Measuring the behavioral component of financial fluctuaction. An analysis based on the S&P 500 - Caporin M., Corazzini L., Costola M. - November 8, 2013.
This document summarizes a study that measures the behavioral component of financial market fluctuations using a model with two types of investors - rational investors who maximize expected utility, and behavioral investors who have S-shaped utility functions. The model blends the asset selections of these two investor types using a Bayesian approach, with the rational investor preferences as the prior and behavioral investor preferences as the conditional. An empirical analysis is conducted using the S&P 500 to estimate the optimal weighting parameter between the two investor types that maximizes past cumulative returns.
Measuring the behavioral component of financial fluctuation: an analysis bas...SYRTO Project
Measuring the behavioral component of financial fluctuation: an analysis based on the S&P500 - Caporin M., Corazzini L., Costola M. June, 27 2013. IFABS 2013 - Posters session.
Risk Parity with Uncertain Risk ContributionsAnish Shah
Risk parity is portfolio construction technique that, using risk alone, scales each part of a portfolio - e.g., stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities - so that its contribution to net portfolio risk matches its budgeted risk. Because contributions are measured using a point-estimate of covariance, the method is subject to problems of estimation error. Presented is a way to solve risk parity with covariance modeled as uncertain in order to achieve a weighting robust to changes in regime and hidden risks from misperceived hedging.
Having wide application outside of risk parity are the uncertain contributions calculated en route. Reporting a portfolio's "uncertain risk decomposition" reveals the range around numbers and, more important, the risks that arise from being wrong, e.g., market's going from invisible to the biggest latent risk in a seemingly beta-hedged long-short portfolio.
Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learningDanbi Cho
The presentation describes the AI bias with adversarial learning.
It includes the AI Fairness 360 open source by IBM.
I presented this paper in the natural language processing lab as an undergraduate research assistant.
(July 9th, 2019)
Measuring the behavioral component of financial fluctuation: an analysis bas...SYRTO Project
Measuring the behavioral component of financial fluctuation: an analysis based on the S&P500 - Caporin M., Corazzini L., Costola M. June, 27 2013. IFABS 2013 - Posters session.
Risk Parity with Uncertain Risk ContributionsAnish Shah
Risk parity is portfolio construction technique that, using risk alone, scales each part of a portfolio - e.g., stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities - so that its contribution to net portfolio risk matches its budgeted risk. Because contributions are measured using a point-estimate of covariance, the method is subject to problems of estimation error. Presented is a way to solve risk parity with covariance modeled as uncertain in order to achieve a weighting robust to changes in regime and hidden risks from misperceived hedging.
Having wide application outside of risk parity are the uncertain contributions calculated en route. Reporting a portfolio's "uncertain risk decomposition" reveals the range around numbers and, more important, the risks that arise from being wrong, e.g., market's going from invisible to the biggest latent risk in a seemingly beta-hedged long-short portfolio.
Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learningDanbi Cho
The presentation describes the AI bias with adversarial learning.
It includes the AI Fairness 360 open source by IBM.
I presented this paper in the natural language processing lab as an undergraduate research assistant.
(July 9th, 2019)
Asset Pricing and Portfolio Theory
I have presented a unique analysis which showcases the concepts of Aggregate & Aggregate lending and the numerical aspects of CAPM theory
Risk and Return: Portfolio Theory and Assets Pricing ModelsPANKAJ PANDEY
Discuss the concepts of portfolio risk and return.
Determine the relationship between risk and return of portfolios.
Highlight the difference between systematic and unsystematic risks.
Examine the logic of portfolio theory .
Show the use of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) in the valuation of securities.
Explain the features and modus operandi of the arbitrage pricing theory (APT).
Risk Measurement From Theory to Practice: Is Your Risk Metric Coherent and Em...amadei77
I present desirable features for a risk metric, incorporating the coherent risk framework and empirical features of markets. I argue that a desirable risk metric is one that is coherent and focused on measuring tail losses, which significantly affect investment performance. I evaluate 5 risk metrics: volatility, semi-standard deviation, downside deviation, Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR). I demonstrate that CVaR is the only coherent risk metric explicitly focused on measuring tail losses, which are an important, empirical feature of markets. CVaR is the most practically useful risk metric for an investor interested in minimizing declines in the value of a portfolio at stress points while maximizing returns. Through several examples, I demonstrate that the choice of a risk metric may lead to very different portfolios and investment performance due to differences in investment selection, portfolio construction and risk management. I also demonstrate that the focus on tail losses as opposed to volatility results in superior performance - much smaller declines in value at stress points with improvements in average and cumulative returns; similar results can be achieved with other risk metrics, which are not designed to measure tail losses like CVaR Based on empirical data, practical recommendations for investment analysis, portfolio construction and risk management are included throughout the article.
