Slides from my talk in the European Citizen Science Conference in Berlin, May 2016. The talk look at issues of participation, citizen science and open science, and a bit about implications. It's about participation inequality and educational attainment of participants
What is Extreme Citizen Science? Volunteerism & Publicly Initiated Scientific...Cindy Regalado
This presentation briefly illustrates the state of citizen science our approach in Extreme Citizen Science. We present two examples under this research group at University College London: Publicly Initiated Scientific Research and the Socio-demographics of Volunteerism
Open Science and Citizen Science - researcher, participants, and institutiona...Muki Haklay
Presentation from the OECD workshop on 9th April 2018, GSF-NESTI Workshop on "Reconciling Scientific Excellence and Open Science" asked the question "What do we want out of science and how can we incentivise and monitor these outputs?". The talk covers the personal experience as a researcher, the experience of participants in citizen science projects, and the institutional aspects.
What is Extreme Citizen Science? Volunteerism & Publicly Initiated Scientific...Cindy Regalado
This presentation briefly illustrates the state of citizen science our approach in Extreme Citizen Science. We present two examples under this research group at University College London: Publicly Initiated Scientific Research and the Socio-demographics of Volunteerism
Open Science and Citizen Science - researcher, participants, and institutiona...Muki Haklay
Presentation from the OECD workshop on 9th April 2018, GSF-NESTI Workshop on "Reconciling Scientific Excellence and Open Science" asked the question "What do we want out of science and how can we incentivise and monitor these outputs?". The talk covers the personal experience as a researcher, the experience of participants in citizen science projects, and the institutional aspects.
The power of cs in education moraitopoulou elina republica 2017Elina MORAITOPOULOU
Rapidly advancing scientific research is among the main transforming actors of our societies today. Citizen Science can promote public awareness, encourage meaningful contribution to research projects and empower local and global communities. How can we rethink school education through the prism of Citizen Science? And how can we start from schools to re-establish the links between scientific research and society, while promoting awareness and collaboration?
link to oral presentation >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aN2Y-o3uM-c&t=264s
What happens when instead of asking the crowd for help, the question of what is explored is handed over to the participants?
The potential of bottom-up citizen science has increased dramatically in the past decade. To understand this, we can look at the societal and technological changes that led to this proliferation, and then explore the challenges, risks and opportunities that this approach presents.
This seminar will also be live webcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqY8Jv5r4bs
Into the Night - Citizen Science Training day - introduction to citizen scienceMuki Haklay
Setting, running and evaluating - In this session, we will provide a brief overview of the types of citizen science that are relevant in addressing environmental challenges. We will look at classifications of citizen science projects, explore their potential goals, the process of recruitment and retention as well as the need to start project evaluation from an early stage. Participants will have the opportunity to engage in a short exercise to consider how these elements can be used in the design of a citizen science project.
The role of learning in citizen scienceMuki Haklay
This is a presentation from the citizen science impact event at the Open University http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/opentel/citizen-science-impact-event-at-the-open-university/
Citizen science offer different levels of engagement to participants, which have been captured in typologies of the field (contributory, collaborative, co-created, collegial / crowdsourcing, distributed intelligence, participatory science, extreme citizen science). These typologies do no explicitly examine learning. At the same time, projects and activities striving to fulfil multiple goals (excellent scientific output, satisfying engagement, good recruitment, learning …). Within ythe range of citizen science project, we can consider different aspects of learning that are occurring in them, Projects and use examples from a range of project, and raise some aspects that can help those who are designing co-created projects.
The role of learning in community science and citizen scienceMuki Haklay
This are slides from the talk on 12 Oct, Joint workshop of the Teaching and Learning and Citizen Science Special Interest Groups of the British Ecological Society, which was held on 12th October 2018 at the University of Reading. The talk explores links between learning and citizen science - contributory and collegial in particular. This is an improved version of the Citizen Inquiry slides
Citizen Science & Geographical Technologies: creativity, learning, and engage...Muki Haklay
These slides are from a keynote talk at the Esri Education User Conference in 2016, about citizen science and extreme citizen science, and their link to geographical technologies
Presentation from Working with arts festivals at the 2013 Science Communication Conference organised by the British Science Association - slides by Helen Roy
Overview of Citizen Science - Zurich November 2015Muki Haklay
A presentation that provides an overview of the societal & technical trends that are at the basis of citizen science (as in previous talks), then a classification of the main types of citizen science and finally a short overview of policy trends.
