LIBR 250 Week 7
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•716 views
This document discusses evaluating information sources and provides guidance on criteria to consider. It notes that while finding information is easy, evaluating it for credibility and appropriateness requires more intellectual effort. Critical analysis depends on understanding how information is created and disseminated. Different types of resources like journals, websites, books and reference sources must all be evaluated for authority, credibility, currentness and appropriateness. Key factors include an author's credentials, the publisher, intended audience, date of publication, and purpose and scope. Evaluating information sources is presented as a common sense process.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Evaluating sources psy2600
This document discusses evaluating the authority and credibility of information sources. It emphasizes thinking critically about the author, purpose, and context of information. Authority is constructed based on what communities recognize as authoritative, and is contextual based on the information need. When evaluating sources, it is important to consider the author's credentials, potential biases, citations used, and accuracy of information. The purpose and relevance of the source should also be taken into account.
21st Century Research Part 1 (Summer 2012)
The document discusses different types of academic sources and how to evaluate online sources for research. It notes that academic sources are authoritative, cite other work, are peer-reviewed by other academics, present information objectively, and are written for other academics rather than a general audience. Some examples of academic sources given are journals, books from scholarly publishers, and certain websites from professional organizations. The document provides guidance on evaluating online sources based on their credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and level of support or documentation. It also offers tips for using Wikipedia as a starting point for research but not as an academic source, as well as strategies for conducting active web research.
Lesson 4: Evaluating Sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources. It introduces several models for evaluating sources, including the CRAAP test and the relevance/credibility model. The CRAAP test examines the currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose of a source. Additional factors discussed for evaluating sources include the author's qualifications, whether the information has been peer reviewed, potential biases, and accuracy. Students are encouraged to consider these criteria when evaluating both online and print sources for a research task or assignment. The document stresses the importance of carefully evaluating all sources, especially web-based materials, given the open nature of online information.
Evaluating Online Sources
CARS is a method for evaluating the credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and support of online and print sources. It stands for credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and support. For credibility, one should consider the author's expertise and credentials. For accuracy, check publication dates and comprehensiveness. For reasonableness, consider the author's bias, worldview, and treatment of multiple sides. For support, review listed sources and other authors' opinions of the work. Using CARS helps determine if a source is worth researching and can also guide one's own writing.
Ib research show
This document discusses finding credible sources and properly citing resources. It defines peer-reviewed sources as ones that have been evaluated by experts in the field. Refereed journals are publications where experts critically evaluate submissions before publication. The document provides tips for evaluating credibility of web sources based on domain names like .edu or .gov. It stresses the importance of citing sources to avoid plagiarism and provides NoodleTools.com as a citation help resource.
Eng 102 - General
This document provides guidance on conducting academic research. It outlines five key steps: identifying and focusing a topic, locating background information from various credible sources, evaluating sources, citing sources, and writing throughout the process. It emphasizes developing keywords related to the research question and avoiding subjective or vague terms. When searching, it recommends avoiding complex phrases or acronyms and using connecting words like "and" and "or". Finally, it differentiates source types by credibility and intended audience, noting academic journal articles and books as the most authoritative sources.
Craap test chico
The CRAAP Test is a tool to help evaluate the quality and reliability of information found through research. It consists of five evaluation criteria: Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. For each criteria, there are questions provided to analyze different aspects of the information source. For example, for Authority the questions consider who authored the content and their credentials, and for Accuracy it examines where the information comes from and whether evidence is cited. Applying the CRAAP Test criteria can help determine whether a source is trustworthy and suitable to use for research needs.
Chapter 8 Wadsworth - Thinking Critically
Critical thinking is necessary to evaluate information effectively. It involves distinguishing facts from opinions, evaluating supporting evidence, and detecting bias. Facts can be proven true or false, while opinions are subjective judgments that can be supported by evidence from reliable sources. Not all information is accurate, as some writers have political or commercial biases and use emotionally charged language to influence readers regardless of the facts. Developing critical thinking skills allows one to analyze information rigorously and discern what is most important.
Recommended
Evaluating sources psy2600
This document discusses evaluating the authority and credibility of information sources. It emphasizes thinking critically about the author, purpose, and context of information. Authority is constructed based on what communities recognize as authoritative, and is contextual based on the information need. When evaluating sources, it is important to consider the author's credentials, potential biases, citations used, and accuracy of information. The purpose and relevance of the source should also be taken into account.
21st Century Research Part 1 (Summer 2012)
The document discusses different types of academic sources and how to evaluate online sources for research. It notes that academic sources are authoritative, cite other work, are peer-reviewed by other academics, present information objectively, and are written for other academics rather than a general audience. Some examples of academic sources given are journals, books from scholarly publishers, and certain websites from professional organizations. The document provides guidance on evaluating online sources based on their credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and level of support or documentation. It also offers tips for using Wikipedia as a starting point for research but not as an academic source, as well as strategies for conducting active web research.
Lesson 4: Evaluating Sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources. It introduces several models for evaluating sources, including the CRAAP test and the relevance/credibility model. The CRAAP test examines the currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose of a source. Additional factors discussed for evaluating sources include the author's qualifications, whether the information has been peer reviewed, potential biases, and accuracy. Students are encouraged to consider these criteria when evaluating both online and print sources for a research task or assignment. The document stresses the importance of carefully evaluating all sources, especially web-based materials, given the open nature of online information.
Evaluating Online Sources
CARS is a method for evaluating the credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and support of online and print sources. It stands for credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and support. For credibility, one should consider the author's expertise and credentials. For accuracy, check publication dates and comprehensiveness. For reasonableness, consider the author's bias, worldview, and treatment of multiple sides. For support, review listed sources and other authors' opinions of the work. Using CARS helps determine if a source is worth researching and can also guide one's own writing.
