This document discusses different types of logical fallacies. It begins by defining logic and fallacies. There are two types of fallacies discussed - formal fallacies which can be identified by examining the structure of an argument, and informal fallacies which require examining the content. Several examples of informal fallacies are then described in detail, including appeals to force/pity, red herrings, hasty generalizations, straw man arguments, appeals to inappropriate authority, the fallacies of composition and division.
Informal Fallacies, Introduction, Explanation, Types of Fallacies,
Formal Fallacy: affirming the consequent, denying the antecedent.
Classification of Fallacies:
Fallacies of relevance: appeal to the populace, fallacy of straw man, the red herring, appeal to force, argument against the person, appeal to emotion, missing the point.
Fallacies of defective induction: appeal to ignorance, appeal to inappropriate, hasty generalization, false cause.
Fallacy of Presumption: beginning the question, complex question, accident.
Fallacies of ambiguity: Equivocation, Composition, Division, Amphiboly, Accent.
Avoidance, strategies, and factors of fallacies
Informal Fallacies, Introduction, Explanation, Types of Fallacies,
Formal Fallacy: affirming the consequent, denying the antecedent.
Classification of Fallacies:
Fallacies of relevance: appeal to the populace, fallacy of straw man, the red herring, appeal to force, argument against the person, appeal to emotion, missing the point.
Fallacies of defective induction: appeal to ignorance, appeal to inappropriate, hasty generalization, false cause.
Fallacy of Presumption: beginning the question, complex question, accident.
Fallacies of ambiguity: Equivocation, Composition, Division, Amphiboly, Accent.
Avoidance, strategies, and factors of fallacies
1.1 arguments, premises, and conclusionsSaqlain Akram
Formal Logic : Leacture 01
Chapter 1: Basic Concepts
1.1 Arguments, Premises, and Conclusions
Follow on Facebook:
https://web.facebook.com/learnforgood...
and on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8kUyEAA5ix6Bl5H5gKXo3A
Like, Comment and Share.
Also Subscribe For More Videos.
Learn For Good.
1.1 arguments, premises, and conclusionsSaqlain Akram
Formal Logic : Leacture 01
Chapter 1: Basic Concepts
1.1 Arguments, Premises, and Conclusions
Follow on Facebook:
https://web.facebook.com/learnforgood...
and on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8kUyEAA5ix6Bl5H5gKXo3A
Like, Comment and Share.
Also Subscribe For More Videos.
Learn For Good.
Through this we will be able to understand the fallacies of vagueness clearly with the help of examples. It shares some useful examples. the definitions and points are very clear here.
432018 University of Phoenix Critical Thinkinghttpsp.docxalinainglis
4/3/2018 University of Phoenix: Critical Thinking
https://phoenix.vitalsource.com/#/books/1259764613/cfi/6/36!/4/434/770/[email protected]:67.9 1/76
Page 135
PRINTED BY: [email protected] Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may
be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
5 Rhetoric, the Art of Persuasion
Students will learn to . . .
1. Explain the concepts of rhetorical force and emotive power
2. Identify and critique the use of euphemisms, dysphemisms, weaslers, and downplayers
3. Identify and critique the use of stereotypes, innuendo, and loaded questions
4. Identify and critique the use of ridicule, sarcasm, and hyperbole
5. Identify and critique the use of rhetorical definitions, explanations, analogies, and misleading
comparisons
6. Identify and critique the use of proof surrogates and repetition
7. Identify and critique the persuasive aspects of visual images
8. Detect the techniques used in the extreme rhetoric of demagoguery
4/3/2018 University of Phoenix: Critical Thinking
https://phoenix.vitalsource.com/#/books/1259764613/cfi/6/36!/4/434/770/[email protected]:67.9 2/76
R hetoric, the venerable art of persuasivse writing and speaking, has been one of the twinanchors of Western education since the days of Aristotle. The other, which also dates fromAristotle, is logic. You use rhetoric to win someone to your point of view; you use logic to
demonstrate a claim or support it. These are separate enterprises. You can use logic to persuade people,
but all too often they are persuaded by poor logic and unmoved by good logic. This is why education
increasingly emphasizes critical thinking, to help people improve their logic and to help them
distinguish between proof and persuasion.