Citizen Science in Open Science context: measuring & understanding impacts of...Muki Haklay
Within the emerging European agenda for open science, deeper public engagement with science, through citizen science, is now part and parcel of Horizon Europe. Yet, there are many issues that need to be understood – the uneven landscape of citizen science across the European Research Area, scientific disciplines, and institutions; the balancing of multiple goals that citizen science projects enact between raising awareness to scientific issues to producing data and analysis that can lead to top discoveries; measuring and assessing the outcomes and outputs of projects; and consideration about the data, analysis, and outputs. The talk will provide a short introduction to citizen science and modes of engagement in it, introduce the “Doing It Together Science” (DITOs) escalator model; and review some of the emerging policy responses to citizen science across the world.
#FuturePub - Citizen Science, Open Science & scientific publicationsMuki Haklay
Slides from a short talk at the #FuturePub 7 event, London, 10 May 2016. Covering a bit of background of citizen science, explaining the link to open science, and issues of scientific publishing that emerge from these interactions
citizen science - a brief introduction Muki Haklay
Presentation by Muki Haklay in a participatory virtual workshop June 2020. The presentation provided an overview of the types of activities that fall under the umbrella term citizen science - from activities that people do at home using the computers and the internet (volunteer computing or volunteer thinking) to ecological monitoring of landscape change in an opportunistic way. The presentation also pointed out to the multiple goals of citizen science projects - from engaging people in environmental issues, to providing opportunities to disadvantaged groups in society. The level of participation across projects was also highlighted, indicating that as requirements and knowledge increase, the number of people that are currently engaged in citizen science project decreases.
Haw GIScience lost its interdisciplinary mojo?Muki Haklay
These are the slides from my talk at the GISCience 2016 conference. There is more information on my blog, but the abstract is:
Over the past 25 years, I have experienced an inside track view of two interdisciplinary research fields: Geographical Information Science (GIScience) and Citizen Science. Over that period, I was also involved in about 20 multidisciplinary, cross-disciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary projects. As a result, I also found myself evaluating and funding x-disciplinary projects.
On the basis of these experiences, I’d argue that Interdisciplinarity is always hard, risky, require compromises, accommodations, listening, and making mistakes. The excitement from the outputs and outcomes does not always justify the price. Frequently, there is no-follow on project – it’s been too exhausting.
Considering the project level challenges, viewing interdisciplinary areas of studies emerging is especially interesting. You can notice how concepts are being argued and agreed on. You can see what is inside and what is outside, and where the boundary is drawn. You can see how methodologies, jargon, acceptable behaviour, and modes of operations get accepted or rejected – and from the inside, you can nudge the field and sometimes see the impact of your actions.
GIScience was born as an interdisciplinary field of study, and the period of consolidation that I have seen was supposed to lead to stability and growth. This did not happen. Take any measure that you like: size of conferences, papers – or even the argument if the field deserve a Wikipedia page. Something didn’t work.
In contrast, Citizen Science is already attracting to its conferences audience in the many hundreds – the Citizen Science Association include 4000 (free) members, The European Citizen Science Association 180 (paid) – and that is in the first 2 years since they’ve established.
In the talk, I explore the way in which interdisciplinary projects and fields work, highlight the similarities and differences, and suggest the issues that have led to the outcomes that we see today
Democratic innovation? Diversifying museum audiences through participatory di...Museums Computer Group
Jennifer Wexler – Digital Research Project Producer (British Museum), Daniel Pett - Fitzwilliam Museum, and Chiara Bonacchi – Lecturer in Heritage (University of Stirling)
This session will look at how we can use digital technology to democratise access to archaeological and museum collections, as well as increase public awareness and knowledge of these collections using innovative tools such as 3D modelling and AR/VR experiences.
