A combination of powerpoint presentations on bibliometrics in higher education, originally presented at (CONCERT) Council on Core Electronic Resources in Taiwan, November 2008 and modified for a paper on bibliometrics and university rankings.
http://ir.library.smu.edu.sg/record=d1010558
Higher education policy is the key to lifelong learning and this is particularly important as the ageing population is increasing in many countries. It is a major driver of economic competitiveness in an increasingly knowledge-driven global economy and it also brings social cohesion and well-being. Countries are increasingly aware that higher education institutions need to foster the skills required to sustain a globally competitive research base and improve knowledge dissemination to the benefit of society. Kazakhstan’s higher education system has made progress over the past ten years. However, there is scope for improvement in delivering labour-market relevant skills to Kazakhstanis, and in supporting economic growth through research and innovation.
In examining the higher education system in Kazakhstan, this report builds on a 2007 joint OECD/World Bank review: Reviews of National Policies for Education: Higher Education in Kazakhstan 2007. Each chapter presents an overview of progress made in the past decade across the main areas explored in the 2007 report. These include quality and relevance, access and equity, internationalisation, research and innovation, financing and governance. The report also examines policy responses to evolving dynamics in higher education and the wider socio-economic changes.
A combination of powerpoint presentations on bibliometrics in higher education, originally presented at (CONCERT) Council on Core Electronic Resources in Taiwan, November 2008 and modified for a paper on bibliometrics and university rankings.
http://ir.library.smu.edu.sg/record=d1010558
Higher education policy is the key to lifelong learning and this is particularly important as the ageing population is increasing in many countries. It is a major driver of economic competitiveness in an increasingly knowledge-driven global economy and it also brings social cohesion and well-being. Countries are increasingly aware that higher education institutions need to foster the skills required to sustain a globally competitive research base and improve knowledge dissemination to the benefit of society. Kazakhstan’s higher education system has made progress over the past ten years. However, there is scope for improvement in delivering labour-market relevant skills to Kazakhstanis, and in supporting economic growth through research and innovation.
In examining the higher education system in Kazakhstan, this report builds on a 2007 joint OECD/World Bank review: Reviews of National Policies for Education: Higher Education in Kazakhstan 2007. Each chapter presents an overview of progress made in the past decade across the main areas explored in the 2007 report. These include quality and relevance, access and equity, internationalisation, research and innovation, financing and governance. The report also examines policy responses to evolving dynamics in higher education and the wider socio-economic changes.
Key Findings from Focus Groups with College StudentsRobert Kelly
In September 2014, Hart Research conducted three focus groups among current college students. One group was convened in Waltham, Massachusetts, among seniors at private four-year colleges and universities. Two groups were held in Dallas, Texas—one among seniors at public four-year colleges and universities and another group among students at community colleges who expect to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
The discussions were structured to explore current college students’ understanding of their colleges’ expected learning outcomes for students, their feelings about making the transition to life after college, and their level of confidence that they will have the skills and knowledge needed to be successful after college. The discussions also sought to provide an understanding of how college students think employers weigh the importance of graduates acquiring knowledge and skills in a specific field vs. a broad range of cross-cutting skills and knowledge, as well as their impressions of the college learning outcomes that employers value most. The sessions also explored students’ participation in and perceptions of various applied learning experiences and the value of these experiences.
Key takeaways from these discussions are outlined in this memorandum. It is important to note that this is qualitative research, and thus the findings should not be interpreted as broadly representative of the views of the nation’s college students.
Optimistic About the Future, But How Well Prepared? College Students' Views o...Robert Kelly
Key findings from survey among 400 employers and 613 college students conducted in November and December 2014 for The Association of American Colleges and Universities by Hart Research Associates.
From November 13 to December 3, 2014, Hart Research conducted an online survey on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities among 613 college students—all of whom were ages 18 to 29 and within a year of obtaining a degree, or in the case of two-year college students, within a year of obtaining a degree or transferring to a four-year college. These students included 304 four-year public college seniors, 151 four-year private college seniors, and 158 community college students who plan to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
Prior to the survey, in September 2014, Hart Research conducted three focus groups among current college students. One group was convened in Waltham, Massachusetts, among seniors at private four-year colleges and universities. Two groups were held in Dallas, Texas—one group among seniors at public four-year colleges and universities and another group among students at community colleges who expect to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
The focus groups and survey were undertaken to explore college students’ views on what really matters in college, including what learning outcomes are most important to them personally and for their future success. The research also explored current college students’ sense of the job market today, their confidence in being able to secure a job, and how effectively they think that their college learning has prepared them for this. The research was designed to understand the learning outcomes students believe are most important to acquire to be able to succeed in today’s economy and how well they feel that their college or university has prepared them in these areas. It also explored their participation in various applied and project-based learning experiences, as well as their perceptions of the degree to which employers value these experiences when hiring recent college graduates.
The survey of college students was conducted in tandem with a survey of 400 employers, and explored many of the same topics to provide a comparison between these two audiences.
This report highlights key findings from the research among college students. Selected comparisons with employers are included where relevant. A report of selected findings from the survey of employers was released by AAC&U in January 2015.
