Powerpoint
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
2 likes•2,250 views
This document discusses Communication Privacy Management Theory, which focuses on how people manage private information and disclosure in relationships. It provides an overview of the theory's evolution over time from focusing on married couples to broader groups. It outlines assumptions of the theory, such as that people make choices and rules about disclosure based on themselves and others. The document also discusses critiques of the theory and provides a personal example of feeling a loss of control over private information.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Communication privacy management theory_day
Communication privacy management theory explains how people choose what private information to reveal or conceal based on their environment and relationships. It describes how people gradually disclose more personal details over the course of building trust with others like in new romantic relationships. The theory is applicable to many contexts like health, family, and social media, but there is debate around whether it truly qualifies as a dialectic theory. As a new theory, more research can still be conducted on communication privacy management.
Communication Privacy Management Theory (CPM)
Communication Privacy Management (CPM) Theory proposes a framework for understanding how people decide to disclose or conceal private information. It contains three main parts: privacy ownership of information only known to oneself, privacy control in deciding to share information with others, and privacy turbulence when privacy management does not go as expected. The theory addresses the tension between disclosure and privacy, known as the disclosure-privacy dialectic. It also outlines five principles of disclosure: that people own private information, have boundaries around it, control it through rules, and have ownership over it. CPM Theory aims to understand how people balance disclosure and privacy in relationships.
Communication Privacy Management Theory
Communication privacy management theory discusses the dialectal tension surrounding private information in families, healthcare, and social media. In families, privacy issues include regulating internet use and relationships with step-families after divorce. Patients may feel insecure sharing private medical information with doctors, who are responsible for keeping it confidential. On social media, people can choose what private information they wish to share.
Communication Privacy Management Theory
Presentasi Communication Privacy Management Theory oleh Nabila Ashriyanti Mankom A Fikom Unpad
Aqilah nafisah ulya communication privacy management
Dokumen tersebut membahas tentang latar belakang Teori Manajemen Privasi Komunikasi (CPM) yang dikembangkan oleh Sandra Petronio. CPM menjelaskan proses yang digunakan oleh individu untuk mengelola informasi pribadi dan membagikannya dengan orang lain. Teori ini didasarkan pada beberapa asumsi kunci seperti informasi pribadi, batasan pribadi, kontrol, dan sistem manajemen berdasarkan aturan.
Chapter 13 ppt (communication privacy management theory)
Teori Manajemen Privasi Komunikasi (CPM) menjelaskan proses pengelolaan informasi pribadi dan batasan antara publik dan privat dalam hubungan. CPM berargumen bahwa individu secara aktif membuat aturan untuk mengontrol siapa yang dapat mengakses informasi pribadi mereka dan bagaimana informasi itu dibagikan, serta terus menyesuaikan batasan tersebut seiring perubahan dalam hubungan.
Comm201_Presentation_Chappell
Communication privacy management theory (CPM) states that individuals have ownership over their private information and establish boundaries to control what is concealed or revealed. According to CPM, people create and follow privacy rules to determine how and when to disclose private information to others. CPM has five core principles and provides guidance for revealing or concealing information, especially regarding difficult topics like child abuse, sexual orientation, death, and infidelity. While CPM helps address tensions between privacy and intimacy, it has been criticized for not explaining how to repair breaches in privacy boundaries between individuals.
“You Need to Back Off”: Utilizing Communication Privacy Management Theory to ...
“You Need to Back Off”: Utilizing Communication Privacy Management Theory to ...West Virginia University - Department of Communication Studies
ABSTRACT: One of the most interesting features of social media sites is that they provide both private and public contexts in which to share messages. Studies have suggested that people perceive interpersonal messages differently based on this characteristic, but less is known about how people may intend to respond to messages based on their access exclusivity. Building upon a previous study in this area, the current study examined people’s responses to a hypothetical situation in which they received a negative interpersonal disclosure of varying intensity either publicly or privately through Facebook. Data suggest that privately-disclosed messages elicited more uncertainty and more uncertainty reduction behaviors. Publicly-disclosed messages caused recipients to feel more offended about the content, express privacy violation concerns, and delete the offending content. These findings are discussed for their theoretical value, and limitations and directions for future research are as well.
Goldman, Z., Bowman, N. D., & Westerman, D. (2013, April).“You need to back off:” Utilizing communication privacy management theory to explore responses to public and private interpersonal disclosures on Facebook. Paper presented at the Broadcast Education Association Research Symposium “Media and Social Life: The Self, Relationships, and Society,” Las Vegas. Recommended
Communication privacy management theory_day
Communication privacy management theory explains how people choose what private information to reveal or conceal based on their environment and relationships. It describes how people gradually disclose more personal details over the course of building trust with others like in new romantic relationships. The theory is applicable to many contexts like health, family, and social media, but there is debate around whether it truly qualifies as a dialectic theory. As a new theory, more research can still be conducted on communication privacy management.
