The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in Ukraine about options for humanitarian and trade relations between Ukraine and uncontrolled territories in eastern Ukraine. Some key findings:
- Respondents were most supportive of maintaining humanitarian relations like allowing movement of people and payment of pensions, while implementing an economic blockade.
- There was support for allowing trade in essential goods from Ukraine to the uncontrolled territories.
- If Ukraine regains control of the territories, respondents favored locally elected authorities over authorities appointed by Kyiv, and allowing local input in appointing police and judicial positions.
- Healthcare and education workers in the territories would generally be allowed to keep their jobs under Ukrainian control.
The last population census in Nigeria was conducted in 2006; which puts our population figure at approximately 140million. According to our law, another census will hold in 2 years time, since we practise democracy, which is a game of number, our population counts for who would like to govern at each level of government.
Equally important is the participation of Nigerians in the electioneering process. In order to vote and be voted for, 18years is the minimum, how have we fared in terms of awareness and participating in the process that elect those who govern us – local, state and federal governments?
This study takes a look at Nigeria population, political participation since the start of Democracy in 1999 and an estimate of the 2014 projected population, and hopefully to create awareness on the need to be more involved in the electioneering process.
Data from the first wave of the survey of the Kalmius groupDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in Ukraine regarding resolving the conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Some key findings:
- Respondents were more likely to expect dialogue and negotiations rather than intensification of military operations to resolve the conflict within the year.
- A majority saw continued military activities by self-proclaimed separatist groups as worsening the problem, while international negotiations and sanctions on Russia were viewed as potentially helping to solve it.
- Payment of pensions in non-government controlled areas and introducing a federal system of governance in Ukraine had mixed views, while elections in separatist areas before control and separation from Ukraine were largely unacceptable.
The document contains tables showing voter turnout rates from 1980 to 2008 for US nationwide as well as several states for both presidential election years and off year elections. It also includes tables comparing each state's turnout to the nationwide turnout for presidential and off year elections, averaging the differences from 1980 to 2000 and 1980 to 2004.
This document summarizes key findings from the 2011 Indian Census regarding housing, household amenities, and assets in Kerala, India. Some of the main results presented include:
- 74.2% of households in Kerala availed banking services, an increase from 51.1% in 2001.
- 76.8% of households possessed a television, up from 38.8% in 2001. Ownership of radios/transistors declined to 29.7% from 59.2% over the same period.
- Mobile phone ownership increased dramatically to 78.1% of households from 19.1% in 2001. Landline telephone access also rose but to a lesser extent, reaching 89.7% in 2011.
IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR), www.iosrphr.org, call for paper, research...iosrphr_editor
This study examined socio-demographic factors associated with perinatal mortality in a rural area of central India over one year. The perinatal mortality rate was found to be 17.07 per 1000 live births. Early age at pregnancy, illiteracy, rural residence, and low socioeconomic status were commonly associated with higher perinatal deaths. Effective measures to reduce perinatal mortality need to target improving education for women, employment opportunities, and healthcare access in rural areas.
This survey summarizes data from the first wave of a survey conducted in Ukraine regarding the conflict in eastern Ukraine. It provides details on the methodology and demographics of 1975 respondents surveyed by phone from April 14 to May 2, 2018. The summary includes responses to questions about expectations for resolving the conflict, views on potential measures and international initiatives, and levels of acceptability for various arrangements between Ukraine and eastern territories.
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in Ukraine regarding the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Key findings include:
- A majority of respondents expect dialogue and negotiations to resolve the conflict rather than intensification of military operations.
- Respondents had mixed views on whether various measures like military operations, sanctions, or negotiations would help resolve or worsen the conflict.
- Most respondents viewed direct Russian military intervention or continued activities by separatist groups as likely to worsen the conflict.
- There was no consensus on international initiatives or domestic political arrangements between Ukraine and separatist regions.
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, and key details of the survey, including that it was conducted throughout Ukraine except occupied territories, with a sample of 2,400 residents and an additional 1,378 residents surveyed in Donetsk and Luhansk. The survey was funded by the Government of Canada and had a margin of error of +/- 2%.
The last population census in Nigeria was conducted in 2006; which puts our population figure at approximately 140million. According to our law, another census will hold in 2 years time, since we practise democracy, which is a game of number, our population counts for who would like to govern at each level of government.
Equally important is the participation of Nigerians in the electioneering process. In order to vote and be voted for, 18years is the minimum, how have we fared in terms of awareness and participating in the process that elect those who govern us – local, state and federal governments?
This study takes a look at Nigeria population, political participation since the start of Democracy in 1999 and an estimate of the 2014 projected population, and hopefully to create awareness on the need to be more involved in the electioneering process.
Data from the first wave of the survey of the Kalmius groupDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in Ukraine regarding resolving the conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Some key findings:
- Respondents were more likely to expect dialogue and negotiations rather than intensification of military operations to resolve the conflict within the year.
- A majority saw continued military activities by self-proclaimed separatist groups as worsening the problem, while international negotiations and sanctions on Russia were viewed as potentially helping to solve it.
- Payment of pensions in non-government controlled areas and introducing a federal system of governance in Ukraine had mixed views, while elections in separatist areas before control and separation from Ukraine were largely unacceptable.
The document contains tables showing voter turnout rates from 1980 to 2008 for US nationwide as well as several states for both presidential election years and off year elections. It also includes tables comparing each state's turnout to the nationwide turnout for presidential and off year elections, averaging the differences from 1980 to 2000 and 1980 to 2004.
This document summarizes key findings from the 2011 Indian Census regarding housing, household amenities, and assets in Kerala, India. Some of the main results presented include:
- 74.2% of households in Kerala availed banking services, an increase from 51.1% in 2001.
- 76.8% of households possessed a television, up from 38.8% in 2001. Ownership of radios/transistors declined to 29.7% from 59.2% over the same period.
- Mobile phone ownership increased dramatically to 78.1% of households from 19.1% in 2001. Landline telephone access also rose but to a lesser extent, reaching 89.7% in 2011.
IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR), www.iosrphr.org, call for paper, research...iosrphr_editor
This study examined socio-demographic factors associated with perinatal mortality in a rural area of central India over one year. The perinatal mortality rate was found to be 17.07 per 1000 live births. Early age at pregnancy, illiteracy, rural residence, and low socioeconomic status were commonly associated with higher perinatal deaths. Effective measures to reduce perinatal mortality need to target improving education for women, employment opportunities, and healthcare access in rural areas.
This survey summarizes data from the first wave of a survey conducted in Ukraine regarding the conflict in eastern Ukraine. It provides details on the methodology and demographics of 1975 respondents surveyed by phone from April 14 to May 2, 2018. The summary includes responses to questions about expectations for resolving the conflict, views on potential measures and international initiatives, and levels of acceptability for various arrangements between Ukraine and eastern territories.
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted in Ukraine regarding the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Key findings include:
- A majority of respondents expect dialogue and negotiations to resolve the conflict rather than intensification of military operations.
- Respondents had mixed views on whether various measures like military operations, sanctions, or negotiations would help resolve or worsen the conflict.
- Most respondents viewed direct Russian military intervention or continued activities by separatist groups as likely to worsen the conflict.
- There was no consensus on international initiatives or domestic political arrangements between Ukraine and separatist regions.
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, and key details of the survey, including that it was conducted throughout Ukraine except occupied territories, with a sample of 2,400 residents and an additional 1,378 residents surveyed in Donetsk and Luhansk. The survey was funded by the Government of Canada and had a margin of error of +/- 2%.
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, April – May, 2017DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, response rates, and funding source. An oversample was also conducted in Ukrainian-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts with 1,378 respondents. The survey aimed to be representative of the Ukrainian population by factors such as gender, age, region and settlement size.
This document provides sales performance data for various brands and products across different regions in India. It shows growth percentages for years 2019-2022 for general trade, modern trade and CNC channels. It also provides breakdown of sales by small cities and clusters within Karnataka and Kerala. Overall, the south region saw 15% growth in 2021 and 1% growth YTD 2022. Karnataka saw 16% growth in 2021 and 4% growth YTD, while Kerala saw 21% growth in 2021 and 1% growth YTD. Skin care, hair care and oral care products performed well across regions.
Predictions of decline made on 1.09.20 have not held.
There has been a spurt in deaths in the key states of Maharashtra, Karnataka and Delhi that is still continuing.
Punjab and UP are especially worrying
Very recent trends are again showing stability/decline in deaths
The document provides a baseline analysis of various villages surveyed by sample population. It includes details such as:
- Village wise population sample sizes ranging from 6 to 103 people surveyed per village totaling 667 people.
- Age and gender distribution showing majority are females aged below 15 years or between 15-21 years.
- Education levels showing majority have primary education with more females lacking education compared to males.
- Employment status showing over 40% are daily wage workers and 25% unemployed.
CommunicAsia 2022: Global IPv6 deployment - five years onAPNIC
APNIC Services Team Lead - South East Asia Anna Mulingbayan gives an update on global IPv6 deployment at CommunicAsia 2022 in Singapore from 1 to 3 June 2022.
The document provides population and economic statistics for an administrative region from 2009 to 2015. Some key points:
- The total population declined slightly from over 1 million in 2009 to just under 1 million in 2015, with the urban population remaining around 356,000-357,000.
- The number of employed increased from around 322,000 to over 366,000 while unemployment fell from 5.3% to 4.5%.
