03-23-05April 2014
PROJECT PLANNING LOGIC(-al) viewPROJECT PLANNING LOGIC(-al) view
Presented by Jan Biets
Jan_biets@hotmail.com +32(0)477 32 90 11 Mechelen - Belgium
page 1 • view on planning
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 page 2 • View on PLANNING
• It is not the author’s intention to be aligned with whatever existing methodology,
nor framework;
• ‘projects’– in this presentation, ‘projects’ can mean projects, programme, or portfolio
ForewordForeword
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014
Planning Logic : intention and purposesPlanning Logic : intention and purposes
page 3 • View on PLANNING
• What is the purpose:
– Increase success rate of -strategically- projects, by increasing / enhancing the
planning quality;
– Decrease failure rate of -strategically- projects, by optimising (improving) the
planning quality, optimising the elapsed time of project execution;
– Improve planning quality;
– Improve baseline information to take decision upon;
– Improve communication, by qualitative planning;
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014
PLANNING – logic : optimising you planningPLANNING – logic : optimising you planning
page 4 • View on Reporting
•Planning might be a complex task for a project manager;
•Although, it is the a priori straigth forward logical listing and
consistency of the de-rolling of tasks, thus his task: managing the
project with all tasks, sub-tasks, leading to a result: project delivery;
How to order the tasks?
•Correct ordering the tasks (most of the time chronologically, or
logically) might be very helpful to manage the project;
•Knowing what tasks to be linked is important to optimise the project
planning;
•finding the tasks (and identifying the correct order) in the (MS Project
) planning might be difficult, confusing and need your upmost
concentration (line x is the predecessor of line y);
The LOGIC is a tool which assists the project manager in linking most
optimal the tasks;
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014
PLANNING – logic : rules !PLANNING – logic : rules !
page 5 • View on Planning
Important to know (and apply):
•Never link summary tasks, to another / sub-sequent task
[ See presentation ]
•Always link tasks, status (deliverable), or milestones: measureable
facts;
•Could also be called ‘tollgate-ing’*
Tollgate:
Definition of tollgate: A measurable objective that is used to enable a prospective customer
to pass from one stage (e.g. task) to another (e.g. task) (according: Six Sigma )
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014
PLANNING – logic : what is in for me, PM !PLANNING – logic : what is in for me, PM !
page 6 • View on Planning
Tollgate:
Definition of tollgate: A measurable objective that is used to enable a prospective customer
to pass from one stage (e.g. task) to another (e.g. task) (according: Six Sigma )
Advantages:
•Analysing, knowing, and understanding your project;
•Quality check of the planning (most favourable order to execute);
•Identifying / understanding the ‘shortest way’ to deliver the project
(identifying / understanding critical path);
•Optimising & reducing elapsed time by logically flow of tasks (and
milestones)
Dis-advantages:
•none
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014
PLANNING – logic : basicsPLANNING – logic : basics
page 7 • View on Planning
‘typically ‘ “a project” starts with:
• signed contract,
• gathered ‘requirements’,
• “architectural design’ approved by appointed stakeholder(-s), and
• “functional design” approved by appointed stakeholder(-s);
After sign-off of the ‘functional design’ (milestone / deliverable) your
project is ready to set off!
E.g.proof of concept (PoC), bill of materials (BoM), operating system
(OS), hardware (HW),… can be started up, in parallel (simultaneously)
Important to know:
The steps (blue balls on the next slides) are always ‘finalised’ /
approved / formally accepted /or tollgated statuses
Note: the numbering is to increase the read-ability of your planning (WBS)
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 page 8 • View on PLANNING
PLANNING: example 1: 18 days elapsed timePLANNING: example 1: 18 days elapsed time
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014
PLANNING – logic : example 1PLANNING – logic : example 1
page 9 • View on Planning
Abbreviations:
CPM – Critical Path Method
FQT – final qualification testing
FAT – factory acceptance test
POC – proof of concept
logic planning composition
Critical Path method (elapsed time)
Rationale:
•quality check of planning
Explanation:
•optimising or reducing elapsed time
by logically flow of milestones.
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 page 10 • View on PLANNING
PLANNING: example 1: 12 days elapsed timePLANNING: example 1: 12 days elapsed time
Optimising the planning by linking the correct tasks on a logical manner,
offers a gain of 33%. In this example duration 18 days to 12 days.
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014
1
Requirements
approved
2
Architectural
Design
approved
3
HL Functional
Design
approved
4
system
detailed
design appr.