International rankings of universities; An overview for managers M&C TU DelftKim Huijpen
Presentation on international rankings of universities by Kim Huijpen.
Presented on Monday the 17th of October 2011 to managers Marketing & Communication of Delft University of Technology .
Sheets 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 28 and 29 are from earlier presentations by Johan Verweij. Sheets 2 and 23 are based on sheets from earlier presentations by Johan Verweij.
Conferencia de Alfonso Echazarra, analista de la OCDE, sobre los resultados de PISA 2015 y el futuro de esta evaluación presentada dentro del Simposio Ciencias e Inglés en la evaluación internacional. La cultura de la evaluación en Ciencias e Inglés.
Teachers are the most important resource in today’s schools. In every country, teachers’ salaries and training represent the greatest share of expenditure in education. And this investment in teachers can have significant returns: research shows that being taught by the best teachers can make a real difference in the learning and life outcomes of otherwise similar students. Teachers, in other words, are not interchangeable workers in some sort of industrial assembly line; individual teachers can change lives – and better teachers are crucial to improving the education that schools provide. Improving the effectiveness, efficiency and equity of schooling depends, in large measure, on ensuring that competent people want to work as teachers, that their teaching is of high quality and that high-quality teaching is provided to all students. This report, building on data from the Indicators of Education Systems (INES) programme, the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), explores three teacher-policy questions: How do the best-performing countries select, develop, evaluate and compensate teachers? How does teacher sorting across schools affect the equity of education systems? And how can countries attract and retain talented men and women to teaching?
Do you know “Over 43% of ISI papers has never received any citations?” (nature.com/top100, 2014). Publishing a high quality paper in scientific journals is only halfway towards receiving citation in the future. The rest of the journey is dependent on disseminating the publications via proper utilization of the “Research Tools”. Proper tools allow the researchers to increase the research impact and citations for their publications. These workshop series will provide various techniques on how one can increase the visibility and enhance the impact of one’s research work.
Learning analytics: An opportunity for higher education?Dragan Gasevic
Slides used in my keynote at the Annual Conference of the European Association of Distance Teaching Universities - The open, online, flexible higher education conference - #OOFHEC2015
The high performing students need appropriate electives to meet their career plan. Many may plan to further higher education programs in research universities. These concepts are explained in this presentation/
Optimistic About the Future, But How Well Prepared? College Students' Views o...Robert Kelly
Key findings from survey among 400 employers and 613 college students conducted in November and December 2014 for The Association of American Colleges and Universities by Hart Research Associates.
From November 13 to December 3, 2014, Hart Research conducted an online survey on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities among 613 college students—all of whom were ages 18 to 29 and within a year of obtaining a degree, or in the case of two-year college students, within a year of obtaining a degree or transferring to a four-year college. These students included 304 four-year public college seniors, 151 four-year private college seniors, and 158 community college students who plan to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
Prior to the survey, in September 2014, Hart Research conducted three focus groups among current college students. One group was convened in Waltham, Massachusetts, among seniors at private four-year colleges and universities. Two groups were held in Dallas, Texas—one group among seniors at public four-year colleges and universities and another group among students at community colleges who expect to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
The focus groups and survey were undertaken to explore college students’ views on what really matters in college, including what learning outcomes are most important to them personally and for their future success. The research also explored current college students’ sense of the job market today, their confidence in being able to secure a job, and how effectively they think that their college learning has prepared them for this. The research was designed to understand the learning outcomes students believe are most important to acquire to be able to succeed in today’s economy and how well they feel that their college or university has prepared them in these areas. It also explored their participation in various applied and project-based learning experiences, as well as their perceptions of the degree to which employers value these experiences when hiring recent college graduates.
The survey of college students was conducted in tandem with a survey of 400 employers, and explored many of the same topics to provide a comparison between these two audiences.
This report highlights key findings from the research among college students. Selected comparisons with employers are included where relevant. A report of selected findings from the survey of employers was released by AAC&U in January 2015.
Planning industry relevant engineering programs to meet the needs of industr...Thanikachalam Vedhathiri
The impact of Industry-4.0, and disruptive technologies demand industry ready graduates. This PPT gives a method planning industry specific engineering programs.
TALIS 2018 - Teacher professionalism in the face of COVID-19 (London, 23 Marc...EduSkills OECD
The world is currently facing a health pandemic and sanitary crisis without precedent in our recent history.
This has affected the normal functioning of education systems worldwide. Nearly all of the 48 countries and economies participating in TALIS are now facing mass and prolonged school closures on all or significant parts of their territory, and UNESCO estimates that 1.25 billion learners are impacted worldwide – i.e. nearly 73% of total enrolments.
This is a major external shock on the operations of our schools and the work of our teachers, who have had to move to distance and digital education offerings within a few days. It is also a major shock and challenge for parents who have been turned into home-schoolers overnight, with no training for this!
This is an odd timing to present the findings of a report depicting the functioning of schools and the work of teachers “before Covid-19”. And although there are lots of interesting things in this report, this is not a priority for today.
