Self-paced exercise for students to follow in teams - to ask questions about FINDING and ANALYZING their sources. Focused on UMBC, but adaptable for your local University/College. Helps students create an annotated bibliography. ENGL 100
This presentation was given to the local chapter of the International Society of Managing and Technical Editors (ISMTE) by Allison McMullen and Michele Avissar-Whiting of AJE/Research Square.
Self-paced exercise for students to follow in teams - to ask questions about FINDING and ANALYZING their sources. Focused on UMBC, but adaptable for your local University/College. Helps students create an annotated bibliography. ENGL 100
This presentation was given to the local chapter of the International Society of Managing and Technical Editors (ISMTE) by Allison McMullen and Michele Avissar-Whiting of AJE/Research Square.
COMS 360 Litke – Topic Exploration Assignment 1
Topic Exploration Assignment 1 requires you to select a topic related to EITHER chapter 3 (women’s
rhetorical movements) OR chapter 4 (men’s rhetorical movements) and to explore that topic in greater
detail. You will begin your exploration by reviewing the related material in chapter 3 or chapter 4 and
then will conduct additional exploration of your topic. You will need to narrow your topic to meet the
requirements of the assignment. Keep in mind that papers must be specifically focused on gender.
This assignment serves to strengthen skills in information competence relative to research and support of
ideas. Consequently, you are required to conduct additional research on your topic. Topic Exploration 1
must include a minimum of three current, scholarly academic sources. For Topic Exploration 1, the
textbook can be included as one of the three minimum required sources but should not be the only source
or the primary source of supporting material for your exploration of your selected topic. For most
papers/topics, “current” would typically mean roughly the last ten years, however, some topics might
warrant older sources. The assignment requires that you locate scholarly or academic sources which will
be the general expectation. However, some topics might be so current that the only available sources
might not be found in scholarly/journal type sources. So, the requirement for current, scholarly, academic
sources could vary given topics selected. All papers require credible sources. Make sure that you have a
minimum of three references; that is a requirement of the assignment.
Requirements and Evaluation:
Once you have a topic related to chapter 3 (women’s rhetorical movements) or chapter 4 (men’s rhetorical
movements, you will need to conduct additional research on your topic. You will summarize what you
have learned in a two (full) page minimum, (and three page, maximum), typed, double spaced 12-point
font, Times New Roman paper, standard 1” margins on all sides (unjustified). Sources must be cited in
text and in a reference list in APA format (see the next page for some guidelines on APA format). Provide
ONLY your name in the upper right corner of your paper. Skip a line, and begin your essay. Do not
include a title, headings, running head, or any other identifying information. This will allow you
maximum space to convey your material. Do not plagiarize ANY PART of your paper.
All papers must be well written, clearly supported, and thoroughly proofread. Papers will be evaluated on
content, quality and depth of research, clarity, organization, citation, style, and format. If you have
questions, please email me.
Length: Expected length is two full pages minimum (three pages, maximum)
Worth: up to 20% of course grade
Due Date: no later than Wednesday, 10/5/22, at the beginning of class
[See the information on the ...
Write Your Discussion PostAnalyzing LiteraturePaul and E.docxannetnash8266
Write Your Discussion Post
Analyzing Literature
Paul and Elder (2012) associate three phases with their definition of critical thinking (p. xix):
It analyzes thinking . . . By focusing on the parts of thinking in any situation—its purpose, question, information, inferences, assumptions, concepts, implications, and point of view.
It evaluates thinking . . . By figuring out its strengths and weaknesses: the extent to which it is clear, accurate, precise, relevant, deep, broad, logical, significant, and fair.
It improves thinking . . . By building on its strengths while reducing its weaknesses.
Your Literature Review assignment due this week will apply all of these phases of critical thinking to the scholarly sources you have selected. For this discussion activity, you will select one journal article you have selected for the Literature Review assignment and apply the first phase to analyze the thinking represented in the article:
First, describe the topics for which you researched relevant scholarly articles.
Next, identify one of these articles and explain how it is relevant to your topic.
Then use the
Elements of Thought Discussion Template [DOC]
to analyze the article:
What is the main purpose of the article?
What is the key question the author of the article is addressing?
What is the most important information in the article?
What key conclusions (inferences) did the author of the article come to and present?
