The document summarizes several demonstration tests comparing conventional generator and transformer technologies to Regenerative Acceleration Generator and Bi-Toroid transformer technologies. Test 1 showed the regenerative generator increased output power by 373% while reducing motor input power by 41%. Test 2 further optimized the regenerative generator. Test 3 directly compared performance, finding the regenerative generator provided a 589% higher output with 6.5% lower input. The bi-toroid transformer maintained a power factor of 0 on and off load, unlike a conventional transformer whose power factor mirrored the load.
Potential Difference MAGNA International ReGenX & BiTT PresentationThane Heins
The document summarizes several demonstration tests comparing a conventional generator and transformer to a Regenerative Acceleration Generator and Bi-Toroid transformer. Test 1 showed the regenerative generator increased output by 373% while reducing motor input by 41%. Test 2 optimized the regenerative generator's coils. Test 3 compared the generators, finding the regenerative generator increased output by 498% over conventional with an 11.6% motor decrease. Test 4 showed the bi-toroid transformer maintained a power factor of 0 on and off load, unlike the conventional transformer.
ReGenX TORQUE TESTS for Magna International GeneratorThane Heins
Dyno testing was conducted on a regenerative acceleration generator prototype to measure torque output under different loading conditions. An induction generator was used as a torque sensor and drive shaft torque was calculated from generator output power and RPM. Testing showed that a conventional generator reduces drive shaft torque by 10% under load, while the regenerative acceleration generator increases torque by up to 17% under load due to its complementary torque production. The regenerative generator also increased its own speed and torque internally under heavier loads.
Hartwick National Rresearch Ccouncil of Canada Dec. 2009 ReGen-X Generator Te...Potential Difference Inc.
The document summarizes tests of a regenerative acceleration generator coil conducted by NRC scientist Doug Hartwick on December 15, 2009. The tests show that with a 10 ohm load, the regenerative coil requires a 40.2% decrease in input power compared to a 12.3% increase for a conventional generator, while providing a 223.8% gain in output power. Additionally, with the regenerative coil and no reduction in input, output increased to 16.1 Watts with a 62% reduction in prime mover power consumption compared to a conventional generator producing 0 Watts of output. The conclusions are that the regenerative coil can deliver load power with zero increase in mechanical input power, providing infinite conversion efficiency.
Infinite generator conversion efficiency would occur if the generator delivered any amount of electrical power to the load with a zero Watt increase in mechanical input power / zero Amp increase in prime mover current over the no load current magnitude.
Because the ReGenX Generator delivers output power to the load and the mechanical drive shaft power supplied to the generator drops below the idle magnitude of 0.00 Watts the ReGenX Generator operates at beyond infinite efficiency, assuming such a number actually existed.
ReGenX Generator & Motor Prototypes 1, 2, & 3 for Performance ConfirmationThane Heins
Thane C. Heins
President and CEO
Potential +/- Difference inc.
Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration and Charging Ahead...
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
― Buckminster Fuller
The document describes demonstrations of two prototypes for an electric vehicle regenerative acceleration system. Prototype 1 shows how the regenerative acceleration generator coil produces a delayed load current compared to a conventional coil, assisting the departure of rotor magnets. Performance data shows it recharges batteries while maintaining vehicle speed. Prototype 2 demonstrates regenerative acceleration above a critical frequency and regenerative braking below it through load current manipulation. It recharges batteries without decelerating above the critical frequency.
The document summarizes test data from a prototype regenerative generator (ReGenX Generator) that employs conventional generator coils and ReGenX coils wound on an E core. Key findings include:
1) The ReGenX coils produce an on-load delayed magnetic field that accelerates the generator system, reducing prime mover input power consumption compared to the conventional generator coils.
2) Up to 13.2 watts of power was delivered to the load by the ReGenX coils while reducing prime mover input power by up to 13 watts.
3) The ReGenX coils demonstrate "flux harvesting" where discharging magnetic flux accelerates the system and increases power output of the conventional coil.
Potential Difference MAGNA International ReGenX & BiTT PresentationThane Heins
The document summarizes several demonstration tests comparing a conventional generator and transformer to a Regenerative Acceleration Generator and Bi-Toroid transformer. Test 1 showed the regenerative generator increased output by 373% while reducing motor input by 41%. Test 2 optimized the regenerative generator's coils. Test 3 compared the generators, finding the regenerative generator increased output by 498% over conventional with an 11.6% motor decrease. Test 4 showed the bi-toroid transformer maintained a power factor of 0 on and off load, unlike the conventional transformer.
ReGenX TORQUE TESTS for Magna International GeneratorThane Heins
Dyno testing was conducted on a regenerative acceleration generator prototype to measure torque output under different loading conditions. An induction generator was used as a torque sensor and drive shaft torque was calculated from generator output power and RPM. Testing showed that a conventional generator reduces drive shaft torque by 10% under load, while the regenerative acceleration generator increases torque by up to 17% under load due to its complementary torque production. The regenerative generator also increased its own speed and torque internally under heavier loads.
Hartwick National Rresearch Ccouncil of Canada Dec. 2009 ReGen-X Generator Te...Potential Difference Inc.
The document summarizes tests of a regenerative acceleration generator coil conducted by NRC scientist Doug Hartwick on December 15, 2009. The tests show that with a 10 ohm load, the regenerative coil requires a 40.2% decrease in input power compared to a 12.3% increase for a conventional generator, while providing a 223.8% gain in output power. Additionally, with the regenerative coil and no reduction in input, output increased to 16.1 Watts with a 62% reduction in prime mover power consumption compared to a conventional generator producing 0 Watts of output. The conclusions are that the regenerative coil can deliver load power with zero increase in mechanical input power, providing infinite conversion efficiency.
Infinite generator conversion efficiency would occur if the generator delivered any amount of electrical power to the load with a zero Watt increase in mechanical input power / zero Amp increase in prime mover current over the no load current magnitude.
Because the ReGenX Generator delivers output power to the load and the mechanical drive shaft power supplied to the generator drops below the idle magnitude of 0.00 Watts the ReGenX Generator operates at beyond infinite efficiency, assuming such a number actually existed.
ReGenX Generator & Motor Prototypes 1, 2, & 3 for Performance ConfirmationThane Heins
Thane C. Heins
President and CEO
Potential +/- Difference inc.
Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration and Charging Ahead...
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
― Buckminster Fuller
The document describes demonstrations of two prototypes for an electric vehicle regenerative acceleration system. Prototype 1 shows how the regenerative acceleration generator coil produces a delayed load current compared to a conventional coil, assisting the departure of rotor magnets. Performance data shows it recharges batteries while maintaining vehicle speed. Prototype 2 demonstrates regenerative acceleration above a critical frequency and regenerative braking below it through load current manipulation. It recharges batteries without decelerating above the critical frequency.