Communication Privacy Management Theory (CPM)
Communication Privacy Management (CPM) Theory proposes a framework for understanding how people decide to disclose or conceal private information. It contains three main parts: privacy ownership of information only known to oneself, privacy control in deciding to share information with others, and privacy turbulence when privacy management does not go as expected. The theory addresses the tension between disclosure and privacy, known as the disclosure-privacy dialectic. It also outlines five principles of disclosure: that people own private information, have boundaries around it, control it through rules, and have ownership over it. CPM Theory aims to understand how people balance disclosure and privacy in relationships.
Communication Privacy Management Theory
Communication privacy management theory discusses the dialectal tension surrounding private information in families, healthcare, and social media. In families, privacy issues include regulating internet use and relationships with step-families after divorce. Patients may feel insecure sharing private medical information with doctors, who are responsible for keeping it confidential. On social media, people can choose what private information they wish to share.
Communication Privacy Management Theory
Presentasi Communication Privacy Management Theory oleh Nabila Ashriyanti Mankom A Fikom Unpad
Aqilah nafisah ulya communication privacy management
Dokumen tersebut membahas tentang latar belakang Teori Manajemen Privasi Komunikasi (CPM) yang dikembangkan oleh Sandra Petronio. CPM menjelaskan proses yang digunakan oleh individu untuk mengelola informasi pribadi dan membagikannya dengan orang lain. Teori ini didasarkan pada beberapa asumsi kunci seperti informasi pribadi, batasan pribadi, kontrol, dan sistem manajemen berdasarkan aturan.
Chapter 13 ppt (communication privacy management theory)
Teori Manajemen Privasi Komunikasi (CPM) menjelaskan proses pengelolaan informasi pribadi dan batasan antara publik dan privat dalam hubungan. CPM berargumen bahwa individu secara aktif membuat aturan untuk mengontrol siapa yang dapat mengakses informasi pribadi mereka dan bagaimana informasi itu dibagikan, serta terus menyesuaikan batasan tersebut seiring perubahan dalam hubungan.
Comm201_Presentation_Chappell
Communication privacy management theory (CPM) states that individuals have ownership over their private information and establish boundaries to control what is concealed or revealed. According to CPM, people create and follow privacy rules to determine how and when to disclose private information to others. CPM has five core principles and provides guidance for revealing or concealing information, especially regarding difficult topics like child abuse, sexual orientation, death, and infidelity. While CPM helps address tensions between privacy and intimacy, it has been criticized for not explaining how to repair breaches in privacy boundaries between individuals.
“You Need to Back Off”: Utilizing Communication Privacy Management Theory to ...
“You Need to Back Off”: Utilizing Communication Privacy Management Theory to ...West Virginia University - Department of Communication Studies
ABSTRACT: One of the most interesting features of social media sites is that they provide both private and public contexts in which to share messages. Studies have suggested that people perceive interpersonal messages differently based on this characteristic, but less is known about how people may intend to respond to messages based on their access exclusivity. Building upon a previous study in this area, the current study examined people’s responses to a hypothetical situation in which they received a negative interpersonal disclosure of varying intensity either publicly or privately through Facebook. Data suggest that privately-disclosed messages elicited more uncertainty and more uncertainty reduction behaviors. Publicly-disclosed messages caused recipients to feel more offended about the content, express privacy violation concerns, and delete the offending content. These findings are discussed for their theoretical value, and limitations and directions for future research are as well.
Goldman, Z., Bowman, N. D., & Westerman, D. (2013, April).“You need to back off:” Utilizing communication privacy management theory to explore responses to public and private interpersonal disclosures on Facebook. Paper presented at the Broadcast Education Association Research Symposium “Media and Social Life: The Self, Relationships, and Society,” Las Vegas. Social penetration theory
Social Penetration Theory describes the process of developing intimacy in relationships through mutual self-disclosure and vulnerability over time. Self-disclosure involves voluntarily sharing personal information about oneself with another and is necessary for relationships to form and communication to occur. For self-disclosure to be effective, it is important to consider the context, audience, and ensure there is reciprocation from the other person. When done properly, self-disclosure can help develop more intimate relationships and improve understanding between people.
Managing Privacy and Context Collapse in the Facebook Age
The growth of social media—online sites driven by the public sharing on personal information with a wide audience—raises new questions related to how individuals manage their privacy and self-presentation. The technical features of sites such as Facebook, Google Plus, and Twitter lower the transaction costs of connecting and interacting with a large and diverse audience. At the same time, they may raise the costs of managing self-presentation across different contexts and ensuring that private information is not shared with unintended audiences.
Discussions related to self-presentation and privacy have featured prominently in the social sciences for more than half a century. For example, Goffman (1959) argued that individuals’ self-presentation varies based on the audience for whom they are performing. Likewise, Altman (1975) viewed privacy not as a static process, but one of dynamic boundary regulation, in which individuals make decisions regarding which pieces of personal information to share with whom, as well as the context in which that information is disclosed.