- The number of enterprises grew from 5,492 to over 6,300, with the majority being small and micro-sized. The industrial, wholesale, and transportation sectors employed the most people.
- Agricultural land was predominantly used for cereals and forage. Milk and dairy
- The SOHO Package was launched in October 2017 to target small businesses and is the only hybrid package that converts to prepaid after postpaid incentives are used.
- As of September 2018, 49,000 packages had been sold with an active customer base of 36,816. Most customers only remain active for 3 months or less.
- Revenue from the postpaid component totaled 22.6 million Pakistani rupees through September with an additional 7.7 million from prepaid usage. However, bill recovery is only around 75% with most customers not paying monthly bills.
Main Output Evaluation of National Leading Committte for Rural Development an...swgardlao
The document provides an evaluation of poverty and development in Lao PDR based on a nationwide survey conducted in early 2011. Key findings include:
- 198,678 families (18.86%) and 3,175 villages (36.69%) were found to be in poverty.
- 494,825 families (46.98%) and 883 villages (10.20%) met the criteria for development.
- Targets for 2011-2015 include reducing the poverty rate to under 19% of the population and 10% of households, and building over half of villages to developed status.
- Priority programs and activities for 2011-2012 focus on generating income for poor households, developing infrastructure and social services,
This document provides demographic data on substance abuse treatment admissions across various agencies in Michigan for fiscal year 2012. It includes information on gender, age, race/ethnicity, primary substance reported, education level, employment status, income, and living arrangements for 61,093 total admissions. For each agency, the percentages of clients in different demographic categories are shown, along with the total number of admissions for that agency. Statewide demographic percentages are also provided at the bottom.
This document provides demographic data on substance abuse treatment admissions across various agencies in Michigan for fiscal year 2012. It includes information on gender, age, race/ethnicity, primary substance reported, education level, employment status, income, and living arrangements for 61,093 total admissions. For example, 60.4% of admissions were male, 52.5% were between ages 18-35, 69.3% were white, 38% reported alcohol as their primary substance, 60.4% had less than a high school education, 60.4% were unemployed, and 62.5% lived independently. The document also includes data on involvement with the criminal justice system, with 54.2% of admissions reporting some type of
The document provides admissions statistics for Nazarbayev University's Foundation Year Program from 2010 to 2015. It summarizes the number of applicants, exam takers meeting admission criteria, accepted students, and breakdowns of accepted students by academic program, entrance exam subjects, IELTS scores, regions of Kazakhstan, and gender each year. The number of applicants and admitted students generally increased over time, as did average entrance exam scores. The School of Engineering was the most popular program choice. Most students came from Astana, Almaty, and South Kazakhstan regions.
The document provides admissions statistics for Nazarbayev University Foundation Year Programme (NUFYP) from 2010 to 2017. It summarizes the number of applicants, exam takers who met admission criteria, and students accepted each year. It also breaks down admission numbers and test scores by gender, region of Kazakhstan, and NU school. The number of applicants and exam takers generally decreased from 2010 to 2017 while the number accepted fluctuated between 484 and 706.
The document provides admissions statistics for Nazarbayev University Foundation Year Programme (NUFYP) from 2010 to 2017. It summarizes the number of applicants, exam takers who met admission criteria, and students accepted each year. It also breaks down admission numbers and test scores by subject, region, gender, and NU school. The number of applicants and exam takers generally decreased from 2010 to 2017 while the number accepted fluctuated between 484 and 706. Engineering was the most popular school for admitted students throughout this period.
A public opinion survey was conducted in Tunisia from April 19-26, 2017 with 1,229 Tunisian respondents. The survey used a multi-stage stratified sampling method to select respondents proportionately from Tunisia's 24 governorates based on population data. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using tablets and the overall margin of error was +/- 2.85%. The survey addressed topics such as views on Tunisia's direction, the economy, priorities for government, and ratings of government performance.
The document provides sales trend data for NR/KRC from December 2014. It includes the following key points:
- Monthly sales have increased 52% year-over-year with stable contribution from organized retailers.
- Major retailers like Croma, Jumbo, and Ezone saw increased January sell-through of 20%, 37%, and 20% respectively by focusing on sell-through and maximizing Republic Day foot traffic.
- The payment issues with retailer TMS were addressed by stopping supplies to franchisees.
- Big C maintained a good share through the months with sell-through focus.
ICRISAT Global Planning Meeting 2019: Developing Resilient Dryland systems in...ICRISAT
Sustainable intensification is the most important pillar of the new paradigm. To ensure minimum degradation of natural resources while enhancing productivity and profitability, sustainable management and ecosystems services and various resources used in crop production are essential.
Given these figures, only 26.7% of the total participants have been trained while 69.8% have never been trained. 15 out of 24 (62.5%) who report education beat have never been trained on education reporting. 70.6 of those who report general beat have never been trained on education reporting. Thus, the relevance of JDP in equipping journalists with information cannot be over emphasized.
Descriptive statistics and analytics about human resources with in-depth look into turnover rate:
- annually / monthly
- among new hires
- among different types of employees (age groups, generation type, education, qualification etc.)
The Story of One City. Occupation and Liberation of SeverodonetskDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the occupation and liberation of Severodonetsk, Ukraine by pro-Russian separatist forces in 2014. It describes how separatists illegally seized voter rolls in April 2014 and held a sham referendum on May 11th declaring an independent "Lugansk People's Republic". During the occupation from May to July, the city faced shelling, food and water shortages, and lawlessness as separatists controlled checkpoints and detained and tortured civilians. Witnesses provided evidence of attacks on residential buildings and reports of rape and abuse. The Ukrainian military liberated Severodonetsk on July 22nd, ending the occupation.
More Related Content
Similar to Data from the second wave of the survey of the Kalmius group
Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine, April – May, 2017DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the methodology of a public opinion survey conducted in Ukraine from April 21 to May 5, 2017. It describes the sampling methodology, sample size, response rates, and funding source. An oversample was also conducted in Ukrainian-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts with 1,378 respondents. The survey aimed to be representative of the Ukrainian population by factors such as gender, age, region and settlement size.
This document provides sales performance data for various brands and products across different regions in India. It shows growth percentages for years 2019-2022 for general trade, modern trade and CNC channels. It also provides breakdown of sales by small cities and clusters within Karnataka and Kerala. Overall, the south region saw 15% growth in 2021 and 1% growth YTD 2022. Karnataka saw 16% growth in 2021 and 4% growth YTD, while Kerala saw 21% growth in 2021 and 1% growth YTD. Skin care, hair care and oral care products performed well across regions.
Predictions of decline made on 1.09.20 have not held.
There has been a spurt in deaths in the key states of Maharashtra, Karnataka and Delhi that is still continuing.
Punjab and UP are especially worrying
Very recent trends are again showing stability/decline in deaths
The document provides a baseline analysis of various villages surveyed by sample population. It includes details such as:
- Village wise population sample sizes ranging from 6 to 103 people surveyed per village totaling 667 people.
- Age and gender distribution showing majority are females aged below 15 years or between 15-21 years.
- Education levels showing majority have primary education with more females lacking education compared to males.
- Employment status showing over 40% are daily wage workers and 25% unemployed.
CommunicAsia 2022: Global IPv6 deployment - five years onAPNIC
APNIC Services Team Lead - South East Asia Anna Mulingbayan gives an update on global IPv6 deployment at CommunicAsia 2022 in Singapore from 1 to 3 June 2022.
The document provides population and economic statistics for an administrative region from 2009 to 2015. Some key points:
- The total population declined slightly from over 1 million in 2009 to just under 1 million in 2015, with the urban population remaining around 356,000-357,000.
- The number of employed increased from around 322,000 to over 366,000 while unemployment fell from 5.3% to 4.5%.
- The number of enterprises grew from 5,492 to over 6,300, with the majority being small and micro-sized. The industrial, wholesale, and transportation sectors employed the most people.
- Agricultural land was predominantly used for cereals and forage. Milk and dairy
- The SOHO Package was launched in October 2017 to target small businesses and is the only hybrid package that converts to prepaid after postpaid incentives are used.
- As of September 2018, 49,000 packages had been sold with an active customer base of 36,816. Most customers only remain active for 3 months or less.
- Revenue from the postpaid component totaled 22.6 million Pakistani rupees through September with an additional 7.7 million from prepaid usage. However, bill recovery is only around 75% with most customers not paying monthly bills.
Main Output Evaluation of National Leading Committte for Rural Development an...swgardlao
The document provides an evaluation of poverty and development in Lao PDR based on a nationwide survey conducted in early 2011. Key findings include:
- 198,678 families (18.86%) and 3,175 villages (36.69%) were found to be in poverty.
- 494,825 families (46.98%) and 883 villages (10.20%) met the criteria for development.
- Targets for 2011-2015 include reducing the poverty rate to under 19% of the population and 10% of households, and building over half of villages to developed status.
- Priority programs and activities for 2011-2012 focus on generating income for poor households, developing infrastructure and social services,
This document provides demographic data on substance abuse treatment admissions across various agencies in Michigan for fiscal year 2012. It includes information on gender, age, race/ethnicity, primary substance reported, education level, employment status, income, and living arrangements for 61,093 total admissions. For each agency, the percentages of clients in different demographic categories are shown, along with the total number of admissions for that agency. Statewide demographic percentages are also provided at the bottom.
