This document discusses the initial impacts and development of nuclear weapons and strategy between major powers from 1945-1980s. It covers topics like the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, calls for international control over nuclear weapons, the failed Baruch Plan, doctrines of massive retaliation and mutual assured destruction, flexible response strategies, and programs like the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and Strategic Defense Initiative. The overall nuclear arms race and strategies are analyzed from the perspective of the US, USSR, and other involved countries.
This document provides an introduction to the two-volume encyclopedia "Weapons of Mass Destruction: An Encyclopedia of Worldwide Policy, Technology, and History". Volume I focuses on chemical and biological weapons. It discusses how the term "weapons of mass destruction" emerged in the 1930s to refer to indiscriminate killing through modern weapons like aircraft and chemical weapons. While many states developed chemical and biological weapons during World War II and the Cold War, the U.S. military was never enthusiastic about their use and saw them as deterrents only to be used in retaliation. By the early 1990s, the U.S. had abandoned their offensive use while maintaining research programs. The encyclopedia aims to provide a comprehensive
Regulation of scientific experiments leading to loss ofVishnu Manoharan
This document discusses the regulation of scientific experiments that result in loss of human life. It provides background on how science has increasingly been used for military purposes over time, especially with the world wars accelerating this relationship. It discusses several international treaties and conventions that have been established to regulate weapons and warfare, including those that banned chemical weapons, biological weapons, and restricted nuclear proliferation. Specific treaties mentioned include the Geneva Protocol, Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Biological Weapons Convention, and Environmental Modification Convention. The document also discusses the nuclear arms race between the US and Soviet Union during the Cold War.
The document discusses the history of nuclear weapons, including the first U.S. nuclear test in 1945 and subsequent bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It also covers the Cold War arms race between the U.S. and Soviet Union, crises like the Cuban Missile Crisis, efforts at nuclear deterrence, and later arms reduction treaties. Current concerns about nuclear weapons include aging Cold War arsenals, proliferation, accidents, unauthorized use, and terrorism.
IMPERIAL WAR MUSEUM=COLD WAR EXHIBIT-POSTER COMMENTARYDr Jack B ReVelle
The document summarizes exhibits at the American Air Museum at Duxford in the UK that focus on aircraft and people from World War II and the Cold War. It provides details on nuclear weapons and the US Air Force's Strategic Air Command, including accidents involving nuclear-armed bombers and the role of Jack ReVelle in responding to accidents and assisting with nuclear bomb disposal. It includes photos of ReVelle preparing for a training flight and the Lockheed T-33 Shooting Star aircraft.
During the Cold War arms race of the 1950s, both the United States and Soviet Union significantly expanded their nuclear arsenals through technological advancements like ICBMs, nuclear submarines, and bombers. This arms buildup increased fears among the American public of potential nuclear attack. John F. Kennedy was elected president in 1960 in part by claiming the US had fallen behind the Soviets, and his administration approved the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba in 1961, which failed and strengthened Cuba's ties to the Soviet Union.
Nuclear Threat The 4th World War Will Never HappenAnishka Lunawat
The document discusses the possibility of a Fourth World War occurring due to nuclear threats. It outlines scenarios where such a war could start, such as conflicts escalating in the Middle East or between India/Pakistan and China/Taiwan. However, the document concludes that a full-scale nuclear war will likely never happen due to the mutually assured destruction it would cause, with no real winners. All countries are aware that nuclear weapons would result in devastating destruction for all sides.
The document discusses nuclear weapons, including their history, types, effects, and countries that possess them. It begins with definitions of nuclear weapons and descriptions of the massive explosive energy they produce. It then covers the key events in the history of nuclear weapons development during World War 2 and the Cold War. The document also examines the various effects of nuclear explosions and weapons, such as blast, thermal radiation, and fallout.
This document provides an introduction to the two-volume encyclopedia "Weapons of Mass Destruction: An Encyclopedia of Worldwide Policy, Technology, and History". Volume I focuses on chemical and biological weapons. It discusses how the term "weapons of mass destruction" emerged in the 1930s to refer to indiscriminate killing through modern weapons like aircraft and chemical weapons. While many states developed chemical and biological weapons during World War II and the Cold War, the U.S. military was never enthusiastic about their use and saw them as deterrents only to be used in retaliation. By the early 1990s, the U.S. had abandoned their offensive use while maintaining research programs. The encyclopedia aims to provide a comprehensive
Regulation of scientific experiments leading to loss ofVishnu Manoharan
This document discusses the regulation of scientific experiments that result in loss of human life. It provides background on how science has increasingly been used for military purposes over time, especially with the world wars accelerating this relationship. It discusses several international treaties and conventions that have been established to regulate weapons and warfare, including those that banned chemical weapons, biological weapons, and restricted nuclear proliferation. Specific treaties mentioned include the Geneva Protocol, Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Biological Weapons Convention, and Environmental Modification Convention. The document also discusses the nuclear arms race between the US and Soviet Union during the Cold War.
The document discusses the history of nuclear weapons, including the first U.S. nuclear test in 1945 and subsequent bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It also covers the Cold War arms race between the U.S. and Soviet Union, crises like the Cuban Missile Crisis, efforts at nuclear deterrence, and later arms reduction treaties. Current concerns about nuclear weapons include aging Cold War arsenals, proliferation, accidents, unauthorized use, and terrorism.
IMPERIAL WAR MUSEUM=COLD WAR EXHIBIT-POSTER COMMENTARYDr Jack B ReVelle
The document summarizes exhibits at the American Air Museum at Duxford in the UK that focus on aircraft and people from World War II and the Cold War. It provides details on nuclear weapons and the US Air Force's Strategic Air Command, including accidents involving nuclear-armed bombers and the role of Jack ReVelle in responding to accidents and assisting with nuclear bomb disposal. It includes photos of ReVelle preparing for a training flight and the Lockheed T-33 Shooting Star aircraft.
During the Cold War arms race of the 1950s, both the United States and Soviet Union significantly expanded their nuclear arsenals through technological advancements like ICBMs, nuclear submarines, and bombers. This arms buildup increased fears among the American public of potential nuclear attack. John F. Kennedy was elected president in 1960 in part by claiming the US had fallen behind the Soviets, and his administration approved the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba in 1961, which failed and strengthened Cuba's ties to the Soviet Union.
Nuclear Threat The 4th World War Will Never HappenAnishka Lunawat
The document discusses the possibility of a Fourth World War occurring due to nuclear threats. It outlines scenarios where such a war could start, such as conflicts escalating in the Middle East or between India/Pakistan and China/Taiwan. However, the document concludes that a full-scale nuclear war will likely never happen due to the mutually assured destruction it would cause, with no real winners. All countries are aware that nuclear weapons would result in devastating destruction for all sides.