4
1
purchased
4
2
installed
4
3
tested
5
approach
&strategy
5
1
Scenario’s
5
2
Data
preparation
Architectural
6
Instruct&
inform
Test
People
Process
7
Updated
UC
7
1
validated
UC
7
2
approved
UC
6
1
Profiling&
organisation
6
2
OPS-training
System
8
installed
8
2
configured
5
3
Final tested
9
Acceptance (for factory
qualification testing)
1
0
Final
Acceptance
& production
31/jul
7
3
approved
Detailed
FD(R2)
‘Project’ As-built
file&documentation
Administration
6
2
SYS-training
8
1
drivers
Life Cycle
mgt
1
1
Life cycle
mgt
Abbreviations:
UC: use case
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014
PLANNING – logic : example 3PLANNING – logic : example 3
page 12 • View on PLANNING
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014
PLANNING – logic : example 4PLANNING – logic : example 4
page 13 • View on PLANNING
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014
PLANNING – logic : example 5PLANNING – logic : example 5
page 14 • View on PLANNING
M
1
M
2
M
3
Requirements approved
Architecture design
approved
Functional design (FD)
approved
M
4
PCB: Detailed
design
approved
M
4
PCB:
prototype
approved
Ticketer
detail design
approved
M
4
Ticketer
prototype
approved
M
5
M
8
Drivers:detail
design
approved
M
9
Ticketer OS:
released
M
5
.
1M
5
.
2
M
5
Ticketer MOS
port approved
Ticketer MOS
port release
approved
Master device
prototype
approved
M
6
Master device
CE certified
Master device
housing detail
design
approved
M
4
Master device
housing
prototype
approved
M
4
Master device
business
application
detail design
approved
M
9
Master device
business
application
phase1
released
M
9
Master device
business
application
phase2
released
M
9
Master device
business
application
phase3
released
M
9
Master device
business
application
released FQT
M
9
Technical
frame
detailed
design
approved
M
8
Technical
frame
released
M
8
Master device
tooling
released
M
7.
1
Master device
BoM released
M
8
Master device
sw released
M
8
Master device
released for
production
M
8
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014
Easy to modify according the nature of your project
page 15 • View on PLANNING
PLANNING – logic : and now youPLANNING – logic : and now you
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014
Time is up.
Much more to talk about this interesting topic….
Questions ?
Linkedin Jan Biets - Jan_biets@hotmail.com - +32(0)477 329011
page 16 • View on Planning
? ?????? ? ?
PMO – PMO as a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service Juni 2012
Time is up. Much more to talk about this interesting topic….
Questions ?
Linkedin Jan Biets - Jan_biets@hotmail.com - +32(0)477 329011
page 17 • View on Reporting
? ?????? ? ?

Project planning logic, how to optimise your schedule

  • 1.
    03-23-05April 2014 PROJECT PLANNINGLOGIC(-al) viewPROJECT PLANNING LOGIC(-al) view Presented by Jan Biets Jan_biets@hotmail.com +32(0)477 32 90 11 Mechelen - Belgium page 1 • view on planning
  • 2.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 page 2 • View on PLANNING • It is not the author’s intention to be aligned with whatever existing methodology, nor framework; • ‘projects’– in this presentation, ‘projects’ can mean projects, programme, or portfolio ForewordForeword
  • 3.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 Planning Logic : intention and purposesPlanning Logic : intention and purposes page 3 • View on PLANNING • What is the purpose: – Increase success rate of -strategically- projects, by increasing / enhancing the planning quality; – Decrease failure rate of -strategically- projects, by optimising (improving) the planning quality, optimising the elapsed time of project execution; – Improve planning quality; – Improve baseline information to take decision upon; – Improve communication, by qualitative planning;
  • 4.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 PLANNING – logic : optimising you planningPLANNING – logic : optimising you planning page 4 • View on Reporting •Planning might be a complex task for a project manager; •Although, it is the a priori straigth forward logical listing and consistency of the de-rolling of tasks, thus his task: managing the project with all tasks, sub-tasks, leading to a result: project delivery; How to order the tasks? •Correct ordering the tasks (most of the time chronologically, or logically) might be very helpful to manage the project; •Knowing what tasks to be linked is important to optimise the project planning; •finding the tasks (and identifying the correct order) in the (MS Project ) planning might be difficult, confusing and need your upmost concentration (line x is the predecessor of line y); The LOGIC is a tool which assists the project manager in linking most optimal the tasks;
  • 5.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 PLANNING – logic : rules !PLANNING – logic : rules ! page 5 • View on Planning Important to know (and apply): •Never link summary tasks, to another / sub-sequent task [ See presentation ] •Always link tasks, status (deliverable), or milestones: measureable facts; •Could also be called ‘tollgate-ing’* Tollgate: Definition of tollgate: A measurable objective that is used to enable a prospective customer to pass from one stage (e.g. task) to another (e.g. task) (according: Six Sigma )
