Application Creep, Grush, Transport Futures 20150917JohnBern
This document discusses two potential paths for the development and deployment of autonomous vehicle technology: feature creep and application creep. Feature creep would involve incremental improvements to individual vehicles, leading to a growing private vehicle fleet and transportation inequities. Application creep would focus on using autonomous vehicles to improve public mobility options through shared, accessible robotic vehicles like shuttles, buses, and taxis. The document argues application creep could provide better mobility as a service, start benefits now, and reduce policy complexity compared to feature creep prolonging car ownership trends.
Micromobility Explorer - how to make it sustainableStéphane Schultz
We've spent several months browsing cities, meeting executives and studying usecases to understand what is hidden behind the micromobility frenzy. As urbanist and mobility experts, we have tried to figure out how to solve the main issues encountered by operators and cities. Hope you enjoy the ride ! It's only the beginning...
The document discusses how the original ITS technology developed over the past couple decades was exceptional for its time, but to keep transportation infrastructure current, governments and industries must support innovation rather than clinging to the past. It also notes that the 2005 San Francisco ITS World Congress marked the transition of ITS from research to being incorporated into transportation planning industry-wide. Advances in technology, data analytics, and connected vehicles now allow transportation systems to function more efficiently and predictively.
This report summarizes findings from a three-year collaboration between the World Economic Forum and The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) to explore how autonomous vehicles could reshape the future of urban mobility. The project built on the collective insights generated from the Autonomous and Urban Mobility Working Group (Working Group) of the System Initiative on Shaping the Future of Mobility, composed of roughly 35 business executives from diverse industries (including automotive, technology, logistics, insurance, utilities and infrastructure) that convened for 10 full-day workshops and numerous conference calls.
This document provides an initial perspective on autonomous vehicles by summarizing existing discussions. It notes that while connected vehicles are increasing, autonomous vehicles that can fully operate without human interaction are less developed. It also distinguishes between connected vehicles, which share information wirelessly, and autonomous vehicles. The document aims to capture current thinking on autonomous vehicles over the next 20-30 years to help guide policy and identify innovation priorities through an open foresight programme.
2017 Automotive Seating Presentation Package Michael Scheno
This package contains the expert presentations from Jeroen Lem, Vehicle Interior Technologies at Ford Motor Company, Peter Thomae, Commodity Buyer at Volkswagen of America and Jennifer Pelky, Sr. Engineer, Interior Safety and Crashworthiness, CPST at Toyota Technical Center.
Back in 2015, the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT), under the leadership of Secretary Anthony Foxx, has
leveraged nearly $350 million in public and private funds for smart city and advanced transportation technologies. Building on
Beyond Traffic 2045, the Smart City Challenge provided a spark for cities looking to revolutionize their transportation systems
to help improve people’s lives. Through the Smart City Challenge, the Department committed up to $40 million to one winning
city. In response, cities leveraged an additional $500 million in private and public funding to help make their Smart City visions
real. And, in October 2016, Secretary Foxx announced an additional $65 million in grants to support community-driven
advanced technology transportation projects in cities across America, including 4 of the finalists in the Smart City Challenge.
By challenging American cities to use emerging transportation technologies to address their most pressing problems, the
Smart City Challenge aimed to spread innovation through a mixture of competition, collaboration, and experimentation.
But the Smart City Challenge was about more than just technology. We called on mayors to define their most pressing
transportation problems and envision bold new solutions that could change the face of transportation in our cities by meeting
the needs of residents of all ages and abilities; and bridging the digital divide so that everyone, not just the tech-savvy, can be
connected to everything their city has to offer.
Application Creep, Grush, Transport Futures 20150917JohnBern
This document discusses two potential paths for the development and deployment of autonomous vehicle technology: feature creep and application creep. Feature creep would involve incremental improvements to individual vehicles, leading to a growing private vehicle fleet and transportation inequities. Application creep would focus on using autonomous vehicles to improve public mobility options through shared, accessible robotic vehicles like shuttles, buses, and taxis. The document argues application creep could provide better mobility as a service, start benefits now, and reduce policy complexity compared to feature creep prolonging car ownership trends.
Micromobility Explorer - how to make it sustainableStéphane Schultz
We've spent several months browsing cities, meeting executives and studying usecases to understand what is hidden behind the micromobility frenzy. As urbanist and mobility experts, we have tried to figure out how to solve the main issues encountered by operators and cities. Hope you enjoy the ride ! It's only the beginning...
The document discusses how the original ITS technology developed over the past couple decades was exceptional for its time, but to keep transportation infrastructure current, governments and industries must support innovation rather than clinging to the past. It also notes that the 2005 San Francisco ITS World Congress marked the transition of ITS from research to being incorporated into transportation planning industry-wide. Advances in technology, data analytics, and connected vehicles now allow transportation systems to function more efficiently and predictively.
This report summarizes findings from a three-year collaboration between the World Economic Forum and The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) to explore how autonomous vehicles could reshape the future of urban mobility. The project built on the collective insights generated from the Autonomous and Urban Mobility Working Group (Working Group) of the System Initiative on Shaping the Future of Mobility, composed of roughly 35 business executives from diverse industries (including automotive, technology, logistics, insurance, utilities and infrastructure) that convened for 10 full-day workshops and numerous conference calls.
This document provides an initial perspective on autonomous vehicles by summarizing existing discussions. It notes that while connected vehicles are increasing, autonomous vehicles that can fully operate without human interaction are less developed. It also distinguishes between connected vehicles, which share information wirelessly, and autonomous vehicles. The document aims to capture current thinking on autonomous vehicles over the next 20-30 years to help guide policy and identify innovation priorities through an open foresight programme.
2017 Automotive Seating Presentation Package Michael Scheno
This package contains the expert presentations from Jeroen Lem, Vehicle Interior Technologies at Ford Motor Company, Peter Thomae, Commodity Buyer at Volkswagen of America and Jennifer Pelky, Sr. Engineer, Interior Safety and Crashworthiness, CPST at Toyota Technical Center.
Back in 2015, the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT), under the leadership of Secretary Anthony Foxx, has
leveraged nearly $350 million in public and private funds for smart city and advanced transportation technologies. Building on
Beyond Traffic 2045, the Smart City Challenge provided a spark for cities looking to revolutionize their transportation systems
to help improve people’s lives. Through the Smart City Challenge, the Department committed up to $40 million to one winning
city. In response, cities leveraged an additional $500 million in private and public funding to help make their Smart City visions
real. And, in October 2016, Secretary Foxx announced an additional $65 million in grants to support community-driven
advanced technology transportation projects in cities across America, including 4 of the finalists in the Smart City Challenge.
By challenging American cities to use emerging transportation technologies to address their most pressing problems, the
Smart City Challenge aimed to spread innovation through a mixture of competition, collaboration, and experimentation.
But the Smart City Challenge was about more than just technology. We called on mayors to define their most pressing
transportation problems and envision bold new solutions that could change the face of transportation in our cities by meeting
the needs of residents of all ages and abilities; and bridging the digital divide so that everyone, not just the tech-savvy, can be
connected to everything their city has to offer.
This document is the November 2016 issue of Thinking Cities magazine. It contains articles on various topics related to smart and sustainable transportation in cities, including electric vehicles and infrastructure, autonomous vehicles, mobility solutions, and social and economic challenges. The issue features interviews with transportation leaders from cities such as Dubai, Rotterdam, La Rochelle, Jerusalem, and Trondheim.
ADOT Road to the Future Autonomous Vehicles Presentation 9/27/18Mark Goldstein
I was pleased to give the luncheon keynote at the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Road to the Future Conference titled "The Autonomous Revolution of Vehicles and Transportation" on 9/27/18 in Scottsdale, Arizona.