The document discusses nuclear weapons, including their history, types, effects, and countries that possess them. It begins with definitions of nuclear weapons and descriptions of the massive explosive energy they produce. It then covers the key events in the history of nuclear weapons development during World War 2 and the Cold War. The document also examines the various effects of nuclear explosions and weapons, such as blast, thermal radiation, and fallout.
The document discusses several aspects of the Vietnam War from the US perspective, including:
1) How the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution gave President Lyndon Johnson authority to escalate US involvement without a formal declaration of war.
2) The increasing US troop levels from 16,000 in 1963 to 500,000 by 1968.
3) The tactics and challenges of fighting in the Vietnamese jungle against an enemy that used guerilla warfare and hid among the civilian population.
4) The US strategy of using air power and defoliants like Agent Orange to destroy jungle cover and force the Viet Cong into open battles, but this failed to change the course of the war.
The document provides background information on the Vietnam War from the US perspective. It describes the US strategy of using air power and search and destroy missions to counter Viet Cong guerilla tactics. However, the US underestimated the resolve of the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong and had difficulty winning the support of South Vietnamese people. Over time, as US troop and casualty numbers rose without clear success, the war became increasingly unpopular back home.
A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission (fission bomb) or from a combination of fission and fusion reactions (thermonuclear bomb). Both bomb types release large quantities of energy from relatively small amounts of matter.
Today, nine states have nuclear weapons and many more can easily acquire those, although only five states are officially recognized as possessing nuclear weapons by the 1968 nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Those are
• The United States (1945)
• Russia (1949)
• The United Kingdom (1952)
• France (1960) and
• China (1964)
Four states never joined the NPT but are known to possess nuclear weapons:
• Israel
• India (1974)
• Pakistan (1998) and
• North Korea (2006)
The document provides a detailed overview of key events and developments during the Cold War period between the United States and Soviet Union after World War II. It discusses the formation of opposing military alliances like NATO and the Warsaw Pact, as well as conflicts and crises over places like Berlin, Cuba, and Korea that raised tensions between the two superpowers. It also examines related domestic policies and events in the US, including McCarthyism and the arms race, that were influenced by the standoff with the Soviet bloc.
The document discusses the theory of nuclear peace, which argues that nuclear weapons can induce stability and decrease the chances of crisis escalation between countries. It presents arguments that when mutual second-strike capabilities exist between two countries, the costs of war are too high, leading to restraint. Examples provided include stability during the Cold War and peace talks between India and Pakistan. However, critics argue that decision-makers are not always rational and could make hasty decisions leading to nuclear war, or that technological developments could undermine mutual second-strike capabilities.
Nuclear Weapons: Their Effect On Us & Our World - Courtney Carter Courtney Carter
I chose this topic because everyone in the global community, including myself, needs to be informed about nuclear weapons and how they could affect us in a very major way if the global society doesn't keep each other in check. I enjoyed learning more about nuclear weapons than I already knew and I hope you do too.
The United States pursued a policy of containment against the spread of communism following World War II. This led to the origins of the Cold War between the US and Soviet Union. The Truman Doctrine and NATO alliance in Europe were early Cold War policies to counter Soviet expansion. The US fought wars in Korea and Vietnam to prevent the spread of communism in Asia according to the containment policy. At home, the Cold War threat of nuclear war and fears of communism affected American society.
1) Weapons of mass destruction such as chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons have enormous destructive potential despite their small size and relatively low cost of production. They can also be deployed on ballistic missiles and are difficult to contain due to the threat of proliferation.
2) Nuclear weapons function through either fission, which splits atomic nuclei, or fusion, which fuses atomic nuclei. Fission weapons were first developed by the United States and are less sophisticated with lower yields, while thermonuclear fusion weapons have much higher yields but require more advanced technology.
3) A hypothetical 150-kiloton nuclear weapon detonated in Manhattan would result in 900,000 injuries and 800,000 deaths, overwhelming the local medical
Photographer Martin Miller has compiled a visual retrospective of weapons of mass destruction from the Cold War era. The collection includes black and white photographs of early atomic bombs like Little Boy and Fat Man dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as later thermonuclear bombs, bombers, missiles, and other doomsday machines developed by the United States and Soviet Union. Miller notes that although the term WMD is now common, during the Cold War there was a very real threat of civilization ending in nuclear war as strategy and technology rapidly advanced competing arsenals of mass destruction. The chilling photographs provide a glimpse into the dawn of the atomic age and subsequent arms race.
This document discusses weapons of mass destruction, focusing on nuclear weapons and biological weapons. It provides details on the types of nuclear weapons, countries that possess them, and historical nuclear accidents and incidents. It also outlines biological warfare agents, countries that possess biological weapons, and methods of delivery. Examples are given of past uses of biological weapons, including by Imperial Japan during WWII. The large-scale impacts of potential uses of biological weapons are also noted.
The Cold War began in 1945 after World War II and lasted until 1991. It was a period of intense rivalry and hostility between the United States and the Soviet Union, who emerged as the two dominant superpowers after WWII. Both nations increased military spending and built up nuclear arsenals, risking global destruction through nuclear war. The conflict included numerous proxy wars around the world and heightened tensions, such as the Cuban Missile Crisis that brought the world close to nuclear war. In the late 1980s, reforms in the Soviet Union under Gorbachev led to the fall of the Berlin Wall and the eventual dissolution of the Soviet Union, bringing an end to the over 40-year long Cold War.
The document provides background information on the Cuban Missile Crisis through a series of flashcards. It explains that prior to Castro, Cuba was ruled by the corrupt Batista who was supported by the US. Castro introduced reforms but this concerned the US and tensions grew. The failed Bay of Pigs invasion pushed Cuba closer to the USSR. In 1962, US spy planes discovered Soviet missile sites in Cuba, escalating the crisis. JFK imposed a naval blockade and negotiated with Khrushchev to remove the missiles in exchange for promises not to invade Cuba. Both sides gained concessions but the world avoided nuclear war.
The document summarizes key events during the Kennedy-Khrushchev era from 1959-1964, a period of increased tensions between the US and Soviet Union during the Cold War. Some of the major events discussed include the Soviet launch of Sputnik, escalating conflict in Cuba under Castro's leadership, the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, construction of the Berlin Wall, the Cuban Missile Crisis that brought the two countries close to nuclear war, and increasing US involvement in Vietnam. The document provides historical context surrounding these pivotal moments between the two superpowers.