In online social networking communities, additional social and technical features make the process of managing privacy and self-presentation more complicated. Unlike anonymous forums, where users can create virtual identities not connected to their “real” selves, SNSs are tied to real identities, and because users often share a significant amount of personal information through these sites (Nosko et al., 2010), privacy becomes a critical element to determining both who to connect with and what to disclose. Boyd (2008) characterizes SNSs as
“networked publics,” and describes three features that differentiate them from other publics: invisible audiences, context collapse, and the blurring of public and private. Each of these factors is critical in evaluating how individuals can regulate boundaries and get the most out of their use of these sites.
Context collapse—the flattening of multiple distinct audiences into a homogeneous group—offers benefits and barriers to individuals. The average American adult has 229 Facebook “friends” (Hampton et al., 2011) who comprise a variety of personal and professional contexts. While Facebook enables users to quickly diffuse information across their entire network, communicating with such a diverse set of others through the same channel (e.g., status updates) may become problematic when it prevents individuals from varying their self-presentation for different audiences or when their full audience is unclear.
When facing these challenges, individuals have a number of options. Bernie Hogan (2010) suggests that users employ a “lowest common denominator” approach, whereby only content appropriate for all audiences is shared on the site. On the other hand, users may employ advanced privacy settings to segregate audiences, so they can still share relevant content with their various connections.
Face Negotiation Theory
Face Negotiation Theory is based on face management across cultures to maintain self-image and the image of others during conflict negotiation. It assumes that self-identity and face concerns influence how conflicts are mediated differently across cultures. Certain acts can threaten one's projected self-image or face. Face work and maintenance aim to respect each person's face needs and wants to establish harmony in relationships. Conflict styles also vary between individualistic and collectivistic cultures.
Social Penetration Theory
Social Penetration Theory proposes that closeness in relationships develops gradually through reciprocal self-disclosure from more superficial to intimate levels of sharing. It views personality as layered like an onion, with more public aspects on the outside and private parts at the core. People aim to maximize the benefits of intimacy while minimizing vulnerability by carefully regulating how much they disclose based on expected rewards, costs, and available alternative relationships. However, the theory has been criticized for oversimplifying disclosure dynamics and overlooking gender and cultural factors.
Social Judgment Theory
Social Judgment Theory examines how people evaluate messages or ideas based on their existing views. People have a latitude of acceptance for ideas they agree with, a latitude of rejection for those they disagree with, and a non-committal area in between. High ego-involvement in a topic can lead to errors in judgment as people shift their anchors and assimilate or contrast information to fit their views. To persuade, one should appeal to a person's latitude of acceptance and avoid triggering a boomerang effect. Social Judgment Theory highlights how people judge messages, potential perceptual errors, and strategies for effective persuasion. However, questions remain around the ethics of intentionally manipulating people's views.
Social Judgment Theory: What it's all about?
This powerpoint will provide a brief explanation of what the social judgment theory is and how it works.
Face negotiation theory
Face-Negotiation Theory (FNT) was developed by Stella Ting-Toomey to explain how people negotiate their public self-image, or "face", differently in individualistic versus collectivistic cultures. FNT posits that individualistic cultures prefer self-oriented facework while collectivistic cultures prefer other-oriented facework. FNT also identifies four types of facework - face-restoration, face-saving, face-giving, and face-assertion - and states that the approach to conflict management is influenced by a culture's views on face and roles.
Communication Concepts, Theories And Models1
The document provides an overview of communication concepts, theories, models and processes. It discusses definitions of communication, different types including intrapersonal, interpersonal, group and mass communication. Key communication theories are outlined such as the hypodermic needle theory, two-step flow of information, agenda setting theory, reinforcement theory, and uses and gratification theory. Models of communication are also summarized including Aristotle's model, Lasswell's model, Shannon and Weaver's engineering model, and Schramm's interactive model.
Conformity Essays
Conformity Is A Type Of Social Influence
Theories Of Conformity
Conformity and Obedience Essays
Conformity In Psychology
Essay about On Conformity and Obedience
Conformity Research Paper
What Is Conformity?
Conformity And Personal Conformity
Conformity and Obedience Essay
Conformity Case Study Essay
Conformity Vs. Conformity Theory
Conformity Research Paper
Conformity Essay
Conformity Literature Review
Is Conformity Good Or Bad
Social Conformity Essay
Conformity Essay
Conformity And Social Conformity
Example Of Conformity Essay
The Power of Conformity Essay
Stop Googling. Let’s Talk.By Sherry Turkle· Sept. 26, 2015· .docx
Stop Googling. Let’s Talk.
By Sherry Turkle
· Sept. 26, 2015
·
·
·
·
·
·
· 300
CreditYann Kebbi
Image
CreditCreditYann Kebbi
COLLEGE students tell me they know how to look someone in the eye and type on their phones at the same time, their split attention undetected. They say it’s a skill they mastered in middle school when they wanted to text in class without getting caught. Now they use it when they want to be both with their friends and, as some put it, “elsewhere.”
