The document discusses coal supply scenarios and challenges in India over the coming decade. It notes that while coal demand has grown at a CAGR of 7.33% between 2002-2012, supply has grown at a lower rate of 5.16%, leading to a widening gap. Key challenges include limited domestic reserves, transportation bottlenecks like inadequate rail infrastructure, and delays in operationalizing allocated coal blocks. To bridge the gap, companies are pursuing overseas coal asset acquisitions, but this presents challenges around resource nationalism in key supplier countries like Indonesia.

1. Coal Supply Scenario and Identification of Challenges

2. Present scenario for coal supply
Supply scenario for coal in the coming ten years
Imports and Acquisitions
Logistics Constraints
Port Infrastructure
Way Forward

3.  Coal Demand CAGR (2002-2012): 7.33 %
 Coal Supply CAGR (2002-2012): 5.16 %.
360
377
409 412
452
493
550
597
656
696
337
356
383
371
391
462
490
514 523
534
23 21 26
41
61
31
60
83
133
162
Demand
Supply
Gap
Million Tonnes
Source: CIL
379.5
403.7
431.3 431.3 435.8
CIL Production (in MT)
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
2010-11 2011-12
40.6 44.6 50.4 51.3 52.2
SCCL Production (in MT)
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
2010-11 2011-12
Source: SCCL

4. Sector Despatch in2010-11 (MT) % of Total
Despatches
Despatch in
2009-2010
% of Total
Despatches
Power 304.15 71.82 298.03 71.79
Steel 4.21 0.99 3.78 0.91
Cement 9.69 2.28 9.25 2.22
Fertilizer 2.78 0.65 2.61 0.62
Others 102.61 24.23 101.46 24.43
Total 423.44 100 415.14 100
Sector April-March,2011-12 ( in million tonnes) April- March, 2010-11
(in million tonnes)
Actual %
Achd.
Power 36.9 112 32.7
Cement plants 5.6 85 7.3
Captive power plants 2.8 73 3.2
Heavy Water Plant 0.4 83 0.5
Sponge Iron 1.1 51 1.5
Others 4.4 67 4.5
Total despatches 51.3 97 50.0
CIL dispatches
SCCL dispatches
Source: CIL/SCCL
Others includes Coal liquefaction and Industrial Processes

5. 2010-11(MT) 2011-12(MT) Growth over Previous Year(%)
Production 431.32 435.84 1.00
Offtake 424.5 432.53 1.90
Closing Stock 70 63 (10)
2010-11(MT) 2011-12(MT) Percentage of total coal production
Opencast 391.3 397.45 91.19
Underground 40.02 38.39 8.81
2010-11 (MT) 2011-12 (MT) % Growth
ECL 30.8 30.56 -0.78
BCCL 29 30.2 4.14
CCL 47.52 48.01 1.03
NCL 66.25 64.5 -2.64
WCL 43.65 43.51 -0.32
SECL 112.71 113.84 1.00
MCL 100.28 103.12 2.83
NEC 1.25 1.4 12.00
CIL 431.32 435.84 1.05 Source: CIL

6.  FSA’s worth 313 MT (post NCDP) and
120 MT (pre NCDP) currently under
process ( power sector only).
 Implementation of “ GO-NOGO “
category has lead to many projects
being stalled.
 The current stock with CIL is about 63
MT.
 The average number of rakes per day
was 168.7 in 2011-12 against 161.9 in
2010-11. Even then there was a
shortfall of about 20%.
 Coal movement by rail grew by 1 per
cent in 2008-09, 1.5 per cent in 2009-10
and in 2010-11 year by 2.6 per cent.
Source: CIL
Y E A R
PRODUCTION (Million Tonnes)
UNDERGROUND OPENCAST TOTAL
2010-11 11.6 39.7 51.3
2011-12 10.4 41.7 52.2
 SCCL has produced more than its target
estimates since the last 5 years.
 21 % of the production comes from
underground mines compared to a national
average of 11 %.
 SCCL had a better wagon availability growth
at a CAGR of 6% compared to CIL’s 4.3%.
 A total of 25 projects are under
implementation by SCCL. Projects with a
combined capacity of 41.27 MTPA