Unit #4 Nuclear Proliferation Student VersionNick Allgyer
The document summarizes the key events of the Cold War nuclear arms race between the United States and Soviet Union. It began after WWII when the US created the first atomic bomb and used it against Japan. The Soviets tested their first bomb in 1949, starting a nuclear arms competition. Both countries developed more powerful hydrogen bombs and delivery systems like ICBMs throughout the 1950s and 60s. Arms control treaties in the late Cold War aimed to limit nuclear stockpiles and curb proliferation.
The document discusses the methods used by the United States to contain communism during the Cold War. It describes how the Cold War began in Europe and expanded to Asia and other parts of the world. The US and Soviet Union engaged in proxy conflicts and competed for influence over newly independent nations. This competition eventually led to a dangerous nuclear arms race between the two superpowers, with both sides developing powerful new weapons like hydrogen bombs and missiles. The strategy of deterrence, also called Mutual Assured Destruction, emerged to describe the policy of maintaining a balance of nuclear terror.
The United States dropped two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, killing over 120,000 people. This remains the only use of nuclear weapons in warfare to date. Japan refused to surrender after facing firebombing and the Allied demand for unconditional surrender. In response, the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima on August 6 and Nagasaki on August 9. Japan surrendered on August 15, ending World War II.
Cuban missile crisis Daniel Ortiz/Felipe Jimeno/Andres Felipe MejiaSocialStudiesCampestre
In October 1962, the U.S. discovered that the Soviet Union was secretly constructing nuclear missile bases in Cuba, just over 90 miles from Florida. This led to a 13-day standoff known as the Cuban Missile Crisis. President Kennedy instituted a blockade around Cuba and demanded the Soviets remove the missiles. After tense negotiations, the Soviets agreed to dismantle the Cuban missile bases in exchange for the U.S. promising not to invade Cuba and agreeing to remove its own missiles from Turkey. The crisis ended, but it brought the world dangerously close to nuclear war.
The document provides an overview of the Cold War between the United States and Soviet Union from 1945 to 1991. It discusses key events and policies that defined the escalating tensions and arms race between the two superpowers, including Winston Churchill's "Iron Curtain" speech in 1946 marking the beginning of the Cold War; the Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan establishing policies of containment and economic assistance for democratic nations; the formation of NATO in 1949; the Korean War from 1950 to 1953; McCarthyism and the Second Red Scare in the 1950s; and the Eisenhower administration's policies towards the Cold War in the 1950s.
The events of the Cold War including the civilian "Duck and Cover", propaganda film and the many books and movies about the Cold War. Discussion of Nuclear Arms Race and Nuclear Treaties and current status of Nuclear Weapons Stockpiles. Lists of the Nuclear Tests and the damages an Atomic Bomb can cause.
Adjunct Professor Joe Boisvert
The document discusses the nuclear arms race between the United States and Soviet Union from the late 1940s through the 1980s. It describes how both nations engaged in an escalating arms buildup, developing new weapons like ICBMs, SLBMs, and MIRVs. It also discusses key events and agreements that shaped the arms race, such as the Soviet testing of nuclear weapons in 1949, the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, and arms limitation treaties like SALT I and SALT II. Throughout this period, both superpowers pursued policies of deterrence based on the threat of mutually assured destruction.
Nuclear deterrence is a military strategy where the threat of nuclear retaliation is used to prevent aggression. During the Cold War, the doctrine of mutually assured destruction kept the US and USSR from attacking each other due to the threat of massive nuclear retaliation that could annihilate the attacker. The development of intercontinental ballistic missiles and second strike capabilities strengthened deterrence by ensuring both sides could launch a devastating response even after a first strike. The goal of nuclear deterrence is to intimidate enemies through the threat of unacceptable damage so they do not initiate conflict in the first place.
The document discusses several aspects of the Vietnam War from the US perspective, including:
1) How the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution gave President Lyndon Johnson authority to escalate US involvement without a formal declaration of war.
2) The increasing US troop levels from 16,000 in 1963 to 500,000 by 1968.
3) The tactics and challenges of fighting in the Vietnamese jungle against an enemy that used guerilla warfare and hid among the civilian population.
4) The US strategy of using air power and defoliants like Agent Orange to destroy jungle cover and force the Viet Cong into open battles, but this failed to change the course of the war.
The document provides background information on the Vietnam War from the US perspective. It describes the US strategy of using air power and search and destroy missions to counter Viet Cong guerilla tactics. However, the US underestimated the resolve of the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong and had difficulty winning the support of South Vietnamese people. Over time, as US troop and casualty numbers rose without clear success, the war became increasingly unpopular back home.
A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission (fission bomb) or from a combination of fission and fusion reactions (thermonuclear bomb). Both bomb types release large quantities of energy from relatively small amounts of matter.
Today, nine states have nuclear weapons and many more can easily acquire those, although only five states are officially recognized as possessing nuclear weapons by the 1968 nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Those are
• The United States (1945)
• Russia (1949)
• The United Kingdom (1952)
• France (1960) and
• China (1964)
Four states never joined the NPT but are known to possess nuclear weapons:
• Israel
• India (1974)
• Pakistan (1998) and
• North Korea (2006)
The document provides a detailed overview of key events and developments during the Cold War period between the United States and Soviet Union after World War II. It discusses the formation of opposing military alliances like NATO and the Warsaw Pact, as well as conflicts and crises over places like Berlin, Cuba, and Korea that raised tensions between the two superpowers. It also examines related domestic policies and events in the US, including McCarthyism and the arms race, that were influenced by the standoff with the Soviet bloc.
The document discusses the theory of nuclear peace, which argues that nuclear weapons can induce stability and decrease the chances of crisis escalation between countries. It presents arguments that when mutual second-strike capabilities exist between two countries, the costs of war are too high, leading to restraint. Examples provided include stability during the Cold War and peace talks between India and Pakistan. However, critics argue that decision-makers are not always rational and could make hasty decisions leading to nuclear war, or that technological developments could undermine mutual second-strike capabilities.
Nuclear Weapons: Their Effect On Us & Our World - Courtney Carter Courtney Carter
I chose this topic because everyone in the global community, including myself, needs to be informed about nuclear weapons and how they could affect us in a very major way if the global society doesn't keep each other in check. I enjoyed learning more about nuclear weapons than I already knew and I hope you do too.
The United States pursued a policy of containment against the spread of communism following World War II. This led to the origins of the Cold War between the US and Soviet Union. The Truman Doctrine and NATO alliance in Europe were early Cold War policies to counter Soviet expansion. The US fought wars in Korea and Vietnam to prevent the spread of communism in Asia according to the containment policy. At home, the Cold War threat of nuclear war and fears of communism affected American society.
