The Chicago School of Professional Psychology introduces their National Center for Academic and Dissertation Excellence and its services to dissertators.
This document discusses academic honesty and dishonesty. It outlines six values that define academic honesty: honesty, trust, fairness, respect, courage, and responsibility. Academic dishonesty includes plagiarism, unauthorized communication during assessments, misrepresenting accomplishments, and more. The document then discusses reasons why students may cheat or become dishonest and signs that could indicate cheating or plagiarism occurring. It provides strategies for preventing cheating and plagiarism, such as reducing pressures, ensuring test and assignment integrity, and making expectations clear. The document concludes with expert advice on how to avoid enabling cheating.
This document discusses the library's efforts to rationalize referencing policies and practices at the University of Leeds. It found inconsistencies in referencing styles used across schools and modules, confusing students. The library pushed for a new policy requiring each school to select a single style. It developed standardized referencing guides for the main styles used. Surveys found some improvement but also ongoing issues with awareness, compliance and tutor expectations. The library plans to further promote its supports and make minor updates to guides to improve the student experience with referencing. It recommends schools better implement the policy through introductions, workshops and explicit marking criteria.
2016 ACT test information - Riverside High Schooldayna_durbin
The document provides information about the ACT test, including what it measures, the subtests it contains, how it is scored, and how students can prepare. It notes that the ACT is a college admissions test that measures skills needed for the first year of college in English, math, reading, science, and an optional writing section. Scores range from 1-36 for each subtest and are averaged for a composite score. The document recommends students attempt every question and lists local test dates and preparation resources available to students.
This document provides guidance for supervisors of Extended Essays. It discusses recent changes to the Extended Essay including removing the abstract, reducing assessment criteria to 5, and discouraging appendices. Supervisors must ensure students understand requirements and discuss topics and research questions. Supervisors are expected to provide guidance during the research, writing, and reflection stages. Common problems include topics being too broad or data inaccessible. Supervisors must also be familiar with subject-specific requirements to avoid students focusing on narrative treatments in History or topics being too historical in Economics.
LIBER 2017: Eleanor Warren, PhD to professional: complementary perspectives i...Eleanor Warren
Parallel session 12. Paper 12.1 at LIBER 2017 (Patras, Greece), 5-7 July 2017
Discussion of PhD skills for jobs in research support roles in research libraries in the UK.
This document provides information about Dr. Lam Yat-fai's upcoming proposal defence for his DBA in Finance from City University of Hong Kong. It outlines the standard procedure for a proposal defence, including presenting an introduction, literature review, research framework, and methodology in a one hour time slot. Assessment criteria focus on problem statement, significance, research objectives/questions, literature review, framework, concepts/variables, and methodology. The document advises starting preparation early, focusing on academic rigor, and using practice presentations to improve. It also describes a mock defence at the upcoming residential workshop to help learning partners prepare.
This document discusses academic honesty and dishonesty. It outlines six values that define academic honesty: honesty, trust, fairness, respect, courage, and responsibility. Academic dishonesty includes plagiarism, unauthorized communication during assessments, misrepresenting accomplishments, and more. The document then discusses reasons why students may cheat or become dishonest and signs that could indicate cheating or plagiarism occurring. It provides strategies for preventing cheating and plagiarism, such as reducing pressures, ensuring test and assignment integrity, and making expectations clear. The document concludes with expert advice on how to avoid enabling cheating.
This document discusses the library's efforts to rationalize referencing policies and practices at the University of Leeds. It found inconsistencies in referencing styles used across schools and modules, confusing students. The library pushed for a new policy requiring each school to select a single style. It developed standardized referencing guides for the main styles used. Surveys found some improvement but also ongoing issues with awareness, compliance and tutor expectations. The library plans to further promote its supports and make minor updates to guides to improve the student experience with referencing. It recommends schools better implement the policy through introductions, workshops and explicit marking criteria.
2016 ACT test information - Riverside High Schooldayna_durbin
The document provides information about the ACT test, including what it measures, the subtests it contains, how it is scored, and how students can prepare. It notes that the ACT is a college admissions test that measures skills needed for the first year of college in English, math, reading, science, and an optional writing section. Scores range from 1-36 for each subtest and are averaged for a composite score. The document recommends students attempt every question and lists local test dates and preparation resources available to students.
