ENERGY CONSERVATION = FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE A COMPARISON OF COMPACT FLUORESCENT AND INCANDESCENT BULBS BY JONI JOHNSON, PETERSBURG MAT STUDENT
LIGHTING What type of light do you use in your home? How much do you spend on lighting in your home? If you could save, would you?
STUDY OBJECTIVES $$$$ = the fiscally conservative conservationist Having heard that compact fluorescent bulbs save energy, and having heard that they cost more money…
STUDY OBJECTIVES We set out to find The difference in kilowatt hour (kWh) consumption between the two bulbs The different in cost between the two bulbs When, and if, over the life of the two bulbs the compact fluorescent would be more cost effective than the incandescent bulbs
LIGHTING The typical household averages an estimated 25, 40-watt incandescent light bulbs*  Therefore we selected 40-watt bulbs as our base for this study *(sampled from four integrated science students’ homes, so not representative)
STUDY METHODS To determine the difference in kWh consumption we: Searched the web to find a trustworthy source of Lumens Watts (W) Bulb lifespan in hours
STUDY METHODS To determine the difference in cost between the two bulbs we: Located the cheapest supplier for both bulb types Contacted the Petersburg Utility for current kWh rates
STUDY METHODS To determine when the compact fluorescent would be more cost effective than the incandescent bulb we: Combined the above two methods and calculated away…
LIGHTING RESULTS The 40-watt incandescent is slightly less bright than the 11-watt compact fluorescent 505 lumens compared to 660 lumens, respectively
LIGHTING RESULTS The 40-watt bulb has an estimated lifespan of 1000 hours The 11-watt compact fluorescent has an estimated lifespan of 15000 hours
RESULTS:  CONSUMPTION KWH CONSUMPTION COMPARISON: per 1000 hours The 40W incandescent bulb consumes 40 kWh The 11W compact fluorescent bulb consumes 11 kWh
RESULTS:  CONSUMPTION Extrapolated over the lifespan of the compact fluorescent bulb (15000 hours)…
RESULTS:  CONSUMPTION Over the lifespan of the compact fluorescent bulb 15 incandescent bulbs have been used 600 kWh have been consumed by the incandescent bulb as opposed to 165 kWh by the compact fluorescent
RESULTS:  COST COST $$$ The 40W incandescent bulb costs roughly $ 0.84/bulb The 11W compact fluorescent bulb costs roughly $2.19/bulb
RESULTS:  COST With 15 incandescent bulbs lasting as long as 1 compact fluorescent… $0.84*15 = $12.60 As opposed to $2.10
RESULTS:  COST FISCALLY SOUND Between two and three 40W incandescent bulbs expire and the compact fluorescent pays for itself
COST:  ENERGY CONSUMPTION At the current 11.3 cents/kWh in Petersburg: Over 1000 hours A 40W incandescent costs $4.52 A 11W compact costs $1.24
COST:  ENERGY CONSUMPTION With the purchase price of 0.84/bulb for the 40W incandescent 2.19/bulb for the 11W compact The cost per 1000 hours = $5.36 using the 40W incandescent $3.43 using the 11W compact
FISCALLY AND ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSERVATIVE
FISCALLY AND ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSERVATIVE Back to our  estimated 25 bulbs per household…
FISCALLY AND ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSERVATIVE
FISCALLY AND ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSERVATIVE A household that currently uses 25, 40W incandescent bulbs Would save    $932!!!! Over 10,000 hours of use If they used compact fluorescent bulbs
CONCLUSIONS In spite of the initial high purchase price Brighter compact fluorescent bulbs pay for themselves within one year
CONCLUSIONS - SO SIMPLE? If you do not leave a compact fluorescent bulb on for at least five minutes The lifespan decreases signficantly
CONCLUSIONS - SO SIMPLE? Compact fluorescent bulbs contain small amounts of mercury They need to be disposed of at the proper facility Such facility you’re not likely to encounter in Petersburg Hmmm…  A dilemma.
references Jim Nelson, Petersburg Municipal Utility www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=cfls.pr_cfls http://energyhawk.com/lights/lights2.php

LIGHTING_ENERGY_CONSERVATION

  • 1.
    ENERGY CONSERVATION =FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE A COMPARISON OF COMPACT FLUORESCENT AND INCANDESCENT BULBS BY JONI JOHNSON, PETERSBURG MAT STUDENT
  • 2.