Ib research show
This document discusses finding credible sources and properly citing resources. It defines peer-reviewed sources as ones that have been evaluated by experts in the field. Refereed journals are publications where experts critically evaluate submissions before publication. The document provides tips for evaluating credibility of web sources based on domain names like .edu or .gov. It stresses the importance of citing sources to avoid plagiarism and provides NoodleTools.com as a citation help resource.
Eng 102 - General
This document provides guidance on conducting academic research. It outlines five key steps: identifying and focusing a topic, locating background information from various credible sources, evaluating sources, citing sources, and writing throughout the process. It emphasizes developing keywords related to the research question and avoiding subjective or vague terms. When searching, it recommends avoiding complex phrases or acronyms and using connecting words like "and" and "or". Finally, it differentiates source types by credibility and intended audience, noting academic journal articles and books as the most authoritative sources.
Craap test chico
The CRAAP Test is a tool to help evaluate the quality and reliability of information found through research. It consists of five evaluation criteria: Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. For each criteria, there are questions provided to analyze different aspects of the information source. For example, for Authority the questions consider who authored the content and their credentials, and for Accuracy it examines where the information comes from and whether evidence is cited. Applying the CRAAP Test criteria can help determine whether a source is trustworthy and suitable to use for research needs.
Chapter 8 Wadsworth - Thinking Critically
Critical thinking is necessary to evaluate information effectively. It involves distinguishing facts from opinions, evaluating supporting evidence, and detecting bias. Facts can be proven true or false, while opinions are subjective judgments that can be supported by evidence from reliable sources. Not all information is accurate, as some writers have political or commercial biases and use emotionally charged language to influence readers regardless of the facts. Developing critical thinking skills allows one to analyze information rigorously and discern what is most important.
ACRL Framework & The Common Core
This document provides a crosswalk between the six frames of the ACRL Framework and the Common Core Anchor Standards. For each frame, it lists the relevant Anchor Standards and provides a brief definition of the frame. The frames address concepts like authority of information, the process of information creation, the value of information, research as an iterative inquiry, scholarship as an ongoing conversation, and searching as a nonlinear exploration.
Citing sources psychology
The document discusses citing sources and using APA citation style. It notes that citing sources allows readers to evaluate the credibility of evidence, know where information came from, and give proper credit. It provides basics of citing websites and studies/articles in APA style, including author, date, title, and source. A link is included to access a guide on citing different types of information using APA style.
Eval websites
The document introduces the CRAAP test, which is a list of questions to help evaluate information found during searches. The CRAAP test criteria includes currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. Different criteria may be more important depending on the situation or need. The document then lists questions for each criteria to help determine the quality and reliability of information.
Evaluating websites
This document provides criteria for evaluating the credibility and reliability of websites for research purposes. It discusses evaluating the author's credentials, whether the content cites references, the purpose and potential biases of the site, how current the information is, and the website domain. Wikipedia can be used to gain initial understanding of a topic and find keywords and references, but should not be cited directly - the original sources from Wikipedia's references should be evaluated and used instead.
what_is_my_h_index.pptx
This document provides instructions for finding citation counts and h-index based on Google Scholar using the Publish or Perish software. It instructs the user to download Publish or Perish from a provided link, search by author name in the software, and mark papers to view results including papers, citations, citations per paper, h-index and more.
Evaluating Sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources for reliability and accuracy when conducting research. It discusses the differences between primary and secondary sources and emphasizes the importance of considering the copyright/publication date, author credentials, intended audience and purpose, factual accuracy by checking cited sources and comparing to other research, potential bias through persuasive language, selective facts, or flawed research. The document also defines plagiarism and provides methods for properly citing sources such as using quotes, parenthetical citations, and a works cited page.
Evaluating information!
The document discusses the CRAAP test, a method for evaluating information found during research. The CRAAP test involves asking questions about the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose of a source. It helps determine whether a source is reliable and worthwhile to use. Some criteria may be more important than others depending on how the information will be used. Questions address the timeliness, importance, author credentials, reliability, and intended purpose of the information. The CRAAP test is a tool for critically evaluating sources before determining if they should be included in research.
Evaluating information handout
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources using the CRAAP test. The CRAAP test consists of five factors to consider when determining if a source is reliable and credible enough to use for a research paper: Currency (how up-to-date is the information), Relevancy (how well does the information fit the research topic), Authority (the qualifications and bias of the author/publisher), Accuracy (is the information supported and peer-reviewed), and Purpose (is the information objective or does it have bias). Students should apply these criteria to choose sources that are most appropriate and helpful for accomplishing their research goals.
I-Metrics: biblio-, web-, alt- & usage- metrics
A atual revolução na avaliação de pesquisa é devido a uma série de fatores que estão presentes há vários anos, mas que agora estão convergindo para oferecer um novo cenário onde a presença na web das iniciativas em Acesso Aberto, dos repositórios institucionais, dos portais de periódicos e dos pesquisadores individuais desempenha um papel muito importante. O ranking de Universidades Webometrics há muito tempo antecipou muitas das novidades teóricas e práticas e suas ferramentas ainda são valiosas para descrever os novos processos científicos e sociais que estão afetando não só a academia, mas a todos os atores ligados de alguma forma para o avanço científico, a disseminação das atividades, a divulgação dos resultados e implementação socioeconômica das inovações.
The current revolution in research assessment is due to a series of factors that have been present for several years but that now are converging for offering a new scenario where the Open Access initiatives, the institutional repositories, the portals of journals and the researchers individual web presence are to play a very important role. Webometrics long ago anticipated many of the theoretical and practical novelties and its tools are still valuable for describing the new scientific and social processes that are affecting not only to the academia but to all the actors linked in one or other way to the scientific advance, dissemination of the activities, popularization of the results and the socio-economic of the implementation of the innovations.