This document provides demographic data on substance abuse treatment admissions across various agencies in Michigan for fiscal year 2012. It includes information on gender, age, race/ethnicity, primary substance reported, education level, employment status, income, and living arrangements for 61,093 total admissions. For example, 60.4% of admissions were male, 52.5% were between ages 18-35, 69.3% were white, 38% reported alcohol as their primary substance, 60.4% had less than a high school education, 60.4% were unemployed, and 62.5% lived independently. The document also includes data on involvement with the criminal justice system, with 54.2% of admissions reporting some type of
The document provides admissions statistics for Nazarbayev University's Foundation Year Program from 2010 to 2015. It summarizes the number of applicants, exam takers meeting admission criteria, accepted students, and breakdowns of accepted students by academic program, entrance exam subjects, IELTS scores, regions of Kazakhstan, and gender each year. The number of applicants and admitted students generally increased over time, as did average entrance exam scores. The School of Engineering was the most popular program choice. Most students came from Astana, Almaty, and South Kazakhstan regions.
The document provides admissions statistics for Nazarbayev University Foundation Year Programme (NUFYP) from 2010 to 2017. It summarizes the number of applicants, exam takers who met admission criteria, and students accepted each year. It also breaks down admission numbers and test scores by gender, region of Kazakhstan, and NU school. The number of applicants and exam takers generally decreased from 2010 to 2017 while the number accepted fluctuated between 484 and 706.
The document provides admissions statistics for Nazarbayev University Foundation Year Programme (NUFYP) from 2010 to 2017. It summarizes the number of applicants, exam takers who met admission criteria, and students accepted each year. It also breaks down admission numbers and test scores by subject, region, gender, and NU school. The number of applicants and exam takers generally decreased from 2010 to 2017 while the number accepted fluctuated between 484 and 706. Engineering was the most popular school for admitted students throughout this period.
A public opinion survey was conducted in Tunisia from April 19-26, 2017 with 1,229 Tunisian respondents. The survey used a multi-stage stratified sampling method to select respondents proportionately from Tunisia's 24 governorates based on population data. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using tablets and the overall margin of error was +/- 2.85%. The survey addressed topics such as views on Tunisia's direction, the economy, priorities for government, and ratings of government performance.
The document provides sales trend data for NR/KRC from December 2014. It includes the following key points:
- Monthly sales have increased 52% year-over-year with stable contribution from organized retailers.
- Major retailers like Croma, Jumbo, and Ezone saw increased January sell-through of 20%, 37%, and 20% respectively by focusing on sell-through and maximizing Republic Day foot traffic.
- The payment issues with retailer TMS were addressed by stopping supplies to franchisees.
- Big C maintained a good share through the months with sell-through focus.
ICRISAT Global Planning Meeting 2019: Developing Resilient Dryland systems in...ICRISAT
Sustainable intensification is the most important pillar of the new paradigm. To ensure minimum degradation of natural resources while enhancing productivity and profitability, sustainable management and ecosystems services and various resources used in crop production are essential.
Given these figures, only 26.7% of the total participants have been trained while 69.8% have never been trained. 15 out of 24 (62.5%) who report education beat have never been trained on education reporting. 70.6 of those who report general beat have never been trained on education reporting. Thus, the relevance of JDP in equipping journalists with information cannot be over emphasized.
Descriptive statistics and analytics about human resources with in-depth look into turnover rate:
- annually / monthly
- among new hires
- among different types of employees (age groups, generation type, education, qualification etc.)
Similar to Data from the second wave of the survey of the Kalmius group (20)
The Story of One City. Occupation and Liberation of SeverodonetskDonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the occupation and liberation of Severodonetsk, Ukraine by pro-Russian separatist forces in 2014. It describes how separatists illegally seized voter rolls in April 2014 and held a sham referendum on May 11th declaring an independent "Lugansk People's Republic". During the occupation from May to July, the city faced shelling, food and water shortages, and lawlessness as separatists controlled checkpoints and detained and tortured civilians. Witnesses provided evidence of attacks on residential buildings and reports of rape and abuse. The Ukrainian military liberated Severodonetsk on July 22nd, ending the occupation.
The document analyzes violations of electoral rights that occurred during elections in liberated territories of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in Ukraine. It describes violations during the 2014 extraordinary presidential and parliamentary elections, as well as the 2015 local elections, including obstacles to voting, violence against election officials, and criminal interference. The document highlights issues preventing internally displaced persons from exercising their right to vote and proposes solutions like allowing voters to change their voting address without changing their official place of residence, to integrate displaced people into their new communities while preserving electoral rights.
The document provides background information on Popasna, Ukraine and summarizes key events regarding its occupation and liberation during the 2014 conflict. It describes how Popasna came under the control of pro-Russian separatist forces in May 2014 but was liberated by Ukrainian troops on July 22, 2014. However, Popasna remained strategically important and faced repeated artillery attacks from separatists using Grads and other rocket launchers throughout the remainder of 2014, resulting in civilian casualties and property damage. The document lists numerous specific dates of artillery attacks on the city during this period.
The town of Mariinka has been at the center of conflict in eastern Ukraine since 2014. It has been repeatedly shelled by Russian-led forces, leading to numerous civilian casualties and widespread destruction of homes and infrastructure. Although a ceasefire was agreed to in Minsk, the shelling of Mariinka has continued on a near daily basis. As a result, many residents have been forced to evacuate while others live in difficult conditions, lacking basic services. Over four years of conflict, 41 residents have been killed according to official data. The constant shelling of civilian areas like Mariinka may constitute war crimes under international law.
Digest by Ukrainian Helsinki Human rights Union, April 2019DonbassFullAccess
The document summarizes the activities of the USAID Human Rights in Action Program implemented by the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union in April 2019. It discusses the program's work on human rights monitoring, advocacy, strategic litigation, free legal aid provision, and human rights education. Key events covered include Russia simplifying citizenship for eastern Ukrainians, and the PACE keeping sanctions on Russia in place.
We are pleased to share with you the latest VCOSA statistical report on the cotton and yarn industry for the month of May 2024.
Starting from January 2024, the full weekly and monthly reports will only be available for free to VCOSA members. To access the complete weekly report with figures, charts, and detailed analysis of the cotton fiber market in the past week, interested parties are kindly requested to contact VCOSA to subscribe to the newsletter.
Did you know that drowning is a leading cause of unintentional death among young children? According to recent data, children aged 1-4 years are at the highest risk. Let's raise awareness and take steps to prevent these tragic incidents. Supervision, barriers around pools, and learning CPR can make a difference. Stay safe this summer!
Open Source Contributions to Postgres: The Basics POSETTE 2024ElizabethGarrettChri
Postgres is the most advanced open-source database in the world and it's supported by a community, not a single company. So how does this work? How does code actually get into Postgres? I recently had a patch submitted and committed and I want to share what I learned in that process. I’ll give you an overview of Postgres versions and how the underlying project codebase functions. I’ll also show you the process for submitting a patch and getting that tested and committed.
Data from the second wave of the survey of the Kalmius group
1. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Options of humanitarian and trade relations
between Ukraine and uncontrolled
territories_Absence of any trade, provision
of services, processing of payments and
contacts (including movement of people)
1 Absolutely irrelevant 24,08 % 26,71 % 27,95 % 29,09 % 32,59 % 27,08 %
2 Somewhat irrelevant 28,55 % 26,69 % 29,65 % 31,83 % 28,21 % 28,62 %
3 Somewhat reasonable 20,14 % 20,43 % 20,00 % 18,36 % 19,80 % 19,85 %
4 Fully reasonable 17,76 % 15,83 % 13,86 % 12,78 % 9,80 % 15,06 %
(do not read out) DK 9,47 % 10,34 % 8,54 % 7,95 % 9,60 % 9,39 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Options of humanitarian and trade relations
between Ukraine and uncontrolled
territories_Economic blockade, prohibition
for payment of pensions and provision of
water and energy supply, but with movement
of people through the cross line as it is
currently organized
1 Absolutely irrelevant 25,31 % 26,92 % 33,87 % 33,49 % 38,02 % 29,39 %
2 Somewhat irrelevant 21,04 % 20,34 % 25,61 % 25,19 % 23,81 % 22,33 %
3 Somewhat reasonable 21,47 % 23,21 % 15,38 % 17,83 % 20,07 % 20,59 %
4 Fully reasonable 22,41 % 24,09 % 17,01 % 15,01 % 13,20 % 20,34 %
(do not read out) DK 9,76 % 5,44 % 8,13 % 8,49 % 4,90 % 7,36 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
32,59 %
28,21 %
19,80 %
9,80 %
9,60 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
38,02 %
23,81 %
20,07 %
13,20 %
4,90 %
100,00 %
The survey was conducted by GfK Ukraine. Survey method is telephone interviews with calls to phones. Survey period:
from May 3 to May 19, 2018. 1980 respondents, 528 of them from Donetsk and Luhansk regions (territories controlled by
the Ukrainian government). Weighted data for the total population (real sample of 1980 respondents) corresponds to the
population distribution by age/gender/settlement type and macro region according to State Statistics Service of Ukraine
data as of January 1, 2017; weighted data for the population of Donetska and Luhanska oblast corresponds with the
oblasts’ population distribution by age/gender/settlement type. The data in the tables is given as weighted, and the total
weighted sample of 1,500 respondents is displayed for convenience. The survey was conducted in all regions of Ukraine,
except for the uncontrolled part of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts and the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. The sampling
error for the whole of Ukraine does not exceed 2.5%, for Donetsk and Luhansk regions — does not exceed 4.9%
DATA FROM THE SECOND WAVE OF THE SURVEY
OF THE KALMIUS GROUP
I will read out the description of options of humanitarian and trade relations between Ukraine and uncontrolled territories.
