This document summarizes sustainable practices for populating repositories described in a COAR report. It identifies three broad categories - incentives, integration, and mediation. Eight specific practices are profiled, including advocacy, institutional mandates, metrics, recruitment/deposit services, research biographies, publisher agreements, and direct deposit. Integration with research information systems and recruitment of students to assist with deposits are highlighted practices that have increased repository content at some institutions.
Scholarly Information Practices: Implications for Library Collections and Ser...OCLC Research
Overview of findings from a report (by Carole Palmer and colleagues, commissioned by OCLC Research) on scholarly information practices with some reflections on the implications of this work for library collections and services. From a presentation to the UC Berkeley Libraries' Roundtable Meeting, 12 March 2009.
Although library collaboration is common and many libraries collaborate through many organizations, it is a relatively unexamined aspect of library work. Many descriptions exist, but little from the point of view of organization and motivation. We will present a framework for thinking about library collaboration and draw out some of the challenges successful collaborations face. We will also consider how collaboration is evolving and how trends may be accelerated. We will emphasize that collaboration is a set of strategic and tactical choices, that it is very influenced by people and politics, and that collective action poses problems.
These dynamics are very much alive in questions around collective collections. We will look at collections as an example of the consolidation vs autonomy dynamic we observe in consortia generally. We also try and provide some guidance about how a collective collections initiative would be shaped – to identify points where decisions and commitments need to be made. We consider retrospective collection coordination (digitization, resource sharing, shared print) which currently tends to be layered over relatively autonomously developed collections, optimized at the institutional level, and prospective collection development (where libraries work together to optimize at the system level through collaborative collection development, licensing and so on). We consider some different dynamics with licensed and purchased materials, as well as institutionally created materials (research outputs, …).
Rediscoverying discovery: three general exampleslisld
Presented at CNI virtual meeting, an overview of some trends in library discovery. Considers how libraries are considering how to present a more holistic experience online.
Scholarly Information Practices: Implications for Library Collections and Ser...OCLC Research
Overview of findings from a report (by Carole Palmer and colleagues, commissioned by OCLC Research) on scholarly information practices with some reflections on the implications of this work for library collections and services. From a presentation to the UC Berkeley Libraries' Roundtable Meeting, 12 March 2009.
Although library collaboration is common and many libraries collaborate through many organizations, it is a relatively unexamined aspect of library work. Many descriptions exist, but little from the point of view of organization and motivation. We will present a framework for thinking about library collaboration and draw out some of the challenges successful collaborations face. We will also consider how collaboration is evolving and how trends may be accelerated. We will emphasize that collaboration is a set of strategic and tactical choices, that it is very influenced by people and politics, and that collective action poses problems.
These dynamics are very much alive in questions around collective collections. We will look at collections as an example of the consolidation vs autonomy dynamic we observe in consortia generally. We also try and provide some guidance about how a collective collections initiative would be shaped – to identify points where decisions and commitments need to be made. We consider retrospective collection coordination (digitization, resource sharing, shared print) which currently tends to be layered over relatively autonomously developed collections, optimized at the institutional level, and prospective collection development (where libraries work together to optimize at the system level through collaborative collection development, licensing and so on). We consider some different dynamics with licensed and purchased materials, as well as institutionally created materials (research outputs, …).
Rediscoverying discovery: three general exampleslisld
Presented at CNI virtual meeting, an overview of some trends in library discovery. Considers how libraries are considering how to present a more holistic experience online.
Presented by Chris Higgins at the Co-Design Workshop, Machynlleth, 16 October 2014. Half-way through a 4-year project to enable "citizen scientists" to use smartphones to upload crucial scientific data, this presentation shows the current state of progress on the COBWEB project.
Natalia Bermudes Qvortrup - Making the case for international library collabo...BOBCATSSS 2017
Natalia Bermudes Qvortrup
Making the case for international library collaborations with the global south: A comparative case study of Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford
Paper at BOBCATSSS 2017
NISO Two Day Virtual Conference:
Using the Web as an E-Content Distribution Platform:
Challenges and Opportunities
Oct 21-22, 2014
Frances Pinter, Founder and Executive Director, Knowledge Unlatched
The powers of consortia: scaling capacity, learning, innovation and influencelisld
Libraries and related organizations group together in a variety of ways to get their work done. They consort, for example, to lobby, to negotiate and license, and to build shared infrastructure.
However, there are other aspects of collective activity that are becoming more important. In fact, I suggest that two are increasingly central to successful library activity: these are learning and innovation.
Thinking this way about consortial activity suggests four areas where libraries come together to create scale advantages: capacity, learning, innovation, influence.
Some consortial organizations span several of these, some are more specialised.
This presentation will consider consortia under these headings. It will also briefly discuss how choices about scope, scale and sourcing are important decision points for consortia when considering their mission and investments.
Looking at Libraries, collections & technologylisld
**Important note - notes visible in downloaded presentation. **
An overview of research library collection trends. Presented in the context of changing demands of research and learning in a network environment. Behaviors shape technology; technology shapes behaviors. There is also some analysis of the RLUK collective collections study and a quick look at some characertistics of The Bodleian Libraries' collections.