Today, I would like to reflect instead on how school and teachers can adapt to these dire circumstances and carry forward their teaching.
Today, I would like to focus on TALIS findings that can help educational systems as they deal with the crisis, and think forward in working out possible strategies to cope with these circumstances.
Today, I would like to convey hope that we can count on teachers to rise to the challenges.
Education, data policy and practice - Kim Schildkamp EduSkills OECD
This presentation was given by Kim Schildkamp of the University of Twente, Netherlands at the GCES Conference on Education Governance: The Role of Data in Tallinn on 12 February during the session on Keynote: Education data, policy and practice.
Key Findings from Focus Groups with College StudentsRobert Kelly
In September 2014, Hart Research conducted three focus groups among current college students. One group was convened in Waltham, Massachusetts, among seniors at private four-year colleges and universities. Two groups were held in Dallas, Texas—one among seniors at public four-year colleges and universities and another group among students at community colleges who expect to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
The discussions were structured to explore current college students’ understanding of their colleges’ expected learning outcomes for students, their feelings about making the transition to life after college, and their level of confidence that they will have the skills and knowledge needed to be successful after college. The discussions also sought to provide an understanding of how college students think employers weigh the importance of graduates acquiring knowledge and skills in a specific field vs. a broad range of cross-cutting skills and knowledge, as well as their impressions of the college learning outcomes that employers value most. The sessions also explored students’ participation in and perceptions of various applied learning experiences and the value of these experiences.
Key takeaways from these discussions are outlined in this memorandum. It is important to note that this is qualitative research, and thus the findings should not be interpreted as broadly representative of the views of the nation’s college students.
Optimistic About the Future, But How Well Prepared? College Students' Views o...Robert Kelly
Key findings from survey among 400 employers and 613 college students conducted in November and December 2014 for The Association of American Colleges and Universities by Hart Research Associates.
From November 13 to December 3, 2014, Hart Research conducted an online survey on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities among 613 college students—all of whom were ages 18 to 29 and within a year of obtaining a degree, or in the case of two-year college students, within a year of obtaining a degree or transferring to a four-year college. These students included 304 four-year public college seniors, 151 four-year private college seniors, and 158 community college students who plan to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
Prior to the survey, in September 2014, Hart Research conducted three focus groups among current college students. One group was convened in Waltham, Massachusetts, among seniors at private four-year colleges and universities. Two groups were held in Dallas, Texas—one group among seniors at public four-year colleges and universities and another group among students at community colleges who expect to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
The focus groups and survey were undertaken to explore college students’ views on what really matters in college, including what learning outcomes are most important to them personally and for their future success. The research also explored current college students’ sense of the job market today, their confidence in being able to secure a job, and how effectively they think that their college learning has prepared them for this. The research was designed to understand the learning outcomes students believe are most important to acquire to be able to succeed in today’s economy and how well they feel that their college or university has prepared them in these areas. It also explored their participation in various applied and project-based learning experiences, as well as their perceptions of the degree to which employers value these experiences when hiring recent college graduates.
The survey of college students was conducted in tandem with a survey of 400 employers, and explored many of the same topics to provide a comparison between these two audiences.
This report highlights key findings from the research among college students. Selected comparisons with employers are included where relevant. A report of selected findings from the survey of employers was released by AAC&U in January 2015.
International rankings of universities; An overview for managers M&C TU DelftKim Huijpen
Presentation on international rankings of universities by Kim Huijpen.
Presented on Monday the 17th of October 2011 to managers Marketing & Communication of Delft University of Technology .
Sheets 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 28 and 29 are from earlier presentations by Johan Verweij. Sheets 2 and 23 are based on sheets from earlier presentations by Johan Verweij.
Conferencia de Alfonso Echazarra, analista de la OCDE, sobre los resultados de PISA 2015 y el futuro de esta evaluación presentada dentro del Simposio Ciencias e Inglés en la evaluación internacional. La cultura de la evaluación en Ciencias e Inglés.
Teachers are the most important resource in today’s schools. In every country, teachers’ salaries and training represent the greatest share of expenditure in education. And this investment in teachers can have significant returns: research shows that being taught by the best teachers can make a real difference in the learning and life outcomes of otherwise similar students. Teachers, in other words, are not interchangeable workers in some sort of industrial assembly line; individual teachers can change lives – and better teachers are crucial to improving the education that schools provide. Improving the effectiveness, efficiency and equity of schooling depends, in large measure, on ensuring that competent people want to work as teachers, that their teaching is of high quality and that high-quality teaching is provided to all students. This report, building on data from the Indicators of Education Systems (INES) programme, the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), explores three teacher-policy questions: How do the best-performing countries select, develop, evaluate and compensate teachers? How does teacher sorting across schools affect the equity of education systems? And how can countries attract and retain talented men and women to teaching?
Do you know “Over 43% of ISI papers has never received any citations?” (nature.com/top100, 2014). Publishing a high quality paper in scientific journals is only halfway towards receiving citation in the future. The rest of the journey is dependent on disseminating the publications via proper utilization of the “Research Tools”. Proper tools allow the researchers to increase the research impact and citations for their publications. These workshop series will provide various techniques on how one can increase the visibility and enhance the impact of one’s research work.