Devising a citizen science monitoring programme for tree regeneration the upl...Muki Haklay
Presentation by Chris Andrews from a participatory virtual workshop June 2020 on citizen science in the Cairngorms national park. Aims of presentation: To provide a background information as to what's going on ecologically in the uplands; To explore why some upland habitats might be changing; Example of what could be done through a case study at the ECN Cairngorm long-term monitoring site; Provide a framework in which to think about what variables might be useful to citizen science project on monitoring regeneration.
The value of citizen science for environmental monitoring in ScotlandMuki Haklay
Presentation by Nadia Dewhurst Richman from a participatory virtual workshop in June 2020. This presentation gives an overview of the benefits of citizen science using examples of existing projects in Scotland, along with an introduction to Scotland’s Environment Web.
Citizen Science as a tool to support land management in the Cairngorms Nation...Muki Haklay
Presentation by Jan Dick from the participatory virtual workshop in June 2020. Part of UKRI project to explore the suitability of citizen science for Long-Term Scoio-Ecological Research (LTSER)
Slides from Susanne Hecker and Muki Haklay talk in an ECSA webinar about the ECSA Characteristics of Citizen science https://zenodo.org/communities/citscicharacteristics/ - covering the methodology and the main features of the document. The webinar is available here https://zenodo.org/record/3859970
Extreme Citizen Science technologies: attempting to embed values in codeMuki Haklay
Extreme Citizen Science (ExCiteS) is a situated, bottom-up practice that takes into account local needs, practices and culture and works with broad networks of people to design and build new devices and knowledge creation processes that can transform the world. The ExCiteS group at UCL was set up to support the implementation of this concept through the development of theories, methodologies, processes, and technologies that allow any community, regardless of (technical) literacy, to engage in citizen science projects that produce results that are meaningful and useful for them. Stemming from theoretical foundations in participatory action research and public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS), our technologies are designed to carry values with them. Once we visit these values, we can see how they turn into code, and ask how successful these efforts are, using cases in the Amazon, Congo-basin, Namibia, UK, and Malta.
The persistent environmental digital divide(s) -RGS-IBG 2018Muki Haklay
Over 25 years ago, as the web was emerging as a medium for distributing public information, it was promoted as a tool for increased democratisation. From the age of dial-up modem and PCs to the use of mobile phones and smartphones, concerns about digital divides and how they impact the ability of local participation in environmental decision making never resolved. These digital divides are creating a tapestry of marginalisation through different devices, skills, and communication potentials, and it is valuable to reflect on their dimensions – both technical and social, and consider how we can consider them in a systematic way. The talk will attempt to reflect on technological and social changes and the attempts to address them.
Pecha Kucha session: multi country science programs Ecsite 2018Muki Haklay
Doing It Together Science (DITOs) is a 3-year project, funded by the EU Horizon 2020 programme, that is aimed to increase awareness of and participation in citizen science across Europe and beyond. It is focused on communication, coordination, and support of citizen science activities. Therefore, the project promotes the sharing of best practices among existing networks for a greater public and policy engagement with citizen science through a wide range of events and activities.
Introduction to Citizen Science and Scientific Crowdsourcing - Data Quality s...Muki Haklay
This is part of the course "introduction to citizen science and scientific crowdsourcing", which you can find at https://extendstore.ucl.ac.uk/product?catalog=UCLXICSSCJan17 . The lecture is dedicated to data management in citizen science, and this part is focusing on data quality
The Willing Volunteer – Incorporating Voluntary Data into National DatabasesMuki Haklay
At present few mapping databases contain crowd sourced or voluntary data. Consider how, in the future, this will be a valuable source of data for national geospatial, cadastral and mapping agencies
Examining the values that are embedded in the processes and technologies of p...Muki Haklay
A persistent question about participatory methodologies that rely on technologies, such as public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS), is how to integrate values, such as inclusiveness of all the people that are impacted by a decision, or identifying options that are popular by the majority but acceptable to the minority, within technologically focused projects. Moreover, technologies do not operate by themselves – they are embedded in organizational, political, and social processes that set how they are used, who can use them, and in what context. Therefore, we should explore where the values reside?
Two factors obscure our view: The misleading conceptualisation that technologies are value free, and can be used for good or for bad – which put all the weight on the process, and ignores the way in which any technology allow only certain actions to be taken. Another popular view of technology conceptualisation is to emphasise their advantages (upside) and ignore their limitations. If we move beyond these, and other “common sense” views of technologies, we can notice how process and technology intertwine.
