Potentials of Multi-Use Concepts
        within a MSP Process
                           Bela H. Buck
 International Marine Spatial Planning Public Symposium, Providence (RI)

Courtesy of the Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH)
Relatively small 
                                  N              PL    size of the area:
                                                 EST   Advantage or 
                                             S         Disadvantage?
                                                 RUS
                                   DK
                               German            LT
                                Bight
        GB                               D       LV
                         NL
                    B                            FIN
           F

© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Coastal Sea: 
                                         0‐12 nautical miles

                                         EEZ:
                                         12‐200 nautical miles 




       Courtesy of BSH 2012




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
North Sea



                                                  EEZ:            Baltic Sea
 EEZ:                                            Schleswig‐ 2
                                                  4,500 km
 28,600 km2                                       Holstein

                                                        Hamburg    Mecklenburg‐
                                                                   Vorpommern
                                                Bremen
                                         Lower‐Saxony




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
MSP at an early stages:
                                                                 (between 2001‐2006)

                                                                  Defining the actual state of 
                                                                   uses
          Shipping &           Pipelines, Cables, Mariculture,
       Military Features            Sediment, Platforms
                                                                  Ascertain priorities of 
                                                                   different uses

                                                                  Set priorities regarding 
                                                                   national and international 
     Nature Conservation            Offshore Wind Farms
                                                                   “dependencies”.


© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
What makes the decision about priorities in MSP for traditiional and 
“new” uses?        or             What are the prevailing public interests?
 Current national regulations and international legislations
 National and international contracts
 Economic interests
Is there a mandate and who is responsible?
 No/yes  →  not EU directly  →  but implementation of EU guidelines [Natura
  2000] as well as for the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP)
 Driver: New uses
 Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH) on behalf of and in close 
  co‐operation with Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs


© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
What are the tools?
 planning principle (guideline that needs to be particularly considered in the 
  decision process)
    priority areas (Vorranggebiete): reserved for a defined use, other 
      conflicting uses are excluded
    reservation areas (Vorbehaltsgebiete): defined use with priority in this 
      area
    suitable areas (Eignungsgebiete): defined use is excluded outside 
      designated areas




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Priority list (with regard to UNCLOS)
                                         High
                                          Safety and efficiency of shipping
                                          National and international 
                                           contracts [e.g. pipelines, cables]
                                          Protection of the marine 
                                           environment
                                          National/Alliance defence
                                         Others
                                          Resources
                                          Scientific research
                                          Wind farming


© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Are there potentials
                                         for more then one use?

                                         ‐ secondary use
                                         ‐ co‐use
                                         ‐ multi‐use
                                         ‐ multifunctional use




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Case example Wind Farming:
 Decision to be independent (regarding oil/gas/coal, nuclear power)
 Follow the Kyoto Protocol
 Follow the Renewable Energies Act of Germany
    35 % of electric power supply used in Germany by renewable 
      energy in 2020
    50 % in 2030
    25,000 MW by 2030 (6,000 – 8,000 turbines depending on MW‐
      class)
 Infrastructure‐Planning‐”Speed Up”‐Act


© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Construction of the
                                         Alpha Ventus wind
                                         farm in the EEZ 60
                                         km off the coast of
                                         Germany.


                                         5 MW class turbines:
                                         65 MWh∙day‐1∙windmill‐1
                                         8,000 €∙day‐1∙windmill‐1
                                         70% of companies SME




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Offshore wind
                                          In 2009, 2.8% of Europe’s total 
                                                     farm
                                           wind power was offshore.
                                                     development in
                                          192,000 people in the EU are 
                                                     the North Sea
                                           employed by the offshore wind 
                                           industry




  Courtesy of Arne Fredheim




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Multi-use ideas to maximize the          1. Ecology
benefit of an offshore area:                - Creating MPA‘s (nursery,
                                                sustainable fisheries…)
                                            - Set-up artificial reefs
                                         2. Tourism
                                         3. Additional energy resources
                                         4. Offshore Aquaculture
                                         5. Bio-Remediation /
                                              Bio-Extraction
                                         6. Use of fouling organisms

