History & Origin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 
Early Evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 
Global Expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 
Modern Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 
Company Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 
Recent Efforts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 
Company DNA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 
Social Media Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . 23 
2
 Jeremiah Colman, a miller by training, who man-aged a mill in Norfolk, 
England before buying his own mill in 1803 
 In 1814, he bought a mustard business and added the crushing of 
mustard seeds to that of wheat kernels 
 By 1829, he had extended his reach to London 
 By 1854, three years after Jeremiah’s death, Colman’s had 
constructed Britain’s first mill dedicated entirely to mustard. 
 Jeremiah’s nephew James (Jeremiah being childless) had taken over 
the firm 
 Having been co-opted as a partner in 1823 and, clearly sharing his 
uncle’s partiality for asset-driven expansion into new categories, he 
took the firm into the manufacture of starch, laundry blue and corn 
flour, all leveraging the company’s investment and expertise in milling. 
3
 Entry into the starch category brought Colman’s into competition with 
another trained miller, Isaac Reckitt 
 Isaac Reckitt’s mill, after twenty years of unsuccessfully running a series 
of flour milling businesses and losing all his capital, borrowed enough 
from his obviously loving relatives to rent a starch works in the north of 
England 
 There he yet again failed to make his mark, until his four sons, 
including a chemist and a salesman, took over the key roles 
 For the first seven years, the business lost money and it was only when 
the product range was extended beyond starch that the business 
became viable 
 It took the business a full eighteen years to pay back Isaac’s relatives, 
whom he only outlived by four years. 
4
 The third 19th-century industrialist involved in the genesis of Reckitt 
Benckiser was Johann Adam Benckiser, who founded an industrial 
chemicals manufacturing business in Pforzheim, Germany in 1823 
 In 1851, Johann co-founded a chemical plant with chemist Ludwig 
Reimann 
 Seven years later relocating the business to Ludwigshafen, where it 
also began the production of phosphates, citric acid and other 
commodity chemicals. 
 This unlikely trio of mustard cook, household products manufacturer 
and chemical industrialist would bring something different to the 
Reckitt Benckiser party 
5
6 
 The mustard maker’s great nephew would be one of 19th-century 
Britain’s most innovative advertisers, building leading-edge 
marketing skills in selling a product half of which was scraped off 
plates uneaten at the end of meals. 
 The household products maker’s sons recognised that a huge 
business could be built on the insight of making the homemaker’s 
life easier, and embarked on a late-19th-century acquisition spree 
of all kinds of household goods brands while internationalising the 
business as early as 1864 
 The German industrialist’s descendants, who would spend well 
over a century in the commodity chemicals sector, were 
exceptionally astute business strategists who knew how to 
revolutionize a business
 The two firms finally buried the hatchet in 1913 when they formed a 
joint company 
 The two companies combined all their overseas businesses in order to 
generate the critical mass to run manufacturing operations in 
Australia, Canada and South Africa 
 Dettol had begun as a project in 1929, to develop an antiseptic 
disinfectant that could be safely applied to open cuts and wounds 
 The deal catapulted Reckitt & Colman into the top four globally, but 
to fund it the company had to sell off the bulk of the food side of the 
business 
 The iconic Colman’s mustard brand itself, sold to Unilever in 1995 for 
£250 million 
 The Benckiser was now a relative minnow with annual sales of only 
$250 million 
7
 Benckiser continued to acquire strong local brands, such as Italy’s 
Mira Lanza and Panigel together with Spain’s leading detergent 
company, S.A. Camp Group 
 Benckiser competed with the multinational giants such as Unilever 
and P&G 
 The company significantly increased its US presence with the 
acquisition of SmithKline Beecham’s North American household 
products division for $106 million in 1990 
 The company buy the Margaret Astor and Lancaster cosmetics 
business from Smithkline 
 The Benckiser set about expanding its new cosmetics arm picking up 
Jovan, Germaine Monteil, Bogner Cosmetics and Joop! Perfumes 
8
9 
 Benckiser became US market leader in mass-market cosmetics with 
the $400 million purchase from Pfizer of the Coty business 
 Exclamation, Lady Stetson, L’Effleur, Sand & Sable and Wild Musk; this 
pushed the share of total company sales of $3.4 billion coming from 
cosmetics and fragrances 
 The Benckiser now has over $3 billion annual sales 
 Benckiser organized all its businesses into one single holding company 
called Coty Inc.
