Sentinel Landscapes and Component 3: links in the CRP6CIFOR-ICRAF
Component 3 of the CGIAR Research Programme on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (CRP6) focuses on landscape management for environmental services (ES), biodiversity conservation and livelihoods. This presentation explores the links between the various themes of CRP6 Component 3 and the cross-cutting CRP6 research theme of sentinel landscapes. How these links fit into a broader context of the CGIAR’s strategic results framework is also discussed.
This presentation formed part of the CRP6 Sentinel Landscape planning workshop held on 30 September – 1 October 2011 at CIFOR’s headquarters in Bogor, Indonesia. Further information on CRP6 and Sentinel Landscapes can be accessed from http://www.cifor.org/crp6/ and http://www.cifor.org/fileadmin/subsites/crp/CRP6-Sentinel-Landscape-workplan_2011-2014.pdf respectively.
Participatory natural resources management through multiple interventions at ...ILRI
Poster prepared by Kindu Mekonnen, Zenebe Adimassu and Bezaye Gorfu at the International Conference on Ecosystem Conservation and Sustainable Development (ECOCASD 2011), Ambo University, Ethiopia, 10-12 February 2011.
Sentinel Landscapes and Component 3: links in the CRP6CIFOR-ICRAF
Component 3 of the CGIAR Research Programme on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (CRP6) focuses on landscape management for environmental services (ES), biodiversity conservation and livelihoods. This presentation explores the links between the various themes of CRP6 Component 3 and the cross-cutting CRP6 research theme of sentinel landscapes. How these links fit into a broader context of the CGIAR’s strategic results framework is also discussed.
This presentation formed part of the CRP6 Sentinel Landscape planning workshop held on 30 September – 1 October 2011 at CIFOR’s headquarters in Bogor, Indonesia. Further information on CRP6 and Sentinel Landscapes can be accessed from http://www.cifor.org/crp6/ and http://www.cifor.org/fileadmin/subsites/crp/CRP6-Sentinel-Landscape-workplan_2011-2014.pdf respectively.
Participatory natural resources management through multiple interventions at ...ILRI
Poster prepared by Kindu Mekonnen, Zenebe Adimassu and Bezaye Gorfu at the International Conference on Ecosystem Conservation and Sustainable Development (ECOCASD 2011), Ambo University, Ethiopia, 10-12 February 2011.
Presentation by David Lamb on alternative methods for tropical forest restoration. Besides large scale reforestation activities, David Lamb argues to look for smaller scale silvicultural alternatives as well which are more suitable for farmers.
Eddie Allison (WorldFish). Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change: Vietnam's Aquaculture Sector. Presented at CCAFS Science Meeting, 1-2 December 2010
Presentation by David Lamb on alternative methods for tropical forest restoration. Besides large scale reforestation activities, David Lamb argues to look for smaller scale silvicultural alternatives as well which are more suitable for farmers.
Eddie Allison (WorldFish). Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change: Vietnam's Aquaculture Sector. Presented at CCAFS Science Meeting, 1-2 December 2010
Presentación realizada por la Compañía Nacional de Abastecimiento de Brasil, en el marco de la Pasantía Técnica sobre instrumentos de gestión de los Sistemas Públicos de Abastecimiento y Comercialización de Alimentos, realizada los días 10 a 12 de agosto de 2016, en Brasilia, Brasil.
Poster on Rainwater harvesting system to ensure sustainability of smallholder farmers: climate challenge, research question, practice description, technical aspects, implementation, results and contribution to climate-smart agriculture (CSA) pillars. Author: CCAFS Latin America. Please credit accordingly.
La Mesa Técnica Agroclimática del Eje Cafetero, presenta el primer boletín de recomendaciones para el sector Agropecuario, para el trimestre noviembre, diciembre 2016 y enero 2017.
Presentation by Sara Namirembe,World Agroforestry Centre, at the 2012 Agriculture and Rural Development Day in Rio de Janiero, Learning Event No. 1, Session 3: A case of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. http://www.agricultureday.org
The Accelerating Impact of CGIAR Climate Research for Africa (AICCRA) project works to deliver a climate-smart African future driven by science and innovation in agriculture.