And for my recent presentation to the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Arizona with even more AV related details and depth see https://www.slideshare.net/markgirc/sae-arizona-autonomous-vehicles-irc-presentation-on-92018.
The future of autonomous vehicles 2019 Interim ReportFuture Agenda
There are great expectations around the future of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and equally much uncertainty. Some believe that AVs will transform safety and efficiency and are making significant investments in this area. Others are concerned that the technological developments are outpacing society’s ability to adapt, and there is an urgent requirement to develop better regulation before there is widespread deployment. A global Open Foresight project exploring the key issues for the future of AVs is being undertaken by Future Agenda. Expert workshops around the world are building the informed view.
This interim report shares the findings from the first five expert discussions in Los Angeles, Frankfurt, Singapore, Wellington and Melbourne. It highlights the emerging issues that are the source of major debate around the world. These include the impact of regulation; the ambition for less congestion; rethinking transport planning; the first/last mile challenge; the opportunities for automated freight and the need for more and better data sharing.
Future of Autonomous Vehicles
The dream of self-driving vehicles has been a long time coming. It is however now within reach and the pressure is on the deliver on the vision. With sustained technology development, increased investment and raising public awareness, there is enormous interest in the imminent mainstream use of autonomous vehicles on the streets.
Although approaches vary from around the world, policy makers and urban planners in leading locations are now seeking to collaborate more with manufacturers, mobility providers, tech suppliers, logistics operators in order to align regulation for testing and mass deployment. And it goes both ways.
The investments being made in autonomy have rapidly shifted from millions to billions, so unsurprisingly those public and private organisations that are providing the funds are keen to ensure that the ROI is credible. There is much to play for and, although there has been substantial progress over recent years, significant questions on safety, social impact, business models and performance are still unanswered.
The Future of Autonomous Vehicles project was undertaken to canvas the views of a wide range of experts from around the world in order to create a clearer, informed global perspective of how autonomy will evolve over the next decade. Beginning with a discussion with government officials just outside Shanghai in July 2018 and ending with leaders from across the US autonomous vehicle community in the hills above Silicon Valley in February of 2020, this project has covered a lot of ground. In all, eight workshops and six additional discussions have engaged with hundreds of different opinions, shared perspectives and built considered future pathways.
This report is a synthesis of many voices and opinions on the likely future of autonomous vehicles. We hope that is useful.
Full project details are available on the dedicated mini site www.futureautonomous.org
Mobility concepts of the Future / eCarTec Paris 04-2010ExtraEnergy France
Mobility concepts of the Future, or are they ?
How marketing and communication are polluting the developpement cycle of new mobility concepts and technologies introduction. Presentation by Gaetan BAYLE - ExtraEnergy France for eCarTec Paris conference 2010
Sidewalk Labs: Vision Section of RFP Submission (Toronto Quayside)Civic Tech Toronto
This document provides a vision for the Quayside neighborhood in Toronto as developed by Sidewalk Labs. It proposes Quayside as a testbed for urban innovation through the integration of physical and digital infrastructure. Key ideas include designing the neighborhood around people rather than cars, testing new approaches to housing, mobility and energy, and using data to continuously improve the neighborhood. The goal is for successful ideas in Quayside to be expanded across the Eastern Waterfront, addressing Toronto's challenges of equitable and sustainable growth while establishing it as a global leader in urban innovation.
How do we encourage people out of their cars and into more sustainable forms of mobility? Do we nudge people to reduce car use journey by journey, or do we enable people to give up their private cars altogether?
Ben will use Livework's 'designing at the right altitude model and behavioural change theories to explore how Mobility as a Service could enable significant change in the habits of citizens.
Introduction to Connected Cars and Autonomous VehiclesBill Harpley
This is the first of two lectures which were given to students and academic staff at the University of Portsmouth on March 28th 2017. It provides a broad overview of the technical and public policy challenges faced by the automotive industry.
Shared Mobility and Micromobility TodaySusan Shaheen
Shared mobility and micromobility services like bikesharing and scooter sharing are disrupting transportation. These services allow users to access various modes of transportation on an as-needed basis through smartphones. They provide numerous benefits but also challenges for cities to manage issues around parking, safety, and equity. Emerging dockless models are growing rapidly in use. Cities are implementing permitting processes to address local concerns while supporting innovative mobility options.
New transport technologies and solutions get a lot of press, but how can they help to make the towns and cities we live in better? Here, i explore the opportunities for applying placemaking principles to Mobility as a Service.
Nj future redevelopment forum 2019 lubinsky urban mobilityNew Jersey Future
This document discusses the future of urban mobility and transportation. It notes that transportation accounts for 30% of greenhouse gas emissions, with 90% coming from personal vehicles. New transportation technologies and business models like connected vehicles, electric vehicles, ridesharing, microtransit and autonomous vehicles are emerging. These could help reduce emissions and traffic if integrated into public transit systems. The document outlines three potential scenarios for the future: 1) a coordinated public-private autonomous vehicle ecosystem that complements transit; 2) increased private autonomous vehicle ownership without transit integration; and 3) unregulated private autonomous vehicle ownership without transit integration. It stresses the need for collaboration between government, industry and users to shape a sustainable, equitable and publicly accessible mobility future.
#cityfutures: Building a transport system for a sustainable future (Katja Ley...Northumbria University
The document discusses the engineering challenges of developing sustainable transport infrastructure for cities. It outlines six key building blocks needed: 1) a citywide plan created by politicians through policy and vision, 2) design planning by traffic planners, 3) urban planning by city planners, 4) highway design by road engineers, 5) traffic orders by traffic engineers, and 6) graphic design by communication experts. The document emphasizes the need for policies and infrastructure that prioritize walking, cycling, and public transit to address issues of emissions, public health, air quality, and climate change.
Vital Findings conducted this national study to understand current consumer perceptions and misconceptions of autonomous vehicles overall and by each level of autonomy.
Presented at Communication World, Munich
- Intelligent networking of different means of transportation play a central role.
- Mobile devices are growing strongly - in number as well as functionality, to provide the opportunity for new business models
- Companies need to develop a mobile strategy and address the new challenges on a broad basis
By Andreas Hein
This document describes MISTER, a proposed personal rapid transit (PRT) system that would function as both a public transit solution and a tourist attraction for cities. MISTER vehicles would travel individually on an elevated guideway at speeds up to 50 km/hr, connecting every location on demand without stops. It claims to solve problems of traffic, pollution and congestion in a more efficient manner than existing public transit or private vehicles. The system is depicted as environmentally friendly and a major attraction that could increase a city's economy. Details are provided on its inventor, prototype demonstrations, advantages over other PRT systems, and confirmation of feasibility from Polish academics.
It's no secret that technology is dramatically altering transportation in the modern world. But while big companies like Google, Tesla, and Uber get the headlines, there is a quiet revolution happening beneath the surface. Open source software and open data standards are expanding our access to information and creating new multi-modal mobility networks in the process.
Fiona Blackley from MMM Group gave a presentation on developments in car sharing markets and the future of mobility. She discussed how mobility management could aggregate transport options into a single system, provide personalized services, and integrate transport with user lifestyles. This would allow users to select the optimal mode for each trip and make life easier. Mobility management requires understanding user needs, incentivizing behavior change, and using technology to gain insights and provide tailored services.
Transportation Woes: Could Gangway Cars Cure Congestion?Thane Ritchie
1) Open gangway subway cars connect cars together like an accordion, allowing passengers to move freely between cars. This increases capacity and circulation compared to traditional cars connected by doors.
2) While open gangway cars were briefly tested in New York City in the 1920s-1960s, most trains today are 40+ years old. However, Hawaii and New York City plan to introduce new open gangway cars starting in 2018 and 2020 respectively to address congestion issues.
