LITERATURE REVIEW 
Bhandari et al. (1) studied slurry erosion performance study of detonation gun sprayed WC - lOCo-4Cr 
coatings on CF8M steel under hydro accelerated conditions. They investigated the erosion behavior of 
coated and bare steel on high speed erosion test rig. Silt used as abrasive media collected from actual 
working conditions of power plant and then sieved and grains of 100 urn and 300 urn were obtained. 
Parameters like rotational speed, particle size, and concentration were studied. Effect of slurry 
concentration was pronounced in bare CF8M steel due to less hardness compared to slurry particles. 
However in case of average particle size, effect was more pronounced in the coated steel. Also specific 
mass loss increases with increase in rotational speed. Eroded samples were analyzed using SEM and 
XRD.They concluded that most of erosion in CF8M steel was due to cutting/ploughing whereas in coated 
steel erosion was due to brittle fracture. 
Goyal et a1. (2) Compared slurry erosive wear of HVOF spray Cr203 coatings on CF8M and CA6NM 
turbine steel of yield strength 205 MPa and 550 MPa respectively. Silt used in slurry was of irregular 
shape and mainly Si02 particles of 1161 HV. The average particle size used was 100 μm and 300 μm. A 
High speed erosion test rig consist of erosion chamber, rotor to rotate work piece up to 5000 rpm was used 
for investigation. Effects of parameters namely, average particle size, speed (rpm) and slurry concentration 
were investigated during experiment. Specimens surface morphology were studied using SEM before and 
after of experiment to study the erosion mechanism. HVOF- sprayed Cr203 coating reduced the slurry 
erosion rate of steels Because of high hardness in comparison with uncoated steels. Slurry erosion 
resistance of both coated steels were same thus it is independent of base metal but among CF8M and 
CA6NM, CA6NM had better erosion resistance because of high hardness and yield strength. Among all 
the factors rotational speed i.e. rpm was most dominating factor in increasing the erosion rate. The main 
mechanism for material removal in uncoated steels was crater and lip formation, cutting and ploughing, 
plastic deformation and in coated steels was micro chipping at splat boundaries. 
Saleh and Ahmed (3) investigated slurry erosion-corrosion of carburized AISI 5117 steel. Slurry used for 
investigation was composed of sand particle and water or 3% NaCI solution. Erodent used was mainly 
silica and sieved to size of 250 um -355 urn. Erosion test was performed on
whirling arm ring. Two specimen's holders were mounted at the end of the arm which was attached to 
the rotor. Slurry stream velocity was 1.6 m/s at any preset angle between 0°-90°. Microstructure of 
carburized steel was investigated using SEM. which shows microstructure was completely martensit ic 
near the surface due to high carbon content and case depth was 0.65 mm. They concluded that maximum 
erosion was at impinging angle of 45° and erosion-corrosion resistance was improved by 40-60% by 
carburizing. Both treated and untreated material behaves as ductile material under erosion test. SEM 
showed that erosion tracks were wider and deeper for untreated specimens and shallower for treated 
ones. 
Grewal et al. (2012) compared the slurry erosion of hydro turbine steels (I6Cr5Ni and 13Cr5Ni) with 
and without detonation gun spray coatings using Taguchi technique. Samples of both steels were coated 
with WC-lOCo-4Cr using detonation gun with a particle size of 15 to 45 μm. SEM/EDS. XRD techniques 
were used for an in depth characterization of coated samples. SEM indicated laminar splat like 
morphology of coated samples and XRD showed the WC as primary phase along with W2C and C06W6C 
as secondary phase. Hardness of coatings was found to be 4 to 5 times of base metal. Slurry erosion test 
was conducted using jet type test rig to ascertain the slurry erosion behavior of coated and bare steel 
samples. The effect of parameters like velocity, impact angle, concentration of slurry and particle size 
was studied. Erodent used for testing was collected from hydropower plant to replicate the actual 
conditions. They concluded, in case of bare samples velocity and particle size was dominating factors 
but in case of coated samples velocity was the dominating factor. Also bare 16/5 steel had better slurry 
erosion as compared to 13/4 steel. SEM images showed for bare steel erosion mechanism was plastic 
deformation and for coated steels removal of material was due to formation and interlinking of cracks. 
