,
although disadvantagedalthough disadvantaged
groups within society face agroups within society face a
glass ceiling.glass ceiling.
ClosedClosed
Status isStatus is ascribedascribed, rather, rather
than achieved. Ascribedthan achieved. Ascribed
status can be based uponstatus can be based upon
several factors, such asseveral factors, such as
family backgroundfamily background (e.g.(e.g.
the feudal system consiststhe feudal system consists
of landowners and serfs).of landowners and serfs).
Political factorsPolitical factors may alsomay also
play a role (e.g. societiesplay a role (e.g. societies
organised on the basis oforganised on the basis of
communism), as cancommunism), as can
ethnicityethnicity (e.g. the former(e.g. the former
apartheid regime in Southapartheid regime in South
Africa) and religion.Africa) and religion.
16. Structure of inequalityStructure of inequality
The power of the elite within society is based upon:The power of the elite within society is based upon:
Income
Wealth
A network of social
connections
17. The power of the elite within society isThe power of the elite within society is
based upon;based upon;
IncomeIncome
WealthWealth
A network of social connectionsA network of social connections ––
sometimes known as the ‘old boys network’sometimes known as the ‘old boys network’
18. Organization of ModernOrganization of Modern
Western societiesWestern societies
In modernIn modern Western societiesWestern societies, stratification is, stratification is
broadly organized into three main layers:broadly organized into three main layers:
upper class,upper class,
middle classmiddle class
lower classlower class
Each of these classes can be further subdivided into smallerEach of these classes can be further subdivided into smaller
classes e.g occupationalclasses e.g occupational
19. 1919
Social Class in PakistanSocial Class in Pakistan
Sociologist are not agreed as to how social Classes Should beSociologist are not agreed as to how social Classes Should be
Distinguished.Distinguished.
Most Commonly, 5 Classes are Identified:Most Commonly, 5 Classes are Identified:
• Upper ClassUpper Class
• Upper-Middle ClassUpper-Middle Class
• Lower-Middle ClassLower-Middle Class
• Working ClassWorking Class
• Lower ClassLower Class
Each of these Classes represent Differences is both Income andEach of these Classes represent Differences is both Income and
Lifestyle Characteristics .Lifestyle Characteristics .
Consequence- having important effect or influence
Longevity- seniority
Childbearing- process of giving birth
Rearing – breeding (reproduction or beating offspring)