The document provides feedback on a thriller screening. It received positive feedback on the location, title sequence, transitions between scenes, progression of the story, variety of camera shots, and ending sequence. The title sequence and progression of the story were particularly praised. Some areas for potential improvement were also identified but not described.

2. When the thriller screenings took place, we got some
feedback on what people thought about it. The
feedback we received were good things, bad things and
what we could improve if we had to go back and do it
again. The good things that were said about our thriller
opening sequence were that the location we had was
good, it matched the task and built up what we needed
in order to have a good opening sequence.

3. The part that seemed to go down well with the
audience was our title sequence. The feedback we
received was that the way the title took place was
really good and looked professional. They liked the
way the letters faded out one by one as it linked to the
title of the thriller 'abandoned'. The transitions
received good feedback; the audience said that most
of the transitions looked good and matched well with
scenes.

4. We were also told that the way the story build up
was good. The audience liked how the story moved
on and developed throughout. The audience are
always wondering what is going to happen next.
Another good piece of feedback we received was
that we had a variety of camera shots and sizes in
the opening sequence which build up the story,
mysteriousness and tension. The different shots and
sizes meant we had used a variety.

5. The last piece of good feedback we received was
that the ending of the opening sequence was
good. The audience liked how it went from the
title sequence to the swaying door at the end as it
gave off 'creepiness'.