Image taken from Barry Costa‐Pierce


© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Motivation for Cooperation
                                         Next step is to add the entire 
                                         How is the economic value of 
                                         The progression of renewable 
                                         economic framework for the 
                                         a certain site offshore:
                                         energy worldwide recently has 
                                         wind energy side and combine 
                                         coincided with a similar 
                                         → only wind farming
                                         increase in marine 
                                         it with existing mussel 
                                         → in co‐use with another 
                                         aquaculture. See worldwide 
                                         aquaculture economics. 
                                         stakeholder
                                         stagnation of fisheries’ 
                                         → unclear ownership status 
                                         harvest, coupled with the 
                                         → Are there cost savings by 
                                         and insurance
                                         growth in aquaculture and 
                                         operating jointly. 
                                         wind energy over the last 30 
                                         in cooperation with Dr. Robert 
                                         years.
                                         Griffin at Stanford University 
                                         (California)

© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Research Platform FINO No. I
                                          Marine Facilities Ordinance
                                          Licensing procedure for offshore 
                                            wind farms
                                         → change regulation and licensing 
                                         procedure to include multi‐use 
                                         concepts as an obligation
                                         → multi‐use concepts will be 
                                         promoted (even if concepts are not 
                                         successful)


© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Meek, 1989




      © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Marine Facilities 
                                                  Ordinance

                                                  OSS‐Project forces 
                                                  wind farm operators 
                                                  to investigate in co‐
                                                  uses




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
                                         Buck et al. (2008), Helg. Mar. Research
Mussel cultivation designs




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012                      Buck (2007), Helg. Mar. Res.
                                         Buck et al. (2010), Aquac. Econom. Management
Seaweed cultivation

                                                          longlines
                                                          ladder
                                                          grid




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Bioextraction
“An environmental management strategy by which
nutrients are removed from an aquatic ecosystem through
the harvest of enhanced biological production, including
the aquaculture of suspension-feeding shellfish or algae”

Ecological Engineering
“Ecological Engineering is an emerging field that uses
ecological processes within natural or constructed
systems to achieve environmental goals”

Balanced Ecosystem Approach
“Fed aquaculture of finfish or shrimp with extractive
organic aquaculture of shellfish and extractive inorganic
aquaculture of seaweed (IMTA)”
                                                            SCIENCE VOL 323 20 FEB. 2009


© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
IMTA
                                 (Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture)

                                                                           extractive species
        extractive species                              1. defense line:
                                                        filter feeders
                           wind
                                                                   seaweed               mussels
                         farm with
                            fish

               fish/                                   2. defense line:          fish/
           wind turbine                                seaweeds              wind turbine
                                          different directions
                                              bidirectional
McVey & Buck (2008), WAS




 © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Parameters measured:

                                            Nutrients [NOX, P, Si, …]
                                            Salinity
                                            O2, CO2
                                            pH
                                            Chlorophyll
      FerryBox                              Attenuation/turbidity
                                            Fluorescence




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Consideration of
                                                          mechanical
                                                          loads on
                                                          grounding
                                                          constructions of
                                         longline, cage   windmills by
                                         or other         aquaculture
                                         constructions    devices




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
y


                                                                                                 N

                                                                                          NW                   NO




                                                                                    W                               O   x
                                                                                            



                                                                                          SW                   S0

                                                         S1 [N/mm²]
                                                                                                 S
                                                                      8 Windrichtungen
                                                                      8 Wellenanlaufrichtungen




                                         LC 5




                                                                                                     EF 4               EF 5   EF 6

Development of static models
Discussion of alternative
Generation of representative
(for 3-5 MWpoints ofclass)
connection turbine foundation
loads of wind energy                     LC 5            S1 [N/mm²]                                    S1 [N/mm²]




structure
installations

© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
                                                Buck et al. (2006), Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering
© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
                                         Buck & Krause (2010), Springer Encyclopedia
© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Bird’s-eye view of the “Nordergründe” offshore wind farm