Basba et al. (2013) improved the slurry erosiom wear resistance of 16Cr-5Ni martensite steel by laser 
surface alloying (LSA) and laser transformation hardening (LTH). Co based Wallex-50 and Ni-based 
Tribaloy- 700 powders were used for coating of steel by LTH and LSA respectively. Microstructures of 
samples were observed using SEM, Tribaloy-700 coated showed hard intermetallic laves phase dispersed 
in nickel eutectic and Wallex-50 was composed of needle of alpha solution distributed in beta solid 
solution. Erosion test was performed on jet type test rig with abrasive size of 200 μm. The effect of 
parameters like angle of impingement and velocity were studied. They concluded cumulative loss was 
higher for 16Cr-5Ni steel as compared to
laser treated steel for impingement angle of 30°. Laser treated steel had high resistance to wear by 1.5-3 
times as compared to substrate 16Cr-5Ni steel for all angles of impingement because of high hardness. 
The erosion mechanism for both Tribaloy-700 and Wallex-50 was plastic deformation while for substrate 
crater lips and cutting action were main mechanisms. 
Bhandari et al. (2011) investigated the slurry erosion behavior of detonation gun sprayed Al203 and 
A1203- 13Ti02 coating on CF8M steel under hydro accelerated conditions. Hollow cylindrical specimens 
were used for erosion test. They studied the effect of parameters like average particle size, concentration 
of slurry and rotational speed. Slurry was collected from hydro power plant to achieve actual replica of 
slurry erosion condition. They concluded slurry concentration and average particle were dominating factor 
in the slurry of Al203 coated steel while rotational speed was dominating factor in A1203-I3Ti02 coated 
steel. A1203-13Ti02 coated steel result much better resistance to erosion as compared to Al203 because 
of high toughness of Al203- I 3Ti02 coated steel. Erosion rate of both coatings increased was increased 
with change in slurry concentration from 10,000-30,000 ppm. 
Lynn et al. studied the effect of slurry particle size on slurry erosion using a pot tester at a constant velocity 
18.7 m/s on steel specimen. Slurry was prepared by mixing 1.2% by weight of silica carbide in oil for 
different diameter ranging from 2011 t050Il. They conclude that for particles sizes greater than about 
10011 the erosion rate was proportional to the kinetic energy dissipated by particles during impact but for 
particles size less than 10011 other metal removal mechanism become increasingly significant. Both 
collision efficiency and impact velocity of particles decreased with decreasing particles size. 
Lin and Shao studied the effect of velocity on erosion wear in a newly designed erosion tester using 
equisized sand-water slurry. The velocity was varied between 10 m/s and 70 m/s and impact angle between 
15° and 90°. Four specimens (pure aluminium, 1020 steel, high chromium and cast iron) were tested at a 
constant concentration of Cw = 5%. They found that the velocity exponent increase with increasing 
impingement angle and decreased with increasing hardness. Velocity exponent in the ranges of 1.87-2.48 
were observed for different impingement angles and different materials. At 90° impingement angle, the 
indexes of velocity for erosion wear for aluminium was2.48 where for the chromium it was 2. I 7. This 
implies that with increase in hardness of the test material, the exponent of velocity decreases.
INTRODUCTION 
Slurry erosion is defined as degradation of surfaces upon interaction with solid particles entrained in liquid 
medium. This erosion occur either material moves through slurry or slurry impinges on the material at 
certain velocity. Slurry erodes by the action of abrasive particles in liquid which result in the action of 
wear of material depend upon the conditions to which the system is exposed. Slurry erosion is major 
problem for the industries which deal with liquids having abrasive particles. When such a mixture of liquid 
and sand particles comes in the contact of material surface, surface get eroded by these particles. 
FACTORS AFFECTING SLURRY EROSION 
There are several factors which contribute towards the degradation of the surface and removal of material 
due to slurry erosion. These factors decide which type of erosion mechanism will be the dominating factor 
in the material removal process. Several types of factors are: 
 Factors depending on the operating conditions are velocity, concentration, impact angle, 
temperature etc. 
 Factors that depend on erodent's are particle size, particle shape, hardness etc. 
 Factors that depend on the properties of target surface are hardness, microstructure, mechanica l 
properties etc. 
