This document provides a summary of a presentation given by Adam Gosling on policy development at APNIC. It begins with an introduction of APNIC as the regional internet registry for the Asia Pacific region and describes its role and multistakeholder policy development process. It then discusses recent policy proposals that reached consensus, including on distributing returned IPv4 addresses and transferring AS numbers. The presentation concludes with an overview of APNIC's involvement in the broader internet governance landscape and collaborations with organizations like the NRO and engagement with governments.
Keynote presentation on the Internet of Things given by Paul Wilson, Director General at APNIC, at the inaugural Taiwan Internet Forum, held in Taipei, Taiwan from 8 December 2015
APNIC Report as presented by Guangliang Pan at ARIN's Public Policy and Members Meeting in April 2014. All ARIN 33 presentations are posted online at: https://www.arin.net/ARIN33_materials
Keynote presentation on the Internet of Things given by Paul Wilson, Director General at APNIC, at the inaugural Taiwan Internet Forum, held in Taipei, Taiwan from 8 December 2015
APNIC Report as presented by Guangliang Pan at ARIN's Public Policy and Members Meeting in April 2014. All ARIN 33 presentations are posted online at: https://www.arin.net/ARIN33_materials
Presented by Sunny Chendi at the 30th South Asia Network Operators Group (SANOG) conference – SANOG 30 - held in Gurgaon, India, from 10 to 18 July 2017.
See4 RIPE vs RIPE NCC from the beginning to after the NTIA transitionHans Petter Holen
Walking trough the history of RIPE and RIPE NCC, the CRISP proposal and how the values of RIPE with bottom-up, open and inclusive is reflected in the proposal. Simply speaking we move from a structure where the IANA operator operates under a contract with the US Governments to a structure where the IANA Numbering Services operator would operate under a contract with the RIRs as mandated by, and under oversight of, their members and communities.
32nd TWNIC IP OPM: Another APNIC Policy UpdateAPNIC
George Kuo gives a presentation on the APNIC Policy Development Process, why participation is important, and recent policy proposal implementations at the 32nd TWNIC IP OPM in Taipei from 20 to 21 June 2019.
2nd ICANN APAC-TWNIC Engagement Forum: APNIC Policy Framework and Development...APNIC
APNIC Senior Advisor Policy and Community Development Sunny Chendi presents on the APNIC PDP and policy framework at the 2nd ICANN APAC-TWNIC Engagement Forum held from 15 to 16 April 2021.
Presented by Sunny Chendi at the 30th South Asia Network Operators Group (SANOG) conference – SANOG 30 - held in Gurgaon, India, from 10 to 18 July 2017.
See4 RIPE vs RIPE NCC from the beginning to after the NTIA transitionHans Petter Holen
Walking trough the history of RIPE and RIPE NCC, the CRISP proposal and how the values of RIPE with bottom-up, open and inclusive is reflected in the proposal. Simply speaking we move from a structure where the IANA operator operates under a contract with the US Governments to a structure where the IANA Numbering Services operator would operate under a contract with the RIRs as mandated by, and under oversight of, their members and communities.
32nd TWNIC IP OPM: Another APNIC Policy UpdateAPNIC
George Kuo gives a presentation on the APNIC Policy Development Process, why participation is important, and recent policy proposal implementations at the 32nd TWNIC IP OPM in Taipei from 20 to 21 June 2019.
2nd ICANN APAC-TWNIC Engagement Forum: APNIC Policy Framework and Development...APNIC
APNIC Senior Advisor Policy and Community Development Sunny Chendi presents on the APNIC PDP and policy framework at the 2nd ICANN APAC-TWNIC Engagement Forum held from 15 to 16 April 2021.
Senior Internet Resource Analyst Elly Tawhai gave a presentation about APNIC, the Policy Development Process, and the whois accuracy project, which ensures contact information is accurate and current at PacNOG 23 in the Marshall Islands from 3 to 7 December 2018.
APNIC Director General Paul Wilson gives an update on APNIC's activities and new service initiatives at AIS 2018, held alongside AFRINIC 28 in Dakar, Senegal, from 29 April to 11 May 2018.
APNIC Policy Roundup, presented by Sunny Chendi at the 5th ICANN APAC-TWNIC E...APNIC
Sunny Chendi, Senior Advisor, Membership and Policy at APNIC, presents 'APNIC Policy Roundup' at the 5th ICANN APAC-TWNIC Engagement Forum and 41st TWNIC OPM in Taipei, Taiwan from 23 to 24 April.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !KatiaHIMEUR1
Today, after several years of existence, an extremely active community and an ultra-dynamic ecosystem, Kubernetes has established itself as the de facto standard in container orchestration. Thanks to a wide range of managed services, it has never been so easy to set up a ready-to-use Kubernetes cluster.