Library Assessment Toolkit & Dashboard Scoping Research Final Report and Path...Megan Hurst
Athenaeum21 is pleased to announce the public release of “Library Assessment Toolkit & Dashboard Scoping Research Final Report and Path Forward." The report is the culmination of a six-month research project in collaboration with the University Library of the University of California, Davis; the Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford; and the Staats und Universitätsbibliothek, Göttingen, Germany. The research project examined how libraries currently assess their resources and services, and areas of opportunity to streamline and visualize library performance through a common and customizable set of key performance indicators (KPIs) and dashboard modules. The research team interviewed library assessment leaders and practitioners across diverse institutions and geographies, and reviewed the current landscape of technology, tools, and services addressing their needs.
[Click and drag to move]
The report concludes that "the majority of library managers approach assessment and evaluation in an ad hoc and reactive manner as questions arise. Managers spend valuable time manually collecting, cleaning, and normalizing data from diverse systems, and then perform one-time or static interpretations. The library managers that we interviewed during our research felt that the availability of a toolkit and dashboard could free them to probe and interpret more data, think more strategically, and develop more meaningful questions about measuring and evaluating library performance. While the scoping research focused on the performance of research libraries, the proposed toolkit and dashboard framework could be adopted and customized by any type of library, including smaller college and university libraries, community college libraries, and public libraries. Institutionalizing the project through sponsorship by an appropriate body or syndicate of libraries would help assure its extensibility nationally and internationally."
The Knowledge Exchange is a partnership of six national
organisations within Europe. As part of its ambition to make
Open Scholarship work, the Knowledge Exchange has developed
a Framework for Open Scholarship. This sets out the different
phases in the research life cycle against a variety of perspectives
that present barriers/challenges for Science/Scholarship to
be open, at the same time acknowledging that there are many
levels of stakeholders, reaching from individual researchers to
institutions to national governments. In this talk the presenters
will explain the partnership and share their recent report and
current work around Open Scholarship.
Chris Keene, Jisc
Bas Cordewener, Jisc/Knowledge Exchange
From local infrastructure to engagement - thinking about the library in the l...lisld
Libraries are rebalancing services and directions so that they are more active in the lives of their users. This presentation frames this discussion. It looks at shifts in user behaviours, collections, and spaces, and describes how OCLC Reseach is helping libraries make these transitions.
This presentation was given at the Minitex ILL Meeting in St Paul on 12 May 2015.
Changing role of faculty librarians in open accessIryna Kuchma
How faculty librarians could contribute to open access awareness raising and advocacy, provide support and training for researchers and students on changing scholarly communication landscape
The objective of this webinar is to provide an overview of COAR and its activities in support of the development of a global network of repositories. The vision of COAR is to build a seamless knowledge infrastructure through a global Open Access repository network. COAR pursues its vision through an active community of members engaged in working and interest groups, advocacy activities, and training opportunities. The webinar will showcase the work of COAR, the benefits of being part of the organization, collaborative activities, and achievements of COAR.
Presented by Chris Higgins at the Co-Design Workshop, Machynlleth, 16 October 2014. Half-way through a 4-year project to enable "citizen scientists" to use smartphones to upload crucial scientific data, this presentation shows the current state of progress on the COBWEB project.
Natalia Bermudes Qvortrup - Making the case for international library collabo...BOBCATSSS 2017
Natalia Bermudes Qvortrup
Making the case for international library collaborations with the global south: A comparative case study of Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford
Paper at BOBCATSSS 2017
NISO Two Day Virtual Conference:
Using the Web as an E-Content Distribution Platform:
Challenges and Opportunities
Oct 21-22, 2014
Frances Pinter, Founder and Executive Director, Knowledge Unlatched
The powers of consortia: scaling capacity, learning, innovation and influencelisld
Libraries and related organizations group together in a variety of ways to get their work done. They consort, for example, to lobby, to negotiate and license, and to build shared infrastructure.
However, there are other aspects of collective activity that are becoming more important. In fact, I suggest that two are increasingly central to successful library activity: these are learning and innovation.
Thinking this way about consortial activity suggests four areas where libraries come together to create scale advantages: capacity, learning, innovation, influence.
Some consortial organizations span several of these, some are more specialised.
This presentation will consider consortia under these headings. It will also briefly discuss how choices about scope, scale and sourcing are important decision points for consortia when considering their mission and investments.
Looking at Libraries, collections & technologylisld
**Important note - notes visible in downloaded presentation. **
An overview of research library collection trends. Presented in the context of changing demands of research and learning in a network environment. Behaviors shape technology; technology shapes behaviors. There is also some analysis of the RLUK collective collections study and a quick look at some characertistics of The Bodleian Libraries' collections.
Library Assessment Toolkit & Dashboard Scoping Research Final Report and Path...Megan Hurst
Athenaeum21 is pleased to announce the public release of “Library Assessment Toolkit & Dashboard Scoping Research Final Report and Path Forward." The report is the culmination of a six-month research project in collaboration with the University Library of the University of California, Davis; the Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford; and the Staats und Universitätsbibliothek, Göttingen, Germany. The research project examined how libraries currently assess their resources and services, and areas of opportunity to streamline and visualize library performance through a common and customizable set of key performance indicators (KPIs) and dashboard modules. The research team interviewed library assessment leaders and practitioners across diverse institutions and geographies, and reviewed the current landscape of technology, tools, and services addressing their needs.
