Western Political Thought
            Dr. John Paul Tabakian
                  Political Science 5
       Fall 2012 – Power Point #10
COURSE LECTURE: WEEK 10 (1)
Today’s Lecture Covers The Following:
• Taxes
• Cosmopolitanism
• Manifest Destiny
• American Foreign Policy
• Realism
• Idealism
COURSE LECTURE: WEEK 10 (2)
•   Social Theories
•   Collective Security
•   The Waning Of War
•   Peace Studies
•   Democratic Peace Theory
•   Kant & Peace
•   Liberal Institutionalism
•   Liberal Challenge to Realism
     – International Regimes
COURSE LECTURE: WEEK 10 (3)
•   Why Gender Matters
•   Gender In War & Peace
•   Women In IR
•   Constructivism / Rationalism
•   Constructivism / Feminism
•   Postmodernism
•   Marxism & Gender Theories Like Feminism
TAXES

• From tariffs to income tax
  • 16th Amendment passed in 1913
• Progressive Tax System
  • Guiding societal norms of behavior
  • Deductions, penalties
• Social Welfare Programs
  • We are all on the welfare dime….everyone!
REALISM

• Human nature is the predominant
  factor in a nation-state’s foreign policy.
• Abrupt philosophy focused on the
  inherent evils of mankind.
• World is wrought with anarchy.
• Hard power: economic & military.
• Survival is the key!
RATIONAL CHOICE

• People base their decisions according
  to self-interest…as they define that
  self-interest to be.
• Making a rational choice requires
  perfect information.
• Emotions interfere with rational choice.
LIBERAL THEORIES

• Realism offers mostly dominance solutions
  to the collective goods problems of IR.
• Alternative theoretical approaches that draw
  mostly on the reciprocity or identity principles
  are called liberal theories.
• These approaches are generally more
  optimistic than realism about the prospects
  for peace.
LIBERAL INSTITUTIONALISM

• Liberal institutionalism cannot adequately
  explain how to maintain a stable international
  system in a post-Cold War world.
COLLECTIVE SECURITY (1)

• John J. Mearsheimer lists nine reasons why states
  may be unwilling to base their fate on collective
  security systems:
   1. Can only work when states are able to
      differentiate between aggressor and victim and
      utilize force against the later.
   2. Collective security assumes that all aggression
      is wrong.
   3. States may be for historical or ideological
      reasons, overly friendly.
COLLECTIVE SECURITY (2)

• Concept grows out of liberal institutionalism.
• Refers to the formation of a broad alliance of most
  major actors in an international system for the purpose
  of jointly opposing aggression by any actor.
   – Kant
   – League of Nations
   – Organization of America States, Arab League, and
     the African Union
COLLECTIVE SECURITY (3)

 4. States that have shared hostile relations in the
    past may not be willing to cooperate.
 5. States that agree to combat aggression may
    not be able to distribute the burden associated
    with doing so.
 6. States have difficulty reacting quickly in a
    collective security system.
 7. States may not be willing to join a collective
    security system, as a local conflict can become
    international.
COLLECTIVE SECURITY (3)

 8. Forcing states to instantaneously react to
    aggression impinges on state sovereignty.
 9. Responsible states that normally see war as
    repellent may not be willing to rescue
    threatened states.
THE WANING OF WAR

• In recent years, a strong trend toward fewer wars
  has become evident.
   • The current period is one of the least warlike
     ever.
   • World wars killed left whole continents in ruin.
   • Cold War – proxy wars killed millions and the
     world feared a nuclear war that could have
     wiped out our species.
INTERNATIONAL REGIMES

• Set of rules, norms, and procedures around which
  the expectations of actors converge in a certain
  issue area.
   • Participants have similar ideas about what rules
     will govern their mutual participation.
• Regimes can help solve collective goods problems
  by increasing transparency.
• Conception of regime.
• Enforcement and survival of regimes.
   • Role of permanent institutions such as the UN,
     NATO, and the IMF.
PEACE STUDIES (1)

• Criticism: normative bias
• Conflict resolution
  – Mediation
  – Citizen diplomacy
  – Arbitration
  – Confidence-building
  – Linkage
PEACE STUDIES (2)

