SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Back Office Process
“Key” Distribution Process at
WSU Engineering Business Office
Abishek Anand
Shruti Baug
Joel Fortgang
Kara Wandrie
Parag Kapile
Engineering Business Office (EBO)
• Key Distribution Process to give key to open
engineering rooms consists of 2 employees:
1. Kathryn- Primary contact with the system.
2.Eman- Student assistant. She is responsible
for placing keys on and off the rack, maintaining
inventory and filling in spreadsheets.
• 10 keys are requested per week.
• Heavy load during the commencement of
semester.
Purpose of the Project
• Kathryn who is the primary contact with the
system has to spend too much time and too
much effort on the system.
• The purpose of the project is find the root
cause of the problem, find the appropriate
solution for the problem and to make Kathryn
work easy and efficient.
Flow Chart for “Key” Process
Process Overview
New Key Request
• Completed Key Request Form is submitted to
EBO. (10 mins)
• Information from the form is filled in the EBO
system, excel sheet and print out is taken and
maintained in a file.(15 mins)
New Request cont..
• Tag # is obtained by entering the room # from
the system. (2 mins)
• Tag # is located in the key box.(10 mins)
New Key Request cont...
• Corresponding key from the Tag # is selected.
• Key is put in the envelope.
• Key # is filled in the form, and envelope is
stapled to the request form and passed to
front desk. (5 mins)
• Customer is emailed to pick up the key.
• Customer must show ID and sign request at
pick up.
Current State Value Stream Map
Supplier/Customer
Receive Form Review One Card
Information
Custom Software
Enter information
into Software
Print Out Docs
Excel
Enter Key into
Spreadsheet
Find Tag Take Key Return Tag Give Student Key File Paperwork
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
5 Seconds
14400 Seconds
360 Seconds
600 Seconds
180 Seconds
0 Seconds
360 Seconds
0 Seconds
600 Seconds
0 Seconds
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
20 Seconds
0 Seconds
5 Seconds
0 Seconds
120 Seconds
3600 Seconds
5 Sets of Paperwork
Value Added Time = 1710
Seconds
Total Lead Time = 18600
Seconds
C/T 5 Seconds
W/T 14400 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 60 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 5 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 3600 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
Production Control
Intermittent when problems
DailyDeliveryofKeys
DailyDeliveryofApplications
Daily Delivery of Applications Daily Delivery of Keys
Intermittent when problems
Intermittent
Current State Value Stream Map
Supplier/Customer
Production Control
Intermittent when problems
Daily Delivery of Applications Daily Delivery of Keys
Intermittent when problems
Receive Form Review One Card
Information
Custom Software
Enter information
into Software
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
5 Seconds
14400 Seconds
360 Seconds
600 Seconds 0 Seconds
C/T 5 Seconds
W/T 14400 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
IntermittentPrint Out Docs
Excel
Enter Key into
Spreadsheet
Find Tag Take Key
180 Seconds
0 Seconds
360 Seconds
0 Seconds
600 Seconds
0 Seconds
30 Seconds
0 Seconds 0 Sec
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 60 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
Intermittent when problems
Return Tag Give Student Key File Paperwork
20 Seconds
0 Seconds
5 Seconds
0 Seconds
120 Seconds
3600 Seconds
5 Sets of Paperwork
Value Added Time = 1710
Seconds
Total Lead Time = 18600
Seconds
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 5 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 3600 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
Supplier/Customer
Production Control
Intermittent when problems
Daily Delivery of Applications Daily Delivery of Keys
Intermittent when problems
KPI Metrics
• Labor time spent per key
– Total labor hours spent per keys issued in a week
= Total # of minutes spent/
#of keys issued per week
= 15 minutes (from Gemba walk)
• Average Lead time
– Total time taken from the time student drops off
form until receiving the key
– Measured in minutes
– Average lead time is 28.5 minutes
KPI Metrics
• Average number of keys issued
– Number of keys issued per week
= Total # of keys issued / # of weeks
= 131/13
= 10
KPI Metrics
Key Request per week
24
16
11
3
8
10
12
6
15
13
6
1
6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13
Gemba Walk
Key Request/Week
• Takt time
– Available time / Customer demand
= 40 hours / 10 keys per week
= 4 hours per key per week
KPI Metrics
• Kathryn and Eman utilize a lot of time
distributing, ordering keys, and entering data
into system. This consumes a lot of time for
personnel in the engineering office. Current
labor time spent per key is 15 minutes and the
desired labor time is under 6 minutes.
Problem Statement
● 5 Hypotheses
○ The physical access to the keys is challenging.
○ The record keeping takes up a lot of valuable time.
○ Keys are not returned so new keys must continually be
made.
○ Takes too long to procure keys for the students.
○ Wayne States key ordering process takes too much effort.
Plan – 5 Whys
Why are Kathryn and Eman are spending to much of their day
working on distributing keys?
● 5 Hypotheses
○ The physical access to the keys is challenging.
○ The record keeping takes up a lot of valuable time.
○ Keys are not returned so new keys must continually be
made.
○ Takes too long to procure keys for the students.
○ Wayne States key ordering process takes too much effort.
● Evidence
○ Value Stream: Record keeping is where most of the active
time is spent.
● Controllable: No
Plan – 5 Whys
Why are Kathryn and Eman are spending to much of their day
working on distributing keys?
● 4 Hypotheses
○ The Paper work is not uniformed
○ The recording system is convoluted
○ Paper Binders are hard to work with
○ Inaccurate Paper Work
Plan – 5 Whys
Why does the record keeping take so much time?
● 4 Hypotheses
○ The Paper work is not uniformed
○ The recording system is convoluted
○ Paper Binders are hard to work with