3) Proponents argue open gangway cars provide more space, are more energy efficient, and safer by preventing isolation, while critics note it may be difficult to locate sick passengers who could now be in any car. Whether these cars catch
I delivered an updated and expanded version of "The Autonomous Revolution of Vehicles and Transportation" to the Cloud Security Alliance Southwest Chapter & (ISC)2 Phoenix Chapter Joint Event on 10/16/18 in Tempe, Arizona.
A detailed overview of the transformation of transportation through autonomous vehicles and the advent of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) including enabling sensor and communication technologies as well as why Arizona is a hot bed for development and deployment plus a forward-looking view of markets and opportunities.
Delphi, a leading automotive supplier, drove an autonomous vehicle from San Francisco to New York over 3,400 miles to demonstrate the technology. It was the culmination of 15 years of development and aimed to show the technology works and gather real-world data. The PR campaign was very successful, generating significant media coverage and engagement. It helped establish Delphi as a thought leader in autonomous vehicles and provided benefits like employee engagement and recruitment.
Talk from /dev/summer
Brief overview of Simulatneous Localistion and Mapping incl. brief intro to localisation methods. Relates these methods to autonomous vehicles and touches on ethical concerns.
This document is the November 2016 issue of Thinking Cities magazine. It contains articles on various topics related to smart and sustainable transportation in cities, including electric vehicles and infrastructure, autonomous vehicles, mobility solutions, and social and economic challenges. The issue features interviews with transportation leaders from cities such as Dubai, Rotterdam, La Rochelle, Jerusalem, and Trondheim.
ADOT Road to the Future Autonomous Vehicles Presentation 9/27/18Mark Goldstein
I was pleased to give the luncheon keynote at the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Road to the Future Conference titled "The Autonomous Revolution of Vehicles and Transportation" on 9/27/18 in Scottsdale, Arizona.
And for my recent presentation to the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Arizona with even more AV related details and depth see https://www.slideshare.net/markgirc/sae-arizona-autonomous-vehicles-irc-presentation-on-92018.
The future of autonomous vehicles 2019 Interim ReportFuture Agenda
There are great expectations around the future of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and equally much uncertainty. Some believe that AVs will transform safety and efficiency and are making significant investments in this area. Others are concerned that the technological developments are outpacing society’s ability to adapt, and there is an urgent requirement to develop better regulation before there is widespread deployment. A global Open Foresight project exploring the key issues for the future of AVs is being undertaken by Future Agenda. Expert workshops around the world are building the informed view.
This interim report shares the findings from the first five expert discussions in Los Angeles, Frankfurt, Singapore, Wellington and Melbourne. It highlights the emerging issues that are the source of major debate around the world. These include the impact of regulation; the ambition for less congestion; rethinking transport planning; the first/last mile challenge; the opportunities for automated freight and the need for more and better data sharing.
Future of Autonomous Vehicles
The dream of self-driving vehicles has been a long time coming. It is however now within reach and the pressure is on the deliver on the vision. With sustained technology development, increased investment and raising public awareness, there is enormous interest in the imminent mainstream use of autonomous vehicles on the streets.
Although approaches vary from around the world, policy makers and urban planners in leading locations are now seeking to collaborate more with manufacturers, mobility providers, tech suppliers, logistics operators in order to align regulation for testing and mass deployment. And it goes both ways.
The investments being made in autonomy have rapidly shifted from millions to billions, so unsurprisingly those public and private organisations that are providing the funds are keen to ensure that the ROI is credible. There is much to play for and, although there has been substantial progress over recent years, significant questions on safety, social impact, business models and performance are still unanswered.
The Future of Autonomous Vehicles project was undertaken to canvas the views of a wide range of experts from around the world in order to create a clearer, informed global perspective of how autonomy will evolve over the next decade. Beginning with a discussion with government officials just outside Shanghai in July 2018 and ending with leaders from across the US autonomous vehicle community in the hills above Silicon Valley in February of 2020, this project has covered a lot of ground. In all, eight workshops and six additional discussions have engaged with hundreds of different opinions, shared perspectives and built considered future pathways.
This report is a synthesis of many voices and opinions on the likely future of autonomous vehicles. We hope that is useful.
Full project details are available on the dedicated mini site www.futureautonomous.org
Mobility concepts of the Future / eCarTec Paris 04-2010ExtraEnergy France
Mobility concepts of the Future, or are they ?
How marketing and communication are polluting the developpement cycle of new mobility concepts and technologies introduction. Presentation by Gaetan BAYLE - ExtraEnergy France for eCarTec Paris conference 2010
Sidewalk Labs: Vision Section of RFP Submission (Toronto Quayside)Civic Tech Toronto
This document provides a vision for the Quayside neighborhood in Toronto as developed by Sidewalk Labs. It proposes Quayside as a testbed for urban innovation through the integration of physical and digital infrastructure. Key ideas include designing the neighborhood around people rather than cars, testing new approaches to housing, mobility and energy, and using data to continuously improve the neighborhood. The goal is for successful ideas in Quayside to be expanded across the Eastern Waterfront, addressing Toronto's challenges of equitable and sustainable growth while establishing it as a global leader in urban innovation.
How do we encourage people out of their cars and into more sustainable forms of mobility? Do we nudge people to reduce car use journey by journey, or do we enable people to give up their private cars altogether?
Ben will use Livework's 'designing at the right altitude model and behavioural change theories to explore how Mobility as a Service could enable significant change in the habits of citizens.
Introduction to Connected Cars and Autonomous VehiclesBill Harpley
This is the first of two lectures which were given to students and academic staff at the University of Portsmouth on March 28th 2017. It provides a broad overview of the technical and public policy challenges faced by the automotive industry.
Shared Mobility and Micromobility TodaySusan Shaheen
Shared mobility and micromobility services like bikesharing and scooter sharing are disrupting transportation. These services allow users to access various modes of transportation on an as-needed basis through smartphones. They provide numerous benefits but also challenges for cities to manage issues around parking, safety, and equity. Emerging dockless models are growing rapidly in use. Cities are implementing permitting processes to address local concerns while supporting innovative mobility options.
New transport technologies and solutions get a lot of press, but how can they help to make the towns and cities we live in better? Here, i explore the opportunities for applying placemaking principles to Mobility as a Service.
Nj future redevelopment forum 2019 lubinsky urban mobilityNew Jersey Future
This document discusses the future of urban mobility and transportation. It notes that transportation accounts for 30% of greenhouse gas emissions, with 90% coming from personal vehicles. New transportation technologies and business models like connected vehicles, electric vehicles, ridesharing, microtransit and autonomous vehicles are emerging. These could help reduce emissions and traffic if integrated into public transit systems. The document outlines three potential scenarios for the future: 1) a coordinated public-private autonomous vehicle ecosystem that complements transit; 2) increased private autonomous vehicle ownership without transit integration; and 3) unregulated private autonomous vehicle ownership without transit integration. It stresses the need for collaboration between government, industry and users to shape a sustainable, equitable and publicly accessible mobility future.
#cityfutures: Building a transport system for a sustainable future (Katja Ley...Northumbria University
The document discusses the engineering challenges of developing sustainable transport infrastructure for cities. It outlines six key building blocks needed: 1) a citywide plan created by politicians through policy and vision, 2) design planning by traffic planners, 3) urban planning by city planners, 4) highway design by road engineers, 5) traffic orders by traffic engineers, and 6) graphic design by communication experts. The document emphasizes the need for policies and infrastructure that prioritize walking, cycling, and public transit to address issues of emissions, public health, air quality, and climate change.
Vital Findings conducted this national study to understand current consumer perceptions and misconceptions of autonomous vehicles overall and by each level of autonomy.