  • 6.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 PLANNING – logic : what is in for me, PM !PLANNING – logic : what is in for me, PM ! page 6 • View on Planning Tollgate: Definition of tollgate: A measurable objective that is used to enable a prospective customer to pass from one stage (e.g. task) to another (e.g. task) (according: Six Sigma ) Advantages: •Analysing, knowing, and understanding your project; •Quality check of the planning (most favourable order to execute); •Identifying / understanding the ‘shortest way’ to deliver the project (identifying / understanding critical path); •Optimising & reducing elapsed time by logically flow of tasks (and milestones) Dis-advantages: •none
  • 7.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 PLANNING – logic : basicsPLANNING – logic : basics page 7 • View on Planning ‘typically ‘ “a project” starts with: • signed contract, • gathered ‘requirements’, • “architectural design’ approved by appointed stakeholder(-s), and • “functional design” approved by appointed stakeholder(-s); After sign-off of the ‘functional design’ (milestone / deliverable) your project is ready to set off! E.g.proof of concept (PoC), bill of materials (BoM), operating system (OS), hardware (HW),… can be started up, in parallel (simultaneously) Important to know: The steps (blue balls on the next slides) are always ‘finalised’ / approved / formally accepted /or tollgated statuses Note: the numbering is to increase the read-ability of your planning (WBS)
  • 8.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 page 8 • View on PLANNING PLANNING: example 1: 18 days elapsed timePLANNING: example 1: 18 days elapsed time
  • 9.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 PLANNING – logic : example 1PLANNING – logic : example 1 page 9 • View on Planning Abbreviations: CPM – Critical Path Method FQT – final qualification testing FAT – factory acceptance test POC – proof of concept logic planning composition Critical Path method (elapsed time) Rationale: •quality check of planning Explanation: •optimising or reducing elapsed time by logically flow of milestones.
  • 10.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 page 10 • View on PLANNING PLANNING: example 1: 12 days elapsed timePLANNING: example 1: 12 days elapsed time Optimising the planning by linking the correct tasks on a logical manner, offers a gain of 33%. In this example duration 18 days to 12 days.
  • 11.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 1 Requirements approved 2 Architectural Design approved 3 HL Functional Design approved 4 system detailed design appr. 4 1 purchased 4 2 installed 4 3 tested 5 approach &strategy 5 1 Scenario’s 5 2 Data preparation Architectural 6 Instruct& inform Test People Process 7 Updated UC 7 1 validated UC 7 2 approved UC 6 1 Profiling& organisation 6 2 OPS-training System 8 installed 8 2 configured 5 3 Final tested 9 Acceptance (for factory qualification testing) 1 0 Final Acceptance & production 31/jul 7 3 approved Detailed FD(R2) ‘Project’ As-built file&documentation Administration 6 2 SYS-training 8 1 drivers Life Cycle mgt 1 1 Life cycle mgt Abbreviations: UC: use case
  • 12.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 PLANNING – logic : example 3PLANNING – logic : example 3 page 12 • View on PLANNING
  • 13.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 PLANNING – logic : example 4PLANNING – logic : example 4 page 13 • View on PLANNING
  • 14.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 PLANNING – logic : example 5PLANNING – logic : example 5 page 14 • View on PLANNING M 1 M 2 M 3 Requirements approved Architecture design approved Functional design (FD) approved M 4 PCB: Detailed design approved M 4 PCB: prototype approved Ticketer detail design approved M 4 Ticketer prototype approved M 5 M 8 Drivers:detail design approved M 9 Ticketer OS: released M 5 . 1M 5 . 2 M 5 Ticketer MOS port approved Ticketer MOS port release approved Master device prototype approved M 6 Master device CE certified Master device housing detail design approved M 4 Master device housing prototype approved M 4 Master device business application detail design approved M 9 Master device business application phase1 released M 9 Master device business application phase2 released M 9 Master device business application phase3 released M 9 Master device business application released FQT M 9 Technical frame detailed design approved M 8 Technical frame released M 8 Master device tooling released M 7. 1 Master device BoM released M 8 Master device sw released M 8 Master device released for production M 8
  • 15.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 Easy to modify according the nature of your project page 15 • View on PLANNING PLANNING – logic : and now youPLANNING – logic : and now you
  • 16.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service April 2014 Time is up. Much more to talk about this interesting topic…. Questions ? Linkedin Jan Biets - Jan_biets@hotmail.com - +32(0)477 329011 page 16 • View on Planning ? ?????? ? ?
  • 17.
    PMO – PMOas a ServicePMO – PMO as a Service Juni 2012 Time is up. Much more to talk about this interesting topic…. Questions ? Linkedin Jan Biets - Jan_biets@hotmail.com - +32(0)477 329011 page 17 • View on Reporting ? ?????? ? ?