Peer responses to two classmates' posts are due in 16 hours. The guided response asks peers to discuss any competing loyalties, values, or systems that present challenges to ethical decision making at personal, professional, or societal levels for their classmates. It also asks about consequences of options considered. Lashanta's post discusses ethical considerations in program planning, including research inclusivity, confidentiality, anonymity, informed consent, and implications of privacy infringements. Gloria's post discusses ensuring participants are not subject to unfair judgment and developing a justified methodology that interprets data for her final research project on juvenile justice punishments. Both discuss how ethical violations can damage research accuracy, effectiveness, and goals.