[Click and drag to move]
The report concludes that "the majority of library managers approach assessment and evaluation in an ad hoc and reactive manner as questions arise. Managers spend valuable time manually collecting, cleaning, and normalizing data from diverse systems, and then perform one-time or static interpretations. The library managers that we interviewed during our research felt that the availability of a toolkit and dashboard could free them to probe and interpret more data, think more strategically, and develop more meaningful questions about measuring and evaluating library performance. While the scoping research focused on the performance of research libraries, the proposed toolkit and dashboard framework could be adopted and customized by any type of library, including smaller college and university libraries, community college libraries, and public libraries. Institutionalizing the project through sponsorship by an appropriate body or syndicate of libraries would help assure its extensibility nationally and internationally."
The Knowledge Exchange is a partnership of six national
organisations within Europe. As part of its ambition to make
Open Scholarship work, the Knowledge Exchange has developed
a Framework for Open Scholarship. This sets out the different
phases in the research life cycle against a variety of perspectives
that present barriers/challenges for Science/Scholarship to
be open, at the same time acknowledging that there are many
levels of stakeholders, reaching from individual researchers to
institutions to national governments. In this talk the presenters
will explain the partnership and share their recent report and
current work around Open Scholarship.
Chris Keene, Jisc
Bas Cordewener, Jisc/Knowledge Exchange
From local infrastructure to engagement - thinking about the library in the l...lisld
Libraries are rebalancing services and directions so that they are more active in the lives of their users. This presentation frames this discussion. It looks at shifts in user behaviours, collections, and spaces, and describes how OCLC Reseach is helping libraries make these transitions.
This presentation was given at the Minitex ILL Meeting in St Paul on 12 May 2015.
Changing role of faculty librarians in open accessIryna Kuchma
How faculty librarians could contribute to open access awareness raising and advocacy, provide support and training for researchers and students on changing scholarly communication landscape
The objective of this webinar is to provide an overview of COAR and its activities in support of the development of a global network of repositories. The vision of COAR is to build a seamless knowledge infrastructure through a global Open Access repository network. COAR pursues its vision through an active community of members engaged in working and interest groups, advocacy activities, and training opportunities. The webinar will showcase the work of COAR, the benefits of being part of the organization, collaborative activities, and achievements of COAR.
This presentation was provided by Tracy Bergstrom of Ithaka S+R, Todd Carpenter of NISO, Filip Jakobsen of Samhæng, Eva Jurczyk of the University of Toronto Libraries, Stacy McKenna of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Libraries, Jill Morris of PALCI and Boaz Nadav-Manes of Lehigh University, during the "Collaborative Collections Lifecycle Project Fall Update Webinar." The event was held virtually on September 27, 2023
Reviews the role of digital repositories in relation to the broader UK digital information environment, picks up on highlights, issues and trends. Intended to steer the work of JISC and others interested in furthering enhanced scholarly communication.
OSFair2017 Workshop | Building a global knowledge commons - ramping up reposi...Open Science Fair
Eloy Rodrigues, Petr Knoth & Kathleen Shearer showcase the conceptual model for this vision, as well as the role and functions of repositories within this model.
Workshop title: Building a global knowledge commons - ramping up repositories to support widespread change in the ecosystem
Workshop abstract:
The extensive international deployment of repository systems in higher education and research institutions, as well as scholarly communities, provides the foundation for a distributed, globally networked infrastructure for scholarly communication. This distributed network of repositories can and should be a powerful tool to promote the transformation of the scholarly communication ecosystem. However, repository platforms are still using technologies and protocols designed almost twenty years ago, before the boom of the web and the dominance of Google, social networking, semantic web and ubiquitous mobile devices. In April 2016, the Confederation of Open Access Repositories (COAR) launched a working group to help identify new functionalities and technologies for repositories and develop a road map for their adoption. For the past several months, the group has been working to define a vision for repositories and sketch out the priority user stories and scenarios that will help guide the development of new functionalities. The results of this work will be available in the summer of 2017.
This workshop will present the functionalities and technologies for the next generation of repositories and reflect on how these functionalities will be adopted into the existing software platforms. In addition, participants will discuss the important implications for the network layers, and how repositories will uniformly interact with the networks to provide value added services on top of their content.
DAY 3 - PARALLEL SESSION 6 & 7
http://www.opensciencefair.eu/workshops/parallel-day-3-1/building-a-global-knowledge-commons-ramping-up-repositories-to-support-widespread-change-in-the-ecosystem
HOW TO Setting up an open access repository, Policies and Legal Issues, Expanding Content & Increasing
Usage. Making a Case: Explaining the need for an open access repository & the expected benefits; Strategic Planning and Business Cases; Defining Scope
and Planning Checklists. Marketing and Advocacy. Repository policies. Open access policies & mandates. Legal issues
This presentation served as the slide deck used by Todd Carpenter of NISO, Sebastian Hammer of Index Data, Jill Morris of PALCI, and Boaz Nadav-Manes, of Lehigh University, during the public webinar on the "Collaborative Collections Lifecycle Project." The event was held virtually, on January 24, 2023.