However, this ease of use means that the subject of security in Kubernetes is often left for later, or even neglected. This exposes companies to significant risks.
In this talk, I'll show you step-by-step how to secure your Kubernetes cluster for greater peace of mind and reliability.
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfPaige Cruz
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
PHP Frameworks: I want to break free (IPC Berlin 2024)Ralf Eggert
In this presentation, we examine the challenges and limitations of relying too heavily on PHP frameworks in web development. We discuss the history of PHP and its frameworks to understand how this dependence has evolved. The focus will be on providing concrete tips and strategies to reduce reliance on these frameworks, based on real-world examples and practical considerations. The goal is to equip developers with the skills and knowledge to create more flexible and future-proof web applications. We'll explore the importance of maintaining autonomy in a rapidly changing tech landscape and how to make informed decisions in PHP development.
This talk is aimed at encouraging a more independent approach to using PHP frameworks, moving towards a more flexible and future-proof approach to PHP development.
Secstrike : Reverse Engineering & Pwnable tools for CTF.pptx
Policy Development Process/Internet Eco System by Adam Gosling
1. Policy Development Process
& Internet Eco-System
Adam Gosling
Senior Policy Specialist, APNIC
APNIC Regional Meeting Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
29 November 2013
1
2. Agenda
• Introduce APNIC
• APNIC Policy
• Policy Report
• Internet Ecosystem
–
–
–
–
The NRO
APNIC External Relations
LEA engagement
Recent developments
2
4. What is APNIC?
• Regional Internet Registry (RIR) for the
Asia Pacific region
– Comprises 56 economies
• Not-for-profit, membership-based
organization
• Governed by the Executive Council
(EC), who are elected by the Members
• Secretariat located in Brisbane,
Australia
– Currently employs around 70 staff
4
6. APNIC’s Vision:
A global, open, stable, and secure Internet that
serves the entire Asia Pacific community.
How we achieve this:
• Serving Members
• Supporting the Asia Pacific Region
• Collaborating with the Internet Community
6
7. APNIC’s Mission
• Function as the RIR for the Asia Pacific, in the service of the
community of Members and others
• Provide Internet registry services to the highest possible
standards of trust, neutrality, and accuracy
• Provide information, training, and supporting services to
assist the community in building and managing the Internet
• Support critical Internet infrastructure to assist in creating and
maintaining a robust Internet environment
• Provide leadership and advocacy in support of its vision and
the community
• Facilitate regional Internet development as needed throughout
the APNIC community
7
9. Internet Resource Policies
• Policies evolve to always meet the operational
needs of ISPs and other network operators
• There is a system in place called the Policy
Development Process (PDP)
– Anyone can propose a policy
– Anyone can participate in decisions
– All decisions & policies documented & freely available to
anyone
9
10. Multistakeholder policy development
• Open
– Anyone can propose, discuss, and help decide policy
• Transparent
– APNIC publicly documents all policy discussions and decisions
• Bottom up
– The PDP itself and the resource policies are determined by the
community they serve
10
11. Policy SIG Charter
• Develop policies and procedures which relate to the
management and use of Internet address resources by APNIC,
NIRs and ISPs within the Asia Pacific region
• APNIC Policy
– www.apnic.net/policy
• APNIC Policy Development Process
– www.apnic.net/policy/policy-development
• APNIC Policy SIG
– www.apnic.net/policy-sig
• SIG Guidelines
– www.apnic.net/community/sigs/sig-guidelines
• Mailing list subscription archive
– mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
11
12. Steps to Implementation
1. Proposal submission
2. Mailing list discussion before Open Policy Meeting
3. Must reach consensus at the OPM
4. Must reach consensus at the APNIC Member Meeting
5. Comment Period to confirm consensus
6. Executive Council endorsement
7. Editorial Comment period
8. Implementation
12
14. Consensus Decision Making
• Consensus = “general agreement” taking into consideration
comments on the mailing list and at the meeting.