We can therefore look at the way the process/technology reinforce and limit each other, and the way that the values are integrated and influence them. With this analysis, we can also consider how technological development can explicitly include considerations of values, and be philosophically, politically, and social-theory informed. We need to consider the roles, skills, and knowledge of the people that are involved in each part of the process – from community facilitation to software development.
The paper will draw on the experience of developing participatory geographic information technologies over the past 20 years, and will suggest future directions for values-based participatory technology development.
Into the Night - Technology for citizen scienceMuki Haklay
Current citizen science seems effortless...just download an app and start using it. However, there are many technical aspects that are necessary to make a citizen science project work. In this session, we will provide an overview of all the technical elements that are required - from the process of designing an app., to designing and managing a back-end system, to testing the system end to end before deployment. Participants will have the opportunity to engage in a short exercise to consider the design of an app for a citizen science project that addresses light pollution.
Algorithmic governance in environmental information (or how technophilia shap...Muki Haklay
Presentation from a workshop in Galway, March 2016. Showing the history of linkage between environmental decision making and information systems, and the opportunities and challenges that this creates. Also the problem in terms of public access and use of information
Citizen science - theory, practice & policy workshopMuki Haklay
These slides are from a 3.5h workshop, as part of the Israeli Geographical Association, Jerusalem, 14 Dec 2015. The workshop provided knowledge of the field of citizen science and current trends that influence it; Helped participants to understand the principles and practical aspects of designing a citizen science project; Included a session with hands-on experience of citizen science activity; Learn about additional resources that can be used to design and run citizen science projects; Understand the policy trends that are influencing the field.
Many of the slides are from previous talks with organisation and ordered in a way that they are suitable for the workshop
Extreme Citizen Science: Current Development Muki Haklay
Slides from a talk to UCL Institute of Global Prosperity soundbites event - 5th November 2015.
With a growing emphasis on civil society-led change in diverse disciplines, from International Development to Town Planning, there is an increasing demand to understand how institutions might work with the public effectively and fairly.
Extreme Citizen Science is a situated, bottom-up practice that takes into account local needs, practices and culture and works with broad networks of people to design and build new devices and knowledge creation processes that can transform the world.
In this talk, Muki will discuss the work of UCL Extreme Citizen Science group within the wider context of the developments in the field of citizen science.He will cover the work that ExCiteS has already done, currently developing and plans for the future.
https://www.igp.ucl.ac.uk/igp-events-pub/muki-haklay-extreme-citizen-science
Eye on Earth Summit - Data Revolution plenary Muki Haklay
The presentation explores the place for extreme citizen science within the landscape of citizen science in general. The first half looks at the history of citizen science and highlights the education transition that happened while citizen science evolved , while the second half explains what is extreme citizen science and the roles of the technological tools that have been developed within the ExCiteS group, with an open invitation for others to join the effort.
Building centre event "mapping for making" Muki Haklay
Description of current activities of Mapping for Change, and the new community mapping system, as well as other technologies are being used in community mapping and citizen science.
Paper from the Programmable City workshop data and the city. See more details on my blog at http://wp.me/p7DNf-sX for description of the workshop. The paper explores the link between citizen science and philosophy of technology
Slide 1: Title Slide
Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Slide 2: Introduction to Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Definition: Extrachromosomal inheritance refers to the transmission of genetic material that is not found within the nucleus.
Key Components: Involves genes located in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and plasmids.
Slide 3: Mitochondrial Inheritance
Mitochondria: Organelles responsible for energy production.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in mitochondria.
Inheritance Pattern: Maternally inherited, meaning it is passed from mothers to all their offspring.
Diseases: Examples include Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and mitochondrial myopathy.
Slide 4: Chloroplast Inheritance
Chloroplasts: Organelles responsible for photosynthesis in plants.
Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in chloroplasts.
Inheritance Pattern: Often maternally inherited in most plants, but can vary in some species.
Examples: Variegation in plants, where leaf color patterns are determined by chloroplast DNA.
Slide 5: Plasmid Inheritance
Plasmids: Small, circular DNA molecules found in bacteria and some eukaryotes.
