Workshop: how to prepare a MSCA Individual Fellowship proposal,Aurelio Ruiz Garcia
Our view on Marie Curie Grants and how to be competitive. Workshop on how to prepare a MSCA Individual Fellowship proposal, UPF, 26/06/14 with Regina López.
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) in Horizon 2020SRTD _ II
MSCA Objective
Ensure the optimum development and dynamic use of Europe’s intellectual capital in order to generate new skills, knowledge and innovation
This document outlines the purpose and components of a professional portfolio used to document competencies, expertise, and professional development. It discusses four dimensions of scholarship and provides examples of materials to include in a portfolio such as publications, presentations, teaching evaluations, and evidence of research, grants, and clinical practice. The document recommends that the portfolio be continuously updated and used for self-assessment, professional advancement, and employment purposes.
Research Week 2014: Early Researcher Awards: Opportunity, Eligibility, Applic...Wilfrid Laurier University
The document provides information about the Early Researcher Awards (ERA) Program application process, including eligibility requirements, funding details, evaluation criteria, and deadlines. Promising early career researchers in Ontario can receive up to $100,000 over 5 years to build their research teams. The application deadline for Round 10 is August 11, 2014. The program aims to attract and retain top research talent in the province.
The document outlines an agenda for a session on Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships, including presentations on the fellowships, proposal writing, and exercises on understanding the objective and writing different sections of the proposal. It also provides background information on the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions and Individual Fellowships.
Research fund resources, dr. salwa el sayed, 19,12,1435 mresearchcenterm
This document provides information on seeking funding for research. It defines funding as financial support for conducting research, including supporting investigators and research teams. Obtaining funding is important as it allows researchers to devote more time to complex, well-designed studies, and indicates merit that others have reviewed the study. However, obtaining funding is difficult and requires finding mentors, building a collaborative team with different strengths, and applying through various intramural and extramural sources like government grants and healthcare agencies. The application process involves peer-review to ensure quality. Researchers must report on funded studies and may need to return funds if a study is not completed. Proper budgeting and cost reduction strategies can aid in the application process.
Workshop: how to prepare a MSCA Individual Fellowship proposal,Aurelio Ruiz Garcia
Our view on Marie Curie Grants and how to be competitive. Workshop on how to prepare a MSCA Individual Fellowship proposal, UPF, 26/06/14 with Regina López.
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) in Horizon 2020SRTD _ II
MSCA Objective
Ensure the optimum development and dynamic use of Europe’s intellectual capital in order to generate new skills, knowledge and innovation
This document outlines the purpose and components of a professional portfolio used to document competencies, expertise, and professional development. It discusses four dimensions of scholarship and provides examples of materials to include in a portfolio such as publications, presentations, teaching evaluations, and evidence of research, grants, and clinical practice. The document recommends that the portfolio be continuously updated and used for self-assessment, professional advancement, and employment purposes.
Research Week 2014: Early Researcher Awards: Opportunity, Eligibility, Applic...Wilfrid Laurier University
The document provides information about the Early Researcher Awards (ERA) Program application process, including eligibility requirements, funding details, evaluation criteria, and deadlines. Promising early career researchers in Ontario can receive up to $100,000 over 5 years to build their research teams. The application deadline for Round 10 is August 11, 2014. The program aims to attract and retain top research talent in the province.
The document outlines an agenda for a session on Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships, including presentations on the fellowships, proposal writing, and exercises on understanding the objective and writing different sections of the proposal. It also provides background information on the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions and Individual Fellowships.
Research fund resources, dr. salwa el sayed, 19,12,1435 mresearchcenterm
This document provides information on seeking funding for research. It defines funding as financial support for conducting research, including supporting investigators and research teams. Obtaining funding is important as it allows researchers to devote more time to complex, well-designed studies, and indicates merit that others have reviewed the study. However, obtaining funding is difficult and requires finding mentors, building a collaborative team with different strengths, and applying through various intramural and extramural sources like government grants and healthcare agencies. The application process involves peer-review to ensure quality. Researchers must report on funded studies and may need to return funds if a study is not completed. Proper budgeting and cost reduction strategies can aid in the application process.
UCLA CTSI KL2 Award & Online Grant Library (July 2015)UCLA CTSI
Mitchell D. Wong, MD, PhD
Professor of Medicine at UCLA
Executive Co-Director, Specialty Training and Advanced Research (STAR) Program
Director, UCLA CTSI KL2 Program
Co-Program Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program (CTSI-ED)
WorldStar Consultants provides PhD admission services and guidance through the 12 levels of the PhD research process in India. They are located in New Delhi and help with entrance exams, university admission, topic selection, guide appointment, synopsis preparation, coursework, publications, seminars, thesis preparation, viva exams, and degree completion. Their services include assistance with documents, coordination between candidates and supervisors, data collection, surveys, laboratory work, and formatting guidelines.
This document outlines Chester University's process for accrediting prior learning (APL) through certificated or experiential learning. Students can claim up to two-thirds of a degree through APL. The process involves an initial assessment, tutor guidance to help students identify potential claims, submission of a portfolio including a reflective review of experience and evidence, and summative assessment against the relevant degree criteria. APL helps students convert context-dependent knowledge to academic knowledge, encourages autonomous learning, and enhances future practice. However, it can be demanding for students and difficult to integrate into traditional curriculums.