In this chapter we do three things. First, we introduce the important concept of rhetorical force.
Then we explain several rhetorical devices. Good writers and speakers employ many of these devices
to make their cases as persuasive as possible. None of the devices, however, have logical force or
probative weight (“probative” means tending to prove). We, as critical thinkers, should be able to
recognize them for what they are— devices of persuasion.
Last, after we examine the various devices, we examine four principal techniques of demagoguery.
Demagogues use inflammatory rhetoric to win acceptance for false and misleading ideas. They appeal
to the fears and prejudices of an audience, and depend on its inability to see through their tricks.
Famous demagogues include Adolf Hitler, Joseph McCarthy, and others. Spotting demagoguery and
resisting it is perhaps the most important skill a critical thinker can have.
4/3/2018 University of Phoenix: Critical Thinking
https://phoenix.vitalsource.com/#/books/1259764613/cfi/6/36!/4/434/770/[email protected]:67.9 3/76
Page 136
PRINTED BY: [email protected] Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may
b.
The slides aim to train members of Ateneo Debate Union to detect fallacies in argumentation. It is the hope that this would enhance their case construction skills. The principles used borrows heavily from logic.
Chapter 3Evaluating Moral ArgumentsWhat Is Moral Reasoning.docxwalterl4
Chapter 3
Evaluating Moral Arguments
What Is Moral Reasoning?
Moral reasoningis ordinary critical reasoning applied to ethics.
Critical reasoning(also called critical thinking) is the careful, systematic evaluation of statementsand arguments.
Statements
A statement(or claim) is the assertion that something is either true or false. The following are examples of statements:“Murder is wrong.”“1 + 1 = 2”“Shakespeare wrote The Tempest.”
Statements and Arguments –1
When at least one statement attempts to provide reasons for believing another statement, we have an argument—a group of statements, one of which is supposed to be supported by the rest.
Statements and Arguments –2
The supporting statements are called premises.
The statement that is being supported by the others is the conclusion.
Identifying ArgumentsAn argumentis intended to prove something.All arguments share a pattern: at least one premise is required to support a conclusion.A cluster of unsupported claims is not an argument.The most reliable way to identify arguments is to look for the conclusion first.Look for indicator words:terms that often appear in arguments and signal that a premise or conclusion may be nearby.
Some words indicating a conclusion:
Therefore, consequently, hence, it follows that, thus, so, it must be thatSome words indicating a premise:
Because, since, for, given that, due to the fact that, for the reason that, the reason being, assuming that, as indicated by
Two Forms of Argument
A deductive argumentis supposed to give logically conclusivesupport to its conclusion.
An inductive argumentis supposed to offer probablesupport to its conclusion.
Common Deductive Argument FormsValid forms:Denying the antecedentAffirming the consequent Invalid forms:Affirming the antecedent(modus ponens)Denying the consequent(modus tollens)The hypothetical syllogism
Deductive Arguments
A deductive argument isvalidif the premises support the conclusion. That is, the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. If the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true.
A deductive argument is invalidif the premises do not support the conclusion. That is, the conclusion does not follow necessarily from the premises. If the premises are true, then the conclusion may or may not be true.
A deductive argument is sound if it is valid and all its premises are true.
A deductive argument is unsound if it is invalid and/or any of its premises are false.
Inductive Arguments
An inductive argument is strongif it gives probable support to its conclusion. That is, if its premises are true, its conclusion is also likely to be true.
An inductive argument is weak if it does not give probable support to its conclusion. That is, if its premises are true, its conclusion is not more probable than not to be true.
An inductive argument is cogentif it is strong and all of its premises are true.