Features: Can carry antibiotic resistance genes and can be transferred between cells through processes like conjugation.
Significance: Important in biotechnology for gene cloning and genetic engineering.
Slide 6: Mechanisms of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Non-Mendelian Patterns: Do not follow Mendel’s laws of inheritance.
Cytoplasmic Segregation: During cell division, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are randomly distributed to daughter cells.
Heteroplasmy: Presence of more than one type of organellar genome within a cell, leading to variation in expression.
Slide 7: Examples of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Four O’clock Plant (Mirabilis jalapa): Shows variegated leaves due to different cpDNA in leaf cells.
Petite Mutants in Yeast: Result from mutations in mitochondrial DNA affecting respiration.
Slide 8: Importance of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Evolution: Provides insight into the evolution of eukaryotic cells.
Medicine: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance helps in diagnosing and treating mitochondrial diseases.
Agriculture: Chloroplast inheritance can be used in plant breeding and genetic modification.
Slide 9: Recent Research and Advances
Gene Editing: Techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 are being used to edit mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.
Therapies: Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) for preventing mitochondrial diseases.
Slide 10: Conclusion
Summary: Extrachromosomal inheritance involves the transmission of genetic material outside the nucleus and plays a crucial role in genetics, medicine, and biotechnology.
Future Directions: Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for new treatments and applications.
Slide 11: Questions and Discussion
Invite Audience: Open the floor for any questions or further discussion on the topic.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
A brief information about the SCOP protein database used in bioinformatics.
The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database is a comprehensive and authoritative resource for the structural and evolutionary relationships of proteins. It provides a detailed and curated classification of protein structures, grouping them into families, superfamilies, and folds based on their structural and sequence similarities.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
2. Acknowledgement
This talk would not be possible without the
generosity of the many people and
communities that we have worked with
over the years…
3. Acknowledgement
… and the funders and project partners that we’ve
worked with (and will work with in the future)
4. Outline
• What do we mean by participation?
• A closer look at demographics and
participation inequality in citizen science
• Outcomes: different modes of
participations, implications to open
science agenda
5. A Ladder of Citizen Participation
• In 1969, based on her
experience at the US
department for Housing,
Education and Welfare (HUD),
Sherry Rubin Arnstein
developed a typology of
citizen participation –
Arnstein’s ladder
Arnstein, S.R., 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of
planners, 35(4), pp.216-224.
6. Participation Ladders
Public Right to Object
Restricted Participation
Public Right to Know
Informing the Public
PP in the final decision
Public Participation (PP) in
defining interests, actors and agenda
PP in assessing Risks and
Recommending Solutions
Wiedemann, P.M. and Femers, S., 1993. Public participation in waste management decision
making: Analysis and management of conflicts. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 33(3), pp.355-368.
8. Participation in Citizen Science
Level 4 ‘Extreme’
• Participatory Science – problem definition,
data collection and analysis
Level 3 ‘Participatory science’
• Participation in problem definition
and data collection
Level 2 ‘Distributed Intelligence’
• Citizens as basic interpreters
Level 1 ‘Crowdsourcing’
• Citizens as sensors
Haklay, M., 2013. Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and
typology of participation. In Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge (pp. 105-122).
9. Level 4 ‘Extreme’
• Participatory Science – problem definition,
data collection and analysis
Level 3 ‘Participatory science’
• Participation in problem definition
and data collection
Level 2 ‘Distributed Intelligence’
• Citizens as basic interpreters
Level 1 ‘Crowdsourcing’
• Citizens as sensors
Participation in Citizen Science
Source: BioScience 58(3) p.
192
10. Hanny van Arkel. “The Dutch schoolteacher and Queen
admirer who discovered Hanny’s Voorwerp”.
Not so simple!
• Projects at the ‘bottom’
demonstrate deep
engagement:
– Hanny van Arkel,
– Green Peas,
– Teams in volunteer
computing projects…
• Two characteristics, in
particular:
– Educational attainment
– Participation
11. Educational attainment
• Among the general
population of EU 28, the
education attainment is
27% tertiary education
(university).