Learning analytics: An opportunity for higher education?Dragan Gasevic
Slides used in my keynote at the Annual Conference of the European Association of Distance Teaching Universities - The open, online, flexible higher education conference - #OOFHEC2015
The high performing students need appropriate electives to meet their career plan. Many may plan to further higher education programs in research universities. These concepts are explained in this presentation/
Optimistic About the Future, But How Well Prepared? College Students' Views o...Robert Kelly
Key findings from survey among 400 employers and 613 college students conducted in November and December 2014 for The Association of American Colleges and Universities by Hart Research Associates.
From November 13 to December 3, 2014, Hart Research conducted an online survey on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities among 613 college students—all of whom were ages 18 to 29 and within a year of obtaining a degree, or in the case of two-year college students, within a year of obtaining a degree or transferring to a four-year college. These students included 304 four-year public college seniors, 151 four-year private college seniors, and 158 community college students who plan to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
Prior to the survey, in September 2014, Hart Research conducted three focus groups among current college students. One group was convened in Waltham, Massachusetts, among seniors at private four-year colleges and universities. Two groups were held in Dallas, Texas—one group among seniors at public four-year colleges and universities and another group among students at community colleges who expect to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
The focus groups and survey were undertaken to explore college students’ views on what really matters in college, including what learning outcomes are most important to them personally and for their future success. The research also explored current college students’ sense of the job market today, their confidence in being able to secure a job, and how effectively they think that their college learning has prepared them for this. The research was designed to understand the learning outcomes students believe are most important to acquire to be able to succeed in today’s economy and how well they feel that their college or university has prepared them in these areas. It also explored their participation in various applied and project-based learning experiences, as well as their perceptions of the degree to which employers value these experiences when hiring recent college graduates.
The survey of college students was conducted in tandem with a survey of 400 employers, and explored many of the same topics to provide a comparison between these two audiences.
This report highlights key findings from the research among college students. Selected comparisons with employers are included where relevant. A report of selected findings from the survey of employers was released by AAC&U in January 2015.
Planning industry relevant engineering programs to meet the needs of industr...Thanikachalam Vedhathiri
The impact of Industry-4.0, and disruptive technologies demand industry ready graduates. This PPT gives a method planning industry specific engineering programs.
TALIS 2018 - Teacher professionalism in the face of COVID-19 (London, 23 Marc...EduSkills OECD
The world is currently facing a health pandemic and sanitary crisis without precedent in our recent history.
This has affected the normal functioning of education systems worldwide. Nearly all of the 48 countries and economies participating in TALIS are now facing mass and prolonged school closures on all or significant parts of their territory, and UNESCO estimates that 1.25 billion learners are impacted worldwide – i.e. nearly 73% of total enrolments.
This is a major external shock on the operations of our schools and the work of our teachers, who have had to move to distance and digital education offerings within a few days. It is also a major shock and challenge for parents who have been turned into home-schoolers overnight, with no training for this!
This is an odd timing to present the findings of a report depicting the functioning of schools and the work of teachers “before Covid-19”. And although there are lots of interesting things in this report, this is not a priority for today.
Today, I would like to reflect instead on how school and teachers can adapt to these dire circumstances and carry forward their teaching.
Today, I would like to focus on TALIS findings that can help educational systems as they deal with the crisis, and think forward in working out possible strategies to cope with these circumstances.
Today, I would like to convey hope that we can count on teachers to rise to the challenges.
Education, data policy and practice - Kim Schildkamp EduSkills OECD
This presentation was given by Kim Schildkamp of the University of Twente, Netherlands at the GCES Conference on Education Governance: The Role of Data in Tallinn on 12 February during the session on Keynote: Education data, policy and practice.
Strengthening universities' reputation in the global educational communityChristian Dougoud
Strengthening universities' reputation in the global educational community.
Presentation given at the World Communication Forum in Davos. 12nd March 2014, by Christian Dougoud
Boosting student success: The role of data analyticsPeter Alston
In this short presentation to the Chartered ABS Annual Conference 2016, Baback and myself will talk about the importance of Learning Analytics and how it may prove to be a useful tool with regards to the impending Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) Review. Baback and I will also talk about our own experiences and highlight what we are doing with respect to learning analytics.
Transformational Management Roles of a Teaching Learning Centre in an Academi...Padmanabhan Krishnan
The Academic Staff College of VIT was started in 2004, three years after the Vellore Engineering College became a Deemed University under the UGC 1956 act 3.
The roles and responsibilities are to train the trainer, empower the trainer, disseminate knowledge to the students through the trainer or the faculty and assist in inclusive growth .
To improve the teaching and learning outcomes and the ranking and accreditation outcomes of the Institution.
To work on feedback from the faculty, staff, experts , organizations and auditors for continual improvement
About 150 developmental programmes are conducted each year by the ASC in multiple disciplines. The ASC has given birth to the Distance Learning and the VIT On-line Learning Centres down the years since inception.