AICCRA does this by enhancing access to climate information services and climate-smart agricultural technology to millions of smallholder farmers in Africa.
With better access to climate technology and advisory services—linked to information about effective response measures—farmers can better anticipate climate-related events and take preventative action that help communities better safeguard their livelihoods and the environment.
AICCRA is supported by a grant from the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank, which is used to enhance research and capacity-building activities by the CGIAR centers and initiatives as well as their partners in Africa.
About IDA: IDA helps the world’s poorest countries by providing grants and low to zero-interest loans for projects and programmes that boost economic growth, reduce poverty, and improve poor people’s lives.
IDA is one of the largest sources of assistance for the world’s 76 poorest countries, 39 of which are in Africa.
Annual IDA commitments have averaged about $21 billion over circa 2017-2020, with approximately 61 percent going to Africa.
This presentation was given on 27 October 2021 by Mengpin Ge, Global Climate Program Associate at WRI, during the webinar "Achieving NDC Ambition in Agriculture" organized by CCAFS, FAO and WRI.
Find the recording and more information here: https://bit.ly/AchievingNDCs
This presentation was given on 27 October 2021 by Sabrina Rose, Policy Consultant at CCAFS, during the webinar "Achieving NDC Ambition in Agriculture" organized by CCAFS, FAO and WRI.
Find the recording and more information here: https://bit.ly/AchievingNDCs
This presentation was given on 27 October 2021 by Krystal Crumpler, Climate Change and Agricultural Specialist at FAO, during the webinar "Achieving NDC Ambition in Agriculture" organized by CCAFS, FAO and WRI.
Find the recording and more information here: https://bit.ly/AchievingNDCs
This presentation was meant to be included in the 2021 CLIFF-GRADS Welcome Webinar and presented by Ciniro Costa Jr. (CCAFS).
The webinar recording can be found here: https://youtu.be/UoX6aoC4fhQ
The multilevel CSA monitoring set of standard core uptake and outcome indicators + expanded indicators linked to a rapid and reliable ICT based data collection instrument to systematically
assess and monitor:
- CSA Adoption/ Access to CIS
- CSA effects on food security and livelihoods household level)
- CSA effects on farm performance
Presented by Harsh Rajpal, Code Partners Pte. Ltd., on 30 June 2021 at the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Webinar on Sustainable Protein Case Study: Outputs and Synthesis of Results.
Presented by Ciniro Costa Jr., CCAFS, on 28 June 2021 at the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Webinar on Sustainable Protein Case Study: Outputs and Synthesis of Results.
Presented by Marion de Vries, Wageningen Livestock Research at Wageningen University, on 28 June 2021 at the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Webinar on Sustainable Protein Case Study: Outputs and Synthesis of Results.
Presented by Issac Emery, Informed Sustainability Consulting, on 29 June 2021 at the second day of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Webinar on Sustainable Protein Case Study: Outputs and Synthesis of Results.
Presented by Hongmin Dong and Sha Wei, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), on 28 June 2021 at the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Webinar on Sustainable Protein Case Study: Outputs and Synthesis of Results.
Presented by Lini Wollenberg, CCAFS, on 28 June 2021 at the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Webinar on Sustainable Protein Case Study: Outputs and Synthesis of Results.
Presentation by Han Soethoudt, Jan Broeze, and Heike Axmann of Wageningen University & Resaearch (WUR).
WUR and Olam Rice Nigeria conducted a controlled experiment in Nigeria in which mechanized rice harvesting and threshing were introduced on smallholder farms. The result of the study shows that mechanization considerably reduces losses, has a positive impact on farmers’ income, and the climate.
Learn more: https://www.wur.nl/en/news-wur/show-day/Mechanization-helps-Nigerian-farms-reduce-food-loss-and-increase-income.htm
Presentation on the rapid evidence review findings and key take away messages.
Current evidence for biodiversity and agriculture to achieve and bridging gaps in research and investment to reach multiple global goals.