Presented at Communication World, Munich
- Intelligent networking of different means of transportation play a central role.
- Mobile devices are growing strongly - in number as well as functionality, to provide the opportunity for new business models
- Companies need to develop a mobile strategy and address the new challenges on a broad basis
By Andreas Hein
This document describes MISTER, a proposed personal rapid transit (PRT) system that would function as both a public transit solution and a tourist attraction for cities. MISTER vehicles would travel individually on an elevated guideway at speeds up to 50 km/hr, connecting every location on demand without stops. It claims to solve problems of traffic, pollution and congestion in a more efficient manner than existing public transit or private vehicles. The system is depicted as environmentally friendly and a major attraction that could increase a city's economy. Details are provided on its inventor, prototype demonstrations, advantages over other PRT systems, and confirmation of feasibility from Polish academics.
It's no secret that technology is dramatically altering transportation in the modern world. But while big companies like Google, Tesla, and Uber get the headlines, there is a quiet revolution happening beneath the surface. Open source software and open data standards are expanding our access to information and creating new multi-modal mobility networks in the process.
Fiona Blackley from MMM Group gave a presentation on developments in car sharing markets and the future of mobility. She discussed how mobility management could aggregate transport options into a single system, provide personalized services, and integrate transport with user lifestyles. This would allow users to select the optimal mode for each trip and make life easier. Mobility management requires understanding user needs, incentivizing behavior change, and using technology to gain insights and provide tailored services.
Transportation Woes: Could Gangway Cars Cure Congestion?Thane Ritchie
1) Open gangway subway cars connect cars together like an accordion, allowing passengers to move freely between cars. This increases capacity and circulation compared to traditional cars connected by doors.
2) While open gangway cars were briefly tested in New York City in the 1920s-1960s, most trains today are 40+ years old. However, Hawaii and New York City plan to introduce new open gangway cars starting in 2018 and 2020 respectively to address congestion issues.
3) Proponents argue open gangway cars provide more space, are more energy efficient, and safer by preventing isolation, while critics note it may be difficult to locate sick passengers who could now be in any car. Whether these cars catch
I delivered an updated and expanded version of "The Autonomous Revolution of Vehicles and Transportation" to the Cloud Security Alliance Southwest Chapter & (ISC)2 Phoenix Chapter Joint Event on 10/16/18 in Tempe, Arizona.
A detailed overview of the transformation of transportation through autonomous vehicles and the advent of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) including enabling sensor and communication technologies as well as why Arizona is a hot bed for development and deployment plus a forward-looking view of markets and opportunities.
Delphi, a leading automotive supplier, drove an autonomous vehicle from San Francisco to New York over 3,400 miles to demonstrate the technology. It was the culmination of 15 years of development and aimed to show the technology works and gather real-world data. The PR campaign was very successful, generating significant media coverage and engagement. It helped establish Delphi as a thought leader in autonomous vehicles and provided benefits like employee engagement and recruitment.
Talk from /dev/summer
Brief overview of Simulatneous Localistion and Mapping incl. brief intro to localisation methods. Relates these methods to autonomous vehicles and touches on ethical concerns.
Google Self Driving Cars
The Google Self-Driving Car is a project by Google that involves developing technology for autonomous cars. The software powering Google's cars is called Google Chauffeur. Lettering on the side of each car identifies it as a "self-driving car". The project is currently being led by Google engineer Sebastian Thrun, former director of the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory and co-inventor of Google Street View. Thrun's team at Stanford created the robotic vehicle Stanley which won the 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge and its US$2 million prize from the United States Department of Defense. The team developing the system consisted of 15 engineers working for Google, including Chris Urmson, Mike Montemerlo, and Anthony Levandowski who had worked on the DARPA Grand and Urban Challenges.
Legislation has been passed in four states and the District of Columbia allowing driverless cars. The U.S. state of Nevada passed a law on June 29, 2011, permitting the operation of autonomous cars in Nevada, after Google had been lobbying in that state for robotic car laws. The Nevada law went into effect on March 1, 2012, and the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles issued the first license for an autonomous car in May 2012, to a Toyota Prius modified with Google's experimental driverless technology. In April 2012, Florida became the second state to allow the testing of autonomous cars on public roads, and California became the third when Governor Jerry Brown signed the bill into law at Google HQ in Mountain View. In July 2014, the city of Coeur d'Alene, Idaho adopted a robotics ordinance that includes provisions to allow for self-driving cars.
Videos
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCLyNDhxwpqNe3UeEmGHl8g
This document provides an overview of self-driving cars, autonomous vehicles, and shared mobility. It discusses the major players in this emerging field such as Google, Tesla, Uber, and automotive manufacturers. The vision for autonomous vehicles is described as mobility over ownership where people will summon driverless vehicles via smartphone apps for on-demand transportation. Significant benefits include reduced traffic, increased road safety, and mobility for all groups. Currently, Google leads in developing fully autonomous vehicles while automakers focus on incremental self-driving features and plan to introduce them first in luxury models.
The document discusses Mercedes-Benz's efforts to advance autonomous driving technology beyond highways. It details a project where an S-Class vehicle autonomously drove the original 125-year old Bertha Benz route between Mannheim and Pforzheim with as few human interventions as possible. The goals were to gain experience with autonomous driving in regular traffic conditions and complex scenarios beyond highways using production-level sensors. Key challenges addressed included navigating intersections, dealing with pedestrians and cyclists, and handling unstructured environments. The system architecture and how the vehicle perceives, understands and responds to the driving scenario is also summarized.
2017 Autonomous Vehicle Presentation Package Michael Scheno
This exclusive package includes presentations by Annabel R. Chang, Director of Public Policy at Lyft, Glen DeVos, Vice President – Engineering at Delphi, and Sam Abuelsamid, Senior Research Analyst at Navigant Research.
City changemaker - Istanbul + Mobility workshop - March 28th '15Ronald Lenz
The workshop focused on improving mobility and transportation options in Istanbul through innovative uses of technology. Participants conducted observations of commuters and transportation systems to gain insights. They reframed conventional assumptions to craft a creative question around how social ridesharing could make transportation more convenient and enjoyable. The group envisioned an ideal scenario for 2020 where new transportation solutions in Istanbul provided affordable, green options through innovative uses of smart technology.
Commission on Travel Demand Shared Mobility Inquiry: Policy optionsCREDSUK
Evidence Session 4
16 July, Royal Automobile Club
The fourth evidence session covered both the context in which the shared mobility inquiry sits and the policy options which could be deployed to accelerate sharing and other wider initiatives which they might connect to.
Leveraging the Platform effect for citiesAlex Gluhak
Urban Data Talks #4 presentation by Alanus von Radecki, Deutsches Kompetenz Zentrum fuer Staedte und Region, outlining how effective collaboration with various cities and municipal companies can support the scaling of smart city use cases.
Vision on Smart Urban Mobility given during the AITPM conference in Sydney. Talk was about key elements needed to provide the urban transportation system for the future. See http://www.aitpm.com.au/Conference/Program/conference-home for the conference details.
Tonny Bosch presented on Planning and Design; Sketch of Future Developments at the City of [Bike] for City Seminar held in Istanbul, Turkey, on December 11, 2013. The Seminar was held as part of EMBARQ Turkey's BikeLab project. Bosch's presentation was given during Session 2 of the Seminar, "Planing and Design of Urban Bike Roads."