La revolución actual en la evaluación de la investigación se debe a una serie de factores que han estado presentes durante varios años, pero que ahora están convergiendo para ofrecer un nuevo escenario en el que las iniciativas de Acceso Abierto, los repositorios institucionales, los portales de revistas y la presencia individual de los investigadores en el Web, van a jugar un papel muy importante. La webometría hace mucho tiempo ha anticipado muchas de las novedades teóricas y prácticas y sus herramientas siguen siendo valiosas para describir los nuevos procesos científicos y sociales que afectan no sólo a la academia sino a todos los actores vinculados de una u otra manera con el avance científico, la difusión de las actividades, la divulgación de los resultados y el desarrollo socio-económico de la aplicación de las innovaciones.
Mkt389week9
This document discusses strategies for creating viral content using Berger's STEPPS framework. It examines each element of STEPPS - Social currency, Triggers, Emotion, Public, Practical value, and Storytelling. Examples are provided for how brands have incorporated these elements into successful viral campaigns. Students are then asked to envision a social media content campaign for an unknown product using the STEPPS model and storyboarding a video that incorporates each element. The final class will involve discussing fan media in relation to STEPPS and presenting content strategies and ideas.
Horror Idea
1. Three teenagers play truth or dare and one boy dares the girls to kiss him. He then bites them, revealing he is a vampire.
2. A group of teenagers go camping in the woods near a lake where a girl's body was found drained of blood. Unbeknownst to them, there is a vampire coven living in the woods.
3. At the campsite, the vampire coven kills the teenagers one by one. The geeky girl survives by punching a vampire in the back of the head, as she read vampires are vulnerable there.
Libr230 Week 5 Industry Analysis
The document discusses two analytical models for understanding industries: Porter's Five Forces and PEST analysis. Porter's Five Forces gauges industry attractiveness based on five competitive forces: threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers and buyers, and degree of rivalry. PEST analysis examines the political, economic, social and technological factors affecting an industry. Understanding external industry factors provides context, shows competitive strengths/weaknesses, and helps strategize by ensuring fit with the external environment.
Research digipak
The document proposes design ideas for a digipak for the album "Wasteland" by the band Infernal. The front cover would feature the recycling symbol and a torn image of Simon Cowell's face to represent renewing synthetic star images. The inside covers would show faces of mainstream musicians in a garbage bin, and a garbage lid closing to restrict famous faces. The back cover would reinforce the band's togetherness with a live performance photo of them in a junkyard, showing their mod style.
Bus305 week 3
This document introduces an analytical report project for a BUS 305 course. It will be completed in groups and worth 30% of the final grade. The document outlines the requirements for the report, which must solve a problem by providing information, recommendations, and persuasion. It explains the three step process of planning, writing, and completing a report. Planning involves analyzing the situation, gathering information, and organizing content. The report itself should adapt to the audience and include an executive summary, background, purpose, methods, analysis, recommendations, and conclusion. Students are instructed to form groups and begin exploring an idea for their report.
1 - Evaluating sources' credibility bb
This document discusses how to evaluate the reliability of sources. It explains that sources written by experts are generally more reliable than sources like Wikipedia where authors may lack thorough knowledge. Additionally, it notes that anyone can post information online so readers must think critically. The document provides examples of secondary sources that are often reliable if evaluated carefully, such as books, newspapers, and peer-reviewed research. It outlines criteria for assessing sources' usefulness, credibility, and potential for bias.
Flames summer school 2016 slides
This document provides information on how to effectively search for and evaluate scientific information. It discusses the problems of information overload and information that is unreliable. To address these issues, it emphasizes the importance of information literacy skills to efficiently find relevant information and assess its reliability. It outlines standards for information literacy and provides tips for developing effective search strategies. The document also examines what makes information scientific by looking at internal criteria like its structure, content, date, and author, as well as external criteria such as peer review. It describes various sources for finding scientific information, such as libraries, bibliographic databases, catalogs, journals, and different types of publications. It concludes by offering guidance on formulating search terms and combining them using Boolean operators.
How Do You Evaluate Information Chapter 4Informatio.docx
How Do You Evaluate Information?
Chapter 4
Information Literacy
Chapter TopicsEvaluating the ResourceEvaluating AuthorityEvaluating CurrencyEvaluating the ContentEvaluating Multimedia
The Big Picture
Learning ObjectivesUse a set of criteria to evaluate information and information sources.Identify specific criteria that should be used to evaluate Web pages for credibility and appropriateness.
Topic Scenario QuestionsHow will you even begin to sort through the millions of Websites devoted to nutrition?Realizing the contradictory information on nutrition presented on the Internet, how will you determine which information is credible and which is not?How well do you think you will be able to judge which information you find is accurate and that which is inaccurate?
Topic Scenario QuestionsDo you think you will be able to successfully select the kinds of resources that will be appropriate to support your information? If so, on what criteria will you base your selection? If not, what do you need to know to make an effective choice?How will you find data that you can translate into information that your patients will understand, knowing that most of your patients have limited backgrounds in health-related topics, especially nutrition?
Benefits of
Effective Information AnalysisInformation used will be accurate.
Decisions will be more appropriate.
Your credibility is increased.
Evaluating the Resource
Elements to be evaluated:How information is publishedTimelinesTypes of publications (how information is communicated)
Publication TimelineInfluences of timelineConsiderationsHow important is up-to-the-minute information? (history versus technology example)How important is behind-the scenes information?How can you use both current and progressively
older information?What are the best resources for each of these?
The Publication Timeline
Journals and MagazinesTypes of PublicationsScholarly journalsTrade publicationsPopular magazinesCredibility Factors to Consider AuthorSources of informationArticle review processExamples of each type of publication Primary and secondary sources
Credibility Factors to ConsiderAuthorSources of informationArticle review processExamples of each type of publicationPrimary and secondary sources
Organization of a Scholarly ArticleAbstractKeywordsIntroductionLiterature ReviewMethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferences
Evaluating AuthorityThe AuthorSponsorshipExpertiseAcademic background and credentialsWork-related or other experienceLicensure or certificationAffiliationOther publicationsContact information
The PublisherUniversity pressTrade pressGovernmental agencyNot-for-profit organizationSpecialized pressAn individual
Sponsor or OwnerMeaning of sponsorshipTypes of URLsURL extensionOwner’s reason for presenting the information
Evaluating CurrencyPrint Material Time elapsed from writing to publicationAge of referencesDate and edition of a publicationWebsitesDate of most .
