Rosengren fuzzy thinking or fuzzy logic
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•799 views
The document discusses the differences and relationships between motivational interviewing (MI) and client-centered therapy. It explores how definitions of MI have evolved over time from a set of concepts and precepts to a more directive method for enhancing motivation. The document also examines debates around key terms like "equipoise" and whether a binary or fuzzy logic is more appropriate for understanding MI. Clarifying definitions is important for research on evidence-based practices and ensuring interventions are implemented with fidelity.
![How did we get here? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (15)
Similar to Rosengren fuzzy thinking or fuzzy logic
Similar to Rosengren fuzzy thinking or fuzzy logic (7)
More from Magnus Johansson
More from Magnus Johansson (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Rosengren fuzzy thinking or fuzzy logic
- 1. Splitting hairs or parsing concepts, fuzzy thinking or fuzzy categories: where does MI end and client-centered therapy begin? David B. Rosengren, Ph.D. Director, Research & Evaluation Services Prevention Research institute ICMI – 2 Stockholm, SE June 7, 2010
- 3. Where do the tent pegs go?
- 6. And then there was equipoise…
- 8. So, equipoise… about what?
- 9. Fuzzy thinking or Fuzzy categories?