Open Science, Open Data: towards a new transparent and reproducible ecosystemLIBER Europe
Presented at the Preforma Open Source Workshop 8 April 2016
As a library membership organization, LIBER works on addressing Open Science barriers. Standardisation of file formats can really help in overcoming some of these barriers: it enables us to process and preserve data in a controlled way, it helps ensure that outputs are really open and accessible in the long term and it improves interoperability of new tools and services. Making sure data is stored in a controlled way and can be (re) used today and in the future is an important element in Open Science. We see this as not only a technical challenge but also a social one: awareness, trust and community building is needed in order to ensure uptake of these standards. Libraries therefore have a valuable role to play in the development of good research data management throughout all phases of the Open Data lifecycle.
Presentation at COAR-SPARC conference “Connecting research, bridging communities, opening scholarship. University of Porto, Portugal, April 15-16, 2015
https://www.coar-repositories.org/news-media/coar-sparc-conference-2015-connecting-research-results-bridging-communities-opening-scholarship/
Presentation at COAR-SPARC Conference “Connecting research, bridging communities, opening scholarship". University of Porto, Portugal, April 15-16, 2015
sparc.arl.org/events/joint-coar-sparc-conference
The Future of Finding: Resource Discovery @ The University of OxfordMegan Hurst
The report is the culmination of a one-year multi-strand research project, and examines how users of the museums and libraries at the University of Oxford find the information they need (known as “resource discovery”), current practices among other institutions, and trends and possibilities for resource discovery in the future.
Athenaeum21 led the end-user research and needs assessment portion of the project, and then led the synthesis and analysis of the data across all of the research strands, making the recommendations and writing the final report. The report defines the resource discovery strategy for the University for the next 5 years.
The Future of Finding: Resource Discovery @ The University of OxfordChristine Madsen
The report is the culmination of a one-year multi-strand research project, and examines how users of the museums and libraries at the University of Oxford find the information they need (known as “resource discovery”), current practices among other institutions, and trends and possibilities for resource discovery in the future.
Athenaeum21 led the end-user research and needs assessment portion of the project, and then led the synthesis and analysis of the data across all of the research strands, making the recommendations and writing the final report. The report defines the resource discovery strategy for the University for the next 5 years.
Digital Academic Content and the Future of Libraries: International Cooperati...UBC Library
International Library Cooperation Symposium presentation May 14, 2010 in Tokyo, Japan.
Presentation by Ingrid Parent, President elect of IFLA, and University Librarian at the University of British Columbia
Notes from attending FORCE2019 conference in Edinburgh (October 15-18), covering a range of topics around Research Communications, e-Scholarship, Open Science and Open Access. Links on last slide for full conference programme and presented materials available online.
Umowy dot. autorskich praw majątkowych w praktyce wydawców książek naukowychPlatforma Otwartej Nauki
Umowy dot. autorskich praw majątkowych w praktyce wydawców książek naukowych
dr Sybilla Stanisławska-Kloc (UJ)
Webinarium "Prawne aspekty publikowania otwartych monografii” organizowane przez Platformę Otwartej Nauki i Komisję ds. Wydawnictw Naukowych przy KRASP.
15 grudnia 2022
Prawne aspekty otwartego dostępu
Krzysztof Siewicz
Webinarium "Prawne aspekty publikowania otwartych monografii” organizowane przez Platformę Otwartej Nauki i Komisję ds. Wydawnictw Naukowych przy KRASP.
15 grudnia 2022
Monografie Naukowe - Uniwersytet Śląski
Beata Klyta (UŚ)
Webinarium "Techniczne aspekty publikowania otwartych monografii” organizowane przez Platformę Otwartej Nauki i Komisję ds. Wydawnictw Naukowych przy KRASP.
21 listopada 2022
DSpace - doświadczenia Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Aleksandra Brzozowska (UŁ)
Webinarium "Techniczne aspekty publikowania otwartych monografii” organizowane przez Platformę Otwartej Nauki i Komisję ds. Wydawnictw Naukowych przy KRASP.
21 listopada 2022
Platforma czasopism Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Katarzyna Smyczek (UŁ)
Webinarium "Techniczne aspekty publikowania otwartych monografii” organizowane przez Platformę Otwartej Nauki i Komisję ds. Wydawnictw Naukowych przy KRASP.
21 listopada 2022
Biblioteka Nauki - techniczne możliwości wymiany metadanych
Jak Ciarka (ICM UW)
Webinarium "Techniczne aspekty publikowania otwartych monografii” organizowane przez Platformę Otwartej Nauki i Komisję ds. Wydawnictw Naukowych przy KRASP.
21 listopada 2022
Monografie w Bibliotece Nauki
Ryszard Burek (ICM UW)
Webinarium "Techniczne aspekty publikowania otwartych monografii” organizowane przez Platformę Otwartej Nauki i Komisję ds. Wydawnictw Naukowych przy KRASP.