7. 3.4
5.4 6.9 7.6
10.1
12.8
21.2
25.726.9
Production- Power Sector (MT)
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Source: MoC
145
126
74
47
41 40
29 29
9
PurchaseofGR
MineApprovalPlan
EMPClearanceGranted
MiningLeaseObtained
ForestClearance
BlockstoPSUs
Productionstarted
LandAcq.Completed
PeakRatedCapacity
Source: Metis Research
 Out of a total of 218 Coal blocks that have been
allocated so far, 25 blocks have been de-
allocated by the Ministry of Coal till April 2012.
 Net allocated coal blocks are 195 with total
reserves of approximately 44.25 BT. (PIB, GoI)

8.  Around 58 Coal Blocks were stalled due to “Go/NoGo” categorization. 90 Coal
Blocks stand the risk of getting de-allocated.
 Delays in
◦ acquisition of land and associated problems of rehabilitation.
◦ due to adverse geo-mining condition.
◦ contract management issues.
 Allotment of blocks to organisations which do not have mining expertise.
 Allotment of blocks in joint venture ( in some case 8 parties are involved) causing
delays.
 Lack of proper technical information and funding sources.
 Allotment of blocks in naxal areas & areas with very less infrastructure
 Other misc. problems such as non-participation in tender, DGMS permissions.

10.  62 power projects were considered from 14 major power producing states.
 The projects that were analysed had all reached completion.
 The stages identified are:
◦ Start to Completion
◦ Environment Clearance/MoEF Clearance to Completion
◦ Land acquisition to completion
◦ Power Purchase Agreement Signing to completion
◦ Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) contractor finalization to
completion
◦ Financial Closure to Completion
◦ Fuel – Linkage Tie Up
• Part1: The projects were divided according to the states.
• Part2: The same above samples were then divided into government and
private sectors.
• The projects were divided into 4 different range of capacities.

11. Based on the Annual Report for 2010-11 of CIL/SCCL and
on-going projects and future projects, the production for a
particular year was derived up-to FY2016-17.
The CAGR for 2012-2017 was calculated for each
subsidiary and further projections up-to FY2021-
22 were made by taking CAGR of the period (2012-
2017).
Lack of data was a limitation for these projections as each type of data as
mentioned above was not available for each subsidiary. For example list of
future projects were not available for NEC and WCL and list of ongoing
projects were not available for NEC and BCCL. In such cases projections were
made with the available data.

12. 12443
13180
15111
13875
12315
15155
19480
18760
16580
15010
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Addition in 12th Five Year Plan – 66924 MW
Addition in 13th Five Year Plan – 84985 MW

13. Year 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
CIL 340.9 352.9 365.1 377.4 390.3 403.6 419.0 434.4 450.6 467.6
SCCL 38.4 40.4 42.4 44.6 46.9 49.3 51.8 54.4 57.2 60.1
MTPA 379.3 393.2 407.5 422.0 437.2 452.9 470.8 488.8 507.8 527.7
Projections for Coal Demand from Power Sector
2012-
2013
2013-
2014
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019
2019-
2020
2020-
2021
2021-
2022
Forecasted Capacity
Addition(MW)
12443 13180 15111 13875 12315. 15155 19480 18760 16580 15010
Coal(MT) (additonal
required)
45.5 48.2 55.3 50.7 45.0 55.4 71.3 68.6 60.6 54.9
Total coal required(MT) 498.5 546.7 602.0 652.7 697.8 753.2 824.5 893.1 953.7 1008.6

