The document discusses factors that affect recovery after natural disasters, using examples from Aceh, Indonesia after the 2004 tsunami. It finds that: 1) Massive aid can help rebuild physical capital like housing quickly but also introduces outside influences that change village life. 2) Aid was largely uncoordinated, with many NGOs competing and little oversight, affecting recovery trajectories across villages. 3) The type of aid agency, whether it was also the donor or just an implementer, affected the quality and sustainability of rebuilding efforts and level of community participation. 4) Introducing elections for village heads after the disaster shifted power from elites and was correlated with less community volunteerism in rebuilding