BUSINESS ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT THOUGHTS
MANAGEMENT THOUGHTS MATHROUGH NAGEMENT THOUGHTS HAS PASSED VARIOUS STAGES TO REACH ITS PRESENT LEVEL FOR THE PURPOSE OF STUDY  IT IS DIVIDED INTO THREE STAGES
STAGES IN MANAGEMENT THOUGHT THE CLASSICAL THEORY OF MANAGEMENT BUREACRATIC MODEL – MAX WEBBER SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT – FW TAYLOR PROCESS MANAGEMENT – HENRY FAYOL
STAGES IN MANAGEMENT THOUGHT NEO CLASSICAL THEORY HUMAN RELATIONS MOVEMENT – ELTON MAYO BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE MOVEMENT – A MASLOW & McGREGOR
STAGES IN MANAGEMENT THOUGHT 3  MODERN MANAGEMENT THEORIES QUANTITATIVE APPROACH – TAYLOR SYSTEMS APPROACH – BOULDING, JOHNSON CONTINGENCY APPROACH – LORSCH, LAWRENCE
CLASSICAL THEORY OF  MANAGEMENT IT WAS ONLY IN THE SECOND HALF OF 18 TH  CENTURY THAT – JAMES  WATT, BOULTON,ROBERT OWEN AND CHARLES BABBAGE  GAVE SERIOUS THOUGHT TO PROBLEMS OF MANAGEMENT  THIS  PERIOD  IS ALSO KNOWN AS  PRE-TAYLOR PERIOD.  IT IS ONLY WHEN MAX WEBBER INTRODUCED BUREACRATIC MODEL AROUND 1900 THAT THE FIRST SYSTEMATIC  MANAGEMENT THEORY IS  SAID TO HAVE EMERGED
ROBERT OWEN (1771- 1858) HE IS CALLED AS FATHER OF MODERN PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT HE STRESSED ON  IMPROVEMENT  IN WORKING CONDITIONS REDUCTION  IN WORKING HOURS PROVIDING NECESSITIES TO WORKERS ON SUBSIDISED RATES FIXING MINIMUM AGE FOR CHILD WORKERS
CHARLES BABBAGE (1792 – 1871) HIS MAIN EMPHASIS WAS ON USE OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE TO THE OPERATIONS OF FACTORY DIVISION OF WORK ASSIGNMENT OF WORK ON THE  BASIS OF SKILL OF LABOUR DECISIONS BASED ON ACCURATE KNOWLEDGE NEED  FOR  REDUCING COST BY INTRODUCING  IMPROVED METHOD OF WORK HE INVENTED BABBAGE  CALCULATING MACHINE – CALCULATOR OPTIMUM UTILISATION OF MACHINES SPECIALISATION AND WAGE INCENTIVES
EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY HE HAS GIVEN THREE TYPES OF AUTHORITY STRUCTURES,THEY ARE CHARISMATIC TRADITIONAL BUREACRATIC
WEBBER’S BUREACRATIC MODEL THE MODEL INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING: SEPARATION BETWEEN SUPERIOR AND SUBORDINATE DIVISION OF LABOUR BASED ON  COMPETENCE & FUNCTIONAL SPECIALISATION DIVORCE BETWEEN PERSONAL  AND OFFICIAL MATTERS SYSTEM OF RULES, REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES HIERARCHY IN POSITIONS BASED ON LEGAL AUTHORITY
SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT –  FW TAYLOR (1856 – 1915) KNOWN AS FATHER OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT THERE IS A SCIENCE FOR DOING EACH JOB IS THE BELIEF REPLACEMENT OF SCIENTIFIC METHODS IN PLACE OF RULE OF THUMB METHODS ONE BEST WAY OF DOING THINGS –  FOR ANY SITUATION DEFINED MANAGEMENT AS ART OF  KNOWING EXACTLY WHAT YOU WANT MEN TO DO & SEE  THAT THEY DO IT IN THE BEST AND CHEAPEST WAY
SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT – FW TAYLOR (1856 – 1915) ELEMENTS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT WORK STUDY STANDARDISATION OF TOOLS AND EQUIPMENTS SCIENTIFIC SELECTION, PLACEMENT  AND TRAINING INTRODUCTION OF FUNCTIONAL FOREMANSHIP INTRODUCTION OF COSTING SYSTEM MENTAL REVOLUTION