• Criticism: normative bias
• Conflict resolution
  – Mediation
  – Citizen diplomacy
  – Arbitration
  – Confidence-building
  – Linkage
KANT & PEACE (1)

• What explains this positive trend toward peace?
• Kant gave 3 answers over 200 years ago:
  1.States could develop the organizations and rules
    to facilitate cooperation (UN).
  2.Peace depends on the internal character of
    governments - specifically republics, with a
    legislative branch.
  3.Trade promotes peace, relies on the
    presumption that trade increases wealth,
    cooperation, and global well-being.
KANT & PEACE (2)

• Kant argued that states could join a worldwide
  federation and respect its principles.
   • Remain autonomous
   • But forego certain short-term individual gains
• Kant: International cooperation more rational option
  than going to war.
   • To realists, war is a rational option; to liberal
     theorists, war is an irrational deviation that
     results from defective reasoning and that harms
     the interests of warring states.
KANT & PEACE (3)

• Neoliberal approach differs from earlier liberal
  approaches in that it concedes to realism several
  important assumptions:
   • States are unitary actors rationally pursuing their
     self-interests, but they say states cooperate
     because it is in their self-interest.
   • Mutual gains better than cheating or taking
     advantage of each other.
   • State that neorealist’ pessimism is unjustified.
     States cooperate MOST of the time.
   • Positive reciprocity
WHY GENDER MATTERS

• Feminist scholarship seeks to uncover hidden
  assumptions about gender.
   • Core assumptions of realism reflect the ways in
     which males tend see the world.
   • No such thing as a “feminist approach” to IR.
      • Difference feminism: gender differences
        important and fixed
      • Liberal feminism: gender differences are trivial
      • Postmodern feminism: gender differences
        important but arbitrary and flexible
GENDER IN WAR AND PEACE

• Difference feminists find plenty of evidence to
  support the idea of war as a masculine pursuit.
   • Males usually the primary, and often only,
     combatants in warfare.
   • Testosterone.
• Both biologically and anthropologically, no firm
  evidence connects women’s care giving functions
  with any particular kinds of behavior such as
  reconciliation or nonviolence.
• Idea of women as peacemakers has a long history.
• Gender gap.