This document discusses employability support for STEM degrees. It notes that most graduates want greater emphasis on employability, either through optional or embedded support. While support is increasing, linking it to individual disciplines remains important. Options for STEM include identifying existing institutional resources, balancing optional and embedded support, and approaching employability through enhanced learning, employer engagement, and embedding opportunities into curriculums. Differences exist across disciplines, so tailored approaches are needed.
The CTSI KL2 Award and the Online Grant LibraryUCLA CTSI
February 4, 2016 K Workshop
Mitchell D. Wong, MD, PhD
Professor of Medicine
Executive Co-Director, Specialty Training and Advanced Research (STAR) Program
Director, UCLA CTSI KL2 Program
Co- Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program
This document discusses qualifications frameworks and learning outcomes. It explains that qualifications frameworks organize education around learning outcomes, which are statements about what a learner is expected to know or be able to do after a learning experience. Learning outcomes serve as a shared language between higher education institutions, academics, students, employers, and policymakers. Quality assurance processes link learning outcomes to qualifications by accrediting programs based on how well assessment and instruction align with intended outcomes.
The document discusses the peer review process and the Peer Review College used by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) in the UK. It provides details on the decision making structures, key areas like sifting and grading scales, and guidelines for in-house peer review. It describes the Peer Review College, including its membership of over 1350 research active academics, benefits of membership, and selection of reviewers both from the College and externally.
This presentations from EUA Council on Doctoral Education head, Alexander Hasgall, summarises the main findings from the EUA survey on "Doctoral education in Europe today: approaches and institutional structures"
Offering findings gathered from more than 300 institutions across Europe, it provides an overview of the deep transformation that has taken place in doctoral education over the past ten years.
The full report can be found on the EUA website: http://bit.ly/EUACDEsurvey2019
The document discusses doctoral education at the University of Vienna. It provides context on the national, European, and international frameworks that guide doctoral programs. It then summarizes the University of Vienna's implementation of doctoral colleges and Initiativkollegs (interdisciplinary doctoral programs), including peer review of proposals, selection criteria, guidelines, outcomes, and institutional support for doctoral students. It concludes by outlining the university's vision for further developing high quality doctoral schools and establishing common standards for supervision and participation.
REA presentation on Innovative Doctorate Programmedsayago
The document provides an overview of an Innovative Doctoral Programme (IDP) including statistics on submitted proposals. 104 proposals were submitted with the highest numbers coming from life sciences, engineering, and physical sciences fields. On average there were 13 researchers and ESRs per proposal. Successful proposals featured strong industry participation, affiliation with an excellent host institution, and well-defined research and training programs. Six proposals were funded with coordinators from the UK, Netherlands, and Denmark and projects spanning chemistry, physics, life sciences, and engineering. Unsuccessful proposals lacked sufficient private sector integration or multidisciplinary aspects.
This document outlines the development and implementation of the Higher Education Achievement Report (HEAR) at Ulster University. The HEAR provides a record of student achievements and qualifications. It includes information on academic performance, additional awards, activities, and placements. The HEAR was first issued to students graduating in 2011/12 and has been expanded over time to more fully capture student accomplishments both inside and outside the classroom. Principles of assessment and feedback are also discussed to encourage student engagement with the HEAR and facilitate lifelong learning.
Role of researches and publicarions on university rankingsGoran Othman
This document discusses a symposium on the role of scientific research and publications in university rankings. It notes that Kurdistan universities have thousands of researchers but are not highly ranked internationally. Several issues are identified that contribute to this, including weak government research funding, lack of research policies and incentives, and few international collaborations. The document recommends steps to establish reputable open access journals, such as obtaining ISSN and DOI numbers, archiving articles in CLOCKSS, and indexing journals in Google Scholar.
RCUK promotes equality and diversity in research. While progress has been made, some groups remain underrepresented in higher education. RCUK expects funded institutions to promote cultural change and support researchers from all backgrounds. Evidence like Athena SWAN participation is recommended to demonstrate efforts to improve equality and diversity.
Dr Peter Meacock gave a talk in the 2007 Careers After Biological Science seminar series on "Doing a PhD". These are his slides (slightly revised in June 2009).
Plenary presentation at the Lancaster University Researcher Day on 26/09/2013 (http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/hr/development/courses/TeachingResearchRelated/Researcher-Day/index.html)
Opal case study 08 true bristol university and partners ukOPAL2010
The TRUE project involves 14 UK higher education institutions collaborating to create open educational resources for undergraduate economics courses. Academics from each institution are gathering and compiling existing teaching materials such as syllabi, reading lists, lecture slides, and assessments in their specialist areas. These materials are being made openly available on the Economics Network website under Creative Commons licenses to allow reuse and modification. While the project aims to promote open educational practices by transforming existing courses into OER, some materials may have restrictions on repurposing due to a lack of share-alike licensing. Overall, the TRUE project provides OER for specialized undergraduate economics topics through collaboration between academics across multiple UK universities.
This document discusses research integrity issues that may arise for HDR supervisors. It provides an overview of Macquarie University's research integrity policies and guidelines. It also describes some common cases of academic misconduct that have involved HDR candidates, such as plagiarism, contract cheating, and disputes around authorship. The document encourages supervisors to discuss these issues proactively with their candidates to promote responsible research conduct.