○ Inaccurate Paper Work
● Evidence
○ Gemba Walk: Operators complain about software system
● Controllable: No
Plan – 5 Whys
Why does the record keeping take so much time?
● 3 Hypotheses
○ There are multiple systems being used
○ The excel spreadsheet is too complicated
○ The software design is confusing
Plan – 5 Whys
Why is the recording system problematic?
● 3 Hypotheses
○ There are multiple systems being used
○ The excel spreadsheet is too complicated
○ The software design is confusing
● Evidence
○ Flow Chart-The same work is done three times
● Controllable - Yes
Plan – 5 Whys
Why is the recording system problematic?
Plan - 4S for Excess Time Consumption
Order
Skill Suppliers
Systems
Surrounding
s
Key
manufacturer
Key delivery from
the manufacturer
Unreadable
Forms
Untrained
Employee
Manpower
Shortage
Software
Duplication Software
Outdated
Sending Multiple
Reminders/e-mails
Concerned
customer not
available
Disorganized key
cabinet
Excess time
consumption
Surrounding Suppliers
Systems
Delivering key
without form
Customers
Losing key
Customers
returning
key
Reordering new
keys
Unassigned keys
Mismatch Keys
Untagged keys
Excess Cost
Plan- 3S for Excess Cost
Plan- Future State Value Stream Map
Supplier/Customer
Receive Form Review One Card
Information
Check software for
Tag # and if Key is
Available
Custom Software
Enter User info into
Software
Find Tag Take Key Return Tag Give Student Key
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
5 Seconds
14400 Seconds
60 Seconds
600 Seconds
120 Seconds
0 Seconds
600 Seconds
0 Seconds
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
20 Seconds
0 Seconds
5 Seconds
0 Seconds
Value Added Time = 870
Seconds
Total Lead Time = 15000
Seconds
C/T 5 Seconds
W/T 14400 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 60 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 60 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 5 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
Production Control
Weekly
DailyDeliveryofKeys
DailyDeliveryofApplications
Daily Delivery of Applications Daily Delivery of Keys
Intermittent when problems
Intermittent
Weekly
Plan- Future State Value Stream Map
Supplier/Customer
Production Control
Weekly
Daily Delivery of Applications Daily Delivery of Keys
Intermittent when problems
Weekly
Supplier/Customer
Production Control
Daily Delivery of Applications Daily Delivery of Keys
Intermittent when problems
Receive Form Review One Card
Information
Check software for
Tag # and if Key is
Available
Custom Software
Enter User info into
Software
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
5 Seconds
14400 Seconds
60 Seconds
600 Seconds
120 Seconds
0 Seconds 0 Seconds
C/T 5 Seconds
W/T 14400 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 60 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
Weekly
Dail
Intermittent
Weekly
Find Tag Take Key Return Tag Give Student Key
600 Seconds
Seconds
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
20 Seconds
0 Seconds
5 Seconds
0 Seconds
Value Added Time = 870
Seconds
Total Lead Time = 15000
Seconds
C/T 60 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 5 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
Daily
Plan- Improvements in Future State
• Eliminated 2 process steps
• Added 2 levels of status communication
• Lead time
– Current State = 28.5 minutes
– Future State = 14.5 minutes
• Labor time
– Current State = 15 minutes
– Future State = 3 minutes
Plan – Design Decisions To Merge
Recording Processes
• Decision Variable
– Time to Process Key
– Cost in dollars
– Training Requirements
– Support / Stability
– Data Import / Initial Data Entry
– Oversight
Plan – Design Alternatives
• One System
– Paper Only
– Excel Spreadsheet Only
– Existing Custom Software
– New Software
Plan – New Software Alternatives
• Custom - $ Unknown
• Key Wizard- $1200
– http://www.keywizard.net/
• Tracer 9 - $900
– https://www.dlaco.com/tracerxt/
• Key Organizer - $600
– https://www.aidex-software.com/en/key-
organizer/
Plan – Evaluation Matrix
Criteria Weight
Paper
System
Spread
Sheet
Existing
Software
Custom
Software
Key
Wizard Tracer 9
Key
Organizer
Process Time 5 1 2 2 4 4 3 3
Cost in dollars 8 4 4 4 1 3 3 2
Training 1 2 2 1 4 3 3 3
Support / Stability 2 1 1 2 2 3 2 4
Import / Initial 3 2 2 4 4 2 2 2
Oversight 3 1 1 1 4 3 4 3
Totals 50 55 61 68 77 69 70
Do - Method for Small Scale Test
• Obtain Key Wizard Trial Version
• Train Eman (Student Assistant) in Key Wizard
• For One Week
• Enter Data into Both System
• Record Time for Each System
Check - Small Scale Test
• Compare Average Times to Process for Existing
• Evaluation Time Savings per Week
• Compute New KPI
– Average Labor Time Per Key
• Determine ROI on Key Wizard
• Present Findings to Lara (Office Manager)
• Lara Determines if Plan should be
implemented, or go back to plan
Act - Full Implementation
• Determine Week of Low Key Demand from
Historic Data
• Convert Existing Data into Key Wizard
• Train Staff (Kathryn, Lara and Eman)
• Begin Processing Keys
Expected Results
• Key Process Labor Time Reduction from 15
minutes to under 6 minutes
• Greater Long Term Stability of System
• Better Oversight for Office Manager (Lara)
Review/Loop-Do we need to Keep going
• Ongoing
– Review Key Process Numbers Every Semester for
Employee performance
– Contact Key Wizard Manufacturer for Updates
Once a year
• Another PDCA Cycle
– Look at all KPI’s
– Revisit Customer Viewpoint
– Determine if another Cycle is needed
A3- Report
Projected Business Performance Improvement Story [BPIS]
Prior State Problem Statement Process Analysis
Gemab Walk, Flow
Chart, Current VSM Map
KPI Definitions, Key Performance
Metrics 5 Why Analysis, Fishbone Diagram
Design Initiatives Implementation Results
Future Value Stream,
Solution Criteria,
Solution Alternatives,
Evaluation Matrix
Do Explanation, Check
Explanation, Act Explanation,
Review and Loop
Expected Results Explanation,
Process Labort Reduced 23 %
Questions
• This is how we climb the Staircase
● Standardize Form
● Place Forms On-Line
● Review Software Alternatives with Staff for
better evaluation criteria
