PLS 780
Week 6
Agenda
• Discussion: Technology and the work environment
• Employment and the law in the tech sector
• Employment agreements
• Invention assignments
• Non-disclosures
• Non-competes
• Forfeiture agreements
• Non-solicitation agreements
• Employment separation
• Executive employment agreements
Digital immigrants v. natives
• The tension between these two groups plays out at
work in unexpected ways
• What do I mean?
• Can you think of examples where digital natives
might have expectations that are at odds with those
of immigrants?
Technology and the hunt
for talent
• Legal issues arise from the get-go
• Visitor’s confidentiality and non-disclosure
agreements
• Anti-poaching or collusion (Todd v. Exxon)
• Is anti-poaching inherently non-competitive?
Employment verification
and eligibility
• Tech sector hires up to 10% of it’s employees form
outside the US
• Employment and immigration are two hotly
contested legal areas that abound in procedural
complexities
• What should policy look like?
• Who should bear the burden here? The employee or
the business (Appendix 9 I-9)
Employees and their
rights
• Most employees are at-will; What does this mean?
• Why is the US different from most industrialized
countries on this notion of at-will employment? What
policies are being served?
• Handbooks govern the relationship between
employees and employers
• What tech related issues must find their way into
employee handbooks? How often should they be
updated in order to accommodate technology
changes?
Subcontractors and work
for hire professionals
• Extremely popular in the technology sector
• Non-employees contractually hired to perform
specific kinds of tasks
• Problems arise when employees are treated like
subcontractors or contractors are treated like
employees
• Must comply with employment law and wage and
hour law
• Work for hire as a special subset defined by
copyright law (Circular 9 reprinted in Appendix 10)
State v Kirby
• Facts
• Issue
• Holding
• Rule
• What does State v. Kirby tell us about managing
subcontractors and work for hire employees?
Unpaid interns
• Big part of the tech landscape
• Numerous legal issues here
• Why could the predominance of unpaid interns
undermine fair labor standards/wage and hour law
in the US?
• Is there anything inherently wrong with unpaid labor
in return for experience?
• What does legal compliance look like? (Appendix11)
• What about state laws? Oddly there really aren’t
many if any…
Foreign workers in the US
• H1-B program
• Restrictive employment; no movement (within
company or without)
• Allows businesses to hire employees when they
can’t find qualified employees in the US
• Lottery with no one country receiving more than 7
percent
• Good policy? Why or why not?
Foreign workers outside
the US
• Outsourcing
• Off-shoring
• Supply chain manufacturing partners
• What rights and duties should govern the
relationships with these workers? If any…
The term of employment
• The handbook is a contract
• Fiduciary duties
• Duty of loyalty
• Duty of care
• What special role does technology pay in each of
these duties? Especially when secrets and
processes can be shared so easily via technology?
Post employment
• Former employees also have rights and duties
• Governed by contractual agreements
• Termination doesn’t always end the relationship
Intel v Hamidi
• Facts
• Issue
• Holding
• Rule
Employment Agreements
• Like all contracts, these represent an effort to
formalize relationships based upon a bargained for
exchange
• Policy issues are oftentimes front and center due to
disparate level of power in the bargaining process.
What does this mean?
Invention Assignment
Agreements
• IAA
• Employee invents; Company owns
• Covers work created while an employee
• The employee essentially assigns all rights and
duties that come from the invention to the employer
• Issues can arise based upon the nature and scope
of the work, the assigned rights, the role of the
employee
Mattel v MGA
• Who owns Bratz?
• Facts
• Issue
• Holding
• Rule
Non-disclosures and non-
competes
• NDAs and NCAs
• Varies by jurisdiction in terms of enforcement
• Non-competes are the most litigated. Why?
• To be enforceable must be limited by time, place and
scope
• Must protect a legitimate interest of an employer
• California generally considers them void
Google v. Microsoft
• Facts
• Issue
• Holding
• Rule
Forfeiture agreements
• Very powerful tool for managing tech employees
• You leave, you lose
• The thing you lose: Stock options
• Most jurisdictions have absolutely no problem
enforcing these. Why?
Viad v. Houghton
• Facts
• Issue
• Holding
• Rule
Stock options
• The right to buy shares in the company at a
predetermined ‘strike’ price oftentimes well below
the market value
• Right, not an obligation
• Important tool in an industry that is very dependent
upon human capital rather than physical assets
• Potential for abuse via securities fraud is very real
US v. Reyes
• Facts
• Issue
• Holding
• Rule
Separation agreements
• What should these look like?
• What should the goal be in terms of policy? What
should be enforceable? What shouldn’t be?
• What role should future cooperation in return of for
things like severance play?
• Are these truly bargained for exchanges based
upon consideration?