Optimal Risky Asset Proportion in the Presence of correlated Background RriskTakafumi SHIRATORI
This study derives the optimal investment proportion for financial assets in the presence of background risk by maximization of expected utility in a single period framework. To simplify the problem, I assume that there exist only two financial assets, one risky and one risk free. The optimal proportion says that she should increase her exposure to financial risky asset when financial risky asset and background risk is negatively correlated. This paper is the first analysis to derive this surprising result. Under such a situation, to increase exposure to financial risky asset is optimal even if there exists background risk.
I obtained Master of Business Administration of Waseda University Graduated School with this study in 2012. I researched under Dr. Masayuki Ikeda.
Agent-based economic modeling often requires the determination of an initial equilibrium price vector. Calculating this directly requires algorithms of exponential computational complexity. It is known that a partial equilibrium price can be estimated using a median of trades. This paper explores the possibility of a multivariate generalization of this technique using depth functions.
Risk Parity, a relatively new portfolio construction method, took Wall Street by storm overcoming the traditional mean-variance and 60/40 methods. Why this method is better and when?
Asset Pricing and Portfolio Theory
I have presented a unique analysis which showcases the concepts of Aggregate & Aggregate lending and the numerical aspects of CAPM theory
Similar to Measuring the behavioral component of financial fluctuaction. An analysis based on the S&P 500 - Caporin M., Corazzini L., Costola M. - November 8, 2013.
Risk and Return: Portfolio Theory and Assets Pricing ModelsPANKAJ PANDEY
Discuss the concepts of portfolio risk and return.
Determine the relationship between risk and return of portfolios.
Highlight the difference between systematic and unsystematic risks.
Examine the logic of portfolio theory .
Show the use of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) in the valuation of securities.
Explain the features and modus operandi of the arbitrage pricing theory (APT).
Risk Measurement From Theory to Practice: Is Your Risk Metric Coherent and Em...amadei77
I present desirable features for a risk metric, incorporating the coherent risk framework and empirical features of markets. I argue that a desirable risk metric is one that is coherent and focused on measuring tail losses, which significantly affect investment performance. I evaluate 5 risk metrics: volatility, semi-standard deviation, downside deviation, Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR). I demonstrate that CVaR is the only coherent risk metric explicitly focused on measuring tail losses, which are an important, empirical feature of markets. CVaR is the most practically useful risk metric for an investor interested in minimizing declines in the value of a portfolio at stress points while maximizing returns. Through several examples, I demonstrate that the choice of a risk metric may lead to very different portfolios and investment performance due to differences in investment selection, portfolio construction and risk management. I also demonstrate that the focus on tail losses as opposed to volatility results in superior performance - much smaller declines in value at stress points with improvements in average and cumulative returns; similar results can be achieved with other risk metrics, which are not designed to measure tail losses like CVaR Based on empirical data, practical recommendations for investment analysis, portfolio construction and risk management are included throughout the article.
Optimal Risky Asset Proportion in the Presence of correlated Background RriskTakafumi SHIRATORI
This study derives the optimal investment proportion for financial assets in the presence of background risk by maximization of expected utility in a single period framework. To simplify the problem, I assume that there exist only two financial assets, one risky and one risk free. The optimal proportion says that she should increase her exposure to financial risky asset when financial risky asset and background risk is negatively correlated. This paper is the first analysis to derive this surprising result. Under such a situation, to increase exposure to financial risky asset is optimal even if there exists background risk.
I obtained Master of Business Administration of Waseda University Graduated School with this study in 2012. I researched under Dr. Masayuki Ikeda.
Agent-based economic modeling often requires the determination of an initial equilibrium price vector. Calculating this directly requires algorithms of exponential computational complexity. It is known that a partial equilibrium price can be estimated using a median of trades. This paper explores the possibility of a multivariate generalization of this technique using depth functions.
Risk Parity, a relatively new portfolio construction method, took Wall Street by storm overcoming the traditional mean-variance and 60/40 methods. Why this method is better and when?
In this paper, the black-litterman model is introduced to quantify investor’s views, then we expanded
the safety-first portfolio model under the case that the distribution of risk assets return is ambiguous. When
short-selling of risk-free assets is allowed, the model is transformed into a second-order cone optimization
problem with investor views. The ambiguity set parameters are calibrated through programming
Similar to Measuring the behavioral component of financial fluctuaction. An analysis based on the S&P 500 - Caporin M., Corazzini L., Costola M. - November 8, 2013. (20)