14. 2012-
2013
2013-
2014
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019
2019-
2020
2020-
2021
2021-
2022
Forecasted Capacity
Addition(MW)
12443.0 13180.0 15111.0 13875.0 12315.0 15155.0 19480.0 18760.0 16580.0 15010.0
Coal(MT) (additional
required)
45.5 48.2 55.3 50.7 45.0 55.4 71.3 68.6 60.6 54.9
Plants designed on coal
imports (MT)
1.6 11.7 4.4 5.1 26.6 14.4 14.3 10.6 11.1 13.3
Total coal required(MT) 498.5 546.7 602.0 652.7 697.8 753.2 824.5 893.1 953.7 1008.6
Total available (MT)
(Excluding Captive)
375.7 387.9 400.6 413.8 427.5 441.6 456.6 472.1 488.1 504.9
Captive Coal Supply 28.0 29.0 40.5 55.5 81.2 101.2 126.1 157.2 195.9 244.3
Gap to be met by
imports
96.4 141.5 165.3 188.5 215.7 224.8 256.0 274.4 280.8 272.8
•Current Coal based installed capacity
• Addition of about 66925 MW in the 12th year plan and addition of 84985 MW for the 13th year
plan.
• SECL is going to be the largest producer in the coming years followed by MCL.
• The supply-demand gap will increase which will have to be met by imports which are going to rise
at a CAGR 15.91 % over the next ten years.

16. Rising Demand-Supply Gap
Depleting
Reserves
Coal Quality
Transportation
Issues

17. Particulars
2012-
13
2013-
14
2014-
15
2015-
16
2016-
17
2017-
18
2018-
19
2019-
20
2020-
21
2021-
22
Power Cost for
Indigenous Coal
Rs. kWh 1.13 1.21 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.61 1.73 1.86 2 2.14
Power Cost for
Imported Coal
Rs. kWh 1.98 2.18 2.4 2.64 2.9 3.19 3.51 3.86 4.25 4.91
Pooled Price for
Indigenous &
Imported Coal
Rs. kWh 1.3 1.45 1.6 1.76 1.9 2.08 2.28 2.49 2.68 2.93
% age Increase
w.r.t. Indigenous
Coal
% 14.74 19.12 22.77 25.41 26.28 28.66 31.62 33.67 34.32 36.84
Domestic Coal Cost: Rs.1650/tonne
Domestic Coal GCV: 3700 kcal/kg
Indonesian Coal GCV: 5000 kcal/kg
SHR: 2383 kcal/kWh
Foreign Exchange Rate: Rs. 55/ $
Freight Rate: 13$/tonne

18.  Gives the surety of supply and can
securitize the energy needs of a nation.
 Huge reserves of unexplored coal But
coal asset acquisition can be tricky due
to its inherent risks.
 Demands heavy investment in
infrastructure and working in different
countries with different kind of
manpower.
 Quality of assets and its legality, land
acquisition and environmental
clearances and approvals are issues in
other nations as well.
 Indonesia: Low freight cost. Low labor
cost. High grade of coal. But high
moisture content, political risks,
underdeveloped infrastructure and
increasing domestic requirement
 Australia: Politically stable. Skilled
manpower with latest technology. But
high freight cost, expensive labor,
environmental compliance requirement
 South Africa: Low cost of labor as
compared to Australia. Large resource
base. But week rail infra and high
freight cost.
 Indonesia: Ban on coal exports below
5600 kcal/kg by 2014, Mining Export
Tax ( 25 percent on mining exports to
be raised to 50 % in 2013), Divestment
of 51% stake to Indonesian entities
 Australia: Mineral Resource Rent Tax,
Carbon Tax
 South Africa: Coal Beneficiation is
compulsory