EROSION MECHANISMS IN SLURRY EROSION 
Various erosion mechanisms responsible for the loss of material in slurry erosion are: 
 Cutting erosion 
 Ploughing erosion 
 Platelet mechanism 
 Subsurface deformation and cracking 
SLURRY EROSION IN HYDROPOWER PLANTS 
The hydro power plants suffer fi'OI11 a very big problem of slurry erosion as the sand particle flow along 
the water. The sand particles not only reduce the efficiency of the turbines but also destroy the turbine
components. In India, hydropower plants located in the Himalayan region are severely affected by slurry 
erosion. India alone faces the loss of around US $120-150 mil lion due to silt erosion. Hydropower plant 
of China and Nepal also suffers the higher degree of damage due to slurry erosion. Problem of erosion 
becomes severe in rainy season when the concentration of sand particles becomes 3, 00,000-1,000,000 
ppm. In such conditions power plant does not work and shut down during high concentration period. 
Hydropower plants normally work up to the concentration of sand around 5,000 ppm. The various parts 
of hydropower plant which are affected by slurry erosion are impellers, guide vanes, buckets, nozzles, 
spears and labyrinth seal. The material mainly used for hydro turbine are CA6NM, CF8M, 13Cr J Ni and 
16Cr5Ni steels. Among these CA6NM is preferably used, owing its good resistance against corrosion, 
cavitation erosion, high impact and fracture toughness. Commonly used material for different parts of 
turbine are: 
S.NO. COMPONENTS MATERIALS 
1. Runner A S T M 7 4 3 -13Cr5Ni, SEW 410-16Cr5Ni 
2. Labyrinth seal A S T M 7 4 3-J3Cr5Ni, 18CrIONi, SEW 410-J6Cr5Ni 
3. Guide vane ASTM743-13Cr5Ni 
4. Liner ASTM743-13CrSNi 
5. Rubber seals Neoprene synthetic rubber 
6. Draft tube SEW 41 0-16Cr5Ni, W-1.0566 
The problem is not only the erosion, but many other kinds of factors which harm the material in one way 
or the other. The material gets corroded very readily which weakens it and with successive flow of slurry 
it erodes the material. So the need of the day is to look after this serious problem and take necessary 
protective measures against the same. The material used should have proper strength and should not erode 
readily. Some features that the material should possess are high tensile strength, high hardness, resistance 
to corrosion, etc. If the material alone is not enough, a coating of suitable material should be applied on 
the substrate material to avoid erosion. Coating is a common measure taken into consideration for 
manufacturing of any part of even a simplest machine. Before coating a material it should be taken into 
consideration, for what purpose the coated material is to be used. If it has to be subjected to some solid 
particle erosion it should have high strength and if it has to be subjected to some corrosive environme nt 
the coating done must be of corrosion resisting features.

Literature review

  • 1.
    LITERATURE REVIEW Bhandariet al. (1) studied slurry erosion performance study of detonation gun sprayed WC - lOCo-4Cr coatings on CF8M steel under hydro accelerated conditions. They investigated the erosion behavior of coated and bare steel on high speed erosion test rig. Silt used as abrasive media collected from actual working conditions of power plant and then sieved and grains of 100 urn and 300 urn were obtained. Parameters like rotational speed, particle size, and concentration were studied. Effect of slurry concentration was pronounced in bare CF8M steel due to less hardness compared to slurry particles. However in case of average particle size, effect was more pronounced in the coated steel. Also specific mass loss increases with increase in rotational speed. Eroded samples were analyzed using SEM and XRD.They concluded that most of erosion in CF8M steel was due to cutting/ploughing whereas in coated steel erosion was due to brittle fracture. Goyal et a1. (2) Compared slurry erosive wear of HVOF spray Cr203 coatings on CF8M and CA6NM turbine steel of yield strength 205 MPa and 550 MPa respectively. Silt used in slurry was of irregular shape and mainly Si02 particles of 1161 HV. The average particle size used was 100 μm and 300 μm. A High speed erosion test rig consist of erosion chamber, rotor to rotate work piece up to 5000 rpm was used for investigation. Effects of parameters namely, average particle size, speed (rpm) and slurry concentration were investigated during experiment. Specimens surface morphology were studied using SEM before and after of experiment to study the erosion mechanism. HVOF- sprayed Cr203 coating reduced the slurry erosion rate of steels Because of high hardness in comparison with uncoated steels. Slurry erosion resistance of both coated steels were same thus it is independent of base metal but among CF8M and CA6NM, CA6NM had better erosion resistance because of high hardness and yield strength. Among all the factors rotational speed i.e. rpm was most dominating factor in increasing the erosion rate. The main mechanism for material removal in uncoated steels was crater and lip formation, cutting and ploughing, plastic deformation and in coated steels was micro chipping at splat boundaries. Saleh and Ahmed (3) investigated slurry erosion-corrosion of carburized AISI 5117 steel. Slurry used for investigation was composed of sand particle and water or 3% NaCI solution. Erodent used was mainly silica and sieved to size of 250 um -355 urn. Erosion test was performed on
  • 2.