The document summarizes test data from a prototype regenerative generator (ReGenX Generator) that employs conventional generator coils and ReGenX coils wound on an E core. Key findings include:
1) The ReGenX coils produce an on-load delayed magnetic field that accelerates the generator system, reducing prime mover input power consumption compared to the conventional generator coils.
2) Up to 13.2 watts of power was delivered to the load by the ReGenX coils while reducing prime mover input power by up to 13 watts.
3) The ReGenX coils demonstrate "flux harvesting" where discharging magnetic flux accelerates the system and increases power output of the conventional coil.
The document discusses testing of a permanent magnet generator prototype invented by Thane Heins of Potential Difference Inc. It was delivered to Design 1st for testing and analysis. The testing aims to confirm the efficiency and performance of the ReGenX Generator, ReGen-X Quantum Motor, electric vehicle regenerative acceleration technology, and bi-toroid step-down transformer. The document provides background on these technologies and discusses how they are claimed to operate differently than currently accepted scientific principles around generators, motors, and transformers. It presents findings from tests conducted on the technologies.
Potential Difference National Research Council of Canada Report FinalThane Heins
This document summarizes tests of a ReGenX generator innovation that aims to reverse conventional generator armature reaction. Test 1 establishes a baseline where a conventional induction generator requires 0.22 amps of load current to decelerate the system by 1.8%. Test 2 shows that a conventional coil in the ReGenX prototype decelerates the system by 12.4% with 1.4 amps of current. However, Test 3 shows that the ReGenX coils accelerate the system with 1.6 amps of current instead of decelerating it. Test 4 further demonstrates system acceleration rather than deceleration when load current is increased for a ReGenX induction generator. The report concludes that unlike conventional generators, the ReGen
Thane C. Heins
President and CEO
Potential +/- Difference inc.
Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration and Charging Ahead...
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
― Buckminster Fuller
The document compares a conventional 1 MW generator to a ReGenX 1 MW generator. The ReGenX generator requires no additional mechanical input power when under load compared to no-load, while the conventional generator requires 1 MW more input power under load. Both generator types produce 1 MW of output power under load but the ReGenX generator maintains the system speed of 3500 RPM with less than 0.5 MW of total mechanical input power, offering power generation efficiencies over the conventional generator.
Conventional generators require more mechanical input power when delivering electrical output power due to armature reaction, which increases the mechanical power requirement by an additional 1 MW. In contrast, ReGenX generators reverse armature reaction, requiring less mechanical input power on-load than when idling. Specifically, a conventional generator needs 2 mechanical Watts of input for every 1 Watt of electrical output, while a ReGenX generator only needs 0.4 mechanical Watts of input for every 1 Watt of electrical output.
INTRODUCTION:
Permanent magnet (PM) generator and motor technologies are receiving increased attention due to their promising performance features. A PM motor/generator prototype invented by Thane Heins of Potential Difference inc. was delivered to Design 1st for testing and analysis.
The goal of this test program is to confirm the efficiency and performance features of the ReGenX Inverter Generator, ReGen-X Quantum Motor, Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology and the Bi-Toroid Step Down
Transformer.
This report presents findings of the test program.
Relevant US Technology Patents Granted
Generator and improved coil therefor having electrodynamic properties, Patent number: 10103591
https://patents.justia.com/patent/10103591
Bi-toroidal topology transformer, Patent number: 9230730 https://patents.justia.com/patent/9230730
Flyback mode process harnessing generator action in electric motor, Patent number: 10291162
https://patents.justia.com/patent/10291162
Discussion Document RE: Complete Potential Difference Innovations Test ProgramThane Heins
Introduction:
Permanent magnet (PM) generator and motor technologies are receiving increased attention due to their promising performance features. A PM motor/generator prototype invented by Thane Heins of Potential Difference inc. has been presented for testing and analysis.
The goal of this test program is to confirm the efficiency and performance features of the ReGenX Inverter Generator, ReGen-X Quantum Motor, Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology and the Bi-Toroid Step Down Transformer.
This report presents findings of the test program.
Relevant US Technology Patents Granted
Generator And Improved Coil Therefor Having Electrodynamic Properties, Patent number: 10103591 https://patents.justia.com/patent/10103591
Bi-Toroidal Topology Transformer, Patent number: 9230730 https://patents.justia.com/patent/9230730
Flyback Mode Process Harnessing Generator Action In Electric Motor, Patent number: 10291162 https://patents.justia.com/patent/10291162
Thane C. Heins
CEO Potential +/- Difference inc.
thaneh@potentialdifference.ca
1.613.898.1131
Potential +/- Difference inc. - Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology & Charging Ahead...
"Discovery is simply seeing what everyone else has seen - but thinking what no-one else has thought."
~ Albert Szent-Györgyi Nobel prize-winning Hungarian scientist
Potential +/- Difference Inc.
Clean-Tech Solutions at a Glace...
Global Clean-Tech Problem No. 1
Electric generator Back EMF Induced Counter-Electomotive-Torque causing system deceleration on-load and EV deceleration during regenerative braking.
PDi Solution:
Delay generator load current by 45 degrees and reverse said torque and create Back EMF induced Complementary-Electromotive-Torque allowing system acceleration on-load and EV acceleration during EV Regenerative Acceleration
Global Clean-Tech Problem No. 2
Transformer Back EMF Induced Magnetic Fields and Load Power Factor causing transformer efficiency overheating and efficiency losses.
PDi Solution:
Divert and delay said magnetic fields and use them to do useful work.
Global Clean-Tech Problem No. 3
Water chemical contamination and removal difficulties.
PDi Solution:
Evaporate contaminated water and remove chemicals from the steam.
INTRODUCTION:
Permanent magnet (PM) generator and motor technologies are receiving increased attention due to their promising performance features. A PM motor/generator prototype invented by Thane Heins of Potential Difference inc. was delivered to Design 1st for testing and analysis.
The goal of this test program is to confirm the efficiency and performance features of the ReGenX Inverter Generator, ReGen-X Quantum Motor, Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology and the Bi-Toroid Step Down
Transformer.
This report presents findings of the test program.
Relevant US Technology Patents Granted
Generator and improved coil therefor having electrodynamic properties, Patent number: 10103591
https://patents.justia.com/patent/10103591
Bi-toroidal topology transformer, Patent number: 9230730 https://patents.justia.com/patent/9230730
Flyback mode process harnessing generator action in electric motor, Patent number: 10291162
https://patents.justia.com/patent/10291162
Thane C. Heins
CEO Potential +/- Difference Inc.
thaneh@potentialdifference.ca
1.613.898.1131
Potential +/- Difference Inc. - Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology &
Charging Ahead...
