1
People’s Survival Fund:
Overview and Status
Antonio L. Fernandez
Sr. Coordinator for the People’s Survival Fund
Climate Change Commission/Office of the President
Philippines
National Adaptation Program (NAP) Global Network Targeted Topics Forum
March 15-17, 2016, Kingston, Jamaica
Outline
I. Contextual background
II. Sources of Climate Finance Support
III. Details about the People’s Survival Fund
A. Legal & Policy Framework
B. Uses of the Fund
C. Prioritization of Fund Allocation
D. Institutional Structure
E. Project Evaluation Process
F. Evaluation Guidelines
G. Status
H. Fund Utilization
IV. Way Forward
I. Contextual background
• Government system: Republic
• Geographic location: Pacific typhoon belt,
Pacific Rim of Fire, Coral Triangle
• Extreme events e.g. typhoon Ondoy (2009)
• Related laws: RA10121-National Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Act of 2010
NDRRMP; RA 9729-Climate Change Act of
2009 NCCCAP
• Local autonomy of local government units
(LGUs)
Sources of CCA/DRR funds
GoP
Government
Appropriations Act: PHP
2,606 B
Regular department
budgets
NDRRM Fund: PHP 14 B
(30% for QRF)
People’s Survival Fund
(PHP 1B)
Internal Revenue Allotment
(10%) for Local
Government Units
Local Disaster Risk
Reduction & Management
Fund (30% for QRF)
Note: 2015 data.
A. Local Climate Finance Support
Flood control protection, national greening program,
electric vehicle project/renewable energy projects and
organic agriculture, among others
Vulnerability assessments, monitoring of vector-borne-
diseases, forecasting and early warning systems, risk
financing and institutional development
Pre-disaster preparedness programs (training, purchasing of
life-saving rescue equipment, supplies and medicines), post-
disaster activities and payment of premiums on calamity
insurance
Local Disaster Risk
Reduction and
Management
Fund
An Overview
Legal Basis & Policy Framework
• Created pursuant to Section 18 (Establishment of the People
Survival Fund) of the RA 10174
• A Special Fund with PHP 1 billion allocation from the General
Appropriation Act (GAA) to augment financial support for climate
change adaptation (CCA) programs, projects and activities (PAPs)
• May be augmented by donations, endowments, grants and
contributions
• Eligible beneficiaries are local government units and communities
including non-government organizations
Uses of the Fund
(a) sectoral vulnerability assessments;
(b) improvement of the monitoring of vector-borne
diseases;
(c) forecasting and early warning systems;
(d) institutional development for local governments
and communities;
(e) risk financing; and
(f) Community adaptation support programs
Status of PSF Implementation
• 38 proposals (8 or 21% electronic submissions)
• 24 proponents
- 19 LGUs (2 provinces, 16 municipalities, 1
city)
- 1 district representative
- 2 local community organizations
- 1 private citizen
• 9 potential candidates (41%) out of 22 complying
submissions, about PhP 452.4Million (cost of 8
projects only)
Note: Underline denotes provinces that qualified after pre-screening.
Way Forward
1. Review of eligible proposal for subsequent
endorsement to the PSF Board for funding;
2. Capacity building of communities and local
governments in the preparation of project
proposals; and
3. Mobilization of funds for PSF to ensure
availability of resources.
Note: Underline denotes provinces that qualified after pre-screening.
Potentials for LGUs
1. Mainstreaming CCA in priority sector(s);
climate-proofing
2. Identification of priorities
3. Incentive to plan and implement the Local
Climate Change Action Plan & Disaster Risk
Reduction & Management Plan
Note: Underline denotes provinces that qualified after pre-screening.
Thank you very much!
B. International Climate Finance Support
Adaptation and Mitigation projects
Adaptation and Mitigation projectsFast Start
Finance
Clean
Technology
Fund
Renewable energy, waste ,and
reforestation/afforestation projects
Clean
Development
Mechanism
Official
Development
Assistance
An extreme event:
Super typhoon Haiyan, Nov. 8, 2013
• Wind speed > 300 kph and storm surges of 4 m plus
• 2013 Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda) damage: 0.9% of GDP
• USD 9.6 B damage
• 0.9% of GDP
• Most affected: 16 million people in 14 provinces; 4 million (about
890 thousand families) displaced
• 6,293 reported casualties
• Affected 1.1 million houses, of which more than 550,000 houses
were totally destroyed
Source: Report.
• 2015 National budget: PHP 2,606 B.
• National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund
(NDRRMF): PHP 14 B (PHP 6.7 B is Quick Response Funds (QRF)
(Source: General Appropriations Act (GAA) 2015).