Please, assess each of them with 4 point scale where 1 is absolutely irrelevant and 4 is fully reasonable now?
2. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Options of humanitarian and trade relations
between Ukraine and uncontrolled
territories_Economic blockade, but with
maintaining of humanitarian relations
(movement of people, payment of pensions,
water and energy supply)
1 Absolutely irrelevant 20,03 % 21,84 % 18,29 % 19,50 % 25,08 % 20,72 %
2 Somewhat irrelevant 18,92 % 22,09 % 27,13 % 19,86 % 20,28 % 21,38 %
3 Somewhat reasonable 24,45 % 21,31 % 20,48 % 22,95 % 24,87 % 22,50 %
4 Fully reasonable 31,28 % 28,07 % 25,89 % 29,41 % 24,42 % 28,61 %
(do not read out) DK 5,32 % 6,70 % 8,21 % 8,28 % 5,35 % 6,79 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Options of humanitarian and trade relations
between Ukraine and uncontrolled
territories_Permission to trade with essential
goods only (supply of food and products for
daily-use from controlled territory of
Ukraine)
1 Absolutely irrelevant 16,36 % 21,12 % 16,12 % 19,66 % 23,81 % 19,28 %
2 Somewhat irrelevant 14,99 % 15,00 % 16,95 % 19,53 % 17,42 % 16,29 %
3 Somewhat reasonable 22,92 % 25,84 % 20,73 % 24,26 % 22,63 % 24,03 %
4 Fully reasonable 40,00 % 32,45 % 38,77 % 30,57 % 30,94 % 34,50 %
(do not read out) DK 5,74 % 5,59 % 7,43 % 5,98 % 5,20 % 5,90 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Options of humanitarian and trade relations
between Ukraine and uncontrolled
territories_Permission to trade relations with
uncontrolled territories as much as
possible :
1 Absolutely irrelevant 38,08 % 32,62 % 25,09 % 27,62 % 28,44 % 31,74 %
2 Somewhat irrelevant 16,86 % 17,76 % 22,69 % 21,28 % 18,18 % 18,87 %
3 Somewhat reasonable 18,19 % 18,98 % 18,72 % 21,18 % 20,43 % 19,30 %
4 Fully reasonable 17,42 % 23,25 % 23,47 % 25,00 % 25,91 % 22,42 %
(do not read out) DK 9,45 % 7,39 % 10,03 % 4,92 % 7,05 % 7,67 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
25,08 %
20,28 %
24,87 %
24,42 %
5,35 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
23,81 %
17,42 %
22,63 %
30,94 %
5,20 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
28,44 %
18,18 %
20,43 %
25,91 %
7,05 %
100,00 %
3. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
With regard to the local authorities in non-
controlled Donbas, do you think they should
be appointed by Kyiv or elected by the local
population right after beginning of
reintegration process?
Should be appointed by Kyiv 42,30 % 37,49 % 23,40 % 30,34 % 20,78 % 34,46 %
Should be elected by the local population 48,49 % 53,47 % 68,18 % 61,85 % 69,36 % 56,73 %
Other 1,21 % 1,66 % 1,47 % 1,14 % 1,10 % 1,39 %
(do not read out) Don’t know 4,75 % 5,62 % 4,57 % 5,36 % 7,26 % 5,34 %
Other: Jointly (Kyiv and locals) 3,26 % 1,75 % 2,38 % 1,31 % 1,50 % 2,08 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
In case Ukraine restore the control over the
territories of Donbas that are non-controlled
now, who should appoint municipal police in
NGCA?
Special status should be granted to Donbas and
police should be appointed by local authorities 11,79 % 10,91 % 20,75 % 15,40 % 27,16 % 14,20 %
Kyiv authorities as it is organized in all Ukraine 51,88 % 51,92 % 46,83 % 44,07 % 32,72 % 48,53 %
Managing staff is to be appointed by Kyiv while
local authorities decide about middle and low
level staff
31,07 % 31,89 % 28,57 % 35,92 % 33,83 % 32,24 %
(do not read out) Refuse 0,25 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,79 % 0,11 %
(do not read out) DK 5,01 % 5,28 % 3,84 % 4,61 % 5,49 % 4,92 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
In case Ukraine restore the control over the
territories of Donbas that are non-controlled
now, who should appoint judicial bodies in
NGCA?
Special status should be granted to Donbas and
judicial bodies should be appointed by local authorities 9,56 % 10,90 % 14,21 % 15,08 % 24,63 % 12,68 %
Kyiv authorities as it is organized in all Ukraine 59,14 % 57,93 % 46,80 % 50,14 % 39,77 % 54,19 %
Managing staff is to be appointed by Kyiv while
local authorities decide about middle and low level staff 26,96 % 24,75 % 31,82 % 28,33 % 28,99 % 27,10 %
(do not read out) Refuse 0,31 % 0,15 % 0,25 % 0,00 % 0,55 % 0,19 %
(do not read out) DK 4,04 % 6,27 % 6,93 % 6,46 % 6,07 % 5,85 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
27,16 %
32,72 %
33,83 %
0,79 %
5,49 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
24,63 %
39,77 %
28,99 %
0,55 %
6,07 %
100,00 %
4. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
People in non-controlled Donbas who work
in the following spheres should be allowed
to keep their positions in case of Ukraine’s
restoration over that territory_Healthcare
specialists and doctors of middle- and
lower- level :
1 Strongly disagree 1,69 % 2,98 % 2,54 % 1,71 % 3,10 % 2,38 %
2 Somewhat disagree 4,35 % 3,56 % 1,95 % 2,83 % 2,99 % 3,37 %
3 Somewhat agree 26,62 % 25,67 % 18,84 % 21,55 % 22,34 % 24,04 %
4 Strongly agree 65,64 % 65,59 % 75,10 % 73,67 % 70,02 % 68,64 %
(do not read out) DK 1,71 % 2,20 % 1,56 % 0,23 % 1,56 % 1,57 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
People in non-controlled Donbas who work
in the following spheres should be allowed
to keep their positions in case of Ukraine’s
restoration over that territory_Healthcare
specialists and doctors of top-managing
level :
1 Strongly disagree 9,11 % 11,27 % 7,32 % 8,68 % 8,91 % 9,62 %
2 Somewhat disagree 14,15 % 13,57 % 7,74 % 11,22 % 10,92 % 12,37 %
3 Somewhat agree 27,51 % 27,76 % 30,00 % 28,44 % 25,81 % 27,99 %
4 Strongly agree 43,75 % 43,26 % 52,62 % 46,70 % 49,14 % 45,55 %
(do not read out) DK 5,48 % 4,14 % 2,31 % 4,95 % 5,22 % 4,47 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
People in non-controlled Donbas who work
in the following spheres should be allowed
to keep their positions in case of Ukraine’s
restoration over that territory_Teachers,
middle- and lower- level specialists of
education sphere :
1 Strongly disagree 9,59 % 10,62 % 7,19 % 6,97 % 8,00 % 9,07 %
2 Somewhat disagree 12,36 % 11,87 % 4,63 % 5,88 % 8,65 % 9,71 %
3 Somewhat agree 28,06 % 25,60 % 27,09 % 25,07 % 22,41 % 26,05 %
4 Strongly agree 45,90 % 48,43 % 58,88 % 59,55 % 58,59 % 51,96 %
(do not read out) DK 4,09 % 3,48 % 2,21 % 2,53 % 2,35 % 3,21 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Overall, to what extent do you agree or disagree that people in non-controlled Donbas who work in the following spheres should be allowed
to keep their positions in case of Ukraine’s restoration over that territory?
