This document discusses pricing under oligopoly and provides classifications and models of oligopoly. It defines oligopoly as a market with a few sellers dealing in homogeneous or differentiated products. Oligopoly can be classified based on the nature of products, entry of firms, price leadership, agreements between firms, and coordination between firms. Models of non-collusive oligopoly discussed include Cournot's, Bertrand's, Edgeworth's, and Stackelberg's models which make different assumptions around firms' outputs and pricing decisions.
This PPT includes Oligopoly Market. It is explained in detail.
This is for educational purpose only. If you own any of the content please let me know. We are not here to hurt anyone's emotion. Please try to co-operate and use this for educational purposes only.
Models of Oligopoly
Cournot’s duopoly model
Sweezy’s kinked demand curve model
Price leadership models
Collusive models :The Cartel Arrangement
The Game Theory
Prisoner’s Dilemma
Price leadership Model
Collusive models The Cartel Arrangement
Students should be able to:
Understand the assumptions of perfect competition and be able to explain the behaviour of firms in this market structure.
Understand the significance of firms as price-takers in perfectly competitive markets. An understanding of the meaning of shut-down point is required. The impact of entry into and exit from the industry should be considered.
Students should be able to:
Understand the characteristics of this market structure with particular reference to the interdependence of firms
Explain the behaviour of firms in this market structure
Explain reasons for collusive and non-collusive behaviour
Evaluate the reasons why firms may wish to pursue both overt and tacit collusion
This PPT includes Oligopoly Market. It is explained in detail.
This is for educational purpose only. If you own any of the content please let me know. We are not here to hurt anyone's emotion. Please try to co-operate and use this for educational purposes only.
Models of Oligopoly
Cournot’s duopoly model
Sweezy’s kinked demand curve model
Price leadership models
Collusive models :The Cartel Arrangement
The Game Theory
Prisoner’s Dilemma
Price leadership Model
Collusive models The Cartel Arrangement
Students should be able to:
Understand the assumptions of perfect competition and be able to explain the behaviour of firms in this market structure.
Understand the significance of firms as price-takers in perfectly competitive markets. An understanding of the meaning of shut-down point is required. The impact of entry into and exit from the industry should be considered.
Students should be able to:
Understand the characteristics of this market structure with particular reference to the interdependence of firms
Explain the behaviour of firms in this market structure
Explain reasons for collusive and non-collusive behaviour
Evaluate the reasons why firms may wish to pursue both overt and tacit collusion
The presentation sums up the telecom sector in India till 2015 and how the oligopoly market wars goes between the top companies. Also the kinked demand curve that is generated due to oligopoly market analysis. It has got it all!
Students should be able to:
Use simple game theory to illustrate the interdependence that exists in oligopolistic markets
Understanding the prisoners’ dilemma and a simple two firm/two outcome model. Students should analyse the advantages/disadvantages of being a first mover
Students will not be expected to have an understanding of the Nash Equilibrium
A market can be defined as a group of firms willing and able to sell a similar product or service to the same potential buyers.
Imperfect competition covers all situations where there is neither pure competition nor pure monopoly.
Perfect competition and pure monopoly are very unlikely to be found in the real world.
In the real world, it is the imperfect competition lying between perfect competition and pure monopoly.
The fundamental distinguishing characteristic of imperfect competition is that average revenue curve slopes downwards throughout its length, but it slopes downwards at different rates in different categories of imperfect competition.
Monopoly refers to the market situation where there is a
Single seller selling a product which has no close substitutes.
Monopolies are characterized by a lack of economic competition to produce the good or service, a lack of viable substitute goods, and the existence of a high monopoly price well above the firm's marginal cost that leads to a high monopoly profit
The word “oligopoly” comes from the Greek “oligos” meaning "little or small” and “polein” meaning “to sell.” When “oligos” is used in the plural, it means “few” ,few firms or few sellers.
DEFINATION:
Oligopoly is that form of market where there are few firms and there is natural interdependence among the firms regarding price and output policy.
2. Pricing Under Oligopoly
• Oligopoly Meaning:
• Oligopoly has been derived from two Words
oligi and pollien.
• ‘Oligi’ means a ‘few’ and ‘Pollien’ means
‘sellers’.
3. Oligopoly
Definition
Oligopoly is defined as a market
situation in which there are a few
sellers or producers dealing in either
the homogeneous or differentiated
products.
4. Classification of Oligopoly
Oligopoly market can classified on following bases.
1) Nature of product:
on the basis of nature of products, Oligopoly is Classified as
Pure and differentiated oligopoly.
a) Pure oligopoly is one in case of which the product produced
by the competing firms in the market is identical or
homogeneous.
a) Differentiated oligopoly is supposed to exist in the market,
when the firms in the market produce and sell the non-homogeneous.
