Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to OpenEd2016: Student perceptions - Open Textbook
Similar to OpenEd2016: Student perceptions - Open Textbook (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
OpenEd2016: Student perceptions - Open Textbook
- 1. Open Textbook Student Usability Research Results #OpenEd16Justin Whiting Indiana University @jnwhiting juswhiti@indiana.edu Barbara Illowsky, PhD Foothill-De Anza Community College District @DrBSI illowskybarbara@fhda.edu John Hilton III, PhD Brigham Young University @johnhiltoniii johnhiltoniii@byu.edu
- 2. This study examined the perceptions that students have of different versions of an open statistics textbook used over several years in one community college. Survey results show that students generally had at least as good of an experience using the open textbook compared to traditional textbooks.
- 3. Background Study 1 – Collaborative Statistics – Introductory statistics open textbook produced by Connexions – Black & White Only – Could be viewed online (free) or printed ($30) Study 2 – Introductory Statistics – Introductory statistics open textbook produced by OpenStax College – Updated color and formatting – Upgraded graphs and images – More community developed with faculty narratives, feedback, and examples – Could be viewed online, via an app, in iBooks, or printed
- 4. Methods • Two versions (Collaborative Statistics & Introductory Statistics) of an open statistics textbook • Questionnaire data* collected during 7 terms (2013-2015) • Use of descriptive statistics to analyze the quantitative data • Emergent coding to identify themes from the qualitative questions *based in part on a survey utilized by Bliss, Hilton III, Wiley, & Thanos (2013)
- 5. Collaborative Statistics Questionnaire sent to all De Anza College students using the textbook during Spring and Fall terms in 2013. – N = 231 responses from 17 classes – 54% female, 46% male – 9% receive loans for education – 37% receive Pell Grants or fee waivers
- 6. Collaborative Statistics Student Perception of Cost •48% of the students purchased the text (under $30) •61% reported printing some of the materials •84 % of students that didn’t purchase textbook, reasoned, “the text was available free of charge online.” It appears most students experienced significant savings compared to traditional textbook
- 7. Collaborative Statistics Student Perception of Quality •Students reported they used this text about as much as they would any other textbook (65% said twice a week or more) •When asked to rate quality of this text compared to other textbooks: – 25% better – 62% same – 13% worse
- 8. What made Collaborative Statistics better or worse?
- 9. Overall, what did you think of the text used in this course?
- 10. Coding scheme examples Positive general: – “I think it was a good choice for this course. It had a good variety of homework problems and labs that appeal to most of the students.” Positive clarity: – “I appreciated it because the objectives were clear and the examples followed the objectives.”
- 11. Coding scheme examples Negative relevance: – “It needs improvement as our instructor substituted material for chapters that were not very comprehensive.” – “It was a good text but not good enough to rely on for the sole purpose of learning, I prefer teacher notes since it simplifies everything for me.”
- 12. What made it better? & What made it worse?
- 13. What made it better? Online – “Free…I have attended other institutions and this course is the first one that offered a free textbook. I am very appreciative both of the access to knowledge in a form that is digital, online and hard copy. Also, cost is prohibitive for textbooks sometimes, and not having to pay for textbooks is a direction I'd like to see education move towards.” Price – “It is free and it is just like regular textbooks.”
- 14. Introductory Statistics (new version) Questionnaire sent to all students using the textbook during Spring semester in 2015 – N = 94 responses from 9 classes (however, the majority came from a single class) – 54% male, 46% female – 13% received loans for education – 41% received Pell grants or fee waivers
- 15. Introductory Statistics Student Perception of Cost •70% of students did not purchase textbook •53% of students did print materials – spent less than $20.00 on printing •70 % of students that didn’t purchase textbook, reasoned, “the text was available free of charge online.” •Access – 47% used the book online – 23% downloaded a PDF – 31% used a hard copy It appears most students experienced significant savings compared to traditional textbook
- 16. Introductory Statistics Student perception of Quality •When asked to rate quality of this text compared to other textbooks: – 23% better – 70% same – 7% worse
- 17. Overall, what did you think of the text used in this course?
- 18. Discussion Student Perception of Cost Compared
- 19. Discussion • Overall, student responses to using both Collaborative Statistics and the updated Introductory Statistics were positive. • For both open textbooks, students overwhelmingly reported the text was the same as, or better than their traditional texts. • In response to open-ended questions, both groups of students provided similar comments.
- 20. Limitations • While the authors attempted to distinguish between use of a hard copy textbook and use of an open, online textbook in their research, some students chose to purchase the hard copy of the text, and thus may have given responses that were based on the hard copy version of the open textbook. • Limited sample of one college population
- 21. Future Research • Future research might focus on cost trade- offs of open versus expensive textbooks, as well as low cost (under $40) versus traditionally priced, expensive textbooks. • An expanded survey population of multiple institutions and instructors in order to more adequately generalize the findings of the study.
- 22. Conclusion • Students perceive the quality of the open textbook to be as good or better than more expensive commercial textbooks • When it comes to textbook costs, students might not, “get what they pay for.” • Professors and educational administrators should carefully consider adopting open textbooks to reduce the high cost of traditional texts.