 Reckitt was selling its products in some 180 countries and had 
operation in 60 countries 
 In 2003 sales were split by region 
 Western Europe – 47% 
 North America – 27% 
 Asia-Pacific – 12 % 
 Latin America – 4% 
 Rest of world – 10% 
10
 On the 27th July 1999 the merger of Reckitt & Colman and Benckiser 
created a business with sales of more than £3 billion 
 The world’s fourth-biggest manufacturer of household cleaning and 
personal care products 
 Reckitt Benckiser had three overriding priorities: To focus the brand 
portfolio and to reduce costs 
 Deploying the Benckiser strategy and operating style on the Reckitt & 
Colman brand portfolio 
 The remit of Squeeze was to look at the detailed design of products 
and find ways to squeeze out costs without adversely affecting the 
utility or efficacy 
 The X-trim team focused on saving costs elsewhere in the business 
 A disproportionate focus on brands that were either number one or 
two in categories with above-average growth prospects 
11
 Grow categories and brand share via an unrelenting program of 
incremental improvement innovations, executed with great speed, 
and above-average marketing spends 
 Focus was mainly on organic growth 
 Acquisitions, as had been the case soon after the merger, would only 
be considered if targets had a great strategic fit 
12
 Reckitt Benckiser began life in 1999 with a regional management 
structure in which country managers reported into regions or sub-regions 
 In 2003, the company got a handle on the different issues in the 
different markets, it moved to a hybrid regional/market development 
structure 
13
14 
2004 
 Reckitt Benckiser celebrated five years of unbroken success since its 
formation with 10% growth in the year at constant exchange rates 
 The growth was fairly evenly spread around the world with Europe 
growing by 8%, North America & Australia by 9% and Developing 
Markets by 16% 
 Operating margins expanded a full 1.3 percentage points up to 19.6% 
 The company having almost tripled its annual operating profit since 
1999 
 The increase in margins came from increases in gross margin, up from 
an industry-trailing 46.4% in 1999 to an industry-leading 54.8%
2005 
 Reckitt Benckiser’s sales grew by 8% but only by 6% at constant 
exchange rates 
 New to the elite club was Bang, sold under the Cillit brand in Europe 
and Easy Off in the rest of the world. 
 Reckitt Benckiser had been looking for a major acquisition within OTC 
healthcare, which conformed to the specification for outstanding 
long-term growth prospects in an ageing populations 
 The largest acquisition in the company is that of Boots Healthcare 
International for £1.9B 
2006 
 In eleven months of BHI sales in 2006 Overall revenues grew by 18% to 
a shade under £5 billion 
15
 Reckitt Benckiser owned and had the US distribution rights for, and its 
related drug Subutex, which grew by 30% in to £165 
 The European bias of BHI further increased the area percentage of 
Reckitt Benckiser sales up to 53% 
2007 
 Seven percent increase in reported revenues whilst 10% on a like-for-like 
basis gave the eighth consecutive year of above-average 
industry growth 
 The product sales grew by 10% in the first full year of Reckitt Benckiser 
ownership 
 The excellent start in a year when all but one of the eighteen Power 
brands gained market share 
 The new improved Reckitt Benckiser now had 75% of its revenues from 
brands that were number one or two in their markets 
16
17 
 The company was now worldwide number one or two in several 
categories 
 Reckitt Benckiser had substantially increased its sales infrastructure 
and received an immediate payback sales rising by 42%, delivering a 
staggering 56% margin the area average for all other products was 
just 21% 
2008 
 The Adams acquisition not only added to the top line but grew by 12% 
in the eleven months 
 The company posted a 25% increase in sales to £6.5 billion, its core 
business having grown by 13% and its power brands by 17% 
 The company yet again increased its gross margin by a full 
percentage point to 59.3%
 This increase is driven by better-than-average performances by the 
higher-margin categories, continued ‘Squeeze’ cost savings. 