● Organize Key Boxes
● Replace Key Boxes
Appendix -Further
Recommendations
● Develop Online Request System
● Record phone number of student
● Prevent graduation for non-return keys
● Charge a deposit
Appendix -Further
Recommendations
● http://www.prosystech.ca/overviewsk.aspx
● http://www.keywizard.net/prices.html
● https://www.dlaco.com/tracerxt/tracer1.htm
● http://www.instakey.com/key-control-software/
● http://www.morsewatchmans.com/product/keywatcher/key-
control-software/
● https://www.aidex-software.com/en/key-organizer/
https://www.keytracker.com/Product/Category/Key-Control-
Software
● Software Written By Computer Science Class
Appendix - Software List
● Hypotheses
○ The physical access to the keys is challenging.
■ Evidence - The key cabinet is hard to access and is very un-organized.
○ The record keeping takes up a lot of valuable time.
■ Evidence - Value Stream: Record keeping is where most of the active
time is spent.
○ Keys are not returned so new keys must continually be made.
■ Evidence - They have a set process to follow if a key is requested and
cannot be found because someone else didn’t return it after use.
○ Takes too long to procure keys for the students.
■ Evidence - They make the students come to the office just to fill out
paper work then leave and make them come back when the key is ready.
○ Wayne States key ordering process takes too much effort.
■ Evidence -he students have to come in to fill out forms and then later
have to come back to pick it up.
Appendix – 5 Whys
Why are Kathryn and Eman are spending to much of their day working on distributing
keys?
● Hypotheses
○ The Paper work is not uniformed
■ Evidence - Gemba Walk: Inspection of Paperwork
○ The recording system is convoluted
■ Evidence- Gemba Walk: Operators complain about
software system
○ Paper Binders are hard to work with
■ Evidence- Gemba Walk: Photos of binders
○ Inaccurate Paper Work
■ Evidence - Gemba Walk: Interview with Kathryn
Appendix – 5 Whys
Why does the record keeping take so much time?
● Hypotheses
○ There are multiple systems being used
■ Evidence - Flow Chart: The same work is done three
times
○ The excel spreadsheet is too complicated
■ Evidence - Gemba Walk: Example of the spreadsheet
○ The software design is confusing
■ Evidence - Gemba Walk: Photos of interface
Appendix– 5 Whys
Why is the recording system problematic?
Appendix- Key Order Flowchart
Appendix- Current Value Stream
Map of all Processes
Value Added Time = 30065
Seconds
Total Lead Time = 7200
Seconds
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
60 Seconds
0 Seconds
Supplier
Online Form External Processing Key is Ready Email Key Pick Up
KeyNeeds
tobe
made
Enter Key into
Software
Enter Key into
Spreadsheet
ForStock
Put Key in Envelope
ForHandingOut
Send Pick Up Email Pick up of Key
KeyExists
Receive Key After
Use
Enter Key into
Software
Enter Key into
Spreadsheet
Find Tag Put Tag on Key Return Tag with Key
KeyReturn
Go to Key Request
Loop
KeyDoesn’tExist
Find Tag Put Tag on Key Return Tag with Key
300 Seconds
14400 Seconds
28800 Seconds
0 Seconds
5 Seconds
0 Seconds
600 Seconds
3600 Seconds
120 Seconds
3600 Seconds
120 Seconds
0 Seconds
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
60 Seconds
0 Seconds
120 Seconds
14400 Seconds
Value Added Time = 30155
Seconds
Total Lead Time = 21600
Seconds
30 Seconds
14400 Seconds
120 Seconds
7200 Seconds
120 Seconds
0 Seconds
60 Seconds
0 Seconds
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
Value Added Time = 390
Seconds
Total Lead Time = 21600
Seconds
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 14400 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 7200 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 60 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 60 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 14400 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 60 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 3600 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 600 Seconds
W/T 3600 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 5 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 28800 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 300 Seconds
W/T 14400 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
File Paperwork
120 Seconds
3600 Seconds
120 Seconds
3600 Seconds
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 3600 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
File Paperwork
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 3600 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
File Paperwork
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 3600 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
120 Seconds
3600 Seconds
Customer
PC = Manager
Intermittent
Intermittent
Intermittent
Find Tag Take Key Return Tag Give Student Key File Paperwork
600 Seconds
0 Seconds
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
20 Seconds
0 Seconds
5 Seconds
0 Seconds
120 Seconds
3600 Seconds
5 Sets of Paperwork
Value Added Time = 1710
Seconds
Total Lead Time = 18600
Seconds
C/T 60 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 5 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 3600 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
Receive Form Review One Card
Information
Custom Software
Enter information
into Software
Print Out Docs
Excel
Enter Key into
Spreadsheet
30 Seconds
0 Seconds
5 Seconds
14400 Seconds
360 Seconds
600 Seconds
180 Seconds
0 Seconds
360 Seconds
0 Seconds
C/T 5 Seconds
W/T 14400 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 30 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
C/T 120 Seconds
W/T 0 Seconds
U/P 100%
Shifts 1
Intermittent
DailyDeliveryofKeys
DailyDeliveryofApplications
Intermittent When there is a Problem Intermittent When there is a Problem
Key
Requested
• Returned keys per week
– Number of keys that are returned back to the
office per week
• Keys ordered per week
– Number of keys ordered per week by back office
when the keys requested are either unavailable or
inventory for the key is low
Appendix - KPI Metrics