Congestion charging schemes implemented in cities like London, Stockholm, Milan, and Singapore have led to reductions in traffic, improved air quality, and generated substantial revenue for transportation infrastructure. These schemes involve charging drivers a fee for entering designated areas, usually city centers, during peak traffic hours. Evaluation of existing schemes found they reduced traffic by 15-30% and journey times by 15-35% while raising billions in revenue. Public acceptance of the schemes has also been positive as drivers adjusted and public transit availability increased. Revenues have funded improvements to roads, bridges, and public transit systems, transforming urban transportation networks.
This brochure describes the practical experiences of the cities’ introduction and extension of the usage of sharing schemes with traditional bicycles, electric bicycles as well as with electric and hybrid cars. Numerous advantages of sharing schemes are pointed out in the brochure. Besides saving money for the individual and improving the environment, the concept paves the way for multi-modal use of transport systems since the vehicle-sharing concept excels at high flexibility due to the independency of timetables and predetermined routes. Automated sharing systems can reliably be in operation year-round, day and night. Furthermore, the user freely chooses the fastest route to his destination not being bound to bus or train lines. In other words, a vehicle-sharing system adds customer value to the whole transport chain.
DYN@MO (2012-2016) is part of the CIVITAS Initiative, supporting cities to introduce ambitious transport measures and policies towards sustainable urban mobility.
Driverless cars have the potential to transform transportation by improving safety, reducing emissions and congestion, and increasing mobility. The UK is positioned to become a leader in this technology by establishing test programs in several cities and reviewing regulations in 2017. Fully autonomous vehicles could be on roads by 2020-2025, leading to major changes like decreased car ownership and the rise of driverless ride-sharing services. While this transition provides economic opportunities, it also threatens some existing jobs like professional drivers and presents new cybersecurity risks from hackers targeting connected vehicles.
This document provides an introduction to the topic of future streets and mobility technologies. It discusses the importance of understanding how past transportation technologies have shaped urban form and the need to ensure new technologies serve human-centric goals like health, equity and sustainability. The document outlines key findings, including that technology should not determine outcomes, the "interregnum" period as new technologies emerge is crucial for shaping the future, and greater integration is needed between urbanists and technologists. It also emphasizes the central role streets play as public spaces and how changes to streets can transform society.
City trucks, defined as ultra-light commercial vehicles under 3.5 tons, are projected to account for 59% of global light commercial vehicle sales by 2020. The global city truck market is forecast to grow at a 6.4% compound annual growth rate between 2014 and 2020. China is expected to become the largest city truck market, surpassing 2 million annual sales by 2020 and accounting for over half of global city truck sales. Urbanization and the development of urban logistics networks are driving increased demand for city trucks suited for narrow city streets and delivery operations.
This document discusses the concept of precinct parking stations to help manage parking demand in activity centers. It notes that while car parking takes up significant space in cities, parking is often unnoticed and planned separately from other land uses. The document advocates for a more integrated approach where parking is shared across developments through centralized parking stations located near activity centers. This could potentially reduce parking space needs by 20% compared to each land use providing its own parking. The document also discusses different policy options, delivery models, and case studies to illustrate how precinct parking stations have been implemented in other cities to support more sustainable urban development.
Sustainable Mobility in the City of BratislavaUNDP Eurasia
This document summarizes a project to promote sustainable transportation in Bratislava, Slovakia. The project aims to reduce CO2 emissions from road transportation by making private car use less attractive and promoting sustainable modes like public transit, biking, and carpooling. Specific initiatives include implementing new parking fees and enforcement to discourage long-term parking, prioritizing trams at intersections to reduce travel times, building new biking infrastructure, and launching a carpooling program. Lessons learned include the importance of strong local leadership, expertise from external advisors, careful monitoring of implementation, networking across groups, and establishing monitoring systems early.
Dave Brook, Senior Carsharing Consultant at team red U.S., discusses the evolution of car sharing and provides an overview of the efforts and experience of car shares with EVs in fleets in the U.S., Europe and worldwide, including the operational challenges and successes.
This presentation was featured at Drive Oregon's October 2016 monthly networking event. Learn more about us and our events at: www.driveoregon.org.
The first research to analyse the global shift from transportation to mobility.
Over 500+ pages, the report measures the combined impact of 12 mega-trends on the mobility ecosystem:
- 16 stakeholder categories
- 18 transport modes
- 18 regions
The report also includes 2018-2030 global mobility demand forecasts.
Commission on Travel Demand Shared Mobility Inquiry Evidence Session 2CREDSUK
The Commission on Travel Demand is an expert group established as part of CREDS (Centre for Research into Energy Demand Solutions) to explore how to reduce the energy and carbon emissions associated with transport.
Implementing ELDs or Electronic Logging Devices is slowly but surely becoming the norm in fleet management. Why? Well, integrating ELDs and associated connected vehicle solutions like fleet tracking devices lets businesses and their in-house fleet managers reap several benefits. Check out the post below to learn more.
Understanding Catalytic Converter Theft:
What is a Catalytic Converter?: Learn about the function of catalytic converters in vehicles and why they are targeted by thieves.
Why are They Stolen?: Discover the valuable metals inside catalytic converters (such as platinum, palladium, and rhodium) that make them attractive to criminals.
Steps to Prevent Catalytic Converter Theft:
Parking Strategies: Tips on where and how to park your vehicle to reduce the risk of theft, such as parking in well-lit areas or secure garages.
Protective Devices: Overview of various anti-theft devices available, including catalytic converter locks, shields, and alarms.
Etching and Marking: The benefits of etching your vehicle’s VIN on the catalytic converter or using a catalytic converter marking kit to make it traceable and less appealing to thieves.
Surveillance and Monitoring: Recommendations for using security cameras and motion-sensor lights to deter thieves.
Statistics and Insights:
Theft Rates by Borough: Analysis of data to determine which borough in NYC experiences the highest rate of catalytic converter thefts.
Recent Trends: Current trends and patterns in catalytic converter thefts to help you stay aware of emerging hotspots and tactics used by thieves.
Benefits of This Presentation:
Awareness: Increase your awareness about catalytic converter theft and its impact on vehicle owners.
Practical Tips: Gain actionable insights and tips to effectively prevent catalytic converter theft.
Local Insights: Understand the specific risks in different NYC boroughs, helping you take targeted preventive measures.
This presentation aims to equip you with the knowledge and tools needed to protect your vehicle from catalytic converter theft, ensuring you are prepared and proactive in safeguarding your property.
Expanding Access to Affordable At-Home EV Charging by Vanessa WarheitForth
Vanessa Warheit, Co-Founder of EV Charging for All, gave this presentation at the Forth Addressing The Challenges of Charging at Multi-Family Housing webinar on June 11, 2024.
EV Charging at MFH Properties by Whitaker JamiesonForth
Whitaker Jamieson, Senior Specialist at Forth, gave this presentation at the Forth Addressing The Challenges of Charging at Multi-Family Housing webinar on June 11, 2024.
Ever been troubled by the blinking sign and didn’t know what to do?
Here’s a handy guide to dashboard symbols so that you’ll never be confused again!
Save them for later and save the trouble!
What Could Be Behind Your Mercedes Sprinter's Power Loss on Uphill RoadsSprinter Gurus
Unlock the secrets behind your Mercedes Sprinter's uphill power loss with our comprehensive presentation. From fuel filter blockages to turbocharger troubles, we uncover the culprits and empower you to reclaim your vehicle's peak performance. Conquer every ascent with confidence and ensure a thrilling journey every time.
Welcome to ASP Cranes, your trusted partner for crane solutions in Raipur, Chhattisgarh! With years of experience and a commitment to excellence, we offer a comprehensive range of crane services tailored to meet your lifting and material handling needs.
At ASP Cranes, we understand the importance of reliable and efficient crane operations in various industries, from construction and manufacturing to logistics and infrastructure development. That's why we strive to deliver top-notch solutions that enhance productivity, safety, and cost-effectiveness for our clients.