An inductive argument is not cogent if it is weakand/or any of.
English 104Argument AnalysisThe AssignmentDue No l.docxSALU18
English 104
Argument Analysis
The Assignment:
Due: No later than October 10, 2016
Must be MLA format only!!
Select an online editorial article about a current issue. (i.e.: Presidential Candidates, Labor Union Influence on Government, The Affordable Health Care Act, Illegal Immigration, Entitlement programs, etc.) You may choose ANY issue; the list above is NOT exhaustive.
The article MUST be an op-ed (editorial) piece, as it must present an argument of some type. You may not use a straight news story.
Read the article and decide what perspective the writer is taking on a particular issue.
Submit a Minimum 3-page analysis of the writer’s argument. And works cited, make sure to follow the Don’t’s of writing and include Parenthetical refrencing.
Paper must include:
· A discussion of the author’s thesis
· Whether he/she employs faulty reasoning (see fallacy assignment below) in the discussion.
· What he/she could have done to present a more thorough argument (may include more consideration of the opposing viewpoint)
· A thorough discussion of the main points of the article and whether or not he/she has provided adequate support to prove his/her thesis.
· A conclusion that discusses the effectiveness of the chosen article in regards to the author’s intent.
Include a link to the article on the Works Cited page.
You may choose whomever you wish; he/she DOES NOT have to appear on the list below.
Some commentators to consider when looking for an article:
Larry Elder
Star Parker
Sean Hannity
Alan Colmes
Michelle Malkin
John Ziegler
Bill O’Reilly
Chris Matthews
Leslie Marshall
The following link provides a list of controversial commentators (some listed above) you may wish to choose from.
http://www.usnews.com/news/washington-whispers/slideshows/top-10-most-hated-news-commentators
Fallacies:
Look over the fallacy discussion and familiarize yourself with some common every day fallacies (i.e.: Post Hoc, False Analogy, Hasty Generalization, Slippery Slope, Straw Man, Begging the Question, Red Herring, Poisoning the Well, Ad Hominem).
Logical Fallacies Handlist:
Fallacies are statements that might sound reasonable or superficially true but are actually flawed or dishonest. When readers detect them, these logical fallacies backfire by making the audience think the writer is (a) unintelligent or (b) deceptive. It is important to avoid them in your own arguments, and it is also important to be able to spot them in others' arguments so a false line of reasoning won't fool you. Think of this as intellectual kung-fu: the art of self-defense in a debate. In general, one useful way to organize fallacies is by category. Below are fallacies of relevance, component fallacies, fallacies of ambiguity, and fallacies of omission.
FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE: These fallacies appeal to evidence or examples that are not relevant to the argument at hand.
Appeal to Force (Argumentum Ad Baculum or the "Might-Makes-Right" Fallacy): Th ...
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docxmigdalialyle
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of informal fallacy arguments. This assignment allows you to examine common fallacies in everyday reasoning.
Using the types of arguments listed in the textbook chapter “Flimsy Structures,” respond to the following:
Draft two original fallacies. Do not identify the fallacies, allow your peers to determine what fallacy your example represents.
Next, using the Internet, respond to the following:
Research a third informal fallacy not already covered in the text.
Identify and define the fallacy. For example, appeal to tradition, false dichotomy, etc.
Provide a citation for your source.
Construct an original fallacy argument of that type.
Support your statements with examples and scholarly references.
Write your initial response in 1–2 paragraphs. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.
By
Sunday, October 7, 2012
, post your response to the appropriate
Discussion Area
. Through
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
, review and comment on at least two peers’ responses. Identify their fallacies and suggest ways in which they can refine their arguments.
Grading Criteria and Rubric
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Initial Discussion Response
16
Discussion Participation
16
Writing Craftsmanship and Ethical Scholarship
8
Total:
40
CHAPTER 12
Flimsy Structures
This chapter could have been titled “
Un
warranted Inferences.” The following are certain infamous reasons given to support arguments—infamous because they mimic real support. There are two basic replies to these inferences: “So what?” or “What else?”