This presentation was given at an internal workshop in April 2020 and was presented by Le Hoang Anh, Hoang Thi Thien Huong, Le Thi Thanh Huyen, and Nguyen Thi Lien Huong.
Delivering information for national low-emission development strategies: acti...
Pulleman - Biodiversity and climate resilience
1. Biodiversity and Climate Resilience
in Agricultural Landscapes
Mirjam Pulleman
agroBIODIVERSITY International Project Office,
DIVERSITAS
Biodiversity and Climate Resilience in
Agricultural Landscapes
1. agroBIODIVERSITY research for sustainable
agricultural landscapes and rural livelihoods
2. Joint meeting CCAFS/DIVERSITAS/CRP6 (26-
28 November 2010, Chiapas)
– Filter and buffer functions provided by
(agro)biodiversity & vulnerability/adaptation to
climate change
– Identification of synergies and potential research
topics for collaboration
1
2. agroBIODIVERSITY
• The challenge for agriculture will be to increase
productivity of agriculture, while addressing risk
and variability
• Such focus should address the critical human
and economic dimensions, and environmental
outputs, e.g. GHG emissions, other ecosystem
services and biodiversity loss.
• Eco-efficiency / ecological intensification =>
addresses synergies and trade-offs among a
host of production, conservation, economic, and
social values at landscape scale (e.g., Groot et
al., 2007). Keating et al. 2010
agroBIODIVERSITY
Who are we? What binds us?
– The drivers of biodiversity conservation in
agricultural landscapes and trade-
offs/synergies with sustainable agricultural
production
– The role of AGBD for sustainability/resilience/
adaptation of agriculture and rural livelihoods,
in different social/ecological domains
– How to engage local stakeholders in
sustainable landscape management?
2
3. agroBIODIVERSITY
• Wild and agricultural biodiversity within the landscape
mosaic interact in affecting ecosystem goods and
services at multiple scales (plot to landscape level)
Synergies (and trade-offs) across multiple scales
Courtesy Claire Kremen
3
4. agroBIODIVERSITY
Agrobiodiversity; Management of local resources in a
global /regional context
A key aim of analysis is to identify enabling policies that can create a greater
space for local innovation response and strengthen local communities
influence at higher scales (Giller et al. 2008).
agroBIODIVERSITY
Planning for future uncertainty – sustainagility
Keep options open – trade-offs in time?
Jackson et al., 2010
4
5. agroBIODIVERSITY
• Ecosystems potentially show nonlinear
responses to land-use intensification that would
open management options with limited
ecological losses but satisfying economic gains
(Dewenter et al 2007)
• Climate change and scarcity of resources can
change/have changed these dynamics
• Need for interdisciplinary studies to quantify
ecological and socioeconomic tradeoffs (in
space and time) under different levels of
agricultural intensification and trajectories
Current Biodiversity-based
dominant trend alternative pathway
High
Natural forest Agroforest
domain
environmental services
Biodiversity &
Adapted from Brussaard et al., 2010
Low external
input agro-
ecosystems
Intensive
agroecosys-
tem domain
Degrading
Degraded, aban- agricultural
doned land landscapes
Low
Low High
Agricultural production
5
6. agroBIODIVERSITY
•Eight research sites, 6 biodiversity hotspots
AGROFOREST FRAGILE, INTESIVE AG
NATURAL DEGRADING
FOREST LANSCAPE
Indonesia
India Mexico
Forest Cover
Brazil California
Burkina Faso Netherlands
Degradation Recovering
agroBIODIVERSITY
- 200-500 km-2
landscapes
positioned along a
biodiversity-production
gradient in a wide range
socio-economic
conditions
- Builds upon local
research teams and
participatory
experimentation with
diversified production
Jackson et al., in prep.
