5. Purpose of this session
Importance of Accreditation
Changes in reaccreditation process
How to change way of preparation
Existing System VS Smart System
Productive Approach
6. Old System of accreditation
Submissions of AQAR
Submission of Self Study Report
Peer Team Visit
7. New System of accreditation
Qualitative to quantitative evaluation
Extensive use of ICT
Drastic changes in :-
Number of questions
Size of report
Days of visit
8. New System of accreditation
70% Online and 30% on site evaluation
100% OFF SITE evaluation from fourth
cycle onwards.
Emphasis on Students participation and
alumni activities.
9. Revised Accreditation Process
Submission of IIQA (Institutional Information for
Quality Assessment) along with the Self Study
Report.
The IIQA will be acknowledged in next ten days.
The process of data Validation and Verification
(DVV) will be done in thirty days.
The result of DVV will be communicated to the
college in next ten days.
Conduct of online SSS (Student Satisfaction
Survey) as a part of DVV.
Peer Team Visit will be organised within 30 days
after the SSS.
10. Peer Team Visit
Depending on the size of the
organisation, 2 to 5 members will visit the
college.
NAAC will not pre disclose names of the
Peer Team Members.
No logistic arrangements are to be made
by the college.
12. Quality Indicator Framework (QIF)
1. Curricular Aspects
2. Teaching-Learning and Evaluation
3. Research, Innovations and Extension
4. Infrastructure and Learning Resources
5. Student Support and Progression
6. Governance, Leadership and Management
7. Institutional Values and Best Practices
13. Criterion I
Curricular Aspects
ā¢ Curriculum Design and Development
ā¢ Curriculum Planning and Implementation
ā¢ Academic Flexibility
ā¢ Curriculum Enrichment
ā¢ Feedback System
ā¢ Not Applicable to us
14. Criterion II
Teaching Learning and Evaluation
2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
2.3 Teaching-Learning Process
2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
15. Criterion III
Research, Innovations and Extension
3.1 Promotion of Research and Facilities
3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research
3.3 Innovation Ecosystem
3.4 Research Publications and Awards
3.5 Consultancy
3.6 Extension Activities
3.7 Collaboration
Not Applicable to us
Not Applicable to us
16. Criterion IV
Infrastructure and Learning Resources
4.1 Physical Facilities
4.2 Library as a Learning Resource
4.3 IT Infrastructure
4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
17. Criterion V
Student Support and Progression
5.1 Student Support
5.2 Student Progression
5.3 Student Participation and Activities
5.4 Alumni Engagement
18. Criterion VI
Governance, Leadership and Management
6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership
6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (IQAS)
19. Criterion VII
Institutional Values and Best Practices
ā¢ 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities
ā¢ 7.2 Best Practices
ā¢ 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
30. Previous Preparation System
Fire Brigade Approach
No fixation of individual responsibility
Lack of accountability mechanism
Absence of performance appraisal system
Lack of holistic Approach
Lack of Training
Lack of S.O.P.
31. Consequences
Few teachers were under extreme
pressure; while others just enjoyed.
Duplication of work.
Poor quality of report, almost every
criterion was rewritten.
Extended working hours for few.
Overall average performance
32. What Now?
College has done SWOT analysis of each teacher.
Complete operational autonomy.
Training.
360 Degree Performance Appraisal
Close periodical review
Helpline
Three Tier System
35. Advantages
Zeroing down of conflicts
Congenial environment for all
More Scope for creativity
Better teamwork performance
Better trust and harmony
Win win situation
A well performing team will continue their work for next cycles too.
36. Operational Framework
P.G.K. Mandal Representative
Principal
Coordinator Coordinator
IQAC Accreditation Cell
Criterion Counselor
Criterion Head
Members of the Criterion
37. Report Submission Format
Name of the Criterion:-
Name of the teacher :-
Contact Number :-
Question Number :- Sub Question Number:-
Question:-_____________________________
Answer:- ______________________________
Do you think, the answer is satisfactory ?
Yes / No
If No, Suggest addition with reasons:-
Proposed activities for addition :-
Signature of the teacher:-
38. Proposed Strategy
Particulars Time Span
Teachers will finalize their team, team members and
convener
8 days
Approval to the teams by the college 3 days
Analysis of the criterion by respective teams 8 Days
Team will distribute questions among themselves 4 days
Members will collect data and prepare first draft of answers 7 days
Presentation of answers by convener and members and
detailed discussion (Corrections will be suggested)
7 days
Presentation of criterion by the convener before the
management of the PGKM
7 days
Final approval and report writing --
39. Some Tips for effective performance
Please focus on your OWN work.
Extend full cooperation to authorities
Observe deadlines.
Avoid Procrastination
40. Some Tips for effective performance
Lets take it as a prepaid exercise.
Be alert, as individual performance is going to be
assessed.
Respect your team members, conveners,
criterion counselor, they are there for a reason.
Have patience.
Be Proactive.