1) Weapons of mass destruction such as chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons have enormous destructive potential despite their small size and relatively low cost of production. They can also be deployed on ballistic missiles and are difficult to contain due to the threat of proliferation.
2) Nuclear weapons function through either fission, which splits atomic nuclei, or fusion, which fuses atomic nuclei. Fission weapons were first developed by the United States and are less sophisticated with lower yields, while thermonuclear fusion weapons have much higher yields but require more advanced technology.
3) A hypothetical 150-kiloton nuclear weapon detonated in Manhattan would result in 900,000 injuries and 800,000 deaths, overwhelming the local medical
Photographer Martin Miller has compiled a visual retrospective of weapons of mass destruction from the Cold War era. The collection includes black and white photographs of early atomic bombs like Little Boy and Fat Man dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as later thermonuclear bombs, bombers, missiles, and other doomsday machines developed by the United States and Soviet Union. Miller notes that although the term WMD is now common, during the Cold War there was a very real threat of civilization ending in nuclear war as strategy and technology rapidly advanced competing arsenals of mass destruction. The chilling photographs provide a glimpse into the dawn of the atomic age and subsequent arms race.
This document discusses weapons of mass destruction, focusing on nuclear weapons and biological weapons. It provides details on the types of nuclear weapons, countries that possess them, and historical nuclear accidents and incidents. It also outlines biological warfare agents, countries that possess biological weapons, and methods of delivery. Examples are given of past uses of biological weapons, including by Imperial Japan during WWII. The large-scale impacts of potential uses of biological weapons are also noted.
The Cold War began in 1945 after World War II and lasted until 1991. It was a period of intense rivalry and hostility between the United States and the Soviet Union, who emerged as the two dominant superpowers after WWII. Both nations increased military spending and built up nuclear arsenals, risking global destruction through nuclear war. The conflict included numerous proxy wars around the world and heightened tensions, such as the Cuban Missile Crisis that brought the world close to nuclear war. In the late 1980s, reforms in the Soviet Union under Gorbachev led to the fall of the Berlin Wall and the eventual dissolution of the Soviet Union, bringing an end to the over 40-year long Cold War.
The document provides background information on the Cuban Missile Crisis through a series of flashcards. It explains that prior to Castro, Cuba was ruled by the corrupt Batista who was supported by the US. Castro introduced reforms but this concerned the US and tensions grew. The failed Bay of Pigs invasion pushed Cuba closer to the USSR. In 1962, US spy planes discovered Soviet missile sites in Cuba, escalating the crisis. JFK imposed a naval blockade and negotiated with Khrushchev to remove the missiles in exchange for promises not to invade Cuba. Both sides gained concessions but the world avoided nuclear war.
The document summarizes key events during the Kennedy-Khrushchev era from 1959-1964, a period of increased tensions between the US and Soviet Union during the Cold War. Some of the major events discussed include the Soviet launch of Sputnik, escalating conflict in Cuba under Castro's leadership, the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, construction of the Berlin Wall, the Cuban Missile Crisis that brought the two countries close to nuclear war, and increasing US involvement in Vietnam. The document provides historical context surrounding these pivotal moments between the two superpowers.
Unit #4 Nuclear Proliferation Student VersionNick Allgyer
The document summarizes the key events of the Cold War nuclear arms race between the United States and Soviet Union. It began after WWII when the US created the first atomic bomb and used it against Japan. The Soviets tested their first bomb in 1949, starting a nuclear arms competition. Both countries developed more powerful hydrogen bombs and delivery systems like ICBMs throughout the 1950s and 60s. Arms control treaties in the late Cold War aimed to limit nuclear stockpiles and curb proliferation.
The document discusses the methods used by the United States to contain communism during the Cold War. It describes how the Cold War began in Europe and expanded to Asia and other parts of the world. The US and Soviet Union engaged in proxy conflicts and competed for influence over newly independent nations. This competition eventually led to a dangerous nuclear arms race between the two superpowers, with both sides developing powerful new weapons like hydrogen bombs and missiles. The strategy of deterrence, also called Mutual Assured Destruction, emerged to describe the policy of maintaining a balance of nuclear terror.
The United States dropped two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, killing over 120,000 people. This remains the only use of nuclear weapons in warfare to date. Japan refused to surrender after facing firebombing and the Allied demand for unconditional surrender. In response, the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima on August 6 and Nagasaki on August 9. Japan surrendered on August 15, ending World War II.
Cuban missile crisis Daniel Ortiz/Felipe Jimeno/Andres Felipe MejiaSocialStudiesCampestre
In October 1962, the U.S. discovered that the Soviet Union was secretly constructing nuclear missile bases in Cuba, just over 90 miles from Florida. This led to a 13-day standoff known as the Cuban Missile Crisis. President Kennedy instituted a blockade around Cuba and demanded the Soviets remove the missiles. After tense negotiations, the Soviets agreed to dismantle the Cuban missile bases in exchange for the U.S. promising not to invade Cuba and agreeing to remove its own missiles from Turkey. The crisis ended, but it brought the world dangerously close to nuclear war.
The document provides an overview of the Cold War between the United States and Soviet Union from 1945 to 1991. It discusses key events and policies that defined the escalating tensions and arms race between the two superpowers, including Winston Churchill's "Iron Curtain" speech in 1946 marking the beginning of the Cold War; the Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan establishing policies of containment and economic assistance for democratic nations; the formation of NATO in 1949; the Korean War from 1950 to 1953; McCarthyism and the Second Red Scare in the 1950s; and the Eisenhower administration's policies towards the Cold War in the 1950s.
The events of the Cold War including the civilian "Duck and Cover", propaganda film and the many books and movies about the Cold War. Discussion of Nuclear Arms Race and Nuclear Treaties and current status of Nuclear Weapons Stockpiles. Lists of the Nuclear Tests and the damages an Atomic Bomb can cause.
Adjunct Professor Joe Boisvert
The document discusses the nuclear arms race between the United States and Soviet Union from the late 1940s through the 1980s. It describes how both nations engaged in an escalating arms buildup, developing new weapons like ICBMs, SLBMs, and MIRVs. It also discusses key events and agreements that shaped the arms race, such as the Soviet testing of nuclear weapons in 1949, the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, and arms limitation treaties like SALT I and SALT II. Throughout this period, both superpowers pursued policies of deterrence based on the threat of mutually assured destruction.