Donbas
Col%
3,10 %
2,99 %
22,34 %
70,02 %
1,56 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
8,91 %
10,92 %
25,81 %
49,14 %
5,22 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
8,00 %
8,65 %
22,41 %
58,59 %
2,35 %
100,00 %
5. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
People in non-controlled Donbas who work
in the following spheres should be allowed
to keep their positions in case of Ukraine’s
restoration over that territory_Education
sphere specialists of top-managing level :
1 Strongly disagree 19,76 % 21,72 % 10,92 % 14,45 % 15,32 % 18,11 %
2 Somewhat disagree 17,68 % 20,33 % 13,48 % 19,94 % 13,13 % 18,37 %
3 Somewhat agree 24,35 % 24,58 % 27,18 % 24,76 % 21,27 % 24,66 %
4 Strongly agree 31,03 % 29,78 % 43,68 % 36,25 % 44,91 % 33,97 %
(do not read out) DK 7,18 % 3,60 % 4,74 % 4,60 % 5,37 % 4,89 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
People in non-controlled Donbas who work
in the following spheres should be allowed
to keep their positions in case of Ukraine’s
restoration over that territory_Middle- and
lower- level specialists of social protection
system :
1 Strongly disagree 5,63 % 8,70 % 7,11 % 7,18 % 6,55 % 7,35 %
2 Somewhat disagree 17,01 % 11,60 % 8,25 % 8,76 % 9,32 % 11,76 %
3 Somewhat agree 35,51 % 30,35 % 32,72 % 31,81 % 30,36 % 32,14 %
4 Strongly agree 37,78 % 42,28 % 48,10 % 47,52 % 49,11 % 43,40 %
(do not read out) DK 4,07 % 7,07 % 3,83 % 4,74 % 4,65 % 5,36 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
People in non-controlled Donbas who work
in the following spheres should be allowed
to keep their positions in case of Ukraine’s
restoration over that territory_Top-managing
level specialists of social protection
system :
1 Strongly disagree 18,36 % 22,82 % 14,03 % 16,46 % 14,88 % 18,95 %
2 Somewhat disagree 22,00 % 17,38 % 13,76 % 18,20 % 15,43 % 18,08 %
3 Somewhat agree 26,17 % 27,77 % 32,45 % 30,42 % 27,92 % 28,50 %
4 Strongly agree 28,03 % 26,03 % 37,22 % 28,92 % 36,91 % 29,09 %
(do not read out) DK 5,44 % 6,00 % 2,55 % 5,99 % 4,87 % 5,39 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
People in non-controlled Donbas who work
in the following spheres should be allowed
to keep their positions in case of Ukraine’s
restoration over that territory_Middle- and
lower- level specialists of public utilities
sphere :
1 Strongly disagree 6,34 % 8,68 % 7,25 % 6,79 % 8,68 % 7,58 %
2 Somewhat disagree 13,00 % 9,61 % 13,27 % 9,45 % 7,61 % 10,69 %
3 Somewhat agree 35,91 % 32,99 % 29,89 % 31,58 % 28,67 % 32,76 %
4 Strongly agree 42,60 % 44,48 % 46,87 % 48,74 % 51,89 % 45,64 %
(do not read out) DK 2,15 % 4,24 % 2,72 % 3,43 % 3,14 % 3,33 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
15,32 %
13,13 %
21,27 %
44,91 %
5,37 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
6,55 %
9,32 %
30,36 %
49,11 %
4,65 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
14,88 %
15,43 %
27,92 %
36,91 %
4,87 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
8,68 %
7,61 %
28,67 %
51,89 %
3,14 %
100,00 %
6. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
People in non-controlled Donbas who work
in the following spheres should be allowed
to keep their positions in case of Ukraine’s
restoration over that territory_Top-managing
level specialists of public utilities sphere :
1 Strongly disagree 16,10 % 19,35 % 13,46 % 18,64 % 16,87 % 17,59 %
2 Somewhat disagree 21,15 % 18,08 % 19,94 % 17,36 % 13,21 % 18,57 %
3 Somewhat agree 32,37 % 29,86 % 29,56 % 30,13 % 29,04 % 30,42 %
4 Strongly agree 25,79 % 30,36 % 33,87 % 30,08 % 36,70 % 30,04 %
(do not read out) DK 4,60 % 2,35 % 3,16 % 3,79 % 4,18 % 3,38 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
People in non-controlled Donbas who work
in the following spheres should be allowed
to keep their positions in case of Ukraine’s
restoration over that territory_Middle- and
lower-level specialists of authorities of self-
proclaimed republics :
1 Strongly disagree 68,01 % 57,75 % 43,66 % 49,39 % 41,76 % 55,81 %
2 Somewhat disagree 12,29 % 17,95 % 21,92 % 19,79 % 17,79 % 17,45 %
3 Somewhat agree 7,83 % 8,50 % 11,89 % 11,69 % 14,27 % 9,75 %
4 Strongly agree 8,02 % 11,67 % 14,94 % 10,88 % 14,65 % 11,22 %
(do not read out) DK 3,85 % 4,14 % 7,60 % 8,25 % 11,52 % 5,77 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
People in non-controlled Donbas who work
in the following spheres should be allowed
to keep their positions in case of Ukraine’s
restoration over that territory_Top-managing
level specialists of authorities of self-
proclaimed republics :
1 Strongly disagree 74,18 % 64,51 % 46,42 % 55,93 % 46,83 % 61,80 %
2 Somewhat disagree 10,91 % 15,04 % 18,52 % 19,37 % 18,39 % 15,57 %
3 Somewhat agree 5,93 % 5,90 % 14,84 % 9,47 % 11,73 % 8,05 %
4 Strongly agree 5,61 % 9,17 % 13,32 % 9,52 % 12,68 % 9,12 %
(do not read out) DK 3,36 % 5,37 % 6,91 % 5,71 % 10,37 % 5,46 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
16,87 %
13,21 %
29,04 %
36,70 %
4,18 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
41,76 %
17,79 %
14,27 %
14,65 %
11,52 %
100,00 %
11,73 %
18,39 %
46,83 %
Col%
Donbas
12,68 %
10,37 %
100,00 %
7. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Please, assess your attitude
towards_Privileges for children coming from
NGCA when entering the university in
controlled territory :
1 Fully reject 7,29 % 7,84 % 7,83 % 8,16 % 6,33 % 7,68 %
2 Rather reject 7,27 % 8,72 % 5,65 % 13,00 % 5,75 % 8,70 %
3 Rather approve 31,92 % 28,04 % 31,77 % 24,39 % 22,42 % 28,31 %
4 Fully approve 52,05 % 54,17 % 54,19 % 52,49 % 64,11 % 53,95 %
(do not read out) DK 1,47 % 1,23 % 0,56 % 1,95 % 1,39 % 1,36 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Please, assess your attitude
towards_Privilegesfor children of IDPs when
entering the university in controlled
territory :
1 Fully reject 3,87 % 6,18 % 5,00 % 5,57 % 5,40 % 5,32 %
2 Rather reject 9,19 % 8,59 % 5,32 % 8,87 % 4,80 % 8,17 %
3 Rather approve 31,83 % 27,21 % 31,84 % 28,86 % 24,97 % 29,04 %
4 Fully approve 53,15 % 55,94 % 56,38 % 55,15 % 63,52 % 55,65 %
(do not read out) DK 1,96 % 2,07 % 1,46 % 1,55 % 1,32 % 1,82 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Please, assess your attitude
towards_Subsidies for IDPs who establish
small enterprise in the host community
1 Fully reject 3,80 % 5,61 % 5,97 % 3,82 % 3,82 % 4,75 %
2 Rather reject 12,29 % 9,91 % 9,02 % 9,42 % 5,70 % 10,00 %
3 Rather approve 42,68 % 38,64 % 35,05 % 42,30 % 34,74 % 39,66 %
4 Fully approve 39,07 % 42,19 % 45,76 % 41,74 % 52,65 % 42,43 %
(do not read out) DK 2,16 % 3,66 % 4,20 % 2,73 % 3,10 % 3,15 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Please, assess your attitude towards_Giving
IDPs the right to vote on local elections in
their host community :
1 Fully reject 7,28 % 4,89 % 4,58 % 5,55 % 4,68 % 5,54 %
2 Rather reject 9,37 % 7,19 % 5,70 % 7,52 % 6,25 % 7,54 %
3 Rather approve 31,76 % 34,39 % 32,41 % 25,34 % 23,43 % 31,02 %
4 Fully approve 48,39 % 51,86 % 55,66 % 59,18 % 62,56 % 53,64 %
(do not read out) DK 3,20 % 1,67 % 1,65 % 2,40 % 3,08 % 2,26 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Please, assess your attitude towards each of the hypothetical or existing measures with 4-point scale where 1 is complete rejection and 4 is full approval
Donbas
Col%
6,33 %
5,75 %
22,42 %
64,11 %
1,39 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
5,40 %
4,80 %
24,97 %
63,52 %
1,32 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
3,82 %
5,70 %
34,74 %
52,65 %
3,10 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
4,68 %
6,25 %
23,43 %
62,56 %
3,08 %
100,00 %
8. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
It supports or rejects reintegration of
Donbas_All-Ukraine Union
"Batkivshchina" (Yulia Tymoshenko)
Supports reintegration 46,77 % 47,49 % 44,45 % 47,35 % 34,99 % 46,15 %
Rejects reintegration 17,34 % 15,66 % 21,59 % 17,32 % 29,41 % 17,95 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 2,00 % 3,27 % 4,17 % 4,10 % 2,66 % 3,21 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 33,89 % 33,58 % 29,78 % 31,24 % 32,94 % 32,69 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
It supports or rejects reintegration of
Donbas_Petro Poroshenko Bloc
"Solidarity" (Vitalii Klytchko, Igor Grin v) :
Supports reintegration 57,16 % 49,32 % 48,77 % 40,82 % 41,06 % 48,86 %
Rejects reintegration 13,86 % 15,68 % 22,17 % 23,64 % 27,18 % 18,35 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 0,73 % 2,95 % 4,60 % 4,97 % 3,04 % 3,04 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 28,26 % 32,05 % 24,47 % 30,58 % 28,72 % 29,75 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
It supports or rejects reintegration of
Donbas_Party "Opposition Bloc" (Y. Boiko) :
Supports reintegration 33,25 % 37,25 % 40,02 % 43,98 % 47,37 % 38,63 %
Rejects reintegration 24,99 % 17,75 % 19,55 % 14,87 % 17,37 % 19,06 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 7,66 % 7,97 % 11,41 % 11,26 % 8,58 % 9,01 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 34,11 % 37,03 % 29,02 % 29,89 % 26,68 % 33,30 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
It supports or rejects reintegration of
Donbas_Party "Samopomich" (A. Sadovyi) :
Supports reintegration 48,30 % 37,54 % 31,30 % 29,99 % 27,80 % 37,20 %
Rejects reintegration 16,42 % 13,81 % 16,15 % 18,21 % 19,96 % 15,98 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 4,25 % 8,63 % 14,16 % 14,24 % 19,42 % 10,06 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 31,03 % 40,02 % 38,38 % 37,55 % 32,82 % 36,76 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
I will read the list of political parties – please, tell me, basing on information available to you about each party, it supports or rejects reintegration of Donbas?