19. Country Reserve Base Year of Deal
Essar Group Indonesia 64 MT 2010
US 200 MT 2010
Adani Group Australia 7.8 BT 2010
JSW US 123 MT 2010
Reliance Power Indonesia 2 BT 2010
GMR Indonesia 115 MT 2009
Tata Power Indonesia 2.9 BT 2010
Lanco Infratech Australia 1.1 BT 2010
Gujarat NRE Coke Australia 550 MT 2005
New Zealand 15 BT 2006
Bhushan Steel Australia n/a 2007
GVK Power and Infrastructure Australia 8 BT 2011
Indonesia 1.5 BT Deal Under Consideration
Coal India Limited US 2.3 BT Deal Under Consideration
Australia 9 BT Deal Under Consideration
Indonesia n/a Deal Under Consideration
NTPC Indonesia 1.8 BT Deal Under Consideration
Australia 720 MT 2010
South Africa 1 BT Deal Under Consideration
Source: Metis Research

21. Mode 2010-11 2009-10 Growth
Absolute %
Railways 215.81 210.37 5.44 2.6
Road 112.35 105.63 6.72 6.4
Merry-Go-Round 83.62 86.58 (2.96) (3.4)
Others 11.66 12.56 (0.90) (7.2)
Total 423.44 415.14 8.30 2.0
Mode 2010-11 2011-12 Growth
Absolute %
Rail 277.07 269.54 (7.53) (2.72)
Road 95.99 105 9.01 9.39
Merry-Go-Round 96.66 102.99 6.33 6.55
Others 31.17 37.51 6.34 20.34
Total 501.44 515.04 13.6 2.71
Dispatches by SCCL
Source: CIL/SCCL Annual Reports

22. Road Network
0
9.9
14.6
7.4
5.3
14.6
9.1
2.1 1.9
0
2.9
0.6
5.1
4.2
Freight Traffic CAGR
National Highways CAGR
 National Highways: 70548 kms / State
Highways: 131899 kms
 Currently over 22 % of the national
highways are four-laned while only 2%
of the state highways are four-laned.
59% of national highways are two
laned.
 Road freight traffic has increased at a
CAGR of 11.01% from 1950-51 to
2010-11.
 The investments made in the 10th Five
Year Plan were Rs. 1271 billion while
that in the 11th Five Year Plan were Rs.
2786 billion. Of the Rs. 2786 billion, 51
% came from the state government,
32.6 % from the central government
and 16.5 % from the private sector.
Source: India Infrastructure

23.  Lack of last mile connectivity to coal mines.
 Investment skewed towards government sector.
 Highly fragmented and unorganized sector with too many players
 Lack of barrier free movement and high stoppage time at toll-booths results
in shorter distances being covered. A truck covers on an average 250-400
kms in India while is covers 700-800 kms in developed countries. (Source:
Metis Research)
 Time consuming and risk of pilferage.
 5-15 % of the truck fleet lying idle. (Source: Metis Research)
 Due to an increase in fuel price, less supply of truck and variability in
demand, freight rates have considerably increased.

25. Indian Railways is the largest passenger and fourth
largest freight carrier in the world. The Indian
Railways carries about 35 % of the freight traffic in
India.
Indian Railways runs 18518 trains per day (as of
June 2011) out of which 7845 are goods trains.
Between 2007 and 2011 Indian Railways has
managed to add 1472 km of new lines, 4465 km
gauge conversion and 2006 km of doublings.
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 CAGR
Coal Freight(MT) 313.33 338.30 369.10 396.10 420.21 7.61
Coal (for power plants)
(MT)
- - - 271.45 285.52 -
Total Rail Freight (MT) 727.75 793.00 833.31 887.99 921.51 16.40
Coal Freight by rail as a
% of Total Rail Freight
43.05 42.66 44.29 44.61 45.60 -
Railway 2011-12 (MT) 2012-13( MT)
South East
Central
150.73 158
East Coast 120.77 130
South Eastern 117.01 118.3
South Central 103.17 111.5
East Central 94.68 102
Source: Ministry of Railway