1. The document describes how to calculate the efficiency of a "black box" electric generator system. It involves comparing the electrical power output of the generator to the mechanical power input to the prime mover.
2. A key point is that a generator called the ReGenX operates at "infinite efficiency" because its coil induces a magnetic field that increases the kinetic energy of the system, allowing the prime mover power consumption to decrease rather than increase under load.
3. The ReGenX works by inducing a magnetic field that complements rather than counters the changing field of the rotating magnet, applying a torque that assists rather than resists the motion. This flux harvesting increases output while reducing mechanical input requirements.
Thane C. Heins
CEO Potential +/- Difference Inc.
thaneh@potentialdifference.ca
1.613.898.1131
Potential +/- Difference Inc. - Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology &
Charging Ahead...
The document describes Potential +/-Difference Inc.'s ReGenX Generator and electric vehicle regenerative acceleration innovations. The ReGenX Generator reverses generator armature reaction, reducing electricity generation costs by over 80%. For electric vehicles, regenerative acceleration recharges batteries during acceleration instead of deceleration. Commercialization plans include developing 30MW and 800MW ReGenX Generators for a methanol plant by 2030. Siemens, GE, and Westinghouse may provide scale-up services.
Siemens Gal Power Systems ReGenX, BiTT and Conventional Generator, Transforme...Thane Heins
Thane C. Heins
President and CEO
Potential +/- Difference inc.
Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration and Charging Ahead...
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
― Buckminster Fuller
Ottawa University / NRC ReGenX Test Set-upThane Heins
1. A test was conducted comparing a conventional generator coil to a Regenerative Acceleration Generator (ReGenX) coil. Both were set up on the same test rig and driven by an identical motor at 2100 RPM with no load.
2. With a 10 ohm load, the conventional generator slowed the system and required 12.3% more input power to maintain 2100 RPM, delivering 1.26 Watts. The ReGenX coil accelerated the system and required 40.2% less input power to maintain 2100 RPM, delivering 223.8% more power.
3. Removing the load reduction from the ReGenX test caused the conventional generator system to stop, while the ReGenX generator maintained 4.08
Magna International Sept.20 Th 2009 Generator Torque TestingThane Heins
Dyno testing was conducted on a regenerative acceleration generator prototype to measure torque output under different loading conditions. An induction generator was used as a torque sensor and drive shaft torque was calculated from generator output power and RPM. Testing showed that a conventional generator reduces drive shaft torque by 10% under load, while the regenerative acceleration generator increases torque by up to 17% under load due to its complementary torque production. The regenerative generator was also found to increase its own drive shaft speed and torque internally under heavier loads.
This document provides an overview of generators, including their principle of operation, history, and types. It discusses how generators work by converting mechanical energy to electrical energy using electromagnetic induction. The history outlines early electrostatic generators and the invention of dynamos and alternators. There are two main types of generators - AC and DC generators - with AC generators being most commonly used in power systems today. Synchronous and induction generators are types of AC generators that are further described.
This document provides an overview of generators, including their principle of operation, history, and types. It discusses how generators work by converting mechanical energy to electrical energy using electromagnetic induction. The history outlines early electrostatic generators and the invention of dynamos and alternators. There are two main types of generators - AC and DC generators - with AC generators being most commonly used in power systems today. Synchronous and induction generators are types of AC generators that are further described.
ReGenX Generator and Bi-Toroid Transformer 3rd Party Independent Test Data and Systems Efficiency Performance Analysis prepared for Siemens March 2018 showing the ReGenX Generator and Bi-Toroid Transformer operating at infinite efficiency.
What does INFINITE EFFICIENCY mean?
Infinite efficiency generator performance means that; a zero Watt mechanical drive shaft input power increase is required when the generator is placed on-load from idle rotational equilibrium.
The document discusses testing of a permanent magnet generator prototype invented by Thane Heins of Potential Difference Inc. It was delivered to Design 1st for testing and analysis. The testing aims to confirm the efficiency and performance of the ReGenX Generator, ReGen-X Quantum Motor, electric vehicle regenerative acceleration technology, and bi-toroid step-down transformer. The document provides background on these technologies and discusses how they are claimed to operate differently than currently accepted scientific principles around generators, motors, and transformers. It presents findings from tests conducted on the technologies.
Potential Difference National Research Council of Canada Report FinalThane Heins
This document summarizes tests of a ReGenX generator innovation that aims to reverse conventional generator armature reaction. Test 1 establishes a baseline where a conventional induction generator requires 0.22 amps of load current to decelerate the system by 1.8%. Test 2 shows that a conventional coil in the ReGenX prototype decelerates the system by 12.4% with 1.4 amps of current. However, Test 3 shows that the ReGenX coils accelerate the system with 1.6 amps of current instead of decelerating it. Test 4 further demonstrates system acceleration rather than deceleration when load current is increased for a ReGenX induction generator. The report concludes that unlike conventional generators, the ReGen
Thane C. Heins
President and CEO
Potential +/- Difference inc.
Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration and Charging Ahead...
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
― Buckminster Fuller
The document compares a conventional 1 MW generator to a ReGenX 1 MW generator. The ReGenX generator requires no additional mechanical input power when under load compared to no-load, while the conventional generator requires 1 MW more input power under load. Both generator types produce 1 MW of output power under load but the ReGenX generator maintains the system speed of 3500 RPM with less than 0.5 MW of total mechanical input power, offering power generation efficiencies over the conventional generator.
Conventional generators require more mechanical input power when delivering electrical output power due to armature reaction, which increases the mechanical power requirement by an additional 1 MW. In contrast, ReGenX generators reverse armature reaction, requiring less mechanical input power on-load than when idling. Specifically, a conventional generator needs 2 mechanical Watts of input for every 1 Watt of electrical output, while a ReGenX generator only needs 0.4 mechanical Watts of input for every 1 Watt of electrical output.
INTRODUCTION:
Permanent magnet (PM) generator and motor technologies are receiving increased attention due to their promising performance features. A PM motor/generator prototype invented by Thane Heins of Potential Difference inc. was delivered to Design 1st for testing and analysis.
The goal of this test program is to confirm the efficiency and performance features of the ReGenX Inverter Generator, ReGen-X Quantum Motor, Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology and the Bi-Toroid Step Down
Transformer.
This report presents findings of the test program.