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Motivated and creative developer
Motivated and creative developerMotivated and creative developer
Motivated and creative developer
Jason Wakeman
 
Пространство вариантов_final
Пространство вариантов_finalПространство вариантов_final
Пространство вариантов_finalVlad Berezin, PMP
 
Unit 25, Lesson 6
Unit 25, Lesson 6Unit 25, Lesson 6
Unit 25, Lesson 6
Ms. Mann
 
Dean Ryan exit was own choice
Dean Ryan exit was own choiceDean Ryan exit was own choice
Dean Ryan exit was own choice
Ian Morgan
 
Tran tuyet trang cdgdth11 a
Tran tuyet trang cdgdth11 aTran tuyet trang cdgdth11 a
Tran tuyet trang cdgdth11 atrangsaoke
 
Physics sample paper of ms
Physics sample paper of msPhysics sample paper of ms
Physics sample paper of ms
ayazkhan79
 
Margoth gaibor
Margoth gaiborMargoth gaibor
Margoth gaibor
KarenMargoth
 
Tarea de civil
Tarea de civilTarea de civil
Tarea de civil
yelitza montilla
 
Terras Alphaville Resende, RJ
Terras Alphaville Resende, RJ Terras Alphaville Resende, RJ
Terras Alphaville Resende, RJ
Colombo Gadelha Imóveis
 
Developing Creative Industries in Jordan - A Call to Action
Developing Creative Industries in Jordan - A Call to ActionDeveloping Creative Industries in Jordan - A Call to Action
Developing Creative Industries in Jordan - A Call to Action
Callum Lee
 
Unitat 5: L'ordinador i els perifèrics.
Unitat 5: L'ordinador i els perifèrics.Unitat 5: L'ordinador i els perifèrics.
Unitat 5: L'ordinador i els perifèrics.
rrodri83
 
Message Authentication Code & HMAC
Message Authentication Code & HMACMessage Authentication Code & HMAC
Message Authentication Code & HMAC
Krishna Gehlot
 
Desarrollo sustentable.
Desarrollo sustentable.Desarrollo sustentable.
Desarrollo sustentable.
Zurisadai Flores.
 
key distribution in network security
key distribution in network securitykey distribution in network security
key distribution in network security
babak danyal
 
LUMBAR PUNCTURE
LUMBAR PUNCTURELUMBAR PUNCTURE
LUMBAR PUNCTURE
Muhammad Nasrullah
 
5. message authentication and hash function
5. message authentication and hash function5. message authentication and hash function
5. message authentication and hash function
Chirag Patel
 
Hash Function
Hash FunctionHash Function
Hash Function
Siddharth Srivastava
 
Hash Function & Analysis
Hash Function & AnalysisHash Function & Analysis
Hash Function & Analysis
Pawandeep Kaur
 
Dzarasov R. Conventional Theory of a Firm.
Dzarasov R. Conventional Theory of a Firm.Dzarasov R. Conventional Theory of a Firm.
Dzarasov R. Conventional Theory of a Firm.
Ruslan Dzarasov
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Motivated and creative developer
Motivated and creative developerMotivated and creative developer
Motivated and creative developer
 
Пространство вариантов_final
Пространство вариантов_finalПространство вариантов_final
Пространство вариантов_final
 
Unit 25, Lesson 6
Unit 25, Lesson 6Unit 25, Lesson 6
Unit 25, Lesson 6
 
Permit User0001
Permit User0001Permit User0001
Permit User0001
 
Dean Ryan exit was own choice
Dean Ryan exit was own choiceDean Ryan exit was own choice
Dean Ryan exit was own choice
 
Tran tuyet trang cdgdth11 a
Tran tuyet trang cdgdth11 aTran tuyet trang cdgdth11 a
Tran tuyet trang cdgdth11 a
 
Physics sample paper of ms
Physics sample paper of msPhysics sample paper of ms
Physics sample paper of ms
 
Margoth gaibor
Margoth gaiborMargoth gaibor
Margoth gaibor
 
Tarea de civil
Tarea de civilTarea de civil
Tarea de civil
 
Terras Alphaville Resende, RJ
Terras Alphaville Resende, RJ Terras Alphaville Resende, RJ
Terras Alphaville Resende, RJ
 
Developing Creative Industries in Jordan - A Call to Action
Developing Creative Industries in Jordan - A Call to ActionDeveloping Creative Industries in Jordan - A Call to Action
Developing Creative Industries in Jordan - A Call to Action
 
Unitat 5: L'ordinador i els perifèrics.
Unitat 5: L'ordinador i els perifèrics.Unitat 5: L'ordinador i els perifèrics.
Unitat 5: L'ordinador i els perifèrics.
 
Message Authentication Code & HMAC
Message Authentication Code & HMACMessage Authentication Code & HMAC
Message Authentication Code & HMAC
 
Desarrollo sustentable.
Desarrollo sustentable.Desarrollo sustentable.
Desarrollo sustentable.
 
key distribution in network security
key distribution in network securitykey distribution in network security
key distribution in network security
 
LUMBAR PUNCTURE
LUMBAR PUNCTURELUMBAR PUNCTURE
LUMBAR PUNCTURE
 
5. message authentication and hash function
5. message authentication and hash function5. message authentication and hash function
5. message authentication and hash function
 
Hash Function
Hash FunctionHash Function
Hash Function
 
Hash Function & Analysis
Hash Function & AnalysisHash Function & Analysis
Hash Function & Analysis
 
Dzarasov R. Conventional Theory of a Firm.
Dzarasov R. Conventional Theory of a Firm.Dzarasov R. Conventional Theory of a Firm.
Dzarasov R. Conventional Theory of a Firm.
 

Similar to Lean Back Offices Project

Reduction of each transaction cycle time
Reduction of each transaction cycle timeReduction of each transaction cycle time
Reduction of each transaction cycle time
Yoke-Yin Purcaro
 
Mba 505 business_processes_operations_productivity_strategy_tutorial1s
Mba 505 business_processes_operations_productivity_strategy_tutorial1sMba 505 business_processes_operations_productivity_strategy_tutorial1s
Mba 505 business_processes_operations_productivity_strategy_tutorial1s
Chainon
 
5 Steps to implementing Lean
5  Steps to implementing Lean5  Steps to implementing Lean
5 Steps to implementing Lean
Julian Kalac P.Eng
 
Batch & Queue vs Lean Continuous Flow
Batch & Queue vs Lean Continuous FlowBatch & Queue vs Lean Continuous Flow
Batch & Queue vs Lean Continuous Flow
Julian Kalac P.Eng
 
Term Project
Term ProjectTerm Project
Term Project
Samhita Prajapati
 
Agile Dev West 2018_Measuring Flow: Metrics that Matter
Agile Dev West 2018_Measuring Flow: Metrics that MatterAgile Dev West 2018_Measuring Flow: Metrics that Matter
Agile Dev West 2018_Measuring Flow: Metrics that Matter
Julie Wyman
 
Value Stream Mapping in Office & Service Setttings
Value Stream Mapping in Office & Service SetttingsValue Stream Mapping in Office & Service Setttings
Value Stream Mapping in Office & Service Setttings
TKMG, Inc.
 