Forec473-Wanda's Presentation
This document discusses evaluating different types of information sources, including academic publications, newspapers/magazines, and websites. It provides guidance on how to evaluate these sources based on factors like author reputation, date of publication, biases, methodology, and conclusions. Academic publications are peer-reviewed sources intended for researchers that should be evaluated based on quality criteria. Newspapers/magazines vary in quality and are aimed at general audiences. Websites require careful evaluation of credibility and information quality. Databases and library resources can provide reliable sources for research.
Institutional Identifiers in Practice: Christine Orr at CESSE 2015
Christine Orr, North American Sales Director for Ringgold, spoke at the CESSE 2015 annual meeting session 'Adding Value to Your Process: Supporting Researchers and Data Requirements'.
Information literacy for advanced academic writing
This document provides an overview of information literacy skills for an advanced academic writing class at ADA University Library. It discusses establishing research needs, selecting and evaluating relevant information sources critically. Primary sources are original materials while secondary sources interpret or review primary sources. Keywords are important for effective searching and can be altered using synonyms. Databases, scholarly journals, and peer-reviewed articles are good sources for academic research. Criteria for evaluating sources include currency, relevance, reliability, authority, audience, and purpose. The document also introduces RefWorks for citation management and notes library resources available through the ADA University Library website.
More Related Content
What's hot
ACRL Framework & The Common Core
This document provides a crosswalk between the six frames of the ACRL Framework and the Common Core Anchor Standards. For each frame, it lists the relevant Anchor Standards and provides a brief definition of the frame. The frames address concepts like authority of information, the process of information creation, the value of information, research as an iterative inquiry, scholarship as an ongoing conversation, and searching as a nonlinear exploration.
Citing sources psychology
The document discusses citing sources and using APA citation style. It notes that citing sources allows readers to evaluate the credibility of evidence, know where information came from, and give proper credit. It provides basics of citing websites and studies/articles in APA style, including author, date, title, and source. A link is included to access a guide on citing different types of information using APA style.
Eval websites
The document introduces the CRAAP test, which is a list of questions to help evaluate information found during searches. The CRAAP test criteria includes currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. Different criteria may be more important depending on the situation or need. The document then lists questions for each criteria to help determine the quality and reliability of information.
Evaluating websites
This document provides criteria for evaluating the credibility and reliability of websites for research purposes. It discusses evaluating the author's credentials, whether the content cites references, the purpose and potential biases of the site, how current the information is, and the website domain. Wikipedia can be used to gain initial understanding of a topic and find keywords and references, but should not be cited directly - the original sources from Wikipedia's references should be evaluated and used instead.
what_is_my_h_index.pptx
This document provides instructions for finding citation counts and h-index based on Google Scholar using the Publish or Perish software. It instructs the user to download Publish or Perish from a provided link, search by author name in the software, and mark papers to view results including papers, citations, citations per paper, h-index and more.
Evaluating Sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources for reliability and accuracy when conducting research. It discusses the differences between primary and secondary sources and emphasizes the importance of considering the copyright/publication date, author credentials, intended audience and purpose, factual accuracy by checking cited sources and comparing to other research, potential bias through persuasive language, selective facts, or flawed research. The document also defines plagiarism and provides methods for properly citing sources such as using quotes, parenthetical citations, and a works cited page.
Evaluating information!
The document discusses the CRAAP test, a method for evaluating information found during research. The CRAAP test involves asking questions about the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose of a source. It helps determine whether a source is reliable and worthwhile to use. Some criteria may be more important than others depending on how the information will be used. Questions address the timeliness, importance, author credentials, reliability, and intended purpose of the information. The CRAAP test is a tool for critically evaluating sources before determining if they should be included in research.
Evaluating information handout
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources using the CRAAP test. The CRAAP test consists of five factors to consider when determining if a source is reliable and credible enough to use for a research paper: Currency (how up-to-date is the information), Relevancy (how well does the information fit the research topic), Authority (the qualifications and bias of the author/publisher), Accuracy (is the information supported and peer-reviewed), and Purpose (is the information objective or does it have bias). Students should apply these criteria to choose sources that are most appropriate and helpful for accomplishing their research goals.
I-Metrics: biblio-, web-, alt- & usage- metrics
A atual revolução na avaliação de pesquisa é devido a uma série de fatores que estão presentes há vários anos, mas que agora estão convergindo para oferecer um novo cenário onde a presença na web das iniciativas em Acesso Aberto, dos repositórios institucionais, dos portais de periódicos e dos pesquisadores individuais desempenha um papel muito importante. O ranking de Universidades Webometrics há muito tempo antecipou muitas das novidades teóricas e práticas e suas ferramentas ainda são valiosas para descrever os novos processos científicos e sociais que estão afetando não só a academia, mas a todos os atores ligados de alguma forma para o avanço científico, a disseminação das atividades, a divulgação dos resultados e implementação socioeconômica das inovações.
The current revolution in research assessment is due to a series of factors that have been present for several years but that now are converging for offering a new scenario where the Open Access initiatives, the institutional repositories, the portals of journals and the researchers individual web presence are to play a very important role. Webometrics long ago anticipated many of the theoretical and practical novelties and its tools are still valuable for describing the new scientific and social processes that are affecting not only to the academia but to all the actors linked in one or other way to the scientific advance, dissemination of the activities, popularization of the results and the socio-economic of the implementation of the innovations.