Predicting the economic public opinions in EuropeSYRTO Project
Predicting the economic public opinions in Europe
Maurizio Carpita, Enrico Ciavolino, Mariangela Nitti
University of Brescia & University of Salento
SYRTO Project Final Conference, Paris – February 19, 2016
Scalable inference for a full multivariate stochastic volatilitySYRTO Project
Scalable inference for a full multivariate stochastic volatility
P. Dellaportas, A. Plataniotis and M. Titsias UCL(London), AUEB(Athens), AUEB(Athens)
Final SYRTO Conference - Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
February 19, 2016
Network and risk spillovers: a multivariate GARCH perspectiveSYRTO Project
M. Billio, M. Caporin, L. Frattarolo, L. Pelizzon: “Network and risk spillovers: a multivariate GARCH perspective”.
Final SYRTO Conference - Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
February 19, 2016
Clustering in dynamic causal networks as a measure of systemic risk on the eu...SYRTO Project
Clustering in dynamic causal networks as a measure of systemic risk on the euro zone
M. Billio, H. Gatfaoui, L. Frattarolo, P. de Peretti
IESEG/ Universitè Paris1 Panthèon-Sorbonne/ University Ca' Foscari
Final SYRTO Conference - Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
February 19, 2016
Entropy and systemic risk measures
M. Billio, R. Casarin, M. Costola, A. Pasqualini
Ca’ Foscari Venice University
Final SYRTO Conference - Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
February 19, 2016
Results of the SYRTO Project
Roberto Savona - Primary Coordinator of the SYRTO Project
University of Brescia
Final SYRTO Conference - Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
February 19, 2016
Comment on:Risk Dynamics in the Eurozone: A New Factor Model forSovereign C...SYRTO Project
Comment on:Risk Dynamics in the Eurozone: A New Factor Model forSovereign CDS and Equity Returnsby Dellaportas, Meligkotsidou, Savona, Vrontos. Andre Lucas. Amsterda, June, 25 2015. Spillover Dynamics for Systemic Risk Measurement Using Spatial Financial Time Series Models. Andre Lucas. Amsterdam - June, 25 2015. European Financial Management Association 2015 Annual Meetings.
Spillover Dynamics for Systemic Risk Measurement Using Spatial Financial Time...SYRTO Project
Spillover Dynamics for Systemic Risk Measurement Using Spatial Financial Time Series Models. Andre Lucas. Amsterdam - June, 25 2015. European Financial Management Association 2015 Annual Meetings.
Discussion of “Network Connectivity and Systematic Risk” and “The Impact of N...SYRTO Project
Discussion of “Network Connectivity and Systematic Risk” and “The Impact of Network Connectivity on Factor Exposures, Asset pricing and Portfolio Diversification” by Billio, Caporin, Panzica and Pelizzon. Arjen Siegmann. Amsterdam - June, 25 2015. European Financial Management Association 2015 Annual Meetings.
Spillover dynamics for sistemic risk measurement using spatial financial time...SYRTO Project
Spillover dynamics for sistemic risk measurement using spatial financial time series models. Julia Schaumburg, Andre Lucas, Siem Jan Koopman, and Francisco Blasques. ESEM - Toulouse, August 25-29, 2014
http://www.eea-esem.com/eea-esem/2014/prog/viewpaper.asp?pid=1044
Sovereign credit risk, liquidity, and the ecb intervention: deus ex machina? ...SYRTO Project
Sovereign credit risk, liquidity, and the ecb intervention: deus ex machina? - Loriana Pelizzon, Marti Subrahmanyam, Davide Tomio, Jun Uno. June, 5 2014. First International Conference on Sovereign Bond Markets.
Turin Startup Ecosystem 2024 - Ricerca sulle Startup e il Sistema dell'Innov...Quotidiano Piemontese
Turin Startup Ecosystem 2024
Una ricerca de il Club degli Investitori, in collaborazione con ToTeM Torino Tech Map e con il supporto della ESCP Business School e di Growth Capital
USDA Loans in California: A Comprehensive Overview.pptxmarketing367770
USDA Loans in California: A Comprehensive Overview
If you're dreaming of owning a home in California's rural or suburban areas, a USDA loan might be the perfect solution. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) offers these loans to help low-to-moderate-income individuals and families achieve homeownership.
Key Features of USDA Loans:
Zero Down Payment: USDA loans require no down payment, making homeownership more accessible.
Competitive Interest Rates: These loans often come with lower interest rates compared to conventional loans.
Flexible Credit Requirements: USDA loans have more lenient credit score requirements, helping those with less-than-perfect credit.
Guaranteed Loan Program: The USDA guarantees a portion of the loan, reducing risk for lenders and expanding borrowing options.
Eligibility Criteria:
Location: The property must be located in a USDA-designated rural or suburban area. Many areas in California qualify.
Income Limits: Applicants must meet income guidelines, which vary by region and household size.
Primary Residence: The home must be used as the borrower's primary residence.
Application Process:
Find a USDA-Approved Lender: Not all lenders offer USDA loans, so it's essential to choose one approved by the USDA.
Pre-Qualification: Determine your eligibility and the amount you can borrow.
Property Search: Look for properties in eligible rural or suburban areas.
Loan Application: Submit your application, including financial and personal information.