• Variability: UK 37.6%,
France 30.4%, Germany
23.8%, Italy 15.5%,
Romania 15%
27%
46%
27%
Education Attainment EU 28 (2015)
Up to Lower Secondary
Upper secondary
Tertiary education
14. OpenStreetMap (2010)
High School
or lower
(5%)
Some
College
(17%)
Undergraduate
(49%)
Masters
(21%)
Doctoral
(8%)
Budhathoki, N.R. and Haythornthwaite, C., 2013. Motivation for open collaboration crowd
and community models and the case of OpenStreetMap. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5),
pp.548-575.
15. Galaxy Zoo (2013)
High School
or unknown
35%
Undergraduate
33%
Masters
22%
Doctoral
10%
Raddick, M.J., Bracey, G., Gay, P.L., Lintott, C.J., Cardamone, C., Murray, P., Schawinski, K.,
Szalay, A.S. and Vandenberg, J., 2013. Galaxy Zoo: Motivations of citizen scientists. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1303.6886.
16. Transcribe Bentham (2012)
High School or
unknown
3%
Undergraduate
34%
Masters
39%
Doctoral
24%
Causer, T, and Wallace, V., 2012. Building a volunteer community: results and findings from
Transcribe Bentham. Digital Humanities Quarterly , 6
19. iSpot – observers & id’ers
• iSpot provide two demonstration: in the effort of
observations, and in the identification (c. 200,000
participants)
Silvertown, J., Harvey, M., Greenwood, R., Dodd, M., Rosewell, J., Rebelo, T., Ansine, J. and
McConway, K., 2015. Crowdsourcing the identification of organisms: A case-study of
iSpot. ZooKeys, (480), p.125.
22. High engagement Low engagement
High
Skills
• Highly valuable effort:
research assistants
• Significant time
investment
• Opportunities for deeper
engagement (writing
papers, analysis)
• Skills might contribute to data
quality
• Possible use of disciplinary
jargon
• Opportunities for lighter or
deeper engagement to match
time/effort constraints
Low
Skills
• Providing an opportunity
for education, awareness
raising, increased science
capital, other skills
• Require support and
facilitation
• Opportunity for active
engagement with science with
limited effort
• Family/cross-generational
potential
• Outreach to marginalised
groups (OPen Air Laboratories)
24. Complex participation
• Not ‘more control = good / less control = bad’
• Participation of the privileged (scientific
0.1%?) for the common good: public scientific
knowledge
• Outreach and engagement with marginalised
groups provide skills, opportunities, science
capital
• Variable depth of participation address
lifestyles, care responsibilities, constraints
25. Complex participation
• Participation ∩ Education attainment =
range of skills and levels of engagement.
We know that the relationships are not
simple
• From ‘one time’ to ‘dedicated expert’,
with different formal titles, authority,
knowledge and patterns of activity
26. Risks to participation
Exceptions:
• Level of control by
project owners
• Purpose of the
project
• Duty of care for
participants
• Can be exploitative
27. Arnstein & Citizen Science
• Citizen control, a-la Arnstein is needed in
some cases: Civic Science
• Knowingly delegating power to scientists
can be a preferred option
• Partnership and
co-creation, even
informing (‘I’m glad
someone is doing it’) are
valuable
30. Participatory Citizen Science
• How can we find routes
to make citizen science
participatory across the
range activities?
• What is the engine for
the escalator? Is there
an engine?
• Do we want ‘nudges’?
Behaviour change?
• What are the social and
individual costs of
change? Who pays?
32. Citizen Science & Open Science
• Participants are well educated & contribution to
science is known to be a core motivator
• They Provide free labour and/or resources, and
many want to see outputs used openly
• Have the right to read about the research they’ve
done
• Open access publications are necessary to keep
motivation & feedback
• Participants can also analyse the data and might
have their own analysis, visualisations and
conclusions. Open source tools make this
possible.
33. Citizen Science & Scientific
Publication
• Strong support
for Open
Access
• Creative
solutions to
open access to
data &
publications
emerge
34. Conclusions
• Citizen science & participation – complex
story!
• Understanding the interplay of
participation inequality, educational
attainment, gender, class, professional
knowledge, and other elements is
necessary
• Participation help in clarifying the link to
open science