LEPROSY

               By
          Sriloy Mohanty
             B.N.Y.S
Contents…




 introduction
INTRODUCTION



 Chronic infectious disease
 Surface infection
 Caused by M leprae
 Affects mainly the peripheral nerves
Cardinal features
 Hypo-pigmented patches
 Loss of cutaneous sensations
 Thickened nerves
 Presence of acid-fast bacilli in the skin or nasal smear


Signs of advanced disease are:
 Lumps in the skin of the face and ears
 Plantar ulcers
 Loss of fingers or toes
 Nasal depression
 Foot drop and claw toes
History

 Oldest disease known to mankind
 Leper - Greek word – scaly
 Confused with psoriasis, elephantitis and pellagra
 Known as kushta roga
 1873 – Hansen of Norway discovered M. leprae
 1943 – sulphone drugs used in the treatment
Problem Statement
 1991 – WHO Member State resolved to decrease the level
  of leprosy by over 90%
 Fall in prevalence rate largely is due to
     Improvement in management of cases
     Low rates of relapse
     High cure rate
     Absence of drug resistance
     Short duration treatment
 WHO global strategy for further reducing the leprosy burden
  and sustaining leprosy control activities(2006-10)
 Main elements of the strategy are
    Sustain leprosy control activities in all endemic countries
    Use case detection as the main indicator to monitor
     progress
    Ensure high-quality diagnosis, case management, recording
     and reporting and reporting in all endemic communities
    Strengthen routine and referral services
    Discontinue the campaign approach
    Develop tools and procedures that are home/community
     based, integrated and locally appropriate for the prevention
     of disabilities/impairments and for provision of rehabilitation
     services
    Promote operational research in order to improve
     implementation of a sustainable strategy
    Encourage supportive walking arrangements with partners
     at all levels
India



 Leprosy was widely prevalent in India
 Now out of 611 districts,487 are free from leprosy
 A total of 0.87 lakh cases are recorded on 1st April 2008
 Prevalence rate is 0.74 leprosy cases/10,000 population
Epidemiological determinants
 Agent :
    Caused by M. leprae
    They have affinity for Schwann cells and cells of the
     reticulo-endocrine system
    The bacterial load is the highest in the lepromatous cases
     (2 to 7 billion were estimated in one gram of leproma)
    Phenolic glycolipid (PGL) is the specific M. leprae


 Source of infection
    Multibacillary cases imp source of infection
    All patients with “active leprosy” must be considered
     infectious
    Man is the only source and host
 Portal of exit
     Nose is a major portal of exit
     M. leprae are discharged in the nasal mucosa
     Can also exit through ulcerated or broken skin
 Infectivity
     Highly infectious but of low pathogenicity
     Can be rendered non – infectious by treatment of 3 weeks
     Local application of rifampicin can destroy bacilli within 8
      days
 Attack Rate
     In households 4.4% to 12% is expected to show signs of
      leprosy within 5 years
Host factors
 Age
    Infection can take place at any time depending upon the
     opportunity for exposure
    Incidence rates peak between 10 and 20 years of age and
     then fall
    A high prevalence of infection among children means that
     the disease is active and spreading


 Sex
    Incidence and prevalence higher in males than in females
 Migration
    Mostly a rural problem
    Due to migration it is causing a problem in urban areas also
 Genetic factors
    Human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) linked genes influence
     the type of immune response that develops
Environmental Factors



   Humidity favors survival of M.leprae
   Can remain viable in dried nasal secretion at least 9 days
   In moist soil at room temp. for 46 days
Modes of transmission

 Droplet infection
    Aerosols containing M. leprae




 Contact transmission
    Person to person by close contact (direct or indirect)


 Other routes
    Insect vectors
    Tattooing needles
Incubation period




 3 to 5 years or more
Classification
 Three types of classification
     Ridly and jopling classification
     Madrid classification
     Indian Classification


 Indian classification
     Indeterminate type
     Tuberculoid type
     Borderline type
     Lepromatus type
     Pure neuritic type
 Ridly and jopling classification
     Indeterminate type
     Tuberculoid type
     Borderline type
     Lepromatus type
     Pure neuritic type


 Madrid classification
     Indeterminate type
     Tuberculoid type
     Borderline type
     Lepromatus type
Drugs
 Only bactericidal drugs are used


 Rifampicin
    High bactericidal against M.leprae
    Single dose of 1500mg
    3-4 consecutive daily doses of 600mg
    Side-effects are nausea,abdominal pain,vomiting
 Dapsone
    Used all over the world for 30years
    1-2mg/kg of body weight
    Weakly bactericidal effect
 Clofazimine
    Synthesized for treatment of TB
    Found to have greater value against M.leprae
    May give darkish coloration to the skin,urine,sweat


