Presentation from Referencing Reboot: Tools, Tech and Twinkle on 4 June 2014 (English Faculty, University of Cambridge).
Nicola works at the Open University.
Sustainability of GEPs and Networks in Research Funding OrganisationsSUPERA project
Presentation held by Jana Dvořáčková (Technology Agency of the Czech Republic) during the Supera Final Conference, organised by SUPERA on 25 March 2022.
Cochrane for Librarians: An update on searching and specialised registersDouglas Salzwedel
Doug Salzwedel discusses his non-traditional career path from librarian to Trials Search Coordinator for the Cochrane Hypertension Review Group. As a Cochrane librarian, his roles include managing the group's specialized register, developing search strategies for authors, and providing search and reference support. He outlines the process of planning, conducting, documenting and reporting systematic review searches to bibliographic databases and other sources. Specialized registers are a key resource for Cochrane, containing controlled trial reports that are screened and added to the Cochrane Register of Studies software.
This document discusses bibliometrics and their use at Cardiff University. It begins with an introduction to bibliometric measures like citations, impact factors, and altmetrics. It then discusses how bibliometric data is presented in Cardiff's institutional repository and how it was used to provide context for research evaluations in the UK's REF2014 assessment exercise. The document concludes by outlining Cardiff's trial of the SciVal analytics tool and plans for a new research information system to better integrate bibliometric and altmetric data.
NISO Virtual Conference: Expanding the Assessment Toolbox: Blending the Old and New Assessment Practices
Definitions for appropriate metrics and calculation methodologies for specific output types Mike Taylor, Senior Product Manager, Informetrics, Elsevier - NISO
"A survey of performance measurement and assessment practice in SCONUL member libraries"
Delivered at the 8th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services.
The document provides feedback on a draft summary report for research evaluation methodology in the Czech Republic. It covers many topics and opinions are divided on several issues. Some view the reports as well-written and justified while others see them as too general. There is contrasting feedback on topics like self-assessment, treatment of PhD students and temporary workers, and assessment of research environment. The document also notes a few incorrect statements in the draft report and provides counterpoints on issues like applied research outputs and dividing duties between teaching and research. It advocates for a learning process to begin in applying the new methodology.
Research evaluation: is it our business?: Librarians in the brave new world of research evaluation by Andria McGrath, Senior Information Specialist, Research Support, King’s College London. Presentation at the Research Evaluation: Is It Our Business? The Role of Librarians in the Brave New World of Research Evaluation 29 June 2011, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Campus.
This document discusses tools and methods for quantitative and qualitative data analysis. It explains the different types of data, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods data. For quantitative analysis, it covers descriptive statistics like measures of central tendency, frequency distributions, and cross-tabulations. Qualitative analysis techniques include thematic coding, word clouds, and abstraction. Specific tools demonstrated include Excel for basic statistics, SurveyMonkey for surveys, and NVivo for advanced qualitative coding. The goal is to help users select the right analysis method and tools based on their data types and objectives.
Sustainability of GEPs and Networks in Research Funding OrganisationsSUPERA project
Presentation held by Jana Dvořáčková (Technology Agency of the Czech Republic) during the Supera Final Conference, organised by SUPERA on 25 March 2022.
Cochrane for Librarians: An update on searching and specialised registersDouglas Salzwedel
Doug Salzwedel discusses his non-traditional career path from librarian to Trials Search Coordinator for the Cochrane Hypertension Review Group. As a Cochrane librarian, his roles include managing the group's specialized register, developing search strategies for authors, and providing search and reference support. He outlines the process of planning, conducting, documenting and reporting systematic review searches to bibliographic databases and other sources. Specialized registers are a key resource for Cochrane, containing controlled trial reports that are screened and added to the Cochrane Register of Studies software.
This document discusses bibliometrics and their use at Cardiff University. It begins with an introduction to bibliometric measures like citations, impact factors, and altmetrics. It then discusses how bibliometric data is presented in Cardiff's institutional repository and how it was used to provide context for research evaluations in the UK's REF2014 assessment exercise. The document concludes by outlining Cardiff's trial of the SciVal analytics tool and plans for a new research information system to better integrate bibliometric and altmetric data.