Relevant US Technology Patents Granted
Generator and improved coil therefor having electrodynamic properties, Patent number: 10103591
https://patents.justia.com/patent/10103591
Bi-toroidal topology transformer, Patent number: 9230730 https://patents.justia.com/patent/9230730
Flyback mode process harnessing generator action in electric motor, Patent number: 10291162
https://patents.justia.com/patent/10291162
Discussion Document RE: Complete Potential Difference Innovations Test ProgramThane Heins
Introduction:
Permanent magnet (PM) generator and motor technologies are receiving increased attention due to their promising performance features. A PM motor/generator prototype invented by Thane Heins of Potential Difference inc. has been presented for testing and analysis.
The goal of this test program is to confirm the efficiency and performance features of the ReGenX Inverter Generator, ReGen-X Quantum Motor, Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology and the Bi-Toroid Step Down Transformer.
This report presents findings of the test program.
Relevant US Technology Patents Granted
Generator And Improved Coil Therefor Having Electrodynamic Properties, Patent number: 10103591 https://patents.justia.com/patent/10103591
Bi-Toroidal Topology Transformer, Patent number: 9230730 https://patents.justia.com/patent/9230730
Flyback Mode Process Harnessing Generator Action In Electric Motor, Patent number: 10291162 https://patents.justia.com/patent/10291162
Thane C. Heins
CEO Potential +/- Difference inc.
thaneh@potentialdifference.ca
1.613.898.1131
Potential +/- Difference inc. - Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology & Charging Ahead...
"Discovery is simply seeing what everyone else has seen - but thinking what no-one else has thought."
~ Albert Szent-Györgyi Nobel prize-winning Hungarian scientist
Potential +/- Difference Inc.
Clean-Tech Solutions at a Glace...
Global Clean-Tech Problem No. 1
Electric generator Back EMF Induced Counter-Electomotive-Torque causing system deceleration on-load and EV deceleration during regenerative braking.
PDi Solution:
Delay generator load current by 45 degrees and reverse said torque and create Back EMF induced Complementary-Electromotive-Torque allowing system acceleration on-load and EV acceleration during EV Regenerative Acceleration
Global Clean-Tech Problem No. 2
Transformer Back EMF Induced Magnetic Fields and Load Power Factor causing transformer efficiency overheating and efficiency losses.
PDi Solution:
Divert and delay said magnetic fields and use them to do useful work.
Global Clean-Tech Problem No. 3
Water chemical contamination and removal difficulties.
PDi Solution:
Evaporate contaminated water and remove chemicals from the steam.
INTRODUCTION:
Permanent magnet (PM) generator and motor technologies are receiving increased attention due to their promising performance features. A PM motor/generator prototype invented by Thane Heins of Potential Difference inc. was delivered to Design 1st for testing and analysis.
The goal of this test program is to confirm the efficiency and performance features of the ReGenX Inverter Generator, ReGen-X Quantum Motor, Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology and the Bi-Toroid Step Down
Transformer.
This report presents findings of the test program.
Relevant US Technology Patents Granted
Generator and improved coil therefor having electrodynamic properties, Patent number: 10103591
https://patents.justia.com/patent/10103591
Bi-toroidal topology transformer, Patent number: 9230730 https://patents.justia.com/patent/9230730
Flyback mode process harnessing generator action in electric motor, Patent number: 10291162
https://patents.justia.com/patent/10291162
Thane C. Heins
CEO Potential +/- Difference Inc.
thaneh@potentialdifference.ca
1.613.898.1131
Potential +/- Difference Inc. - Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology &
Charging Ahead...
1. The document describes how to calculate the efficiency of a "black box" electric generator system. It involves comparing the electrical power output of the generator to the mechanical power input to the prime mover.
2. A key point is that a generator called the ReGenX operates at "infinite efficiency" because its coil induces a magnetic field that increases the kinetic energy of the system, allowing the prime mover power consumption to decrease rather than increase under load.
3. The ReGenX works by inducing a magnetic field that complements rather than counters the changing field of the rotating magnet, applying a torque that assists rather than resists the motion. This flux harvesting increases output while reducing mechanical input requirements.
Thane C. Heins
CEO Potential +/- Difference Inc.
thaneh@potentialdifference.ca
1.613.898.1131
Potential +/- Difference Inc. - Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology &
Charging Ahead...
The document describes Potential +/-Difference Inc.'s ReGenX Generator and electric vehicle regenerative acceleration innovations. The ReGenX Generator reverses generator armature reaction, reducing electricity generation costs by over 80%. For electric vehicles, regenerative acceleration recharges batteries during acceleration instead of deceleration. Commercialization plans include developing 30MW and 800MW ReGenX Generators for a methanol plant by 2030. Siemens, GE, and Westinghouse may provide scale-up services.
Siemens Gal Power Systems ReGenX, BiTT and Conventional Generator, Transforme...Thane Heins
Thane C. Heins
President and CEO
Potential +/- Difference inc.
Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration and Charging Ahead...
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
― Buckminster Fuller
Ottawa University / NRC ReGenX Test Set-upThane Heins
1. A test was conducted comparing a conventional generator coil to a Regenerative Acceleration Generator (ReGenX) coil. Both were set up on the same test rig and driven by an identical motor at 2100 RPM with no load.
2. With a 10 ohm load, the conventional generator slowed the system and required 12.3% more input power to maintain 2100 RPM, delivering 1.26 Watts. The ReGenX coil accelerated the system and required 40.2% less input power to maintain 2100 RPM, delivering 223.8% more power.
3. Removing the load reduction from the ReGenX test caused the conventional generator system to stop, while the ReGenX generator maintained 4.08
Magna International Sept.20 Th 2009 Generator Torque TestingThane Heins
Dyno testing was conducted on a regenerative acceleration generator prototype to measure torque output under different loading conditions. An induction generator was used as a torque sensor and drive shaft torque was calculated from generator output power and RPM. Testing showed that a conventional generator reduces drive shaft torque by 10% under load, while the regenerative acceleration generator increases torque by up to 17% under load due to its complementary torque production. The regenerative generator was also found to increase its own drive shaft speed and torque internally under heavier loads.
This document provides an overview of generators, including their principle of operation, history, and types. It discusses how generators work by converting mechanical energy to electrical energy using electromagnetic induction. The history outlines early electrostatic generators and the invention of dynamos and alternators. There are two main types of generators - AC and DC generators - with AC generators being most commonly used in power systems today. Synchronous and induction generators are types of AC generators that are further described.
This document provides an overview of generators, including their principle of operation, history, and types. It discusses how generators work by converting mechanical energy to electrical energy using electromagnetic induction. The history outlines early electrostatic generators and the invention of dynamos and alternators. There are two main types of generators - AC and DC generators - with AC generators being most commonly used in power systems today. Synchronous and induction generators are types of AC generators that are further described.
ReGenX Generator and Bi-Toroid Transformer 3rd Party Independent Test Data and Systems Efficiency Performance Analysis prepared for Siemens March 2018 showing the ReGenX Generator and Bi-Toroid Transformer operating at infinite efficiency.