• Show of hands is a way of “broadly gauging opinion”
• Comments via Remote Participation are welcome
• Example definitions from Tao of IETF:
– a very large majority of those who care must agree
– strongly held objections must be debated until most people are
satisfied that these objections are wrong
14
15. Remember
• Minor Objections
– some problems may occur for some members of the group
• Major Objections
– major problems will occur for parts of the community
• Participants should “work together” to resolve objections
• The Secretariat’s role in the PDP is to facilitate the PDP and
implement the policy
15
17. Policy SIG Meeting outcomes
• SIG Chair Election
– Andy Linton re-elected as Chair for 2 years
• Masato Yamanishi continues until August 2014
• Leasing discussion
– Chairs to send summary of discussion to list
• SIG Guidelines
– A discussion about SIG Hibernation – see NIR SIG report
• Three Proposals
– Prop-105: Distribution of returned IPv4 address blocks
– Prop-107: AS number transfer policy proposal
– Prop-108: Suggested changes to the APNIC Policy Development Process
17
18. Policy discussions at APNIC 36
• The following proposals reached consensus and will
progress to the 8-week comment period:
prop-105: Distribution of returned IPv4 address blocks
prop-107: AS number transfer policy proposal
• The following proposal reached consensus after some
modification and will progress to the 8-week comment
period:
prop-108: Suggested changes to the APNIC Policy
Development Process
18
19. prop-105: Distribution of returned
IPv4 address blocks
Aims:
• Make IANA returns available for distribution using a
different policy from “final /8” policy
Proposal:
• Each Member able to justify need for an additional /22
Status:
• Endorsed for implementation by the APNIC EC
19
20. prop-107: AS number transfer policy
proposal
Aims:
• This policy would permit the intra- and inter-regional
transfer of ASNs
Proposal:
• Allow transfer of ASNs based on IPv4 transfer policy
Status:
• Endorsed for implementation by the APNIC EC
20
21. prop-108: Suggested changes to the
APNIC Policy Development Process
Aims:
• A proposal to optimize and/or disambiguate procedures
carried out under the current APNIC PDP
Proposal:
• The comment period for proposals reaching consensus at
the OPM and AMM will not be shorter than four weeks but
no longer than eight weeks at the sole discretion of the SIG
Chair.
Status:
• Endorsed for implementation by the APNIC EC
21
22. Other policy changes in 2013
• Implemented:
– prop-104: Clarifying demonstrated needs requirement in IPv4 transfer
policy (Feb 2013)
– prop-101: Removing multihoming requirement for IPv6 portable
assignments (Feb 2013)
• Did not reach consensus at APNIC 35:
– prop-105: Distribution of returned IPv4 address (modification of
prop-088)
• Developed further by the author. Reached consensus at APNIC 36
– prop-106: Restricting excessive IPv4 address transfers under the
final /8 block
• Abandoned
22
23. Transferring IP Addresses
• Transfers, Mergers, Acquisitions are possible
• There are transfer policies exists to transfer IP addresses
– In the APNIC region
– Inter-RIR IPv4 Transfers
• Conditions on the source and recipient RIR will apply
• APNIC will review the status of IP allocations
23
28. The Number Resource Organization
• Celebrating 10 years
• The Vision: To be the flagship and global leader for
collaborative Internet number resource management as a
central element of an open, stable, and secure Internet.
• The Mission: To actively contribute to an open, stable, and
secure Internet, through:
– Providing and promoting a coordinated Internet number registry
system
– Being an authoritative voice on the multistakeholder model and
bottom-up policy process in Internet governance
– Coordinating and supporting the activities of the RIRs
28
29. Number Resource Organization
• Paul Wilson is serving as the Chair of the NRO EC in 2013
• Joint activities with the other four RIRs
–
–
–
–
Resource Certification
Global statistics and report publication
Internet governance
Global policy development (ICANN Address Supporting Organization)
29
31. External Relations
• Network Operator Groups (NOG)
– MyNOG, SGNOG, PACNOG, SANOG, etc.