Learning analytics are more than measurementDragan Gasevic
Slides used for the keynote
Learning analytics are more than measurement
at
Policies for Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics Briefing
organized by http://www.laceproject.eu/
Similar to MM Bagali........ Bagali........ Higher Education..... Research ........ HR, HRM, HRD.... (20)
MM Bagali ....IPL ..... miss you this time; come soon ..... IPL ..... miss you this time; come soon ..... IPL ..... miss you this time; come soon ..... MM Bagali ....IPL ..... miss you this time; come soon .....
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology:
Ethnobotany in herbal drug evaluation,
Impact of Ethnobotany in traditional medicine,
New development in herbals,
Bio-prospecting tools for drug discovery,
Role of Ethnopharmacology in drug evaluation,
Reverse Pharmacology.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
MM Bagali........ Bagali........ Higher Education..... Research ........ HR, HRM, HRD....
1. mm bagali I centre for human resources and higher education I bengaluru
good morning
2. “Recent Advances and Challenges for Quality
Assurance and Accreditation in the Higher Education
for Modern World” ( December 11th - 23rd 2017)
Academic Productivity
Measurement in Higher Education
Institutes: Experience from Asian
Countries and Lessons for India
3. APO Asian Country
understanding
7-10 aug, 2107
indonesia
Bangladesh
Cambodia
Fiji
India
Indonesia
Iran
Lao PDR
Malaysia
Nepal
Pakistan
Philippines
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Vietnam
Resources Person
Australia
USA
Country Paper
Indian Higher Education:
A Kaleidoscope of Development, Progress,
Challenges and Oppournities
Dr. M M Bagali, PhD
Director
School of Management Studies,
Professor of Human Resource Management,
Bengaluru, India
SP Goyal
Principal Secretary to the Hon'ble Chief Minister
Government of Uttar Pradesh,
Fifth Floor, Lal Bahadur Shastri Bhawan,
Lucknow, India
4. Recent Advances
Challenges Quality Assurance
and Accreditation
Higher Education
for Modern World
Global Ranking
Scopus
UGC ranked /
listed journals
ISSN
ISBN
indexed
peer reviewed
Plagiarism
Scope for
research
Time divide
Am I faculty or I
am researcher
or I am Admin….
Post Doct
International
Connects
rigor/relevance
NAAC
NBA
ISO
NIRF
private
MOOC
Online
Swayam
Tech used
Certification
Global exposure
Global faculty
Global Visits
Benchmark
Blended model
Higher Education Productivity Metrics
9. Top 6 Universities for Engineering &
Technology 2015/16
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) ...
Stanford University …
University of Cambridge. ...
National University of Singapore (NUS) ...
ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of
Technology) ...
Nanyang Technological University (NTU)
who certified or
accredited?
10. who certified or accredited?
they are recognised by the
academic community
they are recognised by the industry/
corporates
they are recognised peer groups
they are recognised by research
bodies
11. what is needed by all of us !!
NAAC
NBA
ISO
NIRF
if yes, fine….. but, List in
world Class University !!
if NO, what can be done /
what should be done !!
12. How do Indian Higher Education Institutes figure in World Class List of
University;
If they are figured now, fine…..
If they are not figured, why ……
how do you all feel, why many don't figure !!!!!
13. How do Indian Higher Education Institutes figure in World Class List of
University;
MIT-USA and Harvard University-USA produced 74 and 46 Noble
Laureates, as of 2017. How can Indian University Higher Education
Institutes march towards this;
Oxford University, has 140 country students on campus, and applies
for Patent every week. How can Indian University Higher Education
Institutes promote on wider scale and bigger canvas;
In USA, Faculty and Alumina together have established several MNC’s
with trillions of $US. This trend is less reflected in Indian community,
and Indian University Higher Education Institutes don’t have
impressive numbers to reflect such figures;
14. Indonesia / aug / 2017
Experts at the Productivity Measurement
workshop, and Discussions with all the Delegates from 20 countries
Productivity Matrix for Higher Education Institutions
15. the measurement of outcome should reflect in this
THE’s World University Rankings
The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU)
The QS - Quacquarelli Symonds- World University Rankings
The Times Higher Education Ranking
NIRF
19. Productivity
focus areas
General
Teaching
Research
Administration
Hours of work
Publications
Indian Context
NAAC
Curricular Aspects
Teaching-Learning and Evaluation
Research, Consultancy and Extension
Infrastructure and Learning Resources
Student Support and Progression
Governance, Leadership
and Management
Innovations and Best Practices
NBA
Physical requirements
Governance
Human Resources
Academic Program
……
NIRF
Teaching, Learning & Resources
Research and Professional Practice
Graduation Outcomes
Outreach and Inclusivity
Perception of Stake hold……
20. Productivity
focus areas
Level 1-6 years 7-12 years 12 -18 years 20+
Teaching……
Research……
Inst Devp……
Consultancy……
Publications……
Asian Context
21. Productivity
focus areas
Level 1-6 years 7-12 years 12 -18 years 20+
Teaching…… 60%
Research…… 20%
Inst Devp…… -%
Consultancy……05%
Publications……15%
35%
25%
05%
10%
25%
10%
40%
15%
15%
20%
?
