Embed presentation
Download to read offline


![Ethical dilemmas
PEG tubes are often used inappropriately because of
unrealistic and inaccurate expectations of what they can
achieve.[11] Feeding tubes have been too often inserted in
patients who will not benefit from them and whose quality
of life in a terminal stage of illness will be adversely
affected. Multidisciplinary care and educational programmes
have been found to reduce the numbers of patients receiving
feeding tubes inappropriately.[12]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/chapter5-160510183422/85/Peg-Feeding-3-320.jpg)
![Ethical dilemmas
PEG insertion should not be performed for adults for
administrative convenience or to save money, time or human
resources unless there will be an improvement in the quality
of life rather than just maintaining life. However, when used
for the care of children, it may be agreed to insert PEG
tubes to save time for the caregivers and improve the
quality of life for the family as a whole, despite knowing
that the underlying disorder (eg, severe cerebral palsy) will
not improve.[1]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/chapter5-160510183422/85/Peg-Feeding-4-320.jpg)

Feeding tubes are often inappropriately inserted in patients with dementia contrary to their and their families' wishes. Research shows little benefit from aggressive nutritional support via feeding tubes for those with dementia as it does not improve life expectancy, weight, or reduce complications. Feeding tubes should not be used for administrative convenience and have been found to adversely affect quality of life in terminal patients. Hospitals are now reviewing PEG requests with nutrition teams and consultants to appropriately assess if insertion will improve quality of life rather than just prolonging it.


![Ethical dilemmas
PEG tubes are often used inappropriately because of
unrealistic and inaccurate expectations of what they can
achieve.[11] Feeding tubes have been too often inserted in
patients who will not benefit from them and whose quality
of life in a terminal stage of illness will be adversely
affected. Multidisciplinary care and educational programmes
have been found to reduce the numbers of patients receiving
feeding tubes inappropriately.[12]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/chapter5-160510183422/85/Peg-Feeding-3-320.jpg)
![Ethical dilemmas
PEG insertion should not be performed for adults for
administrative convenience or to save money, time or human
resources unless there will be an improvement in the quality
of life rather than just maintaining life. However, when used
for the care of children, it may be agreed to insert PEG
tubes to save time for the caregivers and improve the
quality of life for the family as a whole, despite knowing
that the underlying disorder (eg, severe cerebral palsy) will
not improve.[1]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/chapter5-160510183422/85/Peg-Feeding-4-320.jpg)
