1
2
SITE EXECUTION
Mentor: Shrinivas Ubdi
Guide: Murtuza Zaranwala
Ramesh Patil
Vaibhav Jagdale
3
CONTENTS
QUALITY DEPARTMENT
SITE EXECUTION
LABOUR OUTPUT
MATERIAL CONSUMPTION
SUGGESTIONS
4
Quality Department
1. Quality assurance and quality control
2. Concrete mix design
3. Lab test
4. Cube test results
5. RMC plant
5
Quality Assurance And Quality Control
1. For quality assurance we have checklist, Quality plan in our QMS,
QMS works as a tool for our quality assurance.
2. For quality control we do conduct lab test and various materials gets tested there
at frequent intervals of time.
6
Concrete Mix Design
Concrete ingredients IS 10262 Cube casting
7
Lab Tests
Specific gravity Flow test Compressive strength test
8
Cube test result (M50)
Date Cube
no.
Size(cm3) Weight
(kg)
Breaking
load (KN)
Load
(Mpa)
Avg.
(Mpa)
1 15*15*15 8.40 706 31.37
7days 19/07/17 2 15*15*15 8.33 806.8 35.86 33.3(66.7)
3 15*15*15 8.31 735.2 32.68
4 15*15*15 8.25 1417 62.97
28
days
09/08/17 5 15*15*15 8.28 1356 60.27 61.76
(123%)
6 15*15*15 8.36 1396 62.04
9
RMC Plant
10
Site Execution
SHORE PILE
INSERT PLATE
COUPLER AND TERMINATOR
RCC Work ( Slab Cycle )
11
Slab Cycle
Structural line marking Material shifting Column tying
12
Coupling beam Column shuttering Beam bottom and deck panel
Slab Cycle
13
Bean & Slab tying Shuttering checking
Slab Cycle
14
Concreting by bucket Concreting by boom placer Floater
Slab Cycle
15
COUPLER AND TERMINATOR
16
Insert plate
Insert plate and stud Insert plate after installation
17
Gang form/ Slipform
Fixing of cone Fixing of shoe Retracting Gang form
Fixing of L-anchorLifting Fixing of Gang form
18
Shore Pile
Pile point by surveyor Pile hole drilling Liner installation
19
Level check Cage installation Tremie concreting
Shore Pile
20
Rock anchor drill Tendon installation and gp2 filling Post tensioning
Shore Pile
21
Geo textile Guniting
Shore Pile
22
LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY
ZONE 1
ZONE -2
LABOUR HR RCC QTY
PRODUCTIVITY(Kg/h
r/labour)
COLUMN 192 6210 32.34
BEAM 212 5700 26.89
SLAB 161 5776 35.88
SR NO. LABOUR HRS RCC QTY
PRODUCTIVITY(
Kg/hr/labour)
COLUMN 395.25 12885 32.6
BEAM 196 7313 37.31
SLAB 195.5 7238 37.02
23
LABOUR SAMPLING
42%
28%
30%
STEELTYING WORK
PRODUCTIVE
SEMI-PRODUCTIVE
NON-PRODUCTIVE
45%
25%
30%
COLUMNTYING
PRODUCTIVE
SEMI-PRODUCTIVE
NON-PRODUCTIVE
38%
30%
32%
BEAMTYING
PRODUCTIVE
SEMI-PRODUCTIVE
NON-PRODUCTIVE
42%
32%
26%
SLABTYING
PRODUCTIVE
SEMI-PRODUCTIVE
NON-PRODUCTIVE
24
MATERIAL CONSUMPTION RECONCILATION REPORT
CURING COMPOUND
SURFACE AREA COVERAGE FOR CURING
COMPOND(THEORETICAL)(SQM/LT)
7
SURFACE AREA COVERAGE FOR CURING
COMPOND(PRACTICAL)(SQM/LT)
12
WASTAGE(%) -71.4
25
GP2 CONSUMPTION RECONCILATION REPORT
SR ZONE ISSUED REQUIRED WASTAGE (%)
1 Z1 22 21.78671896 0.978949802
2 Z2 22 16.91540737 30.05894284
3 Z3 22 21.23769745 3.589384175
4 Z4 15 8.552080161 75.39592378
5 CORE 15 16.11557632 -6.922348305
OVERALL 96 84.60748026 13.46514481
26
SUGGESTIONS
1. Need to look upon curing compound application
(70% less application as compared to data given by manufacturer)
Poor workmanship issue.
2. Some kind of app (spread sheet or Google forms ) for better use of resources like crane,
(in which like everyone needed to use it has to quote date and time,
for which it is required, and in app showing is it available or not, & hence plan accordingly)
27

Site execution