Processing and Approval: The lender and USDA will review your application. If approved, you can proceed to closing.
USDA loans are an excellent option for those looking to buy a home in California's rural and suburban areas. With no down payment and flexible requirements, these loans make homeownership more attainable for many families. Explore your eligibility today and take the first step toward owning your dream home.
how to sell pi coins in South Korea profitably.DOT TECH
Yes. You can sell your pi network coins in South Korea or any other country, by finding a verified pi merchant
What is a verified pi merchant?
Since pi network is not launched yet on any exchange, the only way you can sell pi coins is by selling to a verified pi merchant, and this is because pi network is not launched yet on any exchange and no pre-sale or ico offerings Is done on pi.
Since there is no pre-sale, the only way exchanges can get pi is by buying from miners. So a pi merchant facilitates these transactions by acting as a bridge for both transactions.
How can i find a pi vendor/merchant?
Well for those who haven't traded with a pi merchant or who don't already have one. I will leave the telegram id of my personal pi merchant who i trade pi with.
Tele gram: @Pi_vendor_247
#pi #sell #nigeria #pinetwork #picoins #sellpi #Nigerian #tradepi #pinetworkcoins #sellmypi
Introduction to Indian Financial System ()Avanish Goel
The financial system of a country is an important tool for economic development of the country, as it helps in creation of wealth by linking savings with investments.
It facilitates the flow of funds form the households (savers) to business firms (investors) to aid in wealth creation and development of both the parties
What price will pi network be listed on exchangesDOT TECH
The rate at which pi will be listed is practically unknown. But due to speculations surrounding it the predicted rate is tends to be from 30$ — 50$.
So if you are interested in selling your pi network coins at a high rate tho. Or you can't wait till the mainnet launch in 2026. You can easily trade your pi coins with a merchant.
A merchant is someone who buys pi coins from miners and resell them to Investors looking forward to hold massive quantities till mainnet launch.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi vendor to trade with.
@Pi_vendor_247
Even tho Pi network is not listed on any exchange yet.
Buying/Selling or investing in pi network coins is highly possible through the help of vendors. You can buy from vendors[ buy directly from the pi network miners and resell it]. I will leave the telegram contact of my personal vendor.
@Pi_vendor_247
what is the best method to sell pi coins in 2024DOT TECH
The best way to sell your pi coins safely is trading with an exchange..but since pi is not launched in any exchange, and second option is through a VERIFIED pi merchant.
Who is a pi merchant?
A pi merchant is someone who buys pi coins from miners and pioneers and resell them to Investors looking forward to hold massive amounts before mainnet launch in 2026.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant to trade pi coins with.
@Pi_vendor_247
Exploring Abhay Bhutada’s Views After Poonawalla Fincorp’s Collaboration With...beulahfernandes8
The financial landscape in India has witnessed a significant development with the recent collaboration between Poonawalla Fincorp and IndusInd Bank.
The launch of the co-branded credit card, the IndusInd Bank Poonawalla Fincorp eLITE RuPay Platinum Credit Card, marks a major milestone for both entities.
This strategic move aims to redefine and elevate the banking experience for customers.
how to sell pi coins effectively (from 50 - 100k pi)DOT TECH
Anywhere in the world, including Africa, America, and Europe, you can sell Pi Network Coins online and receive cash through online payment options.
Pi has not yet been launched on any exchange because we are currently using the confined Mainnet. The planned launch date for Pi is June 28, 2026.
Reselling to investors who want to hold until the mainnet launch in 2026 is currently the sole way to sell.
Consequently, right now. All you need to do is select the right pi network provider.
Who is a pi merchant?
An individual who buys coins from miners on the pi network and resells them to investors hoping to hang onto them until the mainnet is launched is known as a pi merchant.
debuts.
I'll provide you the Telegram username
@Pi_vendor_247
BYD SWOT Analysis and In-Depth Insights 2024.pptxmikemetalprod
Indepth analysis of the BYD 2024
BYD (Build Your Dreams) is a Chinese automaker and battery manufacturer that has snowballed over the past two decades to become a significant player in electric vehicles and global clean energy technology.
This SWOT analysis examines BYD's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats as it competes in the fast-changing automotive and energy storage industries.
Founded in 1995 and headquartered in Shenzhen, BYD started as a battery company before expanding into automobiles in the early 2000s.
Initially manufacturing gasoline-powered vehicles, BYD focused on plug-in hybrid and fully electric vehicles, leveraging its expertise in battery technology.
Today, BYD is the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer, delivering over 1.2 million electric cars globally. The company also produces electric buses, trucks, forklifts, and rail transit.
On the energy side, BYD is a major supplier of rechargeable batteries for cell phones, laptops, electric vehicles, and energy storage systems.
how to sell pi coins in all Africa Countries.DOT TECH
Yes. You can sell your pi network for other cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, usdt , Ethereum and other currencies And this is done easily with the help from a pi merchant.