NISO Virtual Conference: Expanding the Assessment Toolbox: Blending the Old and New Assessment Practices
Definitions for appropriate metrics and calculation methodologies for specific output types Mike Taylor, Senior Product Manager, Informetrics, Elsevier - NISO
"A survey of performance measurement and assessment practice in SCONUL member libraries"
Delivered at the 8th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services.
The document provides feedback on a draft summary report for research evaluation methodology in the Czech Republic. It covers many topics and opinions are divided on several issues. Some view the reports as well-written and justified while others see them as too general. There is contrasting feedback on topics like self-assessment, treatment of PhD students and temporary workers, and assessment of research environment. The document also notes a few incorrect statements in the draft report and provides counterpoints on issues like applied research outputs and dividing duties between teaching and research. It advocates for a learning process to begin in applying the new methodology.
Research evaluation: is it our business?: Librarians in the brave new world of research evaluation by Andria McGrath, Senior Information Specialist, Research Support, King’s College London. Presentation at the Research Evaluation: Is It Our Business? The Role of Librarians in the Brave New World of Research Evaluation 29 June 2011, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Campus.
This document discusses tools and methods for quantitative and qualitative data analysis. It explains the different types of data, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods data. For quantitative analysis, it covers descriptive statistics like measures of central tendency, frequency distributions, and cross-tabulations. Qualitative analysis techniques include thematic coding, word clouds, and abstraction. Specific tools demonstrated include Excel for basic statistics, SurveyMonkey for surveys, and NVivo for advanced qualitative coding. The goal is to help users select the right analysis method and tools based on their data types and objectives.
The document discusses the IPCC process of assessing climate change literature and the experiences of contributing authors. It notes that the IPCC assesses peer-reviewed and grey literature, with authors evaluating quality and validity. Contributing literature should clearly link findings to climate change. Lead authors find literature through extensive searches, conferences, networks, and expert reviewers. Author teams work collaboratively through meetings and online tools to debate findings. The experience provides opportunities to work internationally, gain diverse perspectives, and stimulate further research relevant to policymakers. Early career scientists bring new ideas and perspectives, while the IPCC benefits from their enthusiasm and techniques.
Classifying R&D: Why and How Organizations Develop Taxonomies for Research Fi...CASRAI
All R&D organizations classify their research activities, either implicitly (e.g., by laboratory or department) or explicitly (e.g., by creating taxonomies to define and map research disciplines and domains). However the lack of clear standards for doing so impedes the sharing and aggregation of data on R&D activities. In this workshop, Jeff Alexander and Patrick Lambe will provide an overview of the organizational needs driving the development of a classification of R&D activities, use cases for such a classification, and the potential advantages of international coordination across such classifications. The workshop, based heavily on a study they conducted for the National Center for Science & Engineering Statistics at the U.S. National Science Foundation, will review alternate approaches to both developing R&D classifications, and streamlining the process of classifying research programs and projects. Topics to be covered include examples of international R&D classifications and their development (such as the Australia-New Zealand Standard Research Classification), design principles for R&D classifications, and new automated and semi-automated classification techniques using semantic analysis and machine learning.
Presentation was delivered at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the International Society of Managing & Technical Editors in Washington DC. Provides an overview of Rubriq and the concept of independent peer review in scholarly publishing.
How Do I Know Thee? Let Me Count the Ways: Panel 2: Jeffrey Alexander & Patri...CASRAI
All R&D organizations classify their research activities, either implicitly (e.g., by laboratory or department) or explicitly (e.g., by creating taxonomies to define and map research disciplines and domains). However the lack of clear standards for doing so impedes the sharing and aggregation of data on R&D activities. In this panel the speakers will provide an overview of the organizational needs driving the development of a classification of R&D activities, use cases for such a classification, and the potential advantages of international coordination across such classifications.
This presentation was provided by Martha Kyrillidou of QualityMetrics, LLC during the initial session of the NISO Training Series, Assessment Practices and Metrics for the 21st Century, held on Friday, October 19, 2018.
