Slide share wheretopublish2015
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•1,277 views
This document from La Trobe University discusses factors to consider when selecting journals for publication, including publishing in high impact journals relevant to one's discipline, and identifying journals using metrics like impact factors and indexing. It recommends evaluating journals based on quantitative metrics as well as qualitative factors like relevance and peer review process. Resources for checking journal metrics and quality include Journal Citation Reports, Eigenfactor, and Scopus Journal Analyzer.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Slide share wheretopublish2015
Where to publish : evaluating journals including Journal Impact Factors, Indexing and Abstracting Services, relevance to your discipline, peer review process, ranking within your discipline
My Research Impact
This document discusses citation analysis and metrics for measuring research impact, including citation count, h-index, and altmetrics. It explains that citation analysis tools measure how often a researcher's published work has been cited by others, and that citation count and h-index are commonly used metrics. However, it notes limitations in relying on any single tool or metric and cautions that interpretation depends on factors like discipline and time publishing. The document encourages researchers to use multiple tools and social media to increase their visibility and influence.
InCites
This document provides information about InCites Research Performance Profiles from Thomson Reuters, which allows users to create customized reports and dataset reports about research output and impact. It can be used to analyze an institution's publication profile, researcher productivity, collaboration networks, subject specializations, trends over time, and citation impact. The document explains how to access InCites through the La Trobe University library and create customized reports for authors and overall datasets.
Where to Publish
This document from La Trobe University provides guidance on publishing research in scholarly journals. It discusses the main issues to consider like publishing in high impact journals relevant to one's discipline. It recommends evaluating journals using criteria like impact factors, indexing, and peer review process. It also describes journal metrics that are used to evaluate journal quality, like Journal Citation Reports and Scopus Journal Analyzer, and provides further resources for checking journals.
Where to Publish: evaluating journals
This document from La Trobe University discusses factors to consider when selecting journals to publish research in, such as choosing high impact journals relevant to one's discipline. It identifies the main issues like publishing in quality journals, selecting those relevant to one's focus area, and where other experts publish. It recommends evaluating journals using criteria like impact factors, indexing, relevance, rankings, and peer review process. It also provides resources one can use to check journals, such as Journal Citation Reports, Eigenfactor, Scopus Journal Analyzer, and university research support services.
Google Scholar Citation Analysis
Google Scholar Citations allows researchers to track citations to their publications. It provides metrics like citations over time and who is citing an author's work. Setting up a profile is quick and easy - researchers can login with their Google account, add their publications, and make their profile public. Profile and citation records are automatically updated as Google Scholar indexes new information. The tool helps authors explore citations, follow new citations, and set alerts to new references to their work.
Publish or Perish
Publish or Perish is a free software program that uses data from Google Scholar to provide citation metrics and statistics about researchers' work, including the total number of papers and citations, the h-index and g-index. It allows you to search for authors to analyze their impact. The h-index quantifies both productivity and citation impact by calculating the number of papers with at least that number of citations.
Journal Impact Metrics
This document discusses strategies for selecting high-impact journals for publication. It notes that tenure requirements often emphasize publications with national or international impact. It then explains common metrics for measuring journal impact, including Impact Factor from Journal Citation Reports. Alternative metrics from Scopus like SJR and SNIP are also discussed. The document compares journal ranking sources and their disciplinary coverage, and notes other data to consider beyond impact metrics, like acceptance rates. It concludes by offering help from the author in selecting journals.
Recommended
Slide share wheretopublish2015
Where to publish : evaluating journals including Journal Impact Factors, Indexing and Abstracting Services, relevance to your discipline, peer review process, ranking within your discipline
My Research Impact
This document discusses citation analysis and metrics for measuring research impact, including citation count, h-index, and altmetrics. It explains that citation analysis tools measure how often a researcher's published work has been cited by others, and that citation count and h-index are commonly used metrics. However, it notes limitations in relying on any single tool or metric and cautions that interpretation depends on factors like discipline and time publishing. The document encourages researchers to use multiple tools and social media to increase their visibility and influence.