These days, we feel less of a need to hide the fact that we are dividing our attention. In a 2015 study by the Pew Research Center, 89 percent of cellphone owners said they had used their phones during the last social gathering they attended. But they weren’t happy about it; 82 percent of adults felt that the way they used their phones in social settings hurt the conversation.
I’ve been studying the psychology of online connectivity for more than 30 years. For the past five, I’ve had a special focus: What has happened to face-to-face conversation in a world where so many people say they would rather text than talk? I’ve looked at families, friendships and romance. I’ve studied schools, universities and workplaces. When college students explain to me how dividing their attention plays out in the dining hall, some refer to a “rule of three.” In a conversation among five or six people at dinner, you have to check that three people are paying attention — heads up — before you give yourself permission to look down at your phone. So conversation proceeds, but with different people having their heads up at different times. The effect is what you would expect: Conversation is kept relatively light, on topics where people feel they can drop in and out.
Young people spoke to me enthusiastically about the good things that flow from a life lived by the rule of three, which you can follow not only during meals but all the time. First of all, there is the magic of the always available elsewhere. You can put your attention wherever you want it to be. You can always be heard. You never have to be bored. When you sense that a lull in the conversation is coming, you can shift your attention from the people in the room to the world you can find on your phone. But the students also described a sense of loss.
One 15-year-old I interviewed at a summer camp talked about her reaction when she went out to dinner with her father and he took out his phone to add “facts” to their conversation. “Daddy,” she said, “stop Googling. I want to talk to you.” A 15-year-old boy told me that someday he wanted to raise a family, not the way his parents are raising him (with phones out during meals and in the park and during his school sports events) but the way his parents think they are raising him — with no phones at meals and plentiful family conversation. One college junior tried to capture what is wrong about life in his generation. “Our texts are fine,” he said. “It’s what texting does to our conversati.
E0815_BEAUTY Psyche
1) The author conducts an experiment to test the theory that talking to strangers on her morning commute would make her happier, as research from University of Chicago suggests. However, she finds it difficult to initiate conversations as everyone is engrossed in their phones.
2) A clinical psychologist cautions that trying to force conversation with strangers will not work and is not natural. Interacting with others is best when it occurs spontaneously through helping others or making casual observations.
3) While social interaction is beneficial to our health and mood, cultural norms, safety concerns, and fear of rejection contribute to people's reluctance to interact with strangers, especially for women commuting alone. Forcing unwanted interaction may cause distress.
Social intelligence si conference la alex zautra
The document discusses social intelligence training as a way to promote public health. It describes how lack of social intelligence can lead to disengagement, disconnection, and disregard for others. Both securely and insecurely attached individuals improved on measures of social intelligence like self-monitoring, sensitivity to others, and emotional intelligence after a 4-month social intelligence training program. Insecurely attached individuals showed the most gains in identifying and describing emotions. The training was effective for both groups in increasing well-being. Social intelligence training could benefit populations like corrections, veterans, parenting, schools, and the workplace. It may help reverse the impacts of early life adversity on mental and physical health.
Essays On Conformity
Conformity and Obedience Essay
An Essay About Conformity
Conformity Among Adolescents
Conformity Essay
Example Of Conformity Essay
Essay On Individuality Vs Conformity
Conformity and Obedience Essays
Essay on Conformity in Brave New World
Reflection Paper On Conformity
Conformity Research Paper
Persuasive Essay On Conformity
An Essay On Conformity And The Unknown Citizen
Essay On Conformity And Ignorance
Write An Essay On Conformity
Persuasive Essay On Conformity
Social Conformity Essay
Research Paper On Conformity
Conformity And Personal Conformity
Essay about On Conformity and Obedience
Conformity Essay
Social Psychology 2_Exclusion and Rejection
The document discusses the basic human need to belong and form social connections. It explains that belongingness helped humans survive and reproduce in evolutionary terms. The need to belong motivates people to affiliate with others and maintain relationships. Not belonging can have negative health impacts. The document also examines various factors that influence attraction and liking between people, such as similarity, reciprocity, familiarity through mere exposure, and social rewards like praise and favors. Shared experiences can also increase attraction even if the experiences were negative.
Conformity Research Paper
This document summarizes a research paper on conformity. It explains that conformity is when one thinks or acts similarly to others in a social group in order to fit in. Conformity can be subtle and unconscious or come from social pressure. Motivators for conformity include normative influence of fitting in and informational influence of being told what is normal by society. Both men and women will conform to a relevant social group for acceptance.
St. Thomas Aquinas - Keep it Sweet
The document discusses the negative effects of gossip and bullying among teenagers. It defines gossip and notes that gossip can be a form of bullying that hurts people's self-esteem. The document outlines how gossip spreads in social groups and cliques and how indirect bullying through rumors can isolate and depress teens. It examines why people gossip and lists alternatives to gossiping like journaling or speaking up. The summary provides background on a presentation developed to address this issue and prevent gossip among students.
Essay About Honesty
The document discusses the importance of honesty. It argues that honesty is the foundation for building relationships with loved ones as it creates trust. It also plays a key role in raising children to become good citizens. The document then shares a personal story about how the author learned the value of honesty as a child after accidentally taking some money that did not belong to them. Their mother's example of returning the money taught the author an important lesson about honesty. Overall, the document emphasizes that honesty is a virtue that builds honor and trust between people.