21 listopada 2022
Open Science Platform. Facilitating Open Science in Poland
Natalia Gruenpeter
Wystąpienie podczas EOSC Festival – the National Tripartite Event Poland
"Otwarta Nauka dla lepszej nauki// Open Science for Better Science"
26 października: EOSC i otwarta nauka w praktyce // EOSC and Open Science in Practice
OpenAIRE Services for Open Science
Natalia Gruenpeter
Wystąpienie podczas EOSC Festival – the National Tripartite Event Poland
"Otwarta Nauka dla lepszej nauki// Open Science for Better Science"
26 października: EOSC i otwarta nauka w praktyce // EOSC and Open Science in Practice
Publikacje Ośrodka Badawczego Facta Ficta w Bibliotece Nauki
Joanna Brońka (Ośrodek Badawczy Facta Ficta)
Prezentacja podczas webinarium z okazji udostępnienia w Bibliotece Nauki ponad 500 000 artykułów
15 listopada 2022
Platforma Otwartej Nauki
http://pon.edu.pl/aktualnosci/226-ponad-pol-miliona-artykulow-w-bibliotece-nauki
PRESSto Platfoma otwartych czasopism naukowych Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Aleksandra Szulc (Redakcja PRESSto, UAM)
Prezentacja podczas webinarium z okazji udostępnienia w Bibliotece Nauki ponad 500 000 artykułów
15 listopada 2022
Platforma Otwartej Nauki
http://pon.edu.pl/aktualnosci/226-ponad-pol-miliona-artykulow-w-bibliotece-nauki
Publikacje Instytutu Historii Ukrainy w Bibliotece Nauki
Stepan Vidnyanskyj (Instytut Historii Ukrainy, Narodowa Akademia Nauk Ukrainy
Prezentacja podczas webinarium z okazji udostępnienia w Bibliotece Nauki ponad 500 000 artykułów
15 listopada 2022
Platforma Otwartej Nauki
http://pon.edu.pl/aktualnosci/226-ponad-pol-miliona-artykulow-w-bibliotece-nauki
Polska Akademia Nauk a otwarta nauka
Monika Małecka-Krawczyk (Biuro Upowszechniania i Promocji Nauki, Polska Akademia Nauk)
Prezentacja podczas webinarium z okazji udostępnienia w Bibliotece Nauki ponad 500 000 artykułów
15 listopada 2022
Platforma Otwartej Nauki
http://pon.edu.pl/aktualnosci/226-ponad-pol-miliona-artykulow-w-bibliotece-nauki
Otwarty dostęp do publikacji naukowych GUS - doświadczenia i wyzwania
Xavery Stańczyk (GUS)
Prezentacja podczas webinarium z okazji udostępnienia w Bibliotece Nauki ponad 500 000 artykułów
15 listopada 2022
Platforma Otwartej Nauki
http://pon.edu.pl/aktualnosci/226-ponad-pol-miliona-artykulow-w-bibliotece-nauki
Making Open Access Book Funding Work Fairly
Opening the Future, CEU Press,
Emily Poznanski (Central European University Press)
4.10.2022 r - webinarium Platformy Otwartej Nauki organizowane we współpracy z Komisją ds. Wydawnictw Naukowych przy KRASP.
More information:
http://pon.edu.pl/aktualnosci/219-webinarium-na-temat-modeli-biznesowym-publikowania-otwartych-monografii
UCL Press. The UK's first fully open access university press
Lara Speicher (University College London Press)
4.10.2022 r - webinarium Platformy Otwartej Nauki organizowane we współpracy z Komisją ds. Wydawnictw Naukowych przy KRASP.
More information:
http://pon.edu.pl/aktualnosci/219-webinarium-na-temat-modeli-biznesowym-publikowania-otwartych-monografii
Funding open access books at Open Book Publishers: A practical overview
Lucy Barnes
4.10.2022 r - webinarium Platformy Otwartej Nauki organizowane we współpracy z Komisją ds. Wydawnictw Naukowych przy KRASP.
More information:
http://pon.edu.pl/aktualnosci/219-webinarium-na-temat-modeli-biznesowym-publikowania-otwartych-monografii
Arianna Becerril García – Redalyc: A platform to advance non-commercial Open ...Platforma Otwartej Nauki
Discussion panel during the conference celebrating the public launch of the new platform of the Library of Science (https://bibliotekanauki.pl), developed by the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling, University of Warsaw, in cooperation with publishers, journal editorial boards, and indexing databases.
The Library of Science is an Open Access collection of Polish scientific journals and books. All the resources are available as full texts with metadata.
Panelists presented their individual experiences from the development of local and regional infrastructures for Open Access to scientific journals.
Panelists:
Arianna Becerril García (Redalyc)
Miroslav Milinović (HRČAK)
Susan Murray (AJOL)
Ritsuko Nakajima (J-STAGE)
Abel L Packer (SciELO)
moderator: Krzysztof Siewicz (ICM UW)
Recording: https://youtu.be/q8bfstI5vpE
The new version of the platform was developed in the framework of the “Platform of Polish Scientific Publications” project, co-financed from the European Regional Development Fund, 2nd priority axis of the Operational Program Digital Poland 2014-2020, Measure 2.3 (total project value: PLN 5,164,777.78, co-financing from European Funds: PLN 4,370,951.43).
Discussion panel during the conference celebrating the public launch of the new platform of the Library of Science (https://bibliotekanauki.pl), developed by the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling, University of Warsaw, in cooperation with publishers, journal editorial boards, and indexing databases.
The Library of Science is an Open Access collection of Polish scientific journals and books. All the resources are available as full texts with metadata.
Panelists presented their individual experiences from the development of local and regional infrastructures for Open Access to scientific journals.
Panelists:
Arianna Becerril García (Redalyc)
Miroslav Milinović (HRČAK)
Susan Murray (AJOL)
Ritsuko Nakajima (J-STAGE)
Abel L Packer (SciELO)
moderator: Krzysztof Siewicz (ICM UW)
Recording: https://youtu.be/q8bfstI5vpE
The new version of the platform was developed in the framework of the “Platform of Polish Scientific Publications” project, co-financed from the European Regional Development Fund, 2nd priority axis of the Operational Program Digital Poland 2014-2020, Measure 2.3 (total project value: PLN 5,164,777.78, co-financing from European Funds: PLN 4,370,951.43).