What does INFINITE EFFICIENCY mean?
Infinite efficiency generator performance means that; a zero Watt mechanical drive shaft input power increase is required when the generator is placed on-load from idle rotational equilibrium.
Final 2018 Report for SIEMENS ReGenX, BiTT and Conventional Generator, Transf...Thane Heins
This document presents test data from three generator prototypes: 1) A ReGenX generator that aims to reverse conventional generator armature reaction through load current delay, 2) A bi-toroid transformer that also aims to reverse armature reaction, and 3) An electric vehicle regenerative acceleration generator integrating the ReGenX innovation to provide battery charging with vehicle acceleration. Prototype 1 test data shows the ReGenX generator delivering more output power while reducing prime mover input power compared to a conventional generator, demonstrating armature reaction reversal. Prototype 2 similarly shows the bi-toroid transformer providing higher output with lower input power than a conventional transformer. Prototype 3 integrates the ReGenX generator into an electric bike to provide regener
AVL ReGenX Generator Prototypes for Testing and Performance Validation.pdfThane Heins
Thane C. Heins
President and CEO, Potential +/- Difference Inc. R&D
Ottawa, Canada
thaneh@potentialdifference.ca
613.293.1131
"Nothing is too wonderful to be true" ~ Michael Faraday
#6 DATA AVL ReGenX Generator Prototypes for Testing and Performance Validatio...Thane Heins
This document describes three prototypes for a ReGenX generator and motor. Prototype 1 uses an E core with conventional and ReGenX coils to demonstrate load current delay. It is expected to show increased speed and output when the ReGenX coil is loaded due to complementary electromagnetic torque. Prototype 2 uses a C core with one conventional and three ReGenX coils, and is intended to output 90W to a battery load. Prototype 3 will demonstrate electric vehicle regenerative acceleration. The ReGenX technology is intended to reverse generator reaction and produce increased output power without additional input.
Introduction
This presentation contains three innovation prototypes and their performance test data:
1) ReGenX Generator, Prototype No. 1 US Patent No. US 20140111054
2) Bi-Toroid Transformer, Prototype No. 2 US Patent No. US 9,230,730 B2
3) Electric Vehicle (EV) Regenerative Acceleration (ReGenX) Generator, Prototype No. 3
The ReGenX Generator is proven to reverse Generator Armature Reaction by introducing a Load Current Delay into the generator’s performance. Generator Armature Reaction accounts for 80% of the cost associated with electric power generation and 80% of the Greenhouse Gas emissions from fossil fuel electric power generation and 80% of the nuclear waste from nuclear power generation. Generator Armature Reaction manifests itself in electric vehicles (EV) as regenerative braking, i.e. battery recharging and vehicle deceleration. Generator Armature Reaction is a Counter-Electromagnetic-Torque which is produced inside all electric generators when the generator is placed on-load and when electric power is delivered to the load. Generator Armature Reaction’s Counter-Electromagnetic-Induced-Torque works in opposition and reduces the drive shaft torque supplied by the prime mover. Generator Armature Reaction produces system deceleration and the greater the magnitude of Load Current delivered by the generator to the load, the greater the magnitude of the Induced Magnetic Field produced around the current bearing wires which make up the generator coils. The greater the magnitude of generator Load Current, the greater the magnitude of Counter-Electromagnetic-Torque produced (and system deceleration) - the more the input power to the prime mover must be increased in order to overcome the generator’s Counter-Electromagnetic-Torque. The ReGenX Generator and Bi-Toroid Transformer technology innovations use the exact same induced magnetic fields (albeit delayed in the time domain) to accelerate the system on-load and produce a ComplementaryElectromagnetic-Torque, rater than decelerating it via the Counter-Electromagnetic-Torque. The ReGenX Generator and Bi-Toroid Transformer technology innovations both require a decrease in on-load prime mover input rather than an increase.
ReGenX Generator, Prototype No.1 is designed demonstrate conventional generator operation, i.e. conventional Generator Armature Reaction, Counter-Electromagnetic-Torque, on-load system deceleration. ReGenX Generator Prototype No.1 is also designed to demonstrate how the ReGenX Generator’s Load Current Delay reverses the conventional generator’s Armature Reaction and produces a ComplementaryElectromagnetic-Torque, on-load system acceleration and the resulting on-load prime mover input power reduction. Prototype No.1 also introduces the concept of Flux Harvesting. Flux Harvesting is employed in the ReGenX generator, Bi-Toroid Transformer and the ReGen-X Motor.
Static capacitors are a method of power factor improvement that has several advantages: they have low losses, no moving parts so require low maintenance, can operate in normal atmospheric conditions, and do not require a foundation. However, their lifespan is relatively short at 8-10 years and switching surges can occur when turning them on/off to match changing loads. Once capacitors fail, repairing them is also costly.
1) A chopper is used to provide variable DC voltage from a constant DC source and is widely used to control DC motors.
2) A chopper-fed DC drive works by connecting a DC chopper between a fixed-voltage DC source and DC motor to vary the armature voltage.
3) A multi-quadrant chopper drive can provide forward power control, forward regeneration, reverse power control, and reverse regeneration by controlling the switching of the thyristors in the chopper circuit.
This document summarizes test results from prototypes of a ReGenX generator, ReGen-X quantum motor, electric vehicle regenerative acceleration technology, and bi-toroid transformer. Key findings include:
1) The ReGenX generator was found to require zero mechanical input power when generating electricity and produced a complementary electromagnetic torque that increased system kinetic energy.
2) The ReGen-X quantum motor required zero electrical input power to produce mechanical output power.
3) Testing confirmed the prototypes performed as predicted by producing output power without requiring direct energy input.
4) Data from multiple prototypes demonstrated innovations that aim to improve generator and motor efficiency.
This document discusses slip power recovery in induction motors using static Kramer and Scherbius drives. It provides details on:
1. The conventional Kramer system controls motor speed by injecting a voltage into the rotor circuit at the slip frequency. This allows increasing or decreasing the rotor resistance to control speed.
2. Static Kramer drives only allow sub-synchronous operation while Static Scherbius drives allow both above and below synchronous speeds.
3. Scherbius drives enable bi-directional power flow using positive and negative injected voltages phase with or opposing the rotor current, allowing a wider range of operating conditions than Kramer drives.
The document discusses the operation of synchronous motors connected to large power systems. Some key points:
1) Synchronous motors operate similarly to synchronous generators but consume power instead of supplying it.
2) When connected to a large power system represented as an "infinite bus", the motor's speed is locked to the system frequency and its voltage matches the system voltage.