PROCESS MANAGEMENT –  HENRY FAYOL (1841 – 1925) HIS CONTRIBUTIONS ARE CLASSIFIED AS THREE: CLASSIFICATION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITIES FUNCTIONS OF MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
CLASSIFICATION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITIES TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES – PRODUCTION COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES – BUYING, SELLING & EXCHANGE FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES – OPTIMUM USAGE OF CAPITAL SECURITY ACTIVITIES – PRODUCTION OF PROPERTY & PERSONS ACCOUNTING ACTIVITIES MANAGERIAL ACTIVITIES
NEO CLASSICAL THEORY NEO-CLASSICAL THEORY DEALS WITH HUMAN FACTOR ELTON MAYO & MARY PARKER FOLLETT ARE THE MAIN  CONTRIBUTORS OF HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACH IT IS THE SOURCE FOR STUDIES OF  BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE MANAGEMENT
HUMAN RELATIONS MANAGEMENT STUDY DEALS WITH IMPROVEMENT OF: WORKING  CONDITIONS LOWERING OF HOURS OF WORK SOCIAL  RELATIONS  OF WORKERS IMPROVEMENT  IN PRODUCTIVITY
ELTON MAYO  (1880 – 1949) FATHER OF HUMAN RELATIONS MOVEMENT A TURNING POINT IN THE DEVELOPMENT  OF MANAGEMENT THOUGHT HE IS KNOWN  FOR  HIS WORK ON THE PROJECT HAWTHORNE STUDIES THE STUDIES WERE CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF  BETTER PHYSICAL  FACILITIES ON WORKERS’ OUTPUT
HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENT PHASE – 1  INVOLVES 5 GIRLS ENGAGED IN ELECTRICAL ASSEMBLY  TESTING THIS EXPERIMENT CONTINUED FOR MORE  THAN  1½ YEARS  THIS STUDY CONCENTRATED ON IMPROVEMENT ON PHYSICAL FACILITIES LIKE EXTENDED REST  HOURS, ETC. AND FOUND THAT THE  PRODUCTIVITY OF WORKERS WILL INCREASE WITH BETTER  FACILITIES
HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENT PHASE – II  IN THIS  PHASE  THE  EMPLOYEES  WERE TOLD THAT THEY ARE IMPROVING  THE FACILITIES AND THEY  ARE CHOSEN FOR EXPERIMENT – THIS  BOOSTED THEIR MORALE AND IMPROVED THE OVERALL PRODUCTIVITY FURTHER
HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENT PHASE – III  THE LAST OF THE EXPERIMENTS WAS ON 14 MEN  AND 4 SUPERVISORS WORKING IN A BANK WIRING OBSERVATION ROOM IT IS FOUND THAT THE INFORMAL  RELATIONSHIPS AMONG  THE  WORKERS HAVE GREATER  ROLE THAN THE DESIRE OF EARNING HUGE AMOUNTS AND COMPANY’S  FORMAL  REQUIREMENTS
HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENT MAIN FINDINGS: WORKERS ARE NOT SIMPLY COGS IN THE MACHINERY EMPLOYEE MORALE WILL AFFECT ON THE PRODUCTIVITY EMPLOYEES  FORM AS SOCIAL GROUPS  IN THE ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE GROUP ATTITUDE AND PSYCHOLOGY
MARY PARKER FOLLETT (1868 -  1933) EMPHASIS ON PSYCHOLOGICAL  ASPECTS OF WORKERS – Vs. ELTON MAYO’S ON PHYSICAL CONDITIONS PARTICIPATION OF WORKERS IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS IMPROVES THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE WORKERS  HER MAIN CONCERN WAS EFFICIENT USE OF PEOPLE SHE HAS A REPUTATION AS A PIONEER OF HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACH
BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE MOVEMENT FURTHER IMPROVEMENT OF HUMAN RELATIONS MOVEMENT INTRODUCED BY ABRAHAM MASLOW & DOUGLAS McGREGOR FOLLOWED BY RENSI LINKERT, CHESTER BERNARD
BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE MOVEMENT IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF THIS APPROACH: MOTIVATION ORGANISATION AS A SOCIAL SYSTEM LEADERSHIP COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
ABRAHAM MASLOW MASLOW’S NEED HIERARCHY THEORY: PHYSIOLOGICAL NEEDS SAFETY NEEDS SOCIAL NEEDS EGO OR ESTEEM NEEDS SELF FULFILMENT OR ACTUALIZATION
DOUGLAS McGREGOR (1906 – 1964) HE IS KNOWN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THEORY  ON  MOTIVATION HE NAMED IT AS THEORY X AND THEORY Y
DOUGLAS McGREGOR (1906 – 1964) THEORY – X THEORY – Y  WORKER IS LAZY AND DISLIKES WORK PEOPLE ARE NOT LAZY BY NATURE BUT THE TREAT-MENT IN ORGANIZATION MAKES THEM SO THEY ARE UNAMBITIOUS AND AVOID RESPONSI-BILITY THEY ARE AMBITIOUS AND THEY ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY UNDER PROPER CONDITIONS THEY ARE NOT BOTHERED ABOUT ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES – THEY SHOULD BE DIRECTED THEY WILL EXERCISE SELF CONTROL AND SELF DIRECTION – NEED NOT BE DIRECTED
RENSIS LIKERT (1903 – 1972)  HE WAS OF THE VIEW THAT TRADITIONAL JOB  ORIENTED SUPERVISION WAS THE CAUSE OF LOW PRODUCTIVITY AND LOW MORALE HE SUGGESTED PARTICIPATIVE MANAGEMENT IN DECISION MAKING HE CLASSIFIED MANAGEMENT STYLES INTO FOUR CATEGORIES
RENSIS LIKERT FOUR CATEGORIES EXPLOITATIVE AUTOCRATIC BENEVOLENT AUTOCRATIC PARTICIPATIVE DEMOCRATIC
RENSIS LIKERT 1.Exploitative Autocratic: There is no participation of workers because these leaders have no confidence in them 2.Benevolent Autocratic: There is no proper confidence in subordinates and the relationship is that of master and servant
RENSIS LIKERT 3.Participative: The subordinates are allowed to participate in decision involving their lives. Leaders does not have full confidence in them 4.Democratic: In this style the confidence in subordinates is full and they meaningfully participate in decision making
CHESTER I BERNARD (1886 – 1961)  HE ADOPTED A SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH EMPHASISED ON THE IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION DIVIDED ORGANIZATION INTO FORMAL AND INFORMAL HE DIVIDED FUNCTIONS OF EXECUTIVES IN TO THREE CATEGORIES PROVIDING SYSTEM OF COMMUNICATION SECURING  EFFECTS FORMULATING AND  DEFINING PURPOSE
III MODERN MANAGEMENT THEORIES QUANTITATIVE APPROACH SYSTEM APPROACH CONTINGENCY APPROACH
QUANTITATIVE APPROACH MATHEMATICS IS RECOGNIZED AS AN IMPORTANT TOOL OFANALYSIS AND A LANGUAGE FOR EXPRESSION OF CONCEPT PROBLEMS CAN BE EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF SYMBOLS AND RELATIONSHIP
FEATURES  OF QUANTITATIVE APPROACH MANAGEMENT IS CONCERNED WITH  PROBLEM SOLVING AND MUST USE MATHEMATICAL TOOLS TO SOLVE THEM MATHEMATICAL SYMBOLS  CAN BE USED TO DESCRIBE MANAGERIAL PROBLEMS MATHEMATICAL TOOLS – OPERATIONS RESEARCH, SIMULATION AND MODEL BUILDINGS ARE USED TO FIND SOLUTIONS