Prezentacja: dr Laura Bandura-Morgan (Narodowe Centrum Nauki)
Krajowe Warsztaty Otwartego Dostępu OpenAIRE 2020, Polska
Polityki otwartości w Polsce
Cześć 2: dane badawcze
25 listopada 2020, online
OpenAIRE National Workshop in Poland (2020), organized as part of the OpenAIRE Advance project, was be devoted to the implementation of open access policies in Polish scientific institutions.
http://pon.edu.pl/politykiotwartosci/
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.Sérgio Sacani
The return of a sample of near-surface atmosphere from Mars would facilitate answers to several first-order science questions surrounding the formation and evolution of the planet. One of the important aspects of terrestrial planet formation in general is the role that primary atmospheres played in influencing the chemistry and structure of the planets and their antecedents. Studies of the martian atmosphere can be used to investigate the role of a primary atmosphere in its history. Atmosphere samples would also inform our understanding of the near-surface chemistry of the planet, and ultimately the prospects for life. High-precision isotopic analyses of constituent gases are needed to address these questions, requiring that the analyses are made on returned samples rather than in situ.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
Incentives, Integration, and Mediation: Sustainable Practices for Population Repositories, Iryna Kuchma, COAR
1. 1
Incentives, Integration, and
Mediation: Sustainable Practices
for Population Repositories
Iryna Kuchma
March 11, 2014
Opening Science to Meet Future Challenges
Warsaw
2. 2
Research is becoming increasingly global,
collaborative, networked, distributed OpenDOAR has ov
2500 repositories
listed
3. Our vision
3
…will enhance the provision, visibility and use of
research outputs
A global knowledge infrastructure, built upon a
network of open access digital repositories
4. Standards, policies,
infrastructure, strategy,
interoperability, support,
awareness, integration…
Inspired by Tim Berners
Lee
COAR aims to facilitate the
vision by bringing together
research repositories as part
of a global infrastructure;
to link across continents and
around the world, enabling
new forms of research
and supporting new models
of scholarly communication.
New modes of research and scholarly
communication
Research libraries
have a central role
to play.
5. • COAR e.V., a registered not-for-profit association of repository initiatives
according to German law, Office seat: Göttingen, DE, Host: Göttingen State
and University Library
• Founded in Ghent, Belgium, October 21, 2009 (28 members), evolved out
of the European DRIVER Project (EC, FP7)
• One Annual Meeting of all members with General Assembly
Members & Partners (January 2014): more than 100 member institutions
(out of over 30 countries in Asia, Europe, Northern and Latin-America); 6
partner organizations
• Elected Executive Board:
• Chairperson: Norbert Lossau, Göttingen State and University
Library, DE
• Vice Chairperson: Carmen-Gloria Labbé, Cooperación
Latinoamericana de Redes Avanzadas (CLARA), Uruguay
• Treasurer: Márta Virágos, University and National Library of
Debrecen, Hungary
Factsheet
6. 6
Members and partners
• Single Repository/University/Library organisations
– i.e. University of Toronto Libraries, Canada
• Federation (national, regional)
– i.e. Digital Repository Federation (DRF), Japan
• Research organisations (“Repository Provider”)
– i.e. Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library, China
• Governmental organisations, funders
– i.e. Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología, Spain
• Technology/Infrastructure Development
– Uniwersytet Warszawski, Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical
and Computational Modelling, Poland
• Service Provider
– i.e. OCLC (Online Computer Library Center), U.S.
7. COAR principles
• Global: COAR focuses on the needs and issue of interest of
repositories across the world
• Sensitive to local differences: COAR is cognizant of the tremendous
diversity globally, and aware that needs will differ depending on the
distinct regional environment.
• Strategic: Bringing together policy makers and regional networks to
work for a future vision of repositories
• Grass roots: COAR's success depends on active engagement of its
membership. Activities are initiated and driven by members, with
support of the overall organisation. This approach allows COAR to
address multiple objectives in parallel and to run at low cost
(compared to other infrastructures organisations).
• Synergistic: in order to achieve a common vision, repositories around
the globe must adopt common approaches to policies, metadata
schemas, vocabularies, etc.
7
8. Activities
Working Group 1: Repository Content
•Promote emerging and best practices in content recruitment
•Identify and support the development of overlay and value-added services
•Publication: “Incentives, Integration, and Mediation: Sustainable Practices for
Populating Repositories” (Disponible en espanol)
Related Task Forces and Interest Groups
Open Access Agreements and Licenses Task Force – Monitoring, evaluating
and promoting the implementation of effective open access agreements and
licenses
•New Report: “Open Access Clauses in Publishers’ Licenses – Current State
and Lessons Learned”
Repository Impact and Visibility Interest Group - Explore and document existing
approaches for maximizing repository visibility and develop new strategies that
can be adopted around the globe
8
9. Activities
Working Group 2: Repository Interoperability
•Define and promote interoperability, standards and infrastructure
policies
•Interoperability Roadmap: identify emerging issues and trends for
repository interoperability and determine priorities for focusing future
interoperability efforts.