This document provides guidance for supervisors of Extended Essays. It discusses recent changes to the Extended Essay including removing the abstract, reducing assessment criteria to 5, and discouraging appendices. Supervisors must ensure students understand requirements and discuss topics and research questions. Supervisors are expected to provide guidance during the research, writing, and reflection stages. Common problems include topics being too broad or data inaccessible. Supervisors must also be familiar with subject-specific requirements to avoid students focusing on narrative treatments in History or topics being too historical in Economics.
LIBER 2017: Eleanor Warren, PhD to professional: complementary perspectives i...Eleanor Warren
Parallel session 12. Paper 12.1 at LIBER 2017 (Patras, Greece), 5-7 July 2017
Discussion of PhD skills for jobs in research support roles in research libraries in the UK.
This document provides information about Dr. Lam Yat-fai's upcoming proposal defence for his DBA in Finance from City University of Hong Kong. It outlines the standard procedure for a proposal defence, including presenting an introduction, literature review, research framework, and methodology in a one hour time slot. Assessment criteria focus on problem statement, significance, research objectives/questions, literature review, framework, concepts/variables, and methodology. The document advises starting preparation early, focusing on academic rigor, and using practice presentations to improve. It also describes a mock defence at the upcoming residential workshop to help learning partners prepare.
The document summarizes a study on supporting engineering students in developing skills for communicating research plans. It discusses how earlier studies found students needed help with referencing, writing, and using library databases. The intervention provided students with an online resource to help narrow topics, embedded library and writing workshops, and peer review circles. Assessment results showed students significantly improved their research proposals after participating in the scaffolded academic skills program with support from the library, language, and academic specialists.
This document outlines the organizational structure and roles for the "Leadership & Flow" research program. It identifies the principal sponsor as the Quality of Life Research Center and the technology provider as ALEAS Simulations, Inc. It establishes an Advisory Board to recommend projects and a Managing Board based in Budapest to develop the research plan, evaluate proposals, and disseminate findings. It also lists 12 potential academic partners from business schools around the world to provide student participants and research support.
This document provides guidance for students on structuring and writing their Personal Project Report. It outlines the required sections of the report including front page, cover pages, table of contents, body, appendices, works cited, and bibliography. The body should address the four criteria of investigating, planning, taking action, and reflecting. Guidance is provided for writing each criterion section, including what to discuss and reflect on. Students are advised to select up to 10 relevant extracts from their process journal to include in the appendices as evidence. Other tips covered include using MLA format, including photos, and word count. The goal is to help students understand how to concisely summarize their project learning and process in their final report.
The document describes a module for an undergraduate biology course that aims to help students evaluate websites about global climate change. The module includes several activities: a brainstorming activity to engage students with climate change concepts, speakers from biology to discuss writing in science, a webquest where students explore websites on climate change, and evaluations to assess student learning. The module generally worked better than planned and achieved its goals of integrating knowledge across disciplines, constructing scientific arguments, and evaluating information sources, though it required more time and structure than anticipated. Factors like support from instructors, technology resources, and enthusiastic students contributed to the success of the module.
This document discusses plagiarism and the CrossCheck plagiarism detection service. It begins by defining plagiarism and explaining why plagiarism checks are important. It then provides details on how CrossCheck works, including that it checks submitted manuscripts against over 43 million articles in its database as well as internet content. The document cautions that plagiarism detection systems only find similar text and cannot detect other types of plagiarism like figures, ideas, or translations. It concludes by offering tips on how publishers can make best use of CrossCheck, such as promoting high standards and using it to educate authors and reviewers.
This document provides information to help students choose and apply to graduate school programs. It discusses factors to consider like faculty research interests and school rankings. Application requirements are outlined, including GRE scores, letters of recommendation, and statements of research experience. Tips are provided for the application process and timeline. Myths about graduate school are debunked. The second half introduces Individual Development Plans (IDPs), outlining their objectives of identifying skills to develop and research goals. Steps for creating an IDP are given, including self-assessment, writing the plan, implementation, and revising with a mentor.
Presentation from Referencing Reboot: Tools, Tech and Twinkle on 4 June 2014 (English Faculty, University of Cambridge).
Nicola works at the Open University.
This document provides guidance on planning for college. It discusses factors to consider in choosing a college, such as environment, opportunities, major, location, and size. It outlines different admissions deadlines and application requirements, including transcripts, standardized test scores, and essays. It offers tips for successful applications, such as proofreading essays, getting recommendations from core teachers, preparing for standardized tests, and scheduling campus visits. The overall document serves as a guide for high school students on navigating the college admissions process.