Understanding impact through alternative metrics: developing library-based as...Kristi Holmes
This document discusses metrics and impact assessment for translational science research. It provides background on translational science, the role of Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs), and the mission of the Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences (NUCATS) Institute to speed research discoveries to patients. The document outlines sample output and impact metrics that could be used for assessment and lists principles to guide an evaluation and continuous improvement program. It also discusses the role of libraries in providing metrics and impact services and outlines the services provided by the Galter Library Metrics and Impact Core at Northwestern University.
This presentation summarizes an approach for classifying research topics based on their momentum and recognition over time in a scientific literature. It uses topic modeling to identify topics in a corpus and two measures of paper recognition - PageRank and RALEX - to calculate topical recognition. Topics are then categorized into three types based on comparisons of their recognition measures over time: persistent topics with lasting recognition, withering topics becoming less recognized, and booming topics gaining recognition recently. The approach aims to provide insights into trends and the evolution of topics within a domain.
Simple title scheme for simpler guideline retrievalAlan Fricker
A simple title scheme was proposed to simplify retrieving guidelines. It focuses document titles on the core topic and activity, removes redundant terms, standardizes document types, and includes the creation date. This scheme was presented to the Clinical Guidance Group who requested its adoption. The new scheme will be applied to new and revised guidance going forward, with potential later changes to existing titles. The goal is to help users quickly locate the guidance needed by improving search and standardizing inconsistent document descriptions.
(1) The document discusses the experiences of the journal "Economics" with open assessment and open citation analysis. It provides an overview of scholarly communication in economics and details about the journal's organization, publication process, and statistics.
(2) The journal uses a two-stage publication process with open assessment, where submissions are published as discussion papers and undergo traditional peer review as well as open review by registered readers. Over 1,900 readers have registered and provided over 500 comments on discussion papers.
(3) Open citation analysis is conducted using the CitEc tool to provide impact information. So far around 20% of discussion papers and journal articles have been cited over 50 times total within the last 6 months. The
Erl presentation march 17 Selecting Open Access Journalsrglazier8
Rhonda Glazier discusses strategies for evaluating and providing access to open access resources. As open access journals are increasing, libraries must determine how to evaluate quality, track changes, and assess stability. Glazier outlines criteria libraries should use to select open access journals that are similar to those used for paid journals. She also provides examples of tools and resources like SPARC and DOAJ that can help with discovery and evaluation. Glazier suggests libraries create decision grids to systematically evaluate journals based on criteria like relevance, stability, and accessibility. Libraries must also decide how to provide access through methods like adding to the catalog or using a link resolver, considering factors like level of commitment and staff resources.
A team of experienced professionals; expert in conducting PhD Research, possess ability to conduct research, design and validate questionnaires, conduct Statistical tests using SPSS, R, Stata, E-Views, perform Meta Analysis or write systematic Literature Review, use Nvivo or other software for qualitative analysis.
Presentation delivered by Elizabeth Gadd [Loughborough University] at Supporting Researchers at Your University event, at Kings Manor, University of York, organised by the Academic and Research Libraries Group Yorkshire and Humberside branch, 18th November 2015
Beyond the Factor: Talking about Research ImpactClaire Stewart
The document discusses the increasing interest in research metrics and impact from funders, publishers, and institutions for purposes such as hiring, promotion, and evaluating proposals, but notes there are significant limitations to current metrics like journal impact factors which vary widely between disciplines and do not capture the full breadth of research outputs and impacts. It advocates for using quantitative metrics to support, not replace, expert review and evaluation of research and capturing a richer array of data on outputs like publications, presentations, and other influences on knowledge and society to more fully understand a researcher's impact.
The document summarizes a study on supporting engineering students in developing skills for communicating research plans. It discusses how earlier studies found students needed help with referencing, writing, and using library databases. The intervention provided students with an online resource to help narrow topics, embedded library and writing workshops, and peer review circles. Assessment results showed students significantly improved their research proposals after participating in the scaffolded academic skills program with support from the library, language, and academic specialists.
National Center for Academic & Dissertation ExcellenceJamie_Patterson
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology introduces their National Center for Academic and Dissertation Excellence and its services to dissertators.
Supporting Bibliometrics by Jenny Delasalle, Academic Support Manager (Research), University of Warwick. Presentation at the Research Evaluation: Is It Our Business? The Role of Librarians in the Brave New World of Research Evaluation 29 June 2011, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Campus.