 The continued explosive growth of the now renamed 
Pharmaceuticals Unit, whose sales increased another 45% up to £341 
million, delivering an eye-watering £193 million operating profit which 
added nearly two whole percentage points to the entire company’s 
operating profit margin 
2009 
 With over 80% of sales coming from developed markets, the company 
was more vulnerable than many to the slowdown 
 The company grew by an impressive 18%, 8% at constant exchange 
rates, to reach £7.8 billion – a top-class performance in the economic 
circumstances 
18
19 
 The company had deliberately added some areas of the portfolio in 
recent years specifically to protect against economic downturn as 
well as to make money in healthier times 
 Savings had pushed the gross margin over 60% for the first time in the 
company’s 10-year history, an increase of almost fifteen percentage 
points over the period 
2010 
 Another 9% on the top line took sales to nearly £8.5 billion, like-for-like 
growth of 6% and still a respectable 5%, excluding pharmaceuticals 
 Once again, Health & Personal Care performed strongly, helped by a 
good piece of cross-category innovation with the Surface Care 
brands Dettol and Lysol each launching the No-Touch Hand Soap 
System 
 Coming a year after the H1N1 scare Home Care increased by 8%
20 
 RB Pharmaceuticals sale rise to £737 million 
 The RB Pharmaceuticals sales had also been boosted by the 
company’s £100 million re-purchase of the European distribution rights 
 Reckitt Benckiser was now most definitely in pharmaceuticals; business 
the unit contributed 9% of the year’s total sales 
 The addition of SSL would increase the size of the Health & Personal 
Care category by 36% and add two new brands to the power brand 
list 
2011 
 The Reckitt Benckiser’s M&A strategy had got the company into 
higher-margin categories 
 Reckitt Benckiser had been far more focused on taking more power 
brands into existing markets than in opening up new markets for all 
the company’s brands
21 
2012 
 The machine they’re using had adjusted well to its new settings. 
 Top-line sales were up by barely 1% to £9.6 billion – all coming from RB 
Pharmaceuticals – this masked a more robust like-for-like increase of 
4% when exchange rates were factored out 
 Health grew by 6%, helped by the Durex brand increasing its reach in 
China, a growth rate matched by Hygiene in which Dettol Daily Care, 
Lysol No-Touch Kitchen System and the Quantum brand all made 
significant gains 
 RB Pharmaceuticals put on an additional 10% revenue with strong 
volume growth in the key US market, tempered by the switch from 
Suboxone tablets to lower-margin film 
 RUMEA was up by 8% primarily because of Russia and the rest of the 
CIS
 Reckitt Benckiser had been the most consistently managed of all 
the world’s major packaged goods companies 
 Reckitt Benckiser strategy is to focus on the brands that were 
advantaged in both profitability and growth prospects 
 The key elements of the company’s DNA are Consumer Focus, 
Speed and Creative Tension 
22
 Reckitt Benckiser has been one of the biggest consumer goods 
success stories of the early 21st century 
 During their first twelve years its share price increased five times more 
than Unilever’s 
 The company has been the subject of countless case studies in its 
approach to innovation, not surprising, as it has set new benchmarks 
for the level of innovation sustainable by a large packaged goods 
company 
23
Website: www.rb.com/home 
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/reckitt-benckiser 
Facebook: www.facebook.com/ReckittBenckiser. 
Twitter: www.twitter.com/discoverRB 
Youtube: www.youtube.com/user/RBworldwide 
24
Reckitt Benckiser - History, Evolution, Present and the Future

Reckitt Benckiser - History, Evolution, Present and the Future

  • 2.
    History & Origin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Early Evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Global Expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Modern Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Company Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Recent Efforts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Company DNA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Social Media Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2
  • 3.
     Jeremiah Colman,a miller by training, who man-aged a mill in Norfolk, England before buying his own mill in 1803  In 1814, he bought a mustard business and added the crushing of mustard seeds to that of wheat kernels  By 1829, he had extended his reach to London  By 1854, three years after Jeremiah’s death, Colman’s had constructed Britain’s first mill dedicated entirely to mustard.  Jeremiah’s nephew James (Jeremiah being childless) had taken over the firm  Having been co-opted as a partner in 1823 and, clearly sharing his uncle’s partiality for asset-driven expansion into new categories, he took the firm into the manufacture of starch, laundry blue and corn flour, all leveraging the company’s investment and expertise in milling. 3
  • 4.
     Entry intothe starch category brought Colman’s into competition with another trained miller, Isaac Reckitt  Isaac Reckitt’s mill, after twenty years of unsuccessfully running a series of flour milling businesses and losing all his capital, borrowed enough from his obviously loving relatives to rent a starch works in the north of England  There he yet again failed to make his mark, until his four sons, including a chemist and a salesman, took over the key roles  For the first seven years, the business lost money and it was only when the product range was extended beyond starch that the business became viable  It took the business a full eighteen years to pay back Isaac’s relatives, whom he only outlived by four years. 4
  • 5.
     The third19th-century industrialist involved in the genesis of Reckitt Benckiser was Johann Adam Benckiser, who founded an industrial chemicals manufacturing business in Pforzheim, Germany in 1823  In 1851, Johann co-founded a chemical plant with chemist Ludwig Reimann  Seven years later relocating the business to Ludwigshafen, where it also began the production of phosphates, citric acid and other commodity chemicals.  This unlikely trio of mustard cook, household products manufacturer and chemical industrialist would bring something different to the Reckitt Benckiser party 5
  • 6.