    whirling arm ring.Two specimen's holders were mounted at the end of the arm which was attached to the rotor. Slurry stream velocity was 1.6 m/s at any preset angle between 0°-90°. Microstructure of carburized steel was investigated using SEM. which shows microstructure was completely martensit ic near the surface due to high carbon content and case depth was 0.65 mm. They concluded that maximum erosion was at impinging angle of 45° and erosion-corrosion resistance was improved by 40-60% by carburizing. Both treated and untreated material behaves as ductile material under erosion test. SEM showed that erosion tracks were wider and deeper for untreated specimens and shallower for treated ones. Grewal et al. (2012) compared the slurry erosion of hydro turbine steels (I6Cr5Ni and 13Cr5Ni) with and without detonation gun spray coatings using Taguchi technique. Samples of both steels were coated with WC-lOCo-4Cr using detonation gun with a particle size of 15 to 45 μm. SEM/EDS. XRD techniques were used for an in depth characterization of coated samples. SEM indicated laminar splat like morphology of coated samples and XRD showed the WC as primary phase along with W2C and C06W6C as secondary phase. Hardness of coatings was found to be 4 to 5 times of base metal. Slurry erosion test was conducted using jet type test rig to ascertain the slurry erosion behavior of coated and bare steel samples. The effect of parameters like velocity, impact angle, concentration of slurry and particle size was studied. Erodent used for testing was collected from hydropower plant to replicate the actual conditions. They concluded, in case of bare samples velocity and particle size was dominating factors but in case of coated samples velocity was the dominating factor. Also bare 16/5 steel had better slurry erosion as compared to 13/4 steel. SEM images showed for bare steel erosion mechanism was plastic deformation and for coated steels removal of material was due to formation and interlinking of cracks. Basba et al. (2013) improved the slurry erosiom wear resistance of 16Cr-5Ni martensite steel by laser surface alloying (LSA) and laser transformation hardening (LTH). Co based Wallex-50 and Ni-based Tribaloy- 700 powders were used for coating of steel by LTH and LSA respectively. Microstructures of samples were observed using SEM, Tribaloy-700 coated showed hard intermetallic laves phase dispersed in nickel eutectic and Wallex-50 was composed of needle of alpha solution distributed in beta solid solution. Erosion test was performed on jet type test rig with abrasive size of 200 μm. The effect of parameters like angle of impingement and velocity were studied. They concluded cumulative loss was higher for 16Cr-5Ni steel as compared to
  • 3.
    laser treated steelfor impingement angle of 30°. Laser treated steel had high resistance to wear by 1.5-3 times as compared to substrate 16Cr-5Ni steel for all angles of impingement because of high hardness. The erosion mechanism for both Tribaloy-700 and Wallex-50 was plastic deformation while for substrate crater lips and cutting action were main mechanisms. Bhandari et al. (2011) investigated the slurry erosion behavior of detonation gun sprayed Al203 and A1203- 13Ti02 coating on CF8M steel under hydro accelerated conditions. Hollow cylindrical specimens were used for erosion test. They studied the effect of parameters like average particle size, concentration of slurry and rotational speed. Slurry was collected from hydro power plant to achieve actual replica of slurry erosion condition. They concluded slurry concentration and average particle were dominating factor in the slurry of Al203 coated steel while rotational speed was dominating factor in A1203-I3Ti02 coated steel. A1203-13Ti02 coated steel result much better resistance to erosion as compared to Al203 because of high toughness of Al203- I 3Ti02 coated steel. Erosion rate of both coatings increased was increased with change in slurry concentration from 10,000-30,000 ppm. Lynn et al. studied the effect of slurry particle size on slurry erosion using a pot tester at a constant velocity 18.7 m/s on steel specimen. Slurry was prepared by mixing 1.2% by weight of silica carbide in oil for different diameter ranging from 2011 t050Il. They conclude that for particles sizes greater than about 10011 the erosion rate was proportional to the kinetic energy dissipated by particles during impact but for particles size less than 10011 other metal removal mechanism become increasingly significant. Both collision efficiency and impact velocity of particles decreased with decreasing particles size. Lin and Shao studied the effect of velocity on erosion wear in a newly designed erosion tester using equisized sand-water slurry. The velocity was varied between 10 m/s and 70 m/s and impact angle between 15° and 90°. Four specimens (pure aluminium, 1020 steel, high chromium and cast iron) were tested at a constant concentration of Cw = 5%. They found that the velocity exponent increase with increasing impingement angle and decreased with increasing hardness. Velocity exponent in the ranges of 1.87-2.48 were observed for different impingement angles and different materials. At 90° impingement angle, the indexes of velocity for erosion wear for aluminium was2.48 where for the chromium it was 2. I 7. This implies that with increase in hardness of the test material, the exponent of velocity decreases.