HEA Fellowship Info Slides Jan 2016 - Singleton CampusLouise Rees
This document provides information about applying for fellowship with the Higher Education Academy (HEA) through Swansea University's application route. It discusses the different fellowship categories (Associate, Fellow, Senior Fellow), benefits of fellowship, and application requirements and deadlines. The key aspects of written and presentation application routes are summarized, including reflective and administrative elements, word count requirements, and assessment criteria. Support for putting together an application is also outlined.
A presentation for staff of Swansea University explaining the UK PSF, the categories of HEA Fellowship and how to apply for the internal route at Swansea.
Available funding for_research_and_factors_that_make_for_success-dr_faisal_al...Mosab-Khayat
This document discusses available funding for research and factors that lead to success in obtaining grants. It outlines various sources of funding such as annual research programs, government programs, charitable foundations, and scientific organizations. Filling out a research grant proposal is important for obtaining financial support and recognition. Key factors that increase chances of success include carefully researching available funding, contacting funding organizations, clearly communicating research plans in the proposal, and learning from past application experiences. The funding body will consider the research's originality, potential impact, and suitability of the research team when evaluating proposals.
WHO Implementation Research Program on Factors Explaining Success and Failure...RBFHealth
This document discusses implementation research on scaling up Results-Based Financing (RBF) programs from pilot schemes to integrated national health systems. It calls for case studies on RBF initiatives in select low and middle-income countries to identify factors that enable or hinder this transition. Selected proposals will examine RBF scale-up experiences in multiple countries. Next steps include a protocol development workshop to design the research and analyze findings to draw cross-cutting lessons on scaling up RBF.
UCLA CTSI KL2 Award & Online Grant Library (July 2015)UCLA CTSI
Mitchell D. Wong, MD, PhD
Professor of Medicine at UCLA
Executive Co-Director, Specialty Training and Advanced Research (STAR) Program
Director, UCLA CTSI KL2 Program
Co-Program Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program (CTSI-ED)
WorldStar Consultants provides PhD admission services and guidance through the 12 levels of the PhD research process in India. They are located in New Delhi and help with entrance exams, university admission, topic selection, guide appointment, synopsis preparation, coursework, publications, seminars, thesis preparation, viva exams, and degree completion. Their services include assistance with documents, coordination between candidates and supervisors, data collection, surveys, laboratory work, and formatting guidelines.
This document outlines Chester University's process for accrediting prior learning (APL) through certificated or experiential learning. Students can claim up to two-thirds of a degree through APL. The process involves an initial assessment, tutor guidance to help students identify potential claims, submission of a portfolio including a reflective review of experience and evidence, and summative assessment against the relevant degree criteria. APL helps students convert context-dependent knowledge to academic knowledge, encourages autonomous learning, and enhances future practice. However, it can be demanding for students and difficult to integrate into traditional curriculums.
This document discusses employability support for STEM degrees. It notes that most graduates want greater emphasis on employability, either through optional or embedded support. While support is increasing, linking it to individual disciplines remains important. Options for STEM include identifying existing institutional resources, balancing optional and embedded support, and approaching employability through enhanced learning, employer engagement, and embedding opportunities into curriculums. Differences exist across disciplines, so tailored approaches are needed.
The CTSI KL2 Award and the Online Grant LibraryUCLA CTSI
February 4, 2016 K Workshop
Mitchell D. Wong, MD, PhD
Professor of Medicine
Executive Co-Director, Specialty Training and Advanced Research (STAR) Program
Director, UCLA CTSI KL2 Program
Co- Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program
This document discusses qualifications frameworks and learning outcomes. It explains that qualifications frameworks organize education around learning outcomes, which are statements about what a learner is expected to know or be able to do after a learning experience. Learning outcomes serve as a shared language between higher education institutions, academics, students, employers, and policymakers. Quality assurance processes link learning outcomes to qualifications by accrediting programs based on how well assessment and instruction align with intended outcomes.
The document discusses the peer review process and the Peer Review College used by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) in the UK. It provides details on the decision making structures, key areas like sifting and grading scales, and guidelines for in-house peer review. It describes the Peer Review College, including its membership of over 1350 research active academics, benefits of membership, and selection of reviewers both from the College and externally.
This presentations from EUA Council on Doctoral Education head, Alexander Hasgall, summarises the main findings from the EUA survey on "Doctoral education in Europe today: approaches and institutional structures"
Offering findings gathered from more than 300 institutions across Europe, it provides an overview of the deep transformation that has taken place in doctoral education over the past ten years.
The full report can be found on the EUA website: http://bit.ly/EUACDEsurvey2019
The document discusses doctoral education at the University of Vienna. It provides context on the national, European, and international frameworks that guide doctoral programs. It then summarizes the University of Vienna's implementation of doctoral colleges and Initiativkollegs (interdisciplinary doctoral programs), including peer review of proposals, selection criteria, guidelines, outcomes, and institutional support for doctoral students. It concludes by outlining the university's vision for further developing high quality doctoral schools and establishing common standards for supervision and participation.