Running Head STEREOTYPES1STEREOTYPES5St.docx
Running Head: STEREOTYPES 1
STEREOTYPES 5
Stereotypes
name
PHI103: Informal Logic
Instructor:
May 8, 2013
Stereotypes
Stereotyping is any commonly known public belief about a certain social group or individual. They are often confused with prejudices because like prejudices a stereotype is simply based on a prior assumption. There are many different types of stereotypes such as race, gender and lifestyle. Stereotypes are not easy for individuals to deal with because at times others say and do things that are extremely harsh. These stereotypes can affect individuals in many ways if they don’t know how to overcome what others say.
I have gone through a lot of stereotypes in my time, but one that is most common is my race. I am Puerto Rican, African American, and Italian. When people here that I am Puerto Rican, African American, and Italian they ask if I like to drink. They say that people in these races are usually heavy drinkers. They are surprised to know that I don’t drink and at times I get asked what’s wrong with me and I reply nothing. Another stereotype I here is “Do you have family members in the Mafia?” No, I don’t have family members in the Mafia. Just because someone is Italian it doesn’t mean that they are nor have family members that are a part of the Mafia. Another stereotype I have had to deal with because of my race is “Do you have members of your family that are in jail?” Once again no I don’t and I just brush it off. Lastly, the one I hear a lot is that Puerto Ricans are uneducated lazy people and have a lot of kids with different individuals. I obviously am an educated individual. I have gone to work to come home to three beautiful children all from the same woman and have provided, and taken great care of them. My home is always clean and smells delightful.
A stereotype that I have dealt with and continue to deal with is being mixed with African American. There is a lot of stereo typing and always wondering what’s going on around me. Some people say that we are beneath them and shouldn’t acquire a position above them. Some people won’t listen to me when I tell them how it is. Just the other day someone told me you are lucky to be African American because all the benefits you get. When I lived in New York I held a wonderful job as a Paraprofessional. When I moved to Florida I knew it was going to be tough at first when we moved because of several reasons. In New York, I had two children in school, but in the start of Florida only one would attend because of when the others birthday. This left not one but two children at home. Child Care for one child is expensive enough so imagine for two. So I decided to stay home and concentrate on not only my studies but my daughters education. She loved going to school and so since in New York I gained the knowledge of teaching as a Paraprofessional, I decided to work with her. It also gives me time for my school work and hopefully somet.
Conformity Essay
Conformity Literature Review
Conformity Essay
Conformity and Obedience Essay
Conformity And Personal Conformity
The Power of Conformity Essay
Is Conformity Good Or Bad
What Is Conformity?
Conformity In Psychology
Conformity and Obedience Essays
Conformity Case Study Essay
Individuality Vs Conformity Essay
Social Conformity Essay
Fighting Conformity Essay
Reflection Paper On Conformity
Conformity and Individuality Essay
Conformity Essay
Theories Of Conformity
Conformity And Social Conformity
Example Of Conformity Essay
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Social penetration theory
Social Penetration Theory describes the process of developing intimacy in relationships through mutual self-disclosure and vulnerability over time. Self-disclosure involves voluntarily sharing personal information about oneself with another and is necessary for relationships to form and communication to occur. For self-disclosure to be effective, it is important to consider the context, audience, and ensure there is reciprocation from the other person. When done properly, self-disclosure can help develop more intimate relationships and improve understanding between people.
Managing Privacy and Context Collapse in the Facebook Age
The growth of social media—online sites driven by the public sharing on personal information with a wide audience—raises new questions related to how individuals manage their privacy and self-presentation. The technical features of sites such as Facebook, Google Plus, and Twitter lower the transaction costs of connecting and interacting with a large and diverse audience. At the same time, they may raise the costs of managing self-presentation across different contexts and ensuring that private information is not shared with unintended audiences.
Discussions related to self-presentation and privacy have featured prominently in the social sciences for more than half a century. For example, Goffman (1959) argued that individuals’ self-presentation varies based on the audience for whom they are performing. Likewise, Altman (1975) viewed privacy not as a static process, but one of dynamic boundary regulation, in which individuals make decisions regarding which pieces of personal information to share with whom, as well as the context in which that information is disclosed.
In online social networking communities, additional social and technical features make the process of managing privacy and self-presentation more complicated. Unlike anonymous forums, where users can create virtual identities not connected to their “real” selves, SNSs are tied to real identities, and because users often share a significant amount of personal information through these sites (Nosko et al., 2010), privacy becomes a critical element to determining both who to connect with and what to disclose. Boyd (2008) characterizes SNSs as
“networked publics,” and describes three features that differentiate them from other publics: invisible audiences, context collapse, and the blurring of public and private. Each of these factors is critical in evaluating how individuals can regulate boundaries and get the most out of their use of these sites.