    6  Themustard maker’s great nephew would be one of 19th-century Britain’s most innovative advertisers, building leading-edge marketing skills in selling a product half of which was scraped off plates uneaten at the end of meals.  The household products maker’s sons recognised that a huge business could be built on the insight of making the homemaker’s life easier, and embarked on a late-19th-century acquisition spree of all kinds of household goods brands while internationalising the business as early as 1864  The German industrialist’s descendants, who would spend well over a century in the commodity chemicals sector, were exceptionally astute business strategists who knew how to revolutionize a business
  • 7.
     The twofirms finally buried the hatchet in 1913 when they formed a joint company  The two companies combined all their overseas businesses in order to generate the critical mass to run manufacturing operations in Australia, Canada and South Africa  Dettol had begun as a project in 1929, to develop an antiseptic disinfectant that could be safely applied to open cuts and wounds  The deal catapulted Reckitt & Colman into the top four globally, but to fund it the company had to sell off the bulk of the food side of the business  The iconic Colman’s mustard brand itself, sold to Unilever in 1995 for £250 million  The Benckiser was now a relative minnow with annual sales of only $250 million 7
  • 8.
     Benckiser continuedto acquire strong local brands, such as Italy’s Mira Lanza and Panigel together with Spain’s leading detergent company, S.A. Camp Group  Benckiser competed with the multinational giants such as Unilever and P&G  The company significantly increased its US presence with the acquisition of SmithKline Beecham’s North American household products division for $106 million in 1990  The company buy the Margaret Astor and Lancaster cosmetics business from Smithkline  The Benckiser set about expanding its new cosmetics arm picking up Jovan, Germaine Monteil, Bogner Cosmetics and Joop! Perfumes 8
  • 9.
    9  Benckiserbecame US market leader in mass-market cosmetics with the $400 million purchase from Pfizer of the Coty business  Exclamation, Lady Stetson, L’Effleur, Sand & Sable and Wild Musk; this pushed the share of total company sales of $3.4 billion coming from cosmetics and fragrances  The Benckiser now has over $3 billion annual sales  Benckiser organized all its businesses into one single holding company called Coty Inc.
  • 10.
     Reckitt wasselling its products in some 180 countries and had operation in 60 countries  In 2003 sales were split by region  Western Europe – 47%  North America – 27%  Asia-Pacific – 12 %  Latin America – 4%  Rest of world – 10% 10
  • 11.
     On the27th July 1999 the merger of Reckitt & Colman and Benckiser created a business with sales of more than £3 billion  The world’s fourth-biggest manufacturer of household cleaning and personal care products  Reckitt Benckiser had three overriding priorities: To focus the brand portfolio and to reduce costs  Deploying the Benckiser strategy and operating style on the Reckitt & Colman brand portfolio  The remit of Squeeze was to look at the detailed design of products and find ways to squeeze out costs without adversely affecting the utility or efficacy  The X-trim team focused on saving costs elsewhere in the business  A disproportionate focus on brands that were either number one or two in categories with above-average growth prospects 11
  • 12.
     Grow categoriesand brand share via an unrelenting program of incremental improvement innovations, executed with great speed, and above-average marketing spends  Focus was mainly on organic growth  Acquisitions, as had been the case soon after the merger, would only be considered if targets had a great strategic fit 12
  • 13.
     Reckitt Benckiserbegan life in 1999 with a regional management structure in which country managers reported into regions or sub-regions  In 2003, the company got a handle on the different issues in the different markets, it moved to a hybrid regional/market development structure 13
  • 14.
    14 2004 Reckitt Benckiser celebrated five years of unbroken success since its formation with 10% growth in the year at constant exchange rates  The growth was fairly evenly spread around the world with Europe growing by 8%, North America & Australia by 9% and Developing Markets by 16%  Operating margins expanded a full 1.3 percentage points up to 19.6%  The company having almost tripled its annual operating profit since 1999  The increase in margins came from increases in gross margin, up from an industry-trailing 46.4% in 1999 to an industry-leading 54.8%
  • 15.
    2005  ReckittBenckiser’s sales grew by 8% but only by 6% at constant exchange rates  New to the elite club was Bang, sold under the Cillit brand in Europe and Easy Off in the rest of the world.  Reckitt Benckiser had been looking for a major acquisition within OTC healthcare, which conformed to the specification for outstanding long-term growth prospects in an ageing populations  The largest acquisition in the company is that of Boots Healthcare International for £1.9B 2006  In eleven months of BHI sales in 2006 Overall revenues grew by 18% to a shade under £5 billion 15
  • 16.