    LIGHTING What typeof light do you use in your home? How much do you spend on lighting in your home? If you could save, would you?
  • 3.
    STUDY OBJECTIVES $$$$= the fiscally conservative conservationist Having heard that compact fluorescent bulbs save energy, and having heard that they cost more money…
  • 4.
    STUDY OBJECTIVES Weset out to find The difference in kilowatt hour (kWh) consumption between the two bulbs The different in cost between the two bulbs When, and if, over the life of the two bulbs the compact fluorescent would be more cost effective than the incandescent bulbs
  • 5.
    LIGHTING The typicalhousehold averages an estimated 25, 40-watt incandescent light bulbs* Therefore we selected 40-watt bulbs as our base for this study *(sampled from four integrated science students’ homes, so not representative)
  • 6.
    STUDY METHODS Todetermine the difference in kWh consumption we: Searched the web to find a trustworthy source of Lumens Watts (W) Bulb lifespan in hours
  • 7.
    STUDY METHODS Todetermine the difference in cost between the two bulbs we: Located the cheapest supplier for both bulb types Contacted the Petersburg Utility for current kWh rates
  • 8.
    STUDY METHODS Todetermine when the compact fluorescent would be more cost effective than the incandescent bulb we: Combined the above two methods and calculated away…
  • 9.
    LIGHTING RESULTS The40-watt incandescent is slightly less bright than the 11-watt compact fluorescent 505 lumens compared to 660 lumens, respectively
  • 10.
    LIGHTING RESULTS The40-watt bulb has an estimated lifespan of 1000 hours The 11-watt compact fluorescent has an estimated lifespan of 15000 hours
  • 11.
    RESULTS: CONSUMPTIONKWH CONSUMPTION COMPARISON: per 1000 hours The 40W incandescent bulb consumes 40 kWh The 11W compact fluorescent bulb consumes 11 kWh
  • 12.
    RESULTS: CONSUMPTIONExtrapolated over the lifespan of the compact fluorescent bulb (15000 hours)…
  • 13.
    RESULTS: CONSUMPTIONOver the lifespan of the compact fluorescent bulb 15 incandescent bulbs have been used 600 kWh have been consumed by the incandescent bulb as opposed to 165 kWh by the compact fluorescent
  • 14.
    RESULTS: COSTCOST $$$ The 40W incandescent bulb costs roughly $ 0.84/bulb The 11W compact fluorescent bulb costs roughly $2.19/bulb
  • 15.
    RESULTS: COSTWith 15 incandescent bulbs lasting as long as 1 compact fluorescent… $0.84*15 = $12.60 As opposed to $2.10
  • 16.
    RESULTS: COSTFISCALLY SOUND Between two and three 40W incandescent bulbs expire and the compact fluorescent pays for itself
  • 17.
    COST: ENERGYCONSUMPTION At the current 11.3 cents/kWh in Petersburg: Over 1000 hours A 40W incandescent costs $4.52 A 11W compact costs $1.24
  • 18.
    COST: ENERGYCONSUMPTION With the purchase price of 0.84/bulb for the 40W incandescent 2.19/bulb for the 11W compact The cost per 1000 hours = $5.36 using the 40W incandescent $3.43 using the 11W compact
  • 19.
  • 20.
    FISCALLY AND ENVIRONMENTALLYCONSERVATIVE Back to our estimated 25 bulbs per household…
  • 21.
  • 22.
    FISCALLY AND ENVIRONMENTALLYCONSERVATIVE A household that currently uses 25, 40W incandescent bulbs Would save $932!!!! Over 10,000 hours of use If they used compact fluorescent bulbs
  • 23.
    CONCLUSIONS In spiteof the initial high purchase price Brighter compact fluorescent bulbs pay for themselves within one year
  • 24.
    CONCLUSIONS - SOSIMPLE? If you do not leave a compact fluorescent bulb on for at least five minutes The lifespan decreases signficantly
  • 25.
    CONCLUSIONS - SOSIMPLE? Compact fluorescent bulbs contain small amounts of mercury They need to be disposed of at the proper facility Such facility you’re not likely to encounter in Petersburg Hmmm… A dilemma.
  • 26.
    references Jim Nelson,Petersburg Municipal Utility www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=cfls.pr_cfls http://energyhawk.com/lights/lights2.php