What is a pi merchant ?
Since pi is not launched yet in any exchange. The only way you can sell right now is through merchants.
A verified Pi merchant is someone who buys pi network coins from miners and resell them to investors looking forward to hold massive quantities of pi coins before mainnet launch in 2026.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant to trade with.
@Pi_vendor_247
Poonawalla Fincorp and IndusInd Bank Introduce New Co-Branded Credit Cardnickysharmasucks
The unveiling of the IndusInd Bank Poonawalla Fincorp eLITE RuPay Platinum Credit Card marks a notable milestone in the Indian financial landscape, showcasing a successful partnership between two leading institutions, Poonawalla Fincorp and IndusInd Bank. This co-branded credit card not only offers users a plethora of benefits but also reflects a commitment to innovation and adaptation. With a focus on providing value-driven and customer-centric solutions, this launch represents more than just a new product—it signifies a step towards redefining the banking experience for millions. Promising convenience, rewards, and a touch of luxury in everyday financial transactions, this collaboration aims to cater to the evolving needs of customers and set new standards in the industry.
The European Unemployment Puzzle: implications from population agingGRAPE
We study the link between the evolving age structure of the working population and unemployment. We build a large new Keynesian OLG model with a realistic age structure, labor market frictions, sticky prices, and aggregate shocks. Once calibrated to the European economy, we quantify the extent to which demographic changes over the last three decades have contributed to the decline of the unemployment rate. Our findings yield important implications for the future evolution of unemployment given the anticipated further aging of the working population in Europe. We also quantify the implications for optimal monetary policy: lowering inflation volatility becomes less costly in terms of GDP and unemployment volatility, which hints that optimal monetary policy may be more hawkish in an aging society. Finally, our results also propose a partial reversal of the European-US unemployment puzzle due to the fact that the share of young workers is expected to remain robust in the US.
how can i use my minded pi coins I need some funds.DOT TECH
If you are interested in selling your pi coins, i have a verified pi merchant, who buys pi coins and resell them to exchanges looking forward to hold till mainnet launch.
Because the core team has announced that pi network will not be doing any pre-sale. The only way exchanges like huobi, bitmart and hotbit can get pi is by buying from miners.
Now a merchant stands in between these exchanges and the miners. As a link to make transactions smooth. Because right now in the enclosed mainnet you can't sell pi coins your self. You need the help of a merchant,
i will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant below. 👇 I and my friends has traded more than 3000pi coins with him successfully.
@Pi_vendor_247
Webinar Exploring DORA for Fintechs - Simont Braun
Measuring the behavioral component of financial fluctuaction. An analysis based on the S&P 500 - Caporin M., Corazzini L., Costola M. - November 8, 2013.
1. Measuring the behavioral
component of financial
fluctuaction. An analysis
based on the S&P 500.
SYstemic Risk TOmography:
Signals, Measurements, Transmission Channels, and
Policy Interventions
M.Caporin, University ofPadova (Italy)
L. Corazzini, University of Padova (Italy)
M. Costola,Ca'Foscari University ofVenice (Italy)
ASSET 2013– Bilbao(ES).November8, 2013.
2. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Measuring the behavioral component
of financial fluctuations:
An analysis based on the S&P500.
Massimiliano Caporin Luca Corazzini Michele Costola
Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
Asset 2013, Bilbao.
3. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The Framework
We consider two agents in the market:
√
an agent with classical risk averse utility from EUT
√
an agent equipped with a S-shaped-like utility function introduced by
Kahneman and Tversky (1979)
Each agent acts according to her own utility function (no
interactions between the agents)
The preferences of the two agents are expressed in terms of
performance measures respectively related to the maximization of
their utility functions (optimizing agents)
Given the two types of utility function, a different behavior of the
two agents is expected solely on the losses (e.g high volatility in the
financial markets)
The market is composed by these two types of investors
4. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The Framework/2
Market
Rational investor Behavioral investor
Method
Blend in a Bayesian manner the two components through a
weighting factor which monitors the relevance of behavioral
expectations
CRITERION: Estimate the optimal weighting factor which is
maximized from the past cumulative return of a k-asset portfolio.
The weighing factor is time varying (rolling evaluation)
5. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Behavioral Finance
Different type of agents are distinguished in base of the expectations they
have about the future asset prices, Hommes (2006).
Traditional Paradigm: agents are rational.
⇒ Bayes’ law (they update their belief correctly),
⇒ they are consistent with Savage’s notion of subjective expected
utility.
i
u(xi )P(xi ).
Behavioral finance argues some financial phenomena can be
explained using models where agents are not fully rational.
⇒ mistaken beliefs, they fail to update their beliefs correctly (bad
Bayesians).
(Overconfidence, Optimism, Representativeness, Convervatism,
Anchoring...)