La revolución actual en la evaluación de la investigación se debe a una serie de factores que han estado presentes durante varios años, pero que ahora están convergiendo para ofrecer un nuevo escenario en el que las iniciativas de Acceso Abierto, los repositorios institucionales, los portales de revistas y la presencia individual de los investigadores en el Web, van a jugar un papel muy importante. La webometría hace mucho tiempo ha anticipado muchas de las novedades teóricas y prácticas y sus herramientas siguen siendo valiosas para describir los nuevos procesos científicos y sociales que afectan no sólo a la academia sino a todos los actores vinculados de una u otra manera con el avance científico, la difusión de las actividades, la divulgación de los resultados y el desarrollo socio-económico de la aplicación de las innovaciones.
What's hot (9)
Viewers also liked
Mkt389week9
This document discusses strategies for creating viral content using Berger's STEPPS framework. It examines each element of STEPPS - Social currency, Triggers, Emotion, Public, Practical value, and Storytelling. Examples are provided for how brands have incorporated these elements into successful viral campaigns. Students are then asked to envision a social media content campaign for an unknown product using the STEPPS model and storyboarding a video that incorporates each element. The final class will involve discussing fan media in relation to STEPPS and presenting content strategies and ideas.
Horror Idea
1. Three teenagers play truth or dare and one boy dares the girls to kiss him. He then bites them, revealing he is a vampire.
2. A group of teenagers go camping in the woods near a lake where a girl's body was found drained of blood. Unbeknownst to them, there is a vampire coven living in the woods.
3. At the campsite, the vampire coven kills the teenagers one by one. The geeky girl survives by punching a vampire in the back of the head, as she read vampires are vulnerable there.
Libr230 Week 5 Industry Analysis
The document discusses two analytical models for understanding industries: Porter's Five Forces and PEST analysis. Porter's Five Forces gauges industry attractiveness based on five competitive forces: threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers and buyers, and degree of rivalry. PEST analysis examines the political, economic, social and technological factors affecting an industry. Understanding external industry factors provides context, shows competitive strengths/weaknesses, and helps strategize by ensuring fit with the external environment.
Research digipak
The document proposes design ideas for a digipak for the album "Wasteland" by the band Infernal. The front cover would feature the recycling symbol and a torn image of Simon Cowell's face to represent renewing synthetic star images. The inside covers would show faces of mainstream musicians in a garbage bin, and a garbage lid closing to restrict famous faces. The back cover would reinforce the band's togetherness with a live performance photo of them in a junkyard, showing their mod style.
Bus305 week 3
This document introduces an analytical report project for a BUS 305 course. It will be completed in groups and worth 30% of the final grade. The document outlines the requirements for the report, which must solve a problem by providing information, recommendations, and persuasion. It explains the three step process of planning, writing, and completing a report. Planning involves analyzing the situation, gathering information, and organizing content. The report itself should adapt to the audience and include an executive summary, background, purpose, methods, analysis, recommendations, and conclusion. Students are instructed to form groups and begin exploring an idea for their report.
Viewers also liked (7)
Similar to LIBR 250 Week 7
1 - Evaluating sources' credibility bb
This document discusses how to evaluate the reliability of sources. It explains that sources written by experts are generally more reliable than sources like Wikipedia where authors may lack thorough knowledge. Additionally, it notes that anyone can post information online so readers must think critically. The document provides examples of secondary sources that are often reliable if evaluated carefully, such as books, newspapers, and peer-reviewed research. It outlines criteria for assessing sources' usefulness, credibility, and potential for bias.
Flames summer school 2016 slides
This document provides information on how to effectively search for and evaluate scientific information. It discusses the problems of information overload and information that is unreliable. To address these issues, it emphasizes the importance of information literacy skills to efficiently find relevant information and assess its reliability. It outlines standards for information literacy and provides tips for developing effective search strategies. The document also examines what makes information scientific by looking at internal criteria like its structure, content, date, and author, as well as external criteria such as peer review. It describes various sources for finding scientific information, such as libraries, bibliographic databases, catalogs, journals, and different types of publications. It concludes by offering guidance on formulating search terms and combining them using Boolean operators.
How Do You Evaluate Information Chapter 4Informatio.docx
How Do You Evaluate Information?
Chapter 4
Information Literacy
Chapter TopicsEvaluating the ResourceEvaluating AuthorityEvaluating CurrencyEvaluating the ContentEvaluating Multimedia
The Big Picture
Learning ObjectivesUse a set of criteria to evaluate information and information sources.Identify specific criteria that should be used to evaluate Web pages for credibility and appropriateness.
Topic Scenario QuestionsHow will you even begin to sort through the millions of Websites devoted to nutrition?Realizing the contradictory information on nutrition presented on the Internet, how will you determine which information is credible and which is not?How well do you think you will be able to judge which information you find is accurate and that which is inaccurate?
Topic Scenario QuestionsDo you think you will be able to successfully select the kinds of resources that will be appropriate to support your information? If so, on what criteria will you base your selection? If not, what do you need to know to make an effective choice?How will you find data that you can translate into information that your patients will understand, knowing that most of your patients have limited backgrounds in health-related topics, especially nutrition?
Benefits of
Effective Information AnalysisInformation used will be accurate.
Decisions will be more appropriate.
Your credibility is increased.
Evaluating the Resource
Elements to be evaluated:How information is publishedTimelinesTypes of publications (how information is communicated)
Publication TimelineInfluences of timelineConsiderationsHow important is up-to-the-minute information? (history versus technology example)How important is behind-the scenes information?How can you use both current and progressively
older information?What are the best resources for each of these?