 Ethionamide and protionamide
    Bactericidal drugs killing 98% of M.leprae in 4-5 days
    More expensive and toxic
    Used as the 3rd durgs in multibacillary leprosy
 Quinolones
    Inhibiting DNA synthesis during bacterial replication
    Ofloxacin is most preferable drug in this group
    22 doses of Ofloxacin kill 99.9% of viable M.laprae
WHO Recommeneded
 For adults
 Multibacillary leprosy
    Rifampicin-600mg once monthly
    Dapsone-100mg daily
    Clofazimine-300mg once monthly
                   50 mg daily
 Paucibacillary leprosy
    Rifampicin-600mg once monthly
    Dapsone-100mg daily for 6 months
 For children 10-14years
 Multibacillary leprosy
    Rifampicin-450mg once monthly
    Dapsone-50mg daily
    Clofazimine-150mg once monthly
                   50 mg daily
 Paucibacillary leprosy
    Rifampicin-400mg once a day
    Dapsone-50mg daily
Estimation of problem



 Disease load on the community has to be estimated by
  surveys
 Prevalence can be determined by examining school –
  age children
Diagnosis
 Clinical examination
    Integration
       Collection of bio data
       Family history
       History of contact with leprosy case
       Previous history of treatment
       Present complaint
    Physical examination
       Inspection of skin
       Palpation of commonly involved peripheral and
        cutaneous nerve
       Presence of thickening of nerves
       Testing for loss of sensation for heat, cold, pain and
        touch in skin patches
 Bacteriological examination
   Skin smears
      Material from the skin obtained from an active
       lesion and also from both ear lobes
   Nasal smears
      Best preparation from early morning mucous
       material
   Nasal scraping
      Nasal mucosal scrapper is used
Biopsy




 When the examination do not yield diagnosis histo-
  pathological examination may be necessary
 It gives an accurate classification of the disease
Immunological tests




 Two types of tests
    Test for detecting cell mediated immunity
    Test for detecting humoral antibodies
Test for CMI



 Lepromin test
 Injecting 0.1ml of lepromin intradermally
 2 types of reaction is seen
    Early reaction
    Late reaction
 Early reaction
    Known as fernandez reaction
    Inflamatory reaction seen in 24-48hrs
    Tends to disappear in 3-4 days
    If the redness is more then 10mm at the end of 48hrs then
     the test is considered to be positive
    Indicates previous sensitisation
 Late reaction
    Reaction becomes apperent in 7-8 days
    Maximum in 3-4weeks
    If there is a nodule more then 5mm in diameter then test is
     positive
LTT & LMIT



 Newer in in vitro tests such as lymphocyte
  transformation test and leucocyte migration inhibition
  test has been developed
 They give a measure of CMI
 Used to detect sub clinical infection
Test for humoral response

 FLA-ABS test (Fluorescent Leprosy Antibody Absorption
  Test)
    Used to identify sub clinical infections
    It is 92% sensitive and 100% specific in detecting M.leprae
 Monoclonal antibodies
    These against M. leprae antigens have been produced
    If antibodies against specific antigens are found, they will
     become reagent of choice for identifying M. leprae
 ELISA test
    Based on a phenolic glycolipid (PGL) antigen
Surveillance


 Paucibacillary leprosy-recomended to be examined
  clinically atleast once a year for minimum 2 years


 Multibaccilary leprosy-leprosy-recommended to be
  examined clinically at least once a year for minimum 5
  years
immunoprophylaxis



 BCG can provide some protection against leprosy
 Several alternative vaccines are under development
 Called as candidate vaccines
 None of them attained “vaccine hood” yet
deformities

 If leprosy not treated at an early stage develops
  deformities
 It is due to damage of peripheral nerve trunks or injury
  from infection to hand and feet's
 Paralysis may occur to some muscle
Health Education


 Anti-leprosy campaign is incomplete without education
 Health education aims at helping people to avoid this
  type of diseases
 It should be direct towards the patient and his/her
  family
 It should educate people on the true facts about leprosy
  and removes superstation and wrong beliefs and the
  social stigma associated with leprosy
Social support




 Chemotherapy alone is not likely to solve this problem
 It needs social support also
 Economic and social problems should be identified
Anti-leprosy activates in India
 1874-Mission To Leprosy was found by Baily at Chamba
  in the Himachal Pradesh
 After that a lot of organizations are established
     Hindu Kusth Nivaran Sangha
     Gandhi Memorial Leprosy Foundation
     National Leprosy organization(1965)
     German Leprosy Relief Association
     Damien Foundation
     Danish save the child foundation


