In this special Ethics Month webinar, PRSA's Board of Ethics and Professional Standards (BEPS) provided insight and training for public relations professionals on social media ethics and how the PRSA Code of Ethics can help determine the proper course of action and protect you and your clients' reputation and credibility. Current examples of unethical practices in social media were examined. BEPS members also provided guidance on how public relations professionals can ensure their social-media campaigns uphold the ethical standards of the profession.
20. Ellen Hartman, APR, PRSA Fellow Hartman Public Relations Expertise Loyalty
21.
22.
23.
24.
25. Bottom Line: Reputation is based on trust. Profits come from strong reputations. And strong reputations come from doing the right thing.
26.
Editor's Notes
Utilizing a global tragedy for own self-gain Brand may have a history of being provocative but this is simply taking the role of marketing provocateur too far PR Counsel should have stepped into offer more precise and immediate expertise to client Immediate global backlash that was fast and furious throughout many facets, mediums and audiences outside of the KC normal pool Multitude of “fake” Kenneth Cole tweets resulted and (@KennethColePR) popped up linking more disasters to the fashion brand, similar to what occurred to BP during the Gulf spill, all horribly offensive Not first time – Kenneth Cole has inappropriately miss stepped similarly previously in similar fashion PR counsel should have had such scenarios on their radar from past history Expertise should have been part of SM on-going corporate training, including CEO Should have used expertise to advise immediate address Kenneth Cole issued personal apology that was long in coming (six hours) and a bit on the light side that furthered more negative comment “ We weren’t intending to make light of a serious situation. We understand the sensitivity of this historic moment.. KC” Should have simply and immediately apologized, sincerely, and moved on 24/7 news cycle is gone replaced by 60-second news cycle Backlash continued because of the level of insincerity interpreted by social media audiences With more than 11,000+ followers on Twitter, engagement recommendation should have been a critical component of counsel expertise to accompany the apology
Wrong post to the wrong account (meant as a personal tweet, instead sent to 270,000 followers @Redcross corporate account) Immediate and HUMAN response to loyal audience diverted disaster “ We’ve deleted the rogue tweet but rest assured the Red Cross is sober and we’ve confiscated the keys” Swift, human and humorous approach brought out loyal customers and actually is credited with increasing Red Cross donations Red Cross took their apology further by writing an immediate blog post that acknowledged their mistake “ While we’re a 130-year-old humanitarian organization, we’re also made up of human beings. Thanks for not only getting that but for turning our faux pas into something good” Red Cross Blog Excellent recommendation by PR SM staff that deleting the post was not enough to hide the damage – needed to address to their loyal following Likewise, collaborative counsel of RC and Brewer staff resulted in other tweeters, especially the Brewer’s fans to launch a fundraising effort and blood donation drive for Red Cross via a hash tag; #gettingslizzard SM community and Facebook fans turned the mistweet into a rallying cause Solidified current audience and prompted new loyal following Local bars across country entered the fray by offering “beer-for-blood” promotions Show you’ve donated a pint @redcross today & we’ll buy you a pint of @Dogfishbeer Recommendations by PR SM staff of making the human connection was spot on as was recommendation to engage by driving and connecting donors to the charity from both the Red Cross site and also the Brewer’s site – created literally a donation parade Even Hootsuite, the mistakenly utilized SM outlet of the original rogue tweet donated SM world understands no one is perfect, however, they will notice when a company isn’t responsible for its mistakes
Corporately, on a global level, there is a crisis of confidence and trust between businesses and consumers Process: ID the ethical issue or conflict Determine internal/external factors likely to influence decisions Choose key PRSA values that apply Consider audiences impacted by decision + obligations/responsibilities to each Select ethical principle(s) to guide decision Important because: (Reiterate earlier statement) Trust is like the air we breathe. When it’s present, nobody really notices. But when it’s absent, everybody notices.” -- Warren Buffett Ethical behavior and actions are the foundation of a successful business. The PR practitioner’s role in guiding these decisions and principles, both in day-to-day activities and in times of conflict or crisis, is on-going and can make the difference between long-term achievement and immediate, devastating failure. Transparency is critical in today’s fast-paced, information-access and situation-sharing world, especially when faced with difficult situations (Turn to Keith for Q & A and demonstration of resources on the ethics Web page)