Learn more about peer review from the perspectives of an Editor-in-Chief, Online Publishing Systems Administrator, Associate Editor, Associate Editor Mentee and a Reviewer.
Family Connection is an online tool available through Naviance that provides students access to resources, communication tools, and collaborative college and career activities. It allows students to research colleges, compare college majors, create resumes, request transcripts and recommendations, explore careers and clusters, search for colleges that match their interests, and communicate with counselors. The StrengthsExplorer assessment helps students identify their strengths to guide career and college exploration.
This document provides guidance for high school students studying in the US on the college application timeline and process. It outlines the following key points:
1) The timeline for college applications spans from junior year through senior year, including taking standardized tests, researching colleges, visiting schools, writing essays, and submitting applications between September-January of senior year.
2) There are different types of US institutions including public/private universities and liberal arts colleges that vary in size, programs offered, and cost. Location, major, selectivity and other factors should be considered.
3) The application includes academic transcripts, test scores, essays, recommendations, and demonstrations of interests/activities. Admission decisions are based on grades, curriculum strength
The document discusses the requirements for the IB Extended Essay. It is a 4000 word research paper that students must complete to earn their IB diploma. The essay allows students to deeply explore a topic of their choice under the supervision of a teacher. It requires students to formulate a focused research question, conduct research to answer the question, and analyze their findings. Common pitfalls students encounter include topics that are too broad to cover adequately, lack of access to reliable sources, and plagiarism. The document provides tips for choosing a research topic, managing the research and writing process, and meeting the assessment criteria to produce a successful extended essay.
This document outlines an online workshop for assessing online courses at Howard University. The workshop objectives are to explain how online course assessment differs from face-to-face assessment, list the benefits of online assessment, access and evaluate an online course using the Quality Matters rubric, and introduce faculty to resources for training and course development. Key points covered include definitions of online course types, the importance of course design, and how the Quality Matters rubric can be used to guide a peer review process and ensure online course quality.
This document provides an overview of a lesson on evaluating, selecting, and weeding reference materials for a library collection. It defines reference materials and gives examples, explains the purpose of managing a reference collection, and outlines criteria for evaluating materials based on their scope, authority, currency, format, audience, and usefulness. Selection tools are also discussed. Finally, students are given an exercise to select updated coding reference materials using evaluation criteria and selection tools.
G10 Parent Meeting - PSAT Results, Option Choices & Intro to College Counsellingtcoffey2
The document summarizes a grade 10 parent meeting about PSAT results, option choices, and an introduction to college counseling. It discusses using PSAT results to help guide option choices and university applications. It also introduces a personalized college planning website called My College QuickStart that students can use to get a SAT study plan, search for colleges based on personality and major matches. Finally, it provides an overview of how certain option choices may influence applications to specific university programs or careers.
Studying Engineering and Architecture in the U.S. 2019EducationUSAEgypt
The document provides information to students considering engineering or architecture programs in the United States. It outlines the 5 steps to study in the US, benefits of these fields, factors to consider in choosing a program such as accreditation, degree levels and options, the application process, and resources for researching schools. Key aspects include emphasizing the importance of accreditation for professional licensure, varying admissions requirements for undergraduate and graduate programs, and financing options such as scholarships, fellowships and assistantships.
Teaching computer assisted reporting in 2015, Brant Houston #gijc15gijn
This document outlines concepts and skills for teaching computer-assisted reporting, including working with spreadsheets and databases, data cleaning, visualization, and skills like researching datasets, interviewing sources, and identifying stories. It recommends knowing students' existing skills, showing simple examples they can achieve, going slowly, and using relevant data and stories. Teaching involves coordination, new interfaces, and concepts, and good syllabi can be found through organizations like IJEC and IRE.
Plenary presentation at the Lancaster University Researcher Day on 26/09/2013 (http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/hr/development/courses/TeachingResearchRelated/Researcher-Day/index.html)
Writing the winning thesis or dissertation, a step by step guide. Slides have been prepared from the book of the same name authored by Randy L. Joyner, William A. Rouse and Allan A. Glatthorn.
1) Moodle quizzes and assignments can be used for online assessment. Quizzes provide immediate feedback while assignments allow for submitting work and receiving feedback.
