Sustainable Development of SEZ’S Tanmay Tathagat & Sachin Rastogi Environmental Design Soultions Environmental Design Solutions
Integrated Design Approach 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions Sustainable  Development  Partners Building Owners Builders/Contractors Manufacturers Architects/Engineers Building Users
Integrated Design for Sustainability 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
Energy Performance Targets for Buildings: Optimised orientation Micro-climate control to avoid heat Island Daylighting (>90% Daylit spaces) 100% shaded Glazing during summer (April-October) Natural ventilation Potential in transition spaces  Minimal Heat Gain through building envelope (50% better than ASHRAE 90.1 2007 an ECBC envelope standards) 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
Performance Targets for Buildings: Compliance check with ECBC for the following:  Envelope Lighting HVAC  systems District heating and Cooling system Energy Efficient External and Internal lighting 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions 1.  Illuminance Levels  As per NBC 350 Lux average Lighting Load (<0.7 W/sft for offices) Suspended direct indirect light fittings Desk and furniture mounted task light
15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions Performance Targets for Buildings: Comfort Conditions 27C cooling set point (Japan has mandated this) Integrating Ceiling Fans with HVAC for improved comfort  HVAC Load 400+ sft/TR HVAC equipment efficiencies to exceed the ASHRAE 90.1 2007 Standards Equipment Use and Electrical Load Reduce energy use for computers Flywheel based UPS Overall energy use can be as little as than 90 kWh/m2/year
Renewable Energy 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions Carbon Neutral  (through on site + off site energy) Zero Net Energy for Lighting (through On-Site generation) PV systems integrated in design Micro/ Macro Wind turbines Biogas/Biomass (Kitchen waste + STP output + landscape Waste) Positive Life Cycle cost of all investments Energy Systems (Except renewable to have a payback of less than 5 years
Water Water use reduction –Efficient and low flow  water fixtures 100% rooftop Rainwater Storage & Recycling Surface rainwater to be filtered and sent to aquifer  100% STP water to reused on site 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
Waste Minimise waste production by awareness  programmes Dedicated, easily accessible and adequate  communal waste storage areas  Zero Waste During Construction Post construction, Construction waste management plan to be implemented Waste collection and segregation at source Treatment of Organic waste on-site Rest including e-waste to be sent for off-site recycling  15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
Transportation Pedestrian friendly and walkable development Efficient and easy accessible public transportation Low/Zero e-vehicles for private car pools and public transportation on site Alternative fuel station within the development Mass transit for 90% of the occupants Community and Public utility services provided onsite 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
Ecology Water efficient landscaping Conservation of existing natural landscape Conservation of existing natural aquifers Re-charge ground water table 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
Social–Economic  Promote work and living culture within the same site Community outreach and involvement Local food production 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
Energy Efficiency Impact 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions Renewable Energy onsite ~ 1.2 MW This will reduce the grid energy use of the project further by 6-8% Resulting in total energy savings of 45-47% over the ASHRAE 90.1 2007 baseline Server room energy use is also optimized to match the overall building savings level Total energy savings ~ 8 million kWh/year  ~ 7000 Tons of CO2 emission avoided directly CASE STUDY 1: GREEN SPACES SUSTANABLE DESIGN     Lights Equip. Heating Cooling Total ASHRAE 90.1 2007 baseline  7,882,734  3,743,084  3,703  9,185,278  20,814,800  Proposed Case 4,437,731  3,743,084  0  4,569,703  12,750,518  % Savings 44% 0% 100% 50% 39%
15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions CASE STUDY 2: MAYTAS HILL COUNTY Electrical End-use Totals (kWh) The Proposed case building incorporating various energy efficiency measures shows 55.8 % energy savings per year or 22,696,140 KWh per year over the Typical building.  Table : Electrical Use Summary-Typical Case and Proposed Case buildings Alternative Lights Equip. Heating Cooling Tower Pumps Fans Ext. Lights Ext. Equip. Total % savings over Typical Bldg Typical Bldg 7,295,505 5,531,316 581,694 8,734,920 2,964,039 525,416 12,417,600 21,076 2,595,888 40,667,460   Optimized Bldg 4,615,356 5,531,316 32,422 2,834,260 1,094,936 365,516 880,552 21,076 2,595,888 17,971,320 55.8%
15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions The proposed case showed an energy saving of  22.34  % over the ASHRAE Budget building  The proposed building is able to achieve  39.39%  gas savings over the ASHRAE Budget building. CASE STUDY 3: METROVALLEY S. No. Energy Conservation Measure  Lighting Equipment Cooling Tower Secondary Pumps Fans Total Energy Use (kWh/Yr) Saving over typical base  building 1 Typical Base Case 4,755,598 7,133,508 7,264,992 4,168,708 15,192 1,059,655 24,397,650 2 Proposed Case 3,804,644 7,133,508 4,830,557 2,216,965 7,067 952,824 18,945,560 22.34% Alternative Heating Hot Water Total Ashrae Base Case - Natural Gas (Therm) 62,986 432 63,418 Proposed case - Natural Gas (Therm) 38,003 432 38,435 Savings Over Base Case     39.30%
Thanks www.edsglobal.com 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions

Sez presentation-6

  • 1.
    Sustainable Development ofSEZ’S Tanmay Tathagat & Sachin Rastogi Environmental Design Soultions Environmental Design Solutions
  • 2.