Abusing arguments may be among the world’s older professions. Proper names for many types of abuse are in Latin. I’ll deal only with the seven deadliest: inconsistency,
ad hominem
attacks, appeal to pity, begging the questions,
post hoc ergo propter hoc
, appeal (only) to the many, and straw man.
INCONSISTENCY
Two main ways of being inconsistent come to mind:
1.
Offering reasons that are contradictory
. For example, arguing that most people who strive for success do so out of hunger for love and admiration they didn’t get when growing up; and in the same book arguing that most people strive for success because they can afford to take the risk of failure, having been given a lot of encouragement and attention as children. Since encouragement and attention are tantamount to love and admiration, this argument is foundering on inconsistency unless the arguer makes a careful distinction between the pairs of terms
love-admiration
and
encouragement-attention
to explain this disparity.
2.
Offering reasons that contradict the conclusion
. For example, we should conserve on fuel because many of the elderly poor are dying from lack of heat in the winter. Given that reason, the conclusion would appear to be the opposite: that we should expend more fuel, at least on the elderly poor (unless some fiend is advocating killing off the elderly poor).
Enjoy Being on the Lookout
You can .
Explore our most comprehensive guide on lookback analysis at SafePaaS, covering access governance and how it can transform modern ERP audits. Browse now!
Accpac to QuickBooks Conversion Navigating the Transition with Online Account...PaulBryant58
This article provides a comprehensive guide on how to
effectively manage the convert Accpac to QuickBooks , with a particular focus on utilizing online accounting services to streamline the process.
Memorandum Of Association Constitution of Company.pptseri bangash
www.seribangash.com
A Memorandum of Association (MOA) is a legal document that outlines the fundamental principles and objectives upon which a company operates. It serves as the company's charter or constitution and defines the scope of its activities. Here's a detailed note on the MOA:
Contents of Memorandum of Association:
Name Clause: This clause states the name of the company, which should end with words like "Limited" or "Ltd." for a public limited company and "Private Limited" or "Pvt. Ltd." for a private limited company.
https://seribangash.com/article-of-association-is-legal-doc-of-company/
Registered Office Clause: It specifies the location where the company's registered office is situated. This office is where all official communications and notices are sent.
Objective Clause: This clause delineates the main objectives for which the company is formed. It's important to define these objectives clearly, as the company cannot undertake activities beyond those mentioned in this clause.
www.seribangash.com
Liability Clause: It outlines the extent of liability of the company's members. In the case of companies limited by shares, the liability of members is limited to the amount unpaid on their shares. For companies limited by guarantee, members' liability is limited to the amount they undertake to contribute if the company is wound up.
https://seribangash.com/promotors-is-person-conceived-formation-company/
Capital Clause: This clause specifies the authorized capital of the company, i.e., the maximum amount of share capital the company is authorized to issue. It also mentions the division of this capital into shares and their respective nominal value.
Association Clause: It simply states that the subscribers wish to form a company and agree to become members of it, in accordance with the terms of the MOA.
Importance of Memorandum of Association:
Legal Requirement: The MOA is a legal requirement for the formation of a company. It must be filed with the Registrar of Companies during the incorporation process.
Constitutional Document: It serves as the company's constitutional document, defining its scope, powers, and limitations.
Protection of Members: It protects the interests of the company's members by clearly defining the objectives and limiting their liability.
External Communication: It provides clarity to external parties, such as investors, creditors, and regulatory authorities, regarding the company's objectives and powers.
https://seribangash.com/difference-public-and-private-company-law/
Binding Authority: The company and its members are bound by the provisions of the MOA. Any action taken beyond its scope may be considered ultra vires (beyond the powers) of the company and therefore void.