What were the most important ideas (concepts) that one would need to understand to understand the author's line of reasoning?
What were the main assumptions (that is, what the author is taking for granted that might be questioned)?
What was the main point of view (that is, the author's perspective) presented in the article?
Reference
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2012).
Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life
(3rd ed.). Pearson.
.
COMS 360 Litke – Topic Exploration Assignment 1
Topic Exploration Assignment 1 requires you to select a topic related to EITHER chapter 3 (women’s
rhetorical movements) OR chapter 4 (men’s rhetorical movements) and to explore that topic in greater
detail. You will begin your exploration by reviewing the related material in chapter 3 or chapter 4 and
then will conduct additional exploration of your topic. You will need to narrow your topic to meet the
requirements of the assignment. Keep in mind that papers must be specifically focused on gender.
This assignment serves to strengthen skills in information competence relative to research and support of
ideas. Consequently, you are required to conduct additional research on your topic. Topic Exploration 1
must include a minimum of three current, scholarly academic sources. For Topic Exploration 1, the
textbook can be included as one of the three minimum required sources but should not be the only source
or the primary source of supporting material for your exploration of your selected topic. For most
papers/topics, “current” would typically mean roughly the last ten years, however, some topics might
warrant older sources. The assignment requires that you locate scholarly or academic sources which will
be the general expectation. However, some topics might be so current that the only available sources
might not be found in scholarly/journal type sources. So, the requirement for current, scholarly, academic
sources could vary given topics selected. All papers require credible sources. Make sure that you have a
minimum of three references; that is a requirement of the assignment.
Requirements and Evaluation:
Once you have a topic related to chapter 3 (women’s rhetorical movements) or chapter 4 (men’s rhetorical
movements, you will need to conduct additional research on your topic. You will summarize what you
have learned in a two (full) page minimum, (and three page, maximum), typed, double spaced 12-point
font, Times New Roman paper, standard 1” margins on all sides (unjustified). Sources must be cited in
text and in a reference list in APA format (see the next page for some guidelines on APA format). Provide
ONLY your name in the upper right corner of your paper. Skip a line, and begin your essay. Do not
include a title, headings, running head, or any other identifying information. This will allow you
maximum space to convey your material. Do not plagiarize ANY PART of your paper.
All papers must be well written, clearly supported, and thoroughly proofread. Papers will be evaluated on
content, quality and depth of research, clarity, organization, citation, style, and format. If you have
questions, please email me.
Length: Expected length is two full pages minimum (three pages, maximum)
Worth: up to 20% of course grade
Due Date: no later than Wednesday, 10/5/22, at the beginning of class
[See the information on the ...
Write Your Discussion PostAnalyzing LiteraturePaul and E.docxannetnash8266
Write Your Discussion Post
Analyzing Literature
Paul and Elder (2012) associate three phases with their definition of critical thinking (p. xix):
It analyzes thinking . . . By focusing on the parts of thinking in any situation—its purpose, question, information, inferences, assumptions, concepts, implications, and point of view.
It evaluates thinking . . . By figuring out its strengths and weaknesses: the extent to which it is clear, accurate, precise, relevant, deep, broad, logical, significant, and fair.
It improves thinking . . . By building on its strengths while reducing its weaknesses.
Your Literature Review assignment due this week will apply all of these phases of critical thinking to the scholarly sources you have selected. For this discussion activity, you will select one journal article you have selected for the Literature Review assignment and apply the first phase to analyze the thinking represented in the article:
First, describe the topics for which you researched relevant scholarly articles.
Next, identify one of these articles and explain how it is relevant to your topic.
Then use the
Elements of Thought Discussion Template [DOC]
to analyze the article:
What is the main purpose of the article?
What is the key question the author of the article is addressing?
What is the most important information in the article?
What key conclusions (inferences) did the author of the article come to and present?
What were the most important ideas (concepts) that one would need to understand to understand the author's line of reasoning?
What were the main assumptions (that is, what the author is taking for granted that might be questioned)?
What was the main point of view (that is, the author's perspective) presented in the article?
Reference
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2012).
Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life
(3rd ed.). Pearson.
.