26.  Coal India’s production growth CAGR of 5.3%, wagon availability growth was just
2.6%. At SCCL, it was much better, with production CAGR of 4.3% and wagon
availability CAGR of 6% ( 2001-2011)
 Indian Railways acquired 15400 and 16638 wagons in 2009-10 and 2010-11
respectively. About 18000 wagons were planned to be purchased in 2011-12.
 According to India Infrastructure order of as many as 12000 wagons were pending
with private firms as on March 31, 2011.
 The average freight carrying capacity in India is 3376 tonnes/rake while that in US
and Australia it is 12500 tonnes/rake and 9600 tones per rake respectively.
Saturated
Corridors
Service
Quality
Low speed
of freight
trains
Low level of
technology
integration
Slow pace of
private
participation
Source: Metis Research

28. Traffic Handled at Indian Ports (Million Tonnes)
Major/Non- Major Ports
Traffic Handled Growth over previous year/period
2009-10 2010-11
2009-
10
2010-
11
Major Ports
561.0
(66.01)
569.9
(64.43)
5.7 1.6
Non-Major
Ports
288.9
(33.99)
314.6
(35.57)
35.5 8.9
All Ports
850.0
(100.00)
884.5
(100.00)
14.2 4.1
Commodity-wise Traffic Handled at Major Ports
(Million Tonnes)
Commodity 2009-10 2010-11
POL
Iron Ore
Fertiliser
a. Finished
B. Raw
Coal
a. Thermal Coal
b.Coking Coal
Container
Others
175.0
100.3
17.7
10.9
6.7
71.7
43.3
28.3
101.2
95.0
180.3
873.0
20.0
12.4
7.6
72.7
44.2
28.4
114.0
95.4
Total 561.0 569.9
Commodity-wise Traffic Handled by Non-Major Ports
Commodity
GROUP
Traffic Handled (Million
Tonnes)
% Change over
Previous Period
2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 2010-11
POL
137.7
(47.66)
153.4
(48.78)
40.79 11.45
Iron Ore
48.8
(16.89)
42.4
(13.51)
36.11 12.94
Building
Material
13.1
(4.55)
14.1
(4.50)
0.88 7.67
Coal
41.2
(14.29)
58.5
(18.60)
92.37 41.79
Fertilizer
9.5
(3.29)
10.9
(3.49)
7.30 15.61
Others
38.4
(13.32)
35.0
(11.12)
6.99 9.05
Total
288.9
(100)
314.6
(100)
35.51 8.90
Others includes aluminia, bauxite, other minerals, agribulks, etc.

29.  3.1% increase in cargo at major ports during the
first half of 2011-12 due to following increases
viz. 18.5% thermal coal, 11.4% in Fertilizer Raw
material, 8.4% in containers & 7.3% in other
cargo.
 Non-major ports saw a growth of 8.9 % in 2010-
11 mainly driver by increase in coal imports
which grew at a rate of 41 %.
 Presently, over 75% of the coal traffic is
concentrated along the east coast as a result of
the location of both mining centers and steel
making capacity in the east.
Capacity
Utilisation at
Ports
Year
Traffic
Handled
(In million
tonnes)
Capacity
(in million
tonnes)
Percent
Utilisation
(%)
2000-01 281.1 291.45 96.44
2005-06 423.57 456.2 92.85
2006-07 463.78 504.75 91.88
2007-08 519.31 532.07 97.6
2008-09 530.53 574.77 92.3
2009-10 561.09 616.73 90.98
40
44 44
25 27 27
463
530 561.
2008 2009 2010
Coal Traffic vs All Traffic (MT)
Coal(coking) Coal (thermal) All Traffic
Source:Ministry of Shipping