?
?
?
?
Asian Context
22. Productivity
focus areas
Level 1-6 years 7-12 years 12 -18 years 20+
Teaching……
Research……
Inst Devp……
Consultancy……
Publications……
04%
40%
15%
25%
15+1%
10%
40%
15%
15%
20%
35%
25%
05%
10%
25%
Asian Context
23. Productivity
focus areas
Level 1-6 years 7-12 years 12 -18 years 20+
Teaching…… 60%
Research…… 20%
Inst Devp…… -%
Consultancy……05%
Publications……15%
35%
25%
05%
10%
25%
10%
40%
15%
15%
20%
04%
40%
15%
25%
15+1%
Asian Context
24. the signs of a teaching
faculty
The performance indicators
Teaching (the learning
environment)
Research (volume, income and
reputation)
Citations (research influence)
International outlook (staff,
students and research)
Industry income (knowledge
transfer)
Others…..
25. Asian Country Indicators
impact
influence
relevance
rigor
revenue
Paper publications
Books publication
working paper
White / Policy paper
TV talk
Editor
Board of Director on MNC
Policy Committee
Invitations
Research
Consultancy
Teaching
Course Development
Workshop / Seminar / Conference
contribution
specified
research
projects
MOOC
26. rigor
course development
course registration
research area
consultancy
reputation survey
visibility among peers
research influence
policy documents ….at what level
appearing in top journals
referred / invited talk @ Academy
Conference
27. 5 - 3 - 1 framework
5 attract
every faculty
should refer 5
relevant profiles;
referrals
3 retain
3 top performers;
engage them;
prevent attrition
1 develop
coach;
mentor;career
path;competency;
leadership position
28. impact of your research /
teaching Output Model!!
REI Model
Relevance - Engagement - Impact
PRM Model
Process of Improvement - Revenue - Margins
40. associate professor +
teaching
research - guide
post doctoral - funding
funding for research councils
workshop
conference
seminar/ symposium
csr-committee
research council team
awards / prizes
42. associate professor +
Other Metrics
how many drop=outs / average attendance
in your course
characteristic of students
background- composition
alumina connect to the course
course development/New pedagogies
support peer….demonstrate
44. professor / rector /
dean +
national research funding
committee
citations
references
international invitations,
awards, honours
business impact
mou’s and collaborations
board members of mnc's
you should secure
Chair Professor
45. professor / rector /
dean +
citations
Journal Lists for Searchable Databases
Web of Science Core Collection
Arts & Humanities Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Social Sciences Citation Index
Emerging Sources Citation Index
Subject Indexes on the Web of Science platform
Current Contents Connect
Current Contents / Agriculture, Biology & Environmental Sciences
Current Contents / Arts & Humanities
Current Contents / Clinical Medicine
Current Contents / Engineering, Computing & Technology
Current Contents / Life Sciences
Current Contents / Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences
Current Contents / Social & Behavioral Sciences
Current Contents Collections / Business Collection
Current Contents Collections / Electronics & Telecommunications Collection
Other Collections
Science Citation Index
46. professor / rector /
dean +
research
books
papers
creative materials
research guidance- ongoing; complected
placements - level;profile; JD
download of digital material of your stuff
sponsored research funding
collaborative projects with industry
PATENT / INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
FUND GENERATED = FUND SAVED= NET SAVED
USEABILITY + VALUE + OUTCOME
47. professor / rector /
dean +
course introduction
relevance
registration
revenue
placements
level
salary
job profile
your book into course
your course into case
your case into revenue
48. Journals
Journal Citation Reports (Thomson Reuters)
Impact Factor
- [# of citations in a year]/[total # of articles published in 2 previous years]
Eugene Garfield
Article Influence (uses Thomson Reuters citation data; in Journal Citation
Reports)
Scopus (Elsevier)
Journal Analyzer (uses Elsevier citation data; in Scopus)
SNIP (uses Elsevier citation data; in Scopus)
SJR (uses Elsevier citation data; in Scopus)
h index (used in many citation trackers including
Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus)
Based on author's years active as well as number of citations of specific
articles
g index (used in Publish or Perish, elsewhere)- Adds weight to heavily-cited
articles in h-index metric
Adds weight to heavily-cited articles in h-index metric
Citation Tracker (Scopus)
h index (researchers' impact) (Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar)
h-Graph (depicts impact of a set of articles) (Scopus)
Journal Citation Reports (Journal Citation Reports (WoS)
Citation Map (Web of Science)
My Citations (Google Scholar)
55. sr professor / dean /
director +
research - impact
World 20 best jl
relevance - value creation
editor - peer jl
membership
consultancy
revenue level- 30c
mnc’s level
indi X team
report/high visibility
assignment
teaching
corporate university
mdp
visiting
develop-teach course
research ; education program; mdp’s; consultancy;
writing; case; books; …… gross and net MARGINS
56. sr professor / dean /
director +
academic journals indexed by Elsevier’s Scopus database per scholar,
research journal publications that have at least one international co-author
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings
World 20 best jl
57. tech used
app used
flipped classroom
gamification strategies
blended learning
ebooks, journals
social media
mood
online
webinar
have separate websites
post doctoral assignment
rewards / honors/ recoginations
phd review committee member
59. chair professor
chair conditions
Top 10 Journals
On Editorial Board
Advisory Council
Board Member of Corporate
Award / Prize Committee Member
Book / Report / Edited volumes
/ Chapters
Visibility in Prof. Association
Best Seller Book Series
Invited Publications, Editorials,
Consultancy
contributions
Public Testimony
Research Services
Conference/ seminars
60. everyone at the
schools
GLOBAL TEACHING
EXCELLENCE AWARD 2018:
Celebrating institution-wide
teaching excellence
leading to Global Teaching
Excellence Award 2018. The
accolade will be awarded to an
institution in recognition of
outstanding approaches to
teaching
Promoted by Higher Education
Academy
61. data collection
academic audit
students satisfaction survey
external agencies
corporate perception
enrolments / registrations
…….