InCites
This document provides information about InCites Research Performance Profiles from Thomson Reuters, which allows users to create customized reports and dataset reports about research output and impact. It can be used to analyze an institution's publication profile, researcher productivity, collaboration networks, subject specializations, trends over time, and citation impact. The document explains how to access InCites through the La Trobe University library and create customized reports for authors and overall datasets.
Where to Publish
This document from La Trobe University provides guidance on publishing research in scholarly journals. It discusses the main issues to consider like publishing in high impact journals relevant to one's discipline. It recommends evaluating journals using criteria like impact factors, indexing, and peer review process. It also describes journal metrics that are used to evaluate journal quality, like Journal Citation Reports and Scopus Journal Analyzer, and provides further resources for checking journals.
Where to Publish: evaluating journals
This document from La Trobe University discusses factors to consider when selecting journals to publish research in, such as choosing high impact journals relevant to one's discipline. It identifies the main issues like publishing in quality journals, selecting those relevant to one's focus area, and where other experts publish. It recommends evaluating journals using criteria like impact factors, indexing, relevance, rankings, and peer review process. It also provides resources one can use to check journals, such as Journal Citation Reports, Eigenfactor, Scopus Journal Analyzer, and university research support services.
Google Scholar Citation Analysis
Google Scholar Citations allows researchers to track citations to their publications. It provides metrics like citations over time and who is citing an author's work. Setting up a profile is quick and easy - researchers can login with their Google account, add their publications, and make their profile public. Profile and citation records are automatically updated as Google Scholar indexes new information. The tool helps authors explore citations, follow new citations, and set alerts to new references to their work.
Publish or Perish
Publish or Perish is a free software program that uses data from Google Scholar to provide citation metrics and statistics about researchers' work, including the total number of papers and citations, the h-index and g-index. It allows you to search for authors to analyze their impact. The h-index quantifies both productivity and citation impact by calculating the number of papers with at least that number of citations.
Journal Impact Metrics
This document discusses strategies for selecting high-impact journals for publication. It notes that tenure requirements often emphasize publications with national or international impact. It then explains common metrics for measuring journal impact, including Impact Factor from Journal Citation Reports. Alternative metrics from Scopus like SJR and SNIP are also discussed. The document compares journal ranking sources and their disciplinary coverage, and notes other data to consider beyond impact metrics, like acceptance rates. It concludes by offering help from the author in selecting journals.
Resources for measuring and maximizing research impact fall 2015
This document provides resources for measuring and maximizing research impact, including making strategic publication decisions, maximizing exposure of research, and utilizing tools to track scholarly impact and engagement. It discusses finding journal impact rankings, considering open access, engaging abstracts and keywords, and using scholarly networks and tools like Google Scholar, ResearchGate, and ORCID to maximize exposure and track metrics. The librarian providing this information notes that impact should be considered in the context of individual department guidelines.
STS Hot Topics Midwinter 2014 altmetrics presentation
Altmetrics are a new way to measure the impact of research using data points beyond traditional citation counts, such as social media mentions, downloads, views. They provide a more comprehensive view of impact by capturing mentions of research outputs beyond journals, including presentations, blogs, and datasets. However, altmetrics are still developing and face criticisms around being easier to artificially inflate and concerns about understanding their methodology and context.
Freely Available Scholarly Metrics
This document provides an overview of bibliometric metrics for evaluating scholarly work, including both freely available and paid subscription metrics. It discusses journal-level metrics like impact factor, acceptance rates, and Scimago rankings. Article-level metrics mentioned include citations, downloads, and Altmetric scores. Author-level metrics like the h-index are also covered. Paid bibliometrics from Web of Science and Scopus are noted. Freely available options highlighted are Google Scholar for citations, rankings, and profiles, as well as Scimago for journal rankings. Caveats about the limitations of metrics are also summarized.
Mining Research Publication Networks for Impact -- KMi Internal Seminar
This document discusses a PhD research project that aims to evaluate the quality of research publications. It outlines limitations of current peer review and bibliometric methods for evaluating quality. The research will analyze publication networks and full texts to identify factors influencing quality and develop new quality evaluation methods. The goals are to create metrics that are more accurate, understandable, resistant to manipulation and faster than citations. The research involves collecting publication data from various sources, analyzing networks and text, and developing composite metrics to estimate quality for different disciplines.