Context collapse—the flattening of multiple distinct audiences into a homogeneous group—offers benefits and barriers to individuals. The average American adult has 229 Facebook “friends” (Hampton et al., 2011) who comprise a variety of personal and professional contexts. While Facebook enables users to quickly diffuse information across their entire network, communicating with such a diverse set of others through the same channel (e.g., status updates) may become problematic when it prevents individuals from varying their self-presentation for different audiences or when their full audience is unclear.
When facing these challenges, individuals have a number of options. Bernie Hogan (2010) suggests that users employ a “lowest common denominator” approach, whereby only content appropriate for all audiences is shared on the site. On the other hand, users may employ advanced privacy settings to segregate audiences, so they can still share relevant content with their various connections.
Face Negotiation Theory
Face Negotiation Theory is based on face management across cultures to maintain self-image and the image of others during conflict negotiation. It assumes that self-identity and face concerns influence how conflicts are mediated differently across cultures. Certain acts can threaten one's projected self-image or face. Face work and maintenance aim to respect each person's face needs and wants to establish harmony in relationships. Conflict styles also vary between individualistic and collectivistic cultures.
Social Penetration Theory
Social Penetration Theory proposes that closeness in relationships develops gradually through reciprocal self-disclosure from more superficial to intimate levels of sharing. It views personality as layered like an onion, with more public aspects on the outside and private parts at the core. People aim to maximize the benefits of intimacy while minimizing vulnerability by carefully regulating how much they disclose based on expected rewards, costs, and available alternative relationships. However, the theory has been criticized for oversimplifying disclosure dynamics and overlooking gender and cultural factors.
Social Judgment Theory
Social Judgment Theory examines how people evaluate messages or ideas based on their existing views. People have a latitude of acceptance for ideas they agree with, a latitude of rejection for those they disagree with, and a non-committal area in between. High ego-involvement in a topic can lead to errors in judgment as people shift their anchors and assimilate or contrast information to fit their views. To persuade, one should appeal to a person's latitude of acceptance and avoid triggering a boomerang effect. Social Judgment Theory highlights how people judge messages, potential perceptual errors, and strategies for effective persuasion. However, questions remain around the ethics of intentionally manipulating people's views.
Social Judgment Theory: What it's all about?
This powerpoint will provide a brief explanation of what the social judgment theory is and how it works.
Face negotiation theory
Face-Negotiation Theory (FNT) was developed by Stella Ting-Toomey to explain how people negotiate their public self-image, or "face", differently in individualistic versus collectivistic cultures. FNT posits that individualistic cultures prefer self-oriented facework while collectivistic cultures prefer other-oriented facework. FNT also identifies four types of facework - face-restoration, face-saving, face-giving, and face-assertion - and states that the approach to conflict management is influenced by a culture's views on face and roles.
Communication Concepts, Theories And Models1
The document provides an overview of communication concepts, theories, models and processes. It discusses definitions of communication, different types including intrapersonal, interpersonal, group and mass communication. Key communication theories are outlined such as the hypodermic needle theory, two-step flow of information, agenda setting theory, reinforcement theory, and uses and gratification theory. Models of communication are also summarized including Aristotle's model, Lasswell's model, Shannon and Weaver's engineering model, and Schramm's interactive model.
Viewers also liked (8)
Managing Privacy and Context Collapse in the Facebook Age
Managing Privacy and Context Collapse in the Facebook Age
Similar to Powerpoint
Conformity Essays
Conformity Is A Type Of Social Influence
Theories Of Conformity
Conformity and Obedience Essays
Conformity In Psychology
Essay about On Conformity and Obedience
Conformity Research Paper
What Is Conformity?
Conformity And Personal Conformity
Conformity and Obedience Essay
Conformity Case Study Essay
Conformity Vs. Conformity Theory
Conformity Research Paper
Conformity Essay
Conformity Literature Review
Is Conformity Good Or Bad
Social Conformity Essay
Conformity Essay
Conformity And Social Conformity
Example Of Conformity Essay
The Power of Conformity Essay
Stop Googling. Let’s Talk.By Sherry Turkle· Sept. 26, 2015· .docx
Stop Googling. Let’s Talk.
By Sherry Turkle
· Sept. 26, 2015
·
·
·
·
·
·
· 300
CreditYann Kebbi
Image
CreditCreditYann Kebbi
COLLEGE students tell me they know how to look someone in the eye and type on their phones at the same time, their split attention undetected. They say it’s a skill they mastered in middle school when they wanted to text in class without getting caught. Now they use it when they want to be both with their friends and, as some put it, “elsewhere.”
These days, we feel less of a need to hide the fact that we are dividing our attention. In a 2015 study by the Pew Research Center, 89 percent of cellphone owners said they had used their phones during the last social gathering they attended. But they weren’t happy about it; 82 percent of adults felt that the way they used their phones in social settings hurt the conversation.