     Reckitt Benckiserowned and had the US distribution rights for, and its related drug Subutex, which grew by 30% in to £165  The European bias of BHI further increased the area percentage of Reckitt Benckiser sales up to 53% 2007  Seven percent increase in reported revenues whilst 10% on a like-for-like basis gave the eighth consecutive year of above-average industry growth  The product sales grew by 10% in the first full year of Reckitt Benckiser ownership  The excellent start in a year when all but one of the eighteen Power brands gained market share  The new improved Reckitt Benckiser now had 75% of its revenues from brands that were number one or two in their markets 16
  • 17.
    17  Thecompany was now worldwide number one or two in several categories  Reckitt Benckiser had substantially increased its sales infrastructure and received an immediate payback sales rising by 42%, delivering a staggering 56% margin the area average for all other products was just 21% 2008  The Adams acquisition not only added to the top line but grew by 12% in the eleven months  The company posted a 25% increase in sales to £6.5 billion, its core business having grown by 13% and its power brands by 17%  The company yet again increased its gross margin by a full percentage point to 59.3%
  • 18.
     This increaseis driven by better-than-average performances by the higher-margin categories, continued ‘Squeeze’ cost savings.  The continued explosive growth of the now renamed Pharmaceuticals Unit, whose sales increased another 45% up to £341 million, delivering an eye-watering £193 million operating profit which added nearly two whole percentage points to the entire company’s operating profit margin 2009  With over 80% of sales coming from developed markets, the company was more vulnerable than many to the slowdown  The company grew by an impressive 18%, 8% at constant exchange rates, to reach £7.8 billion – a top-class performance in the economic circumstances 18
  • 19.
    19  Thecompany had deliberately added some areas of the portfolio in recent years specifically to protect against economic downturn as well as to make money in healthier times  Savings had pushed the gross margin over 60% for the first time in the company’s 10-year history, an increase of almost fifteen percentage points over the period 2010  Another 9% on the top line took sales to nearly £8.5 billion, like-for-like growth of 6% and still a respectable 5%, excluding pharmaceuticals  Once again, Health & Personal Care performed strongly, helped by a good piece of cross-category innovation with the Surface Care brands Dettol and Lysol each launching the No-Touch Hand Soap System  Coming a year after the H1N1 scare Home Care increased by 8%
  • 20.
    20  RBPharmaceuticals sale rise to £737 million  The RB Pharmaceuticals sales had also been boosted by the company’s £100 million re-purchase of the European distribution rights  Reckitt Benckiser was now most definitely in pharmaceuticals; business the unit contributed 9% of the year’s total sales  The addition of SSL would increase the size of the Health & Personal Care category by 36% and add two new brands to the power brand list 2011  The Reckitt Benckiser’s M&A strategy had got the company into higher-margin categories  Reckitt Benckiser had been far more focused on taking more power brands into existing markets than in opening up new markets for all the company’s brands
  • 21.
    21 2012 The machine they’re using had adjusted well to its new settings.  Top-line sales were up by barely 1% to £9.6 billion – all coming from RB Pharmaceuticals – this masked a more robust like-for-like increase of 4% when exchange rates were factored out  Health grew by 6%, helped by the Durex brand increasing its reach in China, a growth rate matched by Hygiene in which Dettol Daily Care, Lysol No-Touch Kitchen System and the Quantum brand all made significant gains  RB Pharmaceuticals put on an additional 10% revenue with strong volume growth in the key US market, tempered by the switch from Suboxone tablets to lower-margin film  RUMEA was up by 8% primarily because of Russia and the rest of the CIS
  • 22.
     Reckitt Benckiserhad been the most consistently managed of all the world’s major packaged goods companies  Reckitt Benckiser strategy is to focus on the brands that were advantaged in both profitability and growth prospects  The key elements of the company’s DNA are Consumer Focus, Speed and Creative Tension 22
  • 23.
     Reckitt Benckiserhas been one of the biggest consumer goods success stories of the early 21st century  During their first twelve years its share price increased five times more than Unilever’s  The company has been the subject of countless case studies in its approach to innovation, not surprising, as it has set new benchmarks for the level of innovation sustainable by a large packaged goods company 23
  • 24.
    Website: www.rb.com/home LinkedIn:www.linkedin.com/company/reckitt-benckiser Facebook: www.facebook.com/ReckittBenckiser. Twitter: www.twitter.com/discoverRB Youtube: www.youtube.com/user/RBworldwide 24