International comparisons in senior secondary assessmentsOfqual Slideshare
Ofqual conducts research on international comparisons of senior secondary assessments taken by students prior to university entrance. The research involves analyzing assessments in chemistry, English, history and mathematics from different international systems. Emerging findings show variations between assessments in topics covered, question types, and skills evaluated. The goal is to understand effective assessment models and ensure England's A Levels continue to properly prepare students for university.
This document discusses skills related to inquiry and evidence that effective education leaders use and that EdD candidates need. It notes that leaders request and use data from others rather than conducting their own research. EdD programs generally require a dissertation involving empirical research. The document proposes a three-course sequence at the University of Colorado Denver to teach necessary inquiry skills, covering conceiving studies, data collection, and analysis. This is intended to balance preparing students for leadership and completing a dissertation capstone project.
Learn more about peer review from the perspectives of an Editor-in-Chief, Online Publishing Systems Administrator, Associate Editor, Associate Editor Mentee and a Reviewer.
The document discusses key points about what makes research outputs eligible for submission to the UK's Research Excellence Framework (REF) assessment. It dispels common myths, such as the importance of journal impact factors or citation counts. The core REF assessment criteria of originality, significance, and rigor are emphasized. The peer review process is described as independent and ensuring anonymity. Tips are provided for writing REF-eligible papers, such as using appropriate guidelines and conveying messages clearly. The timing of research, publication, and submission processes is outlined in preparation for the 2022 REF.
Presentation on Software process improvement in GSDRafi Ullah
This document summarizes a presentation on barriers to software process improvement (SPI) in global software development (GSD) from both a client and vendor perspective. A systematic literature review identified 22 barriers to SPI implementation in GSD environments. An empirical study using a survey questionnaire of 93 experts identified the same barriers and found that time pressure, organizational politics, and lack of a formal SPI methodology were the most significant barriers. Nine critical barriers were identified based on being present in over 50% of both the literature and empirical study. The barriers were then categorized into a framework with six categories related to SPI implementation in GSD.
The document discusses the IPCC process of assessing climate change literature and the experiences of contributing authors. It notes that the IPCC assesses peer-reviewed and grey literature, with authors evaluating quality and validity. Contributing literature should clearly link findings to climate change. Lead authors find literature through extensive searches, conferences, networks, and expert reviewers. Author teams work collaboratively through meetings and online tools to debate findings. The experience provides opportunities to work internationally, gain diverse perspectives, and stimulate further research relevant to policymakers. Early career scientists bring new ideas and perspectives, while the IPCC benefits from their enthusiasm and techniques.
Classifying R&D: Why and How Organizations Develop Taxonomies for Research Fi...CASRAI
All R&D organizations classify their research activities, either implicitly (e.g., by laboratory or department) or explicitly (e.g., by creating taxonomies to define and map research disciplines and domains). However the lack of clear standards for doing so impedes the sharing and aggregation of data on R&D activities. In this workshop, Jeff Alexander and Patrick Lambe will provide an overview of the organizational needs driving the development of a classification of R&D activities, use cases for such a classification, and the potential advantages of international coordination across such classifications. The workshop, based heavily on a study they conducted for the National Center for Science & Engineering Statistics at the U.S. National Science Foundation, will review alternate approaches to both developing R&D classifications, and streamlining the process of classifying research programs and projects. Topics to be covered include examples of international R&D classifications and their development (such as the Australia-New Zealand Standard Research Classification), design principles for R&D classifications, and new automated and semi-automated classification techniques using semantic analysis and machine learning.
Presentation was delivered at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the International Society of Managing & Technical Editors in Washington DC. Provides an overview of Rubriq and the concept of independent peer review in scholarly publishing.
How Do I Know Thee? Let Me Count the Ways: Panel 2: Jeffrey Alexander & Patri...CASRAI
All R&D organizations classify their research activities, either implicitly (e.g., by laboratory or department) or explicitly (e.g., by creating taxonomies to define and map research disciplines and domains). However the lack of clear standards for doing so impedes the sharing and aggregation of data on R&D activities. In this panel the speakers will provide an overview of the organizational needs driving the development of a classification of R&D activities, use cases for such a classification, and the potential advantages of international coordination across such classifications.