LIMITATIONS OF QUANTATIVE APPROACH MANAGEMENT HAS MANY OTHER FUNCTIONS OTHER THAN DECISION MAKING THIS  APPROACH DOES NOT GIVE ANY WEIGHTAGE TO HUMAN ELEMENT IN PRACTICAL LIFE – MANAGERS HAVE TO TAKE DECISIONS WITHOUT WAITING FOR DEVELOPING OF MODELS THIS APPROACH PRESUMES ALL VARIABLES OF DECISION  MAKING ARE MEASURABLE
SYSTEMS APPROACH THIS APPROACH LOOKS UPON THE MANAGEMENT AS A SYSTEM FEATURES: AN ORGANIZATION CONSISTS OF MANY SUB-SYSTEMS ALL SUB-SYSTEMS ARE MUTUALLY RELATED TO EACH OTHER THE SUB-PART SHOULD BE STUDIES IN THEIR INTER RELATIONSHIP THE ORGANIZATION PROVIDES A BOUNDARY WHICH SEPARATES IT CHESTER BERNARD  WAS THE FIRST TO SEE MANAGEMENTIN THE CONTEXT OF A SYSTEM THIS APPROACH DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES FOR EXECUTIVES
CONTINGENCY OR SITUATIONAL APPROACH THIS APPROACH WAS DEVELOPED BY J W LORSCH & PR LAWRENCE IN 1970 WHO WERE CRITICAL OF OTHER APPROACHES PRE-SUPPOSING (ONE BEST WAY TO MANAGE) FEATURES: MANAGEMENT IS ENTIRELY SITUATIONAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES & PROCEDURES SHOULD RESPOND TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS MANAGER SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS NO ONE BEST WAY OF MANAGING A MANAGER IS EXPECTED TO KNOW ALL  THE ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION BEFORE TAKING ACTION IN A SITUATION – IT IS NOT ALWAYS POSSIBLE
ANY QUERIES ?

Management thoughts

  • 1.
    BUSINESS ORGANIZATION ANDMANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT THOUGHTS
  • 2.
    MANAGEMENT THOUGHTS MATHROUGHNAGEMENT THOUGHTS HAS PASSED VARIOUS STAGES TO REACH ITS PRESENT LEVEL FOR THE PURPOSE OF STUDY IT IS DIVIDED INTO THREE STAGES
  • 3.
    STAGES IN MANAGEMENTTHOUGHT THE CLASSICAL THEORY OF MANAGEMENT BUREACRATIC MODEL – MAX WEBBER SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT – FW TAYLOR PROCESS MANAGEMENT – HENRY FAYOL
  • 4.
    STAGES IN MANAGEMENTTHOUGHT NEO CLASSICAL THEORY HUMAN RELATIONS MOVEMENT – ELTON MAYO BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE MOVEMENT – A MASLOW & McGREGOR
  • 5.
    STAGES IN MANAGEMENTTHOUGHT 3 MODERN MANAGEMENT THEORIES QUANTITATIVE APPROACH – TAYLOR SYSTEMS APPROACH – BOULDING, JOHNSON CONTINGENCY APPROACH – LORSCH, LAWRENCE
  • 6.
    CLASSICAL THEORY OF MANAGEMENT IT WAS ONLY IN THE SECOND HALF OF 18 TH CENTURY THAT – JAMES WATT, BOULTON,ROBERT OWEN AND CHARLES BABBAGE GAVE SERIOUS THOUGHT TO PROBLEMS OF MANAGEMENT THIS PERIOD IS ALSO KNOWN AS PRE-TAYLOR PERIOD. IT IS ONLY WHEN MAX WEBBER INTRODUCED BUREACRATIC MODEL AROUND 1900 THAT THE FIRST SYSTEMATIC MANAGEMENT THEORY IS SAID TO HAVE EMERGED
  • 7.
    ROBERT OWEN (1771-1858) HE IS CALLED AS FATHER OF MODERN PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT HE STRESSED ON IMPROVEMENT IN WORKING CONDITIONS REDUCTION IN WORKING HOURS PROVIDING NECESSITIES TO WORKERS ON SUBSIDISED RATES FIXING MINIMUM AGE FOR CHILD WORKERS
  • 8.