Related Task Forces and Interest Groups
Interest Group “Usage Data and beyond” - Collecting experiences from
several projects in order to standardise the transfer protocol and data
format
Interest Group “Controlled Vocabulary for Repository Assets” (info:eu-
repo) - Establishing workflow for vocabulary maintenance & adopting
mainstream web practices for vocabulary encoding
9
10. Activities
Working Group 3: Repository and Repository Networks
Support and Training
•Facilitates a community of professionals through a global forum for
the exchange of information and experiences
•Collects and shares training materials developed elsewhere
•Produces training events: webinars, workshops, etc.
Related Task Forces and Interest Groups
•Joint Task Force on Librarians' Competencies in support of e-
Research and Scholarly Communication - outline the competencies
needed by librarians in this evolving environment (by ARL, CARL,
COAR and LIBER).
10
11. 11
RDA Long Tail of Research Data Interest
Group
•Develop a set of good practices for managing research data
archived in the university context.
Other Activities
Repository Observatory
•To help open access repositories to anticipate and
respond the constant state of rapid evolution.
•Identify trends and future scenarios in the context of the
use of repositories in research and education
Aligning Repository Networks
•Host an international meeting to discuss the alignment of open
access repository networks across regions.
12.
13. This report describes a number of profiles of
sustainable practices for populating repositories
that fall into three broad categories:
●
Incentives: promoting the benefits of
repositories through advocacy and metrics,
as well as the adoption of
policies/mandates that require deposit
●
Integration: amalgamating repository services
with other institutional services like research
information systems and research
biographies
●
Mediation: implementing tools, workflows, and
agreements that ease and simplify the
deposit process
14. Eight profiles of sustainable practices for populating
repositories:
1. Advocacy
2. Institutional Mandates
3. Metrics
4. Recruitment and Deposit Services
5. Research Biographies
6. Institutional Profiles
7. Publisher Agreements, and
8. Direct Deposit
15. “Both academics and administrative staff
need to know how they are going to
benefit from depositing in and working
with their institutional repository.”
(the UK Open Access Implementation
Group)
Advocacy
16. “Researchers must feel the repository is
their own.”
(Eloy Rodrigues, the University of Minho
in Portugal, a talk at the Couperin
Conference 2013)
Advocacy
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22. Advocacy
“The majority of institutions running a successful
repository have an open access ‘champion’ who has
played a major role in persuading staff to engage with
the repository… It is important for a senior member of
University management to take the lead in promoting
the repository and its benefits [not the library].
Champions within subject areas are also important, as
different areas of the institution will have different
concerns about open access.”
(The UK Open access Implementation Group)
25. @bernardrentier
- University that doesn't know what papers its
faculty publishes is like a factory that doesn't know
what it produces
- An empty repository is useless; a partly filled
repository is partly useless; there is a need for an
institutional open access policy
- Don't impose, just inform researchers that only
publications in the repository will be considered for
evaluation
- Mandate, keep authors at the core, communicate
permanently, be coherent, reduce constraints
- @ORBi_ULg – a personal workspace, provides
statistics and has a widget to generate publications
lists – content in personal/faculties webpages
27. At the University of Nebraska-Lincoln monthly
download statistics were crucial to convincing
faculty of the worth of the repository. “Faculty began
to compete with each other for most downloads.
Faculty sold the repository to each other. By
creating a “buzz” around the publishing work, the
coordinator was able to change the viewpoint from
why participate to how to participate."
Metrics
28. Professor Tom Cochrane, the deputy vice
chancellor of Technology, Information and Learning
Support at Queensland University of Technology in
Australia: OA content in the repository has offered
the university “much richer data for quality and
impact assessment".
Metrics
29.
30. Recruitment and Deposit Services
“Assisted deposit, either through departmental
administrative staff or librarians, accounted for
relatively high deposit rates for economics in the
Queensland and Melbourne IRs."
(A study by Xia et. al ., which looked at deposit rates at
seven institutions in Australia and the UK)
31. Recruitment and Deposit Services
Concordia University in Canada uses publisher’s alerts,
maintains a Refworks database of new faculty
publications, tags relevant citations, and uses this all
as the starting point for faculty outreach to populate
their repository.
32. The University of Kansas has expanded their one-
person repository operation into a cross-
departmental team staffed by librarians and
paraprofessionals with expertise in their tasks,
resulting in a substantial increase in the volume
of content deposited. They have developed a
workflow that “has been a great success,
allowing easy handoffs between several
individuals in two different departments and
expanding to provide greater efficiency as
processes develop. The system was designed
with tools to simplify operations, such as the
RefWorks interface, and the ability to add new
features as needed, such as the publisher data.”
The repository “is reportedly growing at a rate of
approximately 6000 items per year.”
33. Recruitment and Deposit Services
At Harvard University, for example, they employ several
students that perform most of the hands-on metadata
entry required for contributions into the repository, as
well as faculty outreach, education, and support.
Similarly, at the William & Mary Law School repository in
the US, students added almost 5,000 documents in
the first six months of the repository's existence.
34. Recruitment and Deposit Services
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
authors can delegate the upload of their research
outputs into the repository by using an online form.
Or, once authors’ full texts have been deposited into
the CRIS (Current Research Information System),
they will migrate the content into the repository. Using
this method, they have reported that they are
averaging around 2,000 items upload into the
repository per month.