Donbas
Col%
34,99 %
29,41 %
2,66 %
32,94 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
41,06 %
27,18 %
3,04 %
28,72 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
47,37 %
17,37 %
8,58 %
26,68 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
27,80 %
19,96 %
19,42 %
32,82 %
100,00 %
9. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
It supports or rejects reintegration of
Donbas_"Radical Party of Oleh
Lyashko" (Oleh Lyashko) :
Supports reintegration 42,90 % 39,91 % 42,83 % 39,50 % 39,86 % 40,87 %
Rejects reintegration 21,47 % 20,25 % 25,13 % 22,30 % 24,10 % 21,77 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 0,96 % 2,69 % 3,70 % 5,09 % 2,82 % 2,90 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 34,67 % 37,16 % 28,34 % 33,11 % 33,22 % 34,46 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
It supports or rejects reintegration of
Donbas_Party "Civil Position" (Anatoliy
Hrytsenko) :
Supports reintegration 40,51 % 39,25 % 25,61 % 34,36 % 27,89 % 36,23 %
Rejects reintegration 12,92 % 12,28 % 20,12 % 12,05 % 15,30 % 13,51 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 9,47 % 14,28 % 16,29 % 19,17 % 29,24 % 15,31 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 37,10 % 34,19 % 37,98 % 34,41 % 27,57 % 34,96 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
It supports or rejects reintegration of
Donbas_Party "For Life" (Vadim Rabinovich,
Evgeniy Muraev) :
Supports reintegration 29,38 % 27,70 % 33,01 % 37,95 % 36,64 % 31,36 %
Rejects reintegration 19,04 % 17,71 % 18,28 % 13,17 % 14,89 % 16,99 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 16,38 % 17,71 % 14,28 % 17,03 % 23,79 % 17,23 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 35,20 % 36,88 % 34,43 % 31,85 % 24,68 % 34,42 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
It supports or rejects reintegration of
Donbas_Party "Nash Kray" (Oleksandr
Mazurchak, Oleksandr Feldman) :
Supports reintegration 16,20 % 17,82 % 17,47 % 23,00 % 23,54 % 18,80 %
Rejects reintegration 12,54 % 10,48 % 8,40 % 11,19 % 10,21 % 10,84 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 36,46 % 35,79 % 34,34 % 34,61 % 39,01 % 35,74 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 34,80 % 35,91 % 39,79 % 31,21 % 27,23 % 34,62 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
39,86 %
24,10 %
2,82 %
33,22 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
27,89 %
15,30 %
29,24 %
27,57 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
36,64 %
14,89 %
23,79 %
24,68 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
23,54 %
10,21 %
39,01 %
27,23 %
100,00 %
10. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
t supports or rejects reintegration of
Donbas_Party “Vidrodzhennya” (Viktor
Bondar, Vitaliy Homytynnyk) :
Supports reintegration 26,29 % 20,71 % 16,64 % 24,78 % 16,11 % 22,08 %
Rejects reintegration 16,11 % 11,45 % 12,11 % 9,20 % 13,45 % 12,29 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 19,89 % 29,17 % 33,16 % 27,23 % 46,34 % 28,13 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 37,72 % 38,66 % 38,10 % 38,80 % 24,09 % 37,50 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
It supports or rejects reintegration of
Donbas_Rukh Novyk Syl (Mikail Saakashvili,
David Sakvarelidze) :
Supports reintegration 27,82 % 26,86 % 19,09 % 25,86 % 19,18 % 25,48 %
Rejects reintegration 18,60 % 20,75 % 26,04 % 20,79 % 25,43 % 21,17 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 9,66 % 11,91 % 11,89 % 16,30 % 17,62 % 12,62 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 43,93 % 40,48 % 42,98 % 37,05 % 37,78 % 40,73 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
This person supports or rejects reintegration
of Donbas_President Petro Poroshenko :
Supports reintegration 66,18 % 60,48 % 55,07 % 53,94 % 51,84 % 59,32 %
Rejects reintegration 11,32 % 12,67 % 22,08 % 21,00 % 24,49 % 15,89 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 0,67 % 2,00 % 1,09 % 3,19 % 0,74 % 1,74 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 21,83 % 24,85 % 21,77 % 21,87 % 22,93 % 23,05 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
This person supports or rejects reintegration
of Donbas_Prime Minister Volodymyr
Groysman :
Supports reintegration 64,82 % 55,03 % 56,43 % 53,99 % 52,24 % 57,12 %
Rejects reintegration 9,97 % 13,80 % 17,42 % 17,59 % 20,82 % 14,53 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 1,64 % 2,59 % 3,09 % 4,05 % 2,37 % 2,71 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 23,57 % 28,58 % 23,06 % 24,37 % 24,57 % 25,64 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
And what about individual politicians? I will read you the names, please, tell me whether this person supports or rejects reintegration of Donbas.
Donbas
Col%
16,11 %
13,45 %
46,34 %
24,09 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
19,18 %
25,43 %
17,62 %
37,78 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
51,84 %
24,49 %
0,74 %
22,93 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
52,24 %
20,82 %
2,37 %
24,57 %
100,00 %
11. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
This person supports or rejects reintegration
of Donbas_Minister of Internal Affairs Arsen
Avakov :
Supports reintegration 53,76 % 42,90 % 42,38 % 42,07 % 40,74 % 45,09 %
Rejects reintegration 14,98 % 18,62 % 20,72 % 24,23 % 25,44 % 19,57 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 0,55 % 3,97 % 6,13 % 3,91 % 1,95 % 3,29 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 30,71 % 34,50 % 30,77 % 29,80 % 31,87 % 32,05 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
This person supports or rejects reintegration
of Donbas_Minister for TOT and IDPs Vadym
Chernysh :
Supports reintegration 42,79 % 39,99 % 34,58 % 35,35 % 30,91 % 38,50 %
Rejects reintegration 9,39 % 10,38 % 8,59 % 11,46 % 8,93 % 10,06 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 22,20 % 23,41 % 25,73 % 29,13 % 38,54 % 25,50 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 25,62 % 26,22 % 31,10 % 24,06 % 21,61 % 25,94 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
This person supports or rejects
reintegration of Donbas_Head of the
People’s Front Arseniy Yatsenyuk :
Supports reintegration 47,60 % 44,76 % 39,75 % 38,45 % 32,40 % 42,79 %
Rejects reintegration 18,84 % 17,88 % 24,15 % 26,99 % 31,84 % 21,56 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 0,88 % 3,44 % 1,09 % 3,41 % 2,92 % 2,52 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 32,68 % 33,91 % 35,02 % 31,15 % 32,84 % 33,13 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
This person supports or rejects reintegration
of Donbas_Defense Minister Stepan Poltorak:
Supports reintegration 53,85 % 45,39 % 41,89 % 45,12 % 39,59 % 46,55 %
Rejects reintegration 10,89 % 15,29 % 19,12 % 17,76 % 20,72 % 15,55 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 3,93 % 7,35 % 8,15 % 9,69 % 11,07 % 7,34 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 31,32 % 31,97 % 30,85 % 27,42 % 28,62 % 30,56 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
40,74 %
25,44 %
1,95 %
31,87 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
30,91 %
8,93 %
38,54 %
21,61 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
32,40 %
31,84 %
2,92 %
32,84 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
39,59 %
20,72 %
11,07 %
28,62 %
100,00 %
12. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
This person supports or rejects reintegration
of Donbas_Chairman of Parliament Andriy
Parubiy :
Supports reintegration 60,69 % 51,30 % 40,35 % 44,02 % 39,79 % 50,02 %
Rejects reintegration 11,69 % 15,42 % 23,76 % 21,64 % 26,11 % 17,45 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 1,02 % 2,75 % 6,96 % 5,44 % 5,27 % 3,54 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 26,61 % 30,54 % 28,93 % 28,90 % 28,82 % 28,98 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
This person supports or rejects reintegration
of Donbas_The leader of the party
"Batkyvshchyna" Yuliia Tymoshenko :
Supports reintegration 52,91 % 53,31 % 52,65 % 51,29 % 39,72 % 51,88 %
Rejects reintegration 14,05 % 13,05 % 19,53 % 17,78 % 28,65 % 15,98 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 1,01 % 2,22 % 1,09 % 3,17 % 0,77 % 1,90 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 32,03 % 31,42 % 26,73 % 27,76 % 30,86 % 30,23 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
This person supports or rejects
reintegration of Donbas_The leader of the
Radical party Oleh Liashko :
Supports reintegration 53,20 % 45,40 % 42,90 % 45,98 % 44,29 % 46,99 %
Rejects reintegration 19,48 % 20,21 % 27,38 % 22,96 % 25,01 % 21,75 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 0,16 % 2,38 % 2,26 % 3,16 % 1,61 % 1,95 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 27,15 % 32,00 % 27,46 % 27,90 % 29,10 % 29,31 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
This person supports or rejects reintegration
of Donbas_The leader of the Opposition
Bloc Yuryi Boiko :
Supports reintegration 39,18 % 39,90 % 43,86 % 51,28 % 49,58 % 43,10 %
Rejects reintegration 22,44 % 20,78 % 18,18 % 14,60 % 16,38 % 19,34 %
(do not read out) I don’t know such party 4,08 % 5,44 % 7,40 % 6,23 % 5,53 % 5,52 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 34,30 % 33,88 % 30,55 % 27,89 % 28,51 % 32,04 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
39,79 %
26,11 %
5,27 %
28,82 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
39,72 %
28,65 %
0,77 %
30,86 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
44,29 %
25,01 %
1,61 %
29,10 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
49,58 %
16,38 %
5,53 %
28,51 %
100,00 %
13. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
In winter 2018, Ukrainian government
approved the “Law on Reintegration of the
Donbas”. Have you heard about this law?