2) There are benefits and drawbacks to different question types like multiple choice, short answer, and essays. Formative assessment with quizzes is recommended over summative assessment.
3) Peer assessment involves students grading each other's work but many prefer peer review where feedback is given without grades. Tools like Moodle workshop and adaptive comparative judgement can facilitate online peer review.
The document summarizes a study on supporting engineering students in developing skills for communicating research plans. It discusses how earlier studies found students needed help with referencing, writing, and using library databases. The intervention provided students with an online resource to help narrow topics, embedded library and writing workshops, and peer review circles. Assessment results showed students significantly improved their research proposals after participating in the scaffolded academic skills program with support from the library, language, and academic specialists.
This document outlines the organizational structure and roles for the "Leadership & Flow" research program. It identifies the principal sponsor as the Quality of Life Research Center and the technology provider as ALEAS Simulations, Inc. It establishes an Advisory Board to recommend projects and a Managing Board based in Budapest to develop the research plan, evaluate proposals, and disseminate findings. It also lists 12 potential academic partners from business schools around the world to provide student participants and research support.
This document provides guidance for students on structuring and writing their Personal Project Report. It outlines the required sections of the report including front page, cover pages, table of contents, body, appendices, works cited, and bibliography. The body should address the four criteria of investigating, planning, taking action, and reflecting. Guidance is provided for writing each criterion section, including what to discuss and reflect on. Students are advised to select up to 10 relevant extracts from their process journal to include in the appendices as evidence. Other tips covered include using MLA format, including photos, and word count. The goal is to help students understand how to concisely summarize their project learning and process in their final report.
The document describes a module for an undergraduate biology course that aims to help students evaluate websites about global climate change. The module includes several activities: a brainstorming activity to engage students with climate change concepts, speakers from biology to discuss writing in science, a webquest where students explore websites on climate change, and evaluations to assess student learning. The module generally worked better than planned and achieved its goals of integrating knowledge across disciplines, constructing scientific arguments, and evaluating information sources, though it required more time and structure than anticipated. Factors like support from instructors, technology resources, and enthusiastic students contributed to the success of the module.
This document discusses plagiarism and the CrossCheck plagiarism detection service. It begins by defining plagiarism and explaining why plagiarism checks are important. It then provides details on how CrossCheck works, including that it checks submitted manuscripts against over 43 million articles in its database as well as internet content. The document cautions that plagiarism detection systems only find similar text and cannot detect other types of plagiarism like figures, ideas, or translations. It concludes by offering tips on how publishers can make best use of CrossCheck, such as promoting high standards and using it to educate authors and reviewers.
This document provides information to help students choose and apply to graduate school programs. It discusses factors to consider like faculty research interests and school rankings. Application requirements are outlined, including GRE scores, letters of recommendation, and statements of research experience. Tips are provided for the application process and timeline. Myths about graduate school are debunked. The second half introduces Individual Development Plans (IDPs), outlining their objectives of identifying skills to develop and research goals. Steps for creating an IDP are given, including self-assessment, writing the plan, implementation, and revising with a mentor.
Presentation from Referencing Reboot: Tools, Tech and Twinkle on 4 June 2014 (English Faculty, University of Cambridge).
Nicola works at the Open University.
This document provides guidance on planning for college. It discusses factors to consider in choosing a college, such as environment, opportunities, major, location, and size. It outlines different admissions deadlines and application requirements, including transcripts, standardized test scores, and essays. It offers tips for successful applications, such as proofreading essays, getting recommendations from core teachers, preparing for standardized tests, and scheduling campus visits. The overall document serves as a guide for high school students on navigating the college admissions process.
Learn more about peer review from the perspectives of an Editor-in-Chief, Online Publishing Systems Administrator, Associate Editor, Associate Editor Mentee and a Reviewer.
Family Connection is an online tool available through Naviance that provides students access to resources, communication tools, and collaborative college and career activities. It allows students to research colleges, compare college majors, create resumes, request transcripts and recommendations, explore careers and clusters, search for colleges that match their interests, and communicate with counselors. The StrengthsExplorer assessment helps students identify their strengths to guide career and college exploration.
This document provides guidance for high school students studying in the US on the college application timeline and process. It outlines the following key points:
1) The timeline for college applications spans from junior year through senior year, including taking standardized tests, researching colleges, visiting schools, writing essays, and submitting applications between September-January of senior year.