systems/landscapes
6
7. Native forest
Agroforestry
Sun-coffee
Participatory agroforestry
research
Zona da Mata, BR
(de Sousa et al., in prep)
Zona da Mata, BR
Tree species
NFV2
NFV1 (de Sousa et al., in prep)
NFA9
NFA8
AFD1 • Multiple ecosystem services
AFA7
AFA3
AFA6
• Livelihoods / food security
AFA5
AFA2 • Trade-offs
AFA4
AFA1
0.04 0.2 0.36 0.52 0.68 0.84 1
• Adaptation to climate change
Sorensen's Coefficient
Tree families
NFV2
NFV1
NFA9
NFA8
AFA6
AFA4
AFA2
AFA7
AFA5
AFD1
AFA3
AFA1
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
SØorensen's Coefficient
7
8. 40
oC
SC MAX
30
AF MAX
NF MAX Climate
20
SC MIN
change
resilience
AF MIN
10
NF MIN
+3oC
0
Loss: 69
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AGO SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTH
%
1.0
NF*D1
Cmic
Total N
TOC
Silt
CO2
qMic Nmin
Mg
CEC NF*A1 Al sat
CaK Al
NF*A2 H+Al
pH
AF*D1
P
Sand
Base Sat AF*A2
Soil fertility Also: Coffee productivity
SC*D1 SC*A1
SC*A2 AF*A1 and soil C Economics incl. labour
Clay
qMet
Zona da Mata, BR
-1.0
0-10
cm
(de Sousa et al, in prep)
-1.0 1.0
La Sepultura Reserve and buffer zone,
Chiapas
DRIVERS: IMPACT:
Landscape-level Field-based assessment of
forest cover analysis riparian woody plant
using Landsat data diversity and soil quality
from different yrs
(Jackson et al, in prep)
La Sepultura, MX
8
9. Participatory
modeling and
consensus
building
Multi-agent
modiling
And: Participatory
implementation of fodder trees
for climate change adaptation
and forest conservation
agroBIODIVERSITY
Work in progress: Integration across 8 sites – connect
global and local learning:
Collection of a minimum common data set from all sites
Synthesis of results across sites to show agricultural
production-biodiversity relationships, and potential for
resilience/adaptation to (climate) change based on
assets (N, F, S, H, P capital)
Identifying biodiversity-based adaptation pathways in a
given landscape domain
Testing of hypotheses in field sites
9
10. Biodiversity and Climate Resilience in
Agricultural Landscapes
1. agroBIODIVERSITY research for sustainable
agricultural landscapes and rural livelihoods
2. Joint meeting CCAFS/DIVERSITAS/CRP6 (26-
28 November 2010, Chiapas)
– Filter and buffer functions provided by
(agro)biodiversity & vulnerability/adaptation to
climate change
– Identification of synergies and potential research
topics for collaboration
26‐28 November 2010
DIVERSITAS (ESSP) CCAFS (CGIAR/ESSP) // CRP7
Agrobiodiversity network Climate change agriculture and
food systems
8-site global comparison
3- focal regions, interest
of consequences of
in broader scope; Linking
agricultural intensification
adaptation, mitigation &
poverty agenda’s
Chiapas site hosts (ECOSUR)
Exploring shared
agenda’s for
research, November
Friday Synergies in site
27 & 28
November networks, Joint
funding Exploring a
26 visit to Forest, Tree, Agroforestry // CRP6 joint
‘learning CIFOR, ICRAF, Bioversity, CIAT
research
landscape’ Sentinel landscapes
agenda
across forest/tree cover
transition, focus on
‘ecosystem services’
10
11. Joint meeting
CCAFS/DIVERSITAS/CRP6
Goals of the project
• Enhance knowledge on the way filter and buffer
functions provided by agrobiodiversity reduce
human vulnerability to climate change across a
wide range of settings
• Support current development efforts to reduce
human vulnerability through identification of
current ‘best practice’ and promote the use of
such approaches
Variability of Variability of Human vulnerability to
climate water flows floods & droughts
Vulnerability
Resiliency
Tolerated range
range
range
Landscape
filter & buffer
functions
Currently Currently Focus of ‘adapta-
increasing decreasing tion stragegies’?