Judging research quality bibliometrics and beyond
This document summarizes and discusses various methods for judging research quality, including bibliometrics and alternative approaches. It discusses bibliometrics such as impact factors and how they are calculated. However, it notes that bibliometrics only measure one dimension of quality and do not reflect the broader societal impacts of research. The document advocates considering additional factors beyond citation counts, such as qualitative evaluations and altmetrics, to more fully capture research quality.
Your Research Impact
Existing Impact factors are heavily criticized as measures of scientific quality. However,they are still used to select candidates for positions or consider during promotion of academic staff or grant application processes. As a consequence, researchers tend to adapt their publication strategy to avoid negative impact on their careers. The presenter, a researcher and a librarian. describes the existing metrics and shows how to improve alternative impact factors.
Citation & altmetrics - a comparison
comparison of metrics for scholarly products, created in 2012 by Kellie Kaneshiro & Heather Coates, updated 2014
Academic Library & Scholarly Communicationc: from a strategy to an action plan
The presentation for academic librarians on developing a strategy and an action plan to support scholarly communication in a research university
Who's counting: an introduction to bibliometrics
Presentation from a University of York Library workshop on bibliometrics. The session covers how published research outputs are measured at the article, author and journal level; with discussion of the limitations of a bibliometric approach.
Measuring the Research Impact
1) Citation analysis is used to measure the impact and quality of scholarly works by counting how often they have been cited by other works. It can be used to analyze articles, authors, journals, and more.
2) Several citation indexing databases and tools exist to perform citation analysis, including Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Each has its own strengths and weaknesses in terms of coverage and capabilities.
3) Citation analysis data can provide information on the number of papers an author has published, how often their work has been cited, and their h-index score, which considers both productivity and citation impact.
Bibliometrics and research impact workshop in the scienes and engineering fields
This presentation gives an introduction to researchers in the sciences and engineering about bibliometrics. It also recommends ways to increase impact of published and non-published works.
Bibliometrics in the library
This document discusses the use of bibliometrics and citation analysis at Wageningen University. It provides context about the university's evaluation cycle and criteria. It then describes the current research information system (Metis) and institutional repository (Wageningen Yield) that provide publication data. The document discusses challenges in comparing citation metrics across fields and researchers. It also considers sources of citation data and developing altmetric tools. Finally, it argues that the university library is well-positioned to conduct bibliometric analyses using these local data systems.
Dent4104 OneSearch and EBP 2017
This slideshare is from a lecture given to DENT4104 students beginning UWA's Doctor of Medical Dentistry. It introduces some basis OneSearch Library catalogue functions and introduces the notion of Evidence Based Practice.
Altmetrics 101 - Altmetrics in Libraries
LITA’s Altmetrics and Digital Analytics Interest Group is proud to present Heather Coates, Richard Naples, and Lauren Collister in our second free webinar of the season. Heather will introduce the concept of altmetrics with a quick "Altmetrics 101," Richard will discuss the Smithsonian's implementation of Altmetric, and Lauren will share the University of Pittsburgh's experience with Plum Analytics.
Measuring research impact with bibliometrics
Updated 30/01/2015
This session included discussions around the value of bibliometrics for individual performance management/promotion and the REF.
What are bibliometrics?
Journal metrics
Personal metrics
Article level metrics and altmetrics
Bibliometric Tools
This document discusses bibliometric tools that can be used to analyze scholarly literature and research impact. It explains that bibliometrics involves the quantitative analysis of bibliographic items like citations, authors, and keywords. Individual researchers and institutions can use bibliometric tools to evaluate research impact, identify collaborators, analyze journal metrics, and inform hiring and funding decisions. It provides examples of bibliometric databases like Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar that contain citation data and metrics. Finally, it notes some limitations of bibliometric indicators and the need to consider citation behaviors and contexts across disciplines.
