Martin Lewis and Stephen Pinfield Research Data Management - where should collaboration happen
•
1 like•1,697 views
This document discusses where collaboration on research data management (RDM) should occur. It describes potential spaces for RDM collaboration at the interplanetary, international, national, regional, and institutional levels. At the institutional level, the key components of an RDM program are identified as strategies, policies, guidelines, processes, technologies, and services. Drivers for RDM, influencing factors, and stakeholders are also discussed. Challenges to collaboration mentioned include developing a shared national vision to avoid a divided support system, and overcoming territorial and identity issues within institutions.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (10)
Similar to Martin Lewis and Stephen Pinfield Research Data Management - where should collaboration happen
Similar to Martin Lewis and Stephen Pinfield Research Data Management - where should collaboration happen (20)
More from Jisc
More from Jisc (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Martin Lewis and Stephen Pinfield Research Data Management - where should collaboration happen
- 1. RDM: where should collaboration happen? Martin Lewis Director of Library Services & University Librarian, University of Sheffield Stephen Pinfield Senior Lecturer, iSchool, University of Sheffield Directions in Research Data Management Cambridge 2014‐11‐07
- 3. RDM collaboration spaces • Interplanetary – NASA Planetary Data System – ESA Planetary Science Archive Image: NASA
- 4. RDM collaboration spaces • International – Standards, professional development, funder requirements (eg DataCite, CODATA, IDCCs, RDA, ICSU-WDS, Horizon 2020) • National – Policy development, funder requirements, infrastructure & capacity, RDM funding • Regional – Shared services? 3TU, N8 • Institutional – Researcher/professional – Inter-professional
- 5. Institutional Collaborations: Research Data Management Components, Drivers, Stakeholders and Influences Pinfield, S., Cox, AM., & Smith, J. (2015). Research data management and libraries: Relationships, activities, drivers and influences. Forthcoming
- 6. Drivers: Why? Storage Security Preservation Compliance Quality Sharing Jurisdiction Influencing Factors: How? Acceptance Demand Incentives Roles Cultures Governance Politics Resources Projects Skills Communications Setting RDM Programme Components: Library IT Services Academic What? Departments Guidelines Senior University Managers Research Support Services Other Support Services Stakeholders: Who? Researchers: Arts and Humanities Disciplines Researchers: Social Sciences Disciplines Researchers: Science Disciplines Researchers: Engineering Disciplines Researchers: Medicine and Health Disciplines Researchers: Multi- Disciplinary Collaborations Strategies Policies Processes Technologies Services
- 7. Drivers: Why? Storage Security Preservation Compliance Quality Sharing Jurisdiction RDM Programme Components: What? Strategies Policies Guidelines Processes Technologies Services Influencing Factors: How? Acceptance Demand Incentives Roles Cultures Governance Politics Resources Projects Skills Communications Setting Library IT Services Academic Departments Senior University Managers Research Support Services Other Support Services Stakeholders: Who? Researchers: Arts and Humanities Disciplines Researchers: Social Sciences Disciplines Researchers: Science Disciplines Researchers: Engineering Disciplines Researchers: Medicine and Health Disciplines Researchers: Multi- Disciplinary Collaborations Drivers: Why? RDM Programme Components: What? Influencing Factors: How? Stakeholders: Who?
- 8. RDM Programme Components: What? Strategies Policies Guidelines Processes Technologies Services
- 9. Drivers: Why? Storage Security Preservation Compliance Quality Sharing Jurisdiction RDM Programme Components: What? Strategies Policies Guidelines Processes Technologies Services
- 10. Drivers: Why? Storage Security Preservation Compliance Quality Sharing Jurisdiction RDM Programme Components: Library IT Services Academic What? Departments Guidelines Senior University Managers Research Support Services Other Support Services Stakeholders: Who? Researchers: Arts and Humanities Disciplines Researchers: Social Sciences Disciplines Researchers: Science Disciplines Researchers: Engineering Disciplines Researchers: Medicine and Health Disciplines Researchers: Multi- Disciplinary Collaborations Strategies Policies Processes Technologies Services
- 11. Drivers: Why? Storage Security Preservation Compliance Quality Sharing Jurisdiction RDM Programme Components: Library IT Services Academic What? Departments Guidelines Senior University Managers Research Support Services Influencing Factors: How? Acceptance Demand Incentives Roles Cultures Governance Politics Resources Projects Other Support Services Stakeholders: Who? Researchers: Arts and Humanities Disciplines Researchers: Social Sciences Disciplines Researchers: Science Disciplines Researchers: Engineering Disciplines Researchers: Medicine and Health Disciplines Researchers: Multi- Disciplinary Collaborations Skills Communications Setting Strategies Policies Processes Technologies Services
- 12. Identity “dispositions” of professional staff (adapted from a slide by Dr Celia Whitchurch, Institute of Education) Identity ‘dispositions’ Characteristics ‘Bounded professionals’ (voluntary or involuntary) Work within clear structural boundaries (eg specialist function , job description) ‘Cross-boundary professionals’ Actively use boundaries and cross-boundary knowledge for strategic advantage and institutional capacity building ‘Unbounded professionals’ Lack of consciousness of boundaries; focus on broadly-based projects across the university, and contribute to institutional development ‘Blended professionals’ Dedicated appointments spanning professional and academic domains
- 13. Identity “dispositions” of professional staff (adapted from a slide by Dr Celia Whitchurch, Institute of Education) Identity ‘dispositions’ Characteristics ‘Bounded professionals’ (voluntary or involuntary) Work within clear structural boundaries (eg specialist function , job description) ‘Cross-boundary professionals’ RDM workforce development Actively use boundaries and cross-boundary knowledge for strategic advantage and institutional capacity building ‘Unbounded professionals’ Lack of consciousness of boundaries; focus on broadly-based projects across the university, and contribute to institutional development ‘Blended professionals’ Dedicated appointments spanning professional and academic domains
- 14. Collaborative challenges • National shared vision and coordination – Don’t let the dual support system be a divided support system
- 15. Collaborative challenges • National shared vision and coordination – Don’t let the dual support system be a divided support system • Institutional collaboration – Fill the third space – Overcome territorial, identity, and ownership issues
- 16. Collaborative challenges • National shared vision and coordination – Don’t let the dual support system be a divided support system • Institutional collaboration – Fill the third space – Overcome territorial, identity, and ownership issues