Our services include:
Crane Rental: Whether you need a crawler crane for heavy lifting or a hydraulic crane for versatile operations, we have a diverse fleet of well-maintained cranes available for rent. Our rental options are flexible and can be customized to suit your project requirements.
Crane Sales: Looking to invest in a crane for your business? We offer a wide selection of new and used cranes from leading manufacturers, ensuring you find the perfect equipment to match your needs and budget.
Crane Maintenance and Repair: To ensure optimal performance and safety, regular maintenance and timely repairs are essential for cranes. Our team of skilled technicians provides comprehensive maintenance and repair services to keep your equipment running smoothly and minimize downtime.
Crane Operator Training: Proper training is crucial for safe and efficient crane operation. We offer specialized training programs conducted by certified instructors to equip operators with the skills and knowledge they need to handle cranes effectively.
Custom Solutions: We understand that every project is unique, which is why we offer custom crane solutions tailored to your specific requirements. Whether you need modifications, attachments, or specialized equipment, we can design and implement solutions that meet your needs.
At ASP Cranes, customer satisfaction is our top priority. We are dedicated to delivering reliable, cost-effective, and innovative crane solutions that exceed expectations. Contact us today to learn more about our services and how we can support your project in Raipur, Chhattisgarh, and beyond. Let ASP Cranes be your trusted partner for all your crane needs!
3. 3
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
Gdynia now
photo: Author 2014
4. 4
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
Personal Rapid Transit in Gdynia?
artist vision: Author 2014
5. 5
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
But does Gdynia need PRT?
Do other cities need it?
It depends:
• NO – if we consider new expensive infrastructure
• YES – if we consider use of existing infrastructure
• but transport automation brings new opportunities
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
6. 6
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
What are the conditions right now?
Car-centric development:
• which is justified by promising improvement of personal transport conditions
• but in reality the conditions are getting worse since the car invention
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
7. 7
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
What paradoxes & non-intuitive laws are related to this problem? Examples:
1. Jevons’ Efficiency Paradox— in relation to transport is e.g.: electric vehicles
users drive more, thus create bigger environmental impacts (Jevons WS
1866)
2. Braess’ Paradox— bigger or smaller congestion when, accordingly: adding
new or removing existing part of the road infrastructure (Braess D 1968)
3. Induced Traffic Demand— the more roads — the bigger traffic (Leeming JJ
1969)
4. Risk Compensation/Peltzman’s Effect— the more safe you feel — the
bigger risk emerge (Leeming JJ 1969; Peltzman S 1975)
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
8. 8
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
5. Downs-Thomson Paradox— investing in individual transport creates
additional traffic by reducing mass transit use (Thomson JM 1972; Downs A
1992)
6. Narrow lane safety— the narrower lane — the safer road, even without
reducing the capacity (Schwartz S 1988)
7. Lewis-Mogridge Position— traffic is growing to fulfil road capacity (Lewis D;
Mogridge MJH 1990)
8. Marchetti’s Constant— the average time travelled is constant for any mode
of transport, due to the different distances passed and scopes operated
(Marchetti C 1994)
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
9. 9
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
Examples of “traditional” car-centric viewpoints on automation:
• pushing for the creation of dedicated traffic lanes for autonomous
automobiles throughout the 225 km stretch of highway between Seattle and
Vancouver
• ideas of ultra-efficient (scary) automated V2V (vehicle to vehicle) & V2X
(vehicles to infrastructure) crossroads – green light for everybody at once
• free autonomous D2D rides (door to door) to shopping malls outside of the
city centre
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
10. 10
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
This is why we should distinguish technical & organizational solutions
of automated mobility such as AA-s, SV-s & DS-s
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
11. 11
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
I. What I understand by Autonomous/Automated Automobiles?
1. It is just an evolution of traditional 1,5 century old model of automobile
2. It still needs the driver (in the meaning of the owner) and steering wheel
3. It does not make any difference between other cars since newer cars have
already safety- and other kind of automation
4. Thus it is just marketing
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
12. 12
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
Examples for autonomous/automated automobiles:
• Tesla Model S (autopilot software update of an electric but traditional car)
• Mercedes F 015 (AA concept that is still focused on self-ownership or long-
term rent)
• Yanfeng AA (premiere 2017 – user interface presented 2016 in Frankfurt)
• Volvo, Ford, Chrysler, Nissan etc. are preparing their own AAs for the next
2-5 years (all major automotive producers will present AA until around 2020)
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
13. 13
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
II. What I understand by Self-driving Vehicles/Cars?
1. It is a revolution after 100 years of the same car model
2. It does not need the driver (no driving license needed) nor steering wheel
3. Thus the owner does not need to keep its belonging car with him/her
4. Actually the traveler does not need to own the car – he/she can use it as
todays taxi, ridesharing or car sharing services
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
14. 14
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
Examples for self-driving vehicles/cars:
• Google has been testing its self-driving car for example in Kirkland,
Washington
• Uber opened the first self-driving fleet in Pittsburgh, USA
• nuTonomy announced a partnership with South East Asia's largest ride-
hailing service, Grab, in order to further expand the reach of fleet of self-
driving vehicles
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
15. 15
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
III. What I understand by Driverless Shuttles/Pods/Podcars?
1. It fills the on-demand (OD) gap between taxi service and public transit
2. It allows to cover the first/last mile problem
3. It competes with walking and biking
4. But it complement public transit making it cheaper to maintain (no drivers)
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
16. 16
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
Examples for driverless shuttles/podcars:
• BestMile signs its first commercial project with CarPostal, the company
leading the sector of public transportation in Switzerland. This collaboration
between the EPFL spin-off and the subsidiary of the Swiss Post will allow to
operate driverless shuttles in urban areas
• Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) introduced two
innovations: partnering with transportation network companies (TNCs),
such as Uber and Lyft, to reach commuters in neighbourhoods big buses
cannot serve, and exploring driverless shuttles to solve first and last mile
issues to connect people to stations
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
17. 17
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
What future transportation problems do cities have to solve?
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
18. 18
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
We have stakeholders:
• Chaotic
• Monopolizing
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
19. 19
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
We need stakeholders:
• Cooperating
• Complementing
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
20. 20
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
How to solve the problem?
We need to implement Mobility as a Service (MaaS) paradigm
Why?
Because automation is a disruptive innovation that may have significant
negative side effects on functional, physical & socio-economic spatial structures,
as much as on transportation, including personal, group and mass public transit.
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
21. 21
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
What ways do cities can follow? – example of (automated) car-sharing
Source: Author 2016. Car-sharing: The Impact on Metropolitan Spatial Structures
22. 22
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
Examples of shared on-
demand rides on the city
theoretical model:
• Rideshare picks-up 2 or
more passengers on way
• Rideshare prolong it’s
route if its <1,4 length
• Rideshare is
complementing public
transit
Source: Author 2016
23. Thank you!
Piotr Marek Smolnicki
Contact Details
Gdansk University of Technology
Narutowicza 11/12 Street
80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
piotr.smolnicki@pg.gda.pl
http://www.civitas.eu
24. 26
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
Author’s chosen references
• Smolnicki PM 2016 “Mobility Oriented Development (MOD): Public-Private
Partnership in Urban Parking & Traffic Management with the Use of
Autonomous Automobiles, Car-sharing, Ridesharing Modes of Transport &
Mobility as a Service (MaaS)”. Springer: Happy City: eds Brdulak H, Brdulak A
• Smolnicki PM, Sołtys J 2016 “Car-sharing: The impact on metropolitan spatial
structures”
• Smolnicki PM, Sołtys J 2016 “Driverless Mobility: The Impact on Metropolitan
Spatial Structures”. Elsevier
• Netsch S, Junussova M, Kamrowska-Załuska D, Kiełbińska K, Roszkowska K,
Smolnicki PM 2014 “Rethinking the Water-City Interface: Gdynia and
Waterfront”
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
25. 27
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
References
1. Ackerman, E. (2016). Swiss Considering $3.4 Billion Cargo Tunnel
for Automated Delivery Trucks. Retrieved from
http://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-
think/transportation/infrastructure/swiss-considering-34-billion-cargo-
tunnel-for-automated-delivery-
trucks/?utm_source=carsthatthink&utm_medium=email&utm_campai
gn=0
2. Alessandrini, A. (2016). CityMobil2 Newsletter: Cities Demonstrating
Automated Road Passanger Transport (No. 7). Retrieved from
http://www.citymobil2.eu/en/upload/public-
docs/CityMobil2%20newsletter%207.pdf
3. Alexander, D., & Abuelsamid, S. (3Q 2015). Autonomous Vehicles:
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and the Evolution of Self-
Driving Functionality: Global Market Analysis and Forecasts.