REA presentation on Innovative Doctorate Programmedsayago
The document provides an overview of an Innovative Doctoral Programme (IDP) including statistics on submitted proposals. 104 proposals were submitted with the highest numbers coming from life sciences, engineering, and physical sciences fields. On average there were 13 researchers and ESRs per proposal. Successful proposals featured strong industry participation, affiliation with an excellent host institution, and well-defined research and training programs. Six proposals were funded with coordinators from the UK, Netherlands, and Denmark and projects spanning chemistry, physics, life sciences, and engineering. Unsuccessful proposals lacked sufficient private sector integration or multidisciplinary aspects.
This document outlines the development and implementation of the Higher Education Achievement Report (HEAR) at Ulster University. The HEAR provides a record of student achievements and qualifications. It includes information on academic performance, additional awards, activities, and placements. The HEAR was first issued to students graduating in 2011/12 and has been expanded over time to more fully capture student accomplishments both inside and outside the classroom. Principles of assessment and feedback are also discussed to encourage student engagement with the HEAR and facilitate lifelong learning.
Role of researches and publicarions on university rankingsGoran Othman
This document discusses a symposium on the role of scientific research and publications in university rankings. It notes that Kurdistan universities have thousands of researchers but are not highly ranked internationally. Several issues are identified that contribute to this, including weak government research funding, lack of research policies and incentives, and few international collaborations. The document recommends steps to establish reputable open access journals, such as obtaining ISSN and DOI numbers, archiving articles in CLOCKSS, and indexing journals in Google Scholar.
RCUK promotes equality and diversity in research. While progress has been made, some groups remain underrepresented in higher education. RCUK expects funded institutions to promote cultural change and support researchers from all backgrounds. Evidence like Athena SWAN participation is recommended to demonstrate efforts to improve equality and diversity.
Dr Peter Meacock gave a talk in the 2007 Careers After Biological Science seminar series on "Doing a PhD". These are his slides (slightly revised in June 2009).
Plenary presentation at the Lancaster University Researcher Day on 26/09/2013 (http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/hr/development/courses/TeachingResearchRelated/Researcher-Day/index.html)
Opal case study 08 true bristol university and partners ukOPAL2010
The TRUE project involves 14 UK higher education institutions collaborating to create open educational resources for undergraduate economics courses. Academics from each institution are gathering and compiling existing teaching materials such as syllabi, reading lists, lecture slides, and assessments in their specialist areas. These materials are being made openly available on the Economics Network website under Creative Commons licenses to allow reuse and modification. While the project aims to promote open educational practices by transforming existing courses into OER, some materials may have restrictions on repurposing due to a lack of share-alike licensing. Overall, the TRUE project provides OER for specialized undergraduate economics topics through collaboration between academics across multiple UK universities.
This document discusses research integrity issues that may arise for HDR supervisors. It provides an overview of Macquarie University's research integrity policies and guidelines. It also describes some common cases of academic misconduct that have involved HDR candidates, such as plagiarism, contract cheating, and disputes around authorship. The document encourages supervisors to discuss these issues proactively with their candidates to promote responsible research conduct.
HEA Fellowship Info Slides Jan 2016 - Singleton CampusLouise Rees
This document provides information about applying for fellowship with the Higher Education Academy (HEA) through Swansea University's application route. It discusses the different fellowship categories (Associate, Fellow, Senior Fellow), benefits of fellowship, and application requirements and deadlines. The key aspects of written and presentation application routes are summarized, including reflective and administrative elements, word count requirements, and assessment criteria. Support for putting together an application is also outlined.
A presentation for staff of Swansea University explaining the UK PSF, the categories of HEA Fellowship and how to apply for the internal route at Swansea.
Available funding for_research_and_factors_that_make_for_success-dr_faisal_al...Mosab-Khayat
This document discusses available funding for research and factors that lead to success in obtaining grants. It outlines various sources of funding such as annual research programs, government programs, charitable foundations, and scientific organizations. Filling out a research grant proposal is important for obtaining financial support and recognition. Key factors that increase chances of success include carefully researching available funding, contacting funding organizations, clearly communicating research plans in the proposal, and learning from past application experiences. The funding body will consider the research's originality, potential impact, and suitability of the research team when evaluating proposals.
WHO Implementation Research Program on Factors Explaining Success and Failure...RBFHealth
This document discusses implementation research on scaling up Results-Based Financing (RBF) programs from pilot schemes to integrated national health systems. It calls for case studies on RBF initiatives in select low and middle-income countries to identify factors that enable or hinder this transition. Selected proposals will examine RBF scale-up experiences in multiple countries. Next steps include a protocol development workshop to design the research and analyze findings to draw cross-cutting lessons on scaling up RBF.
This document provides guidance on navigating New York's public funding process. It outlines the Regional Economic Development Councils that develop strategic plans and provide funding. It also describes the Consolidated Funding Application, which allows applicants to apply for multiple funding sources through a single online application. The document then discusses timelines, tips for applying, the scoring process, and includes case studies of successfully funded projects.
Fundraising Strategy - useful tools that really workThomas Müller
The document provides guidance on developing fundraising strategies. It shares tools and frameworks to help organizations (1) understand their current situation, (2) identify goals and opportunities, and (3) prioritize initiatives. Key aspects covered include using SWOT, PEST, Boston Matrix, and investment analysis to strategize effectively. The overall aim is to inspire participants and equip them with practical strategies.