2) There are different types of US institutions including public/private universities and liberal arts colleges that vary in size, programs offered, and cost. Location, major, selectivity and other factors should be considered.
3) The application includes academic transcripts, test scores, essays, recommendations, and demonstrations of interests/activities. Admission decisions are based on grades, curriculum strength
The document discusses the requirements for the IB Extended Essay. It is a 4000 word research paper that students must complete to earn their IB diploma. The essay allows students to deeply explore a topic of their choice under the supervision of a teacher. It requires students to formulate a focused research question, conduct research to answer the question, and analyze their findings. Common pitfalls students encounter include topics that are too broad to cover adequately, lack of access to reliable sources, and plagiarism. The document provides tips for choosing a research topic, managing the research and writing process, and meeting the assessment criteria to produce a successful extended essay.
This document outlines an online workshop for assessing online courses at Howard University. The workshop objectives are to explain how online course assessment differs from face-to-face assessment, list the benefits of online assessment, access and evaluate an online course using the Quality Matters rubric, and introduce faculty to resources for training and course development. Key points covered include definitions of online course types, the importance of course design, and how the Quality Matters rubric can be used to guide a peer review process and ensure online course quality.
This document provides an overview of a lesson on evaluating, selecting, and weeding reference materials for a library collection. It defines reference materials and gives examples, explains the purpose of managing a reference collection, and outlines criteria for evaluating materials based on their scope, authority, currency, format, audience, and usefulness. Selection tools are also discussed. Finally, students are given an exercise to select updated coding reference materials using evaluation criteria and selection tools.
G10 Parent Meeting - PSAT Results, Option Choices & Intro to College Counsellingtcoffey2
The document summarizes a grade 10 parent meeting about PSAT results, option choices, and an introduction to college counseling. It discusses using PSAT results to help guide option choices and university applications. It also introduces a personalized college planning website called My College QuickStart that students can use to get a SAT study plan, search for colleges based on personality and major matches. Finally, it provides an overview of how certain option choices may influence applications to specific university programs or careers.
Studying Engineering and Architecture in the U.S. 2019EducationUSAEgypt
The document provides information to students considering engineering or architecture programs in the United States. It outlines the 5 steps to study in the US, benefits of these fields, factors to consider in choosing a program such as accreditation, degree levels and options, the application process, and resources for researching schools. Key aspects include emphasizing the importance of accreditation for professional licensure, varying admissions requirements for undergraduate and graduate programs, and financing options such as scholarships, fellowships and assistantships.
Teaching computer assisted reporting in 2015, Brant Houston #gijc15gijn
This document outlines concepts and skills for teaching computer-assisted reporting, including working with spreadsheets and databases, data cleaning, visualization, and skills like researching datasets, interviewing sources, and identifying stories. It recommends knowing students' existing skills, showing simple examples they can achieve, going slowly, and using relevant data and stories. Teaching involves coordination, new interfaces, and concepts, and good syllabi can be found through organizations like IJEC and IRE.
Plenary presentation at the Lancaster University Researcher Day on 26/09/2013 (http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/hr/development/courses/TeachingResearchRelated/Researcher-Day/index.html)
Writing the winning thesis or dissertation, a step by step guide. Slides have been prepared from the book of the same name authored by Randy L. Joyner, William A. Rouse and Allan A. Glatthorn.
1) Moodle quizzes and assignments can be used for online assessment. Quizzes provide immediate feedback while assignments allow for submitting work and receiving feedback.
2) There are benefits and drawbacks to different question types like multiple choice, short answer, and essays. Formative assessment with quizzes is recommended over summative assessment.
3) Peer assessment involves students grading each other's work but many prefer peer review where feedback is given without grades. Tools like Moodle workshop and adaptive comparative judgement can facilitate online peer review.
Syllabus Material Development and Evaluation.pptxZeeshanLiaquat6
This document provides information about the Material Development and Evaluation course taught by Dr. Saeed Ahmad. It outlines the course objectives, which are to help students evaluate current materials design practices and provide guidelines for developing materials. The course covers topics like principles of materials development, adapting materials, and evaluation. It is assessed through assignments, presentations, quizzes and a midterm and final exam worth 30 and 50 marks respectively. Reading materials for the course include books on materials development, curriculum design and language teaching methodology. The document provides details on assignment topics, citation styles, group presentations and grading criteria.
