OECD/DAC - Results Community October 2018 Workshop - Results approaches for the SDG era: shared challenges and collective solutions
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•342 views
Results approaches for the SDG era: shared challenges and collective solutions. This workshop is part of the OECD/DAC Results Community that took place in October 2018. This presentation looks at Using the SDGs as a framework for shared results.
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to OECD/DAC - Results Community October 2018 Workshop - Results approaches for the SDG era: shared challenges and collective solutions
Similar to OECD/DAC - Results Community October 2018 Workshop - Results approaches for the SDG era: shared challenges and collective solutions (20)
More from Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD-DAC)
More from Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD-DAC) (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
OECD/DAC - Results Community October 2018 Workshop - Results approaches for the SDG era: shared challenges and collective solutions
- 1. Results approaches for the SDG era: shared challenges and collective solutions Workshop of the Results Community OECD Conference Centre, Paris 29-30 October 2018 Tweet using #results2030 / @OECDdev
- 2. Using the SDGs as a shared framework for results – emerging findings from country- level case studies Co-chairs: Rosie Zwart and John Egan, OECD Tuesday 29 October 2018 14:00-17:45 Results Community Workshop Session 2 twitter: #results2030
- 3. Overview of the session: 1. Brief presentation from OECD 2. Panel interventions from research participants 3. Group discussions 4. Presentations by related initiatives 5. Feedback and summary
- 4. Using the SDGs as a framework for shared results: demonstrating good practice Overview, preliminary findings Rosie Zwart, Policy Analyst, Results Team
- 5. Rationale for case study project • Results community: internal pressures to report results domestically can contradict commitments to support and align to country results frameworks, and country-led data • Interest in how partners and providers can, in practice, use the SDGs as a shared framework for results • This can: – Increase ownership, harmonisation of indicators – Reduce duplication and costly data collection – Create a platform for dialogue and learning • Builds on existing analysis – takes a “deep dive”
- 6. Focus on 3 SDG targets/ indicators Target: 4.1 By 2030, ensure that all girls and boys complete free, equitable and quality primary and secondary education leading to relevant and effective learning outcomes Indicator: 4.1.1 Proportion of children and young people: (a) in grades 2/3; (b) at the end of primary; and (c) at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in (i) reading and (ii) mathematics, by sex Target: 6.2. By 2030, achieve access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all and end open defecation, paying special attention to the needs of women and girls and those in vulnerable situations. Indicator: 6.2.1. Proportion of population using safely-managed sanitation services, including a hand-washing facility with soap and water Target: 7.1. By 2030, ensure universal access to affordable, reliable and modern energy services. Indicator: 7.1.1. Proportion of population with access to electricity
- 8. Approach • Fieldwork and indicator analysis components • Strong support from donor focal points, project steering group • Complete by April 2018 – reports will be available online Case Study 1: Case Study 2: Case Study 3: Donor agency focal point:SDG 4.1.1 SDG 6.2.1 SDG 7.1.1 Partner country fieldwork: Ethiopia Ethiopia Finland MFA Kenya Kenya European Commission Myanmar Myanmar DFAT Australia
- 9. Preliminary findings: the Kenya case • SDGs integrated into medium-term plan and measurement framework. Opportunity for development co-operation providers to align to the SDGs through Kenya’s country results framework, a work in progress. • Monitoring of access to sanitation (SDG 6.2.1) is fragmented; Pilot SDG 6 reporting = strong institutional framework, which could now be supported by development of a single data system, and by addressing specific monitoring challenges. • Monitoring of access to electricity (SDG 7.1.1) well- established, government-led and driven by high profile targets. BUT data quality and use challenges amplified as electrification moves beyond the grid.
- 10. Overall preliminary findings – for discussion Alignment • Many similar, but slightly different indicators (SDG alignment is mixed) – little data. • Lack of internal harmonisation by individual providers between corporate indicators (tier 2) and their country-assistance strategy indicators. • At country-level, potential more co-ordinated approach to results and data through sector-level working groups – linking to overall SDG institutional set up (central agencies) Measurement & use • Need for capacity building for data generation and use: integrated into development co-operation investments: • Disaggregation M/F, urban/rural • Single source of data – integrated systems (national and sub-national) • Enhanced support for use of data – platforms for dialogue
- 11. Next steps • Validation of findings in Ethiopia, Myanmar (Nov) • Further analysis of indicator inventories required – can we assess the degree of alignment? traffic light methodology • Publication of indicator inventories? Data? • Planning for extension of project – different SDGs in other countries?