3) Under steady state operation, the motor supplies constant speed power to loads while drawing constant real power from the system. An increase in load causes the motor's torque angle to increase to produce more torque.
Synchronous motors operate at a constant synchronous speed determined by the number of poles and frequency of the power supply. They have high efficiency and provide smooth constant torque but are more expensive than induction motors. The rotor is either wound similarly to an induction motor or contains permanent magnets. Methods to provide starting torque include using a pony motor, applying a reduced voltage and frequency to the rotor windings to make it operate like an induction motor initially, or using damper windings. Synchronous motors are commonly used for power factor correction by varying the field excitation to control the phase relationship between voltage and current.
This document presents a project on designing and building a spark plug testing machine. A group of 5 students designed the machine under the guidance of Mr. V. Ganesh. The machine tests spark plugs by checking if they are accepting current and firing properly. It can also clean and repair spark plugs. The design includes specifications like a working air pressure of 5-16 kg/cm2 and a power supply of 220V AC with an output voltage of 12-19kv. Regular testing and replacement of underperforming spark plugs provides benefits like lower emissions, better fuel economy, and trouble-free engine operation. The machine allows for efficient testing of spark plugs.
This document proposes a system to generate electricity from a stationary bicycle located in a gymnasium. The system uses the mechanical energy produced from pedaling the bicycle to power an alternator connected via a belt drive. The alternator generates AC power that is rectified to DC and stored in a battery. The DC power can then be inverted back to AC to power electrical loads when needed. The system aims to conserve energy and reduce pollution by harnessing unused human power during exercise. It provides a renewable source of small-scale electricity generation without reliance on sunlight. The document describes the components, working, advantages and disadvantages of the proposed system.
Similar to Potential Difference Inc. MAGNA International ReGenX & BiTT Presentation (20)
Hartwick National Research Council of Canada Dec. 2009 ReGen-X Generator Test(1)Thane Heins
The document summarizes tests of a regenerative acceleration concentric E coil performed by NRC scientist Doug Hartwick on December 15, 2009. It shows that with a 10 ohm load, the regenerative coil reduced prime mover input by 40.2% while increasing output power by over 200% compared to a conventional generator. It also found that at full prime mover speed, the regenerative coil produced over 16 Watts of output while reducing prime mover power consumption by 62%, whereas the conventional coil produced no output. The conclusions were that the regenerative coil delivers load power with zero increase in prime mover power, allowing infinite conversion efficiency.
BiTT Test Dr. Fusina Defence Research and Development Canada Bi-Toroid Trans...Thane Heins
Dr. Giovani Fusina conducted an experiment measuring voltage, current, frequency, power, and efficiency at various input voltages for a bi-transformer setup between a Defence Research and Development Canada lab and Ottawa University. The document reports the measured and calculated values for input voltage, input current, frequency, load voltage, load resistance, input power, load power, load to input power ratio, and efficiency at different input voltages ranging from 30V to 144.3V.
A Global Terrorist Problem and a Peaceful Canadian SolutionThane Heins
Cloud seeding is a form of weather modification that has been researched since the 1940s. It involves injecting particles like silver iodide into clouds to act as freezing nuclei to induce precipitation. While some experiments showed promise, results have been inconclusive. Concerns include the possibility of uncontrolled floods or prolonged droughts. Cloud seeding continues today and may be used to increase snowfall or dissipate fog. However, its effects are still debated and it remains a controversial practice.
Open Letter to Dr. Marc Garneau, Liberal Party of CanadaThane Heins
The document is a letter informing Dr. Garneau about a RCMP investigation into illegal heavy metal jet aerosol spraying in Canada and introducing Potential Difference Inc's clean energy innovations, including a Bi-Toroid Transformer and Regenerative Acceleration Generator that can achieve infinite efficiency. These innovations would make motives for the jet spraying like global warming mitigation or population culling moot and could replace future energy wars. Test results and videos demonstrating the technologies are provided.
The document is an open letter to the Prime Minister of Canada regarding a new clean energy innovation discovered in Canada. It summarizes that the innovation allows electric vehicles to recharge themselves as they drive, eliminating the need for plug-in charging. The innovation has been validated by experts from universities including MIT and the University of Ottawa. It has generated interest from many major companies in the automotive and energy industries.
The document is an open letter to the Prime Minister regarding a discovery of a technology that allows electric vehicles to recharge themselves while driving, eliminating the need for plug-in charging. It describes the technology being developed in Canada and validated by experts. It outlines commercialization opportunities with many major companies in transportation and energy and validations of the technology by scientists and engineers.
118 recorded chemtrails june 20 over ottawa, kanata, almonte, carleton place,...Thane Heins
On June 20th, 2013 over 118 planes were observed spraying chemical trails over Ottawa and surrounding areas between 7am and 7pm, with planes coming every 10 minutes and often in groups of 3-4. A military spokesperson claimed they were commercial planes and contrails can last for hours, but it is very unusual to see 71 commercial jets in one area in a single day. The chemicals being sprayed, such as aluminum, barium and strontium, are designed to reflect sunlight and can refract light under certain conditions, contradicting claims that they are simply contrails.
Bi-Toroid Transformer Performance vs Conventional EI TransformerThane Heins
The Bi-Toroid Transformer (BiTT) innovation outperforms conventional transformers because the BiTT primary consumes almost pure reactive power only but delivers real power to the load.
In addition the BiTT uses Secondary Coil BEMF induced magnetic flux to maintain power through the load and as a result Primary Current and Primary Coil temperature do not increase from no-load to on-load.
This document provides a disclosure for a regenerative acceleration generator patent. It describes improvements to electrical generator efficiency by utilizing a Regenerative Acceleration (ReGen-X) coil design. The ReGen-X coil is able to delay current flow until the generator's rotor reaches top dead center, where inductive reactance is minimized. This allows the coil's magnetic field to assist rather than resist the rotor's motion, increasing efficiency by reducing the external torque required. The document provides background on conventional generator operation and explains how the ReGen-X coil design is able to reverse the decelerative effects of Lenz's Law by delaying current flow internally through capacitive energy storage in the coil windings.
P di regenerative acceleration generator (re genx) 2013 patent disclosureThane Heins
This document provides a disclosure for a regenerative acceleration generator patent. It describes improvements to electrical generator efficiency by utilizing a Regenerative Acceleration (ReGen-X) coil design. The ReGen-X coil is able to delay current flow until the generator's rotor reaches top dead center, where inductive reactance is minimized. This allows the coil's magnetic field to assist rather than resist the rotor's motion, increasing efficiency by reducing the torque needed from the prime mover. The document provides background on conventional generator operation and explains how the ReGen-X coil design functions to reverse the decelerating effects of armature reaction through delayed current flow and flux harvesting between multiple coils.