⇒ different preferences (e.g. loss aversion).
We consider at this purpose an agent with loss aversion.
6. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Loss Aversion at the level of the individual stocks
Barberis et al. (2001) shows that an economy where investors are loss
averse over the fluctuations of individual stocks reflects more empirical
phenomena w.r.t an economy where investors are loss averse over the
fluctuations of their stock portfolio.
Firm level returns have a high mean, are excessively volatile, and are
predictable in the time series using lagged variables,
the premium to value stocks and to stocks with poor prior returns,
cross-sectional facts: the discount rate is function of the past
performance returns.
7. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
CARA vs S-shaped Behavioral investor
CARA utility
(rational investor)
S-shaped Behavioral utility
(behavioral investor)
Generalized Sharpe-ratioa
Z-ratiob
Maximum
Principle
Optimal allocation between a risky
and a risk free asset in one period
horizon.
The solution is an increasing func-
tion of a quantity that can be inter-
preted as a performance measurec
.
Optimal allocation between a risky
and a risk free asset in one period
horizon.
The solution is an increasing func-
tion of a quantity that can be inter-
preted as a performance measurec
.
aZakamouline and Koekebakker (2009a).
bZakamouline(2011).
c Pedersen and Satchel (2002).
8. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The risk-adverse agent
The optimal decision rule for a rational investor is based on E(U) where
her risk-aversion is given by the concavity property of her wealth function.
The CARA utility function has been widely used in the financial literature,
U(W ) = −e−λW
(1)
where λ represents the coefficient of risk aversion and W the investor’s
wealth.
9. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The Sharpe ratio
The Maximum Principle
Consider the wealth w of the investor at the begin of a period t0.
In particular,
a, wealth allocated in the risky asset x,
w − a, wealth allocated in the riskless asset.
At the end of the period t1 the investor’s wealth will be,
˜w = a × (1 + x) + (w − a) × (1 + rf ) = a × (x − rf ) + w × (1 + rf ) (2)
The investor’s objective,
max
a
E[U( ˜w)]. (3)
Therefore it will be,
E[U∗
( ˜w)] = E[−e−λ[a(x−rf )+w(1+rf )]
] = E[−e−λ[a(x−rf )]
× e−λw(1+rf )
q
]
(4)
where a∗
is independent from the initial wealth of the investor.
10. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The Sharpe ratio
We can approximate the expected utility using the Taylor’s series.
Intuitively,
E[U( ˜w)] = −1 + aλE(x − rf ) −
λ2
2
a2
E(x − rf )2
+ O( ˜w3
) (5)
If we approximate up to the first two derivatives, the FOC is given by:
∂E[U( ˜w)]
∂a
= λE(x − rf ) − λ2
E(x − rf )2
a = 0 (6)
and the quantity that maximizes the expected utility function is
proportional to the Sharpe Ratio,
a∗
=
1
λ
µ − rf
σ2
=
1
λ
SR
σ
. (7)
11. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Generalized Sharpe Ratio
The Sharpe Ratio
the quantity that maximizes the expected utility function,
when there is a departure from Gaussianity, the ratio begins to be
biased both in the measurement and in the ranking among the
assets, Gatfaoui (2009).
Zakamouline et al. (2009a) derived a Generalized Sharpe Ratio (GSR)
E[U∗
( ˜w)] = −e− 1
2 GSR2
. (8)
The GSR is estimated using from expected utility (evaluated using a
kernel function to recover the returns density)
1
2
GSR2
= −log(−E[U∗
( ˜w)]). (9)
The GSR takes into account the whole distribution of the risky asset x
and not two moments only, and GSR → SR, when x
d
→ X ∼ N(µ, σ2
).
12. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The S-shaped Utility Function
A behavioural investor is a decision maker that discriminates an
outcome above and below a reference point (gains and losses).
This value function is concave in the gains and convex in the losses,
the decision maker is risk adverse in the outcome above the
reference point and risk seeker below.
Kahneman and Tversky (1979) introduced the S-shaped utility
function starting from the evaluation of choices made by individuals
over alternative lotteries
13. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The Generalized a behavioral utility function
Zakamouline(2011) has introduced a generalized behavioural utility
function (piecewise linear plus power utility)
U(W ) =
(W − W0) − (γ+/α)(W − W0)α
, if W ≥ W0,
−λ(W0 − W ) + (γ−/β)(W0 − W )β
), if W < W0,
where
γ+ and γ− are real numbers,
λ > 0, α > 0 and β > 0 are parameters.
This utility function is continuous and increasing in wealth with the
existence of the first and second derivatives on the investor’s wealth.
14. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The Z-Ratio
The author derives the performance measure which maximizes the utility
function,
Zγ−,γ+,λ,β =
E(x) − r − (1−(W − W0)λ − 1)LPM1(x, r)
β
γ+UPMβ(x, r) + λγ−LPMβ(x, r)
where x is the returns series of the asset and r is set to the risk–free rate.