I’ve been studying the psychology of online connectivity for more than 30 years. For the past five, I’ve had a special focus: What has happened to face-to-face conversation in a world where so many people say they would rather text than talk? I’ve looked at families, friendships and romance. I’ve studied schools, universities and workplaces. When college students explain to me how dividing their attention plays out in the dining hall, some refer to a “rule of three.” In a conversation among five or six people at dinner, you have to check that three people are paying attention — heads up — before you give yourself permission to look down at your phone. So conversation proceeds, but with different people having their heads up at different times. The effect is what you would expect: Conversation is kept relatively light, on topics where people feel they can drop in and out.
Young people spoke to me enthusiastically about the good things that flow from a life lived by the rule of three, which you can follow not only during meals but all the time. First of all, there is the magic of the always available elsewhere. You can put your attention wherever you want it to be. You can always be heard. You never have to be bored. When you sense that a lull in the conversation is coming, you can shift your attention from the people in the room to the world you can find on your phone. But the students also described a sense of loss.
One 15-year-old I interviewed at a summer camp talked about her reaction when she went out to dinner with her father and he took out his phone to add “facts” to their conversation. “Daddy,” she said, “stop Googling. I want to talk to you.” A 15-year-old boy told me that someday he wanted to raise a family, not the way his parents are raising him (with phones out during meals and in the park and during his school sports events) but the way his parents think they are raising him — with no phones at meals and plentiful family conversation. One college junior tried to capture what is wrong about life in his generation. “Our texts are fine,” he said. “It’s what texting does to our conversati.
E0815_BEAUTY Psyche
1) The author conducts an experiment to test the theory that talking to strangers on her morning commute would make her happier, as research from University of Chicago suggests. However, she finds it difficult to initiate conversations as everyone is engrossed in their phones.
2) A clinical psychologist cautions that trying to force conversation with strangers will not work and is not natural. Interacting with others is best when it occurs spontaneously through helping others or making casual observations.
3) While social interaction is beneficial to our health and mood, cultural norms, safety concerns, and fear of rejection contribute to people's reluctance to interact with strangers, especially for women commuting alone. Forcing unwanted interaction may cause distress.
Social intelligence si conference la alex zautra
The document discusses social intelligence training as a way to promote public health. It describes how lack of social intelligence can lead to disengagement, disconnection, and disregard for others. Both securely and insecurely attached individuals improved on measures of social intelligence like self-monitoring, sensitivity to others, and emotional intelligence after a 4-month social intelligence training program. Insecurely attached individuals showed the most gains in identifying and describing emotions. The training was effective for both groups in increasing well-being. Social intelligence training could benefit populations like corrections, veterans, parenting, schools, and the workplace. It may help reverse the impacts of early life adversity on mental and physical health.
Essays On Conformity
Conformity and Obedience Essay
An Essay About Conformity
Conformity Among Adolescents
Conformity Essay
Example Of Conformity Essay
Essay On Individuality Vs Conformity
Conformity and Obedience Essays
Essay on Conformity in Brave New World
Reflection Paper On Conformity
Conformity Research Paper
Persuasive Essay On Conformity
An Essay On Conformity And The Unknown Citizen
Essay On Conformity And Ignorance
Write An Essay On Conformity
Persuasive Essay On Conformity
Social Conformity Essay
Research Paper On Conformity
Conformity And Personal Conformity
Essay about On Conformity and Obedience
Conformity Essay
Social Psychology 2_Exclusion and Rejection
The document discusses the basic human need to belong and form social connections. It explains that belongingness helped humans survive and reproduce in evolutionary terms. The need to belong motivates people to affiliate with others and maintain relationships. Not belonging can have negative health impacts. The document also examines various factors that influence attraction and liking between people, such as similarity, reciprocity, familiarity through mere exposure, and social rewards like praise and favors. Shared experiences can also increase attraction even if the experiences were negative.
Conformity Research Paper
This document summarizes a research paper on conformity. It explains that conformity is when one thinks or acts similarly to others in a social group in order to fit in. Conformity can be subtle and unconscious or come from social pressure. Motivators for conformity include normative influence of fitting in and informational influence of being told what is normal by society. Both men and women will conform to a relevant social group for acceptance.
St. Thomas Aquinas - Keep it Sweet
The document discusses the negative effects of gossip and bullying among teenagers. It defines gossip and notes that gossip can be a form of bullying that hurts people's self-esteem. The document outlines how gossip spreads in social groups and cliques and how indirect bullying through rumors can isolate and depress teens. It examines why people gossip and lists alternatives to gossiping like journaling or speaking up. The summary provides background on a presentation developed to address this issue and prevent gossip among students.
Essay About Honesty
The document discusses the importance of honesty. It argues that honesty is the foundation for building relationships with loved ones as it creates trust. It also plays a key role in raising children to become good citizens. The document then shares a personal story about how the author learned the value of honesty as a child after accidentally taking some money that did not belong to them. Their mother's example of returning the money taught the author an important lesson about honesty. Overall, the document emphasizes that honesty is a virtue that builds honor and trust between people.