Potential Difference IP Licensing Model1Thane Heins
This document outlines a cooperative business model proposed by Potential Difference Inc. for licensing their regenerative acceleration generator technology. The model is based on Nobel Prize-winning economic theory that competition is unsustainable and cooperation is necessary for long-term success. The model aims to create a network of licensees and distributors who support each other's abilities through free initial licensing agreements and equitable revenue sharing of future developments. The goal is for participating members to add value to the cooperative network over time while reducing Potential Difference's revenue share to encourage growth.
A CONVENIENT TRUTH - An Alternative Solution to the Global ChemTrail AgendaThane Heins
Potential Difference Inc. has developed three new energy innovations that make global warming moot: 1) A ReGenX Generator that can accelerate itself and produce infinite electrical power compared to conventional generators; 2) A Bi-Toroid Transformer that operates with infinite efficiency and only consumes reactive power while delivering real power; 3) A ReGenX Motor that can recapture all magnetic flux and produce torque with zero net power consumption. Independent third party tests confirm the innovations. The technologies are now being commercialized globally.
An Alternative Solution to the Global ChemTrail Geo Engineering AgendaThane Heins
Potential Difference Inc. has developed three new energy innovations that make global warming moot: 1) The ReGenX Generator accelerates under load and delivers over 800% more power than conventional generators; 2) The Bi-Toroid Transformer consumes only reactive power but delivers real power at over 450% efficiency; 3) The ReGenX Motor recaptures magnetic flux and produces torque with zero net power consumption. Independent third party tests of the innovations were conducted at the University of Ottawa.
A CONVENIENT TRUTH - Mother Earth Day 2013... global warming, the beginning o...Thane Heins
Potential Difference Inc has developed three new energy innovations that make global warming issues moot:
1. A ReGenX Generator that can accelerate itself under load and deliver infinite electrical power compared to conventional generators.
2. A Bi-Toroid Transformer that operates with infinite efficiency and only consumes reactive power but delivers real power.
3. A ReGen-X Motor that can recapture all motor coil flux and produce torque with zero net power consumption.
UN Ban on ChemTrail / Geo Engineering 2010Thane Heins
The UN Convention on Biological Diversity reached a consensus agreement establishing a de facto moratorium on geoengineering projects and experiments. This builds on a 2008 moratorium on ocean fertilization experiments. The decision means that any public or private geoengineering activities that have not considered environmental and biodiversity risks would be in violation of the UN agreement. It places governance of geoengineering issues within the UN framework rather than independent initiatives. While not a perfect agreement, it puts climate-altering technologies on the UN agenda for further deliberation where all countries have a voice.
BiTT JLN Labs_Report Independent Third Party Test FRANCEThane Heins
The document describes Jean-Louis Naudin's replication and testing of the Bi-Toroid Transformer (BiTT) invented by Thane C. Heins of Potential Difference Inc. It details Naudin's goals to validate key claims about the BiTT and his various tests from February to March 2013 that confirmed the device's unusual behavior of using reactive power instead of active power even when loads are added. His conclusions were that the BiTT effect was successfully replicated and that potential efficiency gains are possible by reducing core losses.
The document describes Jean-Louis Naudin's replication and testing of Thane C. Heins' Regenerative Acceleration Generator (ReGenX) invention. It details Naudin's tests from February to March 2013 where he successfully built a replication of the ReGenX and measured the Regenerative Acceleration Effect. His tests showed that RPM increased and power input decreased under various loads, and that the effect was cumulative with additional loaded coils. He concluded that the Regenerative Acceleration Effect described by Heins was real based on his replication and measurements.
Kinectrics Draft Report With Over 100 Errors k 01[1]Thane Heins
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help boost feelings of calmness, happiness and focus.
Regenerative Acceleration Generator Technology Third Party ValidationThane Heins
The document describes a regenerative acceleration generator (ReGenX) technology created by Potential +/- Difference Inc. that allows electric vehicles to recharge their batteries while driving or accelerating. Several tests of the technology were conducted by independent third parties and labs, with positive results. The technology has piqued the interest of automakers, government agencies, and academics. However, some experts note it appears to violate laws of physics and more study is needed to understand how it works.
How to Eliminate Transformer Cooling Requirements Using Bi-Toroid Transformer...Thane Heins
The document describes a new transformer called the Bi-Toroid Transformer (BiTT) that is more efficient than conventional transformers. The BiTT redirects magnetic flux from the secondary coil in a way that minimizes heat loss in the primary coil. This makes the on-load power requirement for the primary coil less than or equal to the no-load requirement. Videos demonstrate the BiTT decreasing primary coil input under load. The BiTT has potential applications for electric vehicles and satellite ion propulsion systems.
How to Eliminate Transformer Cooling Requirements Using Bi-Toroid Transformer...
Potential Difference Inc. MAGNA International ReGenX & BiTT Presentation
1. Potential +/- Difference Inc.
Regenerative Acceleration
Generator Technology
Demonstration
University of Ottawa Lab
2. Demo Test # 1
Conventional Generator vs.
Regenerative Acceleration Generator Technology
The Regenerative Acceleration Generator is very similar to
any conventional generator but it also employs extra high
voltage coils to counteract and reverse the effects of
armature reaction (or Lenz’s Law) inside the generator.
3. Demo Test # 1
Conventional Generator vs.
Regenerative Acceleration Generator Technology
• When a conventional generator • When the Regenerative Acceleration
delivers power to a load (light bulb) the Generator delivers power to the same
generator causes the motor (prime load (light bulb) NOW the generator
mover) to decelerate. causes the motor to accelerate.
• In the above photo the motor is • Now the motor is consuming the least
consuming the maximum power but power while the generator is delivering
delivering virtually no power. the maximum power.
• Rotor speed is only 100 RPM. • Rotor speed is maximum at 3500
RPM.
4. Demo Test # 1
Conventional Generator vs.
Regenerative Acceleration Generator Technology
• INPUT POWER REDUCTION = 41%
• OUTPUT POWER INCREASE = 373%
• The Regenerative Acceleration
Generator has the proven ability to
increase generator output energy by
more than 373% over a conventional
generator while at the same time
decreasing motor input energy by 41%.
5. Demo Test # 2
Regenerative Acceleration Generator Optimization
Further Regenerative Acceleration Generator developments include the
optimization of the high voltage coils to deliver increased generator output
power with system acceleration and the elimination of the high current coils.
6. Demo Test # 2
Regenerative Acceleration Generator Optimization
• NO LOAD CONDITION
• At full speed and with no load on
the generator the system’s steady
state speed is 3433 RPM.
• The prime mover is consuming
166 Watts.
• The generator is turned off and
delivering 0 Watts.