Political Science 5 – Western Political Thought - Power Point #10

  • 1.
    Western Political Thought Dr. John Paul Tabakian Political Science 5 Fall 2012 – Power Point #10
  • 2.
    COURSE LECTURE: WEEK10 (1) Today’s Lecture Covers The Following: • Taxes • Cosmopolitanism • Manifest Destiny • American Foreign Policy • Realism • Idealism
  • 3.
    COURSE LECTURE: WEEK10 (2) • Social Theories • Collective Security • The Waning Of War • Peace Studies • Democratic Peace Theory • Kant & Peace • Liberal Institutionalism • Liberal Challenge to Realism – International Regimes
  • 4.
    COURSE LECTURE: WEEK10 (3) • Why Gender Matters • Gender In War & Peace • Women In IR • Constructivism / Rationalism • Constructivism / Feminism • Postmodernism • Marxism & Gender Theories Like Feminism
  • 5.
    TAXES • From tariffsto income tax • 16th Amendment passed in 1913 • Progressive Tax System • Guiding societal norms of behavior • Deductions, penalties • Social Welfare Programs • We are all on the welfare dime….everyone!
  • 6.
    REALISM • Human natureis the predominant factor in a nation-state’s foreign policy. • Abrupt philosophy focused on the inherent evils of mankind. • World is wrought with anarchy. • Hard power: economic & military. • Survival is the key!
  • 7.
    RATIONAL CHOICE • Peoplebase their decisions according to self-interest…as they define that self-interest to be. • Making a rational choice requires perfect information. • Emotions interfere with rational choice.
  • 8.
    LIBERAL THEORIES • Realismoffers mostly dominance solutions to the collective goods problems of IR. • Alternative theoretical approaches that draw mostly on the reciprocity or identity principles are called liberal theories. • These approaches are generally more optimistic than realism about the prospects for peace.
  • 9.
    LIBERAL INSTITUTIONALISM • Liberalinstitutionalism cannot adequately explain how to maintain a stable international system in a post-Cold War world.
  • 10.
    COLLECTIVE SECURITY (1) •John J. Mearsheimer lists nine reasons why states may be unwilling to base their fate on collective security systems: 1. Can only work when states are able to differentiate between aggressor and victim and utilize force against the later. 2. Collective security assumes that all aggression is wrong. 3. States may be for historical or ideological reasons, overly friendly.
  • 11.
    COLLECTIVE SECURITY (2) •Concept grows out of liberal institutionalism. • Refers to the formation of a broad alliance of most major actors in an international system for the purpose of jointly opposing aggression by any actor. – Kant – League of Nations – Organization of America States, Arab League, and the African Union
  • 12.
    COLLECTIVE SECURITY (3) 4. States that have shared hostile relations in the past may not be willing to cooperate. 5. States that agree to combat aggression may not be able to distribute the burden associated with doing so. 6. States have difficulty reacting quickly in a collective security system. 7. States may not be willing to join a collective security system, as a local conflict can become international.
  • 13.
    COLLECTIVE SECURITY (3) 8. Forcing states to instantaneously react to aggression impinges on state sovereignty. 9. Responsible states that normally see war as repellent may not be willing to rescue threatened states.
  • 14.
    THE WANING OFWAR • In recent years, a strong trend toward fewer wars has become evident. • The current period is one of the least warlike ever. • World wars killed left whole continents in ruin. • Cold War – proxy wars killed millions and the world feared a nuclear war that could have wiped out our species.
  • 15.
    INTERNATIONAL REGIMES • Setof rules, norms, and procedures around which the expectations of actors converge in a certain issue area. • Participants have similar ideas about what rules will govern their mutual participation. • Regimes can help solve collective goods problems by increasing transparency. • Conception of regime. • Enforcement and survival of regimes. • Role of permanent institutions such as the UN, NATO, and the IMF.
  • 16.
    PEACE STUDIES (1) •Criticism: normative bias • Conflict resolution – Mediation – Citizen diplomacy – Arbitration – Confidence-building – Linkage
  • 17.
    PEACE STUDIES (2) •Criticism: normative bias • Conflict resolution – Mediation – Citizen diplomacy – Arbitration – Confidence-building – Linkage
  • 18.
    KANT & PEACE(1) • What explains this positive trend toward peace? • Kant gave 3 answers over 200 years ago: 1.States could develop the organizations and rules to facilitate cooperation (UN). 2.Peace depends on the internal character of governments - specifically republics, with a legislative branch. 3.Trade promotes peace, relies on the presumption that trade increases wealth, cooperation, and global well-being.
  • 19.
    KANT & PEACE(2) • Kant argued that states could join a worldwide federation and respect its principles. • Remain autonomous • But forego certain short-term individual gains • Kant: International cooperation more rational option than going to war. • To realists, war is a rational option; to liberal theorists, war is an irrational deviation that results from defective reasoning and that harms the interests of warring states.
  • 20.
    KANT & PEACE(3) • Neoliberal approach differs from earlier liberal approaches in that it concedes to realism several important assumptions: • States are unitary actors rationally pursuing their self-interests, but they say states cooperate because it is in their self-interest. • Mutual gains better than cheating or taking advantage of each other. • State that neorealist’ pessimism is unjustified. States cooperate MOST of the time. • Positive reciprocity
  • 21.
    WHY GENDER MATTERS •Feminist scholarship seeks to uncover hidden assumptions about gender. • Core assumptions of realism reflect the ways in which males tend see the world. • No such thing as a “feminist approach” to IR. • Difference feminism: gender differences important and fixed • Liberal feminism: gender differences are trivial • Postmodern feminism: gender differences important but arbitrary and flexible
  • 22.
    GENDER IN WARAND PEACE • Difference feminists find plenty of evidence to support the idea of war as a masculine pursuit. • Males usually the primary, and often only, combatants in warfare. • Testosterone. • Both biologically and anthropologically, no firm evidence connects women’s care giving functions with any particular kinds of behavior such as reconciliation or nonviolence. • Idea of women as peacemakers has a long history. • Gender gap.