This presentation was provided by Martha Kyrillidou of QualityMetrics, LLC during the initial session of the NISO Training Series, Assessment Practices and Metrics for the 21st Century, held on Friday, October 19, 2018.
Understanding impact through alternative metrics: developing library-based as...Kristi Holmes
This document discusses metrics and impact assessment for translational science research. It provides background on translational science, the role of Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs), and the mission of the Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences (NUCATS) Institute to speed research discoveries to patients. The document outlines sample output and impact metrics that could be used for assessment and lists principles to guide an evaluation and continuous improvement program. It also discusses the role of libraries in providing metrics and impact services and outlines the services provided by the Galter Library Metrics and Impact Core at Northwestern University.
This presentation summarizes an approach for classifying research topics based on their momentum and recognition over time in a scientific literature. It uses topic modeling to identify topics in a corpus and two measures of paper recognition - PageRank and RALEX - to calculate topical recognition. Topics are then categorized into three types based on comparisons of their recognition measures over time: persistent topics with lasting recognition, withering topics becoming less recognized, and booming topics gaining recognition recently. The approach aims to provide insights into trends and the evolution of topics within a domain.
Simple title scheme for simpler guideline retrievalAlan Fricker
A simple title scheme was proposed to simplify retrieving guidelines. It focuses document titles on the core topic and activity, removes redundant terms, standardizes document types, and includes the creation date. This scheme was presented to the Clinical Guidance Group who requested its adoption. The new scheme will be applied to new and revised guidance going forward, with potential later changes to existing titles. The goal is to help users quickly locate the guidance needed by improving search and standardizing inconsistent document descriptions.
(1) The document discusses the experiences of the journal "Economics" with open assessment and open citation analysis. It provides an overview of scholarly communication in economics and details about the journal's organization, publication process, and statistics.
(2) The journal uses a two-stage publication process with open assessment, where submissions are published as discussion papers and undergo traditional peer review as well as open review by registered readers. Over 1,900 readers have registered and provided over 500 comments on discussion papers.
(3) Open citation analysis is conducted using the CitEc tool to provide impact information. So far around 20% of discussion papers and journal articles have been cited over 50 times total within the last 6 months. The
Erl presentation march 17 Selecting Open Access Journalsrglazier8
Rhonda Glazier discusses strategies for evaluating and providing access to open access resources. As open access journals are increasing, libraries must determine how to evaluate quality, track changes, and assess stability. Glazier outlines criteria libraries should use to select open access journals that are similar to those used for paid journals. She also provides examples of tools and resources like SPARC and DOAJ that can help with discovery and evaluation. Glazier suggests libraries create decision grids to systematically evaluate journals based on criteria like relevance, stability, and accessibility. Libraries must also decide how to provide access through methods like adding to the catalog or using a link resolver, considering factors like level of commitment and staff resources.
A team of experienced professionals; expert in conducting PhD Research, possess ability to conduct research, design and validate questionnaires, conduct Statistical tests using SPSS, R, Stata, E-Views, perform Meta Analysis or write systematic Literature Review, use Nvivo or other software for qualitative analysis.
Presentation delivered by Elizabeth Gadd [Loughborough University] at Supporting Researchers at Your University event, at Kings Manor, University of York, organised by the Academic and Research Libraries Group Yorkshire and Humberside branch, 18th November 2015
Beyond the Factor: Talking about Research ImpactClaire Stewart
The document discusses the increasing interest in research metrics and impact from funders, publishers, and institutions for purposes such as hiring, promotion, and evaluating proposals, but notes there are significant limitations to current metrics like journal impact factors which vary widely between disciplines and do not capture the full breadth of research outputs and impacts. It advocates for using quantitative metrics to support, not replace, expert review and evaluation of research and capturing a richer array of data on outputs like publications, presentations, and other influences on knowledge and society to more fully understand a researcher's impact.
The document summarizes a study on supporting engineering students in developing skills for communicating research plans. It discusses how earlier studies found students needed help with referencing, writing, and using library databases. The intervention provided students with an online resource to help narrow topics, embedded library and writing workshops, and peer review circles. Assessment results showed students significantly improved their research proposals after participating in the scaffolded academic skills program with support from the library, language, and academic specialists.