Amendment of MOA:
While the MOA lays down the company's fundamental principles, it is not entirely immutable. It can be amended, but only under specific circumstances and in compliance with legal procedures. Amendments typically require shareholder
Taurus Zodiac Sign_ Personality Traits and Sign Dates.pptxmy Pandit
Explore the world of the Taurus zodiac sign. Learn about their stability, determination, and appreciation for beauty. Discover how Taureans' grounded nature and hardworking mindset define their unique personality.
As a business owner in Delaware, staying on top of your tax obligations is paramount, especially with the annual deadline for Delaware Franchise Tax looming on March 1. One such obligation is the annual Delaware Franchise Tax, which serves as a crucial requirement for maintaining your company’s legal standing within the state. While the prospect of handling tax matters may seem daunting, rest assured that the process can be straightforward with the right guidance. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll walk you through the steps of filing your Delaware Franchise Tax and provide insights to help you navigate the process effectively.
Personal Brand Statement:
As an Army veteran dedicated to lifelong learning, I bring a disciplined, strategic mindset to my pursuits. I am constantly expanding my knowledge to innovate and lead effectively. My journey is driven by a commitment to excellence, and to make a meaningful impact in the world.
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
RMD24 | Debunking the non-endemic revenue myth Marvin Vacquier Droop | First ...BBPMedia1
Marvin neemt je in deze presentatie mee in de voordelen van non-endemic advertising op retail media netwerken. Hij brengt ook de uitdagingen in beeld die de markt op dit moment heeft op het gebied van retail media voor niet-leveranciers.
Retail media wordt gezien als het nieuwe advertising-medium en ook mediabureaus richten massaal retail media-afdelingen op. Merken die niet in de betreffende winkel liggen staan ook nog niet in de rij om op de retail media netwerken te adverteren. Marvin belicht de uitdagingen die er zijn om echt aansluiting te vinden op die markt van non-endemic advertising.
Enterprise Excellence is Inclusive Excellence.pdfKaiNexus
Enterprise excellence and inclusive excellence are closely linked, and real-world challenges have shown that both are essential to the success of any organization. To achieve enterprise excellence, organizations must focus on improving their operations and processes while creating an inclusive environment that engages everyone. In this interactive session, the facilitator will highlight commonly established business practices and how they limit our ability to engage everyone every day. More importantly, though, participants will likely gain increased awareness of what we can do differently to maximize enterprise excellence through deliberate inclusion.
What is Enterprise Excellence?
Enterprise Excellence is a holistic approach that's aimed at achieving world-class performance across all aspects of the organization.
What might I learn?
A way to engage all in creating Inclusive Excellence. Lessons from the US military and their parallels to the story of Harry Potter. How belt systems and CI teams can destroy inclusive practices. How leadership language invites people to the party. There are three things leaders can do to engage everyone every day: maximizing psychological safety to create environments where folks learn, contribute, and challenge the status quo.
Who might benefit? Anyone and everyone leading folks from the shop floor to top floor.
Dr. William Harvey is a seasoned Operations Leader with extensive experience in chemical processing, manufacturing, and operations management. At Michelman, he currently oversees multiple sites, leading teams in strategic planning and coaching/practicing continuous improvement. William is set to start his eighth year of teaching at the University of Cincinnati where he teaches marketing, finance, and management. William holds various certifications in change management, quality, leadership, operational excellence, team building, and DiSC, among others.
3. LOGIC:
Logic may be defined as the
organized body of knowledge, or science,
that evaluates arguments
Fallacy:
A fallacy is a defect in an argument
that consists in something other than false
premises alone.
IA KHAN
4. TYPES OF FALLACIES
1: formal:
A formal fallacy is one that may be identified by
merely examining the form or structure of an
argument.
2: informal:
Informal fallacies are those that can be
detected only by examining the content of the
argument.
IA KHAN
6. Explanation:
To detect this fallacy one must know
something about IMS building—namely,
that they are large visible objects, and even
though their atomic components are
invisible, this does not mean that the
building themselves are invisible.