Annotated BibliographyDue Nov 2829GenreMediumAnnotated .docxdurantheseldine
Annotated Bibliography
Due: Nov 28/29
Genre/Medium: Annotated Bibliography
Purpose: The writer of an annotated bibliography uses the bibliography to compile a list of sources to build research. The form includes a brief summary of the source and your own critical assessment of its relevance, objectivity, appropriateness, and usefulness. It is a tool that helps you keep an organized and thoughtful record of the research process and relevant information about the topic.
To this end, you will put together an annotated bibliography in preparation for Assignment 3. In addition to the primary text (Whistling Vivaldi) the bibliography will include three types of textual information: 1) a mainstream news/ magazine article, 2) a scholarly/academic “peer reviewed” article, and 3) a web-based multimedia or blog-style article.
Format: Your annotated bibliographies must paragraphs must contain a topic sentence, clear evidence from the reading, and coherent sentences on a topic. It will use transitions affectively to cohere the overall piece together. It must answer: 1) What is the information in the article you are summarizing? and 2) What is your critical assessment of the article?
Instructions:
1. Cite in MLA-citation format the name of the article.
2. Draft one or two paragraphs for each of the sources you list in your annotated bibliography.
3. Review the information in the bibliographies with your classmates to improve the grammar of the text and consider points that might help you build your argument in Assignment 3.
Grading Rubric:
25-20
20-15
15-10
10-5
5-0
Content & evidence
Excellent annotated bibliographies. It lays out the aspects of the topic well and evaluates the sources effectively.
Good annotated bibliographies. It lays out the aspects of the topic well and evaluates the sources.
It is an adequate annotated bibliographies. It lays out the aspects of the topic well, but does not evaluates the sources.
Does not fulfill the requirements of an annotated bibliographies.
Paragraphs are too poorly written to be useful.
Information Literacy
Citation is correct. It also provides specific evaluations about the appropriateness of the medium and the information for academic research.
Citation is correct. It provides specific evaluations about the appropriateness of the medium.
Citation is correct. Citation is accurate. It needs to speak to the appropriateness of the medium and the information for academic research.
Citation is not correct. Does not include any information about the medium and appropriateness for academic research.
Citation and assessment are not adequate.
Summary Questions – Aristotle, Confucius
Put things in your own words unless the question asks for a direct quote.
Answer each question in 8-12 sentences.
1. How does Aristotle describe the relation between virtue and pleasure? Give and
explain one direct quote from the reading as part of your response.
2. Think of a famous person (politician, celebrity.
ENT3103 - Article review (10) of Assessment 1An article revie.docxelbanglis
ENT3103 - Article review (10%) of Assessment 1
An article review format allows scholars or students to analyze and evaluate the work of other experts in a given field. Outside of the education system, experts often review the work of their peers for clarity, originality, and contribution to the discipline of study.
That is a professional paper writing which demands a high level of in-depth analysis and a well-structured presentation of arguments. It is a critical, constructive evaluation of literature in a particular field through summary, classification, analysis, and comparison.
Students should present a clear understanding of the topic you’ve been working on.
The purpose of this writing exercise is for you to learn to seek out information and to write an evaluative review of a journal article.
Writing Involves:
· Summarization, classification, analysis, critiques, and comparison.
· The analysis, evaluation, and comparison require use theories, ideas, and research, relevant to the subject area of the article.
· As you progress with reading your article, organize your thoughts into coherent sections in an outline. As you read, jot down important facts, contributions, or contradictions. Identify the shortcomings and strengths of your publication. Begin to map your outline accordingly.
· Outline your review: Look at your summary to see if the author was clear about each of them. Mark the points that could use some improvement, as well as the ones where the author was clear and accurate and where s/he pointed out something innovative. Then put together the lists of strong points and drawbacks and summarize them. For example, a strong point may be the introduction of new information, and a drawback may be the lack of accuracy in representing the existing knowledge on the topic. Add these outcomes to your study and back them up with evidence from the text of the article.
Answering these questions should facilitate your outline writing:
· What was the goal of the article?
· What theories does the author dwell upon?
· Is the author clear with definitions?
· Is the supportive evidence relevant?
· What is the place of the article in its field of knowledge?
· Does it contribute to the progress in this field?
· Does the author convey his or her thoughts clearly
Using the APA Format
· Web: Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month Date of Publication). Title. Retrieved from {link}
· Journal: Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Publication Year). Publication Title. Periodical Title, Volume (Issue), pp.-pp.