Scholarly Metrics Bootcamp USAIN 2014 Pre-conference workshop
This document provides an overview of scholarly metrics and bibliometrics tools. It discusses the purpose of metrics in evaluating scholarship given the large volume of publications. It covers common article, journal, and author-level metrics including times cited, impact factor, H-index, and altmetrics. The workshop demonstrates hands-on training with bibliometric databases and tools like Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Journal Citation Reports, and Publish or Perish. It emphasizes that no single metric can evaluate quality and that metrics must be considered in the appropriate disciplinary context. The document aims to help librarians and scholars appropriately use and interpret bibliometric data.
Metrics: what they are and how to use them
This document discusses different metrics used to measure research impact, including bibliometrics, altmetrics, journal impact factors, and h-indexes. It notes that while metrics are used to evaluate research, there are also issues with their use such as gaming the system or inappropriately applying metrics. The document advocates for responsible use of metrics and considers alternatives like the Leiden Manifesto and San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.
Gathering Evidence to Demonstrate Impact
IUPUI Office of Academic Affairs & University Library workshop (2012) on gathering evidence for promotion and tenure dossiers.
Bibliometrics
Presentation of findings on Bibliometrics; description, methods with examples, advantages and disadvantages. Methods: Citation counts, Publication counts, H-index and Journal Impact Factor (JIF).
Resources used are shared, please use them.
Scopus Journals
This document provides guidelines for selecting the appropriate journal to submit research for publication. It discusses exploring a journal's aims and scope, checking if similar articles have been published, considering restrictions and impact factor. Online tools are presented to help identify journals. Common reasons for manuscript rejection are outlined. The importance of thoroughly responding to reviewer comments is emphasized.
How to select a journal to publish Article
This document discusses factors to consider when selecting a journal to publish an article. It begins by defining publication and its importance in research. It then covers different types of journals such as open access, subscription-based, and predatory journals. The main part of the document outlines key factors that affect journal selection, including journal characteristics, performance, acceptance rates, and manuscript characteristics. Journal characteristics include quality, indexing, peer review process, publisher reputation, and editorial board. Authors should also consider the journal's publication cycle, review timelines, and author resources. Finally, the likelihood of acceptance may depend on the author's affiliation and country, as well as ensuring the manuscript fits the aims and scope of the journal.
More Related Content
What's hot
Resources for measuring and maximizing research impact fall 2015
This document provides resources for measuring and maximizing research impact, including making strategic publication decisions, maximizing exposure of research, and utilizing tools to track scholarly impact and engagement. It discusses finding journal impact rankings, considering open access, engaging abstracts and keywords, and using scholarly networks and tools like Google Scholar, ResearchGate, and ORCID to maximize exposure and track metrics. The librarian providing this information notes that impact should be considered in the context of individual department guidelines.
STS Hot Topics Midwinter 2014 altmetrics presentation
Altmetrics are a new way to measure the impact of research using data points beyond traditional citation counts, such as social media mentions, downloads, views. They provide a more comprehensive view of impact by capturing mentions of research outputs beyond journals, including presentations, blogs, and datasets. However, altmetrics are still developing and face criticisms around being easier to artificially inflate and concerns about understanding their methodology and context.
Freely Available Scholarly Metrics
This document provides an overview of bibliometric metrics for evaluating scholarly work, including both freely available and paid subscription metrics. It discusses journal-level metrics like impact factor, acceptance rates, and Scimago rankings. Article-level metrics mentioned include citations, downloads, and Altmetric scores. Author-level metrics like the h-index are also covered. Paid bibliometrics from Web of Science and Scopus are noted. Freely available options highlighted are Google Scholar for citations, rankings, and profiles, as well as Scimago for journal rankings. Caveats about the limitations of metrics are also summarized.
Mining Research Publication Networks for Impact -- KMi Internal Seminar
This document discusses a PhD research project that aims to evaluate the quality of research publications. It outlines limitations of current peer review and bibliometric methods for evaluating quality. The research will analyze publication networks and full texts to identify factors influencing quality and develop new quality evaluation methods. The goals are to create metrics that are more accurate, understandable, resistant to manipulation and faster than citations. The research involves collecting publication data from various sources, analyzing networks and text, and developing composite metrics to estimate quality for different disciplines.