Nuclear deterrence is a military strategy where the threat of nuclear retaliation is used to prevent aggression. During the Cold War, the doctrine of mutually assured destruction kept the US and USSR from attacking each other due to the threat of massive nuclear retaliation that could annihilate the attacker. The development of intercontinental ballistic missiles and second strike capabilities strengthened deterrence by ensuring both sides could launch a devastating response even after a first strike. The goal of nuclear deterrence is to intimidate enemies through the threat of unacceptable damage so they do not initiate conflict in the first place.
The Cuban Missile Crisis occurred in October 1962 and brought the United States and Soviet Union closest to nuclear war. The Soviet Union had placed nuclear missiles in Cuba, which were detected by U.S. intelligence. In response, the U.S. established a naval blockade of Cuba. After 13 days of heightened tensions, the Soviet Union agreed to remove the missiles from Cuba in exchange for the U.S. removing missiles from Turkey and pledging not to invade Cuba. The crisis highlighted the danger of nuclear war and led to the creation of a direct communication link between the U.S. and Soviet leaders.
The Manhattan Project was the code name for the Allied military operation during World War II to develop the first atomic bombs. This included the first nuclear bomb test in July 1945, shown in the provided image. Two months later, the United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, marking the beginning of the Atomic Age. The immense destruction caused by the bombs far exceeded expectations and brought the world into a new era defined by nuclear weapons and the threat of their use.
The Cold War expanded globally through the 1950s as tensions rose between the United States and Soviet Union. They engaged in an arms race, stockpiling nuclear weapons on a massive scale in a strategy of mutually assured destruction. President Eisenhower pursued containment of communism through nuclear deterrence rather than conventional forces. Conflicts erupted in areas like Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and were met with new policies like massive retaliation and the Eisenhower Doctrine. The space race began as the Soviets launched Sputnik, worrying Americans and leading to the creation of NASA.
The nuclear arms race was a competition for military supremacy through nuclear weaponry between the United States and Soviet Union and their respective allies during the Cold War. The arms race was fueled by tensions growing out of World War 2 and differing political ideologies. Both nations invested heavily in developing the most advanced nuclear weapons and delivery systems, including gravity bombs, missiles, and eventually hydrogen bombs. This escalation was driven by fears of losing military dominance and led to both nations amassing tens of thousands of nuclear warheads. The arms race had enormous economic and political costs and raised global tensions until nuclear weapons treaties and the concept of mutually assured destruction helped limit further proliferation.
The Cold War arms race between the United States and Soviet Union intensified in the 1950s. Both sides raced to develop more powerful nuclear weapons, with each country building stockpiles large enough to destroy the other many times over in the hope that this policy of mutually assured destruction would deter nuclear war. Meanwhile, tensions also rose in space as the Soviets launched Sputnik I, the first artificial satellite, sparking fears of Soviet dominance and prompting increased American efforts to catch up in the space race through the creation of NASA.
The document provides information about the Cold War and Space Race between the United States and Soviet Union. It includes slides summarizing key events like the development of nuclear weapons by both countries leading to a nuclear arms race and increased tensions. It also discusses early space missions by both countries including Sputnik 1, Luna 2, Yuri Gagarin becoming the first person in space, and Alan Shepard being the first American in space. The document lists accomplishments by both countries in an effort to one-up each other technologically and militarily during the Cold War era.
This document provides background on the development of nuclear weapons and their impact on politics from WWII through the present. It discusses key events like the Manhattan Project, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that ended WWII, the US nuclear monopoly ending with the Soviet test of a bomb in 1949 fueling the Cold War arms race, and the development of the hydrogen bomb in 1953. The document argues that while nuclear threats once instilled fear, the most critical current threat is smaller nuclear bombs acquired by terrorist groups, requiring monitoring of proliferation.
This set of slides combines Parts 2 & 3 of the Cuban Missile Crisis (Part 1 was already sent as a video). Part 2 focuses on the escalation of tensions that led to the Cuban Missile Crisis and how it brought the world close to nuclear war. Part 3 focuses on the resolution of the conflict and how it impacted the parties involved.
The document summarizes key events and developments during the early Cold War period between the United States and Soviet Union, including the nuclear arms race, brinkmanship foreign policy, crises like the Suez Crisis, and the space race. It discusses how the Soviet Union gaining nuclear weapons and launching Sputnik created fear and a drive for technological superiority in the US, leading to the creation of organizations like NASA and investments in education and defense. The period was characterized by an escalating arms race between the two superpowers and proxy conflicts and influence operations around the world.
The Cold War began in 1945 after WWII and lasted until 1991. It was a period of geopolitical tension and military buildup between the United States and its capitalist allies and the Soviet Union and its communist allies. Though direct military conflict was avoided, the two superpowers engaged in espionage, propaganda, arms races, and proxy wars. The ideological conflict that fueled the Cold War was between communism and democracy. Key events included the Berlin Airlift, nuclear arms buildup, space race, Cuban Missile Crisis, and fall of the Berlin Wall. The Cold War ended as reform policies in the USSR led Eastern Bloc countries to abandon communism in 1989-1991.
The Cold War began in 1945 after WWII and lasted until 1991. It was a period of geopolitical tension and military buildup between the United States and its capitalist allies and the Soviet Union and its communist allies. Though direct military conflict was avoided, the two superpowers engaged in espionage, propaganda, arms races, and proxy wars. Canada was pulled closer to the U.S. through alliances like NORAD but maintained some independence in foreign policy decisions. The threat of nuclear war loomed large throughout the Cold War as both sides stockpiled weapons.
3b - Lesson 3 - Introduction to the Cold War.pptxcudleynoodles
The Cold War was an ideological struggle between capitalist West led by the US and communist East led by the Soviet Union. After WWII, Europe was divided with Western countries allied with the US and Eastern European countries becoming Soviet satellite states. The two superpowers competed for global influence through military alliances like NATO and the Warsaw Pact, proxy wars, and an arms and space race highlighted by the US moon landing. The Cuban Missile Crisis brought the world closest to nuclear war and highlighted tensions between the US and Soviet Union vying to become dominant global superpowers.
The Cold War emerged after World War II and divided the world into capitalist and communist blocs led by the United States and Soviet Union respectively. As the two superpowers stockpiled nuclear weapons without direct conflict, tensions were high. Canada played a middle power role by mediating international issues and sharing intelligence through espionage. The threat of mutually assured destruction kept nuclear weapons from being used but consumed resources in an arms race until tensions eased with the Cold War's end in the late 1980s.
The document summarizes the nuclear arms race between the United States and Soviet Union during the Cold War in four phases:
1) From 1945-1955, the US initially had a nuclear monopoly but the Soviets tested their first atomic bomb in 1949, beginning a nuclear arms escalation as both sides developed thermonuclear weapons.