    CHARLES BABBAGE (1792– 1871) HIS MAIN EMPHASIS WAS ON USE OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE TO THE OPERATIONS OF FACTORY DIVISION OF WORK ASSIGNMENT OF WORK ON THE BASIS OF SKILL OF LABOUR DECISIONS BASED ON ACCURATE KNOWLEDGE NEED FOR REDUCING COST BY INTRODUCING IMPROVED METHOD OF WORK HE INVENTED BABBAGE CALCULATING MACHINE – CALCULATOR OPTIMUM UTILISATION OF MACHINES SPECIALISATION AND WAGE INCENTIVES
  • 9.
    EXERCISE OF AUTHORITYHE HAS GIVEN THREE TYPES OF AUTHORITY STRUCTURES,THEY ARE CHARISMATIC TRADITIONAL BUREACRATIC
  • 10.
    WEBBER’S BUREACRATIC MODELTHE MODEL INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING: SEPARATION BETWEEN SUPERIOR AND SUBORDINATE DIVISION OF LABOUR BASED ON COMPETENCE & FUNCTIONAL SPECIALISATION DIVORCE BETWEEN PERSONAL AND OFFICIAL MATTERS SYSTEM OF RULES, REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES HIERARCHY IN POSITIONS BASED ON LEGAL AUTHORITY
  • 11.
    SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT – FW TAYLOR (1856 – 1915) KNOWN AS FATHER OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT THERE IS A SCIENCE FOR DOING EACH JOB IS THE BELIEF REPLACEMENT OF SCIENTIFIC METHODS IN PLACE OF RULE OF THUMB METHODS ONE BEST WAY OF DOING THINGS – FOR ANY SITUATION DEFINED MANAGEMENT AS ART OF KNOWING EXACTLY WHAT YOU WANT MEN TO DO & SEE THAT THEY DO IT IN THE BEST AND CHEAPEST WAY
  • 12.
    SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT –FW TAYLOR (1856 – 1915) ELEMENTS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT WORK STUDY STANDARDISATION OF TOOLS AND EQUIPMENTS SCIENTIFIC SELECTION, PLACEMENT AND TRAINING INTRODUCTION OF FUNCTIONAL FOREMANSHIP INTRODUCTION OF COSTING SYSTEM MENTAL REVOLUTION
  • 13.
    PROCESS MANAGEMENT – HENRY FAYOL (1841 – 1925) HIS CONTRIBUTIONS ARE CLASSIFIED AS THREE: CLASSIFICATION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITIES FUNCTIONS OF MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
  • 14.
    CLASSIFICATION OF BUSINESSACTIVITIES TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES – PRODUCTION COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES – BUYING, SELLING & EXCHANGE FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES – OPTIMUM USAGE OF CAPITAL SECURITY ACTIVITIES – PRODUCTION OF PROPERTY & PERSONS ACCOUNTING ACTIVITIES MANAGERIAL ACTIVITIES
  • 15.
    NEO CLASSICAL THEORYNEO-CLASSICAL THEORY DEALS WITH HUMAN FACTOR ELTON MAYO & MARY PARKER FOLLETT ARE THE MAIN CONTRIBUTORS OF HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACH IT IS THE SOURCE FOR STUDIES OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE MANAGEMENT
  • 16.
    HUMAN RELATIONS MANAGEMENTSTUDY DEALS WITH IMPROVEMENT OF: WORKING CONDITIONS LOWERING OF HOURS OF WORK SOCIAL RELATIONS OF WORKERS IMPROVEMENT IN PRODUCTIVITY
  • 17.
    ELTON MAYO (1880 – 1949) FATHER OF HUMAN RELATIONS MOVEMENT A TURNING POINT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT THOUGHT HE IS KNOWN FOR HIS WORK ON THE PROJECT HAWTHORNE STUDIES THE STUDIES WERE CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF BETTER PHYSICAL FACILITIES ON WORKERS’ OUTPUT
  • 18.
    HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENT PHASE– 1 INVOLVES 5 GIRLS ENGAGED IN ELECTRICAL ASSEMBLY TESTING THIS EXPERIMENT CONTINUED FOR MORE THAN 1½ YEARS THIS STUDY CONCENTRATED ON IMPROVEMENT ON PHYSICAL FACILITIES LIKE EXTENDED REST HOURS, ETC. AND FOUND THAT THE PRODUCTIVITY OF WORKERS WILL INCREASE WITH BETTER FACILITIES
  • 19.
    HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENT PHASE– II IN THIS PHASE THE EMPLOYEES WERE TOLD THAT THEY ARE IMPROVING THE FACILITIES AND THEY ARE CHOSEN FOR EXPERIMENT – THIS BOOSTED THEIR MORALE AND IMPROVED THE OVERALL PRODUCTIVITY FURTHER
  • 20.
    HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENT PHASE– III THE LAST OF THE EXPERIMENTS WAS ON 14 MEN AND 4 SUPERVISORS WORKING IN A BANK WIRING OBSERVATION ROOM IT IS FOUND THAT THE INFORMAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG THE WORKERS HAVE GREATER ROLE THAN THE DESIRE OF EARNING HUGE AMOUNTS AND COMPANY’S FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
  • 21.
    HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENT MAINFINDINGS: WORKERS ARE NOT SIMPLY COGS IN THE MACHINERY EMPLOYEE MORALE WILL AFFECT ON THE PRODUCTIVITY EMPLOYEES FORM AS SOCIAL GROUPS IN THE ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE GROUP ATTITUDE AND PSYCHOLOGY
  • 22.
    MARY PARKER FOLLETT(1868 - 1933) EMPHASIS ON PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF WORKERS – Vs. ELTON MAYO’S ON PHYSICAL CONDITIONS PARTICIPATION OF WORKERS IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS IMPROVES THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE WORKERS HER MAIN CONCERN WAS EFFICIENT USE OF PEOPLE SHE HAS A REPUTATION AS A PIONEER OF HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACH
  • 23.
    BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE MOVEMENTFURTHER IMPROVEMENT OF HUMAN RELATIONS MOVEMENT INTRODUCED BY ABRAHAM MASLOW & DOUGLAS McGREGOR FOLLOWED BY RENSI LINKERT, CHESTER BERNARD
  • 24.
    BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE MOVEMENTIMPORTANT ASPECTS OF THIS APPROACH: MOTIVATION ORGANISATION AS A SOCIAL SYSTEM LEADERSHIP COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
  • 25.
    ABRAHAM MASLOW MASLOW’SNEED HIERARCHY THEORY: PHYSIOLOGICAL NEEDS SAFETY NEEDS SOCIAL NEEDS EGO OR ESTEEM NEEDS SELF FULFILMENT OR ACTUALIZATION
  • 26.
    DOUGLAS McGREGOR (1906– 1964) HE IS KNOWN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THEORY ON MOTIVATION HE NAMED IT AS THEORY X AND THEORY Y
  • 27.
    DOUGLAS McGREGOR (1906– 1964) THEORY – X THEORY – Y WORKER IS LAZY AND DISLIKES WORK PEOPLE ARE NOT LAZY BY NATURE BUT THE TREAT-MENT IN ORGANIZATION MAKES THEM SO THEY ARE UNAMBITIOUS AND AVOID RESPONSI-BILITY THEY ARE AMBITIOUS AND THEY ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY UNDER PROPER CONDITIONS THEY ARE NOT BOTHERED ABOUT ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES – THEY SHOULD BE DIRECTED THEY WILL EXERCISE SELF CONTROL AND SELF DIRECTION – NEED NOT BE DIRECTED
  • 28.
    RENSIS LIKERT (1903– 1972) HE WAS OF THE VIEW THAT TRADITIONAL JOB ORIENTED SUPERVISION WAS THE CAUSE OF LOW PRODUCTIVITY AND LOW MORALE HE SUGGESTED PARTICIPATIVE MANAGEMENT IN DECISION MAKING HE CLASSIFIED MANAGEMENT STYLES INTO FOUR CATEGORIES
  • 29.