National Center for Academic & Dissertation ExcellenceJamie_Patterson
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology introduces their National Center for Academic and Dissertation Excellence and its services to dissertators.
Supporting Bibliometrics by Jenny Delasalle, Academic Support Manager (Research), University of Warwick. Presentation at the Research Evaluation: Is It Our Business? The Role of Librarians in the Brave New World of Research Evaluation 29 June 2011, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Campus.
International comparisons in senior secondary assessmentsOfqual Slideshare
Ofqual conducts research on international comparisons of senior secondary assessments taken by students prior to university entrance. The research involves analyzing assessments in chemistry, English, history and mathematics from different international systems. Emerging findings show variations between assessments in topics covered, question types, and skills evaluated. The goal is to understand effective assessment models and ensure England's A Levels continue to properly prepare students for university.
This document discusses skills related to inquiry and evidence that effective education leaders use and that EdD candidates need. It notes that leaders request and use data from others rather than conducting their own research. EdD programs generally require a dissertation involving empirical research. The document proposes a three-course sequence at the University of Colorado Denver to teach necessary inquiry skills, covering conceiving studies, data collection, and analysis. This is intended to balance preparing students for leadership and completing a dissertation capstone project.
Learn more about peer review from the perspectives of an Editor-in-Chief, Online Publishing Systems Administrator, Associate Editor, Associate Editor Mentee and a Reviewer.
The document discusses key points about what makes research outputs eligible for submission to the UK's Research Excellence Framework (REF) assessment. It dispels common myths, such as the importance of journal impact factors or citation counts. The core REF assessment criteria of originality, significance, and rigor are emphasized. The peer review process is described as independent and ensuring anonymity. Tips are provided for writing REF-eligible papers, such as using appropriate guidelines and conveying messages clearly. The timing of research, publication, and submission processes is outlined in preparation for the 2022 REF.
Presentation on Software process improvement in GSDRafi Ullah
This document summarizes a presentation on barriers to software process improvement (SPI) in global software development (GSD) from both a client and vendor perspective. A systematic literature review identified 22 barriers to SPI implementation in GSD environments. An empirical study using a survey questionnaire of 93 experts identified the same barriers and found that time pressure, organizational politics, and lack of a formal SPI methodology were the most significant barriers. Nine critical barriers were identified based on being present in over 50% of both the literature and empirical study. The barriers were then categorized into a framework with six categories related to SPI implementation in GSD.
Presentation by Dr Tom Olijhoek, Editor-in-Chief, at NEICON/ASEP Conference, May 17, 2016, Moscow, on the status of DOAJ post the shut-down of the reapplication project
This document from La Trobe University discusses factors to consider when selecting journals to publish research in, such as choosing high impact journals relevant to one's discipline. It identifies the main issues like publishing in quality journals, selecting those relevant to one's focus area, and where other experts publish. It recommends evaluating journals using criteria like impact factors, indexing, relevance, rankings, and peer review process. It also provides resources one can use to check journals, such as Journal Citation Reports, Eigenfactor, Scopus Journal Analyzer, and university research support services.
Creating and Maintaining a Sustainable Research Data Management Service: Wher...ARLGSW
The document discusses research data management (RDM) issues at the University of Exeter. It provides an overview of the Open Exeter Project which aims to address RDM challenges through various work strands including advocacy, technical development of an institutional data archive, and training programs. The document notes that RDM training for researchers should cover topics like data management plans, file organization, and ethical issues. It also discusses the role of librarians in RDM, highlighting how their role is changing to involve more expertise in managing research information and data throughout the research process. For long-term sustainability, RDM needs institutional support and policies that incentivize open access and inter-disciplinary collaboration.
The document discusses the need to reform the Czech Republic's research evaluation methodology to improve performance and competitiveness. It outlines the objectives to develop a new national evaluation methodology that provides strategic information to all levels of the research system and informs institutional funding. The new methodology is based on several key principles: it reflects strategic policy objectives; uses comprehensive peer review of research units; and aims to be fair, cost-effective, and anchored at the international level. The methodology assesses research excellence, performance, societal relevance and institutional potential through peer judgements rather than calculations. Evaluation results will inform funding allocation and provide strategic feedback to research organizations and policymakers.