                                           Buck et al. (2009) Aquacult. Econ. & Mgmt.
© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
                                                 Buck et al. (2003), Law International
                                           Buck et al. (2004), Ocean & Coastal Mgmt.
Break‐Even for Mussel Cultivation: Longline culture

 Breakeven price (assumption 10 kg/m)
 Above total variable costs                            0,14Euro
 Above total costs                                     0,52Euro

 Breakeven yield (assumption: 1 Euro/kg)
 Above total variable costs                            1,43kg
 Above total costs                                     5,17kg




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Consumption mussel with new  Consumption mussel with 
       NPV (IRR)             vessel and new land facility    existing capacity
                                 (5,667,073, 14.73%)       (9,622,937, 28.11%)
Price per kg mussel
  0.9 €                             3,369,576  (11.81)       7,325,440  (23.66)
  1.1 €                             7,964,570  (17.47)      11,920,433  (32.38)
Total cost increase
  + 5 % p.a.                         ‐1,899,456  (2.13)      2,056,407  (15.56)
Discount rates
  6 %                                    6,867,422              10,871,396
  8 %                                    4,611,108               8,522,651
  9 %                                    3,678,854               7,549,757



© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Bird’s-eye view of the “Cape Wind” offshore wind farm




                                            Buck et al. (2009) Aquacult. Econ. & Mgmt.
© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
                                                  Buck et al. (2003), Law International
                                            Buck et al. (2004), Ocean & Coastal Mgmt.
Break‐Even for Seaweed Cultivation: Longline culture

 Breakeven price (assumption 8 kg/m)
 Above total variable costs                         167/197 US $
 Above total costs                                  568/400 US $

 Breakeven yield (assumption: 0,7$/kg)
 Above total variable costs                        2,67/3,14 kg
 Above total costs                                 9,08/6,40kg




© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Example for possible macroalgae revenues and corresponding 
   value of raw material
   Relative value of raw material in US‐$ (→ extracted per tonne wet 
   weight)
   Carrageen                             568
   Alginate                              355
   Agar                                  1077
   Fertilisers                           500
   Soil additives                        27
   Seaweed meals (dried)                 100
   Pharmaceuticals                       1000

© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
Key Issues:

    1. Multi-use concepts ease MSP
    2. Multi-use will have a better acceptance for both
       stakeholders and would save costs.
    3. Multi-Use concepts will have economic benefits
        • Quick procedure
        • Combined EIA
        • Shared vessels/personal
              Prof. Dr. Bela H. Buck
        • training
        • Additional biomass
              Bela.H.Buck@awi.de
        • etc.