input / output + cross = net MARGIN
63. “Productivity” has many facets, e.g..
Amount of output
Output relative to input
Financial return
Popular measures include:
Degrees and other awards
Student-faculty ratios
Time to degree
Cost per credit or degree
Net revenue from a program
These remind us of the blind men and
the elephant: each man sees a piece,
but no one can visualize the whole.
Productivity !!
“In higher education,
productivity improvement is
seen as the most
promising strategy for
containing costs in the
continuing effort to expand
access and affordability
while keeping the quality of
higher education … at
world-class levels.”
Mackie (2016), p. 1.
64. “Productivity” has many facets, e.g..
Quantity produced
Quality produced
Efficiency
Effective
Earned Revenue
Value….. intrinsic X extrinsic
Productivity !!
66. Increasing Students Expectations X Productivity Indicators
1996 era
Get Admissions
Get Good College/ University
Get Degree
Get Good Grades
2017 days
Global Placements / Exposure
Connected Class rooms
ICT/ MOOC’s
Industry Oriented
Flipped Classrooms
360 degree personality development
………..
67. Facilitators and blockers???
What are the main facilitators to spurring work in your institutions and
country/system? How can these be secured?
68. Facilitators and blockers???
What are the main facilitators to spurring work in your institutions and
country/system? How can these be secured?
Management - goals
Colleges
Social Support system
Personality of Institutes
Eco-system - resources
Process efficiency
69. Facilitators and blockers???
What are the blockers hindering uptake of productivity-related work? How can these be recognised
and mitigated?
Mismatched curriculum
Gap Between one and other unversities in term of facilities
Quality of Students
Quality of Lecturers
what is the definition of Quality !!!
70. factors influencing
Productivity !!
Productivity of academics/staff
Incentivising people
Workload balance
Faculty quality/qualifications
Formal training of academician
Institutional governance
Transparent linking of leadership with productivity
Mission clarity/differentiation
Allocating resources
Collaboration at Institutional level
74. How do Indian Higher Education Institutes figure in World Class List of
University;
MIT-USA and Harvard University-USA produced 74 and 46 Noble
Laureates, as of 2017. How can Indian University Higher Education
Institutes march towards this;
Oxford University, has 140 country students on campus, and applies
for Patent every week. How can Indian University Higher Education
Institutes promote on wider scale and bigger canvas;
In USA, Faculty and Alumina together have established several MNC’s
with trillions of $US. This trend is less reflected in Indian community,
and Indian University Higher Education Institutes don’t have
impressive numbers to reflect such figures;
75. International profile in terms of teaching program, Professors, faculty, dual
degree with World class University, collaborations, MOU’s, multi-cultural-
multidisciplinary academic milieu is absent;
Overseas students registering for Indian Education in different Universities
is not impressive, compared to some Developed and Developing counties;
A Report says that, 4,50,000 Indian students spend over $US 13 Billion each
year in acquiring higher education overseas. How do Indian University
retain and get enchased by having this segment stay back;
76. Multiple statutory bodies have suffocated and paralyzed the
system, with several regulatory approvals and requirements,
which are hindrance to growth and development of Indian
University Higher Education Institutes;
High Competency faculty team with Global and International
exposure, bagged with Global Research aptitude and Global
Recognition and Reputation is missing in most Indian University
Higher Education Institutes teaching community;
Many Indian University Higher Education Institutes Professors
and Faculty are not part of Corporate Boards, Editors, Editorial
Boards of International Research Journal; Chair of International
conference and World Meets;
77. While 100% FDI in Higher Education exists in India, along with
Foreign University establishment, how do we cope with the World
Class University;
Update teaching curriculum; using of MOOC; technology enabled
methodology; Global Philanthropists support of University; and
the like are few other areas of concern;
Lastly, How can we get away with this culture and practice of
favouritism, casteism, nepotism, and bring an atmosphere of total
merit oriented/performance driven practices and culture…..