This document summarizes a presentation on conducting literature reviews for research. It outlines the objectives of the session which are to evaluate the importance of literature reviews, identify different information sources, apply search techniques, and properly cite references. It then covers various topics related to literature reviews including defining the research problem, understanding the research process, planning literature searches, evaluating sources, structuring reviews, and using citation management tools. The presentation provides guidance on how to effectively find and analyze relevant research to support academic work.
Dr. John A. Hoehn gave a presentation on February 24, 2014 about completing a dissertation. The presentation covered the dissertation timeline and process, resources for each phase, and future topics like web surveys and netnography. It provided an overview of the learning goals, which included understanding the dissertation timeline and process, developing a master plan based on research questions, and learning digital tools for each phase. The presentation utilized an audience response system and branching presentation.
Rubrics- the Versatile and Practical Choice February 2016Eric Streeter
This document discusses the use of rubrics in academic advising at a university. It describes how rubrics were chosen as a versatile assessment tool, outlines the process of creating rubrics to evaluate student learning outcomes, and shares examples of rubrics used to assess whether students know their major and general education requirements and can select courses based on goals. Data from the rubrics show advisors' ratings of students in these areas. The document concludes by discussing using the assessment data to identify areas for improvement and make changes to advising practices.
Scaling the Academic Everest: A Comparative Study of Candidate and Doctoral P...Kalachova
Scaling the Academic Everest: A Comparative Study of Candidate and Doctoral Programs in the Ukraine and in the United States
Dr. John Johnson
18 March 2013
Kyiv, Ukraine
Thesis & viva student version 2013 [compatibility mode]VreckaScott
This document discusses expectations and concerns around thesis examinations and vivas. It provides guidance for students on preparing for their viva voce exam, including understanding the criteria examiners use to evaluate theses, common recommendations examiners can make, and what experienced examiners look for in successful candidates. The document also discusses the importance of skills, content knowledge, and conduct during the viva. Students share both positive and negative anticipations around their upcoming viva based on stories they have heard. The document provides many resources for students to help prepare and feel more confident going into their viva examination.
Preparing for Probation Review (2012) - Regine HampelOUmethods
The document provides information about the probation assessment process for PhD students at the Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology. It discusses the four main elements of probation assessment: 1) a project report, 2) a mini viva, 3) a summary of skills audit, and 4) an oral presentation. It also provides details about the content required for the project report, potential questions in the mini viva, and the three possible outcomes of the probation assessment: confirmation of PhD registration, requirement of further work, or termination of registration.
Doctoral Review of Literature Correspondence to Methodology: A general discus...DoctoralNet Limited
Part of the free ongoing series of conferences from DoctoralNet professors on Saturdays and Sundays, this set of slides covers the topic most likely to cause a person trouble at the proposal defense: the need for 1:1 correspondence between the review of literature and methodology.
A presentation given at the BCcampus Symposium on Scholarly Inquiry into Teaching and Learning, Nov. 2014. I discuss a pilot research project on gauging the impact of peer feedback on writing over the course of multiple peer feedback sessions.
This document discusses evaluation methods in higher education. It describes various tools and techniques used to evaluate students within a course, as well as tools to evaluate faculty, programs, and curricula. Some evaluation methods discussed for courses include project-based evaluation, research-based evaluation, higher-order thinking questions, quizzes, assignments, and video-based questions. Moodle is presented as an open-source learning management system that supports these evaluation tools and techniques. Faculty evaluation methods include self-monitoring, student feedback on teaching, and feedback from colleagues. Program evaluation involves collecting feedback from students, faculty, alumni, and industry partners.
Presentation for the Center for Teaching Excellence at Lansing Community College to share results from my sabbatical project, as well as practical applications for developing research assignments. Thanks to Maricopa Community College for sharing an <a>assignment planning checklist and sample assignment</a> that I adapted and used in the workshop.
Shifting to Specifications Grading: Two Design CasesVanessa Dennen
This document discusses specifications grading through two design cases - an undergraduate and graduate course. It describes what specifications grading is, how assignments are graded pass/fail against competencies, and how students are given tokens to revise work. For the undergraduate course, examples of skills checks, blog posts, and a PowerPoint assignment are provided, along with the token system. The graduate course overview outlines weekly discussions, papers, and a research bibliography assignment, along with its token system. Lessons learned focused on increased student confidence and engagement through clear expectations and more feedback than determining grades.