The Publication Timeline
Journals and MagazinesTypes of PublicationsScholarly journalsTrade publicationsPopular magazinesCredibility Factors to Consider AuthorSources of informationArticle review processExamples of each type of publication Primary and secondary sources
Credibility Factors to ConsiderAuthorSources of informationArticle review processExamples of each type of publicationPrimary and secondary sources
Organization of a Scholarly ArticleAbstractKeywordsIntroductionLiterature ReviewMethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferences
Evaluating AuthorityThe AuthorSponsorshipExpertiseAcademic background and credentialsWork-related or other experienceLicensure or certificationAffiliationOther publicationsContact information
The PublisherUniversity pressTrade pressGovernmental agencyNot-for-profit organizationSpecialized pressAn individual
Sponsor or OwnerMeaning of sponsorshipTypes of URLsURL extensionOwner’s reason for presenting the information
Evaluating CurrencyPrint Material Time elapsed from writing to publicationAge of referencesDate and edition of a publicationWebsitesDate of most .
Forec473-Wanda's Presentation
This document discusses evaluating different types of information sources, including academic publications, newspapers/magazines, and websites. It provides guidance on how to evaluate these sources based on factors like author reputation, date of publication, biases, methodology, and conclusions. Academic publications are peer-reviewed sources intended for researchers that should be evaluated based on quality criteria. Newspapers/magazines vary in quality and are aimed at general audiences. Websites require careful evaluation of credibility and information quality. Databases and library resources can provide reliable sources for research.
Institutional Identifiers in Practice: Christine Orr at CESSE 2015
Christine Orr, North American Sales Director for Ringgold, spoke at the CESSE 2015 annual meeting session 'Adding Value to Your Process: Supporting Researchers and Data Requirements'.
Information literacy for advanced academic writing
This document provides an overview of information literacy skills for an advanced academic writing class at ADA University Library. It discusses establishing research needs, selecting and evaluating relevant information sources critically. Primary sources are original materials while secondary sources interpret or review primary sources. Keywords are important for effective searching and can be altered using synonyms. Databases, scholarly journals, and peer-reviewed articles are good sources for academic research. Criteria for evaluating sources include currency, relevance, reliability, authority, audience, and purpose. The document also introduces RefWorks for citation management and notes library resources available through the ADA University Library website.
VET1604 Essential Library Skills 2021
The document provides an overview of essential library skills for students at Middlesex University. It covers different types of information resources, how to perform searches using keywords, and how to evaluate and reference sources. It discusses primary, secondary and tertiary sources and emphasizes currency, authority, relevance and purpose when evaluating information. The document demonstrates how to search the library database and save references. It introduces the referencing guide Cite Them Right and provides resources on the veterinary nursing subject guide.
Evaluating sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources based on various criteria such as authority, accuracy, content, relevance, objectivity, audience, writing style, and currency. It involves asking questions about the author and publisher's credentials, whether the information and references seem correct, if the content is on topic and answers key questions, the intended audience, logical organization, and date of publication. The overall message is to thoroughly evaluate all sources used for research by focusing on their authority, accuracy, and recency.
Presentation of thomson reuters and web of science in publishing
1) The document discusses various tools for scientific research including Web of Science, EndNote, Journal Citation Reports, and ResearcherID. It focuses on how to search literature efficiently and discover relevant information.
2) Dynamics of scholarly information are reviewed, with Web of Science presented as an integrated solution for literature search, analysis, writing and publishing papers. It allows searching cited references, times cited and related records.
3) Personal tools like EndNote Web and ResearcherID are presented as ways to manage references and build a profile to showcase publications and collaboration opportunities. Metrics like impact factors, citation counts and H-indexes are discussed to evaluate journals and researchers.
Week 1: Using evidence in writing
Presentation for Week 1 of the Developing Skills for Work Based Learning pre-entry course: Using evidence in writing
EPQ workshop for Bishop Douglass School Dec 2017 1234
This document provides guidance on conducting research for an Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) by outlining workshops that cover topics such as identifying relevant resources, searching for and recording information, developing critical search skills, and properly referencing sources. The workshops describe various resource types, search techniques, best practices for keeping records, and accessing research databases and guides available through the university library. The overall aim is to help students improve their research abilities, selection of high quality sources, and demonstration of detailed, well-supported analysis for their EPQ projects.
SOC 111 (Fall 2012)
The document discusses information literacy and defines it as the set of skills needed to find, retrieve, analyze, and use information. It emphasizes that information literacy is a survival skill in the digital age, as it teaches people how to learn by understanding how knowledge is organized and how to effectively find and use information. The document also outlines the main steps to conducting successful research, including defining topics, evaluating sources critically, and properly citing sources.
Holbrook establishing arguments
This document discusses the types of evidence that should be used to support arguments in a research paper. There are two main types of evidence: firsthand research such as interviews, experiments, surveys, or personal experiences; and secondhand research compiled from sources like books, periodicals, and websites. When choosing sources, it is important to evaluate the credibility of the source by considering the author's credentials, how recent the information is, the author's purpose and potential biases, what types of sources the intended audience values, and carefully evaluating internet sources. Credible sources are factual, accurate, and trustworthy.
Choosing Online Sources
The document outlines the CARS method for evaluating online sources, which stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. It discusses evaluating sources based on these four criteria, with credibility focusing on the author and organization, accuracy on whether the information is up-to-date and factual, reasonableness on whether the information is objective or biased, and support on how reliable the sources cited within the resource are. Examples are provided for applying each aspect of CARS to analyze online information sources.
VET 1604 Essential Library Skills 2022
This document provides an overview of essential library skills for students, including different types of information resources, using keywords for effective searching, and how to evaluate sources. It discusses primary, secondary and tertiary sources and covers searching the library catalog and database. Referencing styles and tools like Cite Them Right are introduced. Specific resources for veterinary nursing students are highlighted, including journals, databases like VetMed and PubMed, and subject guides.
DSWBL Week 1: Using evidence in writing
Presentation for Week 1 of the Developing Skills for Work Based Learning pre-entry course: Using evidence in writing
Chapter 3_ Information Literacy.pdf
This document provides an overview of key concepts related to information literacy. It defines information and discusses its purpose and types. It distinguishes between factual and analytical information, subjective and objective information, current and historical information, and scholarly and popular information. It also defines primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The document discusses information fluency, assessing information quality, organizing information, and the ethical use and handling of information.