• Relevant budgets of government departments
• LDRRMF: no less than five percent (5%) of the estimated revenue
from regular sources ; 30% lump sum allocation for Quick
Response Fund (QRF)
• 2014-2016 Yolanda Comprehensive Rehabilitation and Recovery
Plan (CRRP), PHP 167.9 Billion (Typhoon Haiyan) - 6.4% of the
2015 national budget, 12 time bigger than the NDRRMF
II. Sources of Climate Finance Support
GoP
General
Appropriation Act: :
PHP 2,606 B
People Survival
Fund:
PHP 1B
NDRRM Fund:
PHP 14 B
International
Official Development
Assistance (ODA)
Multilateral and
Bilateral Loans or Grants
UNFCCC Mechanisms
1. Clean Development
Mechanism
2. Global Environmental Fund
3. Fast Start Finance
4. Adaptation Fund
5. Green Climate Fund
6. Clean Technology Fund
Note: 2015 data.
• Exposure to climate risks: LGUs in Category III
of the Updated PDP (2011-2016), enhanced
Provincial Development and Physical
Framework Plan (PDPFP) and CCA/DRR CLUP
• Poverty incidence
• Provinces with key biodiversity areas: DENR,
Priority Sites for Conservation in the
Philippines: Key Biodiversity Areas (2006).
Prioritization/Selection Criteria
Specific Evaluation
Guidelines/Consideration
• Level of risk and vulnerability to climate change
• Responsiveness/Consistency with development/sectoral plans
• Poverty reduction potential
• Cost effectiveness and attainability of the proposal
• Identification of potential co-benefits/Maximization of multi-sectoral or
cross-sectoral benefits
• Management of Environmental Risks/Impacts posed by the project (if
applicable)
• Sustainability plan/Potential for replication and/or upscaling of
program/project
• Presence of project monitoring and evaluation system
• Participation of affected communities in the design of the project
• Gender/PWD sensitivity
PSF Institutional Operations Chart
(CCO - Executive
Director)
PSF Institutional Structure
PSF Project
Proponents /
Recipients
(LGUs/ Local Organizations)
PSF Secretariat
PSF Board
PSF Technical
Evaluation
Committee
Assessment of
Proponent based on
Eligibility and on
Completeness of
Requirements
Technical
Evaluation based
on the set criteria
Board approval
(For Not Endorsed
Proposals)
Notice containing
Reasons sent back to
Proponents
Endorsement of the
PSF project proposals
for approval of the
Board
Climate Change
Commission
5 working days
15 working days
5 working days
5 working days
Climate Change
Office
Submission of Full-
Blown Proposals
Municipal
Development
Fund Office
Fund Disbursement
Project Implementation
3-5 working days
(upon completion and validation of
documents by MDFO)
Project Evaluation Process

People’s Survival Fund: Overview and Status

  • 1.
    1 People’s Survival Fund: Overviewand Status Antonio L. Fernandez Sr. Coordinator for the People’s Survival Fund Climate Change Commission/Office of the President Philippines National Adaptation Program (NAP) Global Network Targeted Topics Forum March 15-17, 2016, Kingston, Jamaica
  • 2.
    Outline I. Contextual background II.Sources of Climate Finance Support III. Details about the People’s Survival Fund A. Legal & Policy Framework B. Uses of the Fund C. Prioritization of Fund Allocation D. Institutional Structure E. Project Evaluation Process F. Evaluation Guidelines G. Status H. Fund Utilization IV. Way Forward
  • 3.
    I. Contextual background •Government system: Republic • Geographic location: Pacific typhoon belt, Pacific Rim of Fire, Coral Triangle • Extreme events e.g. typhoon Ondoy (2009) • Related laws: RA10121-National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010 NDRRMP; RA 9729-Climate Change Act of 2009 NCCCAP • Local autonomy of local government units (LGUs)
  • 4.
    Sources of CCA/DRRfunds GoP Government Appropriations Act: PHP 2,606 B Regular department budgets NDRRM Fund: PHP 14 B (30% for QRF) People’s Survival Fund (PHP 1B) Internal Revenue Allotment (10%) for Local Government Units Local Disaster Risk Reduction & Management Fund (30% for QRF) Note: 2015 data.
  • 5.
    A. Local ClimateFinance Support Flood control protection, national greening program, electric vehicle project/renewable energy projects and organic agriculture, among others Vulnerability assessments, monitoring of vector-borne- diseases, forecasting and early warning systems, risk financing and institutional development Pre-disaster preparedness programs (training, purchasing of life-saving rescue equipment, supplies and medicines), post- disaster activities and payment of premiums on calamity insurance Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Legal Basis &Policy Framework • Created pursuant to Section 18 (Establishment of the People Survival Fund) of the RA 10174 • A Special Fund with PHP 1 billion allocation from the General Appropriation Act (GAA) to augment financial support for climate change adaptation (CCA) programs, projects and activities (PAPs) • May be augmented by donations, endowments, grants and contributions • Eligible beneficiaries are local government units and communities including non-government organizations
  • 8.