5. Classification of Oligopoly
2. Entry of firms: On the basis of freedom of entry
Oligopoly Market classified as ‘open’ and ‘Closed’
oligopoly.
a) Open oligopoly: when the new firms are allowed
to enter in to the market. It is called open
oligopoly.
b) Closed oligopoly: when the new firms are not
allowed to enter in to the market. It is called
open oligopoly.
6. Classification of Oligopoly
3. Price leadership:
Based on Price leadership the oligopoly can be
classified as ‘Partial’ and ‘Full’ oligopoly.
a) Partial oligopoly: when a large firm in the market
is recognized as price leader, the other smaller
firms in the market follow the price fixed by the
leader firm.
b) Full Oligopoly: Where there is no leading firm to
determine the price of a product in the market.
The firm may be engaged in price competition in
the case of full oligopoly.
7. Classification of Oligopoly
4) Agreement or Collusion:
The oligopoly market can be classified as ‘Collusive’ or
‘Non collusive’ on the basis of agreement or collusion
among firms in the market.
a) Collusive Oligopoly: When different firms in the
oligopoly market have some informal or formal
agreement about price, output, division of market,
profit sharing etc.
b) Non Collusive Oligopoly: When there is no
agreement or collusion among the firms.
8. Classification of Oligopoly
5) Degree of Co-ordination: On the basis of degree
of co-ordination the oligopoly market can be of the
types of ‘Organized’ and ‘Syndicated’ oligopoly.
a) Organized oligopoly: When the different firms
in the market avoid price competition by
organizing themselves into a central association
for fixing price, output quotas etc.
b) Syndicated oligopoly: All the firms in the market
crate a syndicate or cartel which is a common
selling organization for the sale of output
turned out by all firms.
9. Characteristics of Oligopoly
1. Few Sellers
2. Control over supply
3. Inter-dependence of firms
4. Conflicting attitudes of firms.
5. Lack of uniformity of size of firm
6. Group behavior
7. Advertising and selling costs
8. Price rigidity
9. Intense Competition
10.Indeterminateness of demand curve
10. Non- Collusive Oligopoly Models
1) Augustin Cournot’s Model
2) Bertrand’s Model
3) Edgeworth’s Model
4) Stackelberg,s Model
11. Augustin Cournot’s Model
Oligopoly was made by the French economist
Augustin Cournot in 1839. is model rests upon
the following main assumptions:
1. There are Two firms in the market, A and B
2. Each Firm owns the spring of mineral water
which is identical.
3. The cost of production is zero
4. Each firm is faced with a linear, negatively
sloping market demand curve.
12. Assumptions Continued…..
5. The productive capacity of each firm is unlimited.
6. Each firm considers itself to be independent in
determining its price or output. It means the mutual
interdependence is ignored.
7. Each firm assumes that the supply of rival firm will
remain unchanged.
Given the Set of assumptions, when ultimately long run
equilibrium determined, each firm will share the market
equally. Price will be zero because of zero cost of
production and the long run equilibrium under perfect
competition.
The model is explained through Fig.
17. Bertrand’s oligopoly Model
The oligopoly (duopoly) model developed by Joseph
Bertram in 1883 was a modification upon Cournot’s
duopoly solution.
Assumptions:
1. There are Two firms in the market, A and B
2. Each Firm owns the spring of mineral water which
is identical.
3. The cost of production is zero
4. Each firm have unlimited production capacity.
18. Assumptions:
5. Each firm considers itself to be independent
in making the price – output decision. In other
words, the mutual interdependence is ignored
by them.
6. The most significant assumption in this
model, on account of which it departs from
Cournot’s solution is that each fierm belives
that the price of rival firm remains constant.
19.
20.
21. Edgeworth’s model
*In the field of Classical oligopoly(duopoly)
analysis was made by F. Y. Edgeworth in 1857.
*This model made a significant departure from
the duopoly models given by Cournot and
Bertrand.
The Change in this model is Edgeworth’s
assumption that the productive capacity of each
firm in the duopoly market is limited.
22. Assumptions of the Model
1) There are two firms, ‘A’ and ‘B’
2) The products of the two firms are homogeneous
3) Both the firms have equal per unit cost.
4) The productive capacity of each firm is limited.
5) Both the firms sell their maximum possible
output at the competitive price, where price
becomes equal to average cost.
23. Assumptions of the Model
6. Each firm considers itself to be independent in
making the price-output decision. It means the
mutual interdependence is ignored by each of
the firm.
7. Each firm assumes that the price of the rival
will remain unchanged.
24.
25. Stackelberg’s Duopoly Model
This is an extension of Cournot’s Model
The essence of Stackelberg’s model is the
problem of leadership and followership.
He assumed that the rival acts as his follower
and tries to maximizes his profits, given the
output decided by the leader.
Stackelberg pointed out that each duopolist
acting as a leader or follower would attempt to
maximize his profits.