This document discusses instructional design models for online courses, including the ADDIE and ASSURE models. It outlines the steps in the ASSURE model: analyze learners and context, state learning objectives, select methods and materials, utilize the methods and materials, require learner participation, and evaluate and revise. Each step is described in detail, with tips provided on writing objectives, selecting appropriate technology, facilitating discussions, and evaluating effectiveness. The goal is to explain the process of designing high-quality online instruction.
This document discusses trends in student expectations for online courses, including demands for immediate feedback, availability of instructors 24/7, and informal communication styles. It also presents a rubric and checklist for evaluating online courses and instructors, focusing on navigation, content, assessment, instructor tracking, and appropriate technology use. Supervisors are encouraged to use the same rubrics to evaluate courses from a student perspective and allow access to teaching assistants to fully evaluate course development. Proper evaluation of online instruction is important to integrate into standard faculty evaluation systems.
This document provides an overview of how to conduct a literature review. It discusses key aspects of developing good research questions, operational definitions, and formulating hypotheses. It also reviews important components of the literature review chapter, including reviewing theories, types of hypotheses, and evaluating primary vs. secondary sources. Finally, it outlines steps for analyzing literature, such as distinguishing between assertions and evidence, identifying trends, and evaluating references for currency and coverage of the topic. The overall document serves as a guide for graduate students on how to effectively conduct a literature review.
The document provides information about the instructional materials adoption process in Texas. It explains that the State Board of Education issues proclamations to solicit new instructional materials and outlines the multi-year review and adoption cycle. Upcoming subject areas for review in 2014 include science, math, and technology. The document then discusses the role of district selection committees in reviewing samples and making recommendations to their local school boards. It provides examples of committee structures and outlines the selection and review criteria committees must consider when evaluating proposed instructional materials.
Similar to National Center for Academic & Dissertation Excellence (20)
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...NelTorrente
In this research, it concludes that while the readiness of teachers in Caloocan City to implement the MATATAG Curriculum is generally positive, targeted efforts in professional development, resource distribution, support networks, and comprehensive preparation can address the existing gaps and ensure successful curriculum implementation.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
2. Academic Success Programs
Writing
Assessment
Process
evaluation of
writing skills;
mandatory for all
new students;
online
Academic
Writing
Seminar
Individual
Academic
Support
Writing
Coaches
Dissertation, Thesis, and ARP Support
Writing eTutors
Dissertation
Writing Experts
• Consultations
(DWE)
Assistance with
IRB Applications
Time
Management
& Learning
Skills
Methodology
Experts
• Consultations
(ME)
Dissertation
Copy Editing
• Online
• Consultations
• Online
• On-ground &
online
• On-ground &
• Consultations
online
• On-ground &
online
• Post-defense
• Online
Advanced
Research Paper
Instruction
• Online
3.
4. • Your first of three formal reviews will occur at
any point during the drafting process for your
proposal.
• Some students will be required to submit to
Phase 1 within their first dissertation course,
other students will decide when to submit for
their first review. (Check with your chair if you
have questions!)
5. • The second of three formal reviews will take
place after your proposal has been approved
and before IRB approval.
• Dissertation Writing Experts and a
methodologist will be available to help
prepare a polished IRB application.
6. • The final review will take place just before you
submit your completed draft to your
committee for approval.
• A DWE will help to ensure clarity, proper
formatting, proper grammar, and that APA
style is adhered to.
• A ME will help to ensure the presentation of
data is as effective as possible.
7. DWE Role
• APA format
– Manuscript structure
– Unbiased style
– Citations, formatting, data presentation
• Literature review
– Linear prose
– Transitions
– Unbiased style
• Cohesion, logical flow, science
8. ME Role
• Helping students with the construction of their research
questions
• Discussing and suggesting appropriate research methods
• Reviewing IRB application materials before submission
• Providing consultation services on data collection options
• Providing consultation services on data analysis methods
• Trouble-shooting imperfections in data sets
• Reviewing students’ studies to ensure research questions
are addressed
9. Goal: High-quality scholarship
• Thorough review of current scientific
knowledge
• Clear presentation of hypotheses
• Selection of appropriate methods
• Clear presentation of results
• Valid conclusions
10. Summary
• Three full dissertation reviews by DWE
• Three methodology reviews by ME
• Continuous feedback
– Communication between student, dissertation
chair, and NCADE
– Quick/minor issues addressed as necessary
• Timely development of expertise