© B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012

Potentials of Multi-Use Concepts within a MSP Process Bela H. Buck

  • 1.
    Potentials of Multi-UseConcepts within a MSP Process Bela H. Buck International Marine Spatial Planning Public Symposium, Providence (RI) Courtesy of the Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH)
  • 2.
    Relatively small  N PL size of the area: EST Advantage or  S Disadvantage? RUS DK German LT Bight GB D LV NL B FIN F © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 3.
    Coastal Sea:  0‐12 nautical miles EEZ: 12‐200 nautical miles  Courtesy of BSH 2012 © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 4.
    North Sea EEZ: Baltic Sea EEZ: Schleswig‐ 2 4,500 km 28,600 km2 Holstein Hamburg Mecklenburg‐ Vorpommern Bremen Lower‐Saxony © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 5.
    MSP at an early stages: (between 2001‐2006)  Defining the actual state of  uses Shipping & Pipelines, Cables, Mariculture, Military Features Sediment, Platforms  Ascertain priorities of  different uses  Set priorities regarding  national and international  Nature Conservation Offshore Wind Farms “dependencies”. © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 6.
    What makes the decision about priorities in MSP for traditiional and  “new” uses?        or             What are the prevailing public interests?  Current national regulations and international legislations  National and international contracts Economic interests Is there a mandate and who is responsible?  No/yes  →  not EU directly  →  but implementation of EU guidelines [Natura 2000] as well as for the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP)  Driver: New uses  Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH) on behalf of and in close  co‐operation with Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 7.
    What are the tools?  planning principle (guideline that needs to be particularly considered in the  decision process)  priority areas (Vorranggebiete): reserved for a defined use, other  conflicting uses are excluded  reservation areas (Vorbehaltsgebiete): defined use with priority in this  area  suitable areas (Eignungsgebiete): defined use is excluded outside  designated areas © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 8.
    Priority list (with regard to UNCLOS) High  Safety and efficiency of shipping  National and international  contracts [e.g. pipelines, cables]  Protection of the marine  environment  National/Alliance defence Others  Resources  Scientific research  Wind farming © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 9.
    Are there potentials for more then one use? ‐ secondary use ‐ co‐use ‐ multi‐use ‐ multifunctional use © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 10.
    Case example Wind Farming:  Decision to be independent (regarding oil/gas/coal, nuclear power)  Follow the Kyoto Protocol Follow the Renewable Energies Act of Germany  35 % of electric power supply used in Germany by renewable  energy in 2020  50 % in 2030  25,000 MW by 2030 (6,000 – 8,000 turbines depending on MW‐ class)  Infrastructure‐Planning‐”Speed Up”‐Act © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 11.
    Construction of the Alpha Ventus wind farm in the EEZ 60 km off the coast of Germany. 5 MW class turbines: 65 MWh∙day‐1∙windmill‐1 8,000 €∙day‐1∙windmill‐1 70% of companies SME © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 12.
    Offshore wind  In 2009, 2.8% of Europe’s total  farm wind power was offshore. development in  192,000 people in the EU are  the North Sea employed by the offshore wind  industry Courtesy of Arne Fredheim © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 13.
    Multi-use ideas tomaximize the 1. Ecology benefit of an offshore area: - Creating MPA‘s (nursery, sustainable fisheries…) - Set-up artificial reefs 2. Tourism 3. Additional energy resources 4. Offshore Aquaculture 5. Bio-Remediation / Bio-Extraction 6. Use of fouling organisms Image taken from Barry Costa‐Pierce © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 14.
    Motivation for Cooperation Next step is to add the entire  How is the economic value of  The progression of renewable  economic framework for the  a certain site offshore: energy worldwide recently has  wind energy side and combine  coincided with a similar  → only wind farming increase in marine  it with existing mussel  → in co‐use with another  aquaculture. See worldwide  aquaculture economics.  stakeholder stagnation of fisheries’  → unclear ownership status  harvest, coupled with the  → Are there cost savings by  and insurance growth in aquaculture and  operating jointly.  wind energy over the last 30  in cooperation with Dr. Robert  years. Griffin at Stanford University  (California) © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 15.
    Research Platform FINO No. I  Marine Facilities Ordinance  Licensing procedure for offshore  wind farms → change regulation and licensing  procedure to include multi‐use  concepts as an obligation → multi‐use concepts will be  promoted (even if concepts are not  successful) © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 16.