 National Leprosy Control Program(1954) was converted
  in to Eradication Programme(1983)
Thank you…

Leprosy

  • 1.
    LEPROSY By Sriloy Mohanty B.N.Y.S
  • 2.
  • 3.
    INTRODUCTION  Chronic infectiousdisease  Surface infection  Caused by M leprae  Affects mainly the peripheral nerves
  • 4.
    Cardinal features  Hypo-pigmentedpatches  Loss of cutaneous sensations  Thickened nerves  Presence of acid-fast bacilli in the skin or nasal smear Signs of advanced disease are:  Lumps in the skin of the face and ears  Plantar ulcers  Loss of fingers or toes  Nasal depression  Foot drop and claw toes
  • 5.
    History  Oldest diseaseknown to mankind  Leper - Greek word – scaly  Confused with psoriasis, elephantitis and pellagra  Known as kushta roga  1873 – Hansen of Norway discovered M. leprae  1943 – sulphone drugs used in the treatment
  • 6.
    Problem Statement  1991– WHO Member State resolved to decrease the level of leprosy by over 90%  Fall in prevalence rate largely is due to  Improvement in management of cases  Low rates of relapse  High cure rate  Absence of drug resistance  Short duration treatment  WHO global strategy for further reducing the leprosy burden and sustaining leprosy control activities(2006-10)
  • 7.
     Main elementsof the strategy are  Sustain leprosy control activities in all endemic countries  Use case detection as the main indicator to monitor progress  Ensure high-quality diagnosis, case management, recording and reporting and reporting in all endemic communities  Strengthen routine and referral services  Discontinue the campaign approach  Develop tools and procedures that are home/community based, integrated and locally appropriate for the prevention of disabilities/impairments and for provision of rehabilitation services  Promote operational research in order to improve implementation of a sustainable strategy  Encourage supportive walking arrangements with partners at all levels
  • 8.
    India  Leprosy waswidely prevalent in India  Now out of 611 districts,487 are free from leprosy  A total of 0.87 lakh cases are recorded on 1st April 2008  Prevalence rate is 0.74 leprosy cases/10,000 population
  • 9.
    Epidemiological determinants  Agent:  Caused by M. leprae  They have affinity for Schwann cells and cells of the reticulo-endocrine system  The bacterial load is the highest in the lepromatous cases (2 to 7 billion were estimated in one gram of leproma)  Phenolic glycolipid (PGL) is the specific M. leprae  Source of infection  Multibacillary cases imp source of infection  All patients with “active leprosy” must be considered infectious  Man is the only source and host
  • 10.
     Portal ofexit  Nose is a major portal of exit  M. leprae are discharged in the nasal mucosa  Can also exit through ulcerated or broken skin  Infectivity  Highly infectious but of low pathogenicity  Can be rendered non – infectious by treatment of 3 weeks  Local application of rifampicin can destroy bacilli within 8 days  Attack Rate  In households 4.4% to 12% is expected to show signs of leprosy within 5 years
  • 11.
    Host factors  Age  Infection can take place at any time depending upon the opportunity for exposure  Incidence rates peak between 10 and 20 years of age and then fall  A high prevalence of infection among children means that the disease is active and spreading  Sex  Incidence and prevalence higher in males than in females  Migration  Mostly a rural problem  Due to migration it is causing a problem in urban areas also
  • 12.
     Genetic factors  Human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) linked genes influence the type of immune response that develops
  • 13.
    Environmental Factors  Humidity favors survival of M.leprae  Can remain viable in dried nasal secretion at least 9 days  In moist soil at room temp. for 46 days
  • 14.
    Modes of transmission Droplet infection  Aerosols containing M. leprae  Contact transmission  Person to person by close contact (direct or indirect)  Other routes  Insect vectors  Tattooing needles
  • 15.
    Incubation period  3to 5 years or more
  • 16.
    Classification  Three typesof classification  Ridly and jopling classification  Madrid classification  Indian Classification  Indian classification  Indeterminate type  Tuberculoid type  Borderline type  Lepromatus type  Pure neuritic type
  • 17.
     Ridly andjopling classification  Indeterminate type  Tuberculoid type  Borderline type  Lepromatus type  Pure neuritic type  Madrid classification  Indeterminate type  Tuberculoid type  Borderline type  Lepromatus type
  • 18.
    Drugs  Only bactericidaldrugs are used  Rifampicin  High bactericidal against M.leprae  Single dose of 1500mg  3-4 consecutive daily doses of 600mg  Side-effects are nausea,abdominal pain,vomiting  Dapsone  Used all over the world for 30years  1-2mg/kg of body weight  Weakly bactericidal effect
  • 19.