Quick Change Over (ENG)- PPT.pptx
Quick Change Over (ENG)- PPT.pptxQuick Change Over (ENG)- PPT.pptx
Quick Change Over (ENG)- PPT.pptx
RakibHosain4
 
Work measurement
Work measurementWork measurement
Work measurement
Huy Tạ Ngọc
 
Machining time and costs
Machining time and costsMachining time and costs
Machining time and costs
endika55
 
Ch5 process+analysis
Ch5 process+analysisCh5 process+analysis
Ch5 process+analysis
videoaakash15
 
Ch5 process analysis
Ch5 process analysisCh5 process analysis
Ch5 process analysis
videoaakash15
 
ch5-processanalysis-131122013048-phpapp02 (1).pptx
ch5-processanalysis-131122013048-phpapp02 (1).pptxch5-processanalysis-131122013048-phpapp02 (1).pptx
ch5-processanalysis-131122013048-phpapp02 (1).pptx
MukhtarMohamedAbdila
 
Process Mining and Data-Driven Process Simulation
Process Mining and Data-Driven Process SimulationProcess Mining and Data-Driven Process Simulation
Process Mining and Data-Driven Process Simulation
Marlon Dumas
 
KOAMTAC KDC 300 SCANNER
KOAMTAC KDC 300 SCANNERKOAMTAC KDC 300 SCANNER
KOAMTAC KDC 300 SCANNER
Peter Ward
 
Lean Manufacturing Project
Lean Manufacturing ProjectLean Manufacturing Project
Lean Manufacturing Project
Reinaldo Leopoldo
 
Olio ie training for all stuff
Olio ie training for all stuffOlio ie training for all stuff
Olio ie training for all stuff
MaududAhmmad
 
Operations scheduling
Operations schedulingOperations scheduling
Operations scheduling
RajThakuri
 
Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Metrics-Based Process MappingMetrics-Based Process Mapping
Metrics-Based Process Mapping
TKMG, Inc.
 
Process analysis
Process analysisProcess analysis
Process analysis
LokeshVijayvargyJaip
 

Similar to Lean Back Offices Project (20)

Reduction of each transaction cycle time
Reduction of each transaction cycle timeReduction of each transaction cycle time
Reduction of each transaction cycle time
 
Mba 505 business_processes_operations_productivity_strategy_tutorial1s
Mba 505 business_processes_operations_productivity_strategy_tutorial1sMba 505 business_processes_operations_productivity_strategy_tutorial1s
Mba 505 business_processes_operations_productivity_strategy_tutorial1s
 
5 Steps to implementing Lean
5  Steps to implementing Lean5  Steps to implementing Lean
5 Steps to implementing Lean
 
Batch & Queue vs Lean Continuous Flow
Batch & Queue vs Lean Continuous FlowBatch & Queue vs Lean Continuous Flow
Batch & Queue vs Lean Continuous Flow
 
Term Project
Term ProjectTerm Project
Term Project
 
Agile Dev West 2018_Measuring Flow: Metrics that Matter
Agile Dev West 2018_Measuring Flow: Metrics that MatterAgile Dev West 2018_Measuring Flow: Metrics that Matter
Agile Dev West 2018_Measuring Flow: Metrics that Matter
 
Value Stream Mapping in Office & Service Setttings
Value Stream Mapping in Office & Service SetttingsValue Stream Mapping in Office & Service Setttings
Value Stream Mapping in Office & Service Setttings
 
Quick Change Over (ENG)- PPT.pptx
Quick Change Over (ENG)- PPT.pptxQuick Change Over (ENG)- PPT.pptx
Quick Change Over (ENG)- PPT.pptx
 
Work measurement
Work measurementWork measurement
Work measurement
 
Machining time and costs
Machining time and costsMachining time and costs
Machining time and costs
 
Ch5 process+analysis
Ch5 process+analysisCh5 process+analysis
Ch5 process+analysis
 
Ch5 process analysis
Ch5 process analysisCh5 process analysis
Ch5 process analysis
 
ch5-processanalysis-131122013048-phpapp02 (1).pptx
ch5-processanalysis-131122013048-phpapp02 (1).pptxch5-processanalysis-131122013048-phpapp02 (1).pptx
ch5-processanalysis-131122013048-phpapp02 (1).pptx
 
Process Mining and Data-Driven Process Simulation
Process Mining and Data-Driven Process SimulationProcess Mining and Data-Driven Process Simulation
Process Mining and Data-Driven Process Simulation
 
KOAMTAC KDC 300 SCANNER
KOAMTAC KDC 300 SCANNERKOAMTAC KDC 300 SCANNER
KOAMTAC KDC 300 SCANNER
 
Lean Manufacturing Project
Lean Manufacturing ProjectLean Manufacturing Project
Lean Manufacturing Project
 
Olio ie training for all stuff
Olio ie training for all stuffOlio ie training for all stuff
Olio ie training for all stuff
 
Operations scheduling
Operations schedulingOperations scheduling
Operations scheduling
 
Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Metrics-Based Process MappingMetrics-Based Process Mapping
Metrics-Based Process Mapping
 
Process analysis
Process analysisProcess analysis
Process analysis
 

More from Parag Kapile

IE7610_REPORT_GROUP_8
IE7610_REPORT_GROUP_8IE7610_REPORT_GROUP_8
IE7610_REPORT_GROUP_8
Parag Kapile
 
report kapile_fx7378
report kapile_fx7378report kapile_fx7378
report kapile_fx7378
Parag Kapile
 
Project Presentation_fx7378_fy6055
Project Presentation_fx7378_fy6055Project Presentation_fx7378_fy6055
Project Presentation_fx7378_fy6055
Parag Kapile
 
GROUP PROJECT REPORT_FY6055_FX7378
GROUP PROJECT REPORT_FY6055_FX7378GROUP PROJECT REPORT_FY6055_FX7378
GROUP PROJECT REPORT_FY6055_FX7378
Parag Kapile
 
Individual Project
Individual ProjectIndividual Project
Individual Project
Parag Kapile
 