· Newspaper: Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month Date of Publication). Publication Title. Magazine Title, pp. xx-xx.
Structure of Article review:
· Make sure your Article Review has a title
· Start with an introduction that mentions the article for the review.
· Follows with a summary of the main points of the article.
· Highlights the positive aspects and facts presented in the pu ...
1 Annotated Bibliography for Aging and Family Dynamics simisterchristen
1
Annotated Bibliography for Aging and Family Dynamics
Overview:
A bibliography is a list of all cited sources in the research paper. In American Psychological
Association (APA) style papers, bibliographies are called “References,” and they consist of
alphabetically ordered lists of sources cited in a paper. The annotated bibliography is a list of
sources with summaries and commentary that you might use to develop a research paper,
literature review, or rely on as part of your discipline’s knowledge base. Annotated
bibliographies are excellent tools for sharing the results of research with peers, and for
demonstrating your own competence reading, interpreting and evaluating the literature in your
discipline or research area.
In this assignment, you will develop a 1,600-1,800-word summary/evaluative annotated
bibliography for five peer reviewed journal articles on a topic related to this class (e.g., elder
abuse, age-related discrimination, aging in place, grandparents caring for their children, caring
for frail elders, etc.). The Human Services Program at FSCJ uses APA style for all research
papers, manuscripts, projects, etc. Note that the APA does not have strict guidelines for the
annotated bibliography. However, this assignment requires you to reference the APA manual for
formatting the following elements:
• Title page
• Abstract
• Citations (in-text, and complete end of text references)
• Headings
• References page
Please be aware that there are many different types of annotated bibliographies—some are
simple lists with one or two descriptive sentences, while others are full paragraphs. We will use
the latter format for this paper. See the provided sample of an Annotated Bibliography.
There are three stages for this assignment. Each stage is graded separately. The instructions,
requirements, and rubrics are provided below. Be sure to refer to the grading rubric for the
specific types of comments you need to include.
Stage 1: Selecting Journal Articles (15 Points)
Instructions:
All articles must come from FSCJ’s databases and must be approved by your instructor.
All must relate to the material covered in this class.
In order to help you locate appropriate sources, please use the Do & Don’t guidelines below:
DO DON’T
• Access the FSCJ’s Library and Learning
Commons and use appropriate search
terms, such as “financial elder abuse,”
“age-related discrimination,” or “aging in
• Use books, book reviews, review articles,
meta-analytic reviews, editorials,
Wikipedia, blogs, or websites.
2
place,” or “grandparents raising their
grandchildren.” Pick one topic only for
your review.
• Be sure to narrow your search to peer
reviewed journals. Pay attention to the
purposes, participants, variables, and
implications of the study.
• Use social work, psychology, and
sociology journals only.
• Keep track of the exact key words you use
to search for your articles and databa ...
Ab case study assignment help Australiaasmits kharel
We provide live online tutoring which can be accessed at anytime and anywhere according to student’s convenience. We have tutors in every subject such as Math, Chemistry, Biology, Physics and English whatever be the school level. Our college and university level tutors provide engineering online tutoring in areas such as Computer Science, Electrical and Electronics engineering, Mechanical engineering and Chemical engineering.
• www.onlineassignmenthelp.com.au
• www.cheapassignmenthelp.co.uk
• www.freeassignmenthelp.com
• www.cheapassignmenthelp.com.au
• http://btechndassignment.cheapassignmenthelp.co.uk/
We provide live online tutoring which can be accessed at anytime and anywhere according to student’s convenience. We have tutors in every subject such as Math, Chemistry, Biology, Physics and English whatever be the school level. Our college and university level tutors provide engineering online tutoring in areas such as Computer Science, Electrical and Electronics engineering, Mechanical engineering and Chemical engineering.
• www.onlineassignmenthelp.com.au
• www.cheapassignmenthelp.co.uk
• www.freeassignmenthelp.com
• www.cheapassignmenthelp.com.au
• http://btechndassignment.cheapassignmenthelp.co.uk/
Essay #4 Engaging in Civic DebatesResearch-based Persuasive Arg.docxSALU18
Essay #4: Engaging in Civic Debates
Research-based Persuasive Argument Essay
Assignment: For this assignment, you will identify an issue hopefully of interest to you that represents a contemporary issue being debated in public discourse. This issue can be at the local, national, or international level. You must research your issue and produce a persuasive argument about it in 6-9 pages (double spaced).