    Uses of theFund (a) sectoral vulnerability assessments; (b) improvement of the monitoring of vector-borne diseases; (c) forecasting and early warning systems; (d) institutional development for local governments and communities; (e) risk financing; and (f) Community adaptation support programs
  • 9.
    Status of PSFImplementation • 38 proposals (8 or 21% electronic submissions) • 24 proponents - 19 LGUs (2 provinces, 16 municipalities, 1 city) - 1 district representative - 2 local community organizations - 1 private citizen • 9 potential candidates (41%) out of 22 complying submissions, about PhP 452.4Million (cost of 8 projects only)
  • 10.
    Note: Underline denotesprovinces that qualified after pre-screening. Way Forward 1. Review of eligible proposal for subsequent endorsement to the PSF Board for funding; 2. Capacity building of communities and local governments in the preparation of project proposals; and 3. Mobilization of funds for PSF to ensure availability of resources.
  • 11.
    Note: Underline denotesprovinces that qualified after pre-screening. Potentials for LGUs 1. Mainstreaming CCA in priority sector(s); climate-proofing 2. Identification of priorities 3. Incentive to plan and implement the Local Climate Change Action Plan & Disaster Risk Reduction & Management Plan
  • 12.
    Note: Underline denotesprovinces that qualified after pre-screening. Thank you very much!
  • 13.
    B. International ClimateFinance Support Adaptation and Mitigation projects Adaptation and Mitigation projectsFast Start Finance Clean Technology Fund Renewable energy, waste ,and reforestation/afforestation projects Clean Development Mechanism Official Development Assistance
  • 14.
    An extreme event: Supertyphoon Haiyan, Nov. 8, 2013 • Wind speed > 300 kph and storm surges of 4 m plus • 2013 Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda) damage: 0.9% of GDP • USD 9.6 B damage • 0.9% of GDP • Most affected: 16 million people in 14 provinces; 4 million (about 890 thousand families) displaced • 6,293 reported casualties • Affected 1.1 million houses, of which more than 550,000 houses were totally destroyed Source: Report.
  • 16.
    • 2015 Nationalbudget: PHP 2,606 B. • National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund (NDRRMF): PHP 14 B (PHP 6.7 B is Quick Response Funds (QRF) (Source: General Appropriations Act (GAA) 2015). • Relevant budgets of government departments • LDRRMF: no less than five percent (5%) of the estimated revenue from regular sources ; 30% lump sum allocation for Quick Response Fund (QRF) • 2014-2016 Yolanda Comprehensive Rehabilitation and Recovery Plan (CRRP), PHP 167.9 Billion (Typhoon Haiyan) - 6.4% of the 2015 national budget, 12 time bigger than the NDRRMF
  • 17.
    II. Sources ofClimate Finance Support GoP General Appropriation Act: : PHP 2,606 B People Survival Fund: PHP 1B NDRRM Fund: PHP 14 B International Official Development Assistance (ODA) Multilateral and Bilateral Loans or Grants UNFCCC Mechanisms 1. Clean Development Mechanism 2. Global Environmental Fund 3. Fast Start Finance 4. Adaptation Fund 5. Green Climate Fund 6. Clean Technology Fund Note: 2015 data.
  • 18.
    • Exposure toclimate risks: LGUs in Category III of the Updated PDP (2011-2016), enhanced Provincial Development and Physical Framework Plan (PDPFP) and CCA/DRR CLUP • Poverty incidence • Provinces with key biodiversity areas: DENR, Priority Sites for Conservation in the Philippines: Key Biodiversity Areas (2006). Prioritization/Selection Criteria
  • 19.
    Specific Evaluation Guidelines/Consideration • Levelof risk and vulnerability to climate change • Responsiveness/Consistency with development/sectoral plans • Poverty reduction potential • Cost effectiveness and attainability of the proposal • Identification of potential co-benefits/Maximization of multi-sectoral or cross-sectoral benefits • Management of Environmental Risks/Impacts posed by the project (if applicable) • Sustainability plan/Potential for replication and/or upscaling of program/project • Presence of project monitoring and evaluation system • Participation of affected communities in the design of the project • Gender/PWD sensitivity
  • 20.
    PSF Institutional OperationsChart (CCO - Executive Director) PSF Institutional Structure
  • 21.
    PSF Project Proponents / Recipients (LGUs/Local Organizations) PSF Secretariat PSF Board PSF Technical Evaluation Committee Assessment of Proponent based on Eligibility and on Completeness of Requirements Technical Evaluation based on the set criteria Board approval (For Not Endorsed Proposals) Notice containing Reasons sent back to Proponents Endorsement of the PSF project proposals for approval of the Board Climate Change Commission 5 working days 15 working days 5 working days 5 working days Climate Change Office Submission of Full- Blown Proposals Municipal Development Fund Office Fund Disbursement Project Implementation 3-5 working days (upon completion and validation of documents by MDFO) Project Evaluation Process