  • 4.
    INTRODUCTION Slurry erosionis defined as degradation of surfaces upon interaction with solid particles entrained in liquid medium. This erosion occur either material moves through slurry or slurry impinges on the material at certain velocity. Slurry erodes by the action of abrasive particles in liquid which result in the action of wear of material depend upon the conditions to which the system is exposed. Slurry erosion is major problem for the industries which deal with liquids having abrasive particles. When such a mixture of liquid and sand particles comes in the contact of material surface, surface get eroded by these particles. FACTORS AFFECTING SLURRY EROSION There are several factors which contribute towards the degradation of the surface and removal of material due to slurry erosion. These factors decide which type of erosion mechanism will be the dominating factor in the material removal process. Several types of factors are:  Factors depending on the operating conditions are velocity, concentration, impact angle, temperature etc.  Factors that depend on erodent's are particle size, particle shape, hardness etc.  Factors that depend on the properties of target surface are hardness, microstructure, mechanica l properties etc. EROSION MECHANISMS IN SLURRY EROSION Various erosion mechanisms responsible for the loss of material in slurry erosion are:  Cutting erosion  Ploughing erosion  Platelet mechanism  Subsurface deformation and cracking SLURRY EROSION IN HYDROPOWER PLANTS The hydro power plants suffer fi'OI11 a very big problem of slurry erosion as the sand particle flow along the water. The sand particles not only reduce the efficiency of the turbines but also destroy the turbine
  • 5.
    components. In India,hydropower plants located in the Himalayan region are severely affected by slurry erosion. India alone faces the loss of around US $120-150 mil lion due to silt erosion. Hydropower plant of China and Nepal also suffers the higher degree of damage due to slurry erosion. Problem of erosion becomes severe in rainy season when the concentration of sand particles becomes 3, 00,000-1,000,000 ppm. In such conditions power plant does not work and shut down during high concentration period. Hydropower plants normally work up to the concentration of sand around 5,000 ppm. The various parts of hydropower plant which are affected by slurry erosion are impellers, guide vanes, buckets, nozzles, spears and labyrinth seal. The material mainly used for hydro turbine are CA6NM, CF8M, 13Cr J Ni and 16Cr5Ni steels. Among these CA6NM is preferably used, owing its good resistance against corrosion, cavitation erosion, high impact and fracture toughness. Commonly used material for different parts of turbine are: S.NO. COMPONENTS MATERIALS 1. Runner A S T M 7 4 3 -13Cr5Ni, SEW 410-16Cr5Ni 2. Labyrinth seal A S T M 7 4 3-J3Cr5Ni, 18CrIONi, SEW 410-J6Cr5Ni 3. Guide vane ASTM743-13Cr5Ni 4. Liner ASTM743-13CrSNi 5. Rubber seals Neoprene synthetic rubber 6. Draft tube SEW 41 0-16Cr5Ni, W-1.0566 The problem is not only the erosion, but many other kinds of factors which harm the material in one way or the other. The material gets corroded very readily which weakens it and with successive flow of slurry it erodes the material. So the need of the day is to look after this serious problem and take necessary protective measures against the same. The material used should have proper strength and should not erode readily. Some features that the material should possess are high tensile strength, high hardness, resistance to corrosion, etc. If the material alone is not enough, a coating of suitable material should be applied on the substrate material to avoid erosion. Coating is a common measure taken into consideration for manufacturing of any part of even a simplest machine. Before coating a material it should be taken into consideration, for what purpose the coated material is to be used. If it has to be subjected to some solid particle erosion it should have high strength and if it has to be subjected to some corrosive environme nt the coating done must be of corrosion resisting features.