7. Demo Test # 2
Regenerative Acceleration Generator Optimization
• ON LOAD CONDITION
• Now the generator is turned on,
delivering 31 Watts to the load
(light bulbs).
• The generator has accelerated the
motor 11 RPM up to 3444 RPM
from the no load speed of 3433
RPM.
• The motor input power has
decreased by 6 Watts down to 160
Watts from the previous 166 Watt
no load condition.
• Currently only two coils are
employed but the rotor can
accommodate at least 33.
8. Demo Test # 3
Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs.
Conventional Generator
• Now a conventional generator coil
has been added (gold & green
coil).
• The conventional generator coil is
mounted on the opposite side of
the rotor and employs 6 poles
(magnets).
• We will compare the conventional
generator reaction to loading vs.
the regenerative acceleration
generator performance.
9. Demo Test # 3
Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs.
Conventional Generator
• NO LOAD CONDITION
• Motor Power = 282 Watts
• Steady State Speed = 3283 RPM
10. Demo Test # 3
Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs.
Conventional Generator
• ON LOAD CONDITION
CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR
• Conventional generator delivers
6.4 Watts to the load (light bulb).
• Motor power consumption
increases 10 Watts to 293 Watts.
• Speed decreases 21 RPM to 3262
RPM.
11. Demo Test # 3
Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs.
Conventional Generator
• ON LOAD CONDITION
CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR
and ReGenX GENERATOR
• Both conventional generator and
regenerative acceleration
generators are now delivering
power to their loads.
• Conventional generator delivers
6.4 Watts
• Regenerative acceleration
generator delivers 37.4 Watts
• Motor power has decreased 19
Watts down to 274 Watts
• Speed has increased 49 RPM up
to 3311 RPM.
12. Demo Test # 3
Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs.
Conventional Generator
• CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR
OFF LOAD
• ReGenX GENERATOR ON
LOAD.
• Now the conventional generator
has been turned off.
• The regenerative acceleration
generator output increases to 39
Watts.
• Motor power decreases 15 Watts
down to 259 Watts.
• Speed increases to 3334 RPM.
13. Demo Test # 3
Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs.
Conventional Generator
• PERFORMANCE COMPARISON SUMMARY
• Conventional generator on load alone delivers an output 6.35 Watts with a
corresponding prime mover power input increase of 4% or 11 Watts.
• Regenerative acceleration generator and conventional generator on load
deliver a combined output of 43.8 Watts with a prime mover input
reduction of 19 Watts.
• This represents a 589% output power increase with a 6.5% input power
decrease.
• Regenerative acceleration generator alone delivers a 498% output power
increase over the conventional generator alone with a 11.6% decrease in
prime mover input.
14. Demo Test # 3
Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs.
Conventional Generator
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON SUMMARY
Generator Type Output Power Armature Reaction
Input Increase / Decrease
Conventional 6.35 W 11 Watt
Generator Increase
Regenerative 43.8 W 19 Watt
Acceleration Decrease
Generator
15. Potential +/- Difference Inc.
Bi-Toroid Transformer Technology
Demonstration
University of Ottawa Lab
16. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
• Conventional transformer NO
LOAD.
• Coil current = 71 mA
• Power factor = 0
• Load voltage = 0 volts
17. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
• Conventional transformer ON LOAD.
• Coil current = 139 mA
• Power factor = 1
• Load voltage = 3.6 volts
18. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
• Bi-Toroid Transformer NO
LOAD.
• Coil current = 130 mA
• Power factor = 0
• Load voltage = 0 volts
19. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
• Bi-Toroid Transformer ON
LOAD.
• Coil current = 130 mA
• Power factor = 0
• Load voltage = 1.6 volts
20. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
ON LOAD NO LOAD ON LOAD
Conventional Transformer Bi-Toroid Transformer Bi-Toroid Transformer
Power Factor = 1 Power Factor = 0 Power Factor = 0
21. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
Primary Coil Current and Power Factor Comparison
Conventional Conventional Bi-Toroid Bi-Toroid
Transformer Transformer Transformer Transformer
NO Load ON Load NO Load ON Load
Current 71 139 130 130
mA
Power 0 1 0 0
Factor
22. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
Bi-Toroid Transformer NO LOAD Bi-Toroid Transformer ON LOAD
The above photo-data show the power factor (Pf) of the Bi-Toroid
transformer with an increased 18.5 input voltage.
The power factor is virtually unchanged.
23. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
• Although it is hard to believe the above left close up scope shot is
the Bi-Toroid NO LOAD and the right is ON LOAD.
• There is a slight 25% increase in primary coil current (100 mA) with
the higher input voltage although the power factor is virtually zero.
24. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
Conventional Transformer ON LOAD
With an increased 18.5 volt input to the primary coil, the conventional
transformer’s purely resistive load dictates the primary coil’s power
factor of 1 and the primary current quadruples.
25. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
• In the conventional transformer,
the primary coil delivers flux to
the secondary coil via the
transformer’s ferromagnetic core.
• A voltage is induced in the
secondary coil.
• On no load, the primary coil’s
voltage and current are 90
degrees out of phase and only
reactive power exists in the
primary coil.
• Primary Real Power = 0
26. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
• When the secondary coil is placed
on load, current flows in the coil.
• This current produces a secondary
induced flux (blue) which couples
back to the primary coil.
• This secondary flux reduces the
primary coil’s impedance (AC
resistance) and more source current
enters the primary coil.
• The increase in primary current
increases the primary flux (red) and
this flux increase maintains the
voltage across the load.
• The load power factor is transferred
back to the primary and now real
power is consumed in the primary
coil.
27. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
28. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
• In the Bi-Toroid transformer the primary flux is divided between the two
secondary coils – Secondary 1 and Secondary 2.
• Voltages are induced in both secondary coils.
• The primary coil’s voltage and current are 90 degrees out of phase and only
reactive power exists in the primary coil.
• Primary Real Power = 0 Watts.
29. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
30. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
• When the Bi-Toroid transformer is placed on load the secondary induced fluxes DO
NOT enter the primary core leg due to its higher reluctance (magnetic resistance).
• Instead Secondary 1’s flux enters Secondary 2 and vise versa and the coils self
regulate their own voltages across the loads.
• Real power is delivered to the loads.
• Primary Real Power = 0 Watts.
31. Demo Test # 4
Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON SUMMARY
Transformer Type No Load On Load
Conventional Primary draws Primary draws
Transformer reactive power real power
power factor
mirrors load
Bi-Toroid Primary draws Primary draws
Transformer reactive power reactive power
power factor
ignores load
32. Potential +/- Difference Inc.
Thane Heins
President and CEO
Potential Difference Inc.
613.795.1602 cell
thaneh@potentialdifference.ca