35. Recruitment and Deposit Services
Rights checking services can also be automated. The
College of Wooster in the US, for example, has
developed a script that automates permissions
lookup in the SHERPA/RoMEO database.
The script has been made freely available for others to
use adapt in their own repository environment, and
has been integrated into repository operations
elsewhere.
37. Research Information Systems
At St. Andrews in the UK, they integrated their CRIS
system, “PURE”, with their institutional repository in
2010. “PURE has the ability to describe all aspects of
our research activity, expose data in flexible ways
and provide a workflow to pass full text research
outputs to our repository.”
This integration has resulted in significant increase in
the volume of content in the repository. They report,
“Between June and December 2010 our total content
grew by 52%.”
38.
39. Publisher Agreements
The Alliance for German Science
Organizations, which undertakes licensing
negotiations on behalf of a number of German
research centres and funding agencies, has
negotiated the right to deposit published articles into
repositories, within the context of their content
licenses.
40. Publisher Agreements
The BIBSAM Consortium in Sweden and the
FinELib Consortium in Finland have also
included archiving rights for authors within some their
licenses.
As well, the World Bank has been negotiating
separate agreements with publishers, which allow
publisher-wide deposit of articles into the repository.
42. References
Sustainable Practices for Populating Repositories Report:
https://www.coar-repositories.org/activities/repository-content/sustainable-practices-for-populating-repositories-report/
UK Open Access Implementation Group: http://open-access.org.uk/information-and-guidance/advocacy/
Rodrigues, Eloy. “OA policy at Minho: incentive and mandate,” January 25, 2013, Couperin Open Access Conference, Paris. http://couperin.sciencesconf.org/?lang=en
International Open Access Week: http://www.openaccessweek.org
Hita-Hita: Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan Ten Years On: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue71/tsuchide-et-al
EIFL 2012 annual report: removing barriers to knowledge sharing: www.eifl.net/system/files/201305/eifl_ar2012_oa.pdf
OA workshop for students and PhD candidates: http://www.eifl.net/events/oa-workshop-students-and-phd-candidates
Możesz to zrobić lepiej niż chomik! Studenci otwierają dostęp do nauki: http://uwolnijnauke.pl/dla-studentow/
ROARMAP: Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies: http://roarmap.eprints.org
ORBi: Open Repository and Bibliography: http://orbi.ulg.ac.be
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid: http://www.irgrid.ac.cn
Giesecke, J. (2011). Institutional Repositories: Keys to Success. Journal Of Library Administration, 51(5/6), 529-542. doi:10.1080/01930826.2011.589340
Berlin 10 Open Access Conference Recap by Abby Clobridge: http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Berlin--Open-Access-Conference-Recap-86197.asp
Altmetrics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altmetrics
Self-archiving to Institutional Repositories Is Improved by Assisted and Mandated Deposit; Disciplinary Culture is not a Factor by Gaby Haddow:
http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/1486
Madsen, DL, Oleen, JK. (2013). Staffing and Workflow of a Maturing Institutional Repository. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 1(3):eP1063.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1063
SHERPA/RoMEO API: http://pastebin.com/sXknBHDq
Narcis: http://www.narcis.nl
Increasing uptake at St Andrews – strategies for developing the research repository by Jackie Proven:
http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/10023/1824/1/ALISSarticleRepContent-submitted.pdf
DSpace CRIS Module; Contributed by Andrea Bollini (CINECA) and David T. Palmer (The University of Hong Kong): http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january13/01inbrief.html
Automated Article-Deposit, BioMed Central: http://www.biomedcentral.com/libraries/aad#
43. Why join COAR?
Pursue a common vision
COAR:
•Advocates at the international level to ensure that
repositories are a recognized part of the global
research infrastructure.
•Demonstrates to policy makers that institutions
are already working together to create this
infrastructure.
•Develops relationships with other stakeholder
organizations with common objectives.
43
44. Why join COAR?
Monitor trends and network with international
colleagues
COAR:
•Acts a forum for international cooperation and
knowledge exchange regarding repository
management and repository infrastructure
•Serves as your reference point for repository
standardization efforts
•Facilitates your participation in international
projects
44
45. Why join COAR?
Develop skills and knowledge
COAR
•Engages members in new developments and
trends in repository roles and developments.
•Helps to organize training programs for
repository managers
•Supports a community of practice of repository
managers, through workshops and other training
events
45
46. 46
If you share the vision of an open, global research
repository infrastructure, we would be delighted to
welcome you as a member of COAR!
Participants of the COAR Annual Meeting in
Istanbul, Turkey, 2013
47. How to join COAR?
An organization may become a member at
any time
• as a single institution (for only 500 EUR
per year)
• organizations with lots of members may
consider to establish a Group Consortium
– with discount on membership fee.
• as a Special Member (“fee waiver option”
for institutions from the least developed
countries)
…or become a Partner
47
48. Where can you get more information
about COAR?
• Visit the COAR Website:
www.coar-repositories.org
• Contact COAR Executive Director, Kathleen Shearer, for
more information:
kathleen.shearer@coar-repositories.org
• Contact the COAR office to register your interest in
becoming a member of COAR
office@coar-repositories.org
• Follow us on Twitter: #COAR_eV
• Find us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/COAReV