Judging research quality bibliometrics and beyond
This document summarizes and discusses various methods for judging research quality, including bibliometrics and alternative approaches. It discusses bibliometrics such as impact factors and how they are calculated. However, it notes that bibliometrics only measure one dimension of quality and do not reflect the broader societal impacts of research. The document advocates considering additional factors beyond citation counts, such as qualitative evaluations and altmetrics, to more fully capture research quality.
Your Research Impact
Existing Impact factors are heavily criticized as measures of scientific quality. However,they are still used to select candidates for positions or consider during promotion of academic staff or grant application processes. As a consequence, researchers tend to adapt their publication strategy to avoid negative impact on their careers. The presenter, a researcher and a librarian. describes the existing metrics and shows how to improve alternative impact factors.
Citation & altmetrics - a comparison
comparison of metrics for scholarly products, created in 2012 by Kellie Kaneshiro & Heather Coates, updated 2014
Academic Library & Scholarly Communicationc: from a strategy to an action plan
The presentation for academic librarians on developing a strategy and an action plan to support scholarly communication in a research university
Who's counting: an introduction to bibliometrics
Presentation from a University of York Library workshop on bibliometrics. The session covers how published research outputs are measured at the article, author and journal level; with discussion of the limitations of a bibliometric approach.
Measuring the Research Impact
1) Citation analysis is used to measure the impact and quality of scholarly works by counting how often they have been cited by other works. It can be used to analyze articles, authors, journals, and more.
2) Several citation indexing databases and tools exist to perform citation analysis, including Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Each has its own strengths and weaknesses in terms of coverage and capabilities.
3) Citation analysis data can provide information on the number of papers an author has published, how often their work has been cited, and their h-index score, which considers both productivity and citation impact.
Bibliometrics and research impact workshop in the scienes and engineering fields
This presentation gives an introduction to researchers in the sciences and engineering about bibliometrics. It also recommends ways to increase impact of published and non-published works.
Bibliometrics in the library
This document discusses the use of bibliometrics and citation analysis at Wageningen University. It provides context about the university's evaluation cycle and criteria. It then describes the current research information system (Metis) and institutional repository (Wageningen Yield) that provide publication data. The document discusses challenges in comparing citation metrics across fields and researchers. It also considers sources of citation data and developing altmetric tools. Finally, it argues that the university library is well-positioned to conduct bibliometric analyses using these local data systems.
Dent4104 OneSearch and EBP 2017
This slideshare is from a lecture given to DENT4104 students beginning UWA's Doctor of Medical Dentistry. It introduces some basis OneSearch Library catalogue functions and introduces the notion of Evidence Based Practice.
Altmetrics 101 - Altmetrics in Libraries
LITA’s Altmetrics and Digital Analytics Interest Group is proud to present Heather Coates, Richard Naples, and Lauren Collister in our second free webinar of the season. Heather will introduce the concept of altmetrics with a quick "Altmetrics 101," Richard will discuss the Smithsonian's implementation of Altmetric, and Lauren will share the University of Pittsburgh's experience with Plum Analytics.
Measuring research impact with bibliometrics
Updated 30/01/2015
This session included discussions around the value of bibliometrics for individual performance management/promotion and the REF.
What are bibliometrics?
Journal metrics
Personal metrics
Article level metrics and altmetrics
Bibliometric Tools
This document discusses bibliometric tools that can be used to analyze scholarly literature and research impact. It explains that bibliometrics involves the quantitative analysis of bibliographic items like citations, authors, and keywords. Individual researchers and institutions can use bibliometric tools to evaluate research impact, identify collaborators, analyze journal metrics, and inform hiring and funding decisions. It provides examples of bibliometric databases like Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar that contain citation data and metrics. Finally, it notes some limitations of bibliometric indicators and the need to consider citation behaviors and contexts across disciplines.