- 23. Full article: Open Praxis, Volume 8, No 3 (2016) http://www.openpraxis.org/index.php/OpenPra xis/article/view/304 Questions? Please connect with us! @jnwhiting juswhiti@indiana.edu @DrBSI illowskybarbara@fhda.edu @johnhiltoniii johnhiltoniii@byu.edu
Editor's Notes
- Not sure if we need any information posted about DeAnza College. De Anza College is a large suburban community college in California, located in the region known as Silicon Valley. It operates on the quarter system. The college serves approximately 23,000 students (over 40% full-time). Locally, it has the highest graduation rate (associate degree) with over 60% of its full-time students earning the degree within three years. Asians (38%) and Latinos (24%) are the two largest ethnic groups at the college.
- As mentioned previously, the text for this course was offered free of charge online; however, there was also a hard copy available for purchase for under $30. Forty-eight percent of students reported purchasing a text for this class. The rest of the students either used the online version or printed off a PDF copy of the text. Of the 56 students who reported purchasing texts, all but eleven reported spending $100 or less, and 57 percent reported spending under $40. Considering the cost of the hard copy, the “$100 or less” could refer to one instructor whose students purchased the optional hardcopy note pack from the campus bookstore instead of downloading and/or printing them. Many students (61 percent) reported printing materials for the course. Of those who did, 82 percent reported spending $30 or less, with 46 percent spending less than $10. Many students reported that they did not purchase any texts for the course. When we asked them why not, the vast majority of them (84 percent) answered “the text was available free of charge online.” In an answer to our second research question of student perceptions about cost of OER, our findings indicate that whether students purchased a hard copy of the text or printed off pages, it appears that most students experienced significant savings relative to the average costs of college textbooks.
- We can use either chart, but I actually think that using the pie chart is more compelling (I don’t normally say that), as we can show easily that 87% said same or better.
- This figure shows students response in what ways was Collaborative Statistics better, the same or worse than traditional textbooks. It fared better in clarity, examples, cost and online material. It was the same in organization and relevance. CS was worse in specifics and color. There were also some general comments that were neutral.
- A coding scheme was developed and used to code answers as, “positive, negative, and neutral.” The answers were then categorized as General, Organization, Clarity, Relevance, Specifics, Examples, Price, Online, & Color/Graphics. Some examples of negative relevance: “It needs improvement as our instructor substituted material for chapters that were not very comprehensive.” and “It was a good text but not good enough to rely on for the sole purpose of learning, I prefer teacher notes since it simplifies everything for me.”
- A coding scheme was developed and used to code answers as, “positive, negative, and neutral.” The answers were then categorized as General, Organization, Clarity, Relevance, Specifics, Examples, Price, Online, & Color/Graphics. Some examples of positive
- A coding scheme was developed and used to code answers as, “positive, negative, and neutral.” The answers were then categorized as General, Organization, Clarity, Relevance, Specifics, Examples, Price, Online, & Color/Graphics. Some examples of negative relevance: “It needs improvement as our instructor substituted material for chapters that were not very comprehensive.” and “It was a good text but not good enough to rely on for the sole purpose of learning, I prefer teacher notes since it simplifies everything for me.”
- Two final open response questions were utilized in order to help students elaborate on their feelings regarding the textbook. First, in order to prompt students to record any negative impressions of the textbook, students were asked about their biggest complaint regarding the textbook. In responding to the question “What do you like best about this text?” students’ answers fell mainly into three categories: examples, online benefits, and price. Statements regarding examples were similar to those discussed previously. Student comments with regard to online benefits are illustrated by the following comments made by the students:
- As mentioned previously, the text for this course was offered free of charge online; however, there was also a hard copy available for purchase for under $30. Forty-eight percent of students reported purchasing a text for this class. The rest of the students either used the online version or printed off a PDF copy of the text. Of the 56 students who reported purchasing texts, all but eleven reported spending $100 or less, and 57 percent reported spending under $40. Considering the cost of the hard copy, the “$100 or less” could refer to one instructor whose students purchased the optional hardcopy note pack from the campus bookstore instead of downloading and/or printing them. Many students (61 percent) reported printing materials for the course. Of those who did, 82 percent reported spending $30 or less, with 46 percent spending less than $10. Many students reported that they did not purchase any texts for the course. When we asked them why not, the vast majority of them (84 percent) answered “the text was available free of charge online.” In an answer to our second research question of student perceptions about cost of OER, our findings indicate that whether students purchased a hard copy of the text or printed off pages, it appears that most students experienced significant savings relative to the average costs of college textbooks.
- Overall, 93% of students said that the book was as good or better than traditional textbooks. Only five students gave specific responses to the question, “Why did you rate the OER textbooks as being worse than traditional texts” and there was no observable pattern in their responses. Some felt there were errors; others felt it was too difficult to understand.
- Participants were asked, “Overall, what do you think of the text used in this course?” All neutral answers given to this question were coded as general, and, as stated previously, were generic answers such as “It’s okay.” Figure 6 illustrates the answers to the question “Overall, what did you think of the text used in this course?”
- This may not actually be that interesting. We can delete it if we need more time.
- This may not actually be that interesting. We can delete it if we need more time.
- Overall, student responses to using both Collaborative Statistics and the updated Introductory Statistics were positive. For both open textbooks, students overwhelmingly reported the text was the same as, or better than their traditional texts. In response to open-ended questions, both groups of students provided similar comments.