The keynote discusses the integration of mobile devices in education, focusing on context-based learning and its impact on student engagement. It highlights the benefits of mobile learning, such as enhancing active learning and facilitating situated learning experiences, backed by positive feedback from student trials. The future of mobile technology in education is deemed promising, with predictions of increased adoption and advancements in educational content development.

1. Putting Learning into Context with Mobile Devices Keynote at ‘Mobile Learning – Now and the Future’ 28th September 2011College of North West London John Cook (with help of Carl Smith & Claire Bradley)Learning Technology Research InstituteLondon Metropolitan University

2. Johnnigelcookor Jonni Gel Cook!Email: john.cook@londonmet.ac.ukHome page: http://staffweb.londonmet.ac.uk/~cookj1/Twitter: http://twitter.com/johnnigelcookSlideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/johnnigelcookMusic wiki: http://johnnigelcook.wetpaint.com/page/MusicAcademia.edu: http://londonmet.academia.edu/JohnCook/AboutBlip.fm: http://blip.fm/johnnigelcook

3. StructureRelevance & jargon busterLies, Damned Lies and Statistics!CONTSENS projectContext of urban educationReuse in context of language learningConclusions & Future

4. Relevance for learning and teaching (Horizon, 2011) Do not have to buy or maintain: virtually every postsecondary student has a mobilePortability and Internet-capabilityStore of reference materials and learning experiences, Fieldwork to record observations via voice, text, or multimediaConvergence of several technologieselectronic book readers, location-based services, annotation toolsapplications for creation and composition, and social networking tools.

5. Jargon BusterMOBILE LEARNING. “Mobile learning … is not about delivering content to mobiledevices but, instead, about the processes of coming to know and being able to operatesuccessfully in, and across, new and ever changing contexts and learning spaces.” (Pachler, Bachmair and Cook, 2010, p. 6)LOCATION BASED LEARNING.“Location-based learning takes advantage of the ability of mobile devices to know where they are located and deliver information that is time-and-place-relevant.” (Horizon, 2009)

6. Jargon BusterVISUALISATIONS. Formats can include images, maps, 2-D or 3-D animation, 3D models, timelines and Augmented Reality (AR) environments.Learner Generated Content. Using digital devices to capture photos, videos, interviews, reflections, etc. <clip quote2> from Managing Events studentsfor detail see Cook, Pachlerand Bradley (2008).

7. Visualisationsand mixed realityAllow people to study objects that are too fragile to be physically handled, to reconstruct past events and landscapes, or to see behind the scene ‘on location’

8. Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics!Image credit: http://www.swifteconomics.com/2009/08/14/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics-a-primer/

9. Stats from mobiThinking, (27th September 2011)There are 5.3 billion mobile subscribersthat's 77 percent of the world populationGrowth is led by China and IndiaDoes your VLE offer that reach?

10. Half a billion people accessed mobile Internet worldwide in 2009. Usage is expected to double within five years as mobile overtakes the PC as the most popular way to get on the Web.Just in China there are 277 million mobile Web users.

11. Web-enabled handsetsBy 2011, over 85 percent of new handsets will be able to access the mobile WebIn US and W. Europe, it is already surpassed thatLots of new handsets support 3G fast InternetSmartphonesare only a fraction of Web-enabled phones

12. Unlimited data plansWidespread availability of unlimited data plans drove mobile media in Japan, now it’s driving the US; but in W. Europe, lack of availability is holding up progress.Image credit: http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/03/18/26overview.h29.html

13. CONTSENS PROJECT(see handout)

14. Context Sensitive Mobile Learning See http://bit.ly/oU9bjInvolved European-wide consortium headed by Ericsson Education, Ireland.Cistercian AbbeysUrban Planning Tour Second Language LearningMarketingEuropean Projects - CONTSENS

15. European Projects - CONTSENS

16. The gap between the physical space (Cistercian ruins) and the 3D mobile space is inhabited by the shared cognition of the students (Cook, 2010) <clip>

17. Focus of this talk on the successful reuse of the context of one subject (urban education) in another (language learning) Rapid reconfiguration of the required scripts/information within the mobile device mediated augmented space for learning.

18. Both tours (urban education and each of the language tours) use the same physical space Used and evaluated with representative teachers and learners, feedback was very positive (see Smith et al, 2011, for detail).

19. Context of urban education

20. Work Package 4:Training for Urban Education

21. The initial tour was developed with the aim of enabling HE students to visualise urban education through various collective images and representations. A tutor had developed the original tour in North London and was closely involved in the creation of the mobile tour.

22. The development and production process involved the following elements: (i) Initial field work and documentation of the site; (ii) Learning narratives/scripts for each task episode in a GPS zone, (iii) Capture and digitisation of oral histories, Pathé news clips and local historical stories,

23. (iv) Capture and digitisation of material elements that detail changes in the urban form, such as photographs depicting the evolution of school buildings and historical maps, and (v) MEDIASCAPE (location-based mobile production to support the underlying pedagogy of the tour).