Scholarly Metrics Bootcamp USAIN 2014 Pre-conference workshop
This document provides an overview of scholarly metrics and bibliometrics tools. It discusses the purpose of metrics in evaluating scholarship given the large volume of publications. It covers common article, journal, and author-level metrics including times cited, impact factor, H-index, and altmetrics. The workshop demonstrates hands-on training with bibliometric databases and tools like Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Journal Citation Reports, and Publish or Perish. It emphasizes that no single metric can evaluate quality and that metrics must be considered in the appropriate disciplinary context. The document aims to help librarians and scholars appropriately use and interpret bibliometric data.
Metrics: what they are and how to use them
This document discusses different metrics used to measure research impact, including bibliometrics, altmetrics, journal impact factors, and h-indexes. It notes that while metrics are used to evaluate research, there are also issues with their use such as gaming the system or inappropriately applying metrics. The document advocates for responsible use of metrics and considers alternatives like the Leiden Manifesto and San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.
Gathering Evidence to Demonstrate Impact
IUPUI Office of Academic Affairs & University Library workshop (2012) on gathering evidence for promotion and tenure dossiers.
Bibliometrics
Presentation of findings on Bibliometrics; description, methods with examples, advantages and disadvantages. Methods: Citation counts, Publication counts, H-index and Journal Impact Factor (JIF).
Resources used are shared, please use them.
What's hot (20)
Resources for measuring and maximizing research impact fall 2015
Resources for measuring and maximizing research impact fall 2015
STS Hot Topics Midwinter 2014 altmetrics presentation
STS Hot Topics Midwinter 2014 altmetrics presentation
Mining Research Publication Networks for Impact -- KMi Internal Seminar
Mining Research Publication Networks for Impact -- KMi Internal Seminar
Academic Library & Scholarly Communicationc: from a strategy to an action plan
Academic Library & Scholarly Communicationc: from a strategy to an action plan
Bibliometrics and research impact workshop in the scienes and engineering fields
Bibliometrics and research impact workshop in the scienes and engineering fields
Scholarly Metrics Bootcamp USAIN 2014 Pre-conference workshop
Scholarly Metrics Bootcamp USAIN 2014 Pre-conference workshop
Similar to Slide share wheretopublish2015
Scopus Journals
This document provides guidelines for selecting the appropriate journal to submit research for publication. It discusses exploring a journal's aims and scope, checking if similar articles have been published, considering restrictions and impact factor. Online tools are presented to help identify journals. Common reasons for manuscript rejection are outlined. The importance of thoroughly responding to reviewer comments is emphasized.
How to select a journal to publish Article
This document discusses factors to consider when selecting a journal to publish an article. It begins by defining publication and its importance in research. It then covers different types of journals such as open access, subscription-based, and predatory journals. The main part of the document outlines key factors that affect journal selection, including journal characteristics, performance, acceptance rates, and manuscript characteristics. Journal characteristics include quality, indexing, peer review process, publisher reputation, and editorial board. Authors should also consider the journal's publication cycle, review timelines, and author resources. Finally, the likelihood of acceptance may depend on the author's affiliation and country, as well as ensuring the manuscript fits the aims and scope of the journal.
Virtual training on Academic publishing
Virtual Training conducted by Librarians among Postgraduate students and faculty at Egerton University with an aim of enhancing discoverability of the e-resources that the university subscribes
Quality Assurance for Journal Guidance
Definitions
What is the need for quality assurance in journals ?
Type of journals
Bibliometric indicators
How to identify credible journals ?
Predatory/cloned journals
Questions to ask when choosing a journal for publication of research papers
-What are the sources of possible journal suggestions?
-What are the questions to answer before submitting to a particular journal?
Research Webinar.pptx
This document provides an overview of a webinar on getting published and increasing the chances of success. The webinar will include a presentation on choosing publishing venues, preparing manuscripts, and submitting papers for peer review. It will also feature an open Q&A session. Presenters will discuss challenges facing researchers from developing countries and how to identify predatory journals. The webinar aims to provide guidance to researchers throughout the research cycle.