2) From 1955-1965, both powers acquired intercontinental ballistic missiles, heightening tensions as the Soviets exaggerated their capabilities, though the US worked to counter any missile gap.
3) From the mid-1960s to the late 1970s, formal agreements sought to create stability amid intensifying arms development.
4) In the 1980s, increased competition was seen in
The Manhattan Project was a secret US research program during World War II to develop the first atomic bombs. It had three main sites for producing plutonium and enriched uranium: Hanford, Washington; Oak Ridge, Tennessee; and Oak Ridge. On January 16, 1943, General Groves selected Hanford as the site for plutonium production. The Manhattan Project produced the atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, helping to end World War II.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
2. Initial Impact
• The bombing of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki
made it abundantly
clear that the nature of
warfare had changed
dramatically.
• Now the question was:
“To what extend could
nuclear weapons be
applied directly to
diplomatic influence.”
3. Initial Impact
• While Politicians drooled
over the possibilities,
many scientists
recommended
international control over
the weapons to prevent
the suicidal possibilities
the new technology
presented – and to
forestall a new and
cripplingly expensive
arms race.
4. Initial Impact
• Along with the
destructive capability of
this new technology,
there was also an
apparent infinite
potential for energy
generation.
• The matter of control
rested on more than
just military interests.
5. Initial Impact
• The British and Canadians, co-
developers of the bomb with
the Americans, concluded that
the destructive potential of
the new weapon would soon
spiral.
• The technology would also
spread. It could not be kept
secret. Missile technology was
developing quickly.
• Many experts predicted that
the Soviets would have atomic
bombs of their own in 4 or 5
years.
6. Initial Impact
• This estimation brought
calls for international
sharing and control of
atomic technology.
• Nothing would be lost
in the long run and here
would be excellent
short term rewards for
such magnanimity.
7. Initial Impact
• Americans were divided
on the issue:
– One group favoured
international control as
expressed in the Acheson-
Lilienthal proposal.
– The opposing side won
out, as became clear after
Truman appointed Bernard
Baruch to the UN’s Atomic
Energy Commission.
8. Initial Impact
• The Baruch Plan called for international control international management
of the raw materials and inspection by international agencies of the
facilities.
• It also provided for no vetoes in the UN of these policies and majority rule
in decision making.
• The Atomic Development Authority would establish plants, not national
governments.
• This was unacceptable to the Soviets since it would not be able to develop
facilities where they felt power requirements demanded them.
• The Soviets countered by demanding the destruction of all atomic bombs,
the cessation of production and an international agreement not to produce
them.
• Neither side would moderate their position, resulting in deadlock.
• Canadian representative Andy McNaughton felt that the American
programme was insincere “from start to finish.”
• There would be no international sharing whatsoever. Everyone was
excluded by the Americans who sought to exploit their atomic monopoly.
9. Initial Impact
• The US atomic monopoly was
countered by large standing
forces on the part of the
Soviets.
• This became institutionalized
in Soviet military thinking.
• In the short run this would
hold American interests in
Western Europe hostage if the
threat of Soviet attack was
credible. When the Soviets
gained their own atomic
bombs, this threat made up
for the American advantage in
delivery systems.
• Large forces on the ground
also helped to maintain
satellite nation loyalty.
10. Doctrine of Massive Retaliation
• While they had an atomic
monopoly and even after
this, the threat of nuclear
war was employed by the
Americans several times.
• This became increasingly
dangerous as the Soviets
developed weapons and
delivery systems of their
own.
11. Doctrine of Massive Retaliation
• Gwynne Dyer notes:
– President Eisenhower’s willingness to
use nuclear weapons, if necessary, to
break the stalemate in the Korean
truce talks in 1953, like Churchill’s
expressed willingness to use poison
gas (and anthrax germ warfare
bombs) on Germany in 1944, was
almost natural in an era already
inured to the idea of total war. The
fact that neither Churchill or
Eisenhower had to fear retaliation in
kind also made it easier for them to
think in such terms. The doctrine was
eventually formalized under the title
of “massive retaliation:” if the
Russians attacked in Europe, there
would be no shilly-shallying with
conventionally equipped armies. The
bombers of US Strategic Air
Command would simply destroy the
Soviet Union with nuclear weapons.
12. Doctrine of Massive Retaliation
• This policy was most
credible from 1945-49,
but still remained US
policy well into the 1950s,
with vestiges still present
as late as during the 1962
Cuban Missile Crisis.
• The massive Soviet
nuclear build-up of the
1960s rendered it
inconceivable.
13. Mutual Assured Destruction
• With Americas superiority lost,
nuclear planners needed other
justifications for continuing to
produce new and better
bombs in an era when it was
clear that nuclear war meant
destruction of civilization in at
least the northern
hemisphere.
• The new idea was to ensure
that a credible nuclear
deterrence was maintained.
That one could have enough
weapons survive a first strike
to be able to retaliate
effectively.
14. Mutual Assured Destruction
• The US came to rely on
what they termed the triad
to ensure a second strike
capability.
• This consisted of the air
force’s strategic bombers,
land based missiles, and
submarine launch missiles
of the navy. In a military
world of competing
equipment demands, this
spread atomic spending
around.
15. Mutual Assured Destruction
• The Soviets tended to
put most of their
effort into their land-
based missiles at first.
• Soviet aircraft were
not thought capable
of effective long-
range delivery.
• A second strike
capability from
submarine launched
missiles was felt
sufficient.
16. Mutual Assured Destruction
• In theory the possession
of relatively small
numbers of weapons
makes war between
nuclear states
unthinkable.
• Interestingly, neither
superpower extended this
logic to others, opposing
other nations adopting a
similar strategy to
prevent war.
17. Civil Defence
• The idea of putting in
place defensive measures
for the civilian population
in case of nuclear attacks
runs counter to the
notion of mutual assured
destruction.
• Nonetheless, most
countries did something.
– Efforts everywhere were
more window-dressing
than real.
– The cost of effective
defence measures was
simply too great.
18. Civil Defence
• In North America, efforts
were almost comic.
– The “Duck and Cover” film
discussed what to do in a
nuclear attack.
– A siren in Victoria Park was
set up to warn of nuclear
attack – though there is
nothing to be done about it.
– Some downtown buildings
had areas designated as
“shelters” – but basic survival
provisions were generally not
stored.
– Leaders and financial records
were often provided for, but
populations were not
19. Flexible Response
• US Defence Secretary Robert
MacNamara felt that only
about 200 or so “invulnerable”
missiles guaranteed western
nuclear security. Maintaining
submarine launch weapons
alone could do this.