The paper will follow MLA format. The font should be Times New Roman or Cambria 12pt font. You must have a minimum of seven (7) outside sources for this paper, although a strong paper will likely contain many sources beyond this minimum. These sources should cover both sides of this issue and attention should be paid to the credibility and degree of ideological bias/affiliation of the publication source. You should strive to include at least two (2) scholarly journal articles as part of your sources. This paper will follow the model of the formal argument essays studied in class and will contain a literature review, rebuttal of the opposing arguments (including concessions as needed), additional research & arguments that will support your side of the argument, as well as effective introductory and concluding sections/paragraphs. The paper will be drafted and reviewed in various sections prior to final submission (see due dates below).
Through various assignments you will begin to stage the development of your essay and situate your argument within a larger conversation, including engaging with audiences whose stance on the issue may differ from your own. The Annotated Bibliography (see separate handout) will allow you to familiarize yourself with various perspectives and arguments surrounding this issue and the Literature Review (see separate handout) will provide you with the opportunity to show your understanding of the larger context surrounding this debate (while also developing effective synthesis writing techniques). Next, the Rebuttal Paper (see separate handout) will provide a space for you to specifically address and respond to the arguments made by the opposition. These various essays will become the two major “sections” of your final Research Paper, accompanied by an effective introduction and conclusion and an additional body section devoted to additional arguments that may convince a reader that your stance on this issue is correct.
Professor Name
Course Name
Date
Sample Annotated Bibliography
Student Essay Title: The Various Interpretations of Steinbeck’s Fiction
Barnes, Rebecca. “Steinbeck’s East of Eden.” The Explicator, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 159-61. Project
Muse, doi.10.1193/bjp.bk.122.09345.
Barnes analyzes Steinbeck’s novel East of Eden, paying close attention to the literary allusions found within the story. Barnes focuses primarily on the allusions to Pandora, a character from Greek mythology, and to biblical figures: Adam, Eve, Cain, and Able. She also pays close attention to the repeated symbolic usage of boxe ...
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLeEvonCanales257
EDUC 701
Course Project: Final Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Title Page and Abstract
10 points
A title page is present and provides clarity to the purpose of the paper. An effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body is provided by the abstract. Word count (100–120 words) is met.
8 to 9 points
A title page is present but lacks clarity to the purpose of the paper. The Abstract exists but does not provide an effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body. Minimum of 100 words is met.
1 to 7 points
A title page is missing. The Abstract is vague and does not convey a personal philosophy of education. The 100-word minimum is not met.
0 points
Not present
Body – Introduction/ Thesis Statement
10 points
Introduction is well-constructed and presents a clear explanation of the problem, conveys a good argument of why the problem is good to research, concludes with the research question, and is strongly aligned with the title and body of the paper.
8 to 9 points
A somewhat clear presentation of the problem is present, an argument why the problem is good to research is conveyed, and the title and body of the paper aligns with it.
1 to 8 points
The problem is poorly introduced, vaguely stated, or does not align with the title and/or body of the paper.
0 points
Not present
Body – Literature Review and Learning Theory or Theories
37 to 40 points
Literature synthesizes references to support the topic. Learning theories are introduced as well as foundational people and their works. Theoretical frameworks are presented coherently and lay a foundation for the overall learning theory education.
34 to 36 points
Literature review somewhat synthesizes the references to support the topic. Learning theories are somewhat introduced. Theoretical frameworks are mostly presented and lay a foundation for the overall learning theory education.
1 to 33 points
Literature review poorly synthesizes the references that support the topic. Learning theories are poorly introduced and explained. Theoretical frameworks are not presented.
0 points
Not present
Body – Key Terms
18 to 20 points
Key terms are well defined, and definitions are supported by authoritative sources.
17 points
Key terms are defined, and most definitions are supported by authoritative sources.
1 to 16 points
Key terms are adequately defined, and most definitions are not supported by an authoritative source.
0 points
Not present
Body – Gaps in Literature
18 to 20 points
Gaps in the literature are thoroughly identified and described by careful analysis of content.