Lecture_One
This document provides an overview of the topics that will be covered in an Informed Internet Literacy course. The course aims to teach students how to identify, locate, evaluate, and properly use information from the internet to help with research issues and assignments. Students will learn how to determine their information needs, access information efficiently and effectively from sources like libraries, online databases and the internet, evaluate information critically, incorporate information into their own knowledge, and use information ethically. Specific skills that will be developed include online investigations, gathering and synthesizing data, communicating discoveries, and conducting quality research. The document outlines assignments like discussion forums, projects, and a research paper. It also previews discussion topics like blogs, identifying information needs, evaluating
Evaluating Sources Using CARS
The document introduces the CARS evaluation toolkit which provides a worksheet and criteria to evaluate information sources for research. It outlines four criteria - credibility, accuracy, relevance, and support - to determine if a source is reliable and appropriate. For each criteria, it lists specific questions to consider for general sources as well as journal articles and websites. It also provides tips for finding more information about authors and websites to further assess source credibility.
Similar to LIBR 250 Week 7 (20)
How Do You Evaluate Information Chapter 4Informatio.docx
How Do You Evaluate Information Chapter 4Informatio.docx
Institutional Identifiers in Practice: Christine Orr at CESSE 2015
Institutional Identifiers in Practice: Christine Orr at CESSE 2015
Information literacy for advanced academic writing
Information literacy for advanced academic writing
Presentation of thomson reuters and web of science in publishing
Presentation of thomson reuters and web of science in publishing
EPQ workshop for Bishop Douglass School Dec 2017 1234
EPQ workshop for Bishop Douglass School Dec 2017 1234
Factors-on-Authenticity-and-Validity-of-Evidences-and-Information.pptx
Factors-on-Authenticity-and-Validity-of-Evidences-and-Information.pptx
More from Michael Germano
Student Survey
The survey data from 6 years of university library surveys found that the library is heavily used as a place and content provider, but that the value of these roles is diverging. While some services are strained, user discomfort is on the rise. Digging deeper showed interesting variations between colleges in how the library is used that could help assess current services and develop new ones. The survey was limited in scope but provides a starting point to discuss next steps and priorities.
MKT 420 Search Engine Optimization Week 8
This document outlines the guidelines for the final project in the MKT 420 course, which consists of an organizational SEO strategic plan report and presentation. Students will work in teams of two to create a 10-page report covering 10 sections, including objectives, SWOT analysis, competitor analysis, and specific tactic recommendations. They will also present the key tactics from the report in a 10-minute, 9-slide presentation. The report is worth 22 points and the presentation is worth 8 points (pass/fail). The project aims to provide a strategic roadmap for a business's search efforts by analyzing internal strengths/weaknesses and external opportunities/threats to identify the most appropriate search optimization tactics.
Mkt 420 Week 6
Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Week 6 on Link Marketing, Content Marketing and Strategies for Developing Search Presence through Content
MKT 420 Search Engine Optimization Week 4
MKT 420 SEO Week 4 Steps for performing an SEO Audit including SERP page analysis, content analysis, review of code, measuring trustworthiness, evaluating potential keywords and content organization.
Mkt 420 Week 2
This document provides an agenda for an SEO planning discussion. It will cover SEO planning, strategy, and implementation. Specifically, it will discuss how SEO can provide visibility and website traffic. It will also address understanding customer intent, developing an SEO strategy based on business goals and target personas, competitive analysis, and setting objectives for metrics like traffic, sales, and lead generation.
High Impact Strategies for Enhancing Student Engagement Online and Hybrid Ma...
Strategies for impacting student success and satisfaction in online and hybrid classes via increasing social presence in digital learning environments.
MKT 420 Week 1
MKT 420 Search Engine Optimization
Michael Germano
Department of Marketing
College of Business and Economics
California State University, Los Anglees
Active collaborative learning
Active collaborative learning for the social media marketing classroom; social media marketing certificate at csula
Silentclass
This document provides instructions and reminders for an upcoming class. It mentions that there will be a quiz next week on chapters 7-20 from the Pulizzi text. The quiz must be taken with a team and is not open book. An editorial calendar with the team's content plan for the next 6 weeks is due next week. It also reminds students of upcoming individual assignments like a social media press release and blog posts that are due in the coming weeks. Students are asked to submit any missing fan page URLs, content purposes statements, or blog URLs by tomorrow.
Mktedge creativity
This document discusses teaching and measuring creativity in social media marketing classrooms. It outlines preliminary research finding that marketing students see themselves as creative but creativity is not necessarily rewarded in academic settings. It also describes a social media marketing certificate program offered by California State University, Los Angeles. The document proposes models and exercises to help students develop and demonstrate their creative skills in social media strategy, content creation, and other areas.
Digitalmarketingsla2014
This document discusses how big data and analytics are used in marketing to create value for customers. It explains that technological changes have led to the massive creation of digital data from various sources. Marketing analytics uses this customer data to better understand customers and predict their needs and wants in order to determine value. The document advocates that information professionals can play an important role as thought leaders in organizations that use data analytics to inform marketing strategies and processes. It suggests some steps for redefining one's role within an organization to contribute more to analytics and value creation efforts.
Plss780 week 10
This document discusses several issues relating to international internet law, including governance and jurisdiction, international trademarks and copyright, global contracts and securities, privacy, and cybercrime. It notes that jurisdiction is complex across borders and examines preference for national enforcement. The EU is presented as a model for internet jurisdiction based on defendant's domicile. However, self-regulation is likely to be the norm globally due to the role of technology. International treaties and organizations address issues such as trademarks, copyright, and the flow of capital. However, differing privacy standards and cybercrimes present ongoing challenges for global internet governance.