- 13. 1. How can the SDGs be used as a shared framework for results at country- level? 2. What challenges & opportunities have emerged for alignment, measurement and use of SDG-aligned results data? 3. How can the OECD/DAC Results Community further support? Panellists: • Kenya central agency: Mr. Stephen Odhiambo Nabakho, Chief Economist, The National Treasury & Planning (VC) • Kenya line ministry: Eng. Rose Ngure, Deputy Director, Sewerage and Sanitation, Ministry of Water and Sanitation, Kenya (VC) • Donor focal point: Julia Kroemer, Results Reporting Officer, DG International Co-operation and Development, European Commission Panellists – responses to the preliminary findings
- 14. • Each table has been given a booklet of questions • Appoint a facilitator and a scribe for each group • Four questions, make sure you have time to discuss all the questions and agree on and record a response Please note: there are no right and wrong answers, and this is not a data collection exercise; you are being asked to agree on multi-choice options as a way to stimulate discussion and debate. Group discussions 15:15 -16:15
- 15. • Mr. Simon Kisira, Head, Strategic Planning, Knowledge Management, Monitoring and Evaluation, NEPAD (VC) • Mr. Isaora Zefania Romalahy & Ms. Andrea Ries, Co-chairs, Global Partnership Initiative on Results and Mutual Accountability • Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Technical Programme Advisor, PARIS21 Use of country-results frameworks and data in the context of the SDGs – presentations from other initiatives
Editor's Notes
- Standard session page
- [make sure tables are well distributed for group work] Introductory remarks by chair, introduce co-chair (JE) JE: This session focuses in on an OECD Results Community case-study project being undertaken in 2018 – it is only part way through. You will all have seen the discussion paper which goes with this project, which provides a detailed outline. The purpose of the project is to: generate evidence, analysis and good practice examples of how development co-operation providers and partners can concretely use the SDG framework as an entry point for co-ordinating around, investing in and using country-led results frameworks and data which are aligned to the SDGs. Over the course of the session we want to take the opportunity to reflect on preliminary findings, and think about next steps. We want to ensure the finding are helpful, at headquarters and in partner countries. Present overview of format of the session
- JE: Will start with a brief presentation from Rosie, who is leading the project RZ: thanks. just brief overview and highlight some preliminary findings. Also some guidance about the things we want to discuss in the group sessions
- Why are we doing the work? The project builds on past work and responds to ideas and feedback from this community.
- Three case studies: focus in on three SDG targets/ indicators (taking the wider goal into account) – all 3 from relatively traditional DC sectors, but each comes with its own challenges and opportunities, and differing levels of complexity. Looking at individual targets, but acknowledge the inter-connectedness.
- Analytic framework 3 different elements to the analytic framework – plus three aspects of analysis. (go through) Have used this to structure data collection – and eventually analysis and reporting.
- So how are we actually doing the project? Explain project structure and methodology. Thank those involved as donor focal points and in the steering group (UNDP, NEPAD, GPI, Belgium MFA, Paris21 and internal experts). We hope that their involvement is of benefit. Technical reports by January – then synthesis by April. Present at HLPF – feeds into GPEDC reporting.
- In Kenya – in September we spoke to 13 different agencies: central agencies, line ministries, implementing agencies, CSO and DPs Overall, we found similarities and contrasts between the two indicators. This is just a snapshot of the results – and there is much more detail in the discussion paper which was circulated prior the workshop. You’ll hear more about sanitation from one of our panellists. Strong commitment from government but many challenges Electricity – real time data on connections but also challenges – especially as you move beyond the grid.
- [Go through findings] We will ask them to discuss these during the group work.
- Fieldwork will help us to understand whether the findings apply in other contexts [Quickly show participants the spreadsheets] – thank those who contributed data and indicators. We can publish these spreadsheets online – value in this? We also want to get your feedback on whether we should extend the project next year – more indicators in other countries – which?
- JE: Introduce panellists. We have asked them to respond to project from their own perspective, and in light of preliminary findings from the project Each speaks for 2-3 minutes Stephen is leading SDG implementation in Kenya – he will talk about Kenya’s journey towards implementing the SDGs Rose – is the focal point in the Kenyan government for SDG 6.2.1 – she will talk about Kenya’s efforts to monitor and report against SDG 6 Andrea represents the EU which acted as donor focal point for the Kenya fieldwork – presenting perspectives from Kenya and HQ After RZ fields questions to the panellists then summarises discussion Finish by 15.15
- JE: Groups at tables to discuss and respond to a set of questions (sheet for responses provided). Suggest 10-15 minutes for each question Group appoints a facilitator and a scribe Group encouraged to reach a consensus on each question – but also note their comments. Coffee will be served afterwards at 16.15.
- We now have an opportunity to hear from other initiatives focused on alignment and ownership of results frameworks and data in line with the SDGs, we’ve asked them also to comment on synergies with the OECD SDG project. JE introduces presenters: NEPAD Agency: Mr. Simon Kisira, Head – Knowledge Management and Monitoring & Evaluation, NEPAD - NEPAD’s work regarding aligning country-results frameworks with Agenda 2063 and Agenda 2030 GPI on results and mutual accountability co-chairs: Isaora Zefania Romalahy , senior statistician economist, Office of the prime minister, Government of Madagascar & Andrea Ries, Senior policy advisor, Swiss Agency for Development Co-operation – PARIS21: Mr. Rajiv Ranjan– Use of the ADAPT tool to enhance support for and use of country-led results data. As time allows – JE fields clarification questions from the floor and sums up finish at 17:00