17 points
Gaps in the literature are somewhat identified and described by careful analysis of content.
1 to 16 points
Gaps in the literature are not present or are inadequately described.
0 points
Not present
Body – Biblical Worldview
18 to 20 points
A biblical worldview perspective is clearly articulated and is supported by appropr ...
Article is uploaded1). Psychological PurposeThis paper serv.docxssusera34210
Article: is uploaded
1). Psychological Purpose
This paper serves several purposes, the first of which is helping you gain insight into research papers in psychology. As this may be your first time reading and writing papers in psychology, one goal of Paper I is to give you insight into what goes into such papers. This article critique paper will help you learn about the various sections of an empirical research report by reading at least
one
peer-reviewed articles (articles that have a Title Page, Abstract*, Literature Review, Methods Section, Results Section, and References Page—I have already selected some articles for you to critique, so make sure you only critique one in the folder provided on Canvas) This paper will also give you some insights into how the results sections are written in APA formatted research articles. Pay close attention to those sections, as throughout this course you’ll be writing up some results of your own!
In this relatively short paper, you will read one of five articles posted on Canvas and summarize what the authors did and what they found. The first part of the paper should focus on summarizing the design the authors used for their project. That is, you will identify the independent and dependent variables, talk about how the authors carried out their study, and then summarize the results (you don’t need to fully understand the statistics in the results, but try to get a sense of what the authors did in their analyses). In the second part of the paper, you will critique the article for its methodological strengths and weaknesses. Finally, in part three, you will provide your references for the Article Critique Paper in APA format.
2). APA Formatting Purpose
The second purpose of the Article Critique paper is to teach you proper American Psychological Association (APA) formatting. In the instructions below, I tell you how to format your paper using APA style. There are a lot of very specific requirements in APA papers, so pay attention to the instructions below as well as the APA style powerpoint on Canvas. We are using the 7th edition of the APA style manual.
3). Writing Purpose
Finally, this paper is intended to help you grow as a writer. Few psychology classes give you the chance to write papers and receive feedback on your work. This class will! We will give you feedback on this paper in terms of content, spelling, and grammar.
Article Critique Paper (60 points possible)
Each student is required to write an article critique paper based on one of the research articles present on Canvas only those articles listed on Canvas can be critiqued – if you critique a different article, it will not be graded). If you are unclear about any of this information, please ask.
What is an article critique paper?
An article critique is a written communication that conveys your understanding of a research article and how it relates to the conceptual issues of interest to this course.
This article critique .
Builder.ai Founder Sachin Dev Duggal's Strategic Approach to Create an Innova...Ramesh Iyer
In today's fast-changing business world, Companies that adapt and embrace new ideas often need help to keep up with the competition. However, fostering a culture of innovation takes much work. It takes vision, leadership and willingness to take risks in the right proportion. Sachin Dev Duggal, co-founder of Builder.ai, has perfected the art of this balance, creating a company culture where creativity and growth are nurtured at each stage.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...
Project Guidelines
1. ESS 2222 – Kyle Ochsner
Project Guidelines
The paper is to be on a topic of your choice, as long as it relates to resistance training and/or
conditioning. Research something that intrigues your interest and that you want to learn more
about in the area of exercise and sports science. Your paper should consist of at least these three
points:
1) Summary of article
2) How it applies to resistance training and conditioning
3) Your thoughts and opinions (reflection) on the article
Format:
-12 point font (Hand written assignments will automatically receive a “0”)
-Double space
-Minimum of 150 words
-Maximum of 1 single page (front side only)
-Peer Reviewed article
- Scientific journals (ex.: Journal of Strength and Conditioning, Research Quarterly,
Journal of Athletic Training, and etc.)
-Proper Citation:
Author(s). (Year Published). Title of Article. Name of Journal. Volume number (Issue number),
page number(s).
Example:
Carnpinelli, R. N., Otto, R. M. & Winett, R. A. (2004). A critical analysis of the ACSM position
stand on resistance training: insufficient evidence to support recommended training protocols.
Journal of Exercise Physiology Online. 7(3), 1-60.
Rubric
Summary 2 points
Relevance to class 2 points
Reflection 2 points
Proper citation 2 points
Proper format 1 point
Peer Reviewed article 1 point