    RENSIS LIKERT FOURCATEGORIES EXPLOITATIVE AUTOCRATIC BENEVOLENT AUTOCRATIC PARTICIPATIVE DEMOCRATIC
  • 30.
    RENSIS LIKERT 1.ExploitativeAutocratic: There is no participation of workers because these leaders have no confidence in them 2.Benevolent Autocratic: There is no proper confidence in subordinates and the relationship is that of master and servant
  • 31.
    RENSIS LIKERT 3.Participative:The subordinates are allowed to participate in decision involving their lives. Leaders does not have full confidence in them 4.Democratic: In this style the confidence in subordinates is full and they meaningfully participate in decision making
  • 32.
    CHESTER I BERNARD(1886 – 1961) HE ADOPTED A SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH EMPHASISED ON THE IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION DIVIDED ORGANIZATION INTO FORMAL AND INFORMAL HE DIVIDED FUNCTIONS OF EXECUTIVES IN TO THREE CATEGORIES PROVIDING SYSTEM OF COMMUNICATION SECURING EFFECTS FORMULATING AND DEFINING PURPOSE
  • 33.
    III MODERN MANAGEMENTTHEORIES QUANTITATIVE APPROACH SYSTEM APPROACH CONTINGENCY APPROACH
  • 34.
    QUANTITATIVE APPROACH MATHEMATICSIS RECOGNIZED AS AN IMPORTANT TOOL OFANALYSIS AND A LANGUAGE FOR EXPRESSION OF CONCEPT PROBLEMS CAN BE EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF SYMBOLS AND RELATIONSHIP
  • 35.
    FEATURES OFQUANTITATIVE APPROACH MANAGEMENT IS CONCERNED WITH PROBLEM SOLVING AND MUST USE MATHEMATICAL TOOLS TO SOLVE THEM MATHEMATICAL SYMBOLS CAN BE USED TO DESCRIBE MANAGERIAL PROBLEMS MATHEMATICAL TOOLS – OPERATIONS RESEARCH, SIMULATION AND MODEL BUILDINGS ARE USED TO FIND SOLUTIONS
  • 36.
    LIMITATIONS OF QUANTATIVEAPPROACH MANAGEMENT HAS MANY OTHER FUNCTIONS OTHER THAN DECISION MAKING THIS APPROACH DOES NOT GIVE ANY WEIGHTAGE TO HUMAN ELEMENT IN PRACTICAL LIFE – MANAGERS HAVE TO TAKE DECISIONS WITHOUT WAITING FOR DEVELOPING OF MODELS THIS APPROACH PRESUMES ALL VARIABLES OF DECISION MAKING ARE MEASURABLE
  • 37.
    SYSTEMS APPROACH THISAPPROACH LOOKS UPON THE MANAGEMENT AS A SYSTEM FEATURES: AN ORGANIZATION CONSISTS OF MANY SUB-SYSTEMS ALL SUB-SYSTEMS ARE MUTUALLY RELATED TO EACH OTHER THE SUB-PART SHOULD BE STUDIES IN THEIR INTER RELATIONSHIP THE ORGANIZATION PROVIDES A BOUNDARY WHICH SEPARATES IT CHESTER BERNARD WAS THE FIRST TO SEE MANAGEMENTIN THE CONTEXT OF A SYSTEM THIS APPROACH DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES FOR EXECUTIVES
  • 38.
    CONTINGENCY OR SITUATIONALAPPROACH THIS APPROACH WAS DEVELOPED BY J W LORSCH & PR LAWRENCE IN 1970 WHO WERE CRITICAL OF OTHER APPROACHES PRE-SUPPOSING (ONE BEST WAY TO MANAGE) FEATURES: MANAGEMENT IS ENTIRELY SITUATIONAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES & PROCEDURES SHOULD RESPOND TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS MANAGER SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS NO ONE BEST WAY OF MANAGING A MANAGER IS EXPECTED TO KNOW ALL THE ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION BEFORE TAKING ACTION IN A SITUATION – IT IS NOT ALWAYS POSSIBLE
  • 39.