27. Evaluation22 studentstook part in the first trial in 3 distinct groups

28. Feedback:

29. CONTSENS questionnaire

30. informal group interviews afterwards

31. Tutor feedback:

32. interview Enhancement of the learning experience91% thought the mobile device enhanced the learning experienceThe information was easy to assimilate allowing more time to concentrate on tasks. Allowed instant reflection in situ.The mobile tour promoted “active learning” they were less passive than they would have been on a tutor-led tour they were not “merely taking in information” the mobile tour triggered their own thoughts and encouraged them to think more about the area

33. “The information given was underlined by the 'experience' of the area and therefore given context in both past and present.”

34. “it was triggering my own thoughts and I was getting to think for myself about the area and the buildings.”

35. Reuse in Language LearningWould our pre-existing spatial design act as a catalyst and activate the abilities of language learners if carried out in situ? The tour was translated into four languages: German (next slide), Spanish, Italian and French but the content remained exactly the same. The users were tested in the classroom using this content as text only and then in situ using our design.

37. Reusing another iteration of our design here for language learning was very easy and quick to achieveWe see as a pointer to the generality of our approach

38. 9 international students used the software in the same location as that used for the Urban Education tour. Their command of English ranged from that of the beginner to intermediate.

39. 89% rated it as being useful for learning the subject. 100% thought the mobile device enhanced the learning experience, 2 users made comments that it provided them with “situated learning”:“Situated learning.”“Situating your learning experience”

40. 2 others said that it made it more concrete and real: “More concrete.”; “Made it more real.”. 3 suggest that they found it to be a new and interesting way to learn languages: “Better than a course book for languages.”; “It was an excellent new approach to learning languages.”; “It allowed me to learn English in interesting way.”They all agreed that the mobile learning experience was fun (33.33% answered ‘strongly agree).

41. ConclusionsSeveral group interviews participants commented that the mobile tour promoted “active learning” students were less passive than they would have been on a tutor-led tour (some learners had also taken the ‘analogue’ tour).

42. The tutor of urban tour stated that students can take more control over their learning,they can be engaged in more productive pedagogical approaches, such as small group work and investigative problem-based learning. mobile tour afforded the opportunity to be more focused, but at the same time provides a multi-tasked and multimedia experience that allows students to get below the surface of the tasks.mobile technologies employed excited and intrigued the students, and helped them to become more engaged in the tour.

43. One aspect that is common to both of the studies is that our design has fostered active learning.As the content was pushed to the mobile devices it engaged the learners in the task, and encouraged them to interact withthe material and learning content on the devicesthe physical environment and the other students in their group.

44. The tasks then made them think and reflect on what they were looking at and being asked to do (a finding from Iteration 1). Another common aspect was that the whole learning experience was “more concrete” and “real” because it took place in situ, and was directly related to the learning context.

45. We (Smith et al., 2011) claim that the mobile tours appear to be acting as part of what Vygotsky calls the ‘more capable peer’ Assisting the learners as they move through stages of development in the Zone of Proximal Development. However, further issues about scaling up were surfaced which we return to in future work.

46. The Future?Technology Outlook UK Tertiary Education 2011-2016http://www.nmc.org/publications/2011-technology-outlook-uk

47. All three advisory boards — a group of 108 acknowledged experts — agree thatMobiles will likely tip into mainstream use in educational settings in the coming yearEmbedded in the mobiles category in previous NMC Horizon Reports, tablet computing has emerged as a topic distinct from smart phones and tablet PCs

48. The availability of educational content for mobile devices is increasing as more providers develop for these platforms.Gartner Research projects Internet-capable mobile devices will outnumber PCs by 2013As we have seem, promoting active and deep learning with mobiles is a challenge, but one at LTRI we think it is worth rising to.

49. What next? Trans-reality?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzIBZQkj6SYSituated learning that is fun?

50. Thank you & ReferencesCook, J. (2010). Mobile Phones as Mediating Tools Within Augmented Contexts for Development. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2(3), 1-12. (see http://bit.ly/czg9k6&nbsp or email for pre-print)Cook, J., Pachler, N. and Bradley, C. (2008). Bridging the Gap? Mobile Phones at the Interface between Informal and Formal Learning. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, Spring. Available from: http://www.rcetj.org/index.php/rcetj/article/view/34Horizon (2009 ). Horizon Report Australia-New Zealand Edition. Web version: http://wp.nmc.org/horizon-anz-2009/section/location-based-learning/, accessed 28 October, 2010. Horizon (2011). Technology Outlook UK Tertiary Education 2011-2016. http://www.nmc.org/publications/2011-technology-outlook-ukPachler, N., Bachmair, B. and Cook, J. (2010). Mobile Learning: Structures, Agency, Practices. New York: Springer.Smith, C., Bradley, C., Cook, J. and Pratt-Adams, S. (2011). Designing for Active Learning: Putting Learning into Context with Mobile Devices. In Anders D. Olofsson and J. Ola Lindberg (Eds), Informed Design of Educational Technologies in Higher Education: Enhanced Learning and Teaching. IGI Global. Due 2011.