• NIR Open Policy Meetings (OPM)
– IRINN, TWNIC, VNNIC
• Outreach on security
– 4th APT Cybersecurity Forum
– Engagement with Law Enforcement Agencies
• Collaboration with Internet (I*) organizations
–
–
–
–
–
–
ICANN
ISOC
NRO
IETF
IAB
W3C
31
32. External Relations
Regional engagements:
• APT
– APNIC has become an affiliate member
– Preparatory processes for upcoming ITU conferences
• APEC – TEL
– Development Steering Group (DSG)
– IPv6 promotion and security
• Regional and National IGF initiatives
– NetHui
– APrIGF
– AuIGF
• Pacific
– PITA
– PICISOC
32
33. External Relations
• ITU World Telecommunications Development Conference – 14
• ITU Plenipotentiary – 14
• OECD - Study on IPv6
– Geoff Huston on public policy implications of CGNs and NATs
• Montevideo Statement
–
–
–
–
–
Warned against Internet fragmentation at a national level
Expressed concern over the undermining of the trust and confidence
Need for ongoing effort to address Internet Governance challenges
Accelerating the globalization of ICANN and IANA functions
Transition to IPv6 is a top priority globally
• http://www.nro.net/news/montevideo-statement-on-the-future-of-internet-cooperation
33
35. Assisting LEAs
• APNIC has a fundamental role to play in the stability and security
of the Internet, ensuring that the services we provide such as the
APNIC Whois Database and Reverse DNS zone delegations are
accurate, reliable, and up-to-date.
• LEAs are an important segment of the APNIC community. We
collaborate, cooperate, and work together with them to ensure
the Internet remains an open, secure, and stable platform
• Data from the Whois may be a source of information for the LEAs
in our community.
• APNIC encourages the LEAs to participate in the APNIC Policy
Development Process, and have your voices heard on issues
that are important to you!
35
36. Training and capacity building
APNIC provides
training and capacity
building to law
enforcement
agencies in the
APNIC service
region, in
collaboration with
country-code top
level domain name
managers in region
36
38. Internet governance landscape
• During the last thirty years, we have seen the Internet and
its coordination structures develop in an open, bottom-up,
and multistakeholder environment
• It is just in the last few years that the Internet has received
increased attention from governments
– Internet seen as a critical infrastructure
– Growing concerns about the consequences of cybercrime
• Some recognize the current successes, others support an
intergovernmental model
– Ongoing discussions
38
39. Global Multistakeholder Meeting on
Internet Governance
• 23 - 24 April Sao Paulo, Brazil
– The meeting will aim to produce universal internet principles and an
institutional framework for multistakeholder Internet governance. The
framework will include a roadmap to evolve and globalize current
institutions, and new mechanisms to address the emerging Internet
governance topics.
• Multistakeholder representation
– Private Enterprise, Technical Community, Civil Society, Academia,
and Governments
• The meeting will allow face-to-face and remote participation
of the global community
– Mechanism and deadline for inputs yet to be be established
– Likely to be 1 March, 2014.
40. Four Meeting Committees
• Led by the Brazilian Internet Steering Committee (CGI.br) and
Internet governance community
– Prof. Virgílio Fernandes Almeida, Coordinator of the Brazilian Internet
Steering Committee and Secretary for Informatics Policies
• The four meeting committees are:
– High-Level Multistakeholder Committee: Responsible for conducting the
political articulation and fostering the involvement of the international
community.
– Executive Multistakeholder Committee: Responsible for organizing the
event, including the agenda discussion and execution, and for the
treatment of the proposals from participants and different stakeholders;
– Logistics and Organizational Committee: Responsible for overseeing
every logistic aspect of the meeting;
– Governmental Advisory Committee: Will stay open to all governments
which want to contribute to the meeting.
40
41. 1net.org and the i-coordination list
• Created the I* organizations to prepare for the Brazil
meeting
– ISOC Announcement
• Headed by the head of AFRINIC
– Adiel A. Akplogan, CEO at AfriNIC
– Website:
– 1net.org
• A mailing list to get input from the community
– https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/i-coordination
41
42. Panel on the Future of Global Internet
Cooperation
• Chair: Estonian President Toomas Ilves
• First meeting 12 – 13 December in London, England
• Report in early 2014 for public comment
– principles for global Internet cooperation, proposed frameworks for
such cooperation and a roadmap for future Internet governance
challenges
• ICANN will organize the secretariat and provide logistical
support
– www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-17nov13en.htm
42
43. External Relations
• APNIC is actively involved in the evolution of the
multistakeholder model
– Importance of the IGF after WSIS
– Collaboration with other I* organizations: ICANN (ASO), NRO, ISOC
– Support to the Internet community: NOGs and OPMs
• APNIC has engaged actively with governments and
intergovernmental organizations:
– Globally: ITU and OECD
– Regionally: APT, APEC TEL
– Also has started collaboration with LEAs
43
44. Questions are welcome
adam@apnic.net
@boutpolicy
This document is uncontrolled when printed. Before use, check the APNIC electronic master
document to verify that this is the current version.
Issue Date: [29 November 2013]
Rev: [01]
44