Yes 58,33 % 60,17 % 47,89 % 57,87 % 66,08 % 58,18 %
No 39,85 % 39,11 % 50,32 % 40,82 % 33,00 % 40,58 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 1,82 % 0,72 % 1,79 % 1,31 % 0,93 % 1,24 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Do you have enough or need more
information about this Law?
need more information 59,45 % 57,58 % 63,10 % 59,19 % 62,03 % 59,20 %
have enough information 32,72 % 30,02 % 25,18 % 33,29 % 28,62 % 30,75 %
I’m not interested in this law 5,12 % 6,65 % 4,89 % 2,81 % 6,76 % 5,35 %
(do not read out) Hard to say 2,71 % 5,74 % 6,82 % 4,71 % 2,59 % 4,70 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Please, assess your approval or rejection of
this Law using 4-point scale
1 Completely reject 3,13 % 5,48 % 1,60 % 5,44 % 10,50 % 4,89 %
2 Rather reject 14,04 % 11,84 % 18,19 % 14,25 % 16,33 % 13,80 %
3 Rather approve 47,03 % 44,98 % 43,89 % 43,85 % 39,54 % 44,75 %
4 Fully approve 22,05 % 22,91 % 24,31 % 21,74 % 21,72 % 22,51 %
(do not read out) Refuse 1,34 % 0,28 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,43 %
(do not read out) DK 12,41 % 14,52 % 12,01 % 14,72 % 11,91 % 13,62 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
To what extent are you familiar with the
activity of Ukraine’s Ministry on the Matters
of Temporarily Occupied Territories and
IDPs?
I don’t know what is it 21,10 % 25,72 % 30,15 % 28,50 % 24,10 % 25,62 %
I know that it exists, but I know nothing about its 39,24 % 39,80 % 35,74 % 41,87 % 35,91 % 39,36 %
I know about its activity in general, but need
more information 37,31 % 31,07 % 32,04 % 24,97 % 35,32 % 31,68 %
I know enough about its activity 1,87 % 2,70 % 0,83 % 4,65 % 4,09 % 2,77 %
Other (specify) 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 %
(do not read) DK 0,25 % 0,71 % 1,24 % 0,00 % 0,36 % 0,50 %
(do not read) Refused 0,22 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,21 % 0,06 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
66,08 %
33,00 %
0,93 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
62,03 %
28,62 %
6,76 %
2,59 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
10,50 %
16,33 %
39,54 %
21,72 %
0,00 %
11,91 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
24,10 %
35,91 %
35,32 %
4,09 %
0,00 %
0,36 %
0,21 %
100,00 %
(% among those, who have heard about this law)
(% among those, who have heard about this law,
and determined with the capacity of information
they needed)
14. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
What in your opinion are the main
directions of activity of Ukraine’s Ministry on
the Matters of Temporarily Occupied
Territories and IDPs?
Reintegration of occupied territories 7,77 % 11,96 % 15,34 % 11,69 % 7,01 % 10,83 %
Finding the ways to stop the conflict in Donbas 10,92 % 5,49 % 5,95 % 4,26 % 4,44 % 6,71 %
Integration of IDPs in other regions of Ukraine 27,49 % 18,21 % 19,85 % 18,87 % 19,60 % 21,09 %
Communication and regulation of relations with
citizens who live in NGCAs: judicial,
psychological social services, education,
17,67 % 10,60 % 6,20 % 7,94 % 8,52 % 11,38 %
Humanitarian aid to citizens who live in NGCAs 18,63 % 17,66 % 14,54 % 12,68 % 9,57 % 16,12 %
Cultural issues: saving and renewal of Ukrainian
culture in NGCAs 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 %
Renewal of the Ukrainian media broadcasting in NGCAs 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,53 % 0,04 %
Regulation of Ukrainian enterprises functioning in NGCAs 0,78 % 0,67 % 1,36 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,61 %
Regulation of processes of crossing the line 2,62 % 1,10 % 0,00 % 5,65 % 4,43 % 2,41 %
Protection of children living in NGCAs 2,61 % 3,51 % 0,00 % 2,79 % 3,19 % 2,73 %
Other (specify) 6,72 % 7,21 % 8,05 % 3,67 % 12,15 % 6,91 %
(do not read) DK 31,67 % 39,19 % 22,71 % 35,61 % 36,66 % 34,51 %
(do not read) Refused 0,00 % 1,65 % 2,24 % 2,40 % 0,47 % 1,32 %
Other: Corruption (stealing money) 3,64 % 3,45 % 6,22 % 3,66 % 3,38 % 3,85 %
Other: Do nothing/almost nothing 8,55 % 10,76 % 21,86 % 13,73 % 12,26 % 12,05 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
How would you assess the work of this
Ministry with regard to reintegration of
Donbas?
1 very bad 15,79 % 14,47 % 19,38 % 19,53 % 29,59 % 17,33 %
2 15,65 % 16,41 % 31,15 % 22,02 % 16,66 % 18,87 %
3 44,84 % 44,17 % 29,58 % 40,85 % 37,36 % 41,64 %
4 10,40 % 11,39 % 7,93 % 6,62 % 6,41 % 9,55 %
5 excellent 3,22 % 4,15 % 4,43 % 4,05 % 4,52 % 3,94 %
(do not read out) DK 10,09 % 9,42 % 7,53 % 6,93 % 5,46 % 8,67 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
7,01 %
4,44 %
19,60 %
8,52 %
9,57 %
0,00 %
0,53 %
0,00 %
4,43 %
3,19 %
12,15 %
36,66 %
0,47 %
3,38 %
12,26 %
100,00 %
100,00 %
5,46 %
4,52 %
6,41 %
37,36 %
16,66 %
29,59 %
Col%
Donbas
(% among those, who have heard about activities
of this Ministry)
(% among those, who have heard about activities
of this Ministry)
15. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
I will read out the list of information
sources, please, name up to three that you
use most often to learn about NGCA
TV 73,48 % 71,18 % 69,96 % 66,73 % 56,17 % 69,74 %
Internet sites 34,95 % 33,51 % 38,48 % 36,06 % 38,10 % 35,24 %
Social networking sites (VK, Facebook etc.) 32,22 % 31,59 % 26,27 % 26,24 % 22,63 % 29,47 %
Printed media 15,11 % 12,00 % 9,68 % 7,91 % 6,80 % 11,30 %
Radio 21,06 % 20,19 % 16,98 % 14,09 % 11,62 % 18,25 %
Your own friends and relatives who reside in NGCA 10,91 % 18,88 % 16,19 % 19,84 % 36,73 % 17,99 %
Your own acquaintance who reside in NGCA 6,89 % 11,86 % 11,53 % 18,09 % 23,59 % 12,64 %
IDPs in your community whose relatives, friends
or acquaintance reside in NGCA 6,55 % 10,63 % 10,48 % 13,02 % 16,03 % 10,47 %
(do not read out) I'm not interested in this information 2,91 % 2,56 % 3,15 % 2,01 % 5,49 % 2,78 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
You named TV - is it mostly Ukrainian,
Russian or NGCA sources?
Ukrainian 94,45 % 98,32 % 94,86 % 92,65 % 85,04 % 95,19 %
Russian 0,86 % 0,48 % 1,55 % 3,74 % 6,71 % 1,65 %
Souces from self-proclaimed ‘DPR’ and ‘LPR’ 0,57 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 1,13 % 0,20 %
(do not read out) DK 4,12 % 1,19 % 3,59 % 3,61 % 7,13 % 2,97 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
You named Internet sites - is it mostly
Ukrainian, Russian or NGCA sources?
Ukrainian 87,69 % 86,66 % 71,08 % 77,58 % 64,96 % 81,54 %
Russian 2,86 % 3,01 % 8,02 % 2,78 % 12,91 % 4,24 %
Souces from self-proclaimed ‘DPR’ and ‘LPR’ 2,05 % 0,86 % 1,74 % 2,52 % 2,57 % 1,71 %
(do not read out) DK 7,40 % 9,48 % 19,17 % 17,11 % 19,57 % 12,51 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
56,17 %
38,10 %
22,63 %
6,80 %
11,62 %
36,73 %
23,59 %
16,03 %
5,49 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
85,04 %
6,71 %
1,13 %
7,13 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
64,96 %
12,91 %
2,57 %
19,57 %
100,00 %
16. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
You named Social networking sites (VK,
Facebook etc.) - is it mostly Ukrainian,
Russian or NGCA sources?
Ukrainian 81,22 % 78,98 % 67,57 % 71,38 % 62,04 % 76,17 %
Russian 11,10 % 8,41 % 10,96 % 16,11 % 20,23 % 11,32 %
Souces from self-proclaimed ‘DPR’ and ‘LPR’ 2,22 % 0,93 % 5,23 % 3,95 % 3,37 % 2,38 %
(do not read out) DK 5,47 % 11,68 % 16,25 % 8,56 % 14,36 % 10,13 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
You named Printed media - is it mostly
Ukrainian, Russian or NGCA sources?
