1
elearning@SHU – a case study
Paul Helm
Associate Head: Learning Technology
p.a.helm@shu.ac.uk
www.shu.ac.uk/e-learning
2
A bit of context
– There is a need for research on university teaching,
including the application of the new methods of
communication made available by modern technology.
The need is now for experiment
– Conventional teaching procedures are based on
lectures – there needs to be a re-examination of both the
purposes and techniques involved and more extensive
use made of new methods
– The programme was launched to encourage the higher
education sector to work collaboratively and explore
how new technologies could be exploited to improve
and maintain quality within teaching
3
SHU Learning, Teaching and
Assessment Strategy
• Teaching Quality Enhancement
– Flexible learning opportunities
– Appropriate use of ICTs
– Support for a diversity of learners
4
Drivers
• External
– Govt initiatives, LLL, LearnDirect, e-university
– Employers
– Competition in HE sector
• Internal
– Pedagogy
– Student expectations
– Staff interest
• Contradictory – quality, cost, effectiveness
5
Choices
• The do nothing university
• Borderless education
• The add on solution
• Full integration
• Partial integration
• Phased?
6
Choices
• Learner strategies
• Student support
• Staff development
• Balance between conventional and e-
learning approaches
• Quality and standards
• Selective and developmental change
7
Barriers
• Infrastructure
– Support IT? Or learning and teaching?
• Time
• Academic view of e-learning:
– Different vocabulary; relies on IT; academic
dependent on expertise of others; privacy and
ownership; disaggregate the teaching role;
another weapon in the armoury;
8
Successes
• Hybrids, breaking down barriers
• Secondments
• Different types of support, (different
types of dependency)
• Student feedback
• Low tech innovations
• Devolved approach
9
Could do better
• Portal wars
• The enthusiasts
• Staff feeling exposed
• CAA
• Devolved approach
10
Trends
• Face to face learning opportunities
will continue for most students
• Viral growth in web
enabled/supported learning
• The imperative of the networked
university
• Opportunities and challenges of
(dis)investment
11
A glimpse of the future
• The “new” students
• From enquiry and application to enrolment
• Cohort management, records, progress files
• Synchronous and asynchronous interaction
• Timed release of content/activities
• Assessment (self, formative, summative)

IWMW 2001: E-Learning at SHU

  • 1.
    1 elearning@SHU – acase study Paul Helm Associate Head: Learning Technology p.a.helm@shu.ac.uk www.shu.ac.uk/e-learning
  • 2.
    2 A bit ofcontext – There is a need for research on university teaching, including the application of the new methods of communication made available by modern technology. The need is now for experiment – Conventional teaching procedures are based on lectures – there needs to be a re-examination of both the purposes and techniques involved and more extensive use made of new methods – The programme was launched to encourage the higher education sector to work collaboratively and explore how new technologies could be exploited to improve and maintain quality within teaching
  • 3.
    3 SHU Learning, Teachingand Assessment Strategy • Teaching Quality Enhancement – Flexible learning opportunities – Appropriate use of ICTs – Support for a diversity of learners
  • 4.
    4 Drivers • External – Govtinitiatives, LLL, LearnDirect, e-university – Employers – Competition in HE sector • Internal – Pedagogy – Student expectations – Staff interest • Contradictory – quality, cost, effectiveness
  • 5.
    5 Choices • The donothing university • Borderless education • The add on solution • Full integration • Partial integration • Phased?
  • 6.
    6 Choices • Learner strategies •Student support • Staff development • Balance between conventional and e- learning approaches • Quality and standards • Selective and developmental change
  • 7.
    7 Barriers • Infrastructure – SupportIT? Or learning and teaching? • Time • Academic view of e-learning: – Different vocabulary; relies on IT; academic dependent on expertise of others; privacy and ownership; disaggregate the teaching role; another weapon in the armoury;
  • 8.
    8 Successes • Hybrids, breakingdown barriers • Secondments • Different types of support, (different types of dependency) • Student feedback • Low tech innovations • Devolved approach
  • 9.
    9 Could do better •Portal wars • The enthusiasts • Staff feeling exposed • CAA • Devolved approach
  • 10.
    10 Trends • Face toface learning opportunities will continue for most students • Viral growth in web enabled/supported learning • The imperative of the networked university • Opportunities and challenges of (dis)investment
  • 11.
    11 A glimpse ofthe future • The “new” students • From enquiry and application to enrolment • Cohort management, records, progress files • Synchronous and asynchronous interaction • Timed release of content/activities • Assessment (self, formative, summative)