• Others in the triad now had to
justify their spending.
• The result was the
development of plans to fight
and even win a “limited
nuclear war.”
• Allied to the generals in
formulating these plans were
the suppliers of weapon
systems.
20. Flexible Response
• In his 1961 farewell
speech, President
Eisenhower warned of
the influence of the
“military industrial
complex.”
• In the Soviet Union,
Khruschev also warned
of the power of what he
termed the “metal
eaters’ alliance.”
21. Flexible Response
• Planners now thought that
because the cost of all-out
nuclear war was so high, perhaps
both sides would shrink from
using such weapons against
enemy populations – since a
similar fate would befall their
own population.
• They suggested a counter-force
strategy, targeting military targets
and dropping counter-value
targets (cities).
• The Doctrine of mutual assured
destruction was dropped.
• New and more accurate weapon
systems made this strategy
feasible; MacNamara bought it.
22. Flexible Response
• Justification for nuclear
build-ups were on two
grounds:
– Growth in enemy stockpiles
required balanced growth to
ensure parity and that
refinement of delivery
systems was needed to make
the threat of retaliation
credible.
– A variety of nuclear weapon
systems were now required
to ensure an ability to
respond to any situation –
from a local battlefield
exchange to a full holocaust
nuclear exchange .
23. Flexible Responjse
• When “flexibility” is stressed, the
argument that there are only a limited
number of realistic targets of all kinds
and that the superpowers have
enough weapons to destroy them all
and turn the rubble a couple of more
times no longer holds.
• The numbers of weapons grow out of
all proportion to the number of
targets.
• Furthermore, the deployment of more
intermediate range weapons and
cruise missiles added a further
destabilizing element. For instance,
the warning time to the Soviets for a
Pershing II missile heading from W.
Europe to Moscow is only 6 minutes
(An ICBM from the USA takes 30).
What kind of rational decision making
can take place in this time frame?
24. Flexible Response
• Planning was increasingly
dominated by technical issues,
rather than consideration of
possible end results.
• Daniel Ellsberg, former
American strategic planner
and the source of the leaked
Pentagon Papers described
this kind of work as being
divorced from reality. Dealing
with numbers on paper, the
planners chart mega-death in
the same way that engineers
modify car designs. Ellsberg
resigned when he thought
about the implications of his
work and leaked information
to the press.
25. The Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM) 1972
• The Nixon and
Brezhnev governments
recognized that leaps
in defensive
technologies might
destabilize the Cold
War balance as much
as offensive advances.
• In 1972 the US and
USSR agreed to limit
ABM systems used to
defend areas against
missile attacks – thus
ensuring that
deterrence could
operate.
26. Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI)
• Americans constantly
sought technological
solutions to the
problems confronting
them.
• The notion of
technically solving
America’s nuclear
vulnerability was
particularly appealing.
27. Strategic Defence Initiative (1980s
Reagan’s America)
• The official line was that a
defensive shield should
be built to prevent the
penetration of enemy
missiles.
• This is a difficult thing to
argue against.
• However, a shield is also a
weapon. Invulnerability
gives the ability to launch
a first strike without fear
of retaliation, making war
more, not less, likely.
28. Strategic Defence Initiative
• Most independent scientists
(those not employed by
defence contractors) feel that
complete protection is
impossible. Even 95%
reliability allows unacceptable
casualties – enough to destroy
the fabric of American society.
• Some believe that the
technical problems involved in
ultra-sophisticated technology,
using lasers, particle beam
weapons, electromagnetic
cannons and the incredible
computing power needed to
coordinate it all makes the
entire project unfeasible.
29. Strategic Defence Initiative
• Not the least of the problems
associated with anti-nuclear
defence work is the difficulty
in actually testing it.
• No above ground testing of
nuclear explosions have
happened since the early
1960s.
• We have no idea of the effect
of even a small number of
exploding weapons in the
atmosphere.
30. Strategic Defence Initiative
• SDI comes with a very high
price tag.
• Critics point to relatively
cheap ways of counter-
acting it.
– Massive use of decoys could
overwhelm command and
control.
– Preliminary strikes against
multi-billion dollar space
platforms would obviously
precede any attack.
– Sailing weapons into enemy
ports in freighters easily
circumvents space based
defence measures.
31. Nuclear Proliferation
• Even when the USA had a
nuclear monopoly, it was
clear that it could not last.
• Next to join the nuclear club
was the USSR in 1949.
• They were followed by the
British, French and Chinese.
• All justifications mirrored
earlier claims that the
weapons were purely
defensive and intended to
promote peace.
32. Nuclear Proliferation
• This club hoped to remain exclusive. It didn’t.
• Even countries that signed the 1968 Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty sought the
technology.
• Israeli technician Mordechai Vanunu blew the
whistle on his country’s successful
programme.
• India exploded a bomb in the 1970s – and
Pakistan eventually followed suit.
• South Africa and Iraq nearly acquired
weapons.
• Canada, Japan, Argentina, Iran and Brazil can
do so.
• North Korea is certainly a member of the
nuclear club.
• Even organizations could build simple
weapons if they had fissionable material. ABC
television hired to Physics Grad Student to
build a mock up with fake material, using plans
available on the Internet.
33. Nuclear Proliferation
• Even delivery systems, from
fighter-bombers to missiles
are available in the
international market place.
Despite an embargo, Iraq
was able to build missile
guidance systems from
Playstation components.
• Potential nuclear powers
wonder why some countries
seem to be allowed them
and others not.
34. Arms Limitation Agreements
• The Cuban Missile Crisis
alerted the world to the
danger of all-out conflict.
• The potential for accidental
war was too high; both powers
sought to diffuse the problem.
• The US leaked its fail-safe
technology to the Soviets and
both sides took the installation
of a telephone hotline
between the two national
leaders very seriously.
• The threat of war between the
super-powers remained
dangerously high.
35. Arms Limitation Agreements
• The first important treaty
was signed in 1963 – the
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty,
which ended above-
ground testing of nuclear
weapons.
• China and France did not
sign at the time – but
they too took to
underground testing only.
36. Arms Limitation Agreements
• After the Non-Proliferation
Treaty (negotiated in 1968 and
put into force in 1970) came
the Strategic Arms Limitation
Talks (SALT 1) in 1969.
• Both sides agreed to limit the
number of launchers they
would employ.
• Though a good first step,
technology outran diplomacy.
Soon new multiple-warhead
weapons arrived – as well as
mobile launch systems and
cruise missiles – which
rendered the agreement
practically useless.