Optimization of International student expenses at Wayne state ppt
Optimization of International student expenses at Wayne state pptOptimization of International student expenses at Wayne state ppt
Optimization of International student expenses at Wayne state ppt
Parag Kapile
 
design n testing of tool used in press shop
design n testing of tool used in press shopdesign n testing of tool used in press shop
design n testing of tool used in press shop
Parag Kapile
 

More from Parag Kapile (7)

IE7610_REPORT_GROUP_8
IE7610_REPORT_GROUP_8IE7610_REPORT_GROUP_8
IE7610_REPORT_GROUP_8
 
report kapile_fx7378
report kapile_fx7378report kapile_fx7378
report kapile_fx7378
 
Project Presentation_fx7378_fy6055
Project Presentation_fx7378_fy6055Project Presentation_fx7378_fy6055
Project Presentation_fx7378_fy6055
 
GROUP PROJECT REPORT_FY6055_FX7378
GROUP PROJECT REPORT_FY6055_FX7378GROUP PROJECT REPORT_FY6055_FX7378
GROUP PROJECT REPORT_FY6055_FX7378
 
Individual Project
Individual ProjectIndividual Project
Individual Project
 
Optimization of International student expenses at Wayne state ppt
Optimization of International student expenses at Wayne state pptOptimization of International student expenses at Wayne state ppt
Optimization of International student expenses at Wayne state ppt
 
design n testing of tool used in press shop
design n testing of tool used in press shopdesign n testing of tool used in press shop
design n testing of tool used in press shop
 