Essentials for developing a fundraising strategyKim Janssen
The document provides guidance on developing an effective fundraising strategy with 10 essential elements: defining purpose, understanding current position and assets, involving stakeholders, aligning with values, establishing direction, creating a plan with milestones and monitoring, and regularly reviewing. It discusses setting goals to retain existing funding, expand services, and create independent income streams. Tactical tools are presented to analyze the current model and options for diversification through new activities, joint ventures, or trade opportunities. Risks, managing change, and defining success metrics are also covered. The session aims to give attendees a framework to develop their own fundraising plans.
Funding for research and career development through the Strategic Opportuniti...CTSI at UCSF
The SOS Funding Research program provides about $1 million per year to support research grants for UCSF faculty across all schools. It has helped increase overall research funding at UCSF to over $12.3 million total and 421 total awards. Statistics show that from 2001-2005, SOS awarded $5.5 million which subsequently helped recruit over $44 million in additional funding, mostly from government sources. Quotes from grant recipients indicate that SOS funding was critical for obtaining preliminary data and publications needed to achieve subsequent larger grants. SOS has also contributed to advances in standards of care, new policies, and medical technologies.
Dr. Mary Patterson (Akron Children's) describes her experience in Grantsmanship, Funding, and Research planning, particularly with AHRQ and delves in to the structure of the AHRQ Committees that judge and award funding.
Perspectives on Research Funding: the why, what and how of commissioning exce...The Impact Initiative
The document provides an overview of the research commissioning process from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders.
It discusses the key elements of a successful research proposal, including clearly demonstrating how the proposed research addresses the specific call, advances existing knowledge, and is methodologically rigorous. It emphasizes the importance of assembling the right team and planning the project realistically.
The pathways to impact section is identified as an opportunity to show non-academic users have been considered. Key recommendations include identifying actual and potential users, securing support from partners, and outlining pragmatic engagement and communication tools. Coherence and evidence of involvement from named organizations is important.
Network Mapping Training Eli Lilly TB ChallengeGlobalGiving
Manmeet Mehta presents on mapping your organizations network and creating an online fundraising strategy for the Eli Lilly TB Challenge on GlobalGiving.
The document introduces the India Inclusive Innovation Fund, a proposed Rs. 5,000 crore fund that aims to drive inclusive growth and address social challenges at the bottom of the pyramid through innovative entrepreneurship. The fund will be structured as an autonomous entity, with 20% government seed funding and 80% private investment. It will identify and scale innovative solutions through direct investment in bottom-of-the-pyramid enterprises and indirect investment through other focused funds. The fund aims to balance social and financial returns through employment creation and skills development, while operating as a for-profit entity.
Megan Drangstveit, presentation at 2013 ACPA Convention in Las Vegas NV.
Identifying and securing funding within higher education can mean the difference between a program continuing or ending, or a dissertation being completed on time, if at all. Understanding how to find appropriate funding opportunities, compose grant applications, and successfully secure funding for personal or organizational projects is a skill that can be helpful no matter your position. This session aims to assist higher education / student affairs practitioners and students in exploring the world of grants and external funding.
Please contact Megan at mdrangst@msu.edu with any questions.
European Research Funding for Non-European ResearchersAlbert Schram
The document summarizes information from a presentation about applying for European Commission research grants. It discusses the structure of the 7th Framework Program and Horizon 2020, including different funding categories like the Marie Curie Actions program. It provides tips for developing a successful research funding strategy, including checking eligibility, understanding evaluation criteria, and addressing all criteria to maximize scores. Key advice includes getting support to write different proposal sections, using examples from previous successful proposals, and focusing on the objectives and priorities of the specific grant activity.
Demystifying European Funding: From FP7 to Horizon 2020David Young
An overview of EU research funding, including discussion of remaining calls in FP7 (as at July 2013) and an indication of future topics and priorities to be addressed in Horizon 2020.
Gillies D. Funding & Research: "random choice vs peer review"Logic & Knowledge
room x – villa mirafiori – via Carlo Fea 2 – rome
20 May 2015 – 15:30-18:00
Science & Philosophy Colloquia
ROARS – Returns On Academic ReSearch
WEB: HTTP://WEB.UNIROMA1.IT/LOGIC/S&P
The document outlines the key components of developing a fundraising strategy for arts, cultural, and heritage causes. It discusses establishing the case for support by defining the need and why support is important. It also addresses identifying the constituency of support, recruiting voluntary leadership, and determining how to implement the fundraising strategy. The document was created by Julian Thomas of Craigmyle Consultant and provides their contact information.
British academy-northumbria-presentation-oct-2014GillDrinkald
The British Academy provides summaries of its roles, values, strategic priorities, subject areas, and relation to other research councils. It outlines its various research funding opportunities for individuals and international engagement, including Postdoctoral Fellowships, Mid-Career Fellowships, Small Research Grants, and Newton Fund schemes. Evaluation criteria focus on academic merit, originality, and intended outcomes. The Academy engages with the public through various outreach activities and contacts potential applicants regarding funding deadlines and requirements.
The document outlines strategies for nonprofit development and fundraising. It discusses developing deep relationships with donors to inspire long-term giving. Fundraising plans include corporate/individual gifts, special events, annual giving, grants, major gifts, planned giving, and endowments. The development process involves aligning strategies with organizational goals, cultivating donors through trust relationships, soliciting major gifts, and creating an endowment. Metrics for tracking fundraising success include donation amounts, donor retention/growth, and endowment goals.