Preventable increase
in exposure
M. Van Noordwijk
11
12. Adaptation
options
M. Van Noordwijk
Social stressors originating within
Persistence and among community/ies
Shielding Economic stressors
Climatic stressors: networks due to market
means, variability fluctuations & policy
and change Market shifts
Landscape access &
buffers & insurance
filters Pover
M. Van Noordwijk -ty?
Resource
Innovation
accessibility
support
Access to under- Access to new
utilized resources for markets, satisfying new
innovative use types of demand
Change M. Van Noordwijk
12
13. Multidimensional Buffer-Filters create “Shields” that can differ among local groups
with different coping/adapting conditions.
Physical/Financial
Wealth
Before BUFFER-FILTERING After BUFFER-FILTERING
Land Tenure
Time series of percieved
Eco-Tecnology Norms and Laws
Climate Variable “A”
Big Coffee producers
low
Time series of have a shield based on
m
Climate Variable “A”
Wealth and Market institutions
diu
me
Tree Cover
h
hig
Local Cooperative
Institutions
Physical/Financial
Wealth Small Coffee producers
have a shield based on
high medium low
local cooperation and
Time series of agroforestry technology
Climate Variable “A”
Land Tenure Time series of percieved
Norms and Laws Climate Variable “A”
Eco-Tecnology
L. Garcia Barrios
San Cristóbal Meeting Nov 26-28
Local Cooperative Tree Cover
Institutions
26 November: Field trip
13
14. Where would you like
to see more trees?
27 Nov: Conceptual frameworks,
hypotheses and methods
28 Nov: Modalities for cooperation,
sites and research priorities
14
15. Boundary research / adaptive research
A.Communicate
Current understanding of buffers ‘ready to use’ Global
& filters as intermediate between science governance
external drivers (incl. climate, of the climate
social, economic) and local change
livelihood options & vulnerability challenge
B. Facilitate multi-
C.Priority issues
scale mitigadap-
for new science
tation approaches
Site level multistakeholder complexity of
‘driving forces’ and ‘intervention points’
relevance of ‘negotiation support’
A. Science ready to be communicated
• Conserving and utilizing AB at different scales is necessary for
sustaining livelihoods of poor farmers by increasing the flow of
provisioning services and the stability of such flows, hence leading to
food security, especially in the face of enviro/economic stressors.
• Institutional issues related to secure access/control of natural capital
(incl land tenure) are key for climate change mitigation and adaptation
through the use of AB. Ecological buffers have the potential to benefit
both adaptation and mitigation.
• Strong social capital is a key social filter/buffer by poor farmer
communities to enhance the capacity of adaptation through improved
coping strategies (& change beyond coping)
• Any measure to be taken has to be accompanied by consideration of
potential social, economic and environmental trade-offs in a multi-
stakeholder landscape and global linkages between them (e.g. in the
case of biofuel production on land suitable for food production).
15
16. C. Priority research
• Forecasting
– How can forecast models be made more relevant to the
society in specific local contexts, by integrating societal
needs, critical drivers, thresholds, and emerging properties
at the appropriate temporal and spatial scales?
• Observing
– How do people’s situation, knowledge and behavior affect
ecosystems and their services and vice versa, in a context of
adaptation?
• Confining
– How will the spatial and temporal configuration of ecological
and social buffers and filters increase the sustainability and
efficiency of adaptation policies and projects?
• Responding
– What are the governance and institutional mechanisms for
enhancing buffers and filters, depending on the context, and
what their cost, benefit and distributional effects?
• Innovating
– Where is innovation needed for enhancing buffers and filters
and how can these buffers and filters act as incentives for
further innovation?
16
17. Innovating
Forecasting Observing
Research sites
• Represent different climate risks (rainfall variability, drought,
storms, flooding)
• Agroecological conditions (regions)
• Different institutional settings (countries)
• Social norms (communities)
• Endowment (farm)
Analogue sites? =>
does it work for landscapes?
17
18. Acknowledgements
• Meine van Noordwijk and all participants
• The agroBIODIVERSITY network
Louise Jackson, Lijbert Brussaard, Kamal Bawa, Irene Cardoso, Luis Garcia
Barrios, George Brown,Elisée Ouedraogo, Unai Pascual, Peter de Ruiter,
Teja Tscharntke, Meine van Noordwijk
Thank you!
agroBIODIVERSITY site – the Netherlands – intensive ag
18