Lean Back Offices Project

  • 1. Back Office Process “Key” Distribution Process at WSU Engineering Business Office Abishek Anand Shruti Baug Joel Fortgang Kara Wandrie Parag Kapile
  • 2. Engineering Business Office (EBO) • Key Distribution Process to give key to open engineering rooms consists of 2 employees: 1. Kathryn- Primary contact with the system. 2.Eman- Student assistant. She is responsible for placing keys on and off the rack, maintaining inventory and filling in spreadsheets. • 10 keys are requested per week. • Heavy load during the commencement of semester.
  • 3. Purpose of the Project • Kathryn who is the primary contact with the system has to spend too much time and too much effort on the system. • The purpose of the project is find the root cause of the problem, find the appropriate solution for the problem and to make Kathryn work easy and efficient.
  • 4. Flow Chart for “Key” Process
  • 6. New Key Request • Completed Key Request Form is submitted to EBO. (10 mins) • Information from the form is filled in the EBO system, excel sheet and print out is taken and maintained in a file.(15 mins)
  • 7.
  • 8. New Request cont.. • Tag # is obtained by entering the room # from the system. (2 mins) • Tag # is located in the key box.(10 mins)
  • 9.
  • 10. New Key Request cont... • Corresponding key from the Tag # is selected. • Key is put in the envelope. • Key # is filled in the form, and envelope is stapled to the request form and passed to front desk. (5 mins) • Customer is emailed to pick up the key. • Customer must show ID and sign request at pick up.
  • 11. Current State Value Stream Map Supplier/Customer Receive Form Review One Card Information Custom Software Enter information into Software Print Out Docs Excel Enter Key into Spreadsheet Find Tag Take Key Return Tag Give Student Key File Paperwork 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 5 Seconds 14400 Seconds 360 Seconds 600 Seconds 180 Seconds 0 Seconds 360 Seconds 0 Seconds 600 Seconds 0 Seconds 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 20 Seconds 0 Seconds 5 Seconds 0 Seconds 120 Seconds 3600 Seconds 5 Sets of Paperwork Value Added Time = 1710 Seconds Total Lead Time = 18600 Seconds C/T 5 Seconds W/T 14400 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 60 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 5 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 3600 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 Production Control Intermittent when problems DailyDeliveryofKeys DailyDeliveryofApplications Daily Delivery of Applications Daily Delivery of Keys Intermittent when problems Intermittent
  • 12. Current State Value Stream Map Supplier/Customer Production Control Intermittent when problems Daily Delivery of Applications Daily Delivery of Keys Intermittent when problems Receive Form Review One Card Information Custom Software Enter information into Software 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 5 Seconds 14400 Seconds 360 Seconds 600 Seconds 0 Seconds C/T 5 Seconds W/T 14400 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 IntermittentPrint Out Docs Excel Enter Key into Spreadsheet Find Tag Take Key 180 Seconds 0 Seconds 360 Seconds 0 Seconds 600 Seconds 0 Seconds 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 0 Sec C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 60 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 Intermittent when problems Return Tag Give Student Key File Paperwork 20 Seconds 0 Seconds 5 Seconds 0 Seconds 120 Seconds 3600 Seconds 5 Sets of Paperwork Value Added Time = 1710 Seconds Total Lead Time = 18600 Seconds C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 5 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 3600 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 Supplier/Customer Production Control Intermittent when problems Daily Delivery of Applications Daily Delivery of Keys Intermittent when problems
  • 13. KPI Metrics • Labor time spent per key – Total labor hours spent per keys issued in a week = Total # of minutes spent/ #of keys issued per week = 15 minutes (from Gemba walk)
  • 14. • Average Lead time – Total time taken from the time student drops off form until receiving the key – Measured in minutes – Average lead time is 28.5 minutes KPI Metrics
  • 15. • Average number of keys issued – Number of keys issued per week = Total # of keys issued / # of weeks = 131/13 = 10 KPI Metrics
  • 16. Key Request per week 24 16 11 3 8 10 12 6 15 13 6 1 6 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Gemba Walk Key Request/Week
  • 17. • Takt time – Available time / Customer demand = 40 hours / 10 keys per week = 4 hours per key per week KPI Metrics
  • 18. • Kathryn and Eman utilize a lot of time distributing, ordering keys, and entering data into system. This consumes a lot of time for personnel in the engineering office. Current labor time spent per key is 15 minutes and the desired labor time is under 6 minutes. Problem Statement
  • 19. ● 5 Hypotheses ○ The physical access to the keys is challenging. ○ The record keeping takes up a lot of valuable time. ○ Keys are not returned so new keys must continually be made. ○ Takes too long to procure keys for the students. ○ Wayne States key ordering process takes too much effort. Plan – 5 Whys Why are Kathryn and Eman are spending to much of their day working on distributing keys?
  • 20. ● 5 Hypotheses ○ The physical access to the keys is challenging. ○ The record keeping takes up a lot of valuable time. ○ Keys are not returned so new keys must continually be made. ○ Takes too long to procure keys for the students. ○ Wayne States key ordering process takes too much effort. ● Evidence ○ Value Stream: Record keeping is where most of the active time is spent. ● Controllable: No Plan – 5 Whys Why are Kathryn and Eman are spending to much of their day working on distributing keys?
  • 21. ● 4 Hypotheses ○ The Paper work is not uniformed ○ The recording system is convoluted ○ Paper Binders are hard to work with ○ Inaccurate Paper Work Plan – 5 Whys Why does the record keeping take so much time?
  • 22. ● 4 Hypotheses ○ The Paper work is not uniformed ○ The recording system is convoluted ○ Paper Binders are hard to work with ○ Inaccurate Paper Work ● Evidence ○ Gemba Walk: Operators complain about software system ● Controllable: No Plan – 5 Whys Why does the record keeping take so much time?
  • 23. ● 3 Hypotheses ○ There are multiple systems being used ○ The excel spreadsheet is too complicated ○ The software design is confusing Plan – 5 Whys Why is the recording system problematic?
  • 24. ● 3 Hypotheses ○ There are multiple systems being used ○ The excel spreadsheet is too complicated ○ The software design is confusing ● Evidence ○ Flow Chart-The same work is done three times ● Controllable - Yes Plan – 5 Whys Why is the recording system problematic?
  • 25. Plan - 4S for Excess Time Consumption Order Skill Suppliers Systems Surrounding s Key manufacturer Key delivery from the manufacturer Unreadable Forms Untrained Employee Manpower Shortage Software Duplication Software Outdated Sending Multiple Reminders/e-mails Concerned customer not available Disorganized key cabinet Excess time consumption
  • 26. Surrounding Suppliers Systems Delivering key without form Customers Losing key Customers returning key Reordering new keys Unassigned keys Mismatch Keys Untagged keys Excess Cost Plan- 3S for Excess Cost
  • 27. Plan- Future State Value Stream Map Supplier/Customer Receive Form Review One Card Information Check software for Tag # and if Key is Available Custom Software Enter User info into Software Find Tag Take Key Return Tag Give Student Key 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 5 Seconds 14400 Seconds 60 Seconds 600 Seconds 120 Seconds 0 Seconds 600 Seconds 0 Seconds 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 20 Seconds 0 Seconds 5 Seconds 0 Seconds Value Added Time = 870 Seconds Total Lead Time = 15000 Seconds C/T 5 Seconds W/T 14400 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 60 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 60 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 5 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 Production Control Weekly DailyDeliveryofKeys DailyDeliveryofApplications Daily Delivery of Applications Daily Delivery of Keys Intermittent when problems Intermittent Weekly
  • 28. Plan- Future State Value Stream Map Supplier/Customer Production Control Weekly Daily Delivery of Applications Daily Delivery of Keys Intermittent when problems Weekly Supplier/Customer Production Control Daily Delivery of Applications Daily Delivery of Keys Intermittent when problems Receive Form Review One Card Information Check software for Tag # and if Key is Available Custom Software Enter User info into Software 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 5 Seconds 14400 Seconds 60 Seconds 600 Seconds 120 Seconds 0 Seconds 0 Seconds C/T 5 Seconds W/T 14400 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 60 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 Weekly Dail Intermittent Weekly Find Tag Take Key Return Tag Give Student Key 600 Seconds Seconds 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 20 Seconds 0 Seconds 5 Seconds 0 Seconds Value Added Time = 870 Seconds Total Lead Time = 15000 Seconds C/T 60 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 5 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 Daily