78. Recent Advances
Challenges Quality Assurance
and Accreditation
Higher Education
for Modern World
Global Ranking
Scopus
UGC ranked /
listed journals
ISSN
ISBN
indexed
Scope for
research
Time divide
Am I faculty or I
am researcher
MOOC
Online
Tech used
Certification
Global exposure
Global faculty
Global Visits
Benchmark
Higher Education Productivity Metrics
NAAC
NBA
ISO
NIRF
79. Broadly used for understanding the “Quality
Status” of an institution. The accreditation status
indicates that the particular Higher Educational
Institutions (HEI) meets the standards of quality
set. NAAC has identified the following seven
criteria to serve as the basis of its assessment
procedures:
1. Curricular Aspects; 2. Teaching-Learning and
Evaluation; 3. Research, Consultancy and
Extension; 4. Infrastructure and Learning
Resources; 5. Student Support and Progression;
6. Governance, Leadership and Management; 7.
Innovations and Best Practices
5 Star
4 Star
3 Star
A++
A=
A
B++
B+
B
C
D…. NO
NAACNational Assessment and
Accreditation council
80. NBA…Initially established by AICTE for
periodic evaluations of technical institutions &
programmes. It has the full authority to
recognise or derecognize institutions and
programmes under them. It is the only
authorized body in India entrusted with the
task of undertaking accreditation of technical
education programmes, and NBA is part of this
council, which checks the Quality standards in
Engineering Higher Education Institutes.
NBA
The National Board of Accreditation
81. NIRF
National Institutional Ranking Framework
Indian Government established, 2015, The
National Institutional Ranking Framework,
evaluating the Quality and Output of all the
University in Indian on 5 parameters:
1. Teaching, Learning & Resources;
2.Research and Professional Practice; 3.
Graduation Outcomes; 4. Outreach and
Inclusivity; 5. Perception of Stake hold
94. | 94
AttributesofaGoodMetric
1. Adequacy. The metric should correspond to the object or concept
being evaluated.
2. Sensitivity. The metric should vary in a manner consistent with the
“inertia” of the object being measured.
3. Homogeneity. The metric should be homogeneous in its
composition, so that it will not send ambiguous signals about which
objects are changing.
Based on Yves Gingras, Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses
(Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2016.
96. Shared problems and prospects of higher
education—common experiences globally
and in Asia
97. • Global demand rising rapidly since turn of century
• Economies mature, requiring more educated workers
• Competition for higher levels of credential/
competency
• People have longer careers, requiring retraining
• Asia has a special role to play in global workforce
Unprecedented
demand
98. • Legacy higher education designed for elite
provision
• Many collegial approaches do not scale well
• Scaling higher education creates discontinuities
• Complexities with cross-subsidisations,
conventional academic work, new forms of
governance
Choking supply
99. • Universities have large infrastructure costs, large labour
costs and rely on expensive face-to-face provision
• High fixed and variable costs, and limited economies of
scale
• Increasing pressure to explore revised cost structures
• New ‘academic production functions required’
The
‘cost disease’
100. • Typically limited revenue options regarding price
or numbers
• Regulation and subsidy carries double-edge
sword
• The international circuit breaker
• Need mew financing options into the future
The revenue
squeeze
101. • Waning emphasis on quality process/inputs
• Accountability for standards
• Shift to focus on outcomes
• Shift to focus on students
Increased
regulatory pressure
102. • Economic pressures are enveloping core
education business
• New streams of private finance flowing into
higher education
• Problems for universities around ownership,
disclosure and autonomy
New
commercial constraints
103. • New transnational influences eroding national
protective barriers
• Emerging international ecosystem structured by
market power and finance
• System actors strive to respond in pre-/post-system
world
• New governance trends – unclear what
strategies/policies are at play
Stratification
pressures
104. • Governments value reach and returns of scarce
public funds
• Institutions seek uncontested market space
through differentiation
• Isomorphic paradoxes driven by market and
regulatory forces
Desires
for diversity
105. • Knowledge being flat-packed
• Promulgation of online, open-access,
proprietary products
• Providers repackage information, though
bottlenecking with assessment
• Technology a facilitator not disruptor
Changing
education fundamentals
106. • More standardised provision compresses quality
• More challenges to achieving excellence
• Need new perspectives on quality given changes
in core business
New views
on quality
107. • Need new ‘academic production functions’
• Redesign/re-engineer core research and education
processes
• Innovate corporate/financial systems to support renewed
processes
• Unique opportunities for fast-developing Asian systems to
create novel ‘smart-HE’
Shift policy and management to create new ways of doing
core academic business
We need
new approaches
109. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
place my thanks to APO, NPC, Experts at the Productivity Measurement
workshop, and Discussions with all the Delegates from 20 countries
110. Director, Professor, Coach
M M Bagali, PhD, PhD
Grace Residency enclave,
3rd Block, 2nd Cross, 1st Phase,
HBR layout, Kalyanagar post, Bangalore - North 560 043
98809 86979 I dr.mmbagali@gmail.com
Reference for the scholarly work
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mmbagali/
https://scholar.google.com/citations?
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mettu_Bagali/publications
http://jainuniversity.academia.edu/MMBagali
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mettu_Bagali/reputation
https://www.slideshare.net/sanbag
( creating tomorrow india, today )
Centre for
Human Resources and Higher Education