Executive Summary (Research Report). Retrieved from Navigant
Consulting, Inc. website: http://www.navigantresearch.com
4. Almeida, R., Chin, R. C. C., Huang, A., Karaman, S., & Berlin, J. L.
(2016). Reimagine Mobility. Retrieved from http://optimusride.com/
5. Baloh, M., & Parent, M. (2003, December). Modeling and model
verification of an intelligent self-balancing two-wheeled vehicle for an
autonomous urban transportation system. In The Conference on
Computational Intelligence, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems.
6. Berman, B. (2015). Drivers Push Tesla’s Autopilot Beyond Its
Abilities: Tesla says its new Autopilot feature is not synonymous with
autonomous driving, but some drivers are acting like it is. Retrieved
from http://www.technologyreview.com/news/542651/drivers-push-
teslas-autopilot-beyond-its-abilities/
7. Bertoncello, M., & Wee, D. (2015). Ten ways autonomous driving
could redefine the automotive world. Retrieved from McKinsey &
Company website:
http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/automotive_and_assembly/ten_wa
ys_autonomous_driving_could_redefine_the_automotive_world
8. Bischoff, J., & Maciejewski, M. (2016). Simulation of City-wide
Replacement of Private Cars with Autonomous Taxis in Berlin.
Procedia Computer Science, 83, 237–244.
doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.121
9. Bridges, R. (2015). Driverless Car Revolution: Buy Mobility, Not Metal
(eBook Edition 1.10; Kindle Edition).
10. Campbell, A. (2015). Toward a driverless future with Commissioner
Bienkowska. Retrieved from
http://www.fiaregion1.com/en/fia_region_1/news/toward-a-driverless-
future-with-commissioner-bienkowska.htm
11. COMM/RTD. (2015a). Komisja Europejska : CORDIS : Wiadomości i
wydarzenia : Od inteligentnych do świadomych samochodów:
podejmowanie wyzwania autonomiczności. Bastiaan Krosse, Jeroen
Ploeg i Almie van Asten z dofinansowanego ze środków UE projektu
I-GAME przedstawiają swój projekt i możliwości wdrożenia
samochodów bez kierowców. Retrieved from
http://cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/123035_pl.html
12. COMM/RTD. (2015b). Komisja Europejska : CORDIS : Wiadomości i
wydarzenia : Bezpieczna i przystępna technologia otwiera drogę do
zautomatyzowanego transportu. Retrieved from
http://cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/123057_pl.html
13. COMM/RTD. (2015c). Komisja Europejska : CORDIS : Wiadomości i
wydarzenia : Terenowe docieranie się flot bez kierowców. Retrieved
from http://cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/123085_pl.html
14. Davies, A. (2015). Obviously Drivers Are Already Abusing Tesla’s
Autopilot. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2015/10/obviously-
drivers-are-already-abusing-teslas-autopilot/?mbid=social_fb
15. Easymile. Shared transportation for the last mile. Retrieved from
http://easymile.com/mobility-solution/
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
26. 28
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
16. Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for
autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy
recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and
Practice, 77, 167–181. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003
17. Fox, S. (2016). Planning for Density in a Driverless World. SSRN
Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2735148
18. Fraedrich, E., & Lenz, B. (2016a). Societal and Individual Acceptance
of Autonomous Driving. In M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, & H.
Winner (Eds.), Autonomous Driving (pp. 621–640). Berlin,
Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-
48847-8_29
19. Fraedrich, E., & Lenz, B. (2016b). Taking a Drive, Hitching a Ride:
Autonomous Driving and Car Usage. In M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B.
Lenz, & H. Winner (Eds.), Autonomous Driving (pp. 665–685). Berlin,
Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-
48847-8_31
20. Fraker, G. (2015, November). Technology Disrupting Mobility. MIT
Media Lab. Disrupting Mobility Summit, Media Lab Building,
Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from
https://youtu.be/GJ1w4gO6zqg?list=PLFPx70Od9XB71TyGyWw-
MwR-s6fAsKRl0
21. Gao, P., Hensley, R., & Zielke, A. (2014). A road map to the future for
the auto industry (McKinsey Quarterly). Retrieved from McKinsey &
Company website:
http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/manufacturing/a_road_map_to_the
_future_for_the_auto_industry
22. GE Look ahead. (2014). 3D printing will disrupt manufacturing: But
we will still need today’s model. Retrieved from
http://gelookahead.economist.com/3d-printing-will-disrupt-
manufacturing-2/
23. Gibbs, S. Could drone-guided robots replace refuse collectors?
Retrieved from
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/29/drone-guided-
robots-replace-binmen-volvo
24. BestMile. (2015). BestMile has signed its first commercial contract
with the major public transport operator in Switzerland | BestMile.
Retrieved from https://bestmile.com/2015/11/04/sion/
25. Grush, B., & Niles, J. Getting past the hype: What Gartner’s
Technology Hype Cycle teaches us about the autonomous vehicle.
thinkinghighways.com, 36–39. Retrieved from
http://endofdriving.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/What-
Gartner%E2%80%99s-Technology-Hype-Cycle-teaches-us-about-
the-autonomous-vehicle.pdf
26. Grush, B., & Niles, J. How Cities can use Autonomous Vehicles to
Increase Transit Ridership and Reduce Household Vehicle
Ownership.
27. Grush, B. & Niles, J. (2015). Manifesto for the End of Driving.
Retrieved from http://endofdriving.org/wp-
content/uploads/2015/07/End-Of-Driving-Manifesto-20150710-Draft-
3.pdf
28. Hanley, S. (2016). Autonomous Electric People Pods Coming To
European Cities This Year. Retrieved from
http://gas2.org/2016/03/20/autonomous-electric-people-pods-coming-
to-european-cities-this-year/
29. Hatalska, N. (2016). TrendBook 2016 (Hatalska.com). Gdańsk.
30. Heinrichs, D., & Cyganski, R. (2015). Automated Driving: How It
Could Enter Our Cities and How This Might Affect Our Mobility
Decisions. disP - The Planning Review, 51(2), 74–79.
doi:10.1080/02513625.2015.1064650
31. Hsu, J. (2 Feb2016). Driverless Dutch Bus Takes Passengers on
Public Test. Retrieved from http://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-
think/transportation/self-driving/driverless-dutch-bus-takes-
passengers-on-public-
test/?utm_source=carsthatthink&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign
=020316
32. Ingrassia, P., Sage, A., & Shepardson, D. (2016). From Here to
Autonomy: How Google is shaping the rules of the driverless road.
Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-
report/autos-driverless/
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
27. 29
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
33. (2016). Interview with Dimitris Papastergiou Mayor of Trikala
(Greece). In CityMobil2 Newsletter. Cities Demonstrating Automated
Road Passanger Transport (No. 7).