This document summarizes different approaches used to effectively present evidence from research to policymakers. It discusses challenges policymakers face in using evidence, such as finding relevant research and interpreting research language. It then describes several methods used by organizations to help address these challenges, including providing easier access to research through summaries, syntheses, and online registries. The document examines these evidence presentation approaches used by organizations like NICE, Health Evidence, and Health Systems Evidence, highlighting their roles, products, and methods of dissemination. It concludes by reflecting on key learnings around being responsive to emerging evidence needs and using different lenses to analyze agencies' evidence needs.
This document provides an overview of various abstracting and indexing services including Thomson Reuters (ISI), PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic Search, and Scopus/EI Compendex. It describes the application and evaluation process for each service, what databases and indexes they contain, and how journals can improve metrics like the Impact Factor. Guidelines are provided for optimizing discoverability in these services to increase citations and rankings.
1. Probation assessment is a formal review process that typically occurs 9-12 months into a PhD program for full-time students or 16-22 months for part-time students. It involves submitting a probation report, presenting one's research orally, and participating in a mini-viva.
2. The goals of probation assessment are to review student progress outside of supervision, provide documentation of progress, allow students to communicate their research to others in their field, and provide additional evaluation to support student progress.
3. Key components of a successful probation include developing a clear research question, conducting a critical literature review to identify gaps and situate one's work, proposing a feasible and rigorous research methodology, and
The document summarizes the panel evaluation process and results for research units in the Czech Republic. It describes the governance structure, which includes main panels, subject panels, and referees to evaluate research units. The evaluation process involves subject panels assessing research units against criteria, referees assessing submitted research outputs, and main panels overseeing procedures. Conflicts of interest are avoided through independent international experts and transparency. Evaluation results provide a summative assessment for funding and formative feedback to support research and development governance. Lessons from a small pilot evaluation identified areas for improving data quality and communication to aid expert assessment.
This document discusses implementing ORCID identifiers at Northumbria University. It describes Northumbria as a research-rich university with over 1,300 academic staff across four faculties. The Scholarly Publications team provides support for research activities including the institutional repository and research data management. ORCID was first promoted in 2013 and is now integrated into the postgraduate researcher workflow and upcoming staff publishing workflows. ORCID helps with accurate attribution of authors in research metrics reporting and identifying collaborations. Maintaining central support and emphasizing the benefits to individuals have helped adoption.
This document provides an overview of a workshop on publishing and getting research read. It discusses various topics related to the publication process, including why researchers publish, finding the best journal to submit to, open access publishing, how to interpret impact factors, writing manuscripts, publication ethics, and peer review. The document also includes an introduction to the workshop presenter, Max Haring, who is an executive editor at Springer and has a PhD in plant epigenetics.
Promoting High Quality Open Access Journals in African Higher EducationClara Armengou
The document discusses promoting high quality open access journals in African higher education. It outlines the benefits of open access in removing barriers and increasing global access to research. It describes the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and its role in listing peer-reviewed open access journals and promoting transparency. Stricter criteria were implemented in 2014 to ensure included journals meet standards around editorial processes, licensing, and best practices. The presentation encourages African journals to improve quality and transparency to be included in DOAJ and benefit from increased visibility and opportunities for funding and submissions.
This document provides guidance on writing for publication. It discusses planning research from the start by considering the hypothesis, design, methodology and more. Key sections of a research article are introduced, including the introduction, methods, results, discussion and more. Tips are provided for writing an effective title and abstract to grab readers' attention. Reporting standards and how to choose an appropriate journal are also covered. The document concludes with suggestions for getting the editors' and reviewers' attention such as writing a thoughtful cover letter and abstract that highlights the significance and novelty of the findings.
DORA and the reinvention of research assessmentMark Patterson
This document discusses problems with current research assessment approaches and recommendations from DORA to address them. It outlines eLife's motivations to serve science through a swift, fair review process and exploiting digital media. Current metrics like the Journal Impact Factor are journal-based, proprietary and incomplete. DORA recommends evaluating research based on its own merits using multiple indicators rather than journal names. Funders, institutions, publishers and metric providers are encouraged to consider article-level metrics and outcomes over journal reputation. Progress is being made as funders and institutions explore narrative assessments and considering a wider range of research outputs and impacts.