How to get published while doing a phd
This document provides guidance on publishing while doing a PhD. It addresses four key questions: defining a publishing agenda by considering audience and goals; selecting appropriate journals by evaluating quality, acceptance rates, and fit; following submission guidelines carefully; and managing rights if publishing from thesis work. The document emphasizes strategically matching research with high quality journals, using tools to evaluate journals, and developing a publishing timeline.
How to get published as a PhD student
1. The document provides tips for PhD students on developing a publishing strategy and getting published, including choosing the right journals.
2. It recommends students consider their audience, publishing timeline and goals to develop a strategic publishing agenda and shortlist of suitable journals.
3. Metrics like the Journal Citation Reports and SCImago Journal Rankings can help evaluate journal quality and impact when selecting where to publish. Following submission guidelines and addressing reviewer feedback can also help get published.
Choosing the right journal
The document provides guidance on factors to consider when choosing a journal to publish research, such as the intended audience, journal submission process, funder requirements, metrics, personal experience, and customer service experience. It advises writing the article first before selecting the most suitable journal, and notes that submitting to multiple journals simultaneously is unacceptable. Tools are recommended to help identify reputable journals and avoid predatory publishers that do not provide proper peer review or indexing.
how_to_get_published_-_eifl_training.pptx
This document provides an overview of the academic publishing process. It discusses conducting publishable research, writing papers, choosing journals, adhering to guidelines, preparing submissions, managing peer review, handling revisions, acceptance and rejection. Key steps include refining research questions, conducting thorough literature reviews, using appropriate methodologies, writing for the intended journal, addressing reviewer feedback, and considering alternative journals for rejected papers. The roles and responsibilities of authors and publishers are also outlined.
DOAJ as Gatekeeper for Quality Open Access Journals
Presentation by Dr Tom Olijhoek, Editor-in-Chief, at NEICON/ASEP Conference, May 17, 2016, Moscow, on the status of DOAJ post the shut-down of the reapplication project
Nicola Dowson: Ref2014 and beyond
Presentation from Referencing Reboot: Tools, Tech and Twinkle on 4 June 2014 (English Faculty, University of Cambridge).
Nicola works at the Open University.
ImpactPresentation_HBOI_(1).pptx
This document provides an overview of metrics and tools used to assess scholarly impact and discusses current issues and trends. It covers journal-level metrics like journal impact factor and eigenfactor scores, article-level metrics including citations and altmetrics, and author-level metrics like the h-index. It explains how and where to find these various metrics, and highlights some alternative new metrics and changing expectations around research assessment and demonstrating broader impact.
Publishing in Wiley Materials Science Journals - Wiley (February 2015)
The document discusses publishing in Wiley Materials Science journals. It provides an overview of the editorial process at Wiley, including the roles of various editors, organizers, and technical staff. It also covers what editors look for in determining the suitability of manuscripts, such as whether the topic and results fit the journal's scope. The document advises authors on writing an effective cover letter and conclusions section to maximize the chances of their work being published.
Taylor & francis how to get published
This document provides tips and guidance for publishing academic articles in journals. It discusses choosing the right journal by understanding the audience and aims of different publications. Key steps in the publishing process are outlined, including developing the idea, writing drafts, and working with a critical friend. Peer review and handling reviewer feedback are explained. Ethics in publishing and common reasons for article rejection are also addressed. The overall message is that authors should carefully select the most appropriate journal, follow submission guidelines, and be responsive to the peer review process.
Journal jargon - metrics and beyond
This document discusses various metrics used to evaluate academic journals and research, including impact factor, H-index, indexing, citations, and open access publishing. It describes what academic journals are and their purposes of peer review and sharing new research. It also discusses the rise of predatory journals and how to identify them, as well as advantages and disadvantages of open access publishing. Key metrics for evaluating journals include impact factor, eigenfactor, SJR, and indexing in services like PubMed and Scopus. Metrics for evaluating individual researchers include H-index and citations. The document emphasizes that quality research should be the priority over metrics and impact.