30. in million tonnes
Traffic Capacity
PORT 2016-
2017
2019-
2020
2016-
2017
2019-
2020
Kolkata 17.5 20.95 19 21
Haldia 28.5 31 33.5 38
Paradip 28 30 32.5 32.5
Vishakhapatnam 18.5 27.5 26.44 33.94
Ennore 34 38 34 34
Chennai - - - -
Tuticorin 26.38 29.91 28.75 35.75
Cochin 0.5 0.5 - -
New Mangalore 8.5 11.4 11.4 11.4
Mormugoa 10 11.5 11 11
Mumbai 7 7 - -
JNPT - - - -
Kandla 12.36 15.72 - -
Port Blair - - - -
Total 191.24 223.48 196.59 217.59
• The traffic of major ports are
expected to reach to the level of
1031.518 million tonnes by end of
2016-17 and 1214.820 million
tonnes in 2019-20.
• Coal traffic handled at non-major
ports is likely to grow at a CAGR of
28.1%, from 20.8 million tonnes in
2008-09 to 71.9 million tonnes in
2013-14.
• Coal traffic at major ports may get
reduced by 4%, from 71.1 million
tonnes to 58 million tonnes during
the same period above.
Source: Maritime Agenda

31. PORT
Crane Productivity
for small berth
vessels (TEU)
Berth Productivity
for small vessels
(TEU)
Crane productivity
for large vessels
(TEU)
Berth Productivity
for large vessels
(TEU)
Singapore 23 45 36 140
Port Rashid and
Jabel Ali (UAE)
22 40 30 110
Khor-Fakkan
Fujairah (UAE)
20 32 28 100
Salalah (Oman) n/a n/a 29 90
Aden (Yemen) n/a n/a 28 70
India
NSICT 18 30 22 40
JNPT 16 24 20 36
Tuticorin 14 14 - -
International
Standards
- - 27-33 -
Source: Maritime Agenda

32. JNPT Singapore Port
Source: Maritime Agenda

35.  Need for coal regulator.
 Implementation of Competitive Bidding
should help in further development of
coal blocks.
 Rapid clearances of land and forest and
reducing the delay in implementation of
projects after necessary approvals.
 Auctioning based on maximum
proposed production.
 In case of a consortium of companies,
only serious players should be allowed
to collaborate.
 Providing incentives to companies
taking up clean coal technologies.
 Coal beneficiation & Modernization of
aging infrastructure.
 Renewed Focus on Underground Mining
 Deep Opencast Mining ( Depth 500 m)
 Use of better technology and drilling
equipment
 More exploration activities need to be
done to identify higher grades of coal
 Preference of mine allotment through
bidding and to whose with mass
production technologies
 Shortage of skilled mining engineers and
technologists.

36.  CIL is far behind in meeting the
commitments made in terms of linkages
to various customers. CIL imports will
rise in future if the current production
trend persists.
 Will the NCDP ensure the supply of coal
??
 CIL needs to clear its huge number of
delayed projects if it wants to meet the
customer requirements in the future.
 Reopening of abandoned mines.
 Global Coal Asset Acquisition by CIL.
 Coal gasification and Extraction of coal
bed methane.
 SCCL Planning to take up development
of between six to eight underground
coal-mining projects through a revenue
sharing agreements with contract
miners.
 Increase total coal production by 2-
million ton to 53-million ton in next 5-10
years.
 Improve profitability from underground
coal mine projects was through higher
productivity by greater adoption of
longwall technology in the new projects.

37.  Imported coal will be a crucial mode of fuel for India.
 Indonesia and Australia would be our major exporters.
 Single company to import coal.
 Acquire long term supply agreements rather than short term agreements for
imported coal.
 Due to the tough competition for imported coal, acquisitions/strategic buyouts will
have to be made but only after due diligence has been made in all related aspects.
 The economies of scale and the trade-off between the price and quality will bring
parity between the imported coal prices and the domestic coal thus bringing
competitiveness.
 Keeping domestic production growing in order to keep the reliability on imported
coal in check if not reduce it.