What is a fundraising strategy?
A plan that
•Sets out organizational funding needs
•Identifies actions, timescales, resources to meet this need.
A Strategy is a long term plan of action designed to achieve a particular funding goal.
Why create one?
•Sustainability
•New sources
•Diverse funding base
•More income
Who Needs to Be Involved in the Planning Process?
•Leadership –planning
–Board(s) and Staff
•Stakeholders –as part of community survey
–Government
–Private
•Donor-Investors –community survey, planning
–Individuals, foundations, corporations
•Constituents –community survey, planning
–Customers, community
Context for fundraising
1.Case for Support
2.Funding Need
3.Scenario Planning
4.Internal Bridges & Barriers
5.Competitors
6.Audiences
Key Stages in Developing a Strategy
•Clarify organisational goals/needs
•Analysis –where are we?
•Generating ideas
•Choosing what to focus on
•Planning and resourcing
•Monitoring
Fundraising Ireland: Building a Fundraising Strategy - first stepsRonanDRyan
This document provides guidance on developing a fundraising strategy. It recommends conducting market, competitor and organizational analyses to understand the context. Key elements to address include crafting a compelling case for support, understanding available resources, and selecting appropriate fundraising channels. The document advocates developing recommendations tailored to the organization's strengths and investing in activities that maximize existing brand value. It stresses the importance of documenting the strategy, securing feedback, presenting to the board, and implementing fundraising plans.
Fundraising Strategy - useful tools that really work IoF 2011Simon Burne
This is intended to provide you with a range of tools to apply directly to developing effective strategies that deliver real results. All the tools have been tried and tested and have been proven to work. Not all of them will be right for you but you're guaranteed to come away with some tools that you'll want to use straight away.
This document provides information for prospective graduate students about pursuing a graduate degree in life sciences. It discusses the skills and career opportunities that come with a graduate degree, including research, teaching, industry careers, and more. It provides tips for applying to graduate school, including identifying suitable supervisors and labs, drafting a strong application, and applying for funding. Overall, it encourages students to pursue graduate education if interested in a career with continual learning where they can contribute to important scientific fields.
Peter Hedden - An opportunity for the plant science research community in Europeepsoeurope
Presentation from Peter Hedden, Rothamsted Research, UK, Deputy Chair, ERC LS9 panel for Starting Grants, at the 7th EPSO Conference, 2 Sept 2013.
"An opportunity for the plant science research community in Europe"
The document provides information on funding various types of research proposals, including guidelines on preparing and writing proposals. It discusses identifying relevant funding agencies, defining the research project, conducting literature reviews, and understanding basic application requirements. The stages of drafting a proposal, including sections on the introduction, problem statement, objectives, methodology, and budget, are outlined. Tips are provided on writing compelling proposals, including being specific, strategic, and ensuring the project matches the funder's priorities. Several major Indian government research funding agencies like CSIR, DAE, AICTE, and DRDO are described along with the types of projects and researchers they support.
Dr Louise Byrne, Research Executive Agency (European Commission) MSCA Present...IrishHumanitiesAlliance
The Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are European Union funded programmes that support researcher training, mobility, and career development. The MSCA offer prestigious career opportunities with competitive salaries, full social security, and chances to work with top researchers across Europe and the world. Funding is available for researchers at all career levels in all domains through individual fellowships, innovative training networks, and other programs. Over 10,600 projects have been funded with over 50,000 researchers from 141 countries participating in the 2007-2013 period.
1. The Higher Education Academy was formed through the merging of several organizations related to higher education, including the Learning and Teaching Support Network.
2. The Academy aims to enhance the student experience in higher education by identifying and sharing best practices in learning and teaching.
3. The Health Sciences and Practice Subject Centre works within the Academy to promote good practices in healthcare education through enhancing quality and sharing resources.
This document discusses the InHERE project which aims to support higher education institutions in Europe in integrating refugee students and researchers. The project will create a catalogue of good practices, hold webinars and workshops for staff training, develop guidelines for university staff, and provide policy recommendations. The European University Association, which represents over 850 members in 47 European countries, is coordinating the project to help mainstream support for refugees through collaboration and peer learning.
Dr Kieran Lee - NIHR Research Training OpportunitiesThe Royal Marsden
The document provides information on various NIHR research training and career development opportunities, including fellowships, integrated academic training programs, and grants. It describes the NIHR's mission to improve health and wealth through research. Key programs highlighted include the NIHR Fellowships Programme, which offers various levels of fellowships, the HEE/NIHR Integrated Clinical Academic Programme, and NIHR grants such as the AMS Starter Grants and Research for Patient Benefit. Contact details and websites are provided for further information.
2017 WRoCAH AHRC Competition applications (optimized)Caryn Douglas
The document provides information about the White Rose College of Arts and Humanities (WRoCAH), a collaborative doctoral training partnership between the Universities of Leeds, Sheffield, and York. It details the funding opportunities for PhD students through WRoCAH, including fees and stipend awards from the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) worth over £19 million. Students accepted into WRoCAH receive membership in a cohort, access to training programs, and additional funding for research support and mobility. The training involves events and colloquiums over the three years to facilitate learning and skills development.
The Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) provides various funding opportunities for arts and humanities research in the UK, including research grants, fellowships, networking grants, and doctoral training programs. The AHRC aims to promote and support world-class research and postgraduate training, strengthen the impact of research, and raise the profile of arts and humanities research. Eligible projects must define research questions and objectives, specify a research context, and identify appropriate research methods. Applicants must fully address the key features required for consideration.
The document provides information about eligibility and the application process for NSERC Discovery Grants. It outlines who is eligible to apply, including faculty requirements. It also describes the review process, which involves external peer review, merit assessment by evaluation groups, and funding recommendations. The document provides tips for completing key parts of the application, such as the CCV, research proposal, budget, and relationship to other support. It aims to help applicants understand the requirements and successfully navigate the application process.
This document provides information on seeking funding for research projects. It defines funding, explains its importance for conducting complex studies and receiving peer review. Obtaining funding requires developing a research team, finding a mentor, and identifying appropriate funding sources like government grants or healthcare agencies. The document outlines the grant application process, including choosing between restricted or unrestricted forms. It also discusses reporting requirements and requesting continued support. Overall, the document offers guidance on acquiring financial backing that is necessary to fully support research efforts.
The document summarizes the requirements for obtaining a PhD from the University of Adelaide. It states that a PhD involves 3-4 years of original research under supervision, resulting in a thesis that makes an original contribution to knowledge in the chosen discipline. Candidates must demonstrate in-depth knowledge of their research topic, relate it to broader frameworks, and show independent and original thought. Thesis formats can include a written narrative, publications, or a creative work with an exegesis.
The document summarizes the requirements for obtaining a PhD from the University of Adelaide. It states that a PhD involves 3-4 years of original research under supervision, which develops the capacity for independent research. Candidates must complete an approved program of study and research, and present a thesis demonstrating significant contributions to their field. The thesis can take various forms, but examiners will evaluate the candidate's knowledge, ability to relate their research to the broader field, independence, and contribution to knowledge.
Guiding to Graduate Schools Workshop| materials.
The workshop (Oct. 18, 2017 @ Kean University, Wenzhou, China) is for helping undergraduate students to choose and apply Graduates schools.
Speakers:
Dr. Jahidur Rahman (PhD, City University of Hong-Kong)
Dr. Candy Lim Chiu (PhD, Kyoto University, Japan)
Dr. Mohammad Mousavi (PhD, University of Edinburgh, UK)
Dr. Jeonghwan (Jerry) Choi (PhD, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Full story is accessible at http://leadershipcenter.tistory.com/445
Similar to Leverhulme Presentation, June 2014 (20)
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance CenterThis Is Reno
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
Monitoring Health for the SDGs - Global Health Statistics 2024 - WHOChristina Parmionova
The 2024 World Health Statistics edition reviews more than 50 health-related indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals and WHO’s Thirteenth General Programme of Work. It also highlights the findings from the Global health estimates 2021, notably the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on life expectancy and healthy life expectancy.
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019Partito democratico
DI SEGUITO SONO PUBBLICATI, AI SENSI DELL'ART. 11 DELLA LEGGE N. 3/2019, GLI IMPORTI RICEVUTI DALL'ENTRATA IN VIGORE DELLA SUDDETTA NORMA (31/01/2019) E FINO AL MESE SOLARE ANTECEDENTE QUELLO DELLA PUBBLICAZIONE SUL PRESENTE SITO
Working with data is a challenge for many organizations. Nonprofits in particular may need to collect and analyze sensitive, incomplete, and/or biased historical data about people. In this talk, Dr. Cori Faklaris of UNC Charlotte provides an overview of current AI capabilities and weaknesses to consider when integrating current AI technologies into the data workflow. The talk is organized around three takeaways: (1) For better or sometimes worse, AI provides you with “infinite interns.” (2) Give people permission & guardrails to learn what works with these “interns” and what doesn’t. (3) Create a roadmap for adding in more AI to assist nonprofit work, along with strategies for bias mitigation.
About Potato, The scientific name of the plant is Solanum tuberosum (L).Christina Parmionova
The potato is a starchy root vegetable native to the Americas that is consumed as a staple food in many parts of the world. Potatoes are tubers of the plant Solanum tuberosum, a perennial in the nightshade family Solanaceae. Wild potato species can be found from the southern United States to southern Chile
Synopsis (short abstract) In December 2023, the UN General Assembly proclaimed 30 May as the International Day of Potato.
Donate to charity during this holiday seasonSERUDS INDIA
For people who have money and are philanthropic, there are infinite opportunities to gift a needy person or child a Merry Christmas. Even if you are living on a shoestring budget, you will be surprised at how much you can do.
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-to-donate-to-charity-during-this-holiday-season/
#charityforchildren, #donateforchildren, #donateclothesforchildren, #donatebooksforchildren, #donatetoysforchildren, #sponsorforchildren, #sponsorclothesforchildren, #sponsorbooksforchildren, #sponsortoysforchildren, #seruds, #kurnool
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Preliminary findings _OECD field visits to ten regions in the TSI EU mining r...OECDregions
Preliminary findings from OECD field visits for the project: Enhancing EU Mining Regional Ecosystems to Support the Green Transition and Secure Mineral Raw Materials Supply.