Research and Intellectual Contribution Impact
A presentation on the panoramic dashboard developed at SMC to communicate impact of faculty research. Presented by Dr. Larisa Genin and Sarah Vital at the AACSB Annual Accreditation Conference: Asia Pacific. (Singapore, May 31, 2016)
JCR_Training_for_Researchers.pdf
The document provides information about the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) from Clarivate. It discusses what the JCR is, how it can be used by publishers, librarians, researchers and data scientists, and some of the metrics it includes like impact factor, immediacy index, and cited half-life. It also summarizes some strategies for publishing, including aiming for high ranked journals, journals that are cited for a long time or quickly, and internationally recognized or government accredited journals. Key points are that context is important when using metrics, and the JCR can help evaluate journals and find related publications.
JCR_Training_for_Researchers.pdf
The document provides information about the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) from Clarivate. It discusses what the JCR is, how it can be used by publishers, librarians, researchers and data scientists, and some of the metrics it includes like impact factor, immediacy index, and cited half-life. It also summarizes some strategies for publishing, including aiming for high ranked journals, journals that are cited for a long time or quickly, and internationally recognized or government accredited journals. Key points are that context is important when using metrics, and the JCR can help evaluate journals and find related publications.
Publishing Your Research
Short PowerPoint presentation outlining important things to consider when deciding where to publish your research. This presentation also lists some of the tools that can be used to evaluate journal quality to assist in the publishing decision-making process.
Similar to Slide share wheretopublish2015 (20)
Questions to ask when choosing a journal for publication of research papers
Questions to ask when choosing a journal for publication of research papers
DOAJ as Gatekeeper for Quality Open Access Journals
DOAJ as Gatekeeper for Quality Open Access Journals
Publishing in Wiley Materials Science Journals - Wiley (February 2015)
Publishing in Wiley Materials Science Journals - Wiley (February 2015)
Recently uploaded
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
The Diamonds of 2023-2024 in the IGRA collection
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance.pptx
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS Template 2023-2024 by: Irene S. Rueco
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdTop five deadliest dog breeds in America
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Types of Herbal Cosmetics its standardization.
Physiology and chemistry of skin and pigmentation, hairs, scalp, lips and nail, Cleansing cream, Lotions, Face powders, Face packs, Lipsticks, Bath products, soaps and baby product,
Preparation and standardization of the following : Tonic, Bleaches, Dentifrices and Mouth washes & Tooth Pastes, Cosmetics for Nails.
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcclinical examination of hip joint (1).pdf
described clinical examination all orthopeadic conditions .
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit - NGV Pavilion Concept Design
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Recently uploaded (20)
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance.pptx
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance.pptx
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Slide share wheretopublish2015
- 1. 1La Trobe University Where to Publish: Evaluating Journals latrobe.edu.au/library
- 2. 2La Trobe University What are the main issues? • Publishing in quality, high impact scholarly journals? • Selecting journals relevant to your discipline or research focus? • Where are other experts in your discipline publishing? • Identifying a journal whilst being mindful of ERA, Field of Research (FoR) Codes and impact factors? • Ensuring that your research is reaching relevant audiences?
- 3. 3La Trobe University What quality factors should I check for? • Evaluate journals using a range of criteria and compare with other journals in the same category • Quantitative and qualitative assessments may include: • Journal impact factors • Indexing and abstracting services • Relevance to your discipline • Ranking within your discipline • Peer review process
- 4. 4La Trobe University What are journal metrics? • Used to evaluate the impact or quality of a journal • Journal metrics can be used for: • Grant applications • Promotion & recruitment • Identifying which journal to publish in • Be aware that some disciplines rely less on publishing in journals than others
- 5. 5La Trobe University How can I check? • A range of resources are available: • Journal Citation Reports (JCR) • Eigenfactor calculation • Scopus Journal Analyzer (SJR) • SCImago • InCites • ERA 2015 Journal List • View the Where to Publish LibGuide for further information and instructions on how to use the various journal metric tools
- 6. 6La Trobe University Further help: • Research Education and Development (RED) • latrobe.edu.au/research/red • Research Services • latrobe.edu.au/research-services/ • Contact your Senior Research Advisor