Ukrainian 98,40 % 95,84 % 91,77 % 100,00 % 88,55 % 96,55 %
Russian 0,00 % 1,73 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 2,86 % 0,81 %
Souces from self-proclaimed ‘DPR’ and ‘LPR’ 1,60 % 1,29 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 5,73 % 1,24 %
(do not read out) DK 0,00 % 1,14 % 8,23 % 0,00 % 2,86 % 1,40 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
You named Radio - is it mostly Ukrainian,
Russian or NGCA sources?
Ukrainian 100,00 % 97,50 % 97,84 % 97,24 % 84,16 % 97,65 %
Russian 0,00 % 1,75 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 3,56 % 0,88 %
Souces from self-proclaimed ‘DPR’ and ‘LPR’ 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 6,75 % 0,27 %
(do not read out) DK 0,00 % 0,75 % 2,16 % 2,76 % 5,52 % 1,21 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
62,04 %
20,23 %
3,37 %
14,36 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
88,55 %
2,86 %
5,73 %
2,86 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
84,16 %
3,56 %
6,75 %
5,52 %
100,00 %
17. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Out of these sources of information about
NGCA, which one do you think is the most
credible
Ukrainian TV 33,32 % 33,41 % 30,31 % 28,63 % 16,99 % 31,06 %
Ukrainian Internet sites 10,96 % 10,75 % 11,04 % 9,81 % 5,61 % 10,33 %
Ukrainian Social networking sites (VK, Facebook etc.) 11,05 % 6,98 % 6,45 % 8,16 % 4,56 % 7,97 %
Ukrainian Printed media 4,03 % 1,45 % 1,24 % 0,59 % 1,48 % 1,86 %
Ukrainian Radio 4,07 % 4,19 % 1,86 % 1,95 % 2,67 % 3,33 %
Russian TV 0,29 % 0,21 % 0,00 % 0,56 % 0,88 % 0,32 %
Russian Internet sites 0,00 % 0,44 % 1,35 % 0,29 % 0,68 % 0,43 %
Russian Social networking sites (VK, Facebook etc.) 1,31 % 0,33 % 0,00 % 1,24 % 0,87 % 0,74 %
Russian Printed media 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 %
Russian Radio 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 %
TV "LNR/DNR" 0,43 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,10 %
Internet sites "LNR/DNR" 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 %
Social networking sites (VK, Facebook etc.) "LNR/DNR" 0,74 % 0,16 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,23 %
Printed media "LNR/DNR" 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 %
Radio "LNR/DNR" 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,19 % 0,01 %
Your own friends and relatives who reside in NGCA 5,93 % 8,30 % 10,38 % 9,80 % 24,96 % 9,30 %
Your own acquaintance who reside in NGCA 3,04 % 5,72 % 4,27 % 8,40 % 8,65 % 5,64 %
IDPs in your community whose relatives, friends
or acquaintance reside in NGCA 2,27 % 5,87 % 6,04 % 6,67 % 6,75 % 5,26 %
All credible 3,68 % 3,36 % 2,45 % 4,07 % 3,97 % 3,51 %
(do not read out) DK 17,52 % 18,32 % 23,85 % 19,44 % 19,91 % 19,11 %
(do not read out) Refuse 1,35 % 0,51 % 0,75 % 0,38 % 1,82 % 0,79 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
16,99 %
5,61 %
4,56 %
1,48 %
2,67 %
0,88 %
0,68 %
0,87 %
0,00 %
0,00 %
0,00 %
0,00 %
0,00 %
0,00 %
0,19 %
24,96 %
8,65 %
6,75 %
3,97 %
19,91 %
1,82 %
100,00 %
(% among those, who are interested in the
information about NGCA)
18. Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Out of all these sources of information about
NGCA, which one do you think is the most
biased?
Ukrainian TV 18,07 % 15,27 % 19,65 % 16,49 % 18,03 % 16,86 %
Ukrainian Internet sites 7,07 % 7,85 % 5,70 % 5,93 % 7,31 % 6,99 %
Ukrainian Social networking sites (VK,Facebook etc.) 5,75 % 5,98 % 4,42 % 3,69 % 3,56 % 5,13 %
Ukrainian Printed media 3,12 % 3,12 % 1,62 % 1,32 % 0,88 % 2,45 %
Ukrainian Radio 4,50 % 3,47 % 3,01 % 2,07 % 1,75 % 3,27 %
Russian TV 0,36 % 0,00 % 0,63 % 1,07 % 1,24 % 0,45 %
Russian Internet sites 0,75 % 0,15 % 0,00 % 0,29 % 2,05 % 0,42 %
Russian Social networking sites (VK, Facebook etc.) 1,32 % 0,75 % 0,00 % 1,71 % 1,47 % 1,03 %
Russian Printed media 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 %
Russian Radio 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 %
TV "LNR/DNR" 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,22 % 0,01 %
Internet sites "LNR/DNR" 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,70 % 0,31 % 0,64 % 0,18 %
Social networking sites (VK, Facebook etc.) "LNR/DNR" 0,00 % 0,14 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,17 % 0,07 %
Printed media "LNR/DNR" 0,00 % 0,16 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,06 %
Radio "LNR/DNR" 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 %
Your own friends and relatives who reside in NGCA 1,51 % 2,61 % 1,04 % 4,77 % 3,21 % 2,64 %
Your own acquaintance who reside in NGCA 2,13 % 2,63 % 1,17 % 2,81 % 4,11 % 2,47 %
IDPs in your community whose relatives, friends
or acquaintance reside in NGCA 1,24 % 1,11 % 0,81 % 2,30 % 2,49 % 1,43 %
All credible 3,41 % 4,14 % 8,17 % 3,77 % 4,58 % 4,39 %
(do not read out) DK 49,58 % 52,23 % 51,29 % 52,44 % 47,28 % 51,24 %
(do not read out) Refuse 1,19 % 0,39 % 1,79 % 1,05 % 1,00 % 0,91 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
18,03 %
7,31 %
3,56 %
0,88 %
1,75 %
1,24 %
2,05 %
1,47 %
0,00 %
0,00 %
0,22 %
0,64 %
0,17 %
0,00 %
0,00 %
3,21 %
4,11 %
2,49 %
4,58 %
47,28 %
1,00 %
100,00 %
(% among those, who are interested in the
information about NGCA)
19. “Kalmius Group” is an informal association of Ukrainian analysts whose goal is to promote the restoration of the country’s sovereignty
in the temporarily occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Motivation of our Group’s activities is clear and transparent —
to contribute effectively and professionally to the restoration of the territorial integrity of the country. The name of the coalition comes
from the Kalmius River, which unites the free and temporarily occupied districts of the region and symbolizes the hope of citizens on
both sides of the demarcation line to peace-making by stopping the interstate conflict and restoring the unity of Ukraine, the rule of
law and order in the territories affected by the armed confrontation. More: www.kalmiusgroup.org
This study was presented by the “Kalmius Group” initiative under “Ukraine Confidence Building Initiative” (UCBI ІІ) project, funded by the
United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The study was made possible thanks to the generous support of the
American people through USAID. The product content is the sole responsibility of the “Kalmius Group” and does not necessarily reflect
the views of USAID or the US Government.
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Let’s imagine that the conflict in Donbas is
ended, and your employer decides to
establish work collaboration with NGCA-
based company. Please, assess your
attitude towards that
1 Completely reject 14,33 % 9,59 % 13,44 % 8,85 % 10,90 % 11,08 %
2 Rather reject 18,79 % 14,54 % 10,58 % 10,19 % 13,05 % 14,00 %
3 Rather accept 32,75 % 35,78 % 29,81 % 32,02 % 27,09 % 33,00 %
4 Fully accept 28,63 % 29,63 % 34,83 % 43,13 % 41,28 % 33,58 %
(do not read out) I don’t care 0,00 % 0,71 % 1,44 % 1,48 % 0,37 % 0,78 %
(do not read out) refuse to answer 1,14 % 0,70 % 1,11 % 0,59 % 0,42 % 0,81 %
(do not read out) DK 4,36 % 9,05 % 8,78 % 3,74 % 6,89 % 6,75 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Region
TOTAL
West Centre South East Donbas
Col% Col% Col% Col% Col% Col%
Do you communicate with any people who
reside in NGCA now?
Yes, with relatives 7,27 % 11,24 % 9,14 % 16,78 % 36,62 % 12,75 %
Yes, with colleagues 0,67 % 3,06 % 3,53 % 5,03 % 10,56 % 3,42 %
Yes, with friends or acquaintances 11,66 % 17,20 % 15,29 % 21,70 % 33,84 % 17,61 %
No 81,62 % 72,12 % 75,21 % 64,37 % 42,48 % 71,31 %
Other 0,36 % 0,12 % 0,77 % 0,35 % 0,15 % 0,30 %
Refuse to answer 0,46 % 0,56 % 0,80 % 0,37 % 0,00 % 0,49 %
TOTAL 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 % 100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
10,90 %
13,05 %
27,09 %
41,28 %
0,37 %
0,42 %
6,89 %
100,00 %
Donbas
Col%
36,62 %
10,56 %
33,84 %
42,48 %
0,15 %
0,00 %
100,00 %