    © B. H.Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 17.
    Meek, 1989 © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 18.
    Marine Facilities  Ordinance OSS‐Project forces  wind farm operators  to investigate in co‐ uses © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012 Buck et al. (2008), Helg. Mar. Research
  • 19.
    Mussel cultivation designs ©B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012 Buck (2007), Helg. Mar. Res. Buck et al. (2010), Aquac. Econom. Management
  • 20.
    Seaweed cultivation  longlines  ladder  grid © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 21.
    Bioextraction “An environmental managementstrategy by which nutrients are removed from an aquatic ecosystem through the harvest of enhanced biological production, including the aquaculture of suspension-feeding shellfish or algae” Ecological Engineering “Ecological Engineering is an emerging field that uses ecological processes within natural or constructed systems to achieve environmental goals” Balanced Ecosystem Approach “Fed aquaculture of finfish or shrimp with extractive organic aquaculture of shellfish and extractive inorganic aquaculture of seaweed (IMTA)” SCIENCE VOL 323 20 FEB. 2009 © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 22.
    IMTA (Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture) extractive species extractive species 1. defense line: filter feeders wind seaweed mussels farm with fish fish/ 2. defense line: fish/ wind turbine seaweeds wind turbine different directions bidirectional McVey & Buck (2008), WAS © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 23.
    Parameters measured:  Nutrients [NOX, P, Si, …]  Salinity  O2, CO2  pH  Chlorophyll FerryBox  Attenuation/turbidity  Fluorescence © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 24.
    Consideration of mechanical loads on grounding constructions of longline, cage windmills by or other aquaculture constructions devices © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 25.
    y N NW NO W O x  SW S0 S1 [N/mm²] S 8 Windrichtungen 8 Wellenanlaufrichtungen LC 5 EF 4 EF 5 EF 6 Development of static models Discussion of alternative Generation of representative (for 3-5 MWpoints ofclass) connection turbine foundation loads of wind energy LC 5 S1 [N/mm²] S1 [N/mm²] structure installations © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012 Buck et al. (2006), Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering
  • 26.
    © B. H.Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012 Buck & Krause (2010), Springer Encyclopedia
  • 27.
    © B. H.Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 28.
    Bird’s-eye view ofthe “Nordergründe” offshore wind farm Buck et al. (2009) Aquacult. Econ. & Mgmt. © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012 Buck et al. (2003), Law International Buck et al. (2004), Ocean & Coastal Mgmt.
  • 29.
    Break‐Even for Mussel Cultivation: Longline culture Breakeven price (assumption 10 kg/m) Above total variable costs 0,14Euro Above total costs 0,52Euro Breakeven yield (assumption: 1 Euro/kg) Above total variable costs 1,43kg Above total costs 5,17kg © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 30.
    Consumption mussel with new  Consumption mussel with  NPV (IRR) vessel and new land facility  existing capacity (5,667,073, 14.73%) (9,622,937, 28.11%) Price per kg mussel 0.9 € 3,369,576  (11.81) 7,325,440  (23.66) 1.1 € 7,964,570  (17.47) 11,920,433  (32.38) Total cost increase + 5 % p.a. ‐1,899,456  (2.13) 2,056,407  (15.56) Discount rates 6 % 6,867,422 10,871,396 8 % 4,611,108 8,522,651 9 % 3,678,854 7,549,757 © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 31.
    Bird’s-eye view ofthe “Cape Wind” offshore wind farm Buck et al. (2009) Aquacult. Econ. & Mgmt. © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012 Buck et al. (2003), Law International Buck et al. (2004), Ocean & Coastal Mgmt.
  • 32.
    Break‐Even for Seaweed Cultivation: Longline culture Breakeven price (assumption 8 kg/m) Above total variable costs 167/197 US $ Above total costs 568/400 US $ Breakeven yield (assumption: 0,7$/kg) Above total variable costs 2,67/3,14 kg Above total costs 9,08/6,40kg © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 33.
    Example for possible macroalgae revenues and corresponding  value of raw material Relative value of raw material in US‐$ (→ extracted per tonne wet  weight) Carrageen 568 Alginate 355 Agar 1077 Fertilisers 500 Soil additives 27 Seaweed meals (dried) 100 Pharmaceuticals 1000 © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012
  • 34.
    Key Issues: 1. Multi-use concepts ease MSP 2. Multi-use will have a better acceptance for both stakeholders and would save costs. 3. Multi-Use concepts will have economic benefits • Quick procedure • Combined EIA • Shared vessels/personal Prof. Dr. Bela H. Buck • training • Additional biomass Bela.H.Buck@awi.de • etc. © B. H. Buck 2012 - MSP-Symposium 2012