Adam Etkin's Flash Presentation from STM Spring 2014Adam Etkin
PRE-Score is a proposed product that aims to provide standardized metrics and filters to evaluate the peer review process of scholarly journals. It would assign a PRE-Score to journals based on factors like the rigor of the peer review process, qualifications of reviewers, and best practices followed. This score would provide readers a "leading indicator" of journal quality rather than lagging metrics. It is presented as addressing the lack of consistent ways to evaluate peer review across different journals and as an incentive for journals to improve their peer review practices.
This document summarizes a presentation about the COMREC processes and procedures for research approval at a medical college in Malawi. It outlines the functions of COMREC, which include protecting human and animal subjects in research and promoting ethical research. It describes the submission procedures, requiring proposals to be submitted by the 1st of each month with a processing fee. It also summarizes the review process, categories of review, exemption criteria, elements of review including ethics and methodology, and application materials required. The goal is to demystify the COMREC research approval processes and procedures for faculty and students conducting research.
A presentation from the joint CILIP Information Literacy Group and Library and Information Research Group's Writing Research Proposals and Publication event.
1. The document discusses preparing researchers for the next Research Excellence Framework (REF) assessment in the UK. It covers open access policies, bibliometrics, altmetrics, and ORCID identifiers.
2. Open access requirements for REF submissions are that journal articles and conference papers be made publicly available within 3 months of acceptance in an institutional repository.
3. Bibliometrics like citation counts and journal impact factors may play a larger role in REF assessments in the future, though peer review will still be primary. Concerns about gaming the system and disciplinary biases remain.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
2. Session outline
• Overview of the REF
• Systems used for the publications submission
• Library role
• Reflections
• Next REF
3. The assessment framework
Overall quality
Publications
Maximum of 4 per
researcher
Impact
Impact template and
case studies
Environment
Environment data and
template
65% 20% 15%
Overview:
4. Publications overview
• Assesses all types of research outputs in terms of their
‘originality, significance and rigour’
• Expert sub panels for each 36 (subject based) Units of
Assessment
• Publication period 1st Jan 2008 – 31st Dec 2013
• Citation data used in some panels to ‘inform the
assessment’
5. Assessment criteria
The criteria for assessing the quality of publications are
originality, significance and rigour*
Four star Quality that is world-leading in terms of originality, significance
and rigour
Three star
Quality that is internationally excellent in terms of originality,
significance and rigour but which falls short of the highest
standards of excellence
Two star Quality that is recognised internationally in terms of originality,
significance and rigour
One star Quality that is recognised nationally in terms of originality,
significance and rigour
Unclassified
Quality that falls below the standard of nationally recognised
work. Or work which does not meet the published definition of
research for the purposes of this assessment
* Each main panel provides descriptive account of the criteria
Outputs:
6. REF Systems
• Research Profile System – all elements of the REF
submission
• Research Profile Form – publications selected for
submission
• Eprints plugin on ORO (OU’s institutional repository)
• REF submission system
7. Library role
• Managing publications submission:
–Scoping and planning
–Technical phase
–Testing and evaluation
–Quality assurance
–Communication – within and outside the OU
–Validating citation data
–Scanning and print submission
15. Beyond REF2014
• Consultation in 2013
• HEFCE policy for journal articles and conference
proceedings published in March 2014
• For publications accepted after 1st April 2016:
– Open access - deposit of the ‘authors accepted
manuscript in a repository’
– Deposit of metadata completed no longer than 3
months after acceptance with an extra month to deposit
the full-text if there is no publisher embargo
16. Beyond REF2014 (continued)
• Full-text embargoes – panel A&B (Science, Technology,
Medicine) no longer than 12 months, C&D no longer 24
months, full-text must be available within one month after
the end of the embargo period
• Exceptions will be allowed
• Must enable machine readable discovery and access
• Data and text mining
• HEFCE are working with Jisc to support repositories in
implementing this policy
• HEFCE consultation out on the role of metrics in the next
REF