Executive employment
agreements
• Different form rank and file contributors
• Include bonuses, benefits, responsibilities, events
that trigger terminations, conditions for resignation

Pls 780 week_6

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Agenda • Discussion: Technologyand the work environment • Employment and the law in the tech sector • Employment agreements • Invention assignments • Non-disclosures • Non-competes • Forfeiture agreements • Non-solicitation agreements • Employment separation • Executive employment agreements
  • 3.
    Digital immigrants v.natives • The tension between these two groups plays out at work in unexpected ways • What do I mean? • Can you think of examples where digital natives might have expectations that are at odds with those of immigrants?
  • 4.
    Technology and thehunt for talent • Legal issues arise from the get-go • Visitor’s confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements • Anti-poaching or collusion (Todd v. Exxon) • Is anti-poaching inherently non-competitive?
  • 5.
    Employment verification and eligibility •Tech sector hires up to 10% of it’s employees form outside the US • Employment and immigration are two hotly contested legal areas that abound in procedural complexities • What should policy look like? • Who should bear the burden here? The employee or the business (Appendix 9 I-9)
  • 6.
    Employees and their rights •Most employees are at-will; What does this mean? • Why is the US different from most industrialized countries on this notion of at-will employment? What policies are being served? • Handbooks govern the relationship between employees and employers • What tech related issues must find their way into employee handbooks? How often should they be updated in order to accommodate technology changes?
  • 7.
    Subcontractors and work forhire professionals • Extremely popular in the technology sector • Non-employees contractually hired to perform specific kinds of tasks • Problems arise when employees are treated like subcontractors or contractors are treated like employees • Must comply with employment law and wage and hour law • Work for hire as a special subset defined by copyright law (Circular 9 reprinted in Appendix 10)
  • 8.
    State v Kirby •Facts • Issue • Holding • Rule • What does State v. Kirby tell us about managing subcontractors and work for hire employees?
  • 9.
    Unpaid interns • Bigpart of the tech landscape • Numerous legal issues here • Why could the predominance of unpaid interns undermine fair labor standards/wage and hour law in the US? • Is there anything inherently wrong with unpaid labor in return for experience? • What does legal compliance look like? (Appendix11) • What about state laws? Oddly there really aren’t many if any…
  • 10.
    Foreign workers inthe US • H1-B program • Restrictive employment; no movement (within company or without) • Allows businesses to hire employees when they can’t find qualified employees in the US • Lottery with no one country receiving more than 7 percent • Good policy? Why or why not?
  • 11.
    Foreign workers outside theUS • Outsourcing • Off-shoring • Supply chain manufacturing partners • What rights and duties should govern the relationships with these workers? If any…
  • 12.
    The term ofemployment • The handbook is a contract • Fiduciary duties • Duty of loyalty • Duty of care • What special role does technology pay in each of these duties? Especially when secrets and processes can be shared so easily via technology?
  • 13.
    Post employment • Formeremployees also have rights and duties • Governed by contractual agreements • Termination doesn’t always end the relationship
  • 14.
    Intel v Hamidi •Facts • Issue • Holding • Rule
  • 15.
    Employment Agreements • Likeall contracts, these represent an effort to formalize relationships based upon a bargained for exchange • Policy issues are oftentimes front and center due to disparate level of power in the bargaining process. What does this mean?
  • 16.
    Invention Assignment Agreements • IAA •Employee invents; Company owns • Covers work created while an employee • The employee essentially assigns all rights and duties that come from the invention to the employer • Issues can arise based upon the nature and scope of the work, the assigned rights, the role of the employee
  • 17.
    Mattel v MGA •Who owns Bratz? • Facts • Issue • Holding • Rule
  • 18.
    Non-disclosures and non- competes •NDAs and NCAs • Varies by jurisdiction in terms of enforcement • Non-competes are the most litigated. Why? • To be enforceable must be limited by time, place and scope • Must protect a legitimate interest of an employer • California generally considers them void
  • 19.
    Google v. Microsoft •Facts • Issue • Holding • Rule
  • 20.
    Forfeiture agreements • Verypowerful tool for managing tech employees • You leave, you lose • The thing you lose: Stock options • Most jurisdictions have absolutely no problem enforcing these. Why?
  • 21.
    Viad v. Houghton •Facts • Issue • Holding • Rule
  • 22.
    Stock options • Theright to buy shares in the company at a predetermined ‘strike’ price oftentimes well below the market value • Right, not an obligation • Important tool in an industry that is very dependent upon human capital rather than physical assets • Potential for abuse via securities fraud is very real
  • 23.
    US v. Reyes •Facts • Issue • Holding • Rule
  • 24.
    Separation agreements • Whatshould these look like? • What should the goal be in terms of policy? What should be enforceable? What shouldn’t be? • What role should future cooperation in return of for things like severance play? • Are these truly bargained for exchanges based upon consideration?
  • 25.
    Executive employment agreements • Differentform rank and file contributors • Include bonuses, benefits, responsibilities, events that trigger terminations, conditions for resignation