38. Road Network
 The planning commission has estimated that around Rs. 4903 billion will be required
for the road sector under the 12th Five Year Plan.
 Better information availability, uniform tolling technology, rationalization of tax
structure and bring the entire segment under a single authority.
 Implementation of Information Technology for Surface Transport (Electronic
monitoring, Management and regulation of Vehicles and Driver Licenses)
Rail Network
 CIL’s three railway infrastructure projects are stuck and need fast clearances.
 Introduction of new wagons, movement of rakes during night
 Better information sharing between the railways and the coal producers.
 Rapid clearances of new projects for tracks leading to coal mines.
 The Ministry of Railways has aimed a freight share of 50 % by 2020. With this in mind
infrastructure development through projects like DFC and National Rail Vikas Yojna
have been planned to boost the rail segment.

39. Capacity Creation
Adequate Drafts
Massive
Mechanization
Development of
adequate Storage
Areas
Hinterland
Connectivity
Cost Efficiency
Indian Maritime
Cadre & Pilots
Pool

40. Thank You.

41.  Net Sales of 62415 Crores in FY 2011-12.
 Total expenses 48716 Crores.
 Registered a net profit of Rs. 14775 crores ( increase of 36 % over the
previous years net profit of Rs. 10860 crores) FY2011-12.
 Net worth of Rs. 40453 Crores as on 31.3.2012 ( an increase of 21 % over
previous year).

42. SCHEME
XI Plan Period
2007- 08 2008- 09 2009- 10 2010- 11 2011- 12 Total
Existing Mines 13.95 13.40 13.38 13.58 14.22 68.52
Completed Projects 133.93 125.40 88.06 73.24 64.10 484.72
On-Going Projects 167.28 71.27 18.63 17.75 28.47 303.40
New Projects 205.43 395.23 400.50 467.51 725.00 2193.67
Total Mining 520.58 605.30 520.57 572.07 831.78 3050.30
Non-mining projects 50.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 290.00
Total 570.58 665.30 580.57 632.07 891.78 3340.30

43. 307.92 332.4 362.93 380.13 442 453
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 (As per
CEA)#
Demand for Coal(MT)
278 281 302 355 367 387 417
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12*
Coal Consumption(includes imports)(MT)
Source: CEA
India imported 27.9 MT for indigenous coal based projects in 2011-12.

44. Purchase of
Geological
Report
Approval of
Mine Plan
Application for
EMP Clearance
Obtaining
Mining Lease
Application of
Forest
Clearance
Mining Lease
Application
Submission of
Mine Plan
Grant of Forest
Clearance
Application of
Land
Acquisition
Completion of
Land
Acquisition
Application for
Coal Controllers
Permission
Prior Approval
for Coal
Production
Coal Production

45.  Governing Bodies: Ministry of Coal,
Ministry of Environment & Forests and
Ministry of Mines
 Major Industry Participants: Central
Sector Mining Companies, State Mining
Companies, Private Mine. Private
players can produce coal but only for
their own consumption.
 3rd Largest Producer of Coal
 8% of World Production and
Consumption
 CIL has the monopoly in coal production
with 80 % market share. SCCL is the
second major coal produce with 10 %
market share.
Coal
56%
Gas
9%
Oil
1%
Hydro
19%
Nuclear
2%
Wind
9%
Solar
1%
Others
3%
Fuel Energy
Generated (MW)
Coal 113782
Gas 18381
Oil 1199.75
Hydro 38990
Nuclear 4780
Wind 17644
Solar 1030
Other (BG,BP) 5829

46. 0.17
1.02
3.24
0.05
0.61
16.06
3.08
14.37
0.35
0.88
2.39
0.05
0.69
18.74
4.09
15.89
0.65
0.54
6.07
0.10
0.76
19.52
0.55
20.70
0.54
1.22
7.09
0.44
0.84
28.77
0.52
19.59
1.11
1.40
14.49
0.15
1.06
32.17
0.04
22.39
Others USA South
Africa
Russia New
Zealand
Indonesia China Australia
Country wise Coal Imports to India (All figures in MT)
FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010
Source: Metis Research