     Clofazimine  Synthesized for treatment of TB  Found to have greater value against M.leprae  May give darkish coloration to the skin,urine,sweat  Ethionamide and protionamide  Bactericidal drugs killing 98% of M.leprae in 4-5 days  More expensive and toxic  Used as the 3rd durgs in multibacillary leprosy
  • 20.
     Quinolones  Inhibiting DNA synthesis during bacterial replication  Ofloxacin is most preferable drug in this group  22 doses of Ofloxacin kill 99.9% of viable M.laprae
  • 21.
    WHO Recommeneded  Foradults  Multibacillary leprosy  Rifampicin-600mg once monthly  Dapsone-100mg daily  Clofazimine-300mg once monthly 50 mg daily  Paucibacillary leprosy  Rifampicin-600mg once monthly  Dapsone-100mg daily for 6 months
  • 22.
     For children10-14years  Multibacillary leprosy  Rifampicin-450mg once monthly  Dapsone-50mg daily  Clofazimine-150mg once monthly 50 mg daily  Paucibacillary leprosy  Rifampicin-400mg once a day  Dapsone-50mg daily
  • 23.
    Estimation of problem Disease load on the community has to be estimated by surveys  Prevalence can be determined by examining school – age children
  • 24.
    Diagnosis  Clinical examination  Integration  Collection of bio data  Family history  History of contact with leprosy case  Previous history of treatment  Present complaint  Physical examination  Inspection of skin  Palpation of commonly involved peripheral and cutaneous nerve  Presence of thickening of nerves  Testing for loss of sensation for heat, cold, pain and touch in skin patches
  • 25.
     Bacteriological examination  Skin smears  Material from the skin obtained from an active lesion and also from both ear lobes  Nasal smears  Best preparation from early morning mucous material  Nasal scraping  Nasal mucosal scrapper is used
  • 26.
    Biopsy  When theexamination do not yield diagnosis histo- pathological examination may be necessary  It gives an accurate classification of the disease
  • 27.
    Immunological tests  Twotypes of tests  Test for detecting cell mediated immunity  Test for detecting humoral antibodies
  • 28.
    Test for CMI Lepromin test  Injecting 0.1ml of lepromin intradermally  2 types of reaction is seen  Early reaction  Late reaction
  • 29.
     Early reaction  Known as fernandez reaction  Inflamatory reaction seen in 24-48hrs  Tends to disappear in 3-4 days  If the redness is more then 10mm at the end of 48hrs then the test is considered to be positive  Indicates previous sensitisation  Late reaction  Reaction becomes apperent in 7-8 days  Maximum in 3-4weeks  If there is a nodule more then 5mm in diameter then test is positive
  • 30.
    LTT & LMIT Newer in in vitro tests such as lymphocyte transformation test and leucocyte migration inhibition test has been developed  They give a measure of CMI  Used to detect sub clinical infection
  • 31.
    Test for humoralresponse  FLA-ABS test (Fluorescent Leprosy Antibody Absorption Test)  Used to identify sub clinical infections  It is 92% sensitive and 100% specific in detecting M.leprae  Monoclonal antibodies  These against M. leprae antigens have been produced  If antibodies against specific antigens are found, they will become reagent of choice for identifying M. leprae  ELISA test  Based on a phenolic glycolipid (PGL) antigen
  • 32.
    Surveillance  Paucibacillary leprosy-recomendedto be examined clinically atleast once a year for minimum 2 years  Multibaccilary leprosy-leprosy-recommended to be examined clinically at least once a year for minimum 5 years
  • 33.
    immunoprophylaxis  BCG canprovide some protection against leprosy  Several alternative vaccines are under development  Called as candidate vaccines  None of them attained “vaccine hood” yet
  • 34.
    deformities  If leprosynot treated at an early stage develops deformities  It is due to damage of peripheral nerve trunks or injury from infection to hand and feet's  Paralysis may occur to some muscle
  • 35.
    Health Education  Anti-leprosycampaign is incomplete without education  Health education aims at helping people to avoid this type of diseases  It should be direct towards the patient and his/her family  It should educate people on the true facts about leprosy and removes superstation and wrong beliefs and the social stigma associated with leprosy
  • 36.
    Social support  Chemotherapyalone is not likely to solve this problem  It needs social support also  Economic and social problems should be identified
  • 37.
    Anti-leprosy activates inIndia  1874-Mission To Leprosy was found by Baily at Chamba in the Himachal Pradesh  After that a lot of organizations are established  Hindu Kusth Nivaran Sangha  Gandhi Memorial Leprosy Foundation  National Leprosy organization(1965)  German Leprosy Relief Association  Damien Foundation  Danish save the child foundation  National Leprosy Control Program(1954) was converted in to Eradication Programme(1983)
  • 38.