Pls 780 week 9
This document discusses various types of cybercrime and challenges related to law enforcement. It covers topics like fraud, identity theft, privacy invasions, cyberbullying, commercial crimes, spam, challenges in investigating cybercrimes due to their complex nature and lack of jurisdictional boundaries, and several court case precedents related to cybercrime.
PLS 780 Week 8
This document provides an overview of intellectual property topics including patents, trade secrets, and a case discussion. It summarizes that patents provide exclusivity for new and non-obvious inventions for 20 years, trade secrets protect valuable business information that companies have taken steps to keep secret, and both have advantages and limitations for protecting ideas and information compared to other IP rights.
Pls 780 week 8
This document provides an overview of intellectual property topics including patents, trade secrets, and related cases. It discusses what patents are, how they are obtained and enforced, and key requirements like novelty and non-obviousness. Business method patents and landmark cases are addressed. Trade secrets are defined as virtually any valuable business information that owners take reasonable steps to protect. Both patents and trade secrets are important forms of intellectual property protection.
Bus 305 week 8
This document outlines the agenda for a BUS 305 week 8 class which focuses on revising and editing text. It discusses that revising and editing is a multi-step process that involves revising the design, organization, content, and sentences of a document. Specifically, it provides acronyms to help guide revising the organization (OABC), content (the four C's), paragraphs (CLOUDS), and sentences (SPELL). It also mentions that students can earn extra credit points by revising a sample memo in teams of 4 or less.
Pls 780 week 7
This document provides an agenda and overview of key topics in trademark and copyright law, and how digital publishing and online connectivity have impacted these areas of intellectual property law. It discusses topics such as trademarks, copyright, infringement, fair use, secondary liability, domain names, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and notable cases related to trademarks and copyrights online. The document aims to examine the policy considerations behind laws and regulations regarding intellectual property in the digital age.
Social Media for New Grads
Michael Germano's presentation discusses social media best practices for new graduates. It recommends managing your online reputation by googling yourself, optimizing privacy settings, and only posting thoughtful content. It also suggests using social media to build your personal brand, demonstrate soft skills that employers value, and network to help with career hunting. The key message is that social media can be leveraged to promote your professional strengths and value to potential employers if used intelligently.
Pls 780 week_6
This document provides an agenda for a discussion on employment and technology law issues. It outlines several topics that will be covered, including employment agreements like non-competes and invention assignments, employment eligibility verification, employee rights as at-will workers, issues around unpaid interns and foreign workers, and post-employment obligations and agreements like non-disclosure agreements and separation agreements. It also briefly summarizes several relevant court cases on these topics like Intel v. Hamidi on former employee rights and duties and Mattel v. MGA on invention ownership.
Bus 305 week 6
This document provides guidance on communicating bad news messages effectively. It discusses the indirect pattern for bad news, which includes beginning with a buffer, explaining reasons, stating the bad news, offering an alternative, and closing positively. It also covers applying the CBO approach to drafting messages and strategies for different types of bad news messages, such as recommendation, request, adjustment, credit, and order refusals. Specific techniques are outlined for each section of the message and maintaining goodwill while delivering unwanted information.
More from Michael Germano (20)
High Impact Strategies for Enhancing Student Engagement Online and Hybrid Ma...
High Impact Strategies for Enhancing Student Engagement Online and Hybrid Ma...
Recently uploaded
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Event Link:- https://meetups.mulesoft.com/events/details/mulesoft-mysore-presents-mule-event-processing-models/
Agenda
● What is event processing in MuleSoft?
● Types of event processing models in Mule 4
● Distinction between the reactive, parallel, blocking & non-blocking processing
For Upcoming Meetups Join Mysore Meetup Group - https://meetups.mulesoft.com/mysore/YouTube:- youtube.com/@mulesoftmysore
Mysore WhatsApp group:- https://chat.whatsapp.com/EhqtHtCC75vCAX7gaO842N
Speaker:-
Shivani Yasaswi - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shivaniyasaswi/
Organizers:-
Shubham Chaurasia - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shubhamchaurasia1/
Giridhar Meka - https://www.linkedin.com/in/giridharmeka
Priya Shaw - https://www.linkedin.com/in/priya-shaw
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف أحرف الخلاف للقراء العشرةأعد أحرف الخلاف بالتلوين وصلا سمير بسيوني غفر الله له
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/qhtvq32h4ybf9t49ku85x0n3xl4jhr15Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Wound healing PPT
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
Stack Memory Organization of 8086 Microprocessor
The stack memory organization of 8086 microprocessor.
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
Geography as discipline
Recently uploaded (20)
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
REASIGNACION 2024 UGEL CHUPACA 2024 UGEL CHUPACA.pdf
REASIGNACION 2024 UGEL CHUPACA 2024 UGEL CHUPACA.pdf
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
LIBR 250 Week 7
- 2. EVALUATING INFORMATION Learn how to use a set of criteria to evaluate information, information sources and databases Learn how to identify for credibility and appropriateness Engage in critical analysis of information
- 3. FINDING INFORMATION IS THE EASY PART… Evaluating it for credibility and appropriateness is the intellectual heavy lifting Inverse relationship between finding and evaluating What does this mean?
- 4. CRITICAL ANALYSIS Largely common sense! Also depends upon understanding how information is published/created Timeline of information
- 5. TYPES OF RESOURCES Journals/Periodicals (scholarly journals, trade publications, popular magazines) Websites (.com, org, .edu, .gov) Newspapers Books (scholarly or popular) Reference sources (encyclopedias, indexes, directories, handbooks) All of these need to be evaluated for appropriateness, currentness and authority/credibility
- 6. AUTHORITY/CREDIBILITY Who is the author? (credentials, expertise, experienced, licensed, other things they’ve published) Who is the publisher? Who owns the resource (useful for websites!) For websites: What kind of domain? Intended audience Objectivity Verifiable?
- 7. CURRENTNESS & APPROPRIATENESS Date of publication What if there is no date? Who is the intended audience? What is the purpose and scope?