37. Arms Limitation Agreements
• SALT 1 was signed in
Moscow in 1972 and
extended in Vladivostok in
1975.
• In 1979 President Carter
and Leonid Brezhnev came
to a more comprehensive
agreement, SALT 2, in
Vienna.
• Soviet involvement in
Afghanistan led to the killing
of the deal by new
President Ronald Reagan
and his conservative Senate
supporters.
38. Arms Limitation Agreements
• Even the cooling of great
power relations did not
stop other talks.
• In 1982 the Strategic Arms
Reduction Talks (START)
began.
• Though there was little
initial progress, a
breakthrough was
eventually reached when
Mikhail Gorbachev
established a trusting
relationship with the
American President.
39. Nuclear Winter
• Arms talks were difficult,
often bogging down over
minor points and evading
major ones.
• As we noted, technology
often outran diplomacy.
• In the end it was
technology that provided
a way out of the impasse.
• Progress came from a
seemingly unrelated field.
40. Nuclear Winter
• In 1971, scientists
examined meteorological
data from Mariner 9 s trip
to Mars.
• Dense dust clouds
frustrated them as they
sought to study the
planet.
• They concluded that
these long-lasting dust
storms significantly
lowered surface
temperatures.
41. Nuclear Winter
• Vulcanologists also
considered the effects of
volcanic ash and dust
spewed into earth’s
atmosphere.
• It was well known that
the 19th century eruption
of Krakatoa depressed
global temperatures.
Scientists wondered if
prehistoric extinctions
might not have been
generated by such a
catastrophe.
42. Nuclear Winter
• In 1982 other scientists considered the dust and smoke
effects of a potential nuclear war – in light of this
knowledge.
• They concluded that massive forest fires would be
ignited in such a conflict, sending hundreds of millions of
tons of smoke into the atmosphere that “would strongly
resist the penetration of sunlight to the earth’s surface.”
• The result would plunge the world into darkness for as
much as 6 months.
• A drop of 40 degrees centigrade was predicted in the
continental interiors,.
43. Nuclear Winter
• In 1983 a symposium of
40 scientists met to
further probe
possibilities.
• Carl Sagan and his
colleagues concluded
that fighting even a
limited nuclear war
could be suicidal – even
if one side was not
directly hit.
44. Nuclear Winter
• Their conclusions were
further test by a study of
the Soviet Academy of
Sciences.
• They felt that a war in which
5,000 megatons of weapons
were exploded (57% as
groundbursts over
hardened targets and 20%
as airbursts over cities)
could end most life on the
planet. Smaller conflicts
would also devastate the
world.
• Nuclear war on any but very
small scale, is, therefore,
suicidal.
45. Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces
Treaty
• In 1988 the US and USSR
signed the first treaty
banning an entire category
of weapons.
• Allowing only a tiny
response time, these
weapons had the world on
a hair-trigger.
• The elimination of Pershing
IIs showed that Reagan was
serious about dealing with
Gorbachev and that he
trusted the Soviet leader.
Statue at the UN in New York. St. George
Slaying the Dragon – made from Pershing
II missile parts.
46. The Current Situation
• Talks and more talks in
the 1980s brought some
progress.
• More important were
developments in the
Soviet Union, where
Gorbachev sought to fix
the systemic problems
plaguing the country.
• His playing down Cold
War tensions and his
valiant attempts to
modernize his country
vastly reduced the danger
of war.
47. The Current Situation
• In the end, it also brought
complete collapse in
1991.
• At first the Soviet collapse
seemed to make the
world more, not less
dangerous, as huge
stockpiles of weapons
were outside the Russian
Republic.
• Khazakhstan held many
ICBMs and the Ukraine
had a vast arsenal.
48. The Current Situation
• Fear of the Russians initially
complicated things, but
generous American aid
eventually greased a deal
ensuring the patriation of
old Soviet nuclear weapons
to Russia.
• The Ukraine became a
poster country for
voluntarily
decommissioning its large
nuclear arsenal (3rd largest
in the world) – the cost to
the US was estimated at
$630 million.
Soviet missile silo, now a Ukrainian museum
49. The Current Situation
• The US & Russia signed the Mutual Detargeting Treaty
(MDT) in 1994.
• They agreed to stop automatically targeting the other
country, assuming that it was an enemy.
50. The Current Situation
• As Russia looked inward,
sorting itself out in the post-
Soviet world – it looked as
though the Cold War threat
of nuclear annihilation was
gone.
• The post 9-11 world
brought new fears,
however. Governments
everywhere worry about
the unsecured and missing
fissionable material – that
rogue countries or terrorist
organizations might use.
51. The Current Situation
• Fear of “rogue states”
developing Nuclear
weapons and delivery
systems were huge
worries in the early 21st
century.
• North Korea clearly had
such weapons and they
possessed IRBMs and
were working on ICBMs –
though to this point they
have not had a successful
test.
52. Current Situation
• Iran’s nuclear
capability was another
concern – particularly
for the USA.
• The Iranians claim they
only want to generate
power.
• The US fears weapon
development is the
real agenda.
• There was talk of an
Israeli pre-emptive
strike against Iran – as
they had attacked
Iraq’s Osiris facility in
1981.
53. The Current Situation
• In July, 2010 Iran’s nuclear
facilities were crippled by a
computer virus.
• In what has been called a
“weaponized computer
virus”, Iran’s nuclear
programme was set back
several years.
• The source of the Stuxnet
Virus appears to be Israel’s
top secret Dimona Complex.
The developers appear to
be Israeli and American.
54. The Current Situation
• 2010 also saw international
cooperation between the
two main nuclear powers
as they went to Prague to
sign the New START
agreement -- a follow-up
agreement to the START
agreement, agreeing to cut
their weapons numbers by
1/3.
• It was finally ratified by the
US Senate on Dec. 30,
2010.
Obama & Medvedev After Signing New START
55. What Next?
• A Trump presidency presents more
questions than answers.
• The President has not demonstrated
much understanding of issues beyond his
narrow expertise in real-estate
development and he has shown no
understanding of diplomacy. His constant
tweeting in response to criticism is
bizarre and un-statesmanlike. Twitter is
an inappropriate forum for policy
pronouncements or musings on
relationships with foreign powers.
• More concerning is his distrust and
disregard of experts in most areas and his
not listening to even his closest
international allies.
56. What Next?
• There are still thousands of
nuclear weapons in the world
that pose existential risks to
the planet.
• Arms control and nuclear
proliferation are as important
now as during the Cold War.
• International conflicts are
inevitable, so nuanced
understanding of the world is
vital if we are to avoid
Armageddon.