    Integrated Design Approach15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions Sustainable Development Partners Building Owners Builders/Contractors Manufacturers Architects/Engineers Building Users
  • 3.
    Integrated Design forSustainability 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
  • 4.
    Energy Performance Targetsfor Buildings: Optimised orientation Micro-climate control to avoid heat Island Daylighting (>90% Daylit spaces) 100% shaded Glazing during summer (April-October) Natural ventilation Potential in transition spaces Minimal Heat Gain through building envelope (50% better than ASHRAE 90.1 2007 an ECBC envelope standards) 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
  • 5.
    Performance Targets forBuildings: Compliance check with ECBC for the following: Envelope Lighting HVAC systems District heating and Cooling system Energy Efficient External and Internal lighting 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions 1. Illuminance Levels As per NBC 350 Lux average Lighting Load (<0.7 W/sft for offices) Suspended direct indirect light fittings Desk and furniture mounted task light
  • 6.
    15 June 09Environmental Design Solutions Performance Targets for Buildings: Comfort Conditions 27C cooling set point (Japan has mandated this) Integrating Ceiling Fans with HVAC for improved comfort HVAC Load 400+ sft/TR HVAC equipment efficiencies to exceed the ASHRAE 90.1 2007 Standards Equipment Use and Electrical Load Reduce energy use for computers Flywheel based UPS Overall energy use can be as little as than 90 kWh/m2/year
  • 7.
    Renewable Energy 15June 09 Environmental Design Solutions Carbon Neutral (through on site + off site energy) Zero Net Energy for Lighting (through On-Site generation) PV systems integrated in design Micro/ Macro Wind turbines Biogas/Biomass (Kitchen waste + STP output + landscape Waste) Positive Life Cycle cost of all investments Energy Systems (Except renewable to have a payback of less than 5 years
  • 8.
    Water Water usereduction –Efficient and low flow water fixtures 100% rooftop Rainwater Storage & Recycling Surface rainwater to be filtered and sent to aquifer 100% STP water to reused on site 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
  • 9.
    Waste Minimise wasteproduction by awareness programmes Dedicated, easily accessible and adequate communal waste storage areas Zero Waste During Construction Post construction, Construction waste management plan to be implemented Waste collection and segregation at source Treatment of Organic waste on-site Rest including e-waste to be sent for off-site recycling 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
  • 10.
    Transportation Pedestrian friendlyand walkable development Efficient and easy accessible public transportation Low/Zero e-vehicles for private car pools and public transportation on site Alternative fuel station within the development Mass transit for 90% of the occupants Community and Public utility services provided onsite 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
  • 11.
    Ecology Water efficientlandscaping Conservation of existing natural landscape Conservation of existing natural aquifers Re-charge ground water table 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
  • 12.
    Social–Economic Promotework and living culture within the same site Community outreach and involvement Local food production 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions
  • 13.
    Energy Efficiency Impact15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions Renewable Energy onsite ~ 1.2 MW This will reduce the grid energy use of the project further by 6-8% Resulting in total energy savings of 45-47% over the ASHRAE 90.1 2007 baseline Server room energy use is also optimized to match the overall building savings level Total energy savings ~ 8 million kWh/year ~ 7000 Tons of CO2 emission avoided directly CASE STUDY 1: GREEN SPACES SUSTANABLE DESIGN   Lights Equip. Heating Cooling Total ASHRAE 90.1 2007 baseline 7,882,734 3,743,084 3,703 9,185,278 20,814,800 Proposed Case 4,437,731 3,743,084 0 4,569,703 12,750,518 % Savings 44% 0% 100% 50% 39%
  • 14.
    15 June 09Environmental Design Solutions CASE STUDY 2: MAYTAS HILL COUNTY Electrical End-use Totals (kWh) The Proposed case building incorporating various energy efficiency measures shows 55.8 % energy savings per year or 22,696,140 KWh per year over the Typical building. Table : Electrical Use Summary-Typical Case and Proposed Case buildings Alternative Lights Equip. Heating Cooling Tower Pumps Fans Ext. Lights Ext. Equip. Total % savings over Typical Bldg Typical Bldg 7,295,505 5,531,316 581,694 8,734,920 2,964,039 525,416 12,417,600 21,076 2,595,888 40,667,460   Optimized Bldg 4,615,356 5,531,316 32,422 2,834,260 1,094,936 365,516 880,552 21,076 2,595,888 17,971,320 55.8%
  • 15.
    15 June 09Environmental Design Solutions The proposed case showed an energy saving of 22.34 % over the ASHRAE Budget building The proposed building is able to achieve 39.39% gas savings over the ASHRAE Budget building. CASE STUDY 3: METROVALLEY S. No. Energy Conservation Measure Lighting Equipment Cooling Tower Secondary Pumps Fans Total Energy Use (kWh/Yr) Saving over typical base building 1 Typical Base Case 4,755,598 7,133,508 7,264,992 4,168,708 15,192 1,059,655 24,397,650 2 Proposed Case 3,804,644 7,133,508 4,830,557 2,216,965 7,067 952,824 18,945,560 22.34% Alternative Heating Hot Water Total Ashrae Base Case - Natural Gas (Therm) 62,986 432 63,418 Proposed case - Natural Gas (Therm) 38,003 432 38,435 Savings Over Base Case     39.30%
  • 16.
    Thanks www.edsglobal.com 15June 09 Environmental Design Solutions