LPM and UPM are respectively the lower and upper partial moments,
LPMn(x, r) =
r
−∞
(r − x)n
dFx (x),
UPMn(x, r) =
∞
r
(x − r)n
dFx (x),
where n is the order of the partial moment of x at the threshold r and
Fx (·) is the distribution function of x.
15. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The utility function
A possible alternative is the utility function by Kahneman and Tversky
(1979),
(W − W0)α
if W ≥ W0,
−λ(W0 − W )β
if W < W0.
the investor with this utility exhibits loss aversion in the sense of
Kahneman and Tversky (1979) when λ > 1, α = β
−U(W0 − ∆W ) > U(W0 + ∆W ), ∀∆W > 0,
! As stressed by Zakamouline (2011) the existence of the z–ratio
requires β > α which implies no loss aversion in the utility.
We might consider loss aversion in a local sense defined by
K¨obberling and Wakker (2005) around the reference point.
λ =
U (W0−)
U (W0+)
,
when λ > 1, the investor exhibits loss aversion.
16. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Agents choices
Agents’ preferences are obtained from the maximization of their
utility functions;
What they do:
They rank the M assets at the univariate level and then allocate
their wealth on a subset of them, the K best performing assets
Agents are not making choices directly at the portfolio level, but
then they allocate their wealth on a portfolio
Agents are not estimating the portfolio weights (i.e MV) but allocate
their wealth over the K assets with equal weights
This might be a simplification, but
Impact of different values of K is evaluated (K is not estimated)
The EW strategy outperforms in-sample out-of-sample optimized
portfolios, DeMiguel et al. (2009) and Duchin and Levy (2009).
17. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Agents choices and the market
Our purpose is to focus on the entire market, as influenced by the
choices made by the two types of agents
We take thus the market point of view, or the view of an imaginary
optimizing agent willing to take investment decisions accounting for
both rational and behavioral points of view (with the same
allocation scheme adopted by rational/behavioral)
The question is: how much should I have trusted behavioral/rational
views to allocate my portfolio in the optimal way?
We thus introduce a framework where a parameter allows us to
monitor the relevance of behavioral choices (it will not be a relative
weight of behavioral agents nor the relative weight of behavioral
rankings over rational rankings)
At the market level we act starting from a rational point of view, in
such a way the impact of behavioral choices might be null in a
limiting case
18. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The Bayesian Approach
The purpose of the model is to blend the selection of the assets coming
from a rational investor among an investment universe by conditioning it
according a behavioural component. The evaluation is performed in
terms of utility at the single asset level
Aggregated Measure
(Posterior)
Rational investor
(Prior)
Behavioral investor
(Conditional)
Generalized Sharpe-ratio Z-ratio
19. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The Prior and the Conditional
Agents’ preferences
Agents are making asset ranks on the basis of the expected value of their
performance measure; under the assumption that this performance
measure for asset i follows
PMi ∼ iid(µi , δ2
i ). (10)
agents are making ranks on the basis of ˆµi .
Rational agents evaluate µ on sample data and under the estimated
GSR, they consider the following prior density
P (µi ) ∼ N GSRi , σ2
i (11)
Alternatively µi = GSRi + εi with V [εi ] = σ2
i
20. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The Prior and the Conditional
Behavioral agents, the conditional distribution, evaluate providing a
different point of view on µ, that is
P (µi ) ∼ N ˆZi , ω2
i (12)
or, µi = ˆZi + ηi with V [ηi ] = ω2
i , and ranks based on ˆZi
21. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The Prior and the Conditional
We further assume that εi and ηi are independent and that the
variance of εi is multiplied by a factor τ representing the degree of
confidence on the prior density
i
ηi
∼ N 0,
τσ2
i 0
0 ω2
i
(13)
In empirical evaluations, the parameters σ2
i and ω2
i are replaced by
their estimates, at the single asset level, obtained by bootstrap
methods
We have now all the elements to derive the posterior density for the
expected optimal performance measure at the market level; two
possible approaches: Bayesian approach or Theil Mixed Estimation;
both lead to the same result.
22. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The Posterior
To aggregated expectations of behavioral and rational agents we
follow the Bayes theorem and determine the posterior density whose
mean µP
i and variance Mp
i are given as
µp
i = (τσ2
i )−1
+ (ω2
i )−1 −1
(τσ2
i )−1
GSR + (ω2
i )−1 ˆZi
Mp
i = (τσ2
i )−1
+ (ω2
i )−1 −1
.
(14)
In this framework µp
i represents the aggregated performance
measure coming from a mixture of the two type of agents; this
measure can be used at the market level to take investment
decisions, based on asset ranks (on µp
i )
However, asset ranks, to be computed, requires the evaluation of
one element: τ.
23. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The estimation of τ∗
We determine τ by maximizing the following criterion function,
max
τ
f (τ) =
1
m
t
l=t−m+1
1
K
j∈At (τ)
rj,l
(15)
where:
At (τ) is the set of the K assets with highest score of the aggregate
measure µp
i ; rp,l = 1
K j∈At (τ) rj,l is the time l return of the equally
weighted portfolio over the assets included in At (τ),
The criterion function is the average return of the portfolio over last
m observations
Risk is not introduced in the criterion function to have an
investment strategy similar to that of the rational/behavioral agents
where risk is evaluated at the single asset level and enters only in the
performance measures and thus in the ranks (which are
risk-adjusted)
24. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The interpretation of τ∗
The purpose is to estimate τ∗
for the aggregated measure µp
i
according the criterion function which optimizes the cumulative
return of K assets.
That is, we want to check for which value of τ∗
we would have
obtained the optimal cumulative return of a portfolio with K assets
for a given period.
In fact, a higher value of τ∗
would imply that the investor should
have correct her action towards a behavioral direction.
Conversely, a low value of τ∗
would imply that the investor should
have remained on her prior rational ranks.
Therefore, with the criterion function we are detecting the relative
importance of the behavioral choices over the rational ones.
τ∗
is in some sense related to impact of behavioral choices on the
market fluctuations in a given moment.
25. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The dataset and the Model Settings
We consider the constituents at a given time t of the S&P500 from
January 1962 to February 2012 at a monthly frequency (source
CRSP/COMPUSTAT)
The model has been applied on rolling windows of 60 monthly
returns (shorter evaluation windows provide more noisy and volatile
evaluations of the performance measures)
Thus, we selected from the constituents of the S&P500 at a given t
solely the assets with at least 60 observations.
The variance of the measures is obtained using a block bootstrap
procedure (dimension of blocks 4).
We initially select K = 100 to reflect the dimension of a stock index
as S&P100 (which is equally weighted).
26. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The filtered τ∗
To smooth the optimized τ∗
we filtered it with a local level model
τ∗
t = µt + t, t ∼ NID(0, σ2
)
µt+1 = µt + ξt, ξt ∼ NID(0, σ2
ξ)
(16)
µt is the unobserved level for t = 1, . . . , n,
t is the observation disturbance and ξt is the level disturbance a
time t.
For the investor equipped with an utility function similar to Kahneman
and Tversky (1979), we estimated ˆt ∼ NID(0, .4547) and
ˆξt ∼ NID(0, .001678).
27. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The filtered τ∗
Figure: The bands represent the Economic Recessions according NBER.
28. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
The filtered τ∗
/2
Figure: The bands represent the Financial Crisis in the US based on
Kindleberfer and Aliber (2005).
29. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
τ∗
and investor sentiment
Our estimate of the confidence on rational priors can be linked to
the literature of market sentiment indices
Market sentiment indices monitor the general view on the market,
i.e. bullish/bearish
Moreover, sentiment indices can have a behavioral
component/interpretation
Linking the τ∗
to sentiment indices allows verifying how much
behavioral views are related to the evolution of market sentiment,
with an expected positive relation
Several indices of market sentiment: VIX (fear index), volume,
liquidity, and other (Baker and Wurgler, 2007)
30. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Market sentiments and Economic indicators
Our factor τ,
⇒ can be interpreted as a quantity associated to agent’s overall
behaviour in period of market stress.
⇒ We can relate its evolution to other indicators that monitor the level
of financial stress,
FSIs capture the key features of market stress: i.e increases
uncertainty about fundamental value of asset, increased uncertainty
about behavior of other investors, increased information asymmetry,
Sentiment indicator (Baker and Wurgler, 2007),
NBER recessions (dummy),
Liquidity indicator (Paster and Stambaugh, 2001),
Industrial Production.
31. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Regression Analysis
32. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Regression Analysis
33. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Regression Analysis
34. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Regression Analysis
35. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Regression Analysis
36. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Regression Analysis
37. Intro Literature Review The rational agent The Behavioral agent The Model Empirical Analysis τ∗ and investor sentiment Conclusion
Conclusion
We estimated a time varying weighting factor on the S&P500
according on the maximization on the cumulative returns.
We found some interesting similarities between the local
maxima/minima of the estimated factor and economic recessions
(NBER) and financial crisis.
We found a relationship with the financial sentiment and other
economic indicators when analysing the relation between our
estimated parameter and sentiment indices
We can consider our indicator as a possible endogenous market
sentiment index.
Robustness checks: analyses on the role of K and with an
“opposite” utility function.
Use τ as a pricing factor at single-asset level or for macro-sector.
38. This project has received funding from the European Union’s
Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological
development and demonstration under grant agreement n° 320270
www.syrtoproject.eu