More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (18)
Similar to Ab case study assignment help Australia
Similar to Ab case study assignment help Australia (20)
More from asmits kharel
More from asmits kharel (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Ab case study assignment help Australia
- 1. AB case study by Gayathri Muniandy Submission date: 24-Jul-2017 01:12PM (UTC+1000) Submission ID: 832700865 File name: 31215_59881709_1064177977_AB_case_study.docx (28.34K) Word count: 1884 Character count: 10966
- 6. 6 7 8 9
- 11. QM QM QM FINAL GRADE 45/100 AB case study GRADEMARK REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS Instructor PAGE 1 PAGE 2 Comment 1 no comment Comment 2 researchs? Strikethrough. Comment 4 Aim , methodology of article not discussed. Incorrect Spelling Methodology Not clearly or adequatley discussed Limitations (weaknesses) Not discussed Comment 5 no comment
- 12. QM QM QM QM QM QM PAGE 3 Methodology Not discussed Limitations (weaknesses) Not clearly discusssed PAGE 4 Methodology Not discussed Limitations (weaknesses) Not discussed PAGE 5 Comment 6 how are they relevant? Comment 7 unclear what the short synopsis meant? Comment 8 you are to discuss the condition related to heart f ailure based on the articles selected. Comment 9 This is not a strength of the selected article. PAGE 6 Support Support Needed:<br>A well-written paper will include strong support f or its thesis. Support f or your thesis should come f rom primary (original documents, interviews, and personal experiences) and secondary (inf ormation that has been processed or interpreted by someone else) sources. To use your support ef f ectively, you must elaborate upon the inf ormation, quotations, and examples taken f rom your sources and connect them to your thesis. It is also important to remember to cite the sources of the evidence and support you use in your paper. Structure of essay Incomplete. Ref er to the instructions and Health Writing and Ref erencing guide
- 13. QM QM QM Support Support Needed:<br>A well-written paper will include strong support f or its thesis. Support f or your thesis should come f rom primary (original documents, interviews, and personal experiences) and secondary (inf ormation that has been processed or interpreted by someone else) sources. To use your support ef f ectively, you must elaborate upon the inf ormation, quotations, and examples taken f rom your sources and connect them to your thesis. It is also important to remember to cite the sources of the evidence and support you use in your paper. Vague Unclear:<br>When making a point in one of your body paragraphs, one of the most common mistakes is to not of f er enough details. A paragraph without much detail will seem vague and sketchy. A paper is always strengthened when your claims are as specif ic as possible, The more detailed evidence you of f er, the more ref erence points your reader will have. Remember that you are communicating your argument to a reader who has only your description to go by. Someone who reads your essay will not automatically know what you mean to express, so you have to supply details, to show the reader what you mean, not just tell him or her. PAGE 7 PAGE 8 Improper Citation Improper citation:<br>Improperly cited material. Please use the link below to f ind links to inf ormation regarding specif ic citation styles: http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html PAGE 9 COMPONENTS OF THE ESSAY Annotated Bibliography: 3 articles have been chosen from the list provided. (1) Justification for your choice of sources: The chosen articles have been justified as relevant for the case study using 9 different sources from scholarly literature. (2) Recommendations for GRADING FORM: 1203NRS UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH GAYATHRI MUNIANDY 45
- 14. clinical practice supported from the same sources of scholarly literature. (2) 20 COMPREHENSION AND EVALUATION A high level response will provide: • Accurate discussion of the importance of the articles to the topic provided. (10) • All the annotations include accurate detailed descriptions of each article in a clear & consistent, succinct manner. (10) • Provide evidence of a deep understanding of each article’s conclusions from the research as described. (10) • Evaluation links all aspects including methodology, findings, conclusions, limitations of the topic. (10) • Use of scholarly literature appropriately to support the discussion. (5) - SELECTION OF LITERATURE A high level response will provide: Evidence of accurate comprehension of each article (6) Evidence of an exploration of the literature to justify the annotation. selections reflecting understanding of the clinical issue & its connection to your clinical practice. (6) The evidence based sources provided have been read, understood and annotated. (6) The justification of the selections and the recommendations demonstrate all relationship points between the topic and clinical practice. (6) Use of scholarly literature appropriately to support the discussion. (6) 3 Description of each article insufficiently summarised. Lack of understanding with articles ready demonstrated.
- 15. 13 4 PRESENTATION AND STRUCTURE A high level response will provide: The writing is clear and concise. (2) The annotations are clear & succinctly convey the key information about the source. (2) Conforms to the Health Writing and Referencing Guidelines.(2) Word limits for assessment items are strictly adhered to. (2) Essay is well presented, with correct spelling, grammar, with well-constructed sentence and paragraph structure. (2) REFERENCING Referencing as per APA Style 6th Edition.(4) Essay is supported with no fewer than 9 different sources from the scholarly literature & free of APA errors (4) Separate page for reference list. (2) 5 Strengths and justifications of selected article not discussed. Lack of scholarly evidence to justify annotation sections reflecting understanding of the clinical issue discussed. Writing is unclear and discussion is vague . Multiple grammatical and spelling errors found . At times, the writing is awkward and illogical making ti difficult to understand the student argument Some referencing and intext citation errors. Please refer to APA6th ed for referencing.
- 16. 25% SIMILARITY INDEX 19% INTERNET SOURCES 7% PUBLICATIONS 22% STUDENT PAPERS 1 14% 2 2% 3 2% 4 2% 5 2% 6 1% 7 <1% 8 <1% 9 AB case study ORIGINALITY REPORT PRIMARY SOURCES Submitted to Griffth University Student Paper Submitted to Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Student Paper Submitted to University of Sydney Student Paper Submitted to Chamberlain College of Nursing Student Paper Submitted to Australian Catholic University Student Paper onlinelibrary.wiley.com Internet Source jdc.jefferson.edu Internet Source pure.york.ac.uk Internet Source medicine.exeter.ac.uk
- 17. <1% 10 <1% Exclude quotes Of f Exclude bibliography Of f Exclude matches Of f Internet Source monash.edu Internet Source