Richard Dyer suggests that there are two paradoxes of stars. First, that a star is both ordinary and extraordinary - they need to seem like regular people but also possess a special quality that makes them stand out. Second, that a star is both present and absent - they are part of our lives through their influence on our conversations, styles, and consumption, but are ultimately out of reach physically. The lesson objective is to complete star image work by embedding relevant theory and references to existing artists that exemplify these paradoxes.

1. Richard Dyer : Paradox of the Star
Lesson objective
To complete star image work, embedding relevant
theory with references.
Starter
A star is both ordinary and extraordinary.
A star is both present and absent.
On white boards, break down what these statements mean. Can
you link these to any existing artists who you feel it may apply to?

2. ‘Paradox of the Stars’ (1979)
• Dyer suggests that there are two paradoxes (things that
contradict themselves). He suggested that there are two
contrary representations when it comes to stars.
– “…a star is both ordinary and extraordinary.”
– “…a star is both present and absent.”
Dyer, R (1979). Stars. London: BFI Publishing

3. “…a star is both
ordinary and
extraordinary.”
The star needs to be like
us (the audience and
regular people) and yet
possess something we do
not have which makes
them special.

4. "...a star is both
present and absent."
They exist and are part of
our lives in the fact that
we discuss them socially,
may adopt our style from
them, construct our
identity and they may
dictate some of our
consumer habits.
But they are also absent;
out of reach and not
actually there.