34. Klein, G. (2014). We Need to Think Bigger About Transit-Oriented
Development. Retrieved from
http://www.citylab.com/commute/2014/07/we-need-to-think-bigger-
about-transit-oriented-development/373838/
35. Lander, E. S., Holdren, J. P., Press, W., Savitz, M., Austin, W. M.,
Chyba, C.,. . . Predith, A. (2016). Technology and the Future of Cities
(Report to the President). Washington D.C. Retrieved from Executive
Office of the President; President’s Council of Advisors on Science
and Technology (PCAST) website:
http://static1.squarespace.com/static/537a1f91e4b0ccfe943c6bc6/t/5
6d9fb4101dbaec85ef39fa0/1457126210525/WhiteHouseReport.pdf
36. Levin, M. W., Li, T., Boyles, S. D., & Kockelman, K. A general
framework for modeling shared autonomous vehicles. Retrieved from
http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/kockelman/public_html/TRB16SAVF
ramework.pdf
37. Mui, C., & Carroll, P. B. (2013). Driverless Cars: Trillions Are Up For
Grabs (eBook; Kindle Edition) (Original work published March 2013).
38. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Preliminary
Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles. Retrieved from
http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/Automated_Vehicles_
Policy.pdf
39. Neckermann, L. (2015). The Mobility Revolution: Zero Emissions,
Zero Accidents, Zero Ownership (eBook; Kindle Edition): Matador.
40. O’Sullivan, F. (2015). U.K. City Is Designing a Future of Fewer Cars
— By Focusing on Its Roads: Densifying Milton Keynes thinks
autonomous pods, not trains, are the answer. Retrieved from
https://nextcity.org/features/view/driverless-cars-future-cities-milton-
keynes
41. O'Toole, R. (2016). Transit is dead. Let’s prepare for the next mobility
revolution. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-
theory/wp/2016/03/01/transit-is-dead-lets-prepare-for-the-next-
mobility-revolution/
42. Peters, A. (04.28.16). Driverless Buses Are Coming To Public-
Transit-Phobic Beverly Hills: A planned network of self-driving electric
shuttles will pick you up wherever, whenever you want. Retrieved
from http://www.fastcoexist.com/3059236/driverless-buses-are-
coming-to-public-transit-phobic-beverly-hills
43. Ratti, C., & Claudel, M. (2015). Full speed ahead: How the driverless
car could transform cities (Global Infrastructure Initiative). Retrieved
from McKinsey & Company website:
http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/sustainability/full_speed_ahead_ho
w_the_driverless_car_could_transform_cities
44. Renn, A. M. (2016). Self-driving cars will change more than just
traffic. Here’s why. Retrieved from
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/03/04/self-
driving-cars-will-change-more-than-just-traffic-heres-why/
45. S. W. (2015). Why autonomous and self-driving cars are not the
same. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-
explains/2015/07/economist-
explains?fsrc=scn%2Ffb%2Fwl%2Fee%2Fst%2Fautonomousselfdrivi
ngcarsexplainer
46. Schwartz, S. I. (2015). Street smart: The rise of cities and the fall of
cars (First edition; eBook; Kindle Edition). New York: Public Affairs.
47. Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART).
Future Urban Mobility (FM) IRG. Retrieved from
http://smart.mit.edu/research/future-urban-mobility/future-urban-
mobility.html
48. Smolnicki, P. M., & Sołtys, J. (2016). Driverless Mobility: The Impact
on Metropolitan Spatial Structures. Manuscript, Gdańsk.
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI
28. 30
AA vs. SV/SC vs. DS/DP – different impacts
49. Stupp, C. (2015). Autonomous driving takes back seat as connected
car rules prepared. Retrieved from
http://www.euractiv.com/sections/infosociety/autonomous-driving-
takes-back-seat-prep-work-eu-connected-car-law-gets-under
50. Sullivan, P. (2015). Getting Ready for Driverless Cars: Everything you
need to know to invest now in the companies developing the
technology that will revolutionize the way we commute (eBook; Kindle
Edition).
51. Tachet, R., Santi, P., Sobolevsky, S., Reyes-Castro, L. I., Frazzoli, E.,
Helbing, D., & Ratti, C. Revisiting street intersections using slot-
based systems.
52. Templeton, B. The Future of Mass/Public Transit. Retrieved from
http://www.templetons.com/brad/robocars/future-transit.html
53. Templeton, B. (2013). No, the car sharing aspect of robocars isn't as
exciting as people hope. Retrieved from http://ideas.4brad.com/no-
car-sharing-aspect-robocars-isnt-exciting-people-hope
54. Trulls, E., Murtra, A. C., Pérez‐Ibarz, J., Ferrer, G., Vasquez, D.,
Mirats‐Tur, J. M., & Sanfeliu, A. (2011). Autonomous navigation for
mobile service robots in urban pedestrian environments. Journal of
Field Robotics, 28. doi:10.1002/rob.20386
55. Upsetting the Apple car: The established carmakers, not tech firms,
will win the race to build the vehicles of the future. From the print
edition. (2015). Retrieved from
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21644149-established-
carmakers-not-tech-firms-will-win-race-build-vehicles
56. Volvo Car Group (Volvo). (2015). US urged to establish nationwide
Federal guidelines for autonomous driving. Press Release. Retrieved
from https://www.media.volvocars.com/global/en-
gb/media/pressreleases/167975/us-urged-to-establish-nationwide-
federal-guidelines-for-autonomous-driving
57. Wachenfeld, W., Winner, H., Gerdes, J. C., Lenz, B., Maurer, M.,
Beiker, S.,. . . Winkle, T. (2016). Use Cases for Autonomous Driving.
In M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, & H. Winner (Eds.), Autonomous
Driving (pp. 9–37). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_2
58. Wadud, Z. Self-Driving Cars: Will they reduce energy use? (Mobility
& Energy Futures Series).
59. Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D., & Leiby, P. (2016). Help or hindrance?:
The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles.
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 86, 1–18.
doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.001
60. Wagner, F. (2015). Technologietrends - Was steckt hinter »Industrie
4.0«, »IT-Sicherheit« oder »autonomen Systemen«?
(Technologievorsprung sichern). Stuttgart. Retrieved from Fraunhofer
IAO website:
http://www.rdm.iao.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/iao/rdm/de/documents/
01-Prof_Wagner-Technologietrends.pdf
61. Wallace, E. (2016). Driverless Cars. Retrieved from http://www.star-
telegram.com/cars/ed-wallace/article80123152.html
62. Warnecke, W., MacKenzie, D., & Surender, S. (2015, November).
The Future of Mobility: Is Personal Car Ownership a Thing of the
Past? Jenkins, J. EnergyChat Webinar,
63. Warren, T. (2016). This autonomous, 3D-printed bus starts giving
rides in Washington, DC today. Retrieved from
http://www.theverge.com/2016/6/16/11952072/local-motors-3d-
printed-self-driving-bus-washington-dc-launch
64. Wayner, P. C. (Kindle edition 2015; Printed edition 2015). Future
Ride v2: 99 Ways the Self-Driving, Autonomous Car Will Change
Everything from Buying Groceries to Teen Romance to Surviving a
Hurricane to … Home to Simply Getting From Here to There (Kindle
edition; 2 edition). Future Ride: Create Space Independent Publishing
Platform (Original work published Jul 8, 2013).
65. Why cars and cities are a bad match. Retrieved from
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-
theory/wp/2016/03/02/buses-and-trains-thats-what-will-solve-
congestion/
CIVITAS Forum 2016 • Sep 28th 2016 • Gdynia • Piotr Marek SMOLNICKI