The document discusses methods for optimizing integration between production and facilities to maximize profits while handling different drilling schedules and artificial lift strategies. It emphasizes the importance of designing facilities that can accommodate variable production levels to sustain economics with oil prices below $80 per barrel. Key recommendations include executing cost-effective and schedule-driven facilities, targeting 99% uptime through preventative maintenance and redundancy, right-sizing facilities to avoid underutilization or excess capacity, and engaging operations teams for feedback to prioritize issues.
1. Sarah Tamilarasan
Carrizo Oil & Gas
Maximizing Profits Through Facilities
Analyzing Methods For Optimizing Integration Between Production & Facilities
To Design Facilities Capable Of Handling Different Drilling Schedules &
Artificial Lift Strategies Whilst Maximizing Profitability
2. Why is it important?
BOPD of Shale
wells
Drill schedules,
acreage position
Sustain economics
oil prices < $80/bbl
3. How can we do this?
Execute
Cost /
Schedule
driven
Facilities
Target 99% uptime
Facilities
driven by
Acreage,
Drill/Frac
strategy, IP
rates
6. Drill/Frac Schedule
• Typically 1-3 wells, Max 2000 bbls/day
• Consider adding trains based on
frequency of rig
Lease holding
or Pilot wells
• Depends on size of acreage, typically
5,000-10,000 bbls/day
• Acreage position might not be continuous
Acreage
development
• Facility size should be driven by IP rates
• IP rates for 2, 3 or 8 wells vary
considerably. 1000-4000 bbls/day
Wells on a
pad?
7. Operator Friendly Facilities
• Can it be supported by the Operations team
efficiently?
• Have equipment that might be bypassed?
Engineering
Design
• Easy to trouble shoot and diagnose operational
issues. Get buy in from Operations during design
phase
Trouble
shoot
• Example: Consider (2) 48” separators to
process 4000 bbls/day vs (4) 36” separators
• Example: Dual dumps, 2” vs 3” dumps
Maximize
Utility
8. 5000
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
BarrelsofoilperMonth
Month
Oil
Oil2
Undersized Facility
Loss of approx. $180,000
per Facility
• Undersized facilities curtail production,
retention time
• Oversized – increases possibility of gas
entering tanks
Facilities
Undersized?
Oversized?
9. Advantages of 25% additional capacity
• Well produce at rates higher than
expected
Well Production
exceeds projections
• Accommodates slug flow
• Slugs level out with the dual
separators
Well flow
• With Production declines, additional
wells can be accommodated with
existing facilities
Accommodates
changes in
drilling/completions
13. Get an advantage on cost
Buy in from onsite
team, vendors
• Materials 30% lower than
industry
Research/Implement
cost effective design
• Wireless I&E 150k vs.
700k savings over 78%
Increase
productivity
• Construction – 600k vs
2M-3M, 80% savings
14. Tips to control Costs/Schedule
Forecast materials 6-10 months in advance
Minimize/eliminate changes in the field by combining design/Hazop
reviews. Rework can lead up to additional 2M in labor
Practice SIMOPS - i.e. Flow lines/Facilities in place prior to Frac
ROW requests to Land 45-60 days in advance
16. Reduce Downtime
• Production declines, compressors might need to be
downsized to keep wells online
• Consider routing additional wells to existing facilities to
maintain retention time
Evaluate
Facilities 3-6
months
• Periodic pigging will keep the flow lines/gas line in
operation
• Build in redundancy
• Scheduled testing pnuematic systems, I&E equipment
Implement
Maintenance
program
• Get feedback from field operations
• Make required design changes to resolve reoccurring
operational issues
• Roll out custom solutions
Prioritize
Operational
issues
Low Bopd, 500, compared to 5,000 Middle East onshore
Sharp decline curves, companies target payout within 12 months of each well
Analysts predict shale wells might not be predicable oil prices $50/bbl
Drill/completions strategy, Acreage position, drilling 1 well vs 7-8 wells, movement of the rigs, frequency of rigs on a block