Running Head STEREOTYPES1STEREOTYPES5St.docx
Running Head: STEREOTYPES 1
STEREOTYPES 5
Stereotypes
name
PHI103: Informal Logic
Instructor:
May 8, 2013
Stereotypes
Stereotyping is any commonly known public belief about a certain social group or individual. They are often confused with prejudices because like prejudices a stereotype is simply based on a prior assumption. There are many different types of stereotypes such as race, gender and lifestyle. Stereotypes are not easy for individuals to deal with because at times others say and do things that are extremely harsh. These stereotypes can affect individuals in many ways if they don’t know how to overcome what others say.
I have gone through a lot of stereotypes in my time, but one that is most common is my race. I am Puerto Rican, African American, and Italian. When people here that I am Puerto Rican, African American, and Italian they ask if I like to drink. They say that people in these races are usually heavy drinkers. They are surprised to know that I don’t drink and at times I get asked what’s wrong with me and I reply nothing. Another stereotype I here is “Do you have family members in the Mafia?” No, I don’t have family members in the Mafia. Just because someone is Italian it doesn’t mean that they are nor have family members that are a part of the Mafia. Another stereotype I have had to deal with because of my race is “Do you have members of your family that are in jail?” Once again no I don’t and I just brush it off. Lastly, the one I hear a lot is that Puerto Ricans are uneducated lazy people and have a lot of kids with different individuals. I obviously am an educated individual. I have gone to work to come home to three beautiful children all from the same woman and have provided, and taken great care of them. My home is always clean and smells delightful.
A stereotype that I have dealt with and continue to deal with is being mixed with African American. There is a lot of stereo typing and always wondering what’s going on around me. Some people say that we are beneath them and shouldn’t acquire a position above them. Some people won’t listen to me when I tell them how it is. Just the other day someone told me you are lucky to be African American because all the benefits you get. When I lived in New York I held a wonderful job as a Paraprofessional. When I moved to Florida I knew it was going to be tough at first when we moved because of several reasons. In New York, I had two children in school, but in the start of Florida only one would attend because of when the others birthday. This left not one but two children at home. Child Care for one child is expensive enough so imagine for two. So I decided to stay home and concentrate on not only my studies but my daughters education. She loved going to school and so since in New York I gained the knowledge of teaching as a Paraprofessional, I decided to work with her. It also gives me time for my school work and hopefully somet.
Conformity Essay
Conformity Literature Review
Conformity Essay
Conformity and Obedience Essay
Conformity And Personal Conformity
The Power of Conformity Essay
Is Conformity Good Or Bad
What Is Conformity?
Conformity In Psychology
Conformity and Obedience Essays
Conformity Case Study Essay
Individuality Vs Conformity Essay
Social Conformity Essay
Fighting Conformity Essay
Reflection Paper On Conformity
Conformity and Individuality Essay
Conformity Essay
Theories Of Conformity
Conformity And Social Conformity
Example Of Conformity Essay
Similar to Powerpoint (11)
Stop Googling. Let’s Talk.By Sherry Turkle· Sept. 26, 2015· .docx
Stop Googling. Let’s Talk.By Sherry Turkle· Sept. 26, 2015· .docx
Powerpoint
- 1. Chapter 13 Communication Privacy Management Theory
- 2. Introduction Purpose Privacy versus disclosure Vital to managing relationships Relational and individual concerns Recency New thinking Growing field Specific focus
- 3. Evolution 1990 Men and women have different rules for disclosure 1991 Microtheoryconfined to married couples Now Macrotheory including groups and organizations
- 4. Risks Bad timing Wrong people Revealing too much Compromising others Benefits Increase social control Become more intimate Validate our perspectives Disclosure
- 5. Assumptions Rules and Systems Approach Humans are choice makers Humans are rule makers and followers Humans make choices and rules based on a consideration of both themselves and others Dialectic Theory Relational life is characterized by change Contradiction is the fundamental fact of relational life
- 6. Suppositions Private Information About things that matter deeply to a person Intimacy is knowing someone deeply in all ways Private disclosure is the process of communicating private information to another Private Boundaries Collective boundaries include more than one person Personal boundaries include just one person Control and Ownership Feeling that they own private information and believing that they should be able to control who has access to it
- 7. Critique Scope Logical Consistency Parsimony Utility Testability Heurism Test of Time
- 8. Personal As an owner of private information about myself, it should be under my control who else (if anyone) is allowed to gain access to my personal life. So when I came home for spring break, newly single, I did not want to make it a big deal. Unfortunately, I made the mistake of turning to my best friend and saying, “I have to tell you something later.” Worried by my tone of voice, she started the interrogation process right in front of everyone else in the room. Of course everyone was instantly curious. I felt like I was losing control as they pried the details out of me. My ownership had been violated and even though I was surrounded by friends, I felt helpless.
- 9. Question John Caughlin and Tamara Afifi found that avoiding disclosures or maintaining private ownership of information can sometimes be helpful to relationships. Specifically, they found study participants less likely to be unhappy about topic avoidance when motivated by a desire to protect the relationship, but is it ever really okay to hide something from your spouse?