  • 29. Plan- Improvements in Future State • Eliminated 2 process steps • Added 2 levels of status communication • Lead time – Current State = 28.5 minutes – Future State = 14.5 minutes • Labor time – Current State = 15 minutes – Future State = 3 minutes
  • 30. Plan – Design Decisions To Merge Recording Processes • Decision Variable – Time to Process Key – Cost in dollars – Training Requirements – Support / Stability – Data Import / Initial Data Entry – Oversight
  • 31. Plan – Design Alternatives • One System – Paper Only – Excel Spreadsheet Only – Existing Custom Software – New Software
  • 32. Plan – New Software Alternatives • Custom - $ Unknown • Key Wizard- $1200 – http://www.keywizard.net/ • Tracer 9 - $900 – https://www.dlaco.com/tracerxt/ • Key Organizer - $600 – https://www.aidex-software.com/en/key- organizer/
  • 33. Plan – Evaluation Matrix Criteria Weight Paper System Spread Sheet Existing Software Custom Software Key Wizard Tracer 9 Key Organizer Process Time 5 1 2 2 4 4 3 3 Cost in dollars 8 4 4 4 1 3 3 2 Training 1 2 2 1 4 3 3 3 Support / Stability 2 1 1 2 2 3 2 4 Import / Initial 3 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 Oversight 3 1 1 1 4 3 4 3 Totals 50 55 61 68 77 69 70
  • 34. Do - Method for Small Scale Test • Obtain Key Wizard Trial Version • Train Eman (Student Assistant) in Key Wizard • For One Week • Enter Data into Both System • Record Time for Each System
  • 35. Check - Small Scale Test • Compare Average Times to Process for Existing • Evaluation Time Savings per Week • Compute New KPI – Average Labor Time Per Key • Determine ROI on Key Wizard • Present Findings to Lara (Office Manager) • Lara Determines if Plan should be implemented, or go back to plan
  • 36. Act - Full Implementation • Determine Week of Low Key Demand from Historic Data • Convert Existing Data into Key Wizard • Train Staff (Kathryn, Lara and Eman) • Begin Processing Keys
  • 37. Expected Results • Key Process Labor Time Reduction from 15 minutes to under 6 minutes • Greater Long Term Stability of System • Better Oversight for Office Manager (Lara)
  • 38. Review/Loop-Do we need to Keep going • Ongoing – Review Key Process Numbers Every Semester for Employee performance – Contact Key Wizard Manufacturer for Updates Once a year • Another PDCA Cycle – Look at all KPI’s – Revisit Customer Viewpoint – Determine if another Cycle is needed
  • 39. A3- Report Projected Business Performance Improvement Story [BPIS] Prior State Problem Statement Process Analysis Gemab Walk, Flow Chart, Current VSM Map KPI Definitions, Key Performance Metrics 5 Why Analysis, Fishbone Diagram Design Initiatives Implementation Results Future Value Stream, Solution Criteria, Solution Alternatives, Evaluation Matrix Do Explanation, Check Explanation, Act Explanation, Review and Loop Expected Results Explanation, Process Labort Reduced 23 %
  • 40. Questions • This is how we climb the Staircase
  • 41. ● Standardize Form ● Place Forms On-Line ● Review Software Alternatives with Staff for better evaluation criteria ● Organize Key Boxes ● Replace Key Boxes Appendix -Further Recommendations
  • 42. ● Develop Online Request System ● Record phone number of student ● Prevent graduation for non-return keys ● Charge a deposit Appendix -Further Recommendations
  • 43. ● http://www.prosystech.ca/overviewsk.aspx ● http://www.keywizard.net/prices.html ● https://www.dlaco.com/tracerxt/tracer1.htm ● http://www.instakey.com/key-control-software/ ● http://www.morsewatchmans.com/product/keywatcher/key- control-software/ ● https://www.aidex-software.com/en/key-organizer/ https://www.keytracker.com/Product/Category/Key-Control- Software ● Software Written By Computer Science Class Appendix - Software List
  • 44. ● Hypotheses ○ The physical access to the keys is challenging. ■ Evidence - The key cabinet is hard to access and is very un-organized. ○ The record keeping takes up a lot of valuable time. ■ Evidence - Value Stream: Record keeping is where most of the active time is spent. ○ Keys are not returned so new keys must continually be made. ■ Evidence - They have a set process to follow if a key is requested and cannot be found because someone else didn’t return it after use. ○ Takes too long to procure keys for the students. ■ Evidence - They make the students come to the office just to fill out paper work then leave and make them come back when the key is ready. ○ Wayne States key ordering process takes too much effort. ■ Evidence -he students have to come in to fill out forms and then later have to come back to pick it up. Appendix – 5 Whys Why are Kathryn and Eman are spending to much of their day working on distributing keys?
  • 45. ● Hypotheses ○ The Paper work is not uniformed ■ Evidence - Gemba Walk: Inspection of Paperwork ○ The recording system is convoluted ■ Evidence- Gemba Walk: Operators complain about software system ○ Paper Binders are hard to work with ■ Evidence- Gemba Walk: Photos of binders ○ Inaccurate Paper Work ■ Evidence - Gemba Walk: Interview with Kathryn Appendix – 5 Whys Why does the record keeping take so much time?
  • 46. ● Hypotheses ○ There are multiple systems being used ■ Evidence - Flow Chart: The same work is done three times ○ The excel spreadsheet is too complicated ■ Evidence - Gemba Walk: Example of the spreadsheet ○ The software design is confusing ■ Evidence - Gemba Walk: Photos of interface Appendix– 5 Whys Why is the recording system problematic?
  • 47. Appendix- Key Order Flowchart
  • 48. Appendix- Current Value Stream Map of all Processes Value Added Time = 30065 Seconds Total Lead Time = 7200 Seconds 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 60 Seconds 0 Seconds Supplier Online Form External Processing Key is Ready Email Key Pick Up KeyNeeds tobe made Enter Key into Software Enter Key into Spreadsheet ForStock Put Key in Envelope ForHandingOut Send Pick Up Email Pick up of Key KeyExists Receive Key After Use Enter Key into Software Enter Key into Spreadsheet Find Tag Put Tag on Key Return Tag with Key KeyReturn Go to Key Request Loop KeyDoesn’tExist Find Tag Put Tag on Key Return Tag with Key 300 Seconds 14400 Seconds 28800 Seconds 0 Seconds 5 Seconds 0 Seconds 600 Seconds 3600 Seconds 120 Seconds 3600 Seconds 120 Seconds 0 Seconds 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 60 Seconds 0 Seconds 120 Seconds 14400 Seconds Value Added Time = 30155 Seconds Total Lead Time = 21600 Seconds 30 Seconds 14400 Seconds 120 Seconds 7200 Seconds 120 Seconds 0 Seconds 60 Seconds 0 Seconds 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 30 Seconds 0 Seconds Value Added Time = 390 Seconds Total Lead Time = 21600 Seconds C/T 30 Seconds W/T 14400 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 7200 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 60 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 60 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 14400 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 60 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 3600 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 600 Seconds W/T 3600 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 5 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 28800 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 300 Seconds W/T 14400 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 File Paperwork 120 Seconds 3600 Seconds 120 Seconds 3600 Seconds C/T 120 Seconds W/T 3600 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 File Paperwork C/T 120 Seconds W/T 3600 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 File Paperwork C/T 120 Seconds W/T 3600 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 120 Seconds 3600 Seconds Customer PC = Manager Intermittent Intermittent Intermittent Find Tag Take Key Return Tag Give Student Key File Paperwork 600 Seconds 0 Seconds 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 20 Seconds 0 Seconds 5 Seconds 0 Seconds 120 Seconds 3600 Seconds 5 Sets of Paperwork Value Added Time = 1710 Seconds Total Lead Time = 18600 Seconds C/T 60 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 5 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 3600 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 Receive Form Review One Card Information Custom Software Enter information into Software Print Out Docs Excel Enter Key into Spreadsheet 30 Seconds 0 Seconds 5 Seconds 14400 Seconds 360 Seconds 600 Seconds 180 Seconds 0 Seconds 360 Seconds 0 Seconds C/T 5 Seconds W/T 14400 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 30 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 C/T 120 Seconds W/T 0 Seconds U/P 100% Shifts 1 Intermittent DailyDeliveryofKeys DailyDeliveryofApplications Intermittent When there is a Problem Intermittent When there is a Problem Key Requested
  • 49. • Returned keys per week – Number of keys that are returned back to the office per week • Keys ordered per week – Number of keys ordered per week by back office when the keys requested are either unavailable or inventory for the key is low Appendix - KPI Metrics