IA KHAN
7. Types Of Informal Fallacy
(a) Sophism:
When arguer deceives
someone intentionally.
(b) Paralogism:
When arguer deceives
someone unintentionally(misunderstanding)
IA KHAN
8. THE FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE:
The fallacies of relevance means ”when
premises of an argument are irrelevant to
the conclusion”
OR
“When premises are not irrelevant to the
reality and having no relation with claiming
point(conclusion)”
Lets go back to the example discussed
earlier…
IA KHAN
9. 1. Appeal to Force
(Argumentum ad Baculum:
Appeal to the “Stick”):
The fallacy of appeal to force occurs
whenever an argument relies on threat
rather than reason.
Threat may be DIRECT(unvieled) or
INDIRECT(vieled) that’s why it categorized
by logician into the above two types.
IA KHAN
10. Example
(a) When our Logic teacher told us always
to do your work on time e.g
assignment,presentation etc otherwise you
will not get enough marks in my subject.
(b) When we enter IMS the gatekeeper told
us that put on your ID cards otherwise Chief
proctor sir Hashim will fine you.
IA KHAN
11. 2. Appeal to Pity (Argumentum ad
Misericordiam):
When an argument relies on generosity ,
pity,sympathy, and altruism(sacrifice
oneself for the sake of other) OR If some
body prouduce pity or kindness in your
heart by saying some terms e.g Orphen
Association etc.
NOTE:
This pity may be directed toward the
arguer or toward some third party.
IA KHAN
12. Example:
When the thalassemia foundation’s
members came previous week to our
department and told us to donate blood for
the patient of thalassemia,a sympathy,pity
came in my and some of my friend’s heart
for those who are the patient of this type of
disease and we donated the blood for
thalassemia patients.
IA KHAN
13. Red herring
When an arguer divert someone attention from the
real issue or
When an arguer introduce a new topic which is not
relevant to the real issue
Example:
In government, arguing for raising taxes -
“We need more revenue to support the programs
that we have. Children are our future. Let’s support
children.”
Here increasing tax is totally diferent issue from the
youth or their future but they are diverting the
attention from the tax issue’
14. Hasty generalization
When a person moves from a particular case to
a general case. OR
when a person generalize a particular case or
event.
Example
Katrina is good actress and she wear
iron ring.
so all actress wearing iron ring are good
actress.
15. Example:
when a specific car do accident then you
considered that all car’s of that type have
done accident .
16. Tip: Don’t base decisions on small sample
sizes when much more reliable data exists.
Variation: The hasty conclusion is
leaping to a conclusion without carefully
considering the alternatives .
17. Straw man fallacy
“When a person misrepresent someone
argument or exaggerated by some one the
argument of giver”
18. Example
This is every where in politics
Romany speaks out about Obama's first
term failures.
He exaggerates Obama's administration by
comparing it to carter’s which was
remembered for inflation, energy crises, war
in Afghanistan, and hostages in Iran. This
emotional appeal tries to worsen Obama’s
image by exaggerating his position
19. Appeal to in appropriate
authority:
When we concerned with the person who is
not the right authority in that field are area
or when we concern with the person who
has not the expertise in that area.
20. Example:
01): My chemistry teacher said that Iqbal is
a good poet.
02): Army chief says that Imran khan will be
the next prime minister.
21. Composition
The fallacy of composition is committed when the
conclusion of an arrgument depends on the
erronous transference of an attribute from the part
of something onto the whole.
This fallacy arrise when the attributes of
the parts assign to the whole.
22. Example:
Some players of Pakistan team are playing
excellent, therefore the team as a whole is playing
excellent.
23. Division
The fallacy of the division is the exact
reverse of composition,
As composition is goes from parts to whole.
Division goes from whole to part.
The fallacy is committed when the
conclusion of an argument depends on
the erroneous transference of an attribute
from a whole (or a class) on to its parts (or
members).