AHMR is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed online journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects (socio-economic, political, legislative and developmental) of Human Mobility in Africa. Through the publication of original research, policy discussions and evidence research papers AHMR provides a comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis of contemporaneous trends, migration patterns and some of the most important migration-related issues.
2. “…. scholarships for
research and
education….”
Largely funding
research in the UK
higher education
sector: people and their
direct research costs
not overheads or FEC
William Hesketh Lever (1851-1925)
3. The Leverhulme Trust Board
Eight members of Unilever senior management
from diverse, international backgrounds
The Trust is an independent and autonomous
charity
Meets 4 times a year for decisive discussion to
award grants
Has experience of identifying potential and quality
Is resistant to academic fashion
Relies on expert peer review
4. Facts and Figures
Up to £70 millions distributed as grants each year
Across 15 funding schemes
More than 4,000 applications received each year
Approximately 1,500 live awards at any time
Office staff of 14
5. Grants
Research Programmes: up to £1.75M for up to 5
years on themes: e.g. The Nature of Knots and
Innovation for Sustainable Living
Research Project Grants: up to £500K and up to 5
years
For both, at least 75% of the costs to be spent on
research staff (research assistants, doctoral
students) and up to 25% on associated costs
6. Fellowships
Study Abroad Studentships: 1 or 2 years for
postgraduate study/research abroad
Early Career: 3 years for those within 5 years of a
doctorate - matching funding with host institution
Research: up to 2 years for established researchers,
£45,000, replacement costs/research expenses
International Academic Fellowships: up to 1 year for
academic staff, £30,000, replacement costs/research
expenses
Major Research: 2 or 3 years, for distinguished
researchers in humanities/social sciences, funding a
replacement post during the award
Emeritus: up to 2 years for retired academics,
£22,000, research expenses
7. Other awards
International Networks: normally up to £125k and up to
3 years. Explicit justification for why a network is
the best mechanism for addressing the chosen
research theme
Visiting Professorships: 3-12 months for distinguished
overseas academics to enhance the skills of the UK
host institution
Philip Leverhulme Prizes: six subject areas every year,
up to £100k for outstanding early-mid career scholars
Artists in Residence – contrasting disciplines
relaunching April 2014
One triennial major initiative:
Doctoral Scholarships (2014)
Arts Scholarships (2015)
Research Leadership Awards (2016)
8. How to apply…
A two-stage process for Research Project Grants and
International Networks - c. 1000 Outline Applications
received annually → peer review - c. 12 weeks to
process – no closing dates.
If a positive recommendation (c. 50% success rate) this
leads to an invitation to submit a Detailed Application (3
deadlines: September, December, March).
Detailed applications submitted to peer review
(nominated and independent referees) → decisions by
Trust Board (c. 40% success rate). Overall c. 25%
success rate.
All other schemes have a one-stage application
process, normally annually, with decisions delegated to
expert panels and subject to due scrutiny by the Trust
Board.
9. We do not fund…
Medical research of direct relevance to clinicians, health
professionals and/or the pharmaceutical industry
Policy-driven research where the principal objective is to
assemble an evidence base for immediate policy
initiatives
Research of which advocacy forms an explicit
component
Research which is aimed principally at an immediate
commercial application
Applications in which the balance between assembling
a data bank or data base and the related subsequent
research is heavily inclined to the former
10. Particular weight is given to ...
The originality of the proposed work beyond incremental
development and beyond the immediate subject
Research which reflects the personal vision and
enthusiasm of the applicant
The removal of barriers between traditional disciplines
Intellectual curiosity and the willingness to take
appropriate risks
Fresh directions and departures from existing working
practices of the applicant or discipline
The responsive mode, where the choice of topic lies with
the applicant: no preferred areas
11. To sum up…
The Trust wants to support high-quality scholarship/
original research
Many awards support basic, fundamental (“blue
skies”) research and cross-disciplinary (or multi)
projects
A sound methodology is crucial, clearly expressed,
with a clear strategy for the proposed outcomes
Why the Leverhulme Trust? Could/would/should this
work be funded elsewhere? Maybe a bid is not for
the Trust!
We rely on robust peer review by the global
academic community: choose referees wisely!
All disciplines are eligible, but the Trust avoids
assuming the tasks of other specialist agencies, e.g.
medicine and RC priority areas
12. Common errors…
Claims to quality or significance measured by
metrics/”impact”/H-indices/institutional standing
The supposition of a hidden agenda/quota system –
all eligible subjects are considered equally valid
A failure to write in transparent terminology: avoid
jargon and use language for the lay person where
asked to do so!
A overly-detailed review of the literature and a lack
of a clear definition of the research idea or design -
why it is of interest, what and how it will be done
Inadequate planning: hastily prepared, poorly
thought-through, mis-spelt applications
13. Examples of recent grants ...
Shelled heteropods: morphology, taxonomy and
distributions
Connecting the high and low energy views of the Milky
Way
The medieval parish churches of Norwich
Tolerating tigers: do local beliefs offset human-carnivore
conflicts?
Travel and communication in Anglo-Saxon England
Hecke algebras and Kac-Moody groups
Childhood and nation in world cinema
Instabilities in partially ionised prominence plasmas